Sie sind auf Seite 1von 58

DESIGN OF COUNTERFORT

ABUTMENT AND FOUNDATION

CONSTRUCTION OF NEW B.G. LINE FROM CHHOTA


UDEPUR TO DHAR
WESTERN RAILWAY

BRIDGE NO 110
3 x 30.5 COMPOSITE GIRDER

SUBMITTED BY,

SM CONSULTANTS,
BHUBANESWAR
CONTENTS

Sl no Descirption

1 ABUTMENT DESIGN

2 FOOTING DESIGN - ABUTMENT


INTRODUCTION CONSTRUCTION OF NEW B.G. LINE FROM CHHOTA UDAIPUR TO DHAR

INTRODUCTION
BRIDGE NO 110

SPAN 3 X 30.5 COMPOSITE GIRDER

Chainage of Abutment 50610


Abutment No A1
Discharge 1452 Cumecs
Velocity 3 m/sec
High Flood Level (HFL) 251.198
Max Scour Depth for Abutment 1.500 m
No of Tracks 1

Soil Particulars
Type of Soil at founding Level Rock

DESIGN PARAMETERS
Grade of Concrete M 35
Grade of Steel Fe 500
Unit weight of Concrete (T/m3) 2.5
Seismic Zone III
Exposure Condition Moderate
Basic Wind Speed 44 m/sec
ABUTMENT DETAILS
Proposed Rail Level 268.001
Proposed Rail Formation Level 267.263
Ground Level 251.038
Theoritical Scour Level 249.698
Rock Level 247.538
B/o Footing Level 246.538
High Flood Level (HFL) 251.198
Low Water Level (LWL) 251.038

SPAN DETAILS

RDSO Drawing No RDSO B 11754


Clear Span on left side 29.5
Effective Span bet c/c of Bearing 31.9
Overall Span 32.45
Span Between C/C of Expansion Joints
32.6
(L)
Bearing Type Elastomeric
` c/c of bearing across traffic 2.4
c/c of bearing along traffic 0.7
RAIL LEV TO B/O GIRDER 3.676
DL (T) for 1 tracks 200.087 (Ref B -11754/4R1)
SIDL (T/M) for 1 tracks 6.2

LOADING ARRANGEMENT

Single span Loaded


Load for Bending Moment for 1
310.97 T
tracks
Load for Shear for 1 tracks 347.95 T

Tractive force for each track 99.96 T


Braking force for each track 70.66 T

S M CONSULTANTS,BHUBANESWAR
ABUTMENT CONSTRUCTION OF NEW B.G. LINE FROM CHHOTA UDAIPUR TO DHAR

DESIGN OF COUNTERFORT ABUTMENT


BRIDGE NO 110 ABUTMENT NO. A1 Span Arrangement
1.0 INTRODUCTION 3 X 30.5 COMPOSITE GIRDER
The abutment system consists of a breast wall with 2 counterforts below the bearings with a monolithic dirt wall and solid
abutment cap.The top dimensions of the abutment cap are fixed so as to fit in the details of Composite Girder
superstucture. The counterforts are designed as columns fixed to the base where as the breast wall is designed as a
continuous slab spanning over the counterforts

2.0 REFERENCES
For the design of the abutment and its different components generally the provisions of IRS(Indian Railway Standards)
Codes have been followed. Followings are the main references.
i. IRS Bridge Rules
ii. IRS Concrete Bridge Code
iii. IRS Substructure and Foundation code

3.0 DESIGN PARAMETERS:


Proposed Rail Level RL 268.001 m
Proposed Rail Formation Level RL 267.263 m
Structural Depth of Girder + Deck Slab 2.938 m (Ref B -11754/4R1)
Bottom of Girder Level RL 264.325 m
Depth of Pedestal + Bearing 0.186 m
Top of Bed Block Level RL 264.139 m
Top of Counterfort Level RL 263.139 m
Ground Level RL 251.038 m
Top of Footing Level RL 248.338 m
Footing bottom level RL 246.538 m
High Flood Level (HFL) RL 251.198 m
Design Discharge 1452.000 cumec
Max Velocity of Flood (m/sec) 3.000 m/sec
Unit wt of concrete 2.5 T/m3
Seismic Zone III

Dimensions of different elements of Abutment :


Width of heel slab = 8.2 m Abut. Shaft thickness at top = 1.35 m
Width of toe slab = 8.2 m Abutment Shaft length = 7.85 m
Breast wall thickness at base = 1.35 m Counterfort Thickness 1.6 m
Abutment cap thick.= 1 m
Thk. of dirt wall at top = 0.600 m
Thk. of dirt wall at bottom = 0.600 m
Slab thk.at toe = 1.800 m
Slab thk. At heel = 1.800 m
Length of abutment cap = 7.85 m
Length of Dirt wall = 7.85 m
Width of abut. Cap = 1.7 m
Width of base slab= 17.75 m
Length of base slab= 7.85 m

4.0 SPAN DETAILS


The Abutment is supporting Composite Girder Superstructure of Effective Span 31.9 m. The Details of Span is given as
under
Type of Bearing used is Elastomeric
4.1 Span 1
Clear Span = 29.500 m
Effective Span bet c/c of Bearing = 31.900 m
Overall Span = 32.450 m
Span Between C/C of Expansion Joints = 32.600 m
Expansion Gap = 0.125 m

4.2 Bearing details


Bearing
Length L 0.55 m c/c distance between bearings = 2.4 m
Breadth B 0.75 m
Depth D 0.106 m
Plate Arrangement
Bottom plate Across traffic = 1180 mm = 1.18 m
Along traffic = 600 mm = 0.6 m
Height = 50 mm = 0.05 m

Top plate Across traffic = 800 mm = 0.8 m


Along traffic = 550 mm = 0.55 m
Height = 40 mm = 0.04 m

S M CONSULTANTS,BHUBANESWAR
ABUTMENT CONSTRUCTION OF NEW B.G. LINE FROM CHHOTA UDAIPUR TO DHAR

0
0
5.0 SKETCHES 267.263
0.6
1.7
C/L of Bearing 3.124
0.025
0.186 0.6 264.139
263.139 1
0 1
1.000 Back Counterfort

Front Counterfort 1.35


3.498

CG of back Counterfort
H2 18.925
9.867 H1
14.801 -0.025 2.848 15.801
251.038
CG of Front Counterfort 3.523
GL 6.53333333 0
1.35 248.338
0 5 5.000 3.200
3.200 8.875
1.8 1.8 C/L of Footing 1.8
246.538
Footing Bottom Level
8.2 1.35 8.2
`

ELEVATION

1.075

1.35 1.925
5 1.7 5

1.6
7.85 8 8.2

10 0.8

0.600 1.6

1.925

1.075 2.000 45

17.75
PLAN

S M CONSULTANTS,BHUBANESWAR
ABUTMENT CONSTRUCTION OF NEW B.G. LINE FROM CHHOTA UDAIPUR TO DHAR

6 LOAD CALCULATION FOR COUNTERFORTS AND BREAST WALL

6.1 DEAD LOAD CALCULATION


Note : Anticlockwise Moments have been Taken as Positive
Eccentricity to the left taken as Positive

6.1.1 Dead Loads from Superstructure Refer Drawing No. - RDSO B 11754
Wt. of Span = 200.087 T
Reaction on each Abutment = 100.044 T
Longitudinal Eccentricity of Reaction w.r.t. C/L of Counterforts, eL1 = 3.498 m
Longitudinal Eccentricity of Reaction w.r.t. C/L of Footing, eL2 = -0.025 m

Longitudinal Moment due to DL about C/L of Counterforts =


100.044 x 3.498 = 349.92 T m
Longitudinal Moment due to DL about C/L of Footing =
100.044 x -0.025 = -2.50 T m

(Note : Please Refer Cl: 2.5.1 of IRS:Bridge Rule for Transverse Eccentricity )

Transverse Eccentricity of Reaction, eT = = 0 m


Transverse Moment due to DL = 100.044 x 0 = 0 T-m

6.1.2 Super Imposed Dead Load (SIDL) from Superstructure


Intensity of SIDL = 6.2 T/m
SIDL Reaction from 32.45 m span = 6.2 x 32.45 / 2 = 100.595 T
Longitudinal Eccentricity of Reaction w.r.t. C/L of Counterforts, eL1 = 3.498 m
Longitudinal Eccentricity of Reaction w.r.t. C/L of Footing, eL2 = -0.025 m
Longitudinal Moment due to SIDL about C/L of Counterforts =
100.595 x 3.498 = 351.847 T - m
Longitudinal Moment due to SIDL about C/L of Footing =
100.595 x -0.025 = -2.515 T - m

(Note : Please Refer Cl: 2.5.1 of IRS:Bridge Rule for Transverse Eccentricity )
Transverse Eccentricity of Reaction, eT = = 0 m
Transverse Moment due to SIDL = 100.595 x 0 = 0 T-m

6.1.3 Dead Load From Abutment Cap


Length of Bed Block = 7.85 m 0.600
Width of Bed Block = 1.7 m
Depth of Bed Block = 1 m 1.7
3.124

0.600
1 1
0

C/L of Bearing C/L of counterfort

1.35
[a] Dead Load of Dirt Wall
Dead Load = 0.5 x 3.124 x (0.6+0.6) x 7.85 x 2.5 = 36.785 T
Eccentricity w.r.t. counterfort CG = 2.798 m
Eccentricity w.r.t. Footing CG = -0.725 m

S M CONSULTANTS,BHUBANESWAR
ABUTMENT CONSTRUCTION OF NEW B.G. LINE FROM CHHOTA UDAIPUR TO DHAR

[b] Dead Load of Abutment Cap - Rectangular portion


Dead Load = 1.7 x 1 x 7.85 x 2.5 = 33.363 T
Eccentricity w.r.t. counterfort CG = 3.348 m
Eccentricity w.r.t. Footing CG = -0.175 m

[c] Dead Load of Plates & Bearing on Abutment Cap 2 nos


Weight of each bearing = 0.481 T
Weight of bearings over abutment = 0.962 T
Eccentricity w.r.t. Counterfort CG = 3.498 m
Eccentricity w.r.t. Footing CG = -0.03 m

[d] Dead Load of Inspection Platform and Railing


Volume of Inspection Plaform
3
= ( 7.85 + 2 x 0.90 + 2 x 1.7 ) x ( 0.20 x 0.90 ) = 2.349 m
Self Weight of Inspection Platform
= 2.349 x 2.5 = 5.873 T
Live Load on inspection Platform @ 250kg/m2 = 2.936 T
Self Weight of Railing = ( 7.85 + 2 x 0.90 + 2 x 1.7 ) x 0.050
(Note : Assume Self Weight of Railing as 50 kg/m ) = 0.653 T
Self Weight of OHE Mast = 1.00 T

Total Dead Load from Abutment Cap including Bearings, Plates, Railing and OHE mast
= 36.785 + 33.363 + 0 + 0.832 + 0.279 + 8.809 + 0.653 + 1 = 81.720 T
Total Longitudinal Moment about CL of Counterforts due to above Dead Load
= 36.785 x 2.798 + 33.363 x 3.348 + 0.962 x 3.498 = 217.964 T - m
Total Longitudinal Moment about CL of Footing due to above Dead Load
= 36.785 x -0.725 + 33.363 x -0.175 + 0.962 x -0.025 = -32.532 T - m

S M CONSULTANTS,BHUBANESWAR
ABUTMENT CONSTRUCTION OF NEW B.G. LINE FROM CHHOTA UDAIPUR TO DHAR

6.1.4. Dead Load of Breast Wall


The Abutment has Rectangular Section.
7.85

TRAFFIC DIRECTION 1.350

Total Height of Breast Wall = 263.139 - 248.338 = 14.801 m


Volume of Stem = ( ( 1.35 +1.35) / 2 ) * 14.8 * 7.85 = 156.854 m3
Dead Load from Stem = 156.854 * 2.5 = 392.134 T
Longitudinal Eccentricity of Reaction w.r.t. C/L of Counterfort, eL1 = 3.523 m
Longitudinal Eccentricity of Reaction w.r.t. C/L of Footing, eL2 = 0.00 m
Longitudinal Moment due to DL of abutment shaft about C/L of Counterfort =
= 3.523 x 392.134 = 1381.356 T-m
Longitudinal Moment due to DL of abutment shaft about C/L of Footing =
= 392.134 x 0 = 0.000 T - m
6.1.5. Dead Load of Back CounterForts
Sectional Area of Counterfort = 39.593 m2
Thickness of counterfort at bottom = 1.600 m
Thickness of counterfort at top = 1.600 m
Average Thickness of stem = ( 1.6 + 1.6) / 2 = 1.600 m

Weight of Two CounterForts = 2 x 39.593 x 1.6 x 2.5


= 316.741 T
Longitudinal Eccentricity of Reaction w.r.t. C/L of Counterforts, eL1 = 0.000 m
Longitudinal Eccentricity of Reaction w.r.t. C/L of Footing, eL2 = -3.523 m
Longitudinal Moment about C/L of Counterforts
= 316.741 x ( 0 ) = 0 T-m
Longitudinal Moment about C/L of Footing
= 316.741 x ( -3.523 ) = -1115.8 T - m

6.1.6. Dead Load of Front CounterForts


Sectional Area of Counterfort = 24.668 m2
Thickness of counterfort at bottom = 1.600 m
Thickness of counterfort at top = 1.600 m
Average Thickness of stem = ( 1.6 + 1.6) / 2 = 1.600 m
Weight of Two CounterForts = 2 x 24.668 x 1.6 x 2.5
= 197.347 T
Longitudinal Eccentricity of Reaction w.r.t. C/L of Counterforts, eL1 = 5.864 m
Longitudinal Eccentricity of Reaction w.r.t. C/L of Footing, eL2 = 2.342 m
Longitudinal Moment about C/L of Counterforts
= 197.347 x ( 5.864 ) = 1157.30602 T-m
Longitudinal Moment about C/L of Footing
= 197.347 x ( 2.342 ) = 462.1 T - m

6.1.7 Dead Load of Wing Wall resting over Footing


Length of Wing Wall over footing = 1.08 m
Depth of Wing Wall at Junction = 2.000 m
Max height at abutment Junction = 18.925 m
Depth of Wing Wall at Footing Edge = 2.000 m
Max height at Footing Edge = 18.388 m
Weight of Two Wing Walls = 200.555 T

Location of CG of Wing wall from toe = 9.200 m

Longitudinal Eccentricity w.r.t. C/L of Counterfort = 3.198 m


Longitudinal Eccentricity w.r.t. C/L of Footing = -0.325 m

S M CONSULTANTS,BHUBANESWAR
ABUTMENT CONSTRUCTION OF NEW B.G. LINE FROM CHHOTA UDAIPUR TO DHAR

Longitudinal Moment Due to DL of Wing Wall about C/L of Counterfort


= 200.555 x ( 3.198 ) = 641.306 T - m
Longitudinal Moment Due to DL of Fly Wing about C/L of Footing
= 200.555 x ( -0.325 ) = -65.180 T - m

6.1.8 Dead Load of Footing


Length of Footing (perpendicular to track) = 10.000 m
Width of Footing (parallel to track) = 17.750 m
Depth of Footing tapered depth = 0.000 m
edge depth 1.800 m
Longitudinal Direction
17.750

