Sie sind auf Seite 1von 7

1/4/2019 Once hailed as unhackable, blockchains are now getting hacked - MIT Technology Review

We use cookies to offer you a better browsing experience, analyze site traffic, personalize content, and serve targeted
advertisements. Read about how we use cookies by clicking "Cookie Information." If you continue to use this site, you ❯ Cookie Information
consent to our use of cookies.
Never miss another blockchain story Sign up for free ×

MS. TECH

Connectivity

Once hailed as unhackable, blockchains are now getting hacked


More and more security holes are appearing in cryptocurrency and smart contract platforms, and some are fundamental to the way they were
built.

by Mike Orcutt February 19, 2019

     

arly last month, the security team at Coinbase noticed something


E
strange going on in Ethereum Classic, one of the cryptocurrencies
people can buy and sell using Coinbase’s popular exchange platform. Its
blockchain, the history of all its transactions, was under attack.

An attacker had somehow gained control of more than half of the network’s
computing power and was using it to rewrite the transaction history. That
made it possible to spend the same cryptocurrency more than once—known
as “double spends.” The attacker was spotted pulling this o to the tune of
$1.1 million. Coinbase claims that no currency was actually stolen from any
of its accounts. But a second popular exchange, Gate.io, has admitted it
wasn’t so lucky, losing around $200,000 to the attacker (who, strangely,
returned half of it days later).

Just a year ago, this nightmare scenario was mostly theoretical. But the so-
called 51% attack against Ethereum Classic was just the latest in a series of
recent attacks on blockchains that have heightened the stakes for the
https://www.technologyreview.com/s/612974/once-hailed-as-unhackable-blockchains-are-now-getting-hacked/ 1/7
1/4/2019 Once hailed as unhackable, blockchains are now getting hacked - MIT Technology Review
g
nascent industry.

Sign up for the Chain Letter


Blockchains, cryptocurrencies, and why they matter.

Your email Sign Up

Stay updated on MIT Technology Review initiatives and events? Yes No

In total, hackers have stolen nearly $2 billion worth of cryptocurrency since


the beginning of 2017, mostly from exchanges, and that’s just what has been
revealed publicly. These are not just opportunistic lone attackers, either.
Sophisticated cybercrime organizations are now doing it too: analytics firm
Chainalysis recently said that just two groups, both of which are apparently
still active, may have stolen a combined $1 billion from exchanges.

We shouldn’t be surprised. Blockchains are particularly attractive to thieves


because fraudulent transactions can’t be reversed as they often can be in the
traditional financial system. Besides that, we’ve long known that just as
blockchains have unique security features, they have unique vulnerabilities.
Marketing slogans and headlines that called the technology “unhackable”
were dead wrong.

That’s been understood, at least in theory, since Bitcoin emerged a decade


ago. But in the past year, amidst a Cambrian explosion of new
cryptocurrency projects, we’ve started to see what this means in practice—
and what these inherent weaknesses could mean for the future of
blockchains and digital assets.

How do you hack a blockchain?

Before we go any further, let’s get a few terms straight.

A blockchain is a cryptographic database maintained by a network of


computers, each of which stores a copy of the most up-to-date version. A
blockchain protocol is a set of rules that dictate how the computers in the
network, called nodes, should verify new transactions and add them to the
database. The protocol employs cryptography, game theory, and economics
to create incentives for the nodes to work toward securing the network
instead of attacking it for personal gain. If set up correctly, this system can
make it extremely di cult and expensive to add false transactions but
relatively easy to verify valid ones.

That’s what’s made the technology so appealing to many industries,


beginning with finance. Soon-to-launch services from big-name institutions
like Fidelity Investments and Intercontinental Exchange, the owner of the
New York Stock Exchange, will start to enmesh blockchains in the existing
financial system. Even central banks are now looking into using them for
new digital forms of national currency.

But the more complex a blockchain system is, the more ways there are to
make mistakes while setting it up. Earlier this month, the company in
charge of Zcash—a cryptocurrency that uses extremely complicated math to
let users transact in private—revealed that it had secretly fixed a “subtle
https://www.technologyreview.com/s/612974/once-hailed-as-unhackable-blockchains-are-now-getting-hacked/ 2/7
1/4/2019 Once hailed as unhackable, blockchains are now getting hacked - MIT Technology Review
cryptographic flaw” accidentally baked into the protocol. An attacker could

have exploited it to make unlimited counterfeit Zcash. Fortunately, no one


seems to have actually done that.

The protocol isn’t the only thing that has to be secure. To trade
cryptocurrency on your own, or run a node, you have to run a software
client, which can also contain vulnerabilities. In September, developers of
Bitcoin’s main client, called Bitcoin Core, had to scramble to fix a bug (also
in secret) that could have let attackers mint more bitcoins than the system is
supposed to allow.

