Sie sind auf Seite 1von 12

Clean Techn Environ Policy

DOI 10.1007/s10098-015-0920-2

ORIGINAL PAPER

Social acceptance of solar energy in Malaysia: users’ perspective


K. H. Solangi • R. Saidur • M. R. Luhur •
M. M. Aman • A. Badarudin • S. N. Kazi •
T. N. W. Lwin • N. A. Rahim • M. R. Islam

Received: 3 July 2014 / Accepted: 9 February 2015


Ó Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Abstract The increase in energy demand has caused reported that some hindrances, such as expensive solar
considerable attention to be directed toward sustainable panels and lack of correct information about solar energy
energy resources. The importance of electricity generation utilization, make fuel-generated electricity a preferable
through solar energy has been intensively highlighted choice. Meanwhile, almost 80 % of the respondents be-
globally, but Malaysia has yet to exert efforts to develop lieve that government incentives could best enhance solar
this energy resource. This study explores the social ac- energy usage nationwide. To implement new solar energy
ceptance and level of human interest in solar energy. In policies successfully in Malaysia, the government should
addition, this work identifies the difficulties in the con- support the establishment of solar power plants, as well as
sumption of solar energy and the expectations for solar provide complete information and funding for independent
energy development in Malaysia. Survey results show that research. Furthermore, more than 70 % of respondents
80 % of the respondents are highly interested in solar en- perceive the government to be the main organization that
ergy. However, the majority of the respondents have should lead the development of this energy sector. There-
fore, this research provides some useful references for
policy makers to continue promoting the use of solar en-
Electronic supplementary material The online version of this ergy in Malaysia.
article (doi:10.1007/s10098-015-0920-2) contains supplementary
material, which is available to authorized users.
Keywords Solar energy  Sustainable energy 
K. H. Solangi (&)  R. Saidur  A. Badarudin  Generation  Electricity  Promotion  Policy
S. N. Kazi  M. R. Islam
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering,
University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Introduction
e-mail: solangi@quest.edu.pk

M. R. Luhur Balancing supply and demand relative to energy con-


Quaid e Awam University of Engineering Science and sumption has become a global issue. Energy is essential for
Technology, Nawabshah, Sindh, Pakistan
economic and social development, as well as for improving
M. M. Aman the quality of life of human beings. Concerns about the
Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, increase in oil prices and the depletion of fossil fuel re-
University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia sources have recently arisen. Consequently, renewable
energy (RE) sources have gained attention as alternatives
T. N. W. Lwin
Faculty of Economics and Administration, University of Malaya, to fossil fuels (Ashnani et al. 2014; Moosavian et al. 2013;
50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Yee et al. 2009). Most studies have emphasized the ap-
plication of two renewable resources, namely, solar energy
N. A. Rahim
and wind (Majeed et al. 2010). Among various sustainable
UM Power Energy Dedicated Advanced Centre (UMPEDAC),
Level 4, Wisma R&D, University of Malaya, sources used for solar energy technologies, photovoltaic
59990 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (PV) technology appears to be relatively attractive for

123
K. H. Solangi et al.

electricity generation for its characteristics of noiseless- Mekhilef et al. 2014). However, this study is considered
ness, non-carbon dioxide emission during operation, scale significant for the following reasons: First, this study
flexibility, and simple operation and maintenance (Dinçer briefly reviewed the published literature and government
2011). The International Energy Agency (IEA) estimates policy on the use of solar energy to boost its utilization in
that solar power could provide as much as 11 % of global Malaysia. Second, this work examines the public per-
electricity production in 2050 (Katinas et al. 2013; spectives on solar energy, including interest in this issue,
Moosavian et al. 2013). hindrances for potential buyers, and public opinions on
In 2011, the total PV installed capacity in the world how the government should enhance solar energy devel-
increased to 68 GW and exceeded 100 GW in 2012 (Zhi opment in Malaysia. Third, this research could help the
et al. 2014). Among the energy sources, solar energy is government, private organizations, policy makers, or future
being considered to satisfy energy demand in Malaysia and investors in the solar energy sector by presenting the per-
the whole world (Gomesh et al. 2013). Malaysia is one of ceptions of the general public when determining ways to
the developing countries with a GDP of $15,400 per capita, boost solar energy utilization in Malaysia.
and its purchasing power parity (PPP basis) based on
steady GDP growth rate was 4.6 in 2009 (IMF 2011;
Fokaides et al. 2014). Parallel to the growth rate, energy Review on solar energy situation in Malaysia
consumption has grown by approximately 5.6 % between
2000 and 2005 (Balo 2011). The energy consumption of Malaysia’s tropical climate, which has abundant sunshine
the industrial sector has grown at a rate of 4.3 %, and this averaging 1643 kWh/m2 in annual irradiance, favors solar
sector used 48 % of the total energy consumed in 2007 energy development. Tables 1 and 2 compare the monthly
(BoroumandJazi et al. 2012; Shafie et al. 2011). Solar en- mean G (global solar irradiation on horizontal surface with
ergy remains more than other RE sources mainly because atmosphere) G0 (extraterrestrial solar irradiation on
of its ‘‘plug and play’’ features, which differs from other horizontal surface without atmosphere), in MJ/m2/day, for
resources that require mechanical support, such as motors all regions (Kuala Terengganu, Bayan Lepas, KLIA, Sepang,
or generators (hydro, wind, and wave), or chemical support Muadzam Shah, Senai, Ipoh, Kuantan, Pulau Langkawi,
(bio fuels) that are mostly circumstance oriented (Shafie Subang) for the years 2007–2009. The monthly mean global
et al. 2011). In addition, solar energy has huge potential in solar irradiation between 2007 and 2009 clearly was the
Malaysia because of the strategic geographical location of highest for Kuala Terengganu. However, the Kota Bharu and
the country. Subang stations had higher readings in March. Table 1
The public acceptance of solar energy and the level of shows that the solar irradiation data, especially those of the
willingness to pay for green electricity among the respon- northern and north-eastern regions of the Peninsular
dents will be investigated to understand the preliminary Malaysia state of Terengganu, show high solar irradiations
acceptance level of a new RE technology in Malaysia. that are higher than those of other states. The regions are also
With considerations of the global critical energy situation near the beach. Hence, Terengganu has high development
and the future energy scenario in Malaysia, this study re- potential for solar energy applications (especially solar
views existing solar energy utilization systems in Malaysia power plants). Table 3 shows the monthly and yearly aver-
and investigates public perspectives on the understanding age sunshine duration at the given stations in Malaysia. The
and acceptance of solar energy among consumers. Survey datasets for this study were obtained from the archives of the
results showed that only 26 % respondents were familiar Malaysia Meteorological Department stations (University of
with and 42 % were somewhat familiar with RE, whereas Malaya KL, BOP Research Station, PPP Tun Razak, GRC
almost 30 % are ignorant of RE. Public awareness of RE Tanah Merah and Kuala Terengganu) in 2009. The highest
remains weak even among potential users of solar energy monthly average sunshine was at GRC Tanah Merah in May
furthermore, survey results cover solar energy importance, at 7.5 sunshine hours. The yearly average calculated to be the
awareness, and correct information regarding solar energy highest was also at GRC Tanah Merah at 5.93 sunshine
appliances used in Malaysia. The above coordination has hours. The maximum solar radiation was approximately
not been considered so the present work has attempted to 6.027 kWh/m2 per day in Sabah and 5.303 kWh/m2 per day
compile public awareness and policy making activities. In in Sarawak, which indicate that the potential for applying
sum, this study bridges the gap between policymakers, solar energy for electrification is extremely high (Borhana-
investors, and the public regarding the understanding of the zad et al. 2013). Approximately 10,000 household warm
solar energy market. water systems in Malaysia are running through by solar en-
The issues of solar energy enhancement and RE use in ergy (Kettha 2008). The climate is suitable for the use of
Malaysia have been comprehensively studied by many solar energy because the country enjoys several sunny days
scholars in the energy sector (Cucchiella et al. 2014; in the year (Azhari et al. 2008). Current solar energy