10.000

Traffic Direction
PLAN of Footing

3
Volume = 385.749 m

Weight of Footing at LWL ( Without Considering buoyancy) = 964.373 T


Weight of footing at HFL ( Considering 100% buoyancy) = 578.624 T

6.2 LIVE LOAD CALCULATION

6.2.1 VERTICAL LIVE LOAD CALCULATIONS


Standard of Loading 25T LOADING - 2008
(Note : Please Refer Appendix XXIII of IRS:Bridge Rule )
Loaded Length (Edge to Edge of Superstructure) = 32.450 m
Total EUDL Load (Shear) for 32.45m span = 347.951 T
Longitudinal Eccentricity w.r.t C/L of Counterfort, eL1 = 3.498 m
Longitudinal Eccentricity of Reaction w.r.t. C/L of Footing, eL2 = -0.025 m
Transverse Eccentricity w.r.t. C/L of Counterfort, eT = 0.100 m
(Note : Please Refer Cl: 2.5.1 of IRS:Bridge Rule for Transverse Eccentricity )

Computation of CDA
(Note:Please refer clause 2.4.1.1 (a) of IRS:Bridge Rule )
CDA = (0.15 + [ 8 / (6 + L)]) Subject to Maximum of 1.0
Depth of fill = 0.35 m Therefore, CDA = 0.358

Total Live Load (Shear) with CDA = 347.951 x (1 + 0.358 )


= 472.539 T
Live Load Reaction on Abutment = 472.539 / 2.0 = 236.269 T
Longitudinal Moment due to LL on Abutment, ML =
236.269 x 3.498 = 826.391 T - m
Transverse Moment due to LL on Abutment, MT =
236.269 x 0.1 = 23.627 T - m

S M CONSULTANTS,BHUBANESWAR
ABUTMENT CONSTRUCTION OF NEW B.G. LINE FROM CHHOTA UDAIPUR TO DHAR

For Design of Foundations (Shallow Foundation)

Therefore, CDA for Foundation = 0.358


Total Live Load Reaction =
347.951 x (1 + 0.358 ) = 472.538837 T
Live Load Reaction on Abutment without CDA
= 472.539 / 2.0 = 236.269419 T
Longitudinal Moment due to LL with CDA on Footing, ML
= 236.269 x -0.025 = -5.907 T - m
Transverse Moment due to LL with CDA on Footing, MT
= 236.269 x 0.1 = 23.627 T - m

6.2.2 HORIZONTAL LOAD CALCULATION


TRACTIVE EFFORT/BRAKING FORCE
(Please Refer Appendix XXIV of IRS Bridge Rules )
Loaded Length (Edge to Edge of Superstructure) = 32.450 m
Tractive Force for 32.45 m Loaded Span = 99.960 T
Braking Force for 32.45 m Loaded Span = 70.660 T
Net longitudinal force for single track is max of tractive & braking = 99.960 T
Dispersion of Longitudinal Force = 0.000 %
(Refer to clause 2.8.3.4 IRS Bridge Rules)
Net Longitudinal Force = 99.96 x ( 1.0 - 0 / 100 ) = 99.960 T

Type of Bearing = ELASTOMERIC


Percent Force Transferred to Abutment = 50.000 %
(Refer to clause no 2.8.2.4.1 IRS bridge rules - 2008)
Therefore, Net Longitudinal Force Transferred to Abutment = 49.980 T

6.2.3 FRICTIONAL RESISTANCE DUE TO BEARING


(Please Refer Cl:5.6.2 of IRS:Bridge & Substructure Code & Cl:2.8 of IRS:Bridge Rule)

Coefficient of Friction = 0.1


Total Frictional Force = 0.1 x ( 100.044 + 100.595 + 236.269 )
= 43.6907919 T

Frictional Force = 43.69079 T < 49.980 T Tractive/Braking Force


Hence, Governing Force will be . Tractive/Braking Force 49.980 T

Lever Arm w.r.t. Base of Counterfort = 15.801 + 0.186 = 15.987 m


Lever Arm w.r.t. Bottom of Footing = 15.987 + 1.8 = 17.787 m

Moment about Base of Counterfort = 49.98 x 15.987 = 799.03026 T - m


Moment about Bottom of Footing = 49.98 x 17.787 = 888.99426 T - m

S M CONSULTANTS,BHUBANESWAR
ABUTMENT CONSTRUCTION OF NEW B.G. LINE FROM CHHOTA UDAIPUR TO DHAR

6.3 EARTH PRESSURE


6.3.1 ACTIVE EARTH PRESSURE DUE TO BACKFILL
Note : Please Refer CL. 5.7.1 Of IRS : Substructure & Foundation Code.
Properties of Back Fill
φ = 35 0
= 0.611 radians
0
i = 0 = 0.000 radians
δ = 11.67 0
= 0.204 radians
α = 0 0
= 0.000 radians
γ = 2.00 T / m3 (Moist Backfill)

Coefficient of Active Earth Pressure


cos2 ( φ - α)
Ka =
cos2 α cos ( δ + α) 1+ sin ( φ + δ) sin(φ - i) 2
cos ( δ + α) cos (α-i)
= 0.251

267.263
(FORMATION LEVEL)

18.925
20.725

248.338 9.495
1.800 (TOP OF Footing)
246.538 10.398
(BOTTOM OF Footing)
AT Base of Counterfort
Earth Pressure Intensity at Wall Base = Ka γ H1
= 0.251 x 2 x 18.925 = 9.495 T / m2
Earth Pressure Intensity at Intermediate height H2
= Ka γ H2
= 0.251 x 2 x 9.867 = 4.950 T / m2
Note: - It is assumed that earth pressure acting on breast wall portion is also taken up by the counterforts

Total Load on Counterforts = 0.50 x 9.495 x 18.925 x 7.85 = 705.267 T


Lever Arm w.r.t. Wall Base = 18.925 / 3.0 = 6.308 m

Moment About Base of Counterfort = = 4449.05807 T/m

6.3.2 ACTIVE EARTH PRESSURE DUE TO SURCHARGE EFFECT


Note : Please Refer CL. 5.8.2 Of IRS : Substructure & Foundation Code.
Dead Load Surcharge for each track V = 6.20 T/m
Live Load Surchage for each track S = 13.70 T/m
Surcharge Width at Formation Level B = 3.00 m
Total Width for action of surcharge pressure L = 7.85 m
Height of Counterfort H = 18.925 m

L-B = 7.85 - 3 = 4.850 m

THEREFORE, H > ( L - B )
(FORMATION LEVEL) 3.328

P1 4.85
18.925
0.636 P2
14.08 15.88
(TOP OF Footing)
(BOTTOM OF Footing) 1.800 P3

0.636

S M CONSULTANTS,BHUBANESWAR
ABUTMENT CONSTRUCTION OF NEW B.G. LINE FROM CHHOTA UDAIPUR TO DHAR

Pressure at Top = [ (S + V ) / B ] Ka x No of tracks


= [ ( 13.7 + 6.2 ) / 3 ] x 0.251 x 1
= 3.33 T / m2
Pressure at h i.e. 18.925 m below from Top
= [ (S + V ) / (L) ] Ka x No of tracks
= [ ( 13.7 + 6.2 ) / (7.85 ) ] x 0.251 x 1
= 0.64 T / m2

Pressure at h i.e. 20.725 m below from Top


= [ (S + V ) / (L)] Ka x No of tracks
= [ ( 13.7 + 6.2 ) / (7.85 ) ] x 0.251 x 1
= 0.64 T / m2

P1 = ( 3.328 + 0.636 ) x 4.85


= 9.612 T/m
CG = ( 4.85 / 3 ) x ( 2 x 3.328 + 0.636 ) / ( 3.328 + 0.636 )
= 2.974 m
P2 = 0.636 x 14.075
= 8.950 T/m
CG = 14.075 / 2
= 7.037 m
P3 = 0.636 x 1.8
= 1.145 T/m
CG = 1.8 / 2
= 0.900 m

AT Base of Counterfort Wall


Total Horizontal Force at Base of Counterfort Wall
= P1 x L + P2 x L
= (9.612 x 7.85)+ (8.95 x 7.85) = 145.717 T

Moment about Base of Counterfort Wall


= [ 9.612 x ( 2.974 + 14.075 ) + 8.95 x 7.037 ] x 7.85 = 1780.92 T - m

6.4 VERTICAL LOAD DUE TO EARTH


6.4.1 VERTICAL LOAD DUE TO BACKFILL ON FOUNDATION
a Height of back fill behind breast wall (In Formation) = 18.925 m
Length of backfill behind abutment in Trans. Direction = 4.65 m
Length of backfill behind abutment in Long. Direction = 7.9 m
Volume of earth = 690.81 m3
Weight of Backfill between counterforts = 1381.61963 T
Eccentricity w.r.t. CG of Foundation = = -4.950 m

b Length of backfill beyond counterforts in Long. Direction = 3.20 m


Length of backfill beyond counterforts in Trans. Direction = 7.85 m
Volume of earth = 475.40 m3
Weight of Backfill between counterforts = 950.792 T
Eccentricity w.r.t. CG of Foundation = = -7.275 m

c Sectional Area over the counterforts = 114.148925 m2


Total width of the counterforts = 3.2 m
Volume of earth = 365.28 m3
Weight of Backfill over counterforts = 730.55312 T
Eccentricity w.r.t. CG of Counterforts = = -2.267 m
Eccentricity w.r.t. CG of Foundation = = -5.790 m

d Sectional Area behind breast wall = 5.18035 m2


Length of backfill behind abutment in Trans. Direction = 4.65 m
Volume of earth = 24.09 m3
Weight of Backfill = 48.177255 T
Eccentricity w.r.t. CG of Foundation = = -0.850 m

3
e Vol of EW beyond formation 7.85 width resting over footing = 328.909687 m
Weight of Backfill = 657.819375 T
Eccentricity w.r.t. CG of Foundation = = -4.775 m

S M CONSULTANTS,BHUBANESWAR
ABUTMENT CONSTRUCTION OF NEW B.G. LINE FROM CHHOTA UDAIPUR TO DHAR

Total Volume of Earth of footing = 1884.48 m3


Weight of Backfill = 3768.96137 T

Moment about C/L of Counterfort Wall = -1656.5201 T-m


Moment about C/L of Footing = -21168.08 T-m

6.4.2 VERTICAL LOAD DUE TO DEAD LOAD & LIVE LOAD SURCHARGE
Intensity of DL & LL Surcharge on Footing
= 13.7 + 6.2 = 19.900 T / m
Vertical Load due to DL & LL surcharge = 19.9 x 8.2 = 163.180 T

Eccentricity w.r.t. CG of Footing = = -4.950 m


Longitudinal Moment about CG of Footing =
163.18 x ( -4.95 ) = -807.741 T - m

6.4.3 VERTICAL LOAD DUE TO FRONT EARTHFILL


Spilling Length in front of Abutment = 8.2 m
Height of Spilling Earth = 2.700 m
Vertical Load Due to Front Earthfill
= ( 8.2 x 7.85 x 2.7 ) x 2 = 442.800 T
Subtract weight of front counterfort = 91.582 T
Net Weight Downward = 351.218 T
Eccentricity w.r.t. CG of Footing e2 = 4.78 m
Longitudinal Moment about CG of Footing = 442.8 x 4.775 = 1677.065 T-m

6.5 SEISMIC FORCES


(Note : Please refer Cl : 2.12 of IRS:Bridge Rule and Cl:5.12.2 of IRS:Bridge Substructure & Foundation Code. However,
Seismic Forces have been calculated base on IS:1893 (Part 3):2014)
Bridge Rules IS 1893- pt 3
Seismic Zone = III Zone Factor Z= 0.16
Basic Seismic Coefficient α0 0.04 Importance Factor I= 1
Horizontal Force H = W x αh Response Reduction Factor R= 2.5
Coefficient for soil foundation system (β) = 1 Acceleration coefficient Sa/g = 2.5
Importance Factor (I) = 1
Basic Horizontal Seismic Coefficient = 0.04

Horizontal Seismic Coefficient αh = β I α0 0.040 αh = ( Z / 2 ) ( I / R ) ( Sa / g ) = 0.080

Vertical Seismic Coefficient αv = 0.5 x αh 0.020 αv = ( 2 / 3 ) Ah = 0.053

Design Horizontal Seismic Coefficient αh = 0.080


Design Vertical Seismic Coefficient αv = 0.053

6.5.1 ON SUPERSTRUCTURE DL
Longitudinal Direction
(Note : Seismic Force will act at Top of Bearings)
Horizontal Seismic Force
= 0.08 x 100.044 = 8.003 T
Lever Arm w.r.t. Base of Counterfort = 264.139 + 0.186 - 248.338 = 15.987 m
Lever Arm w.r.t. Bottom of Footing = 264.139 + 0.186 - 246.538 = 17.787 m

Moment about Base of Counterfort = 8.003 x 15.987 = 127.952 T - m


Moment about Bottom of Footing = 8.003 x 17.787 = 142.358 T - m

Transverse Direction
(Note : Seismic Force will act at CG of Superstructure)
Superstructure span CG Level
= 264.139 + 0.186 + 2.938 / 2.0 = 265.794 m
Lever Arm w.r.t. Base of Counterfort = 265.794 - 248.338 = 17.456 m
Lever Arm w.r.t. Bottom of Footing = 265.794 - 246.538 = 19.256 m

Moment about Base of Counterfort = 8.003 x 17.456 = 139.709 T - m


Moment about Bottom of Footing = 8.003 x 19.256 = 154.115 T - m

S M CONSULTANTS,BHUBANESWAR
ABUTMENT CONSTRUCTION OF NEW B.G. LINE FROM CHHOTA UDAIPUR TO DHAR

6.5.2 ON SUPERIMPOSED DEAD LOAD (SIDL)


Longitudinal Direction
(Note : Seismic Force will act at Top of Bearings)
Horizontal Seismic Force (c/c Bearing) Span
= 0.08 x 100.595 = 8.048 T
Lever Arm w.r.t. Base of Counterfort = 264.139 + 0.186 - 248.338 = 15.987 m
Lever Arm w.r.t. Bottom of Footing = 264.139 + 0.186 - 246.538 = 17.787 m
Moment about Base of Counterfort = 8.048 x 15.987 = 128.657 T-m
Moment about Bottom of Footing = 8.048 x 17.787 = 143.143 T-m

Transverse Direction
(Note : Seismic Force will act at Rail Level)
Lever Arm w.r.t. Base of Counterfort = 268.001 - 248.338 = 19.663 m
Lever Arm w.r.t. Bottom of Footing = 268.001 - 246.538 = 21.463 m
Moment about Base of Counterfort = 8.048 x 19.663 = 158.240 T-m
Moment about Bottom of Footing = 8.048 x 21.463 = 172.726 T-m

6.5.3 ON ABUTMENT CAP


[ a ] Dirt Wall
Horizontal Seismic Force = 0.08 x 36.785 = 2.943 T
Distance of C.G. of Dirt Wall From B/O of Dirt Wall = 3.124 / 2.0 = 1.562 m
Lever Arm w.r.t. Counterfort Base = 264.139 + 1.562 - 248.338 = 17.363 m
Lever Arm w.r.t. Bottom of Footing = 264.139 + 1.562 - 246.538 = 19.163 m

