Sie sind auf Seite 1von 7

Indo-European languages

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Jump to navigationJump to search
This article is about the family of languages found in much of Europe and Asia. For other uses,
see Indo-European.

Indo-European

Geographic Originally parts of Asia and large parts

distribution of Europe, now worldwide

c. 3.2 billion native speakers

Linguistic One of the world's primary language families

classification

Early form Proto-Indo-European

Proto-language Proto-Indo-European

 Albanian
Subdivisions
 Anatolian †

 Armenian

 Balto-Slavic (Baltic and Slavic)

 Celtic

 Germanic
 Hellenic (including Greek)

 Indo-Iranian (Indo-Aryan, Iranian, andNuristani)

 Italic (including Romance)

 Tocharian †

 Daco-Thracian †

 Illyrian †

ISO 639-2 / 5 ine

Glottolog indo1319[1]
Present-day native distribution of Indo-European languages, within

their homeland of Eurasia:

Albanian

Armenian

Balto-Slavic (Baltic)

Balto-Slavic (Slavic)

Celtic

Germanic

Hellenic (Greek)

Indo-Iranian (Indo-Aryan, Iranian, and Nuristani)

Italic (Romance)

Non-Indo-European languages

Dotted/striped areas indicate where multilingualism is common

Notes  Italicized branches mean only one extant

language of the branch remains

 † indicates this branch of the language family

is extinct

Part of a series on

Indo-European topics
Languages[show]

Philology[show]

Origins[show]

Archaeology[show]

Peoples and societies[show]

Religion and mythology[show]

Indo-European studies[show]

 v
 t
 e

The Indo-European languages are a language family of several hundred related languages
and dialects.[2]
There are about 445 living Indo-European languages, according to the estimate by Ethnologue,
with over two thirds (313) of them belonging to the Indo-Iranian branch.[3] The Indo-European
languages with the greatest numbers of native speakers
are Spanish, English, Hindustani (Hindi-Urdu), Portuguese, Bengali, Punjabi, and Russian,
each with over 100 million speakers, with German, French, Marathi, Italian, and Persian also
having more than 50 million. Today, nearly 42% of the human population (3.2 billion) speaks
an Indo-European language as a first language, by far the highest of any language family.
The Indo-European family includes most of the modern languages of Europe; notable
exceptions include Hungarian, Turkish, Finnish, Estonian, Basque, Maltese, and Sami. The
Indo-European family is also represented in Asia with the exception of Eastand Southeast
Asia. It was predominant in ancient Anatolia (present-day Turkey), the ancient Tarim
Basin (present-day Northwest China) and most of Central Asia until the
medieval Turkic and Mongol invasions. Outside Eurasia, Indo-European languages are
dominant in the Americas and much of Oceania and Africa, having reached there during
the Age of Discovery and later periods. Indo-European languages are also most commonly
present as minority languages or second languages in countries where other families are
dominant.
With written evidence appearing since the Bronze Age in the form of the Anatolian
languages and Mycenaean Greek, the Indo-European family is significant to the field
of historical linguistics as possessing the second-longest recorded history, after the Afroasiatic
family, although certain language isolates, such as Sumerian, Elamite, Hurrian, Hattian,
and Kassite are recorded earlier.
All Indo-European languages are descendants of a single prehistoric
language, reconstructed as Proto-Indo-European, spoken sometime in the Neolithic era.
Although no written records remain, aspects of the culture and religion of the Proto-Indo-
Europeans can also be reconstructed from the related cultures of ancient and modern Indo-
European speakers who continue to live in areas to where the Proto-Indo-
Europeans migrated from their original homeland.[4] Several disputed proposals link Indo-
European to other major language families. Although they are written in Semitic Old Assyrian,
the Hittite loanwords and names found in the Kültepe texts are the oldest record of any Indo-
European language.[5]
During the nineteenth century, the linguistic concept of Indo-European languages was
frequently used interchangeably with the racial concepts of Aryan and Japhetite.[6]

Contents

 1History of Indo-European linguistics


 2Classification
o 2.1Grouping
o 2.2Tree versus wave model
o 2.3Proposed subgroupings
o 2.4Satem and centum languages
o 2.5Suggested macrofamilies
 3Evolution
o 3.1Proto-Indo-European
o 3.2Diversification
o 3.3Important languages for reconstruction
o 3.4Sound changes
o 3.5Comparison of conjugations
 4Comparison of cognates
 5Present distribution
 6See also
 7Notes
 8References
o 8.1Citations
o 8.2Sources
 9Further reading
 10External links
o 10.1Databases
o 10.2Lexica

History of Indo-European linguistics[edit]


See also: Indo-European studies § History
In the 16th century, European visitors to the Indian subcontinent began to notice similarities
among Indo-Aryan, Iranian, and Europeanlanguages. In 1583, English Jesuit missionary
and Konkani scholar Thomas Stephens wrote a letter from Goa to his brother (not published
until the 20th century)[7] in which he noted similarities between Indian languages
and Greek and Latin.
Another account was made by Filippo Sassetti, a merchant born in Florence in 1540, who
travelled to the Indian subcontinent. Writing in 1585, he noted some word similarities between
Sanskrit and Italian (these
included devaḥ/dio "God", sarpaḥ/serpe "serpent", sapta/sette "seven", aṣṭa/otto "eight",
and nava/nove "nine").[7] However, neither Stephens' nor Sassetti's observations led to further
scholarly inquiry.[7]
In 1647, Dutch linguist and scholar Marcus Zuerius van Boxhorn noted the similarity among
certain Asian and European languages and theorized that they were derived from a primitive
common language which he called Scythian.[8] He included in his
hypothesis Dutch, Albanian, Greek, Latin, Persian, and German, later adding Slavic, Celtic,
and Baltic languages. However, Van Boxhorn's suggestions did not become widely known and
did not stimulate further research.

Franz Bopp, pioneer in the field of comparative linguistic studies.

Ottoman Turkish traveler Evliya Çelebi visited Vienna in 1665–1666 as part of a diplomatic
mission and noted a few similarities between words in German and in Persian. Gaston
Coeurdoux and others made observations of the same type. Coeurdoux made a thorough
comparison of Sanskrit, Latin and Greek conjugations in the late 1760s to suggest a
relationship among them. Meanwhile, Mikhail Lomonosov compared different language groups,
including Slavic, Baltic ("Kurlandic"), Iranian ("Medic"), Finnish, Chinese, "Hottentot"
(Khoekhoe), and others, noting that related languages (including Latin, Greek, German and
Russian) must have separated in antiquity from common ancestors.[9]
The hypothesis reappeared in 1786 when Sir William Jones first lectured on the striking
similarities among three of the oldest languages known in his time: Latin, Greek, and Sanskrit,
to which he tentatively added Gothic, Celtic, and Persian,[10] though his classification contained
some inaccuracies and omissions.[11] In one of the most famous quotations in linguistics, Jones
made the following prescient statement in a lecture to the Asiatic Society of Bengal in 1786,
conjecturing the existence of an earlier ancestor language, which he called "a common source"
but did not name:
The Sanscrit [sic] language, whatever be its antiquity, is of a wonderful structure; more perfect
than the Greek, more copious than the Latin, and more exquisitely refined than either, yet
bearing to both of them a stronger affinity, both in the roots of verbs and the forms of grammar,
than could possibly have been produced by accident; so strong indeed, that no philologer could
examine them all three, without believing them to have sprung from some common source,
which, perhaps, no longer exists.[note 1]
— Sir William Jones, Third Anniversary Discourse delivered 2 February 1786, ELIOHS[12]
Thomas Young first used the term Indo-European in 1813, deriving from the geographical
extremes of the language family: from Western Europe to North India.[13][14] A synonym is Indo-
Germanic (Idg. or IdG.), specifying the family's southeasternmost and northwesternmost
branches. This first appeared in French (indo-germanique) in 1810 in the work of Conrad
Malte-Brun; in most languages this term is now dated or less common than Indo-European,
although in German indogermanisch remains the standard scientific term. A number of other
synonymous terms have also been used.
Franz Bopp wrote in 1816 On the conjugational system of the Sanskrit language compared
with that of Greek, Latin, Persian and Germanic[15] and between 1833 and 1852 he
wrote Comparative Grammar. This marks the beginning of Indo-European studies as an
academic discipline. The classical phase of Indo-European comparative linguistics leads from
this work to August Schleicher's 1861 Compendium and up to Karl Brugmann's Grundriss,
published in the 1880s. Brugmann's neogrammarian reevaluation of the field and Ferdinand de
Saussure's development of the laryngeal theory may be considered the beginning of "modern"
Indo-European studies. The generation of Indo-Europeanists active in the last third of the 20th
century (such as Calvert Watkins, Jochem Schindler, and Helmut Rix) developed a better
understanding of morphology and of ablaut in the wake of Kuryłowicz's 1956 Apophony in
Indo-European, who in 1927 pointed out the existence of the Hittite consonant
ḫ.[16] Kuryłowicz's discovery supported Ferdinand de Saussure's 1879 proposal of the existence
of coefficients sonantiques, elements de Saussure reconstructed to account for vowel length
alternations in Indo-European languages. This led to the so-called laryngeal theory, a major
step forward in Indo-European linguistics and a confirmation of de Saussure's theory.[citation needed]

Classification[edit]
See also: Indo-European migrations and List of languages by first written accounts
The various subgroups of the Indo-European language family include ten major branches,
listed below in alphabetical order

 Albanian, attested from the 13th century AD;[17] Proto-Albanian has evolved from an
ancient Paleo-Balkan language, traditionally thought to be Illyrian,[18] however, the evidence
supporting this is still insufficient.[19]
 Anatolian, extinct by Late Antiquity, spoken in Asia Minor, attested in isolated terms
in Luwian/Hittite mentioned in Semitic Old Assyrian texts from the 20th and 19th centuries
BC, Hittite texts from about 1650 BC.[20][21]
 Armenian, attested from the early 5th century AD.
 Balto-Slavic, believed by most Indo-Europeanists[22] to form a phylogenetic unit, while a
minority ascribes similarities to prolonged language-contact.
o Slavic (from Proto-Slavic), attested from the 9th century AD (possibly earlier), earliest
texts in Old Church Slavonic. Slavic languages
include Bulgarian, Russian, Polish, Czech, Slovak, Montenegrin, Macedonian, Bosnian
, Croatian, Serbian, Slovenian, Ukrainian, Belarusian, and Rusyn.
o Baltic, attested from the 14th century AD; for languages first attested that recently,
they retain unusually many archaic features attributed to Proto-Indo-European (PIE).
Living examples are Lithuanian and Latvian.
 Celtic (from Proto-Celtic), attested since the 6th century BC; Lepontic inscriptions date as
early as the 6th century BC; Celtiberian from the 2nd century BC; Primitive Irish Ogham
inscriptions from the 4th or 5th century AD, earliest inscriptions in Old Welsh from the 7th
century AD. Modern Celtic languages include Welsh, Cornish, Breton, Scots Gaelic, Irish
Gaelic and Manx.
 Germanic (from Proto-Germanic), earliest attestations in runic inscriptions from around the
2nd century AD, earliest coherent texts in Gothic, 4th century AD. Old Englishmanuscript
tradition from about the 8th century AD.
Includes English, Frisian, German, Dutch, Danish, Swedish, Norwegian, Afrikaans, Yiddish
, Low German, Icelandic and Faroese.
 Hellenic and Greek (from Proto-Greek, see also History of Greek); fragmentary records
in Mycenaean Greek from between 1450 and 1350 BC have been found.[23] Homeric texts
date to the 8th century BC.
 Indo-Iranian, attested circa 1400 BC, descended from Proto-Indo-Iranian (dated to the late
3rd millennium BC).
o Indo-Aryan (including Dardic), attested from around 1400 BC in Hittite texts from Asia
Minor, showing traces of Indo-Aryan words.[24][25] Epigraphically from the 3rd century BC
in the form of Prakrit (Edicts of Ashoka). The Rigveda is assumed to preserve intact
records via oral tradition dating from about the mid-second millennium BC in the form
of Vedic Sanskrit. Includes a wide range of modern languages from Northern
India, Southern
Pakistan and Bangladesh including Hindustani, Bengali, Assamese, Punjabi, Kashmiri,
Gujarati, Marathi, Odia and Nepali as well as Sinhala of Sri Lanka.
o Iranian or Iranic, attested from roughly 1000 BC in the form of Avestan. Epigraphically
from 520 BC in the form of Old Persian (Behistun inscription).
Includes Persian, Ossetian and Kurdish
o Nuristani

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen