AI AND MACHINE LEARNING

Bene ts of AI and machine learning for

automation safety systems
Arti cial intelligence (AI) and machine learning can use the information from
robots and machines to help improve safety standards by learning what was
done in the past and applying it to future situations.
BY CHRIS VAVRA APRIL 10, 2019

Courtesy: Chris Vavra

The thought of using arti cial intelligence (AI) and machine learning for safety seems like an
oxymoron. Presenter Tina Hull, product engineer for Omron Automation, joked, “I’m an expert in
safety, and no one I know thinks I’m sane for using AI for safety applications,” at the start of her
presentation, “The Use of Machine Learning in Automation Safety Systems,” at Automate 2019
on April 9 at McCormick Place in Chicago. (Automate is organized by the Association for
Advancing Automation, A3.)

Using AI for safety is no more absurd, perhaps, than people landing on the moon, which Hull
used as a parallel to start the presentation. What might have seemed fanciful prior to space
exploration wasn’t to people like Robert Goddard. The same was true of John McCartney, the
father of AI. In 1956, he wanted to teach machines how to think. And this was back in the days
when computers or their precursors were gigantic machines that took up an entire room to
perform very primitive tasks.

Fast-forward to 2019, and we aren’t quite there yet, but it’s getting closer. Hull said, “We have a
lot of information. And with that info, there is so much we need to. When it comes to AI, we
need to organize data for safety applications to determine good and bad. Using this information
helps us better understand our systems.”
 Tina Hull, product engineer for Omron Automation, at her presentation, “The Use of Machine
Learning in Automation Safety Systems,” at Automate 2019 on April 9 at McCormick Place in
Chicago. Courtesy: Chris Vavra, CFE Media

And with machine learning, engineers have a little bit of an advantage because collaborative
robots have become common on the manufacturing oor. There is a lot of safety and
precaution built in through different standards and learning from experience.

“Everything applied today in safety is based on things we’ve learned from the past,” Hull said.
“We have to understand based on the machines we’ve learned from and apply that.”

Teaching robots how to learn

Hull used an analogy involving learning how to sail and knowing what kind of boat she and her
husband wanted to learn on. After a lot of reading and YouTube videos she came to a surprising
conclusion based on her initial learning experiences.

“What we’re learning is we know nothing, but we’re making connections,” she said. “We’re using
bits and pieces from past experiences and applying them to new experiences. We learn what
works, what doesn’t, and use them to make future decisions.”
h
The same, Hull said, is true for a robot. Robots are designed to work for the 95th percentile so
they can function properly with a person regardless of height. The robot is a taught what it’s like
to work with a person and vice versa. Humans have the advantage of adapting whereas the
robot, in its initial stages, is fairly dumb by comparison because it doesn’t have that human
element.

The technology used to send a man to the moon in the 1960’s would now t on our mobile
device, said Tina Hull of Omron. Courtesy: Chris Vavra, CFE Media

“We want to get to the point where the robot can adapt to the person it’s working with,” Hull
said.

Hull cited a few more analogies or potential capabilities through machine learning. Can the
robot learn to respond to someone whether they’re right- or left-handed? Are ergonomics, which
are all the rage from a safety standpoint, really needed if the robot is taught the basics about
the person they’re working with?

What about emotions? By de nition, robots have no emotion, but they might be able to adjust
their programming through technology such as facial recognition. Facial recognition is already
used to turn on computers and unlock smartphones. Hull took the idea a step farther and
suggested a day where the robot can sense if a human is having a bad day through facial
recognition and adapt its programming accordingly. Emotional sense? Robots have no emotion.
But facial recognition in robots is not far off.

Processing information to predict, prevent incidents

Hull said there is so much information out there, and it’s impossible for workers, especially
younger ones, to learn and retain it all. However, companies can close that gap by teaching the
machines and computer systems how to read and synthesize all that information for us.

An AI, through machine learning, also can interpret data and tell the worker what is needed to
build a safety system.

“Machine learning gives you the risk reduction tools,” Hull said. “It’ll give you short- and long-
term data of how things change.”

It also can predict when something is about to break or is in danger of breaking. Like a car’s
brakes, Hull said mechanical parts in a robot tend to wear down. A robot’s stop time, she said, is
slower as the robot gets older. Safety standards exist to give workers an idea of when
something might break, but there’s still risk involved.

What if, Hull asked, if an AI could predict when something happened by learning how a system
operates and prevent it from happening. “The technology is available to make these
calculations and help troubleshoot if there’s a problem,” she said.

Machine learning and AI in a new world

Manufacturing has changed from a static enterprise to a mobile one for many companies. A
robot used to be designed to perform the same task for 20 years. Now, Hull said, “We’re gonna
be lucky if robots do the same thing for two years. Consumer changes are changing product
demand, and it’s become more customized, and they have to adapt to those changes.”

Robots with abilities to adapt and learn from experiences, once the stuff of science ction, are
getting a lot closer to science fact. With the rest of the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) and
Big Data, every last bit of information is going to be scraped and analyzed. It won’t be long, Hull
said, before the machines start thinking with us because they’re already pretty close to doing it.

Chris Vavra, production editor, Control Engineering, CFE Media, cvavra@cfemedia.com.

For more from Hull, see articles highlighted and also see related content from Automate below.

Want this article on your website? Click here to sign up for a free account in ContentStream®
and make that happen.

Related Articles
 Simplify industrial networks and machine safety
Safety automation isn’t automatic
Improving industrial robot accuracy and precision

Chris Vavra
Author Bio: Production Editor, Control Engineering, CFE Media

+ VIEW COMMENTS
TRENDING TOPICS
Electrical

Energy Management

IIoT, Industrie 4.0

Maintenance

Mechanical

Plant Automation

Safety

Workforce Development
CONTACT
 CONTACT

CONTRIBUTE

TERMS OF USE

PRIVACY POLICY

3010 Highland Parkway Suite 325

Downers Grove, IL 60515
(630) 571-4070
Copyright 2019