[ b ] Abutment Cap
Horizontal Seismic Force = 0.08 x 33.363 = 2.669 T
Distance of C.G. From B/O of Abutment Cap = 1 / 2.0 = 0.500 m
Lever Arm w.r.t. Counterfort Base = 263.139 + 0.5 - 248.338 = 15.301 m
Lever Arm w.r.t. Bottom of Footing = 263.139 + 0.5 - 246.538 = 17.101 m

[ c ] Plates & Bearings


Horizontal Seismic Force = 0.08 x 1.111 = 0.077 T
Distance of C.G. From T/O of Abutment Cap = 0.186 / 2.0 = 0.093 m
Lever Arm w.r.t. Counterfort Base = 264.139 + 0.093 - 248.338 = 15.894 m
Lever Arm w.r.t. Bottom of Footing = 264.139 + 0.093 - 246.538 = 17.694 m

Total Horizontal Load Due to Abutment Cap Components = 2.943 + 2.669 + 0.077
= 5.689 T
Moment about Base of Counterfort = 2.943 x 17.363 + 2.669 x 15.301 + 0.077 x 15.894
= 93.158 T - m
Moment about Bottom of Footing = 2.943 x 19.163 + 2.669 x 17.101 + 0.077 x 17.694
= 103.397 T - m

6.5.4 ON BREAST WALL


Horizontal Seismic Force = 0.08 x 392.134 = 31.371 T
Level of C. G. of Abutment (RL) = ( 263.139 + 248.338 ) / 2.0 = 255.739 m
Lever Arm w.r.t. Counterfort Base = 255.739 - 248.338 = 7.400 m
Lever Arm w.r.t to Bottom of Footing = 255.739 - 246.538 = 9.201 m

Moment about Base of Counterfort = 31.371 x 7.4 = 232.159 T - m


Moment about Bottom of Footing = 31.371 x 9.201 = 288.626 T - m

6.5.5 ON BACK COUNTERFORT WALL


Horizontal Seismic Force = 0.08 x 316.741 = 25.339 T

Lever Arm w.r.t. Counterfort Base = 5.256 m


Lever Arm w.r.t to Bottom of Footing = 7.056 m

Moment about Base of Counterfort = 25.339 x 5.256 = 133.194 T - m


Moment about Bottom of Footing = 25.339 x 7.056 = 178.805 T - m

6.5.6 ON FRONT COUNTERFORT WALL


Horizontal Seismic Force = 0.08 x 316.741 = 15.788 T

Lever Arm w.r.t. Counterfort Base = 3.289 m


Lever Arm w.r.t to Bottom of Footing = 5.089 m

Moment about Base of Counterfort = 15.788 x 3.289 = 51.928 T - m


Moment about Bottom of Footing = 15.788 x 5.089 = 80.346 T - m

S M CONSULTANTS,BHUBANESWAR
ABUTMENT CONSTRUCTION OF NEW B.G. LINE FROM CHHOTA UDAIPUR TO DHAR

6.5.7 ON FOOTING
Horizontal Seismic Force = 0.08 x 964.373 = 77.150 T
Level of C.G. of Footing (RL) = ( 248.338 + 246.538 ) / 2.0 = 247.438 m
Lever Arm w.r.t. to Bottom of Footing = 247.438 - 246.538 = 0.900 m
Moment about Bottom of Footing = 77.15 x 0.9 = 69.435 T-m

6.5.8 SUMMARY OF SEISMIC FORCES DUE TO DEAD LOADS


Total Horizontal Seismic Force on Counterfort due to Dead Loads
= 8.003 + 8.048 + 5.689 + 31.371 = 21.740 T
Total Horizontal Seismic Force on Footing due to Dead Loads
= 21.74 + 25.339 + 15.788 + 77.15 = 140.017 T
Total Longitudinal Moment about Base of Counterfort due to Dead Loads
= 127.952 + 128.657 + 93.158 + 232.159 = 581.925 T - m
Total Longitudinal Moment about Bottom of Footing due to Dead Loads
= 142.358 + 143.143 + 103.397 + 288.626 + 178.805 + 80.346 + 69.435 = 1006.110 T -m
Total Transverse Moment about Base of Counterfort due to Dead Loads
= 139.709 + 158.24 + 93.158 + 232.159 = 623.265 T - m
Total Transverse Moment about Bottom of Footing due to Dead Loads
= 154.115 + 172.726 + 103.397 + 288.626 + 178.805 + 80.346 + 69.435 = 1047.450 T -m

6.5.9 ON 50% LIVE LOAD IN TRANSVERSE DIRECTION


Horizontal Seismic Force = [ 236.269 / ( 1 + 0.358 ) ] x 0.50 x 0.08 = 6.959 T
Point of Application of the Force (RL) 268.001 + 3.0 = 271.001 m
(Note: Height of CG of Live Load above Rail Level is 3.0 m)
Lever Arm w.r.t. Base of Counterfort = 271.001 - 248.338 = 22.663 m
Lever Arm w.r.t. Bottom of Footing = 271.001 - 246.538 = 24.463 m
Moment about Base of Counterfort = 6.959 x 22.663 = 157.712 T-m
Moment about Bottom of Footing = 6.959 x 24.463 = 170.238 T-m

6.5.10 SEISMIC FORCES IN VERTICAL DIRECTION DUE TO DEAD LOADS


Seismic Force on Abutment due to Dead Loads in Vertical Direction
= 21.74 x 0.053 / 0.08 = 14.493 T
Seismic Force on Footing due to Dead Loads in Vertical Direction
= 140.017 x 0.053 / 0.08 = 93.344 T

6.5.11 SEISMIC FORCES IN VERTICAL DIRECTION DUE TO LIVE LOADS


Seismic Force due to Live Load in Vertical Direction
= 6.959 x 0.053 / 0.08 = 4.639 T

6.6 DYNAMIC INCREMENT OF EARTH PRESSURE


Note : Please Refer Cl. 5.12.6 Of IRS:Substructure & Foundation Code

αh = 0.0800 φ = 35 degrees = 0.611 radians


αv = 0.0533 δ = 11.67 degrees = 0.204 radians
α = 0 degrees = 0.000 radians
i = 0 degrees = 0.000 radians
For +ve αv
λ = tan -1 [ αh / ( 1 + αv ) ]
= 0.0758 radians = 4.343 degrees
For -ve αv
λ = tan -1 [ αh / ( 1 - αv ) ]
= 0.0843 radians = 4.830 degrees

Active Earth Pressure Coefficient


(1+ αV) cos2 (φ - α - λ) 1 2
Ca =
cos λ cos2 α cos(δ + α + λ) 1 + sin(φ + δ) sin(φ − i − λ)
cos(δ + α + λ) cos(α - i)

λ Ca
0.309 Therefore, Coefficient of Dynamic Increment
0.076
0.278 Ca = Max (0.309 , 0.278 , 0.315 , 0.283 )
0.315 = 0.315
0.084
0.283

S M CONSULTANTS,BHUBANESWAR
ABUTMENT CONSTRUCTION OF NEW B.G. LINE FROM CHHOTA UDAIPUR TO DHAR

6.6.1 DYNAMIC INCREMENT DUE TO ACTIVE EARTH PRESSURE OF BACKFILL


AT Base of Counterfort Wall
Increment in Earth pressure coefficient = 0.064
Increment in Force = [ ( 0.064 ) / 0.251 ] x 705.267
= 180.296 T
Lever Arm w.r.t. Wall Base = 18.925 / 2.0 = 9.462 m
Increment in Moment About Base of Counterfort = 1706.1 T/m

6.6.2 DYNAMIC INCREMENT DUE TO ACTIVE EARTH PRESSURE OF SURCHARGE

Increment in Surcharge pressure coefficient = 0.064


Increment in Force = [ ( 0.064 ) / 0.251 ] x 145.717
= 37.252 T
Lever Arm w.r.t. Wall Base = 18.925 / 2.0 = 9.462 m
Increment in Moment About Base of Counterfort = 352.5 T/m

6.7 WIND FORCE CALCULATION:


Refer IS:875-Part 3

Basic Wind Speed VB = 44 m/s


(Refer Cl 5.3)
Design Wind Speed VZ = (K1 x K2 x K3 ) X VB
(Ref. Cl. 5.3.1 table 1 of IS:875 (Part-3) - 1987)
K1 = Probability Factor = 1.07

H = (top of locomotive)-(Bottom of exposed surface)


Rail Level = = 268.001 m
Level of Top of locomotive = 268.001+0.6+4.15 = 272.751 m
Bottom of exposed surface = 251.038
H = 268.001-251.038 = 16.963 m

For Class and Terrain Category H = 16.963 m

K2 = Terrain, Height and Structure Size Factor = 1.07


(Ref. Cl. 5.3.1 table 1 of IS:875 (Part-3) - 1987)
K3 = 1 (As avg. Ground Profile is < 3 degree)
VZ = (1.07 x 1.07 x 1 ) x 44 = 50.3756 m/s

Reffer CL. 5.4 of IS:875


2
Pz = 0.6 VZ2 = 0.6 x 50.3756 x 50.3756 = 1522.62065 N/m
= 155.211075 kg/m2
So, design wind pressure = 0.155 T/m2
(As wind pressure> 150 kg/m2,, from Cl 2.11.2 of IRS Bridge Rules)

So use design wind pressure = 0.150 T/m2

6.7.1 ON SUPERSTRCTURE
Total Depth of Superstructure = 3.676 m
Towards A1
Wind Force on Superstructure = 0.15 x 3.68 x 32.45 x 0.5 = 8.946 T
Towards A2
Wind Force on Superstructure = 0.15 x 3.68 x 32.45 x 0.5 = 8.946 T

Eccentricity wrt base of Counterfort = ( 264.325 + 2.938 /2) - 248.338


= 17.456 m
Moment wrt base of Counterfort = 8.946 x 17.456 = 156.169 Tm

Eccentricity wrt base of Footing = 17.456 + 1.8 = 19.256 m


Moment wrt base of Footing = 8.946 x 19.256 = 172.273 Tm

S M CONSULTANTS,BHUBANESWAR
ABUTMENT CONSTRUCTION OF NEW B.G. LINE FROM CHHOTA UDAIPUR TO DHAR

6.7.2 ON LIVE LOAD


CASE A FULL LIVE LOAD

4.15

0.6 268.001 RAIL LEVEL

Wind force on Abutment = (0.15 x 4.15 x 32.45 )/2 = 10.100 T


Eccentricity wrt base of Counterfort = ( 268.001 + 0.6 + 4.15 /2) - 248.338
= 22.338 m
Moment wrt base of Counterfort = 10.1 x 22.338 = 225.615196 Tm

Eccentricity wrt base of Footing = 22.338 + 1.8 = 24.138 m


Moment wrt base of Footing = 10.1 x 24.138 = 243.795309 Tm

CASE B Live load behind the Abutment Wall not on Super Structure
In this case Wind force,acting on live load need not to be considered as there
is no Live Load on the Super Structure
So, Wind force on Abutment = 0 T

6.8 LWR FORCES CALCULATION


Simply supported deck with one elastic fixed support and no expansion device.

6.8.1 Parameters
Deck length L = 32.45 m
Coefficient of thermal expansion α = 1.17 x 10^-5 (Cl 2.6.2 Bridge Rules)
Temp variation of rails ΔT = ±50 ˚C (Cl 1.4.2 UIC 774-3R)
Temp variation of deck ΔT = ±35 ˚C (Cl 1.4.2 UIC 774-3R)

Deflection max. = 45.500 mm


[Refer Note no. 22 of RDSO / B- 11754 / R1 ]

Rotation of cross section at the end of the deck


Φ = TAN-1 ( 45.5 * π ) / ( 16225 * 180) = 0.00280 radians
Horizontal displacement of the deck due to roation at the end section of the deck
ΦH = 0.0028 x 3676 = 10.309 mm

Stiffness of fixed support K

For 32.45 m deck length, tractive forces from bridge rules = 99.96 T
For 32.45 m deck length, braking forces from bridge rules = 70.66 T

Net force will be max of tractive and braking force = 99.96 T

The reaction on abutment = 49.98 T


Hence force per metre = 1.540 T/m
= 15.402 KN/m

Reduction Factor β = 0.600


[From Table 1 of UIC 774-3R]

Stiffness Factor K = 15.4 x 0.6 x 32.45 / 5 = 59.976


= 59.976 / 32.45
= 1.85 L

S M CONSULTANTS,BHUBANESWAR
ABUTMENT CONSTRUCTION OF NEW B.G. LINE FROM CHHOTA UDAIPUR TO DHAR

min K = 20 x 0.6 x 32.45 / 5 = 77.88


2.4 L

So use K = 2.4 L

Interaction effects
1 Interaction forces due to temperature variations (Unloaded Condition)
ΔT deck = ±35 ˚C
K = 2.40 L
k = 25 KN/mm2 = k25
[Refer cl 2.8.2.4.3 (d) of bridge rules for k values]
L = 32.450 m
The following values have been read from the fig. 4, 5 and 6 of app. A
so σrail (fixed) [ΔT] for K2.4k25 = 4.0 N/mm2 [Fig 4, Appendix A]

σrail (moveble) [ΔT] for K2.4k25 = 11.0 N/mm2 [Fig 5, Appendix A]

S M CONSULTANTS,BHUBANESWAR
ABUTMENT CONSTRUCTION OF NEW B.G. LINE FROM CHHOTA UDAIPUR TO DHAR

Horizontal support reaction


F (support) [ΔT] for K2.4k25 = 230.0 KN
[Fig 6, Appendix A]

2 Interaction forces due to Braking effects (Loaded Condition)


K = 2.40 L
k = 50 KN/mm2 = k50
[Refer cl 2.8.2.4.3 (d) of bridge rules for k values]
L = 32.45 m
Figs in App A are drawn for the braking load case = 20.0 KN/m

The following values have been read from the fig. 1, 2 and 3 of app. A
so σrail (fixed) [Braking] for K2.4k50 = 17.0 N/mm2 [Fig 1, Appendix A]

S M CONSULTANTS,BHUBANESWAR
ABUTMENT CONSTRUCTION OF NEW B.G. LINE FROM CHHOTA UDAIPUR TO DHAR

σrail (moveble) [Braking] for K2.4k50 = 17.0 N/mm2 [Fig 2, Appendix A]

Horizontal support reaction


F (support) [braking] for
K2.4k50 = 120 KN
[Fig 3, Appendix A]

Considering braking force of 30.804 kN/m for present case = 92.413 KN

S M CONSULTANTS,BHUBANESWAR
ABUTMENT CONSTRUCTION OF NEW B.G. LINE FROM CHHOTA UDAIPUR TO DHAR

3 Interaction forces due to Vertical Bending of deck

ΦH = 10.3 mm
K = 2.40 L
L = 32.45 m

ϒ = 0.5 / K2.4 interpolate between 0.5/K2 and 0.5/K5

The following values have been read from the fig. 1, 3 and 5 of app. B

σrail (fixed) [8mm] = 22.000 N/mm2 ( Tension)


[Fig 1, Appendix B]

σrail (movable) [8mm] = -6.000 N/mm2 (Compression)


