Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Team Members:
● Prasad Verekar - 2016120062
● Dhanashree Vinherkar - 2017220078
● Sahil Vora - 2016120063
● Hemant Bhusare - 2016220064
● Akashkumar Gupta - 2014120018
● Abhijit Iyer - 2015120012
● Vinit Koli - 2015120021
● Akshay Marale - 2016320078
Contents
● Legacy of Tata Motors
● Overview of Tata Nano
● Ratan Tata Vision, Mission
● Sirgur Plant controversy
● Where did they fail?
● Solutions used: Was it successful or failure
● What could have been done
● Conclusion
Legacy of ● Tata motors LTD, was formerly known as TELCO, is a
Protests
● Local farmers opposed the project.
● The unwilling farmers were given political
support by West Bengal's opposition leader
Mamata Banerjee,she started a “Save Farmland”
movement to oppose this project.
● Banerjee's ,"Save Farmland" movement was
supported by environmental activists like Medha
Patkar, Anuradha Talwar and Arundhati Roy.
EFFECTS OF
CONTROVERSY ● Tata Motors pulls out on 3rd Oct,2008 after a
brief meeting with the CM of W.B.
● Damages to public property and increase in
unemployment.
● Six states including Gujarat made offers as soon
as this news was spread.
● Gujarat won the bid,it had offered three strategic
locations of which one in Sanand was finalized
and construction of plant began on Nov,2008.
● The Plant was Built in a record time of 14 months.
Why Tata
Nano fail?
● Cheap price
● Looks of the car
● Negative publicity of a car
● Increasing competition of the second hand market
● Designing gone wrong
● Expectations vs reality
Solutions ●
●
Tata GenX Nano(2015-2018)
Redesign interior and exterior of car
used ●
●
Compressed-air engine
Electric vehicle
● Tata nano CNG emax(Bi-fuel)
● Tata super nano
● Crash safety
Value Proposition Method
What
could
Performance Value Relationship Value
have been
done
● The car was not able to cater the needs of the people, due
which its demand started reducing in the market, this led to
closing the production of the Nano car in year 2018.
Thank You