Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
In economics, x-efficiency is the effectiveness with which a given set of inputs are used to produce
outputs. If a firm is producing the maximum output it can, given the resources it employs, such as
men and machinery, and the best technology available, it is said to be technical-efficient. x-
inefficiency occurs when technical-efficiency is not achieved.
This theory, originally developed for another purpose, has recently been applied to analyse the
role of the entrepreneur. Basically, X-efficiency is the degree of inefficiency in the use of resources
within the firm: it measures the extent to which the firm fails to realize its productive potential.
According to Leibenstein, When an input is not used effectively the difference between the actual
output and the maximum output attributable to that input is a measure of the degree of X-efficiency.
Leibenstein identifies two main roles for the entrepreneur: (i) a gap filler and (ii) an input completer.
These functions arise from the basic assumptions of X-efficiency theory. Thus it is clear that “if not
all factors of production are marketed or if there are imperfections in markets, the entrepreneur
has to fill the gaps in the market. To put the enterprise in motion, the entrepreneur should fill
enough of gaps.” The second role is input completion, which involves making available inputs that
improve the efficiency of existing production methods or facilitate the introduction of new ones.
The role of the entrepreneur is to improve the flow of information in the market.
The theory concludes that an entrepreneur has to act as gap filler and an input completer if there
are imperfections in markets. For using there unusual skills, he gets profits as well as a variety of
non-peculiar advantages. According to him there are two types of entrepreneurship.
Routine entrepreneurship – deals with normal business functions like co-ordinating the business
activities.
(ii) Innovative entrepreneurship – wherein an entrepreneur is innovative in his approach. It includes
the activities necessary to create an enterprise where not all the markets are well established or
clearly defined.
2) Innovation Theory by Schumpeter
The innovative theory is one of the most famous theories of entrepreneurship used all around the
world. The theory was advanced by one famous scholar, Schumpeter, in 1991. Schumpeter
analyzed the theory proposed by Marshall, and he concluded that the theory was wrong.
Schumpeter believes that creativity or innovation is the key factor in any entrepreneur’s field of
specialization. He argued that knowledge can only go a long way in helping an entrepreneur to
become successful.
However, Schumpeter viewed innovation along with knowledge as the main catalysts of successful
entrepreneurship. He believed that creativity was necessary if an entrepreneur was to accumulate
a lot of profits in a heavily competitive market.
Many business people support this theory, and hence its popularity over other theories of
entrepreneurship.
A dynamic theory of entrepreneurship was first advocated by Schumpeter (1949) who considered
entrepreneurship as the catalyst that disrupts the stationary circular flow of the economy and
thereby initiates and sustains the process of development. Embarking upon ‘new combinations’ of
the factors of production – which he succinctly terms, innovation – the entrepreneur activates the
economy to a new level of development.
The introduction of a new product with which consumers are not yet familiar or introduction of av
new quality of an existing product,
The introduction of new method of production that is not yet tested by experience in the branch ofv
manufacture concerned, which need by no means be founded upon a discovery scientifically new
and can also exist in a new way of handling a commodity commercially,
The opening of new market that is a market on to which the particular branch of manufacturer of
thev country in question has not previously entered, whether or not this market has existed before,
Conquest of a new source of supply of raw material and
The carrying out of the new organization of any industry.
Schumpeter is the first major theorist to put the human agent at the center of the process of
economic development. He is very explicit about the economic function of the entrepreneur. The
entrepreneur is the prime mover in economic development; his function, to innovate or carry out
new combinations. Schumpeter makes a distinction between an innovator and an inventor. An
inventor discovers new methods and new materials. On the contrary, an innovator is one who
utilizes or applies inventions and discoveries in order to make new combinations. An inventor is
concerned with his technical work of invention whereas an entrepreneur converts the technical
work into economic performance. An innovator is more than an inventor because he does not only
originate as the inventor does but goes much farther in exploiting the invention commercially.
According to David McClelland, regardless of culture or gender, people are driven by three
motives:
Achievement,
Affiliation
Power
Need for Achievement
A drive to excel, advance and grow. The need for achievement is characterized by the wish to take
responsibility for finding solutions to problems, master complex tasks, set goals, get feedback on
level of success.
McClelland found that certain societies tended to produce a large percentage of people with high
achievement. He pointed out that individuals, indeed whole societies that possess N-ach will have
higher levels of economic well-being than those that do not. McClelland’s work indicated that there
are five major components to the N-ach trait: (a) responsibility for problem solving, (b) setting goals,
(c) reaching goals through one’s own effort, (d) the need for and use of feedback, and (e) a
preference for moderate levels of risk-taking. The individual with high levels of need achievement
is a potential entrepreneur. The specific characteristics of a high achiever (entrepreneur) can be
summarized as follows:
(i) They set moderate realistic and attainable goals for them.