[Fig 3, Appendix B]

S M CONSULTANTS,BHUBANESWAR
ABUTMENT CONSTRUCTION OF NEW B.G. LINE FROM CHHOTA UDAIPUR TO DHAR

Now σrail (fixed) [10.3mm] = 22 x ( 10.3 / 8 )^ 0.86 = 27.340 N/mm2

σrail (movable) [10.3mm] = 6 x ( 10.3 / 8 )^ 0.86 = 7.456 N/mm2

Horizontal support reaction


K = 2.40 L
L = 32.45 m

For ϒ = 0.5 / K2.4

F (support) [8mm] = 230.00 KN [Fig 5, Appendix B]

F (support) [10.3mm] = 230 x ( 10.3 / 8 )^ 0.86 = 285.83 KN


(Cl 2.1.2.2 UIC 774-3R)
F(support) [10.3mm] = 285.83 KN

VERIFICATION OF σrail
[Refer to cl 1.5.1 and1.6.2.1 of UIC 774-3R]
according to code for simply supported decks use α = 1 , β = 1 , ϒ = 1

i. α * σrail (fixed) [ΔT] + β * σrail (fixed) [Braking] + ϒ * σrail (fixed) [10.3mm]


= ( 1 x 4) + (1 x 17) + (1 x 27.34 )
<
2
= 48.34 N/mm 75 N/mm2 ok

ii. α * σrail (mov) [ΔT] + β * σrail (mov) [Braking] + ϒ * σrail (movable) [10.3mm]
= ( 1 x 11) + (1 x 17) + (1 x 7.456 )
<
2
= 35.456 N/mm 50 N/mm2 ok

Support reactions
1 F (support) [ΔT] = 230.0 kN
2 F (support) [braking] = 92.413 kN
3 F (support) [10.3mm] = 285.832 kN

F(support) [Total] = ( 1 x 230) + (1 x 92.413) + (1 x 285.832 )


= 608.245 KN
= 60.8245 T

S M CONSULTANTS,BHUBANESWAR
ABUTMENT CONSTRUCTION OF NEW B.G. LINE FROM CHHOTA UDAIPUR TO DHAR

So Support reactions on the abutment due to LWR forces 60.825 T

Lever Arm w.r.t. Base of Counterfort = 264.139 + 0.186 - 248.338 = 15.987 m

Lever Arm w.r.t. Bottom of Footing = 264.139 + 0.186 - 246.538 = 17.787 m

Moment about Base of Counterfort = 60.825 x 15.987 = 972.409 T-m


Moment about Bottom of Footing = 60.825 x 17.787 = 1081.894 T-m

7 SUMMARY OF LOAD AND MOMENT

7.1 AT CG of COUNTERFORTS
LOAD No LOAD DESCRIPTION VL ML MT HL HT
6.1 DEAD LOAD
6.1.1 Superstructure 100.04 349.92 0.00 0.00 0.00
6.1.2 SIDL 100.60 351.85 0.00 0.00 0.00
6.1.3 Abutment Cap 81.72 217.96 0.00 0.00 0.00
6.1.4. Breast Wall 392.13 1381.36 0.00 0.00 0.00
6.1.5. Back Counterforts 316.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6.2 LIVE LOAD
6.2.1 Vertical Live Load 236.27 826.39 23.63 0.00 0.00
6.2.2 Horizontal Live Load 0.00 799.03 0.00 49.98 0.00
6.3 EARTH PRESSURE
6.3.1 AEP-Backfill 0.00 4449.06 0.00 705.27 0.00
6.3.2 AEP-Surcharge 0.00 1780.92 0.00 145.72 0.00
6.4 VERT LOAD DUE TO EARTH
6.4.1 Due to backfill 730.55 -1656.52 0.00 0.00 0.00
6.4.2 Due to DL & LL surcharge 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6.4.3 Due to Front earthfill 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6.5 SEISMIC FORCES
6.5.1 On Superstructure DL 4.00 127.95 139.71 8.00 8.00
6.5.2 On SIDL 4.02 128.66 158.24 8.05 8.05
6.5.3 On Abutment Cap 2.84 93.16 93.16 5.69 5.69
6.5.4 On Breast Wall 15.69 232.16 232.16 31.37 31.37
6.5.4 On Back Counterfort 12.67 133.19 133.19 25.34 25.34
6.5.5 50% LL in Trasverse direc 3.48 0.00 157.71 0.00 6.96
6.6 DYNAMIC INCREMENT OF AEP
6.6.1 Of Backfill 1706.05 180.30
6.6.2 Of Surcharge 352.49 37.25
6.7 WIND FORCE
6.7.1 On super structure 0.00 0.00 156.17 0.00 8.95
6.7.2 On live load 0.00 0.00 225.62 0.00 10.10
6.8 LWR FORCES
0.00 972.41 0.00 60.83 0.00

S M CONSULTANTS,BHUBANESWAR
ABUTMENT CONSTRUCTION OF NEW B.G. LINE FROM CHHOTA UDAIPUR TO DHAR

7.2 AT CG of Footing
LOAD No LOAD DESCRIPTION VL ML MT HL HT
6.1 DEAD LOAD
6.1.1 Superstructure 100.04 -2.50 0.00 0.00 0.00
6.1.2 SIDL 100.60 -2.51 0.00 0.00 0.00
6.1.3 Abutment Cap 81.72 -32.53 0.00 0.00 0.00
6.1.4. Breast Wall 392.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6.1.5 Back Counterforts 316.74 -1115.77 0.00 0.00 0.00
6.1.6 Front Counterforts 197.35 462.12 0.00 0.00 0.00
6.1.7 Wing wall 200.55 -65.18 0.00 0.00 0.00
6.1.8 Footing 964.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6.2 LIVE LOAD
6.2.1 Vertical Live Load 236.27 -5.91 23.63 0.00 0.00
6.2.2 Horizontal Live Load 0.00 888.99 0.00 49.98 0.00
6.3 EARTH PRESSURE
6.3.1 AEP-Backfill 0.00 4449.06 0.00 705.27 0.00
6.3.2 AEP-Surcharge 0.00 1780.92 0.00 145.72 0.00
6.4 VERT LOAD DUE TO EARTH
6.4.1 Due to backfill 3768.96 -21168.08 0.00 0.00 0.00
6.4.2 Due to DL & LL surcharge 163.18 -807.74 0.00 0.00 0.00
6.4.3 Due to Front earthfill 442.80 1677.07 0.00 0.00 0.00
6.5 SEISMIC FORCES
6.5.1 On Superstructure DL 4.00 142.36 154.12 8.00 8.00
6.5.2 On SIDL 4.02 143.14 172.73 8.05 8.05
6.5.3 On Abutment Cap 2.84 103.40 103.40 5.69 5.69
6.5.4 On Breast Wall 15.69 288.63 288.63 31.37 31.37
6.5.5 On Back Counterforts 12.67 178.81 178.81 25.34 25.34
6.5.6 On Front Counterforts 7.89 80.35 80.35 15.79 15.79
6.5.7 On Footing 38.57 69.43 69.43 77.15 77.15
6.5.8 50% LL in Trasverse direc 3.48 0.00 170.24 0.00 6.96
6.6 DYNAMIC INCREMENT OF AEP
6.6.1 Of Backfill 1706.05 180.30
6.6.2 Of Surcharge 352.49 37.25
6.7 WIND FORCE
6.7.1 On super structure 0.00 0.00 172.27 0.00 8.95
6.7.2 On live load 0.00 0.00 243.80 0.00 10.10
6.8 LWR FORCES
0.00 1081.89 0.00 60.83 0.00

S M CONSULTANTS,BHUBANESWAR
ABUTMENT CONSTRUCTION OF NEW B.G. LINE FROM CHHOTA UDAIPUR TO DHAR

8 COMBINATION OF LOADS
CASE I Normal (DL+SIDL+LL)
CASE II a Normal + Wind (DL+SIDL+LL+ WL)
CASE II b Normal + Longitudinal & Vertical Seismic (DL+SIDL+LL+ EL)
CASE II c Normal + Transverse & Vertical Seismic (DL+SIDL+LL+ EL)
CASE III Normal + LWR FORCES (DL+SIDL+LL+ LWR)
(Note: As per Cl 4.4 of BS 114 Ver 2- RSI Case is an SLS check. - Hence the above load case is used for
serviceability/stability checking only)

Loads are to be considered in following combinations:


Ref Cl 11.2 & 11.3 of IRS Concrete Bridge Code
From TABLE 12 of IRS Concrete Bridge Code
Load Limit State Case 1 Case 2 Case 3
ULS 1.25 1.25 1.25
Dead Weight of Concrete
SLS 1 1 1
ULS 2 2 2
SIDL
SLS 1.2 1.2 1.2
Wind with DL + SIDL + other appropriate ULS - 1.25 -
combination 2 loads SLS - 1 -
Earthquake with DL + SIDL + other appropriate ULS - 1.25 -
combination 2 loads SLS - 1 -
ULS 1.7 1.7 1.7
Earth pressure
SLS 1 1 1
ULS 1.75 1.4 1.4
Live Load
SLS 1.1 1 1
ULS - - 1.5
Temperature Effectes
SLS - - 1

9.0 Combination of Loads and Moments at Base of Abutment


9.1 Serviceability Limit State (SLS)
9.1.1 Case - I (Normal Load Case)

Vertical Load (V) = = 2001.802 T


Longitudinal Moment (ML) = = 8732.875 T-m
Transverse Moment (MT) = = 25.990 T-m
Horizontal Load in Longitudinal Direction (HL) = = 905.962 T
Horizontal Load in Transverse Direction (HT) = = 0.000 T

9.1.2 Case - II a (Normal Load Case+ WL)

Vertical Load (V) = = 1661.434 T


Longitudinal Moment (ML) = = 7188.977 T-m
Transverse Moment (MT) = = 405.412 T-m
Horizontal Load in Longitudinal Direction (HL) = = 900.964 T
Horizontal Load in Transverse Direction (HT) = = 19.047 T

S M CONSULTANTS,BHUBANESWAR
ABUTMENT CONSTRUCTION OF NEW B.G. LINE FROM CHHOTA UDAIPUR TO DHAR

9.1.3 Case - II b (Normal Load Case+ Longitudinal Seismic & Vertical Seismic)

Vertical Load (V) = = 2020.880 T


Longitudinal Moment (ML) = = 11343.999 T-m
Transverse Moment (MT) = = 23.627 T-m
Horizontal Load in Longitudinal Direction (HL) = = 1196.962 T
Horizontal Load in Transverse Direction (HT) = = 0.000 T

9.1.4 Case - II c (Normal Load Case+ Transverse Seismic & Vertical Seismic)

Vertical Load (V) = = 2020.880 T


Longitudinal Moment (ML) = = 8570.333 T-m
Transverse Moment (MT) = = 937.799 T-m
Horizontal Load in Longitudinal Direction (HL) = = 900.964 T
Horizontal Load in Transverse Direction (HT) = = 85.409 T

9.1.5 Case - III (Normal Load Case+ LWR FORCES)


Vertical Load (V) = = 1978.175 T
Longitudinal Moment (ML) = = 9542.742 T-m
Transverse Moment (MT) = = 23.63 T-m
Horizontal Load in Longitudinal Direction (HL) = = 961.789 T
Horizontal Load in Transverse Direction (HT) = = 0 T

9.2 Ultimate Limit State (ULS)


9.2.1 Case - I (Normal Load Case)

Vertical Load (V) = = 2969.900 T


Longitudinal Moment (ML) = = 13759.61 T-m
Transverse Moment (MT) = = 41.347 T-m
Horizontal Load in Longitudinal Direction (HL) = = 1534.138 T
Horizontal Load in Transverse Direction (HT) = = 0.000 T

9.2.2 Case - II a (Normal Load Case+ WL)

Vertical Load (V) = = 2887.206 T


Longitudinal Moment (ML) = = 13190.71 T-m
Transverse Moment (MT) = = 510.309 T-m
Horizontal Load in Longitudinal Direction (HL) = = 1516.645 T
Horizontal Load in Transverse Direction (HT) = = 23.808 T

9.2.3 Case - II b (Normal Load Case+ Longitudinal Seismic & Vertical Seismic)

Vertical Load (V) = = 2924.749 T


Longitudinal Moment (ML) = = 14931.10 T-m
Transverse Moment (MT) = = 33.078 T-m
Horizontal Load in Longitudinal Direction (HL) = = 1886.642 T
Horizontal Load in Transverse Direction (HT) = = 0.000 T

9.2.4 Case - II c (Normal Load Case+ Transverse Seismic & Vertical Seismic)

Vertical Load (V) = = 2924.749 T


Longitudinal Moment (ML) = = 13190.71 T-m
Transverse Moment (MT) = = 1309.374 T-m
Horizontal Load in Longitudinal Direction (HL) = = 1276.344 T
Horizontal Load in Transverse Direction (HT) = = 106.761 T

S M CONSULTANTS,BHUBANESWAR
ABUTMENT CONSTRUCTION OF NEW B.G. LINE FROM CHHOTA UDAIPUR TO DHAR

S M CONSULTANTS,BHUBANESWAR
ABUTMENT CONSTRUCTION OF NEW B.G. LINE FROM CHHOTA UDAIPUR TO DHAR

10.0 Combination of Loads and Moments at Base of Footing


10.1 Serviceability Limit State (To Determine Footing capacity)
10.1.1 Case - I (Normal Load Case)

Vertical Load (V) = = 7209.019 T


Longitudinal Moment (ML) = = -13854.27 T-m
Transverse Moment (MT) = = 25.990 T-m
Horizontal Load in Longitudinal Direction (HL) = = 905.962 T
Horizontal Load in Transverse Direction (HT) = = 0.000 T

10.1.2 Case - II a (Normal Load Case+ WL)

Vertical Load (V) = = 6984.837 T


Longitudinal Moment (ML) = = -13942.58 T-m
Transverse Moment (MT) = = 439.70 T-m
Horizontal Load in Longitudinal Direction (HL) = = 900.964 T
Horizontal Load in Transverse Direction (HT) = = 19.047 T

10.1.3 Case - II b (Normal Load Case+ Longitudinal Seismic & Vertical Seismic)

Vertical Load (V) = = 7081.905 T


Longitudinal Moment (ML) = = -10797.575 T-m
Transverse Moment (MT) = = 23.627 T-m
Horizontal Load in Longitudinal Direction (HL) = = 1305.687 T
Horizontal Load in Transverse Direction (HT) = = 0.000 T

10.1.4 Case - II c (Normal Load Case+ Transverse Seismic & Vertical Seismic)

Vertical Load (V) = = 7081.905 T


Longitudinal Moment (ML) = = -13942.576 T-m
Transverse Moment (MT) = = 1321.661 T-m
Horizontal Load in Longitudinal Direction (HL) = = 900.964 T
Horizontal Load in Transverse Direction (HT) = = 242.668 T

S M CONSULTANTS,BHUBANESWAR
ABUTMENT CONSTRUCTION OF NEW B.G. LINE FROM CHHOTA UDAIPUR TO DHAR

10.1.5 Case - III (Normal Load Case+ LWR FORCES)


Vertical Load (V) = = 7185.392 T
Longitudinal Moment (ML) = = -12860.68 T-m
Transverse Moment (MT) = = 23.627 T-m
Horizontal Load in Longitudinal Direction (HL) = = 961.789 T
Horizontal Load in Transverse Direction (HT) = = 0.000 T

