Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
1
Updated July 2018.
-1-
Property Rights)
Yao v. People, G.R. No. 168306, June 19, 2007
2. Scope of protection
Const. (1987), art. III, sec. 3(1);
Katz v. U.S., supra
People v. Valdez, supra
Saluday, supra
-2-
Florida v. Jardines, No. 11–564. Argued October 31,
2012—Decided March 26, 2013T
C. Types
1. With A Search Warrant
a. Generally
Rule 126, sec. 1;
People v. Aruta, 288 SCRA 626 (1998)T
Manalili v. CA, 280 SCRA 400 (1997)
-3-
Abuan v. People, G.R. No. 168773. October 27, 2006T
PICOP v. Asuncion, 307 SCRA 253 (1999)
Rule on Cybercrime Warrants (A.M. No.17-11-03-SC)
-4-
Esquillo vs. People, G.R. No. 182010, August 25, 2010
Roan vs. Gonzales, supra
PICOP v. Asuncion, supra
People v. C.A., supra
f. Validity of warrant
People v. Estrada, supra
People v. CA, supra
-5-
Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752 (1969)T
Nolasco v. Paño, 147 SCRA 509 (1987);T
Cf. Nolasco v. Paño, 139 SCRA 152 (1985);
See Dissenting opinions of J. Teehankee, J. Abad Santos
& J. Cuevas
Posadas v. CA, 188 SCRA 288 (1990)
People vs. Cuizon, 265 SCRA 325
Malacat v. CA, 283 SCRA 159 (1997)**T
Maryland v. King, No. 12–207. Argued February 26,
2013—Decided June 3, 2013 T
Cellphones:
Riley v. California, June 25, 2014 T
b. Consented search
People v. Malasigui, 63 Phil. 221 (1936);
Alvarez v. CFI, 64 Phil. 48 (1937);
Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218 (1973)
People vs. Cuizon, 265 SCRA 325
-6-
People v. Comprado, G.R. No. 213225, [April 4, 2018]T
People v. Binad Chua, supra
Malacat v. CA, supra
Esquillo v. People, 629 SCRA 370 (2010)T
Note - J. Bersamin dissenting
People v. Cogaed, G.R. No. 200334. July 30, 2014
Manalili, (?)
Airport. Customs and Port searches:
People v. Canton, G.R. No. 148825, Dec. 27, 2002, supra
Dela Cruz v. People, G.R. No. 209387, [January 11, 2016]T
Roadblocks & Checkpoints:
City of Indianapolis v. Edmond, 531 U.S. 32 (2000)
Delaware v. Prouse, 440 U.S. 648 (1979);
Michigan Dept. of State Police v. Sitz, 496 U.S. 444
Alabama v. White, 496 U.S. 325
People v. Comprado, G.R. No. 213225, [April 4, 2018] supra
People v. Manago, G.R. No. 212340, [August 17, 2016]T
Caballes v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 136292, January 15, 2002;
People v. Lacerna, 278 SCRA 561 (1997)
People v. Solayao, 262 SCRA 255 (1996)
People v. Malmstedt, 198 SCRA 401(1991)
People vs. Encinada, G.R. No. 116720. October 2, 1997
Checkpoints:
Veridiano v. People, G.R. No. 200370, [June 7, 2017]T
Valmonte v. De Villa, 178 SCRA 211 (1989);
Aniag vs. COMELEC, 237 SCRA 424 (1994);
People v. Vinecario, 420 SCRA 280 (2004)T
-7-
People v. Cubcubin, Jr.
“PlainView”:
Moving the object is a search and not inadvertence?
Arizona v. Hicks, 480 U.S. 321 (1987)T
People v. Musa, 217 SCRA 597 (1993);T
People v. Doria, 301 SCRA 668 (1999);
People v. Bolasa, 321 SCRA 459 (1999);
People v. Evaristo, 216 SCRA 431 (1992);
People v. Valdez, 341 SCRA 24 (2000)T
g. Extraordinary circumstances:
People v. De Gracia, 233 SCRA 716 (1994);
Bringham City v. Stuart, 126 S.Ct. 1943 (2006)
-8-
People vs. Huang Zhen Hua, 439 SCRA 350 (2004)
B. Post-service procedure
People v. Gesmundo, supra
1. Issuance of Receipt
Rule 126, sec. 11;
People v. Lacbanes, 270 SCRA 193 (1997);
2. Delivery of property and inventory; return and proceedings on the
return:
Rule 126, sec. 12;
People v. Gesmundo, supra
3. “Chain of Custody” Rule and Requisites in searches and seizures
under Republic Act (R.A.) No. 9165, or the Comprehensive
Dangerous Drugs Act of 2002 as amended by R.A. No. 10640:
-9-
Remedy against warrantless searches:
Search warrants maliciously obtained and abuse in the service of those legally obtained (Art.
129) & Searching domicile without witnesses (Art. 130)
Galvante v. Casimiro, G.R. No. 162808, April 22, 2008
Civil Damages:
Silahis International Hotel, Inc. V. Panlilio, G.R. No. 163087, 02-20-2006
-10-