(iii) They prefer situations wherein they can take personal responsibility for solving problems.
(iv) They need concrete feedback on how well they are doing.
(v) Their need for achievement exist not merely for the sake of economic rewards or social
recognition rather personal accomplishment is intrinsically more satisfying to them.
According to McClelland, motivation, abilities and congenial environment, all combine to promote
entrepreneurship. Since entrepreneurial motivation and abilities are long run sociological issues;
he opined it is better to make political, Social and economic environments congenial for the growth
of entrepreneurship in underdeveloped and developing countries.
i. Risk creates Profit: According to the risk-bearing theory, the entrepreneur earns profits because
he undertakes risks.
ii. More Risk More Gain: The degree of risk varies in different industries. Entrepreneurs undertake
different degrees of risk according to their ability ad inclination. The risk theory proposes that the
more risky the nature of business, the greater must be the profit earned by it.
iii. Profit as Reward and Cost: Profit is the reward of entrepreneur for assuming risks. Hence, it is
also treated as a part of the normal cost of production.
iv. Entrepreneur’s Income is Uncertain: He identifies uncertainty with a situation where the
probabilities of alternative outcomes cannot be determined either by a priori reasoning or by
statistical inference. A priori reasoning is simply irrelevant to economic situation involving a unique
event. This theory summarizes that profit is the reward of an entrepreneur effort which arises for
bearing non insurable risks and uncertainties and the amount of profit earned depends upon the
degree of uncertainty bearing. Knight argues that business enterprises the level of uncertainty can
be reduced through ‘consolidation’. Consolidation is to uncertainty is what insurance is to risk; it is
a method of reducing total uncertainty by pooling individual instance. The elasticity of the supply
of self-confidence is the single most important determinant of the level of profit and the number of
entrepreneurs.
5) Hagen’s Theory of Entrepreneurship
One important theory of entrepreneurial behaviour has been propounded by Hagen, which is
referred to as the withdrawal of status respect. Hagen has attributed the withdrawal of status
respect of a group to genesis of entrepreneurship. Hagen considers the withdrawal of status, of
respect, as the trigger mechanism for changes in personality formation. Status withdrawal occurs
when members of some social group perceive that their purposes and values in life are not
respected by the groups in the society they respect, and whose esteem they value. Hagen
postulates four types of events, which can produce status withdrawal:
Displacement of a traditional elite group from its previous status by another traditional supply
physical force.
Denigration of valued symbols through some change in the attitude of the superior group.
Inconsistency of status symbols with a changing’ distribution of economic power.
Non-acceptance of expected status on migration to a new society.
Hagen further postulates that withdrawal of status respect would give to four possible reactions
and create four different personality types:
(a)Retreatist: Entrepreneur who continues to work in society but remains indifferent to his work or
status.
(b)Ritualist: One who works as per the norms in the society hut with no hope of improvement in
the working conditions or his status.
(c)Reformist: One who is a rebellion and tries to bring in new ways of working and new society.
(d)Innovator: An entrepreneur who is creative and try to achieve his goals set by himself.
According to Hagen, the creativity of a disadvantaged minority group is the main source of
entrepreneurship. He developed this thesis from the case of the samurai community of Japan.
Traditionally, this community had enjoyed a high status of which it was deprived later. To regain
this lost prestige, it became more active and vigorous and gave rise to many entrepreneurs.
McClelland supported this thesis by admitting that a suppressed community had more creativity.
He said that Jains could be successful entrepreneurs because of their consciousness of their
majority and superiority complexes. McClelland had modified Hagen’s thesis slightly in order to
explain such cases. He stated that the subordination of minority group could arouse achievement
motivation in its members but its extent depended upon the initial level of motivation and the means
available to the group to active its achievement motivations.
Theory of High Achievement/Theory of Achievement Motivation
•According to McClelland, a person has three types of needs at any given time,
which are:
Women Entrepreneurship
Agarbatti making
Papad making
Embroidery
Handicrafts
Catering services
Running restaurant, snack bars etc.
Small retail shops
Beauty parlors
Pickle manufacturing etc.
Women entrepreneurs can be broadly categorized into five
categories:-
♦ Affluent entrepreneurs – These are daughters and wives of wealthy
businessmen. These women have the financial aid and the necessary
resources to start a new enterprise and take business risks.
♦ Pull factors – These are educated women living in urban areas with or
without work experience who take the risk of a new enterprise with the
help of financial institutions and commercial banks. These women take
up a new business as a challenge in order to be financially independent.
Mobility problems
Family responsibilities and lack of support from family members.
Exploitation by middle man
Women have to be dependent on men for doing work which requires
muscular strength.
Women are perceived to be weak in the Indian society; hence men are
preferred over women to face troubles and hardships related to an
enterprise.