10.2 Ultimate Limit State (For Design of Footing)


10.2.1 Case - I (Normal Load Case)

Vertical Load (V) = = 11118.896 T


Longitudinal Moment (ML) = = -23318.885 T-m
Transverse Moment (MT) = = 41.347 T-m
Horizontal Load in Longitudinal Direction (HL) = = 1534.138 T
Horizontal Load in Transverse Direction (HT) = = 0.000 T

10.2.2 Case - II a (Normal Load Case+ WL)

Vertical Load (V) = = 11036.202 T


Longitudinal Moment (ML) = = -23709.441 T-m
Transverse Moment (MT) = = 553.163 T-m
Horizontal Load in Longitudinal Direction (HL) = = 1516.645 T
Horizontal Load in Transverse Direction (HT) = = 23.808 T

10.2.3 Case - II b (Normal Load Case+ Longitudinal Seismic & Vertical Seismic)

Vertical Load (V) = = 11157.536 T


Longitudinal Moment (ML) = = -19778.189 T-m
Transverse Moment (MT) = = 33.078 T-m
Horizontal Load in Longitudinal Direction (HL) = = 2022.549 T
Horizontal Load in Transverse Direction (HT) = = 0.000 T

10.2.4 Case - II c (Normal Load Case+ Transverse Seismic & Vertical Seismic)

Vertical Load (V) = = 11157.536 T


Longitudinal Moment (ML) = = -23709.441 T-m
Transverse Moment (MT) = = 1655.620 T-m
Horizontal Load in Longitudinal Direction (HL) = = 1133.702 T
Horizontal Load in Transverse Direction (HT) = = 242.668 T

S M CONSULTANTS,BHUBANESWAR
ABUTMENT CONSTRUCTION OF NEW B.G. LINE FROM CHHOTA UDAIPUR TO DHAR

14.1 Summary of Forces at Base of Abutment


Serviceability Limit State (SLS)
Case - I Case - II a Case - II b Case - II c Case III
V (T) 2001.80 1661.43 2020.88 2020.88 1978.18
ML (T - m) 8732.87 7188.98 11344.00 8570.33 9542.74
MT (T - m) 25.99 405.41 23.63 937.80 23.63
HL (T) 905.96 900.96 1196.96 900.96 961.79
HT (T) 0.00 19.05 0.00 85.41 0.00

Ultimate Limit State (ULS)


Case - I Case - II a Case - II b Case - II c
V (T) 2969.90 2887.21 2924.75 2924.75
ML (T - m) 13759.61 13190.71 14931.10 13190.71
MT (T - m) 41.35 510.31 33.08 1309.37
HL (T) 1534.14 1516.65 1886.64 1276.34
HT (T) 0.00 23.81 0.00 106.76

14.2 Summary of Forces at Base of Footing


Serviceability Limit State (SLS)
Case - I Case - II a Case - II b Case - II c Case III
V (T) 7209.02 6984.84 7081.90 7081.90 7185.39
ML (T - m) -13854.27 -13942.6 -10797.6 -13942.58 -12860.68
MT (T - m) 25.99 439.70 23.63 1321.66 23.63
HL (T) 905.96 900.96 1305.69 900.96 961.79
HT (T) 0.00 19.05 0.00 242.67 0.00

Ultimate Limit State (ULS)


Case - I Case - II a Case - II b Case - II c
V (T) 11118.90 11036.20 11157.54 11157.54
ML (T - m) -23318.88 -23709 -19778 -23709.44
MT (T - m) 41.35 553.16 33.08 1655.62
HL (T) 1534.14 1516.65 2022.55 1133.70
HT (T) 0.00 23.81 0.00 242.67

S M CONSULTANTS,BHUBANESWAR
ABUTMENT CONSTRUCTION OF NEW B.G. LINE FROM CHHOTA UDAIPUR TO DHAR

15.0 DESIGN OF BACK COUNTERFORTS

a) Design as per Column Analogy


The Abutment section is checked for Ultimate Limit State
Counterfort Section at Base Counterfort Section at Top

1.6 1.6
5.00 0.35

Average width = 2.675 m


Critical Axial Compressive load = 2969.900
In Plane Bending Moment = 14931.095 T - m
Out of Plane Bending Moment = 33.078 T - m

Resultant Moment MR = SQRT (ML2 + MT2) = 14931.1319 T - m


Design Axial Load per counterfort = 2969.9 / 2
= 1484.95013 T
Design Moment per counterfort = 14931.132 / 2
= 7465.566 T - m / m
Material Property
2
Grade of Concrete fck = 35 N/mm
2
Grade of Reinforcement fy = 500 N/mm
Chart 47 of SP 16
Section Property
Width of Section = 2675.00 mm
Length of Section = 1600.00 mm
Clear Cover to any Reinforcement = 75 mm
Diameter of Outer Links = 16 mm
Diameter of Main Vertical R/F Outer Layer = 32 mm
Effective Cover (d') = 75 + 16 + 32 / 2 = 107 mm
d' / D = 107 / 2675 = 0.040

Critical Load Cases

Axial Load Moment Refer Chart 47


Load Case ( Pu ) ( Mu ) Pu / fck bD Mu / fck bD2 from SP-16 p
(T) (T-m) p / fck (%)
I 1484.95 7465.57 0.166 0.186 0.082 2.87

Thus, p = 2.87 %
2
Therefore, Asc = 122836 mm

Let us Provide
In Layer - I 80 Nos. 32 mm diameter bars as main R/F in Outer Layer
In Layer - II 80 Nos. 32 mm diameter bars as main R/F in Outer Layer
Provide 16 @ 210 mm C/C as Lateral Ties.

Check For Reinforcement Percentage


Gross Concrete Area = 4280000 mm2 Minimum R/F Actual R/F Remarks
(mm2) (mm2)

122836 < 128680 OK


2
Total Reinforcement Area = 128679.6 mm
Perimeter (mm) = 8250.00 mm
Spacing of Reinforcement (C/C) = 8250 / 80 = 103.13 mm

Provide 32 mm dia bars all around in2 layers at spacing of 103.13 mm C/C

b) Design as per Cantilever Slab Analogy

The Abutment section is checked for Ultimate Limit State


Charecterestic Compressive Strength of Concrete fck = 35 Mpa
Charecterestic Tensile Strength of Reinforcement fy = 500 Mpa

S M CONSULTANTS,BHUBANESWAR
ABUTMENT CONSTRUCTION OF NEW B.G. LINE FROM CHHOTA UDAIPUR TO DHAR

Counterfort Wall can be treated as a Cantilever Slab where the Ultimate Axial Load is less than 0.1 fck Ac . and shall be
designed in accordance with Cl: 15.4.2.1.2 of IRS:Concrete Bridge Code.
2
Base Section Area of Counterfort Ac = 5 x 1.6 = 8.000 m
Therefore; 0.10 x fck x Ac = ( 0.10 x 35 x 8 ) x 100
= 2800 T
Maximum Ultimate Axial Compressive Load Pmax on each counterfort = 1484.950 T
Therefore; 0.1 x fck x Ac = 2800 > Pmax = 1484.950 T
Maximum Ultimate Longitudinal Moment ML = 14931.10 T - m
Corresponding Ultimate Transverse Moment MT = 33.078 T - m
2
Resultant Moment MR = SQRT (ML + MT2)
= SQRT ( 14931.095^2 + 33.078^2 )
= 14931.1319 T - m
Design Moment per Counterfort = 14931.132 / 2
= 7465.566 T - m
Overall Width B = 1600.00 mm
Overall Depth D = 5000.00 mm
Clear Cover = 50 mm
Diameter of Main Rods (Vertical) = 32 mm

Effective Cover = 50 + 0 + 32 / 2 = 66 mm
Effective Depth, d = 5000 - 66 = 4934 mm
2
Area of Tension Steel Provided Ast = 38300 mm

As per Cl: 15.4.2.2.1 of IRS Concrete Bridge Code;


For Sections without Compression Reinforcement the Ultimate Moment of Resistance may be taken as the lesser of the
1 0.87 fy As z
2 0.15 fck b d2

where; z = ( 1 - 1.1 fy Ast / (fck b d ) ) d


= ( 1 - 1.1 x 0 x 38300 / (103 x 1000 x 4934 ) ) d
= 1.00 d
Limiting to = 0.95 d
= 0.95 x 4934
= 4687.3 mm

Section Capacity as per Equation 1


= 0.87 x 500 x 38300 x 4687.3 x 1.0E-06
= 78092.76 KN - m
= 7809.28 T - m
Section Capacity as per Equation 2
= 0.15 x 35 x 1600 x 4934^2 x 1.0E-06
= 204492.6 KN - m
= 20449.26 T - m
Design Section Capactiy = Minimum of ( 7809.28 , 20449.26 )
= 7809.3 T - m > 7465.566 T - m
OK
As the Design Section Capacity is greater than the Ultimate Moment the Section is OK
[Ref: As per Cl: 15.9.4.1 of IRS Concrete Bridge Code]
Minimum Reinforcement percentage in a wall section = 0.2 % of bd
Ast_min = ( 0.2 / 100 ) x 4934 x 1600
= 15788.8 mm2

Provide T- 32 @ 105 mm c/c IN LAYER I on Earth Face


Area of Steel provided = ( π / 4 )32^2 x 1000 / 105 = 7660.000 mm2
Provide T- 32 @ 105 mm c/c IN LAYER II on Earth Face
Area of Steel provided = ( π / 4 )32^2 x 1000 / 105 = 7660.000 mm2
Provide T- 32 @ 105 mm c/c IN LAYER III on Earth Face
Area of Steel provided = ( π / 4 )32^2 x 1000 / 105 = 7660.000
Provide T- 32 @ 105 mm c/c IN LAYER IV on Earth Face
Area of Steel provided = ( π / 4 )32^2 x 1000 / 105 = 7660.000
Provide T- 32 @ 105 mm c/c IN LAYER V on Earth Face
Area of Steel provided = ( π / 4 )32^2 x 1000 / 105 = 7660.000

Total area of Longituidinal Steel provided, Ast = 7660 + 7660 + 7660 + 7660+7660
2
= 38300 mm
2 2
Therefore, Ast = 38300 mm > 15788.8 mm OK

S M CONSULTANTS,BHUBANESWAR
ABUTMENT CONSTRUCTION OF NEW B.G. LINE FROM CHHOTA UDAIPUR TO DHAR

Minimum secondary reinforcement = 0.12 % of bd


= ( 0.12 / 100 ) x 4934 x 1000
= 5920.8

Reinforcement on outer face


Provide T- 32 @ 105 mm c/c Vertically LAYER 1
2
Therefore, Ast_trans = ( π / 4 )32^2 x 1000 / 105 = 7660 mm / m

Provide T- 0 @ 105 mm c/c Vertically LAYER 2


2
Therefore, Ast_trans = ( π / 4 )0^2 x 1000 / 105 = 0 mm / m
OK

CHECK FOR SHEAR


Maximum Ultimate Longitudinal Force HL = 1886.642 T
Corresponding Ultimate Transverse Force HT = 0.000 T
Resultant Force HR= SQRT (HL2 + HT2)
= SQRT ( 1886.642^2 + 0^2 )
= 1886.642 T
Therefore, Ultimate Shear Force per Counterfort, Vu = 1886.642 x 10 / 2
= 9433.212 KN / m
As per Cl: 15.4.3 of IRS Concrete Bridge Code.
Direct Shear Stress τ = Vu / bd
= ( 9433.21 x 1000 ) / ( 1600 x 4934 )
= 1.195 N/mm2

Maximum Shear Stress = τmax


(τ max = 0.75 sqrt(f ck ) or 4.75 N / mm 2 whichever is less ) % steel For M35
0.15 0.37
0.75 sqrt ( fck ) = 0.75 x 35^0.5 0.25 0.44
= 4.44 N / mm2 0.5 0.56
1 0.7
Therefore; τmax = Minimum of ( 4.44 , 4.75 ) 2 0.89
= 4.44 N /mm2 > 1.195 N / mm2
OK
As per Table: 15 of IRS Concrete Bridge Code.
100 As / bd = 100 x ( 38300 ) / ( 1600 x 4934 )
= 0.49 %
2
Ultimate Shear Stress in Concrete τc = 0.55 N/mm
(Read from Table: 15 of IRS Concrete Bridge Code.)

As per Table : 16 of IRS Concrete Bridge Code.


Depth Factor s = ( 500 / d )1/4 Subject to Minimum 0.70
= ( 500 / 4934 )^0.25
= 0.564
Therefore; Depth Factor s = 0.700

As per Cl: 15.5.4.1.1 s τc = 0.7 x 0.55


= 0.387 N/mm2

As per Table: 14 of IRS : Concrete Bridge Code.


Area of Lateral Shear Reinforcement to be provided is as follows:
For τ <= s τc Asv >= 0.4 b sv / 0.87 fyv
For τ > s τc Asv >= b sv ( τ + 0.4 – sτc ) / 0.87 fyv
Remark : f yv should not be more than 415 N/mm 2
From the above Values we find that τ > s τc
Diameter of Shear Reinforcement = 16 mm
Spacing of Shear Reinforcement in Vertical Direction = 210 mm
Spacing of Shear Reinforcement in Horizontal Direction = 210 mm
Therefore, Asv_provided = ( π /4 ) x 16^2 x 5
= 957 mm2 / m

Asv_required = 1600 x 210( 1.195 + 0.4 - 0.387)/(0.87*I1426)


= 933.076 mm2 / m
Since, Asv_provided is > Asv_required The Section is OK

S M CONSULTANTS,BHUBANESWAR
BALLAST WALL CONSTRUCTION OF NEW B.G. LINE FROM CHHOTA UDAIPUR TO DHAR

DESIGN OF ABUTMENT BREAST WALL


The Breast Wall is designed as a continuous slab fixed to the counterforts
Design Parameters

Height from Top of Foundation to Formation = 18.925 m


Projection of wall above formation level = 0.000 m
Height of Earth retention H = 18.925 m
Angle of Internal Friction φ = 35.0 degree
Angle of Wall Friction δ = 11.7 degree
Active EP Coefficient Ka = 0.251
Density of Backfill material γ = 2.0 T / m3
Thickness of wall at top = 1.350 m
Thickness of wall at bottom = 1.350 m

Load Calculation
2.1 Earth Pressure Coefficient

φ = 35.0 degrees = 0.611 radians


δ = 11.67 degrees = 0.204 radians
α = 0.00 degrees = 0.000 radians
i = 0 degrees = 0.000 radians
cos2 ( φ - α)
Ka =
cos2 α cos ( δ + α) 1+ sin ( φ + δ) sin(φ - i) 2
cos ( δ + α) cos (α-i)
= 0.251

1 Active Earth Pressure Due to Backfill


Height of Earth retention H = 18.925 m
Pressure at top of Foundation 0.251 x 2 x 18.925 = 9.495 T/m2 /m
Outer Span = 1.925 m
Inner Span = 0.800 m
Outer Span Shear = 18.278 T
Outer Span negative Moment = 17.592 T-m
Inner Span positive moment = 0.253 T-m
Inner Span negative moment = 0.506 T-m