123
Social acceptance of solar energy in Malaysia

Table 1 Monthly mean global No. Month Bayan Lepas KLIA Sepang Muadzam Shah Senai Ipoh
solar radiation and
extraterrestrial solar radiation G G0 G G0 G G0 G G0 G G0
for meteorological stations in
MJ/m2/day 1 January 19.28 32.51 14.91 33.53 13.33 33.40 16.37 33.95 18.93 32.80
2 February 20.23 34.43 13.44 35.11 14.91 35.03 16.19 35.39 19.85 34.63
3 March 19.14 37.35 16.65 37.58 15.41 37.55 18.45 37.65 19.61 37.42
4 April 17.85 36.59 17.83 36.28 18.43 36.32 17.75 36.12 17.72 36.51
5 May 20.23 37.65 19.63 36.89 18.03 36.99 20.38 36.55 19.89 37.45
6 June 18.90 35.51 16.48 34.59 16.25 34.71 17.52 34.18 18.14 35.25
7 July 20.36 37.96 19.94 37.08 19.33 37.19 19.74 36.68 18.98 37.72
8 August 18.83 38.00 16.98 37.49 18.36 37.55 17.78 37.25 17.94 37.86
9 September 11.65 36.38 14.88 36.39 16.60 36.39 14.27 36.38 11.98 36.39
10 October 13.53 36.31 13.06 36.87 13.42 36.80 14.51 37.09 14.76 36.48
11 November 18.73 34.63 15.69 35.61 12.18 35.49 17.61 36.01 18.04 34.92
12 December 17.07 33.40 18.70 34.56 15.40 34.42 18.55 35.04 16.80 33.74

Table 2 Monthly mean global No. Month Kuantan Pulau Langkawi Subang Kota Bharu Kuala Terengganu
solar radiation (G) and
extraterrestrial solar radiation G G0 G G0 G G0 G G0 G G0
(Go) for meteorological stations
in MJ/m2/day 1 January 13.62 33.12 18.59 32.08 15.27 33.38 15.39 32.15 18.51 32.56
2 February 13.72 34.84 19.46 34.14 15.29 35.01 20.06 34.18 21.61 34.46
3 March 14.97 37.49 20.08 37.24 19.10 37.55 20.38 37.25 22.42 37.36
4 April 15.99 36.41 17.59 36.69 17.69 36.33 21.81 36.67 23.63 36.57
5 May 18.73 37.21 19.56 37.94 21.63 37.01 19.51 37.90 19.60 37.61
6 June 17.89 34.97 17.39 35.86 17.93 34.73 19.46 35.81 18.34 35.46
7 July 20.55 37.45 17.61 38.30 20.31 37.21 18.42 38.25 19.20 37.91
8 August 17.64 37.70 17.06 38.18 18.43 37.57 20.63 38.15 20.11 37.97
9 September 16.13 36.39 12.32 36.35 15.94 36.39 19.59 36.35 20.14 36.37
10 October 14.52 36.65 16.00 36.07 15.70 36.79 17.65 36.10 17.19 36.33
11 November 11.67 35.22 17.34 34.22 19.11 35.47 13.96 34.28 16.16 34.68
12 December 16.09 34.10 16.53 32.92 20.14 34.39 13.87 33.00 12.95 33.46

Table 3 Monthly and yearly average sunshine duration hours of stations for 2009
Stations Lat Long Ht above Yearly Monthly average sunshine duration hours
M.S.L (m) avg
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Universiti Malaya, KL 3°070 N 101°390 E 104.0 5.6 5.1 6.3 5.5 6.8 7.2 6.2 5.9 6.2 5.2 5.2 3.4 4.2
0
BOP Research Station 2°49 N 101°300 N - 4.3 2.9 4.4 4.6 6.2 6.3 4.9 4.6 5.2 3.0 4.6 2.9 3.0
PPP Tun Razak 03°500 N 102°340 E 76.3 5.9 5.6 7.1 5.8 6.7 6.8 7.0 5.5 6.5 5.4 6.4 3.6 4.5
GRC Tanah Merah 2°390 N 101°470 E 5.4 5.9 5.8 6.0 5.5 6.2 7.5 6.9 6.0 6.6 5.3 6.0 4.1 5.3
Kuala Terengganu 5°200 N 103°080 E 35.1 5.2 4.3 7.3 5.8 5.3 5.4 6.9 5.2 5.6 5.1 4.9 3.2 4.4

consumption in Malaysia reaches 1 MW and can potentially has come to understand that these oil resources may not
achieve 6500 MW (Ashnani et al. 2014). meet energy demands (Ashnani et al. 2014). With the
Malaysia needs more energy sources to meet the de- production level of 2005, the country can rely on its oil
mand for energy because of the growing economy. The reserve for only 15 years, whereas gas reserves are ex-
country owns the second largest oil reservoir in the Asia pected to be reliable for 29 years. Based on the 2013
Pacific region with total reserves of 5.6 billion barrels analyses of Asia-Pacific Energy Research Center, the de-
(Štreimikien_e and Baležentis 2014). However, Malaysia mand in the residential and commercial sectors will exhibit

123
K. H. Solangi et al.

the fastest growth from 2010 to 2035 at 1023 Mtoe or 64 % RE make solar thermal competitive already today even in
(Brau et al. 2013). Crude oil and natural gas are the major areas of low solar radiation (Katinas et al. 2013). Although
energy sources. Approximately 47 % of total energy sup- solar cooling is still in an early demonstration stage, in
ply came from crude oil in 2001. However, this supply countries with stable solar radiation and unstable, expen-
decreased substantially to 31 % of the total energy supply sive electricity, solar cooling may become a viable alter-
within 10 years (Gutiérrez-Arriaga et al. 2013). Natural gas native to electric chillers in the next 10 years.
gradually replaced crude oil as the leading energy source, Electricity demand in Malaysia is expected to reach
accounting for 45 % of the total energy supply in 2011 18,947 MW by 2020 and 23,092 MW in 2030, with the
compared with 40 % in 2001 (Lim and Lam 2014). The latter being a 35 % increase from 14,007 MW in 2008
energy supply of coal and coke increased from 6 to 19 % of (Shafie et al. 2011). The tenth Malaysia Plan sets the target
the total commercial energy supply over 10 years from of 985 MW by 2015 for grid-connected generation pro-
2001. This circumstance is akin to turning the clock back duced by RE sources (i.e., 5.5 % of total electricity gen-
because a large body of evidence has shown that coal eration in the country). This energy volume is supposed to
burning negatively affects the environment (Singh and be generated from biomass (330 MW), biogas (100 MW),
Parida 2013). mini-hydro (290 MW), solar PV (65 MW), and solid waste
Solar technology is a new technology and developing at (200 MW) sources. The Malaysian state adopted the feed-
a linear rate. Solar technology has been popularized since in-tariff (FiT) program in December 2011 for the power
the application of this alternative energy source on a pocket obtained from renewable sources. FiT is financed by way
calculator (Solangi et al. 2011). Solar panels are being used of a levy charged on electricity subscribers in the economy
along the north–south highways, telecommunication tow- (Ashnani et al. 2014). The state also founded a special
ers, and even for street lighting (Chua and Oh 2012). The agency called the Sustainable Energy Development
massive advertisement and popularity of solar technology Authority as a subsidiary of the Ministry of Energy, Green
have prompted the public to rely on solar technology Technology, and Water to handle the FiT fund, as well as
(Bamufleh et al. 2013). Solar energy is expected to become to foster and motivate developments in the field of RE. The
a crucial energy source that will sustainably meet national government expects that an operational capacity of 3 GQ
electricity demand (Rahman Mohamed and Lee 2006). may be obtained from new RE by 2020. Thus, one-third of
This case will be especially apparent in several remote the energy will be generated from solar PV. Moreover,
islands and hilly areas without grid connection access. biomass will constitute another one-third of the energy.
Thus, solar energy integration into the existing energy Malaysia’s current RE electricity capacity is 50 MW,
system in remote island communities and rural areas is of which is expected to reach approximately 2000 MW by
significant interest to researchers (Hossain et al. 2014). The 2020 (Muhammad-Sukki et al. 2011).
solar energy can be use at industry level for example; solar Malaysia’s Vision 2020 aims for a fully industrialized
thermal energy Hot water usage for bathing and washing, Malaysia by 2020. This objective highlights the energy
Pre-heated water up to 80° to Boilers, Pasteurization, usage of the country (Oh et al. 2010). Current plans for
condensation and cleaning in Milk Dairies, Drying and addressing environmental issues include preparing of a
tanning in leather process industries, Degreasing and national greenhouse gas (GHG) inventory (committed to
phosphating in metal finishing industry, Resin Emulsifica- Articles 4 and 12 of UNFCCC), signing of the Kyoto
tion in Polymer Industry, Drying in food, wood, livestock Protocol, and reviewing and assessing updates on vul-
and pharmaceutical industry, and Swimming pool water nerability the of animal habitats caused by climate change
heating etc. (Basri et al. 2015). In terms of the sectoral (which will gauge the adaptation needs and prepare the
breakdown, the food and tobacco sector has almost half of initial National Communication for the COP) (Saidur et al.
the potential, with the balance well spread among other 2011). Meanwhile, the energy sustainability issue has been
sectors. This is particularly important for developing and addressed through the implementation of a few measures
least developed countries, where the development and (Saidur et al. 2009). The eighth Malaysia Plan specified a
modernization of the food industry has a critical role to new five-fuel strategy, with RE being targeted as the fifth
play in terms of food security (Cucchiella et al. 2014). fuel with a 5 % (600 MW) contribution to the 2005 elec-
Solar thermal systems can help developing countries to tricity mix (Muhammad-Sukki et al. 2011). The nineth
stabilize food prices by reducing their connection to the Malaysia Plan (2006–2010) also targeted a 5 % contribu-
volatile prices of oil and other energy commodities tion (Islam et al. 2011). However, the announcement for
(UNIDO 2014). An analysis of several sources suggests the the five-fuel policy resulted in only 1 % RE contribution
current generation and investment costs for technologies after a decade (Oh et al. 2010). The Malaysian energy
need substantial cost reductions to become competitive. In policy encompasses only supply, usage, and environmental
some specific markets, taxes on fossil fuels or subsidies for objectives, with no particular solar energy policy being in

123
Social acceptance of solar energy in Malaysia

place (Mariyappan 2000b). Post-2020, solar energy is is 1.25–1.75 RM/kWh, with annual degression of 6 % and
predicted to surpass all other REs (Fig. 1) in Malaysia in a displaced cost of 0.35 RM/kWh. These values are shown
terms of cumulative installed capacity (Chen et al. 2007). in Table 4.
By 2050, solar PV alone is expected to contribute more To achieve these targets, the efforts of the FiT program
than a third of the annual total electricity generation. should consider entitling RE-source electricity at a fixed
As an initiative effort of the government, RE was an- premium price (1.25–1.75 RM/kWh with annual degres-
nounced as the fifth fuel in the energy supply mix (Rahim sion of 6 %) for a specific duration (Ahmed et al. 2013).
2011). In addition, RE has been targeted to be a significant This condition will provide a conducive and secure in-
contributor to the total electricity supply in the eighth vestment environment through financial loads and will
Malaysia Plan (Máša et al. 2013). RE has exemplified an promote the function of research and development (R&D)
energy policy with emphasis on intensifying energy effi- through research institutions and universities (Poh and
ciency to meet 5 % of the country’s energy mix in line with Kong 2002).
the sustainable development agenda, as discussed in the The government subsidizes approximately 60 % of
nineth Malaysian Plan (2006–2010) (Gude et al. 2012).The current generated electricity energy prices. Malaysia is not
Malaysian Building Integrated PV (BIPV) project intro- adequately efficient to enhance solar energy use. The major
duced the following three major incentives in 2010: obstacles identified are as follows: (1) high subsidies for
(i) SURIA 1000 and SURIA for developers; (ii) demon- fossil fuels in contrast to the low incentives for RE-based
stration, and (iii) showcase. Each of these incentives were projects (UNDP 2007); (2) high capital expenditure with
tied up with varying amounts of investment to incentivize long payback period and low tariff, causing financial in-
the installation of BIPV technology and to accelerate the stitutions and investors to shy away from RE projects (Ali
program (Muhammad-Sukki et al. 2012). As of May 2011, et al. 2008); and (3) long negotiations involved in RE
approximately 1652 kWp of solar PV capacity has been Power Purchase Agreement, which has stringent conditions
successfully installed and commissioned in four types of (Khor and Lalchand 2014). For example, no customer drive
buildings, namely, residential, commercial, industrial, and incentive is made available, unlike in the United States,
school (Gadenne et al. 2011). This five-year project has where net metering is allowed for citizens who install the
also managed to decrease the cost of PV significantly from device (Saidur et al. 2010). Subsidies by the government
MYR31410 per kWp in December 2005 to MYR19120 per are insufficient for PV manufacturing and the material cost
kWp in March 2010, a reduction of approximately 40 % of (Lau et al. 2009). For instance, 100 % subsidies in pro-
the cost (Mansor 2008). Further reduction to MYR15000 duction cost are provided by Canadian government,
per kWp is expected (Muhammad-Sukki et al. 2012). whereas a 50 % tax credit on material costs is provided for
The RE Policy and Action Plan was cited in the tenth main residences in France (Solangi et al. 2011).
Malaysia Plan (2011–2015) to achieve the RE target of
985 MW by 2015, as shown in Fig. 2. This target can be
achieved through the FiT program, which could contribute Methodology
5.5 % to Malaysia’s electricity generation mix (Chua et al.
2011). Counting from 2011, the FIT fixed rate for solar PV This study is designed as an exploratory investigation be-
cause limited knowledge is available regarding the social
acceptance of solar energy in Malaysia. Additional knowl-
edge regarding this issue may effectively boost solar energy
usage. This purpose of this study is three-fold. First, this
work explores public attitude toward the utilization of solar
energy. Second, this study investigates public responses
regarding the difficulties in consuming solar energy. Third,
this research analyzes public perspectives on enhancing
solar energy development in Malaysia. This study employs
both primary and secondary data in the investigation. By
implementing a survey method, the responses from the
ground were considered as the primary data. Information
was collected by distributing the survey questionnaires to
residents of Kuala Lumpur and in surrounding universities,
colleges, schools, offices, shopping malls, factories, and
commercial business. However, in this context it may kindly
Fig. 1 Cumulative installed capacity of RE (Chua and Oh 2012) be noted that about 37.5 % respondents were from rural

123
K. H. Solangi et al.

Fig. 2 Renewable energy


targets in the tenth Malaysia
Plan (Malaysia plan 2010)

Table 4 Proposed Malaysian FiT rates (starting from 2011) (Chua et al. 2011)
RE technologies/resources FiT duration Range of FiT rates Annual Displaced electricity
(years) (RM/kW h) min–maxa degression (%)a cost (RM/kWh)b

Biomass (palm oil, agro-based) 16 0.24–0.35 0.5 0.2214


Biogas (palm oil, agro-based, farming) 16 0.28–0.35 0.5 0.2214
Mini-hydro 21 0.23–0.24 0 0.2214
Solar PV 21 1.25–1.75 6 0.3504
Solid waste and sewage 21 0.30–0.46 1.8 0.2214
Wind 21 0.23–0.35 1.5 0.2214
Ocean, geothermal 21 0.28–0.46 1 0.2214
a
Subject to final confirmation upon RE law enactment
b
Subject to tariff increment

areas but working in Kuala Lumpur. The survey was con- Malaysia. The second requirement was that the participants
ducted between December 2011 and January 2012. Level of must be at least 18 years old. At the time of conducting the
understanding of solar energy was not considered in the survey some general questions were asked from the re-
distribution of questionnaires to the respondents. The lan- spondents such as: Interest in environmental issues, Infor-
guage used in the questionnaires was simple and under- mation about global warming, Familiar with RE
standable, with only a few technical terms because the technologies, which RE is best for Malaysia, Interest in
respondents might be from different backgrounds, with solar energy etc. Therefore, the respondents replied to the
varying levels of exposure to this field. However, respon- above questions with relevant information were only se-
dents with a basic understanding of RE were preferred. lected for the questionnaire survey. In terms of population
In the sample design of the survey, two criteria were design, the respondents from Kuala Lumpur are from all
considered for participation in the exercise. The first re- regions of the country and stayed in this city for various
quirement was that the respondents must be citizens of reasons, such as education, employment, or business. The

123
Social acceptance of solar energy in Malaysia

survey was conducted through convenience sampling of Table 5 Demographics of respondents (n = 400)
participants from Kuala Lumpur. The respondents were Characteristics of respondents Frequency Percentage
generally not a representative (sample) group for the whole
nation. In this research, some questions in the questionnaire Gender
were compared with relevant literature. Male 196 49.00
As our new contribution in our study purposely aims to Female 204 51.00
explore the perspectives and acceptance of the participants Education level
on solar energy without discriminating their religious and Finished high school or less 110 27.50
ethnic background, the survey scope was limited to ur- Finished diploma or college 160 40.00
banized participants living in Kuala Lumpur. Finished bachelor degree or graduated 130 32.50
Residential area
Urban 250 62.50
Results and discussions Rural 150 37.50
Occupation
The development of the energy sector by the government Shopkeeper 160 40.00
has been surveyed on the basis of this background. The Office staff 110 27.50
general characteristics of the respondents, public attitudes University students 75 18.75
toward the interest in solar energy utilization, public views Workers 55 13.75
on the difficulties in consuming solar energy, and public
expectation on enhancing solar energy utilization in
Malaysia are analyzed and discussed in this section. Table 6 Level of interest in solar energy
This survey was conducted between December 2011 and
January 2012 using the data collection method from the Level of public interest in solar energy Frequency Percentage
convenience sampling of people in Kuala Lumpur. A total Agree 318 79.50
of 600 questionnaires were distributed and 400 responses Disagree 23 5.80
were received. In this context, the respondents were se- No opinion 59 14.80
lected on the basis of their familiarity with the current Total 400 100.00
energy production, energy consumption, new financial
schemes, subsidy on fossil fuels, and new energy projects
introduced by the government in its tenth Malaysia plan. public interest in solar energy. The table reveals that almost
Regardless of ethnicity, income level, education level, 80 % of the respondents are overwhelmingly interested,
residential areas, and gender, the respondents of this survey whereas only less than 5.8 % are not interested. Therefore,
were at least 18 years old. Survey was conducted by per- a high potential for solar energy usage is observed, which
sonal interaction with the respondents and relevant con- reflects the sufficiently high level of public interest in solar
sistency maintained. The collected data were analyzed energy issues.
using SPSS 16. According to the Malaysian government energy policy,
approximately 60 % of the current energy price is subsi-
General characteristics of the respondents dized by the government. With this background, the survey
was developed to examine public interest in buying solar
The general characteristics of the respondents are as fol- panels and in using solar-generated electricity for their
lows: male respondents comprised 49 %, whereas 51 % homes. Two questions were asked on this issue. First is
were female. In terms of religion, 85 % of the respondents regarding the attitudes of the respondents toward the pos-
were Muslim, whereas the rest had other religions. In terms sibility of buying solar-generated electricity if it costs as
of age, 35 % were between 18 and 30, 55 % were aged much as fossil fuel-generated electricity. Second is re-
between 31 and 45, and the rest were between 45 and garding the possibility of buying solar panels if 50 % of the
55 years old. Table 5 shows the demographics of the total total cost is subsidized by the government.
respondents. Table 7 shows that almost 57 % of the respondents said
‘‘yes,’’ indicating their interest in buying solar-generated
Public attitudes toward their interest in utilization electricity if the cost is as much as the current price of
of solar energy fossil fuel-generated electricity. Nearly 30 % of the re-
spondents were unsure, whereas the rest said ‘‘no.’’ These
The conducted survey aimed to explore the public attitudes responses imply the high possibility that the public will
toward solar energy utilization. Table 6 shows the levels of purchase solar-generated electricity in Malaysia.

123
K. H. Solangi et al.

Table 7 Interest in buying solar panels and solar-generated elec- difficulties, which hinder potential consumers from using
tricity for the home (n = 400) solar energy. In addition, this work investigates the social
Level of public interest Yes No Unsure acceptance of solar energy in Malaysia. The survey re-
vealed several hindrances that have influenced consumer
Freq % Freq % Freq %
considerations in purchasing and installing a solar panel
Possibility of buying 229 57.25 53 13.25 118 29.50 system. Figure 3 shows that the initial cost is the major
solar panels if 50 % of obstacle faced by consumers who use solar energy appli-
the total cost is
subsidized by the
ances at home. Four options were given for that question to
government the respondents. This aspect is considered as the most
Possibility of using 328 82.00 13 3.25 59 14.75 important by 53 % of the respondents. Moreover, 50 % of
solar-generated the respondents claimed to lack correct information as a
electricity if the cost is basis to decide, choose, and install solar energy for the
as much as fossil fuel-
home. The respondents were unwilling to install solar en-
generated electricity
ergy technology until more information on solar energy
system/appliances is available. Such information includes
The result of the second question shows that (see how these appliances work, how the electricity bill is re-
Table 7) 57 % respondents are agreed to buy solar panels if duced, how low the cost is, and what the experiences of
government subsidizes 50 % of the total cost of panels. other users are. Furthermore, 43 % claim that obtaining the
82 % of the respondents are highly interested in using solar best possible price for solar energy is a major problem.
generated electricity if cost is as much as fossil fuel-gen- Other consumer barriers include the need for more infor-
erated electricity. Less than 15 % are unsure, whereas the mation, demand for additional or professional assistance,
rest are uninterested. Therefore, a high tendency to achieve lack of time, lack of knowledge and trust in the solar
the solar energy target of the government is observed if the system provider, concern over product performance, poor
expenses of the potential consumers or the general public brand image, and lack of information on environmental and
are subsidized to half of the total cost of solar panels. social performances of both product and manufacturer.
This result proves that Malaysia has a huge solar energy
Public responses on their difficulties in consuming solar market if the initial cost of installation is overcome, as well
energy as if the public receives correct information on the pur-
chase of solar energy appliances and on installation pro-
This study explores the difficulties faced by the general cess. Thus, accomplishing these suggestions will likely
public, as well as the underlying reasons for these help boost Malaysia’s solar energy usage to achieve the

Fig. 3 Public responses on 250


their difficulties in consuming
solar energy

200
Frequencies

150
Most Important

100 Important
Least important
No response
50

0
Inial cost Correct info Obtaining Good ROI Tech
best Obsolate
possible
price

123
Social acceptance of solar energy in Malaysia

Fig. 4 Public opinions on ways 350


to increase solar energy usage
300 Support Do not support

250

Frequencies
No opinion No response
200
150
100
50
0
Increases taxes Finding Increase solar Increase taxes Government Increase taxes
trustworthy panel on fuels incentives to on businesses
contractor Installation build solar that release
power plants GHG's into the
atmosphere

65 MW target for solar-generated energy by 2015, as de- This survey result implicitly indicates that the government
clared in the tenth Malaysia Plan. can boost solar energy usage through various subsidies and
increased taxes on existing businesses that use fossil en-
Public expectations on enhancing solar energy ergy. Furthermore, this result suggests that the government
development in Malaysia should increase the provision for making full information
available to the public, funding of research related to solar
Considering public opinion is important to meet the ob- energy, and initiation of increased solar energy usage and
jectives of the solar energy policies implemented by the installation.
government. This study intends to determine public ex- Finally, this study examines public views on the level of
pectations relative to the enhancement of solar energy organizational role in solar energy development to under-
usage in Malaysia by considering public opinions and stand comprehensively the public expectations on en-
public attitudes toward the implementation of new solar hancing solar energy development in Malaysia. Figure 6
energy policies. In addition, this study analyzes the views shows that 75 % of the respondents believe that govern-
of the public on the level of organizational role in solar mental organizations are the most important institutions in
energy development. promoting this issue, 74 % state that research institutions
Figure 4 shows public opinions on the ways to increase are almost equally important, and approximately 60 %
solar energy usage. The result shows that almost 80 % of the believe that the academia is the top priority. Interestingly,
respondents believe that government incentive to build solar more than 50 % of the respondents believe that commu-
power plants ‘‘is the best way to enhance solar energy usage nication or mass media crucially influences public aware-
nationwide’’. Moreover, 69 % of the respondents believe ness and enhances knowledge related to solar energy
that increasing taxes on enterprises that release GHGs into development. Almost half of the respondents agree that
the atmosphere is another good idea, whereas 62 % support commercialization serves an important function in devel-
the increase in solar panel installation to meet energy needs. oping solar energy in Malaysia.
These results imply that the majority of respondents perceive Therefore, the survey results clearly reveal the sugges-
that the government is the main body responsible for pro- tions on the best ways by which the government, solar
moting solar energy usage. Notably, almost 60 % of the re- energy policy makers, R&D centers, and communication
spondents believe that ‘‘increasing taxes’’ on solar-related and commercial sectors can boost the solar energy usage in
products is not a viable idea to help boost solar energy usage. the near future. Thus, the present exercise has added new
The result on public attitude toward the implementation information to the present knowledge level of the re-
of new solar energy policies is shown in Fig. 5. To enhance searchers and policy makers.
solar energy development in Malaysia, approximately
62 % of the respondents expect more solar power plants to
be installed nationwide, 55 % believe that the public Survey-based policies
should obtain full access to information, 51 % recommend
increased funding for independent research, and 48 % 1. Only a few open spaces (e.g., rooftops) have been used
claim the importance of increasing solar panel installation. for harnessing solar power (e.g., PV panel or solar

123
K. H. Solangi et al.

Fig. 5 Public attitude toward 300 Most important Important


the implementation of new solar
energy projects Unimportan No response
250

200

Frequencies
150

100

50

0
Support of solar Full information Funding of Increase installation
power plants independent research of solar panels

Fig. 6 Public views on the 350 Top Priority


level of organizational role in
solar energy development Some Priority
300
No Priority
250 No response
Frequencies

200

150

100

50

0
Governmental Academic Research Communicational Commercial
(Mass Media)

water heater) despite the abundant solar energy po- 3. Effective financial support is essential. Such support
tential of Peninsular Malaysia. The non-participation could include tax credits and better financing terms.
of individuals and institutions can be attributed to the Other governments provide such support through
lack of incentives. This obstacle is the most serious subsidy (investment subsidies, product subsidies, and
relative to the expansion of the Malaysian RE market. consumer subsidies) and pricing policies. Stimulation
In addition, this challenge is considered as a major of consumption encourages demand and expands the
hurdle for the government to overcome if public par- market. Pricing policy could include price setting.
ticipation is to be encouraged. When vendors meet set prices, approval time is reduce,
2. The government should consider overcoming con- which consequently speeds up contract signing and
sumer barriers. The respondents revealed that other project commencement. Prices can be reviewed as
consumer barriers include the need for more informa- solar energy technologies advance and as installed
tion; demand for additional/professional assistance; capacity increases. With 82 % of survey respondents
lack of time, knowledge, and trust in the provider; indicating a willingness to buy solar panels if the
concern over product performance; poor brand image; government subsidizes half the cost, subsidies have
and lack of information on the environmental and high potential for converting consumers into RE users.
social performances of both products and manufactur- A metering arrangement that credits owners of solar
ers. Awareness programs on the benefits of solar power systems fairly for the energy generated and
energy can be implemented through such media as supplied to the grid could also encourage the use of
magazines, television, and regional campaigns. solar electricity. FiT scheme has the potential to

123
Social acceptance of solar energy in Malaysia

increase solar PV penetration and the Green Tech- prime movers. Therefore, the Malaysian government
nology Financing Scheme is potentially a good source should take on a fundamental role in implementing
of funds for companies while for home owners, a soft solar energy policies.
loan facility with an interest rate of 5 % is a possible
source of funds for financing solar energy program. Acknowledgments The authors would like to acknowledge the
4. Development of an R&D infrastructure could be University of Malaya for funding the project. The research has been
emphasized and encouraged through partnerships be- carried out under the Project No. UM.K/636/1/HIR (MOHE)/ENG46
tween the government and private businesses. and UMRG Fund RP012D-13AET.

Conclusions
References
Balancing energy needs has become a crucial issue in the Ahmed T, Ahmad M, Lam H, Yusup S (2013) Hydrogen from
Malaysian energy sector. RE has been announced as the fifth renewable palm kernel shell via enhanced gasification with low
fuel in the energy supply mix. Therefore, finding possible carbon dioxide emission. Clean Technol Environ Policy
ways to boost solar energy utilization among the general 15(3):513–523. doi:10.1007/s10098-013-0606-6
Ali B, Sopian K, Chan HY, Mat S, Zaharim A (2008) Key success
public is important. This study examines the social acceptance factors in implementing renewable energy programme in
of solar energy in Malaysia. The country has a tropical climate Malaysia. WSEAS Trans Environ Dev 4(12):1141–1150
with abundant sunshine averaging 1643 kWh/m2 in annual Ashnani MHM, Johari A, Hashim H, Hasani E (2014) A source of
irradiance. These conditions favor solar energy development. renewable energy in Malaysia, why biodiesel? Renew Sustain
Energy Rev 35:244–257. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.04.001
This study highlights the social acceptance of solar energy by Azhari AW, Sopian K, Zaharim A, Ghoul M (2008) A new approach
exploring public interest in solar energy, public responses on for predicting solar radiation in tropical environment using
the difficulties in consuming solar energy, and public expec- satellite images-case study of Malaysia. Environ Dev 4:373–378
tations on enhancing solar energy usage in Malaysia. Balo F (2011) Energy and economic analyses of insulated exterior
walls for four different city in Turkey. Energy Educ Sci Technol
Several crucial findings and key conclusions are stated Part A 26(2):175–188
below: Bamufleh H, Ponce-Ortega J, El-Halwagi M (2013) Multi-objective
optimization of process cogeneration systems with economic,
1. The majority of the respondents are highly interested environmental, and social tradeoffs. Clean Technol Environ
in solar energy in Malaysia. Policy 15(1):185–197. doi:10.1007/s10098-012-0497-y
2. Approximately 60 % of the respondents are willing to Basri NA, Ramli AT, Aliyu AS (2015) Malaysia energy strategy
towards sustainability: a panoramic overview of the benefits and
choose solar energy if the cost related to solar energy
challenges. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 42:1094–1105. doi:10.
usage is only as much as the current price of fossil 1016/j.rser.2014.10.056
fuel-generated electricity. Borhanazad H, Mekhilef S, Saidur R, Boroumandjazi G (2013)
3. More than 80 % of the general public is willing to buy Potential application of renewable energy for rural electrification
in Malaysia. Renew Energy 59:210–219. doi:10.1016/j.renene.
solar panels if 50 % of the total cost is subsidized by
2013.03.039
the government. BoroumandJazi G, Saidur R, Rismanchi B, Mekhilef S (2012) A
4. Among the respondents who consume solar energy, the review on the relation between the energy and exergy efficiency
majority stated that the initial cost is the highest analysis and the technical characteristic of the renewable energy
systems. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16(5):3131–3135. doi:10.
hindrance. Some respondents stated that the lack of
1016/j.rser.2012.02.057
correct information hinder them from choosing solar Brau J-F, Morandin M, Berntsson T (2013) Hydrogen for oil refining
energy. via biomass indirect steam gasification: energy and environ-
5. The majority of the respondents believe that building mental targets. Clean Technol Environ Policy 15(3):501–512.
doi:10.1007/s10098-013-0591-9
solar power plants with substantial government capital
Chen S-T, Kuo H-I, Chen C-C (2007) The relationship between GDP
would be the best way to develop solar energy. These and electricity consumption in 10 Asian countries. Energy Policy
respondents also believe that obtaining full access to 35(4):2611–2621. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.10.001
information is important. Chua SC, Oh TH (2012) Solar energy outlook in Malaysia. Renew
Sustain Energy Rev 16(1):564–574. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2011.08.
6. The majority of respondents claim that governmental 022
organizations should take the lead in boosting solar Chua SC, Oh TH, Goh WW (2011) Feed-in tariff outlook in Malaysia.
energy usage. Other respondents have reported the Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15(1):705–712. doi:10.1016/j.rser.
importance of research and academic institutions, mass 2010.09.009
Cucchiella F, D’Adamo I, Gastaldi M (2014) Financial analysis for
media, and commercial organizations.
investment and policy decisions in the renewable energy sector.
7. Existing successful solar energy policies in developing Clean Technol Environ Policy 31:1–18. doi:10.1007/s10098-
and developed countries show that governments are the 014-0839-z

123
K. H. Solangi et al.

Dinçer F (2011) The analysis on photovoltaic electricity generation Mekhilef S, Saidur R, Said SM, Hong PH, Islam MR (2014) Techno-
status, potential and policies of the leading countries in solar economic evaluation of energy efficiency measures in high rise
energy. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15(1):713–720. doi:10.1016/ residential buildings in Malaysia. Clean Technol Environ Policy
j.rser.2010.09.026 16(1):23–35. doi:10.1007/s10098-013-0587-5
Fokaides Paris A, Miltiadous Irene-Chrysovalanto, Neophytou Mari- Moosavian SM, Rahim NA, Selvaraj J, Solangi KH (2013) Energy
na K-A, Spyridou Lia-Paschalia (2014) Promotion of wind policy to promote photovoltaic generation. Renew Sustain
energy in isolated energy systems: the case of the Orites wind Energy Rev 25:44–58. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.03.030
farm. Clean Technol Environ Policy 16(3):477–488 Muhammad-Sukki F, Ramirez-Iniguez R, Abu-Bakar SH, McMeekin SG,
Gadenne D, Sharma B, Kerr D, Smith T (2011) The influence of Stewart BG (2011) An evaluation of the installation of solar
consumers’ environmental beliefs and attitudes on energy saving photovoltaic in residential houses in Malaysia: past, present, and
behaviours. Energy Policy 39(12):7684–7694. doi:10.1016/j. future. Energy Policy 39(12):7975–7987. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.
enpol.2011.09.002 09.052
Gomesh N, Daut I, Irwanto M, Irwan YM, Fitra M (2013) Study on Muhammad-Sukki F, Munir AB, Ramirez-Iniguez R, Abu-Bakar SH,
Malaysian’s perspective towards renewable energy mainly on solar Mohd Yasin SH, McMeekin SG, Stewart BG (2012) Solar
energy. Energy Proced 36:303–312. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2013.07.035 photovoltaic in Malaysia: the way forward. Renew Sustain
Gude VG, Nirmalakhandan N, Deng S, Maganti A (2012) Low Energy Rev 16(7):5232–5244. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.05.002
temperature desalination using solar collectors augmented by Oh TH, Pang SY, Chua SC (2010) Energy policy and alternative
thermal energy storage. Appl Energy 91(1):466–474. doi:10. energy in Malaysia: issues and challenges for sustainable
1016/j.apenergy.2011.10.018 growth. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14(4):1241–1252. doi:10.
Gutiérrez-Arriaga C, Serna-González M, Ponce-Ortega J, El-Halwagi 1016/j.rser.2009.12.003
M (2013) Multi-objective optimization of steam power plants for Poh KM, Kong HW (2002) Renewable energy in Malaysia: a policy
sustainable generation of electricity. Clean Technol Environ analysis. Energy Sustain Dev 6(3):31–39
Policy 15(4):551–566. doi:10.1007/s10098-012-0556-4 Rahim NA, Saidur R, Solangi KH, Othman M, Amin N (2011) Survey
Hossain FM, Hasanuzzaman M, Rahim NA, Ping HW (2014) Impact of grid-connected photovoltaic inverters and related systems.
of renewable energy on rural electrification in Malaysia: a Clean Technol Environ Policy 12:1–13
review. Clean Technol Environ Policy 84:1–13. doi:10.1007/ Rahman Mohamed A, Lee KT (2006) Energy for sustainable develop-
s10098-014-0861-1 ment in Malaysia: energy policy and alternative energy. Energy
IMF (2011) International monetary fund: Malaysia GDP-real growth Policy 34(15):2388–2397. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2005.04.003
rate and Malaysia GDP-per capita (PPP). http://www.imf.org/ Saidur R, Rahim NA, Masjuki HH, Mekhilef S, Ping HW, Jamaluddin
external/country/mys/index.htmAccessed 10 Sep 2011 MF (2009) End-use energy analysis in the Malaysian industrial
Islam MR, Saidur R, Rahim NA (2011) Assessment of wind energy sector. Energy 34(2):153–158. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2008.11.004
potentiality at Kudat and Labuan, Malaysia using Weibull distribution Saidur R, Islam MR, Rahim NA, Solangi KH (2010) A review on
function. Energy 36(2):985–992. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2010.12.011 global wind energy policy. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14(7):
Katinas V, Karbauskait_e J, Perednis E, Valančius R (2013) Efficiency 1744–1762. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2010.03.007
analysis of combined biomass and solar energy in Lithuania. Saidur R, Rahim NA, Islam MR, Solangi KH (2011) Environmental
Clean Technol Environ Policy 15(4):667–676. doi:10.1007/ impact of wind energy. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15(5):2423–
s10098-012-0534-x 2430. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2011.02.024
Kettha (2008). Ministry of energy telecommunications and multime- Shafie SM, Mahlia TMI, Masjuki HH, Andriyana A (2011) Current
dia (KeTTHA). Solar energy. http://wwwkettha.gov.myAccessed energy usage and sustainable energy in Malaysia: a review.
1 July 2014 Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15(9):4370–4377. doi:10.1016/j.rser.
Khor CS, Lalchand G (2014) A review on sustainable power 2011.07.113
generation in Malaysia to 2030: historical perspective, current Singh AK, Parida SK (2013) Evaluation of current status and future
assessment, and future strategies. Renew Sustain Energy Rev directions of wind energy in India. Clean Technol Environ
29:952–960. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.010 Policy 15(4):643–655. doi:10.1007/s10098-012-0554-6
Lau LC, Tan KT, Lee KT, Mohamed AR (2009) A comparative study Solangi KH, Islam MR, Saidur R, Rahim NA, Fayaz H (2011) A
on the energy policies in Japan and Malaysia in fulfilling their review on global solar energy policy. Renew Sustain Energy Rev
nations’ obligations towards the Kyoto Protocol. Energy Policy 15(4):2149–2163. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2011.01.007
37(11):4771–4778. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.06.034 Štreimikien_e D, Baležentis A (2014) Assessment of willingness to
Lim X-L, Lam W-H (2014) Review on clean development pay for renewables in Lithuanian households. Clean Technol
mechanism (CDM) implementation in Malaysia. Renew Sustain Environ Policy 17:1–17. doi:10.1007/s10098-014-0810-z
Energy Rev 29:276–285. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.106 UNDP (2007) Malaysia generating renewable energy from palm oil wastes.
Majeed AWM, Khalid BS, Ibrahim MZ (2010) reference solar United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), Kuala Lumpur
radiation year and some climatology aspects of East Coast of UNIDO (2014) Renewable energy in industrial applications. United
West Malaysia. Am J Eng Appl Sci 3(2):293–299 nations industrial development organization. http://www.unido.
Malaysia plan (2010) Tenth Malaysia plan 2011–2015. http://www. org/fileadmin/user_media/Services/Energy_and_Climate_Change/
epu.gov.my/html/themes/epu/html/RMKE10/rmke10_english.html Energy_Efficiency/Renewables_%20Industrial_%20Applications.
Accessed 29 Mar 2011 pdfAccessed 12 Dec 2014
Mansor S. A (2008) Keynote address: Powergen Asia conference, Yee KF, Tan KT, Abdullah AZ, Lee KT (2009) Life cycle assessment
Kuala Lumpur. http://www.kettha.gov.my/node/1287 of palm biodiesel: revealing facts and benefits for sustainability.
Mariyappan K (2000b). Country report from Malaysia: status of Appl Energy 86(Suppl1):S189–S196. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.
renewable energy and energy efficiency in Malaysia. www.isep.or. 2009.04.014
jp/spena/2000/countryreports/malaysia.htmAccessed 23 July 2013 Zhi Q, Sun H, Li Y, Xu Y, Su J (2014) China’s solar photovoltaic
Máša V, Bobák P, Kuba P, Stehlı́k P (2013) Analysis of energy policy: an analysis based on policy instruments. Appl Energy
efficient and environmentally friendly technologies in profes- 129:308–319. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.05.014
sional laundry service. Clean Technol Environ Policy 15(3):
445–457. doi:10.1007/s10098-013-0618-2

123

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen