Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Ma’am:
We are proud and happy to inform you that the Piraka Elementary
School has completed the enhanced School Improvement Plan (e-SIP) for
School Years 2017-2019. We are endorsing this document for your perusal,
review and acceptance.
It is also our honor to inform you that this e-SIP is a collaboration of
the School Planning Team (SPT). Below are the members of the said team.
CASMIR O. CARIGA
School Head
Reviewed by: Recommending Approval:
SCHOOL’S SITUATION
On the other hand, the school is not worried of our school population
because most of the families are pro-life advocates. Presently, the school is a
mono grade, complete and non-central school from kindergarten to grade 6
with an enrolment of 712 pupils with 99% Muslims and 1% Christians, with
8 teachers.
The school has learners who are recipients of Conditional Cash Transfer
(CCT) or better known as 4Ps.
ELEMENTARY
School Report Card is a tool for informing our stakeholders about the
context, situation and performance of our school. Along these lines, Piraka
Elementary School Planning Team takes the course of defining its SRC with
the purpose of knowing the current situations in terms of all indicators
specified hereunder, and taking into accounts its comparative data for the
last three (3) years
1. Enrolment
600
500
400
200
312 328 339 318 347
309
100
0
2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016
Promotion Rate
100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
100.00%
80.00%
60.00%
40.00%
20.00%
0.00%
SY 2013-2014 SY 2014-2015 SY 2015-2016
66 22
600 67
112 24
500 111
109 110 35
400
0 34 33 38
SY2013-2014 SY2014-2015 SY2015-2016
Category 1
Data show that the NAT results for the last 3 consecutive school years have been
increasing. In the recent NAT, pupils performed well in MATHEMATICS, ENGLISH,
SCIENCE AND HEKASI. Intervention maybe needed to help the pupils in the area of
FILIPINO.
NAT Results
100.00%
90.00%
80.00% 86%
83.32%
70.00%
71.09%
60.00%
50.00%
40.00%
30.00%
20.00%
10.00%
0.00%
2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015
NAT Results
85.76
82.75
75.77
The data show a fluctuating results of NAT 3 for 3 consecutive years. This
means we need to sustain some of the best practices and improve those
competencies with very low performance.
200
177
156 159
200
0 0 0 0
150 0 0 0 0 Obese
Over weight
100 Normal
0 0 0 0
50 0 0 0 0 Wasted
Severey Wasted
0
GOVERNANCE
SBM-LEVEL Qualitative
Interpretation:
II Maturing
An average of 40 pupils per teacher but grade two and grade five classes exceeded the
1:40
ideal teacher-pupil ratio with 1:48 and 1:56 respectively.
80
75 75.20
70 68.32
65
63.00
60
55
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
The data show a fluctuating results of NAT 3 for 3 consecutive years. This
means we need to sustain some of the best practices and improve those
competencies with very low performance.
200
177
156 159
200
0 0 0 0
150 0 0 0 0 Obese
Over weight
100 Normal
0 0 0 0
50 0 0 0 0 Wasted
Severey Wasted
0
GOVERNANCE
SBM-LEVEL Qualitative
Interpretation:
II Maturing
An average of 40 pupils per teacher but grade two and grade five classes exceeded the
1:40
ideal teacher-pupil ratio with 1:48 and 1:56 respectively.
1: 42
We have six (6) makeshift classroom.
1: 89
Many classrooms have no functional comfort rooms.
1:1
The seats are enough for school enrollment.
5
1
0 1 2
0 0 0
0 1
0 1 1 1
5,000
132,000
240,255
70,000
94%
92%
90%
88%
86%
84%
82%
Extra- curricular Co-curricular Meetings Assemblies
STAKEHOLDERS NUMBER OF
CONTRIBUTION IN VOLUNTEER'S
PESO ( SY 2016) HOURS
600
Stakeholders Contribution in Peso ( SY 2016) Number of Volunteer's Hours
400
10,000
Stakeholders support the school in every single activity, a manifestation that the community
and the school have a good relationship.
After a series and thorough brainstorming and analysis of the School Planning
Team members, we have come-up with a school planning worksheet derived from
the results generated from the prioritized school improvement areas of concern.
The plan is devised according to the three key outcomes that we need to address
in order to recognize these pressing prioritizations as stated in our vision. These
three concerns are ACCESS, QUALITY, and GOVERNANCE.
The plan discloses the various programs, projects, and activities of the school to
be implemented to finally reach each general objective according to the three
outcomes towards the realization of our desired vision of improving every act
driven to address priority improvement areas (PIA).
Problem Statement: Enrolment over the past 3 school years has increase in
number representation, around 10 to 15 pupils fails to
re-enroll every beginning of classes.
Objective: To increase enrollment rate from 2% to 5% additional
learners.
Root Causes: Child labor/Household chores
Problem Statement: Periodical Tests MPS has decreased over the past three
years
Objective: To increase Periodical Tests and NAT MPS from 86% to
at least 90% gradually
Root Causes: Poor study habits
Problem Statement: School has been in level 2 for three (3) years now. By the
end of CY 2018, the school shall improve to level 3
Objective: To improve/increase school’s SBM level from level from
level 2 to level 3 with proper date management.
Root Cause: Lack of data management mechanisms
PROJECT WORK PLAN AND BUDGET MATRIX
Problem Statement: Most students and parents neglect the importance of risk
and disaster awareness and proper management
system
Objective: To provide effective and efficient mechanism system of
SDRR from 20% to 75%
Root Cause: Poor effective and efficient disaster and risk
management system
Note: All shaded tables with corresponding amount are not counted into the sum of AIP Total Amount. This TOTAL
AMOUNT is a SUM for the school MOOE. Expenditures herein are according to the qualified expenses of MOOE under
DO. No. 12,s. 2014. If found irrelevant, the amount is flexible to be used in school repair and maintenance.
CASMIR O. CARIGA
School Head
Approved:
1. Data Gathering
2. Data Validation
CASMIR O. CARIGA
School Head
RATNA S. DUMAGAY
School M & E Coordinator
The School Head is the process owner of the M & E system. As process
owner the school head must ensure the integrity and efficiency of the
system. This means, providing accurate, timely and relevant information
to school stakeholders. The School Head will also be the major beneficiary
of the lessons and insights generated by the M & E system.
FUNCTIONS:
Manages the QAAS in the school
Ensures implementation of SBM practice
Makes decisions pertinent to improving quality outcomes in the school
RESPONSIBILITIES
Orients school stakeholders on how to operationalize the QAA
and M & E system
Designates the members of the School QMT
Designs monitoring and feedback system (e.g. flow of reports and
feedback, reporting schedules, monitoring and feedback forms);
Convenes School QMT regularly to discuss M & E concerns
together with implementation team
Communicates the learners progress to intended stakeholders
Submits quarterly accomplishment report to SDS and school
stakeholders
Interacts with SDS and school internal and external stakeholders
3. SPT REPRESENTATIVE
FUNCTION
Monitors the implementation of SIP
RESPONSIBILITY
Updates M & E plan during SIP revisit