Considering ULS Load Factor 1.7


Factored Horizontal Force 18.277875 x 1.7 = 31.072 T /m
Factored Moment 17.5924546875 x 1.7 = 29.907 T-m/m

2 Active Earth Pressure Due to Surcharge


Note : Please Refer CL. 5.8.2 Of IRS : Substructure & Foundation Code.
Dead Load Surcharge for each track V = 6.20 T/m
Live Load Surchage for each track S = 13.70 T/m
Surcharge Width at Formation Level B = 3.00 m
Length of Abutment L = 7.85 m
Height of Earth Retention H = 18.925 m

L-B = 7.85 - 3 = 4.850 m

THEREFORE, H < ( L - B )
(TOP OF BALLAST WALL) 1.664

18.925

(BOTTOM OF BALLAST WALL)


0.23

S M CONSULTANTS,BHUBANESWAR
BALLAST WALL CONSTRUCTION OF NEW B.G. LINE FROM CHHOTA UDAIPUR TO DHAR

Pressure at Top = [ (S + V ) / B ] Ka x No of tracks


= [ ( 13.7 + 6.2 ) / 3 ] x 0.251 x 1
= 1.66 T / m2
Pressure at h i.e. 18.925 m below from Top
= [ (S + V ) / (B + h) ] Ka x No of tracks
= [ ( 13.7 + 6.2 ) / (3 + 18.93 ) ] x 0.251 x 1
= 0.23 T / m2
Average Pressure = 0.95 T / m2
at Base of Wall
Total Shear = 1.821 T
Total Moment = 1.752 T - m

Considering ULS Load Factor 1.7


Factored Horizontal Force 1.821 x 1.7 = 3.095 T /m
Factored Moment 1.752 x 1.7 = 2.979 T-m/m

Forces and Moments


Total Design Horizontal Force on wall = 34.168 T / m
Total Design Moment about base of wall = 32.886 T - m / m

Reinforcement Calculation

Charecterestic Compressive Strength of Concrete fck = 35 Mpa


Charecterestic Tensile Strength of Reinforcement fy = 500 Mpa
Overall Depth at base D = 1350 mm
Clear Cover = 75 mm
Diameter of Main Rods (Vertical) = 20 mm
Diameter of Distribution Rods (Horizontal) = 16 mm
Effective Cover = 75 + 20 / 2 = 85 mm
Effective Depth, d = 1350 - 85 = 1265 mm
Area of Tension Steel Provided on Each Face (per m width), Ast
= 2992 mm2 / m

S M CONSULTANTS,BHUBANESWAR
BALLAST WALL CONSTRUCTION OF NEW B.G. LINE FROM CHHOTA UDAIPUR TO DHAR

As per Cl: 15.4.2.2.1 of IRS Concrete Bridge Code;


For Sections without Compression Reinforcement the Ultimate Moment of Resistance may be taken as the
1 0.87 fy As z
2 0.15 fck b d2

where z = ( 1 - 1.1 fy Ast / (fck b d ) ) d


= ( 1 - 1.1 x 500 x 2992 / (35 x 1000 x 1265 ) ) d
= 0.96 d
Limiting to = 0.95 d
= 0.95 x 1265
= 1201.75 mm

Section Capacity as per Equation 1


= 0.87 x 500 x 2992 x 1201.75 x 1.0E-06
= 1564.1017 KN - m
= 156.410 T - m
Section Capacity as per Equation 2
= 0.15 x 35 x 1000 x 1265^2 x 1.0E-06
= 8401.1813 KN - m
= 840.118 T - m
Design Section Capactiy = Minimum of ( 156.41 , 840.12 )
= 156.410 T - m > 32.886 T - m
OK
As the Design Section Capacity is greater than the Ultimate Moment the Section is OK
[Ref: As per Cl: 15.9.4.2 of IRS Concrete Bridge Code]
Minimum Reinforcement percentage in a wall section
Ast_min = 0.2 % of bd
= ( 0.2 / 100 ) x 1265 x 1000
= 2530 mm2 / m
Provide T- 20 @ 105 mm c/c
IN LAYER I on Earth Face
Area of Steel provided = ( π / 4 )20^2 x 1000 / 105 = 2992.00
Provide T- 0 @ 105 mm c/c
IN LAYER II on Earth Face
Area of Steel provided 25 ( π / 4 )0^2 x 1000 / 105 = 0.000

Total area of Longituidinal Steel provided, Ast = 2992 + 0


= 2992 mm2 / m
2 2
Therefore, Ast = 2992 mm / m > 2530 mm / m OK

S M CONSULTANTS,BHUBANESWAR
BALLAST WALL CONSTRUCTION OF NEW B.G. LINE FROM CHHOTA UDAIPUR TO DHAR

CHECK FOR SHEAR


Therefore, Ultimate Shear Force per unit Width, Vu = 34.168 T/m
= 335.184 KN / m
As per Cl: 15.4.3 of IRS Concrete Bridge Code.
Direct Shear Stress τ = Vu / bd
= ( 335.18 x 1000 ) / ( 1000 x 1265 )
= 0.265 N/mm2
Maximum Shear Stress = τmax
(τ max = 0.75 sqrt(f ck ) or 4.75 N / mm 2 whichever is less )

0.75 sqrt ( fck ) = 0.75 x 35^0.5


= 4.44 N / mm2

Thereτmax = Minimum of ( 4.44 , 4.75 )


= 4.44 N /mm2 > 0.265 N/mm2
OK
As per Table: 15 of IRS Concrete Bridge Code. % steel For M35
100 As / bd = 100 x ( 2992 ) / ( 1000 x 1265 ) 0.15 0.37
= 0.24 % 0.25 0.44
2
Ultimate Shear Stress in Con τc = 0.555 N/mm 0.5 0.56
(Read from Table: 15 of IRS Concrete Bridge Code.) 1 0.7
2 0.89
As per Table : 16 of IRS Concrete Bridge Code.
Depth Factor s = ( 500 / d )1/4 Subject to Minimum 0.70
= ( 500 / 1265 )^0.25
= 0.793
Therefore; Depth Factor s = 0.793

As per Cl: 15.5.4.1.1 s τc = 0.793 x 0.55


= 0.440 N/mm2

As per Table: 14 of IRS : Concrete Bridge Code.


Area of Lateral Shear Reinforcement to be provided is as follows:
For τ <= s τc Asv >= 0.4 b sv / 0.87 fyv
For τ > s τc Asv >= b sv ( τ + 0.4 – sτc ) / 0.87 fyv
Remark : f yv should not be more than 415 N/mm 2
From the above Values we find that τ < s τc

Diameter of Shear Reinforcement = 10 mm


Spacing of Shear Reinforcement in Vertical Direction = 210 mm
Spacing of Shear Reinforcement in Horizontal Direction = 210 mm
Therefore, Asv_provided = ( π /4 ) x 10^2 x 5
= 374 mm2 / m

Asv_required = 0.40 x 1000 x 210 / ( 0.87 x 415 )


= 232.655 mm2 / m
Since, Asv_provided is > Asv_required The Section is OK

S M CONSULTANTS,BHUBANESWAR
FOOTING CONSTRUCTION OF NEW B.G. LINE FROM CHHOTA UDAIPUR TO DHAR

A RCC DESIGN OF FOOTING IN BETWEEN COUNTERFORTS


Note: SLS combinations are used to check foundation pressure and stability against Overturning and
Sliding. ULS combinationsa are used to design foundation reinforcement
1.0 Design Data
Bearing Capacity = 385 t/m2
Length of Footing (Trans Direction) = 10.00 m
Width of Footing (Longitudinal Direction) = 17.75 m
Depth of Footing = 1.8 m
Weight of Footing = 964.37 T
Area of Footing = 177.5 m2
Section Modulus
Longitudinal Direction = 525.104 m3
Transverse Direction = 295.833 m3
Summary of Loads at Bottom of Footing
SLS Case - I Case - II a Case - II b Case - II c Case - III
V (t) 7209.02 6984.84 7081.90 7081.90 7185.39
ML (t) -13854.27 -13942.58 -10797.57 -13942.58 -12860.68
MT (t) 25.99 439.70 23.63 1321.66 23.63
HL (t) 905.96 900.96 1305.69 900.96 961.79
HT (t) 0.00 19.05 0.00 242.67 0.00

ULS Case - I Case - II a Case - II b Case - II c


V (t) 11118.90 11036.20 11157.54 11157.54
ML (t) -23318.88 -23709.44 -19778.19 -23709.44
MT (t) 41.35 553.16 33.08 1655.62
HL (t) 1534.14 1516.65 2022.55 1133.70
HT (t) 0.00 23.81 0.00 242.67

2.0 Bearing Pressure

A C

10.00

B D
17.75

Bearing
Pressure (in Case - I Case - II a Case - II b Case - II c Case - III
T/m2) at
A 14.318 14.285 19.415 17.814 16.069
B 14.142 11.313 19.255 8.878 15.910
C 67.086 67.390 60.541 70.918 65.053
D 66.910 64.417 60.381 61.982 64.893
SBC Check safe safe safe safe safe

S M CONSULTANTS,BHUBANESWAR
FOOTING CONSTRUCTION OF NEW B.G. LINE FROM CHHOTA UDAIPUR TO DHAR

2.1 List of Forces causing Resisting Moments at toe of footing

Moment
about toe (T-
Sl Force Magnitude (T) Lever Arm(m) m) ML
1 Superstructure DL 100.044 8.525 852.871
2 SIDL 100.595 8.525 857.572
3 DL of dirt wall 36.785 9.250 340.262
4 DL of abutment Cap 33.363 8.875 296.092
5 DL of pedestals 1.111 8.525 9.472
6 DL of abutment shaft 392.134 8.875 3480.189
7 DL of Splayed wing wall 316.741 12.283 3890.640
9 DL of footing(at HFL) 578.62 8.875 5135.284
10 DL of backfill soil 3768.96 13.650 51446.323
11 DL + LL Surcharge 163.18 13.650 2227.407
12 DL of Front fill 442.8 4.100 1815.480

2.2 List of Forces causing Overturning Moments at toe of footing

Sl Force (ML)Moment about toe(T-m)


1 Tractive force 888.994
2 AEP due to backfill 4449.058
3 AEP due to surcharge 1780.918
4 WL on Superstructure 172.273
5 WL on Live Load 243.795
6 EL on superstructure 142.358
7 EL due to SIDL 143.143
8 EL on Cap 103.397
9 EL on Abutment Shaft 288.626
10 EL on splayed wing wall 178.805
11 EL on Footing 69.435
12 LWR Forces 1081.894

3 Factor of Safety
3.1 Against Overturning Case - I Case - II a Case - II b Case - II c Case - III
Overturning Moment 7118.97 7535.04 8044.73 8044.73 8200.86
Resisting Moment 72326.28 72326.28 72326.28 72326.28 72326.3
Factor of Safety 10.16 9.60 8.99 8.99 8.82
Comments OK OK OK OK OK

3.2 Against Sliding Co - efficient of Friction 0.55


Sliding Force 905.962 901.166 1305.687 933.072 961.789
Resisting Force 3964.960 3841.661 3895.047 3895.047 3951.966
Factor of Safety 4.377 4.263 2.983 2.983 4.109
Comments OK OK OK OK OK

S M CONSULTANTS,BHUBANESWAR
FOOTING CONSTRUCTION OF NEW B.G. LINE FROM CHHOTA UDAIPUR TO DHAR

4.0 Design Soil Pressure


Soil Pressure Acting Upward (For Design Bending Moment & Shear Force)
Case - I Case - II a Case - II b Case - II c
Pressure at Toe (t/m2) 14.32 14.29 19.42 17.81
Pressure at Heel (t/m2) 66.91 64.42 60.38 61.98
At Critical Section for flexure (span side ) 38.614 37.445 38.340 38.218
At Critical Section for Shear (span side) 38.614 37.445 38.340 38.218
At Critical Section for flexure (earth side) 42.614 41.258 41.456 41.578
At Critical Section for Shear (earth side) 42.614 41.258 41.456 41.578

Point for Max Moment & Shear (span side) 8.20 m


Effective Span for Shear (span side) 1.925 m
Point for Bending Moment (earth side) 9.55 m
Effective Span for Max moment & shear (earth side) 1.925 m

5.0 Design Bending Moment and Shear Force at Critical Section


5.1 Span Side
Case - I Case - II a Case - II b Case - II c
U/WBending Moment due to Soil Pressure 71.545 69.378 71.037 70.812
D/W moment due to DL of Footing at HFL 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.3
D/W moment due to Front Earth fill 10.005 10.005 10.005 10.005
Net Bending Moment U/W (t-m/m) 53.202 51.035 52.694 52.469
U/W Shear Force due to soil pressure (t/m) 74.332 72.081 73.805 73.570
D/W Relieving Effect due to DL of Footing at 8.663 8.663 8.663 8.663
D/W Relieving Effect due to Front Earth fill 10.395 10.395 10.395 10.395
Net Shear Force U/W (t/m) 55.275 53.024 54.747 54.513

5.2 Earth Side


Case - I Case - II a Case - II b Case - II c
U/W Bending Moment due to Soil Pressure 78.956 76.443 76.810 77.036
D/W Relieving Effect due to DL of Footing at 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.3
D/W Relieving Effect due to Earth fill 70.129 70.129 70.129 70.129
D/WRelieving Effect due to surcharge 15.706 15.706 15.706 15.706
D/W Net Bending Moment (t-m/m) -15.217 -17.730 -17.363 -17.137
U/W Shear Force due to soil pressure (t/m) 82.032 79.421 79.803 80.037
D/W Relieving Effect due to DL of Footing at 8.663 8.663 8.663 8.663
D/W Relieving Effect due to Earth fill 88.479 88.479 88.479 88.479
D/W Relieving Effect due to surcharge 3.831 3.831 3.831 3.831
D/W Net Shear Force (t/m) -18.940 -21.551 -21.169 -20.935

5.3 Critical Design Values Case - I Case - II a Case - II b Case - II c


Bending Moment for Bottom Reinforcem 53.202 51.035 52.694 52.469
Bending Moment for Top Reinforcement 15.217 17.730 17.363 17.137
Shear Force (t/m) 55.275 53.024 54.747 54.513

S M CONSULTANTS,BHUBANESWAR
FOOTING CONSTRUCTION OF NEW B.G. LINE FROM CHHOTA UDAIPUR TO DHAR

6.0 Design of Footing


Diameter of main Bars at Bottom 25 mm
Diameter of main Bars at Top 25 mm
No. of Layers of Main Reinforcement at Bottom 2
Diameter of Spacer Bars 20 mm
Diameter of Secondary Bars 20 mm
Diameter of Shear Reinforcement 12 mm
Clear Cover 75 mm
Grade of Concrete M 35
Grade of Steel 500 N/mm2
Effective Depth (Bottom) 1690 mm
Effective Depth (Top) 1712.5 mm
Width 1000 mm
Moment Resisting Capacity of Concrete section 1499.4525 t-m/m

7 DESIGN OF FOOTING AT TOP : HEEL SLAB


Footing is checked for Ultimate Limit State
Charecterestic Compressive Strength of Concrete
fck = 35 Mpa
Charecterestic Tensile Strength of Reinforcement
fy = 500 Mpa
Maximum Ultimate Longitudinal Moment per mML = 94.173 T - m/m

Overall Depth D = 1800 mm


Clear Cover = 75 mm
Diameter of Main Rods = 25 mm
Diameter of Distribution Rods = 20 mm
Effective Cover = 75 + 20 + 25 / 2 = 107.5 mm
Effective Depth, d = 1800 - 107.5 = 1692.5 mm
2
Area of Tension Steel Provided on Each Face (per m width), = 4675 mm / m
As per Cl: 15.4.2.2.1 of IRS Concrete Bridge Code;
For Sections without Compression Reinforcement the Ultimate Moment of Resistance may be
taken as the lesser of the values obtained from the following equations.
1 0.87 fy As z
2 0.15 fck b d2
where; z = ( 1 - 1.1 fy Ast / (fck b d ) ) d
= ( 1 - 1.1 x 500 x 4675 / (0 x 1000 x 1692.5 ) ) d
= 0.96 d
Limiting to = 0.95 d
= 0.95 x 1692.5
= 1607.875 mm
Section Capacity as per Equation 1
= 0.87 x 500 x 4675 x 1607.88 x 1.0E-06
= 3269.815 KN - m
= 326.981 T - m
Section Capacity as per Equation 2
= 0.15 x 0 x 1000 x 1692.5^2 x 1.0E-06
= 15038.92031 KN - m
= 1503.892 T - m
Design Section Capactiy
= Minimum of ( 326.98 , 1503.89 )
= 326.981 T - m > 94.173 T - m
OK
As the Design Section Capacity is greater than the Ultimate Moment
the Section is OK

S M CONSULTANTS,BHUBANESWAR
FOOTING CONSTRUCTION OF NEW B.G. LINE FROM CHHOTA UDAIPUR TO DHAR

[Ref: As per Cl: 15.9.4.2 of IRS Concrete Bridge Code]


Minimum Reinforcement percentage in a wall section
= 0.2 % of bd
Ast_min = ( 0.2 / 100 ) x 1692.5 x 1000
= 3385 mm2 / m

Provide T- 25 @ 105 mm c/c


Area of Steel provided = ( π / 4 )25^2 x 1000 / 105 = 4675.000 mm2
Provide T- 0 @ 105 mm c/c
Area of Steel provided = ( π / 4 )0^2 x 1000 / 105 = 0.000 mm2

Total area of Longituidinal Steel provided, Ast = 4675 + 0


2
= 4675 mm / m
2 2
Therefore, Ast = 4675 mm / m > 3385 mm / m OK

Secondary Reinforcement
Minimum secondary reinforcem = 0.12 % of b d
= ( 0.12 / 100 ) x 1692.5 x 1000
= 2031
Provide T- 20 @ 105 mm c/c as Transverse R/F
Therefore, Ast_trans
= ( π / 4 )20^2 x 1000 / 105 = 2992 mm2 / m
Therefore, Ast_trans 0
2
= 2992 mm / m > 2031 mm2 / m
OK

8 DESIGN OF Footing AT BOTTOM : TOE SLAB


Footing is checked for Ultimate Limit State
Charecterestic Compressive Strength of Concrete
fck = 35 Mpa
Charecterestic Tensile Strength of Reinforcement
fy = 500 Mpa

Maximum Ultimate Longitudinal Moment per meter width


ML = 52.694 T - m/m
Overall Depth D = 1800 mm
Clear Cover = 75 mm
Diameter of Main Rods = 25 mm
Diameter of Distribution Rods = 20 mm
Effective Cover = 75 + 20 + 25 / 2 = 107.5 mm
Effective Depth, d = 1800 - 107.5 = 1692.5 mm
Area of Tension Steel Provided on Each Face (per m width), Ast
= 4675 mm2 / m

As per Cl: 15.4.2.2.1 of IRS Concrete Bridge Code;


For Sections without Compression Reinforcement the Ultimate Moment of Resistance may be
taken as the lesser of the values obtained from the following equations.

1 0.87 fy As z
2 0.15 fck b d2

where; z = ( 1 - 1.1 fy Ast / (fck b d ) ) d


= ( 1 - 1.1 x 500 x 4675 / (35 x 1000 x 1692.5 ) ) d
= 0.96 d
Limiting to = 0.95 d
= 0.95 x 1692.5
= 1607.875 mm

S M CONSULTANTS,BHUBANESWAR
FOOTING CONSTRUCTION OF NEW B.G. LINE FROM CHHOTA UDAIPUR TO DHAR

Section Capacity as per Equation 1


= 0.87 x 500 x 4675 x 1607.88 x 1.0E-06
= 3269.814797 KN - m
= 326.981 T - m
Section Capacity as per Equation 2
= 0.15 x 35 x 1000 x 1692.5^2 x 1.0E-06
= 15038.92031 KN - m
= 1503.892 T - m
Design Section Capactiy
= Minimum of ( 326.98 , 1503.89 )
= 326.981 T - m > 52.694 T - m
OK
As the Design Section Capacity is greater than the Ultimate Moment the Section is OK
[Ref: As per Cl: 15.9.4.2 of IRS Concrete Bridge Code]
Minimum Reinforcement percentage in a wall section
= 0.2 % of bd
Ast_min = ( 0.2 / 100 ) x 1692.5 x 1000
= 3385 mm2 / m

Provide T- 25 @ 105 mm c/c


Area of Steel = ( π / 4 )25^2 x 1000 / 105 = 4675.000 mm
2

Provide T- 0 @ 105 mm c/c


Area of Steel = ( π / 4 )0^2 x 1000 / 105 = 0.000 mm2
Provide T- 0 @ 105 mm c/c
Area of Steel = ( π / 4 )0^2 x 1000 / 105 = 0.000 mm2
Provide T- 0 @ 105 mm c/c
Area of Steel = ( π / 4 )0^2 x 1000 / 105 = 0.000 mm2
Total area of Longituidinal Steel provided, Ast = 4675
2
= 4675 mm / m
2 2
So, Ast = 4675 mm / m > 3385 mm / m OK

Secondary Reinforcement
Minimum secondary reinforcement
= 0.12 % of b d
= ( 0.12 / 100 ) x 1692.5 x 1000
= 2031
Prov T- 20 @ 105 mm c/c as Transverse R/F
Therefore, Ast_trans
= ( π / 4 )20^2 x 1000 / 105 = 2992 mm2 / m
Therefore, Ast_trans
= 2992 mm2 / m > 2031 mm2 / m
OK

Therefore, Ultimate Shear Force per unit Width, Vu


= 1009.719 KN / m
As per Cl: 15.4.3 of IRS Concrete Bridge Code.
Direct Shear Stress = Vu / bd
= ( 1009.72 x 1000 ) / ( 1000 x 1692.5 )
= 0.597 N/mm2

Maximum Shear Stress = τmax % steel For M35


0.15 0.37
( τ max = 0.75 sqrt(f ck ) or 4.75 N / mm 2 whichever is less ) 0.25 0.44
0.75 sqrt ( fck ) = 0.75 x 35^0.5 0.5 0.56
= 4.44 N / mm2 1 0.7
2 0.89
Therefore; τmax = Minimum of ( 4.44 , 4.75 )
= 4.44 N /mm2 > 0.597 N/mm2
OK

S M CONSULTANTS,BHUBANESWAR
FOOTING CONSTRUCTION OF NEW B.G. LINE FROM CHHOTA UDAIPUR TO DHAR

As per Table: 15 of IRS Concrete Bridge Code.


100 As / bd = 100 x ( 4675 ) / ( 1000 x 1692.5 )
= 0.28 %
2
Ultimate Shear Stress in Concr τc = 0.453 N/mm
(Read from Table: 15 of IRS Concrete Bridge Code.)

As per Table : 16 of IRS Concrete Bridge Code.


Depth Factor s = ( 500 / d )1/4 Subject to Minimum 0.70
= ( 500 / 1692.5 )^0.25
= 0.737
Therefore; Depth Fa s = 0.737

As per Cl: 15.5.4.1. s τc = 0.737 x 0.45


= 0.334 N/mm2

As per Table: 14 of IRS : Concrete Bridge Code.


Area of Lateral Shear Reinforcement to be provided is as follows:
For τ <= s τc Asv >= 0.4 b sv / 0.87 fyv
For τ > s τc Asv >= b sv ( τ + 0.4 – sτc ) / 0.87 fyv
Remark : f yv should not be more than 415 N/mm 2
From the above Values we find τ > s τc

Diameter of Shear Reinforcement = 12 mm


Spacing of Shear Reinforcement in LL Direction = 210 mm
Spacing of Shear Reinforcement in Transverse Direction = 210 mm
Therefore, Asv_provide = ( π /4 ) x 12^2 x 4.76
= 539 mm2 / m

Asv_required = 1000 x 210( 0.597 + 0.4 - 0.334)/(0.87*H393)


= 320.069 mm2 / m
Since, Asv_provided is > Asv_required The Section is OK

S M CONSULTANTS,BHUBANESWAR
FOOTING CONSTRUCTION OF NEW B.G. LINE FROM CHHOTA UDAIPUR TO DHAR

B RCC DESIGN OF FOOTING IN BEYOND COUNTERFORTS

1.7

0.6
1

Back Counterfort

Front Counterfort

18.925

9.867
GL
14.55
A 2.7 1.35 B
3.200 5 5 3.2
1.8 1.8

8.2 1.35 8.2


17.75
Cantilever Beyond Counterfort Toe Side = 3.200 m
Cantilever Beyond Counterfort Heel Side = 3.200 m

Case - I Case - II a Case - II b Case - II c


2
Pressure at Toe T/m 0 14.32 14.29 19.42 17.81
Pressure at Heel T/m2 17.75 66.91 64.42 60.38 61.98
Pressure at point A 23.80 23.32 26.80 25.78
Pressure at point A B 57.43 55.38 53.00 54.02
Toe Slab
Force about A T = 60.99 60.17 73.95 69.74
Relieving Effect of Earth = -21.60 -21.60 -21.60 -21.60
Relieving Effect of Self wt = -10.80 -10.80 -10.80 -10.80
LA from A m = 1.467 1.4718 1.5148 1.5026
Moment about A T-m/m = 41.95 40.88 62.93 56.11
Heel Slab
Force about B T = 198.94 191.67 181.40 185.60
Relieving Effect of Earth = -151.40 -151.40 -151.40 -151.40
Relieving Effect of Self wt = -10.80 -10.80 -10.80 -10.80
LA from B m = 1.641 1.640 1.635 1.637
Moment about B T-m/m = 60.28 48.34 31.39 38.30

Design Constants

Grade of Concrete = M 35
Grade of steel = Fe 500
Clear Cover = 50 mm

R fy
fck 415 500
30 4.14 3.99
35 4.83 4.65

2
R = 4.65 N/mm
474.006116 T/m
2
=

S M CONSULTANTS,BHUBANESWAR
FOOTING CONSTRUCTION OF NEW B.G. LINE FROM CHHOTA UDAIPUR TO DHAR

BM Reinforcement Calculation

Eff. Depth Eff depth Ast Ast


Location Moment Dia Spacing
Required Provided Required Provided
Toe Slab Cantileve 41.949 0.297 1.738 3475.00 4674.99 25 105
0.00 0 190
Heel Slab Cantileve 60.282 0.357 1.738 3475.00 4674.99 25 105
0.00 0 190

C RCC DESIGN OF FRONT COUNTERFORTS

Front Counterfort Projection = 5 m


C/C Spacing Between Counterforts = 2.4 m
Case - I Case - II a Case - II b Case - II c
Pressure at Breast Wall Face 38.61 37.44 38.34 38.22
Pressure at Point A 23.80 23.32 26.80 25.78
Average Pressure between A & Wall 31.21 30.38 32.57 32.00
Total Moment from Breast Wall Face 1872.41356 1823.0413 1954.2229 1919.845

Moment on each Counterfort 936.206781 911.52065 977.11144 959.9227

Eff. Depth Eff depth Ast Ast


Location Moment Dia Spacing
Required Provided Required Provided
Bottom Steel 977.111 1.436 4.902 9804.83 5167.09 25 95
3306.94 20 95
3306.94 20 95
11780.97

S M CONSULTANTS,BHUBANESWAR
BALLAST WALL CONSTRUCTION OF NEW B.G. LINE FROM CHHOTA UDAIPUR TO DHAR

DESIGN OF BALLAST WALL

Design Parameters

Height from Bed Block to Formation = 3.124 m


Projection of wall above formation level = 0.000 m
Height of Earth retention H = 3.124 m
Angle of Internal Friction φ = 35.0 degree
Angle of Wall Friction δ = 11.7 degree
Active EP Coefficient Ka = 0.251
Density of Backfill material γ = 2.0 T / m3
Thickness of dirtwall at top = 0.600 m
Thickness of dirtwall at bottom = 0.600 m

Load Calculation
2.1 Earth Pressure Coefficient

φ = 35.0 degrees = 0.611 radians


δ = 11.67 degrees = 0.204 radians
α = 0.00 degrees = 0.000 radians
i = 0 degrees = 0.000 radians
cos2 ( φ - α)
Ka =
cos2 α cos ( δ + α) 1+ sin ( φ + δ) sin(φ - i) 2
cos ( δ + α) cos (α-i)
= 0.251

1 Active Earth Pressure Due to Backfill


Height of Earth retention H = 3.124 m
Pressure at top of Bed Block 0.251 x 2 x 3.124 = 1.567 T/m2 /m
Horizontal Force due to Backfill 0.5 x 1.567 x 3.124 = 2.448 T /m
Point of application of force due to Backfill 3.124 / 3 = 1.041 m
Moment due to above Force 2.448 x 1.041 = 2.548 T-m/m

Considering ULS Load Factor 1.7


Factored Horizontal Force 2.448 x 1.7 = 4.162 T /m
Factored Moment 2.548 x 1.7 = 4.332 T-m/m

2 Active Earth Pressure Due to Surcharge


Note : Please Refer CL. 5.8.2 Of IRS : Substructure & Foundation Code.
Dead Load Surcharge for each track V = 6.20 T/m
Live Load Surchage for each track S = 13.70 T/m
Surcharge Width at Formation Level B = 3.00 m
Length of Abutment L = 7.85 m
Height of Earth Retention H = 3.124 m

L-B = 7.85 - 3 = 4.850 m

THEREFORE, H < ( L - B )
(TOP OF BALLAST WALL) 1.664

3.124

(BOTTOM OF BALLAST WALL)


0.82

S M CONSULTANTS,BHUBANESWAR
BALLAST WALL CONSTRUCTION OF NEW B.G. LINE FROM CHHOTA UDAIPUR TO DHAR

Pressure at Top = [ (S + V ) / B ] Ka x No of tracks


= [ ( 13.7 + 6.2 ) / 3 ] x 0.251 x 1
= 1.66 T / m2
Pressure at h i.e. 3.124 m below from Top
= [ (S + V ) / (B + h) ] Ka x No of tracks
= [ ( 13.7 + 6.2 ) / (3 + 3.12 ) ] x 0.251 x 1
= 0.82 T / m2

P = 0.50 x (1.664 + 0.815 ) x 3.124


= 3.872 T / m
CG = ( 3.124 / 3 ) x ( 2 x 1.664 + 0.815 ) / ( 1.664 + 0.815 )
= 1.740 m

at Base of Ballast Wall


Total Horizontal Force at Base of Ballast Wall = 3.872 T / m
Moment about Base of Ballast Wall
= 3.872 x 1.74 = 6.739 T - m

Considering ULS Load Factor 1.7


Factored Horizontal Force 3.872 x 1.7 = 6.583 T /m
Factored Moment 6.739 x 1.7 = 11.456 T-m/m

3 Longitudinal force due to Tractive Effort

Longitudinal Force at the top of ballast wall for single track = 49.980 T
Width of uniform distribution (including ballast) = 3.700 m
Maximum Braking force per meter 49.98 / 3.7 = 13.508 T/m
Total height of wall = 3.124 m
Moment about Base of Ballast Wall
= 3.124 x 13.508 = 42.199 T - m / m

Considering ULS Load Factor 1.75


Factored Horizontal Force 13.508 x 1.75 = 23.639 T /m
Factored Moment 42.199 x 1.75 = 73.849 T-m/m

Forces and Moments


Total Design Horizontal Force on wall = 34.384 T / m
Total Design Moment about base of wall = 89.637 T - m / m

Reinforcement Calculation

Charecterestic Compressive Strength of Concrete fck = 35 Mpa


Charecterestic Tensile Strength of Reinforcement fy = 500 Mpa
Overall Depth at base D = 600 mm
Clear Cover = 50 mm
Diameter of Main Rods (Vertical) = 25 mm
Diameter of Distribution Rods (Horizontal) = 16 mm
Effective Cover = 50 + 25 / 2 = 62.5 mm
Effective Depth, d = 600 - 62.5 = 537.5 mm
Area of Tension Steel Provided on Each Face (per m width), Ast
= 4675 mm2 / m

S M CONSULTANTS,BHUBANESWAR
BALLAST WALL CONSTRUCTION OF NEW B.G. LINE FROM CHHOTA UDAIPUR TO DHAR

As per Cl: 15.4.2.2.1 of IRS Concrete Bridge Code;


For Sections without Compression Reinforcement the Ultimate Moment of Resistance may be taken as the
1 0.87 fy As z
2 0.15 fck b d2

where z = ( 1 - 1.1 fy Ast / (fck b d ) ) d


= ( 1 - 1.1 x 500 x 4675 / (35 x 1000 x 537.5 ) ) d
= 0.86 d
Limiting to = 0.86 d
= 0.86 x 537.5
= 464.03571 mm

Section Capacity as per Equation 1


= 0.87 x 500 x 4675 x 464.04 x 1.0E-06
= 943.67463 KN - m
= 94.367 T - m
Section Capacity as per Equation 2
= 0.15 x 35 x 1000 x 537.5^2 x 1.0E-06
= 1516.7578 KN - m
= 151.676 T - m
Design Section Capactiy = Minimum of ( 94.37 , 151.68 )
= 94.367 T - m > 89.637 T - m
OK
As the Design Section Capacity is greater than the Ultimate Moment the Section is OK
[Ref: As per Cl: 15.9.4.2 of IRS Concrete Bridge Code]
Minimum Reinforcement percentage in a wall section
Ast_min = 0.2 % of bd
= ( 0.2 / 100 ) x 537.5 x 1000
= 1075 mm2 / m
Provide T- 25 @ 105 mm c/c
IN LAYER I on Earth Face
Area of Steel provided = ( π / 4 )25^2 x 1000 / 105 = 4675.00
Provide T- 0 @ 105 mm c/c
IN LAYER II on Earth Face
Area of Steel provided 25 ( π / 4 )0^2 x 1000 / 105 = 0.000

Total area of Longituidinal Steel provided, Ast = 4675 + 0


= 4675 mm2 / m
2 2
Therefore, Ast = 4675 mm / m > 1075 mm / m OK

Secondary Reinforcement
Minimum secondary reinforcement % of b d = 0.12
= ( 0.12 / 100 ) x 537.5 x 1000
= 645
Provi T- 16 @ 210 mm c/c as Transverse R/F
2
Therefore, Ast_trans = ( π / 4 )16^2 x 1000 / 210 = 957 mm / m
2 2
Therefore, Ast_trans = 957 mm / m > 645 mm / m
OK
Reinforcement on outer face
Provi T- 16 @ 210 mm c/c Vertically
2
Therefore, Ast_trans = ( π / 4 )16^2 x 1000 / 210 = 957 mm / m
2 2
Therefore, Ast_trans = 957 mm / m > 645 mm / m
OK

Provi T- 16 @ 210 mm c/c as Transverse R/F


2
Therefore, Ast_trans = ( π / 4 )16^2 x 1000 / 210 = 957 mm / m
2 2
Therefore, Ast_trans = 957 mm / m > 645 mm / m
OK

S M CONSULTANTS,BHUBANESWAR
BALLAST WALL CONSTRUCTION OF NEW B.G. LINE FROM CHHOTA UDAIPUR TO DHAR

CHECK FOR SHEAR


Therefore, Ultimate Shear Force per unit Width, Vu = 34.384 T/m
= 337.305 KN / m
As per Cl: 15.4.3 of IRS Concrete Bridge Code.
Direct Shear Stress τ = Vu / bd
= ( 337.3 x 1000 ) / ( 1000 x 537.5 )
= 0.628 N/mm2
Maximum Shear Stress = τmax
(τ max = 0.75 sqrt(f ck ) or 4.75 N / mm 2 whichever is less )

0.75 sqrt ( fck ) = 0.75 x 35^0.5


= 4.44 N / mm2

Thereτmax = Minimum of ( 4.44 , 4.75 )


= 4.44 N /mm2 > 0.628 N/mm2
OK
As per Table: 15 of IRS Concrete Bridge Code. % steel For M35
100 As / bd = 100 x ( 4675 ) / ( 1000 x 537.5 ) 0.15 0.37
= 0.87 % 0.25 0.44
2
Ultimate Shear Stress in Con τc = 0.675 N/mm 0.5 0.56
(Read from Table: 15 of IRS Concrete Bridge Code.) 1 0.7
2 0.89
As per Table : 16 of IRS Concrete Bridge Code.
Depth Factor s = ( 500 / d )1/4 Subject to Minimum 0.70
= ( 500 / 537.5 )^0.25
= 0.982
Therefore; Depth Factor s = 0.982

As per Cl: 15.5.4.1.1 s τc = 0.982 x 0.68


= 0.663 N/mm2

As per Table: 14 of IRS : Concrete Bridge Code.


Area of Lateral Shear Reinforcement to be provided is as follows:
For τ <= s τc Asv >= 0.4 b sv / 0.87 fyv
For τ > s τc Asv >= b sv ( τ + 0.4 – sτc ) / 0.87 fyv
Remark : f yv should not be more than 415 N/mm 2
From the above Values we find that τ < s τc

Diameter of Shear Reinforcement = 10 mm


Spacing of Shear Reinforcement in Vertical Direction = 210 mm
Spacing of Shear Reinforcement in Horizontal Direction = 210 mm
Therefore, Asv_provided = ( π /4 ) x 10^2 x 5
= 374 mm2 / m

Asv_required = 0.40 x 1000 x 210 / ( 0.87 x 415 )


= 232.655 mm2 / m
Since, Asv_provided is > Asv_required The Section is OK

S M CONSULTANTS,BHUBANESWAR
RCC RETURN WALL

DESIGN OF WING WALL OVER FOOTING

Design Set - At Max height

1.1 DESIGN PARAMETERS:


Wing Wall height above GL = 16.225 m (from figure)
Loading Standard = 25 T - 2008
3
Unit wt of concrete = 2.5 T/m (IS 875:1987 Part 1)
Unit wt of moist backfill = 2 T/m3 (IS 875:1987 Part 1)
Seismic Zone = II (Appendix XV, Bridge Rules)
Width of formation = 7.85 m
o
Splay Angle = 45
o
Wall angle = 7.00 (from figure)

Angle of Repose = 35.00 o (Table 1. As per soil report)

Wall Friction = 1/3 x Ф ( Cl 5.7.1Substructure & Foundation


= 11.67 o Code)
Slope of earth backfill = 0 (1 / (2 /cos 45)) (from figure)
o
= 0.00
Earth Fill Height above Abut = 0 m (assumed)
Distance of wall from Edge of Abut = 0 m
Length of sleeper = 2.75 m
Live Load Surcharge = 13.7 T/m (Table 3. Substructure & Foundation
Code, CS 28)
(From Autocad calculation for wt of
sectional area of ballast &
Dead Load Surcharge = 6.75 T/m considering sleeper density
Ballast Cushion = 350 mm 1660/km, 60 kg rails)
= 3 m (Table 3. Substructure & Foundation
Width of uniform distribution of surcharge Code, CS 28)
Grade of concrete = M 35
Grade of steel = Fe 500
Maximum Bearing Pressure = 24 T/m2

1.2 Dimensions of different elements of Wing Wall :


Width of heel slab = 0 m (from figure)
Width of toe slab = 0 m (from figure)
Wall thickness at base = 2 m (from figure)
Wall thickness at top = 0.35 m (from figure)
Base Slab thk near toe = 1.800 m (from figure)
Base Slab thk near wall = 1.800 m (from figure)
Width of base slab = 2.00 m (from figure)
Length of base slab = 1.00 m (calculated per unit width)
Wing Wall Shaft length = 1.00 m (calculated per unit width)
=

S M CONSULTANTS,BHUBANESWAR
RCC RETURN WALL

2.1 SKETCHES Formation Level

0 m Fill height
Top of Abut Level

0.35
i= 0.00

20.725
18.925 16.225

GL

2
4.5 0

1.8 1.8 1.8

A 2
Founding Level

TYPICAL ELEVATION

1.00 2

2.00
TYPICAL PLAN

S M CONSULTANTS,BHUBANESWAR
RCC RETURN WALL

3 LOAD CALCULATION

3.2 EARTH PRESSURE CALCULATION

3.2.1 Active Earth Pressure due to Backfill


(Ref CL. 5.7.1 and 5.8.4 of IRS : Substructure & Foundation Code)
Properties of Back Fill
φ = 35.00 0
= 0.611 radians
0
i = 0.00 = 0.000 radians
δ = 11.67 0
= 0.204 radians
α = 7.00 0
= 0.122 radians
γ = 2.00 T / m3 (moist backfill)

Coefficient of Active Earth Pressure


cos2 ( φ - α)
Ka =
cos2 α cos ( δ + α) 1+ sin ( φ + δ) sin(φ - i) 2
cos ( δ + α) cos (α-i)
= 0.301

(EARTH LEVEL)

18.925
20.725

11.390
1.800 (TOP OF Footing)
10.398
(BOTTOM OF Footing)

i) Pressure at Base of Stem


(Note :-The height h for action of pressure is considered as stem height only)
Earth Pressure at Wing Wall Base Ka γ h
= 0.301 x 2 x 18.925 = 11.390 T / m2

Total Force at Wing Wall Base ( Pa) 0. 5 x kaϒ h × h


0.50 x 11.39 x 18.925 x 1 = 107.773 T
Angle of inclination of Pa with Horizontal (δ + α) = 18.67 o
Horizontal Component ( Pah) = 107.773 x cos (18.67) = 102.104 T
Vertical Component ( Pav) = 107.773 x sin (18.67) = 34.494 T

Earth Pressure due to sloping surcharge Ka ϒ h h3 - in presence of fill


h = 18.925
h3 = 1/3 cotΦ × tanα × h
cotΦ = 1.428
tanα = 0.000
h3 = 0.000
Ka ϒ h h3 = 0.000 T
Angle of inclination of Pa with Horizontal (δ + α) = 18.67 o

Horizontal Component ( Pah) = 0 x cos (18.67) = 0.000 T


Vertical Component ( Pav) = 0 x sin (18.67) = 0.000 T

S M CONSULTANTS,BHUBANESWAR
RCC RETURN WALL

3.2.2 Active Earth Pressure due to Surcharge


(Ref - Cl 5.8 of SubStructure and Foundation Code )
Total Barrel Length of Abut = 7.85 + 2 x 2 x 0 = 7.850 m
Distnace from edge of sleeper to face of Wing Wall = (7.85/2 - 2.75/2 + 2 x 0 + 0 ) = 2.550 m
Depth from top h = 18.925 m
Depth from top where 45˚ dispersion line meets Wing Wall D = 2.550 m

Hence
surcharge pressure acts on Wing Wall

0.350
0.000
B
D
h 18.925 45°

h1

3.925

i) Pressure at Base of Stem


P1 = (S + V) h1 x ka - if 45˚ surcharge acts on Wing Wall
(B + 2D)

Live Load surcharge = S = 134.397 kN/m


Dead load surcharge = V = 66.2175 kN/m
width of uniform distribution = B = 3 m
Coeff of earth pressure = Ka = 0.301
h = = 18.925
h1 = = 16.725 m
D = = 2.550 m
P1 = = 124.647 kN/m
Total Force on base of Wing Wall = 12.706 T

S M CONSULTANTS,BHUBANESWAR
RCC RETURN WALL

S M CONSULTANTS,BHUBANESWAR
RCC RETURN WALL

S M CONSULTANTS,BHUBANESWAR
RCC RETURN WALL

S M CONSULTANTS,BHUBANESWAR
RCC RETURN WALL

5.0 DESIGN MOMENTS AND SHEAR


Forces Force (T) ULS Factor LA from Moment (T-
AEP - Backfill (Horizontal Component) 102.104 1.7 6.31 1094.98
AEP - Sloping Surcharge (Horizontal Component) 0.000 1.7 9.4625 0.00
AEP - Train + Track Surcharge 12.706 1.7 8.3625 180.63
114.810 1275.615

Maximum Design Moment 1275.615 Tm


Maximum Design Shear 114.810 T

6.0 REINFORCEMENTS

Grade of concrete = 35 M
Grade of steel = 500 Fe
Grade of steel for stirrup/ shear links = 415 Fe
Exposure Condition = Moderate
Clear Cover = 50 mm

2
Mu lim coeff ( R ) = 3.99 N/mm R fy
= 406.728 T/m2 fck 500
20 2.66
25 3.33
30 3.99
35 4.65

Eff. Depth Eff depth Ast


Description Moment
Required Provided Ast Required Provided Dia Spacing
Stem Main bars- Inner face 1275.615 1.771 1.934 17308.8 7659.5 32 105
7659.5 32 105
4675.0 25 105
Stem Main bars- Outer face - - 1.940 2328.0 2992.0 20 105
Stem Distribution- Inner face - - 1.934 2320.8 2992.0 20 105
Stem Distribution- Outer face - - 1.940 2328.0 1914.9 16 105

7.0 Shear Reinforcement Calculation

Eff depth Shear Ult. Shear Depth


Location Shear Force Provided Stress % steel Pt Stres factor s S x Vc
Stem 114.810 1.934 0.582 0.396 0.484 0.713 0.345

Spacing W -
Location Asv Required Asv provided Dia Spacing L -wise wise
Stem 370.534 538.559 12 210 210 OK

S M CONSULTANTS,BHUBANESWAR

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen