Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Hal 22-34
ANALYZING CLAUSE BY
HALLIDAY’S TRANSITIVITY SYSTEM
ABSTRACT
22
Muhammad Rayhan Bustam Analyzing Clause By Halliday’s Transitivity System
I. BACKGROUND
According to Halliday (1985a), there are three major functions of
language, namely: the ideational, the textual, and the interpersonal.
The ideational function is the use of language to express content and
to communicate information. Where content is the focus, the
emphasis will be on transferring information clearly and effectively so
that it can be comprehended quickly and easily. The ideational
function involves two main systems, namely: transitivity and
ergativity.
The other two functions of language are the textual and the
interpersonal. The textual function is the use of language to signify
discourse. Here, language becomes text, is related to itself and to its
contexts of use, including the preceding and following text, and the
context of situation. The textual can be classified into two structures,
namely: thematic structure (theme and rheme) and Information
structure (NEW and GIVEN). The interpersonal function is the use of
language to establish and maintain social relations. This function
involves modalities so that it is related to modus system. The system
is signified by two main elements, namely: mood and residue. In this
paper, however the writer will analyze about the transitivity, so only
about the transitivity that can be explained more detail.
Traditionally, transitivity is normally understood as the
grammatical feature, which indicates if a verb takes a direct object;
and we know some of the terms below:
a. If the verb takes a direct object, then it is described as transitive,
and
b. It is called intransitive if it does not;
c. An extension of this concept is the ditransitive verb, which takes
both a direct and an indirect object.
Halliday, however, found the new concept of transitivity. The
new concept represents a further development of the old concept. In
Halliday's conception in his Introduction to Functional Grammar,
whether a verb takes or does not take a direct object is not a prime
consideration. There are three components of what Halliday calls a
“transitivity process”, namely:
a. The process itself,
b. Participants in the process; and
23
Jurnal Ilmu Sastra Vol. 6 No.1, Mei 2011. Hal 22-34
From the quotations above, we can conclude that a clause has a close
relation to the ideational (both of the function and the meaning), so
that absolutely a clause also can be related to the transitivity. The
relation in here is we can analyze a clause by the transitivity system
or what Halliday calls as analyzing the meaning of clause as
representation.
25
Jurnal Ilmu Sastra Vol. 6 No.1, Mei 2011. Hal 22-34
I believe you
Senser Process: cognition Phenomenon
the performance is
Mr Nathan is the President
(1) intensive great
the President is Mr Nathan
26
Muhammad Rayhan Bustam Analyzing Clause By Halliday’s Transitivity System
the lecture is on a
today is the eighteenth;
(2) circumstantial Wednesday
the eighteenth is today
Further examples of the relational process modes and their types are
given in tables below:
D. Behavioral processes
27
Jurnal Ilmu Sastra Vol. 6 No.1, Mei 2011. Hal 22-34
E. Verbal processes
F. Existential processes
These processes represent that something exists or happens.
These clauses typically have the verb be, or some other verb
28
Muhammad Rayhan Bustam Analyzing Clause By Halliday’s Transitivity System
29
Jurnal Ilmu Sastra Vol. 6 No.1, Mei 2011. Hal 22-34
H. Circumstantial elements
To know more clearly about the elements, let’s see the table
of examples below:
III. DISCUSSION
From the quotation, it is clearly said that the only one unit of
analysis in the transitivity system is clause. The transitivity system is
also can help the users of language to express their experience, or
what Bloor and Bloor call as represent their perceptions of reality.
Furthermore, the writer will explain some excellences of
analyzing clause by the transitivity system. For the first excellence, let
us see some quotations below:
31
Jurnal Ilmu Sastra Vol. 6 No.1, Mei 2011. Hal 22-34
a) Material process
“Tom and Jim went up the hill to fetch a pail of water”
Tom went up the hill to fetch a pail of water
and Jim
Actor Process: circumstance Process: Goal
material material
b) Mental process and Verbal process
“Jim said he reckoned I would believe him next time”
Jim said he reckoned
Sayer Process: verbal Senser Process: cognition
The examples above show that we can know the process exactly
through the transitivity system. As the explanation before, we know
that the transitivity system divides processes into six, namely:
material, mental, relational, verbal, existential, and behavioral.
The last excellence is by transitivity system we can also analyze
reference case. As we know that reference is a part of grammatical
cohesion. Let us see a quotation below:
32
Muhammad Rayhan Bustam Analyzing Clause By Halliday’s Transitivity System
(1976) tells that the case can be solved by the transitivity system, just
like the analysis below:
From the analysis, we can see that the case can be solved; and after
the case is analyzed by transitivity we exactly know who refers to
whom. We, however have to more be careful of this case, because a
reference case is a semantic relation case. Thus, we also need to
analyze the meaning first.
From the discussion above, we can see some evidences that
the transitivity system is a way to analyze clause effectively.
IV. CONCLUSION
From all the parts above the writer can take some conclusions that :
1. The transitivity system can analyze clause effectively. The
transitivity also helps us recognize and encode our experiences of
the world.
2. The transitivity system specifies the different types of process
that are recognized in the language, and the structures by which
they are expressed. In transitivity system, there are six processes,
namely: material, mental, relational, verbal, existential, and
behavioral.
3. The transitivity system also can solve the case of personal
reference in contexts of potential ambiguity.
33
Jurnal Ilmu Sastra Vol. 6 No.1, Mei 2011. Hal 22-34
V. REFERENCES
34