Still, most of the recent headline-grabbing hacks weren’t attacks on the


blockchains themselves, but on exchanges, the websites where people can
buy, trade, and hold cryptocurrencies. And many of those heists could be
blamed on poor basic security practices. That changed in January with the
51% attack against Ethereum Classic.

The 51% rule

Susceptibility to 51% attacks is inherent to most cryptocurrencies. That’s


because most are based on blockchains that use proof of work as their
protocol for verifying transactions. In this process, also known as mining,
nodes spend vast amounts of computing power to prove themselves
trustworthy enough to add information about new transactions to the
database. A miner who somehow gains control of a majority of the network's
mining power can defraud other users by sending them payments and then
creating an alternative version of the blockchain in which the payments
never happened. This new version is called a fork. The attacker, who
controls most of the mining power, can make the fork the authoritative
version of the chain and proceed to spend the same cryptocurrency again.

For popular blockchains, attempting this sort of heist is likely to be


extremely expensive. According to the website Crypto51, renting enough
mining power to attack Bitcoin would currently cost more than $260,000
per hour. But it gets much cheaper quickly as you move down the list of the
more than 1,500 cryptocurrencies out there. Slumping coin prices make it
even less expensive, since they cause miners to turn o their machines,
leaving networks with less protection.

Toward the middle of 2018, attackers began springing 51% attacks on a


series of relatively small, lightly traded coins including Verge, Monacoin,
and Bitcoin Gold, stealing an estimated $20 million in total. In the fall,
hackers stole around $100,000 using a series of attacks on a currency called
Vertcoin. The hit against Ethereum Classic, which netted more than $1
million, was the first against a top-20 currency.

David Vorick, cofounder of the blockchain-based file storage platform Sia,


predicts that 51% attacks will continue to grow in frequency and severity,
and that exchanges will take the brunt of the damage caused by double-
spends. One thing driving this trend, he says, has been the rise of so-called
hashrate marketplaces, which attackers can use to rent computing power for
attacks. “Exchanges will ultimately need to be much more restrictive when
selecting which cryptocurrencies to support,” Vorick wrote after the
Ethereum Classic hack.

https://www.technologyreview.com/s/612974/once-hailed-as-unhackable-blockchains-are-now-getting-hacked/ 3/7
1/4/2019 Once hailed as unhackable, blockchains are now getting hacked - MIT Technology Review

A whole new can of worms bugs

Aside from 51% attacks, there is whole new level of blockchain security
weaknesses whose implications researchers are just beginning to explore:
smart-contract bugs. Coincidentally, Ethereum Classic—specifically, the
story behind its origin—is a good starting point for understanding them,
too.

A smart contract is a computer program that runs on a blockchain network.


It can be used to automate the movement of cryptocurrency according to
prescribed rules and conditions. This has many potential uses, such as
facilitating real legal contracts or complicated financial transactions.
Another use—the case of interest here—is to create a voting mechanism by
which all the investors in a venture capital fund can collectively decide how
to allocate the money.

Just such a fund, called the Decentralized Autonomous Organization


(DAO), was set up in 2016 using the blockchain system called Ethereum.
Shortly thereafter, an attacker stole more than $60 million worth
of cryptocurrency by exploiting an unforeseen flaw in a smart contract that
governed the DAO. In essence, the flaw allowed the hacker to keep
requesting money from accounts without the system registering that the
money had already been withdrawn.

As the hack illustrated, a bug in a live smart contract can create a unique
sort of emergency. In traditional software, a bug can be fixed with a patch. In
the blockchain world, it’s not so simple. Because transactions on a
blockchain cannot be undone, deploying a smart contract is a bit like
launching a rocket, says Petar Tsankov, a research scientist at ETH Zurich
and cofounder of a smart-contract security startup called ChainSecurity.
“The software cannot make a mistake.”

There are fixes, of a sort. Though they can’t be patched, some contracts can
be “upgraded” by deploying additional smart contracts to interact with
them. Developers can also build centralized kill switches into a network to
stop all activity once a hack is detected. But for users whose money has
already been stolen, it will be too late.

The only way to retrieve the money is, e ectively, to rewrite history—to go
back to the point on the blockchain before the attack happened, create a
fork to a new blockchain, and have everyone on the network agree to use
that one instead. That’s what Ethereum’s developers chose to do. Most, but
not all, of the community switched to the new chain, which we now know as
Ethereum. A smaller group of holdouts stuck with the original chain, which
became Ethereum Classic.

Last month, Tsankov’s team at ChainSecurity saved Ethereum from a


possible repeat of the DAO catastrophe. Just a day before a major planned
software upgrade, the company told Ethereum’s lead developers that it
would have the unintended consequence of leaving some contracts on the
blockchain newly vulnerable to the same kind of bug that led to the DAO
hack. The developers promptly postponed the upgrade and will give it
another go later this month.

Nevertheless, hundreds of valuable Ethereum smart contracts were already


vulnerable to this so-called reentrancy bug, according to Victor Fang,
https://www.technologyreview.com/s/612974/once-hailed-as-unhackable-blockchains-are-now-getting-hacked/ 4/7
1/4/2019 Once hailed as unhackable, blockchains are now getting hacked - MIT Technology Review
y g, g g,
cofounder and CEO of blockchain security firm AnChain.ai. Tens of
thousands of contracts may contain some other kind of vulnerability,
according to research conducted last year. And the very nature of public
blockchains means that if a smart-contract bug exists, hackers will find it,
since the source code is often visible on the blockchain. “This is very
di erent than traditional cybersecurity,” says Fang, who previously worked
for the cybersecurity firm FireEye.

Buggy contracts, especially those holding thousands or millions of dollars,


have attracted hackers just as advanced as the kind who attack banks or
governments. In August, AnChain identified five Ethereum addresses
behind an extremely sophisticated attack that exploited a contract flaw in a
popular gambling game to steal $4 million.

Can the hackers be defeated?

AnChain.ai is one of several recent startups created to address the


blockchain hacking threat. It uses artificial intelligence to monitor
transactions and detect suspicious activity, and it can scan smart-contract
code for known vulnerabilities.

Other companies, including Tsankov’s ChainSecurity, are developing


auditing services based on an established computer science technique called
formal verification. The goal is to prove mathematically that a contract’s
code will actually do what its creators intended. These auditing tools, which
have begun to emerge in the past year or so, have allowed smart-contract
creators to eliminate many of the bugs that had been “low-hanging fruit,”
says Tsankov. But the process can be expensive and time consuming.

It may also be possible to use additional smart contracts to set up


blockchain-based “bug bounties.” These would encourage people to report
flaws in return for a cryptocurrency reward, says Philip Daian, a researcher
at Cornell University’s Initiative for Cryptocurrencies and Contracts.

But making sure code is clean will only go so far. A blockchain, after all, is a
complex economic system that depends on the unpredictable behavior of
humans, and people will always be angling for new ways to game it. Daian
and his colleagues have shown how attackers have already figured out how
to profit by gaming popular Ethereum smart contracts, for instance.

In short, while blockchain technology has been long touted for its security,
under certain conditions it can be quite vulnerable. Sometimes shoddy
execution can be blamed, or unintentional software bugs. Other times it’s
more of a gray area—the complicated result of interactions between the
code, the economics of the blockchain, and human greed. That’s been known
in theory since the technology’s beginning. Now that so many blockchains
are out in the world, we are learning what it actually means—often the hard
way.

Keep up with the latest in blockchain at Business of


Blockchain 2019.

May 2, 2019
Cambridge, MA
Register now

https://www.technologyreview.com/s/612974/once-hailed-as-unhackable-blockchains-are-now-getting-hacked/ 5/7
1/4/2019 Once hailed as unhackable, blockchains are now getting hacked - MIT Technology Review

Related Video More videos

10 Breakthrough Technologies of 2019, curated by Bill Gates 17:18

Recommended for You

01 A new type of airplane wing that adapts midflight could change air travel

02 Hackers trick a Tesla into veering into the wrong lane


03 Burger King is going to start selling a meat-free “Impossible Whopper”
04 India says it has just shot down a satellite in space
05 Watching Boston Dynamics’ new robot stack boxes is weirdly mesmerizing

More from Connectivity


What it means to be constantly connected with each other and vast sources of information.

01 Why satellite mega-constellations are a threat to the future of space


A recent Indian anti-satellite test was hazardous, but plans for mass satellite launches by SpaceX and OneWeb could pose even greater risks in orbit.
by Mark Harris

https://www.technologyreview.com/s/612974/once-hailed-as-unhackable-blockchains-are-now-getting-hacked/ 6/7
1/4/2019 Once hailed as unhackable, blockchains are now getting hacked - MIT Technology Review

02 The space mission to buy us vital extra hours before a solar storm strikes
The sun’s violent activity can shut down the power grid and knock out satellites. ESA’s Lagrange mission will be our early warning system.
by Erin Winick

03 Europe’s copyright dispute shows just how hard it is to fix the internet’s problems
The EU has just passed the Copyright Directive: now small sites and tech giants alike will have to deal with the fallout and recriminations.
by James Ball

More from Connectivity

Want more award-winning journalism? Subscribe to Print + All Access Digital.

Print + All Access Digital $79.95/year*


The best of MIT Technology Review in print and online, plus unlimited access to our online archive, an ad-free web experience, discounts to
MIT Technology Review events, and The Download delivered to your email in-box each weekday.

Subscribe
Business Lab ×
See
Ourdetails+
new podcast helping business leaders make sense of new
technologies coming out of the lab and into the marketplace 

Listen now
*Prices are for U.S. residents only
See international prices

https://www.technologyreview.com/s/612974/once-hailed-as-unhackable-blockchains-are-now-getting-hacked/ 7/7

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen