Sie sind auf Seite 1von 20

61. Vasserman, A. A., Kazarchinski, Ya Z. and Rabinovich, V. A., 77. Stachorsky, K. M., “Surface Tensions of Liquid Mixtures,” Z.

Elek-
“Thermophysical Properties of Air and Air Compounds,” pp. 356- trochem, 34, 111 (1928).
70, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Springfield, VA, 1971. 78. Weinaug, C., and Katz, D. L., “Surface Tension of Methane-Pro-
62. Vargaftik, N. B., “Tables on the Thermophysical Properties of Liq- pane Mixtures,” Ind. Eng. Chem. 35, 239 (1943).
uids and Gases,” 2nd Ed., p. 208, p. 346, John Wiley & Sons, New 79. Baker, O., Swerdloff, W., “Calculations of Surface Tension – 3:
York, NY, 1975. Calculations of Surface Tension Parachor Values,” Oil Gas J., 43,
63. Carmichael, L. T., and Sage, B. H., J. Chem. Eng. Data, 9, 501 141 (Dec. 5, 1955).
(1964).
80. API Technical Data Book, Ch. 10, Surface Tension.
64. Kramer, F. R. and Comings, E. W., J. Chem. Eng. Data 5, 462
81. Deam, J. R. and Maddox, R. N., “Interfacial Tension in Hydrocar-
(1960).
bon Systems,” Proc. 48th Ann. Conv. GPA, Dallas, Texas, pp. 41-
65. Touloukian, Y. S., Liley, P. E., and Saxena, S. C., “Thermal Con- 44, March, 1969.
ductivity Nonmetallic Liquids and Gases,” Thermophysical Prop-
82. Deam, J. R. and Maddox, R. N., “Interfacial Tension in Hydrocar-
erties of Matter, Vol. 3, IFI/Plenum, New York, 1970.
bon Systems,” Proc. 47th Ann. Conv. GPA, New Orleans, LA,
66. Hanley, H. J. M., Gibbs, K. E., and Murad, S. J., Phys. Chem. Ref. pp. 30-38, March, 1968.
Data, 6, 1167 (1972).
83. Bagzis, L. D. and Maddox, R. N., “Calculating Surface Tension of
67. Bonscher, F. S., Shipman, L. M., and Yen, L. C., Hyd. Proc. 53 (2)
Hydrocarbon Mixtures,” Proc. 49th Ann. Conv. GPA, Denver, CO,
107 (1974); 53 (4), 169 (1974).
pp. 41-45, March, 1970.
68. “Key Chemicals Data Book – Benzene,” p. 23, Thermodynamics
84. Hadden, S. T., Hyd. Proc., October, 161 (1966).
Research Center, Texas A&M University (1978).
85. Katz, D. L., Monroe, R. R., and Trainer, R. P., Pet. Tech., Sept.
69. “Perry’s Chemical Engineers’ Handbook,” 6th Ed., p. 247,
1943.
McGraw Hill Inc., New York, 1984.
70. API Technical Data Book, Figure 12 B 1.1 (Oct. 1964). 86. Quale, O. R., Chem. Rev., 53, 439 (1953).

71. Lenoir, J. M., and Comings, E. W., Chem. Eng. Prog. 47, 223 (1951). 87. Ritter, R. B., Lenoir, J. M., and Schweppe, J. L., Pet. Ref. 37 No. 11,
225 (1958).
72. Hilrath, J. et al., NBS Circular No. 564 (1955).
88. Carr, N. L., Kobayashi, R, and Burrows, D. B., Trans. AIME 201,
73. Schaefer, C. A., and Thodos, G., Ind. Eng. Chem., 50, 1585 (1958).
264 (1954).
74. Haran, E. N., Maitland, G. C., Mustafa, M., and Wakeham, W. A.,
89. Adler, S. B., Hall, K. R., “Use Correlation for Oil Properties,” Hy-
“The Thermal Conductivity of Argon, Nitrogen and Carbon Mon-
drocarbon Processing, November 1985, pp. 71-75.
oxide in the Temperature Range 300-430 K at Pressures up to 10
MPa,” Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 87, 657-663 (1983). 90. Private Communication May, 1997, R.N. Maddox and M. Mosh-
75. LeNeindre, B., Tufeu, R., Bury, P., and Sengers, J. V., “Thermal feghian.
Conductivity of Carbon Dioxide and Steam in the Supercritical 91. Soave, G., Chem. Eng. Sci., Vol. 27, No. 6 (1972), p. 1197.
Region,” Ber. Bunsen-Gesellschaft 77 No. 4, 262-275 (1973). 92. Hankinson, R.W. and G.H. Thomson, AIChE J. 25: 671, 1979.
76. Sugden, S., “The Variation of Surface Tension. VI. The Variation
of Surface Tension with Temperature and Some Related Func-
tions,” J. Chem. Soc. 125, 32 (1924).

23-43
NOTES:

23-44
SECTION 24

Thermodynamic Properties
This section contains thermodynamic charts, correlations, the use of total enthalpy charts.
and calculation procedures.
An entropy correlation and an example calculation showing
The enthalpy correlation presents a rigorous method for cal- its use are also presented.
culation of enthalpy, followed by an example calculation illus-
trating the use of the associated charts. Also included is a
quicker, approximate method for enthalpy determinations by

FIG. 24-1
Nomenclature

H = enthalpy at desired conditions, Btu/lb mole, or Btu/lb Sp gr = specific gravity, dimensionless


H0 = ideal gas state enthalpy V = specific volume, cu ft/lb
H00 = enthalpy datum at zero pressure and zero hf = enthalpy of liquid, Btu/lb (Steam Tables)
temperature hg = enthalpy of gas, Btu/lb
H0T = ideal gas state enthalpy at temperature T hfg = enthalpy of vaporization (hg – hf)
HPT = enthalpy at desired pressure and temperature sf = entropy of liquid, Btu/(lb • °R)(Steam Tables)
MW = molecular weight sg = entropy of gas, Btu/(lb • °R)
P = absolute pressure, psia sfg = entropy change on vaporization (sg – sf)
Pc = critical or pseudocritical pressure, psia vf = specific volume of liquid, cu ft/lb (Steam Tables)
Pr = reduced pressure = P/P c vg = specific volume of gas, cu ft/lb
Pk = convergence pressure for multi-component vfg = specific volume change on vaporization (vg – vf)
systems, psia xi = mole fraction of component i in liquid phase
T = absolute temperature, °R yi = mole fraction of component i in vapor phase
Tc = critical or pseudocritical temperature, °R Greek
Tr = reduced temperature = T/T c Σi = summation for all components
R = gas constant, Fig.1-4 ω = acentric factor
°R = degrees Rankine = °F + 459.7 Subscripts
S = entropy, Btu/(lb mole • °R), or Btu/(lb • °R) m = mixture property
S0 = ideal gas state entropy i = any one component in a multicomponent mixture
Acentric Factor: A factor frequently used in correlating another pressure and/or temperature and returned to its
thermodynamic properties — defined by ω = log Pvr – 1.00 original condition.
where Pvr = reduced vapor pressure at Tr = 0.7. Mole(s): A mass of substance corresponding to its molecular
Corresponding States: The theory that proposes pure com- weight, expressed usually either as lb-moles or gm-moles.
ponents and mixtures have the same relative thermody- Phase Envelope: The boundaries of an area on the P-T dia-
namic properties when at the same relative thermodynamic gram for the material which encloses the region where both
state. vapor and liquid coexist.
Critical Pressure: The vapor pressure at the critical tem- Quality: The weight fraction of vapor in a vapor-liquid mix-
perature. ture.
Critical Temperature: The temperature above which a com- Reduced Pressure: The ratio of the absolute pressure to the
ponent cannot be liquefied. For mixtures, the temperature critical pressure.
above which all of the mixture cannot be liquid.
Reduced Temperature: The ratio of the absolute tempera-
Datum: A reference point.
ture to the critical temperature.
Density: Mass per unit volume of a substance.
Enthalpy: Heat content, H, composed of internal energy, E, Saturated Water: Water at its boiling temperature for the
and flow energy, PV. Usually expressed as H = E + PV. pressure exerted on it.
Entropy: A thermodynamic quantity, S, defined by the equa- Saturated Steam: Steam at the boiling temperature of
tion – dS = dQ/T where Q is the amount of heat entering or water for the pressure exerted on it but containing no liquid
leaving the system at absolute temperature, T. water.
Ideal Gas: A gas which follows the equation PV = nRT where Specific Volume: The volume of a substance per unit mass.
n = number of moles. (Inverse of density.)
Irreversibility: The degree of heat or work that is lost when Thermodynamics: The science which deals with the energy
a system is taken from one pressure and temperature to of systems and its changes and effects.

24-1
ENTHALPY BEHAVIOR (H0T − HPT) the change of enthalpy with pressure, given
by the enthalphy difference between the
The change of enthalpy with temperature and pressure is ideal gas state enthalpy and the enthalpy at
complex. Predicting the enthalpy for a pure component or mix- the desired pressure, both quantities at the
ture is multi-step procedure that requires information that specified temperature, Btu/lb mole.
can only be obtained by experimental measurement. For pure
Since H00 is zero at the chosen datum, zero absolute tempera-
components, use of a P-H diagram like those shown in Figs.
24-22 to 24-35 is recommended. ture, Equation 24-1 can be written:
HPT = H0T − (H0T − HPT) Eq 24-2
The enthalpy behavior of mixtures can be predicted through
thermodynamic correlations. Use of a good contemporary Which can be simplified to:
equation of state is recommended for mixture enthalpy pre-
H = H0 − (H0 − H) Eq 24-3
dictions. Fig. 24-2 shows graphically the change in enthalpy
of three gas streams and two liquid streams as pressure is Values for the change of enthalpy with pressure for a real
changed at constant temperature. Values for the plot were gas or liquid are obtained from a correlation based on the prin-
calculated by the Soave10 version of the Redlich-Kwong equa- ciple of corresponding states.2 The original correlation was ex-
tion of state11. The curves in Fig. 24-2 are for no phase change tended to low reduced temperatures3 to cover low temperature
and show typical behavior of gas phase enthalpy decreasing gas processing applications. The correlation shown in Figs. 24-
and liquid phase enthalpy increasing with increasing pres- 6 and 24-7 consists of two parts. One part gives the change of
sure. enthalpy with pressure for a simple fluid (fluid with zero acen-
tric factor). The second part is a correction for deviation of a
Enthalpies for mixtures of real gases and liquids can be pre-
real fluid from the ideal fluid change of enthalpy with pres-
dicted by hand calculation methods. The ones recommended
sure. The value of (H0 –H) in Eq. 24-3 is calculated by:
for use are based on an extension of the principle of corre-
(0) (′)
sponding states and are shown graphically in Fig. 24-6 and  
24-7.  (H − H)
0
  (H0− H)  
(H0− H) = RTc   +ω   Eq 24-4
 RT c   RTc  
Ideal Gas State Enthalpies  

Enthalpies for pure component gases are readily correlated where:


as a power series of temperature for a wide range of compo-
[(H0 −H) / RTc](0) the change of enthalpy of a simple
nents including all of those that occur in natural gas streams. fluid with pressure from Fig. 24-6.
Typical values for natural gas components are plotted in Figs.
24-3 and 24-4 for temperatures from -200 to 900°F. Enthalpies [(H0 −H) / RTc]( ′) deviation from the change for a sim-
for gas mixtures can be obtained as the mole fraction average ple fluid from Fig. 24-7
if molar enthalpies are used, or the weight fraction average if Figs. 24-6 and 24-7 can be used for gas and liquid mixtures.
mass enthalpies are used. If the mixture is a gas, use the lower chart in each figure. For
Many natural gas streams contain undefined, or pseudo, liquids read the value from the isotherms at the top of the
components. Ideal gas enthalpies for pseudo components are chart. The units of (H0 –H) will depend on the units of the
shown in Fig. 24-5. To use Fig. 24-5 the specific gravity, mo- universal gas constant, R, and Tc. For (H0 –H) in Btu/lb mole,
lecular weight and temperature (relative density, molecular R=1.986 Btu/(lb mole • °R) and Tc is in °R.
mass and temperature) must be known. Fig. 24-5 is for paraf- The reduced temperature and pressure are defined as Tr =
finic mixtures and should not be used for pseudo components T/Tc and Pr = P/Pc, where absolute temperature and pressure
derived form aromatic crude oils. must be used. Values for pure component critical temperature,
The enthalpy datum chosen is zero enthalpy at zero absolute pressure and acentric factor are in Section 23 Physical Prop-
pressure and zero absolute temperature, the same datum as erties. Section 23 also contains graphs relating ASTM distil-
used in API Project 44.1 The choice of datum is arbitrary and lation temperature, molecular weight, specific gravity
a matter of convenience. Enthalpy differences, the values of (relative density), critical temperature, and critical pressure
interest, are not affected by the datum chosen. However, the for undefined fractions. The fraction acentric factor can be es-
same enthalpy datum should be used for all components in timated from Eq 23-17.
any one calculation.
To use Figs. 24-6 and 24-7, the mixture composition must be
known. The mole fraction average (pseudo) critical tempera-
CHANGE OF ENTHALPY WITH PRESSURE ture and pressure are calculated using Kay’s Rule4 as illus-
For purposes of correlation and calculation, the ideal and trated in Fig. 23-3 (TCm = ΣyiTCi and PCm = ΣyiPCi). The mole
real gas behaviors are treated separately. The mixture ideal fraction average mixture enthalpy is calculated from:
gas enthalpy at a specified temperature is calculated; the H0m = ΣyiH0i Eq 24-5
enthalpy change of the real gas mixture is calculated from
a correlation prepared from experimental enthalpy meas- The values of H0i
are obtained by multiplying the enthalpy
urements on a variety of mixtures. This relation can be ex- value from Figs. 24-3 and 24-4 by the molecular weight of the
pressed as: individual component.
HPT − H00 = (H0T − H00) − (H0T − HPT) Eq 24-1 The mole fraction average acentric factor is calculated:
where: ωm = Σyi ωi Eq 24-6
(H0T − H00) the ideal gas state enthalpy above the da- The information necessary to evaluate enthalpies for the
tum, H0, at the desired temperature (sub- mixture from Figs. 24-3 to 24-7 is now known. Use of the
script T), Btu/lb mole method will be clearer after study of the following illustrative
calculation.

24-2
EXAMPLE CALCULATION EXAMPLE CALCULATION USING
USING ENTHALPY CORRELATION ENTROPY CORRELATION
A gas with the composition shown in Fig. 24-8 is at 120°F The same gas as in the enthalpy example (shown in Fig.
and 1010 psia. Using Figs. 24-3 and 24-4 calculate the en- 24-18) is at 120°F and 1010 psia. The pseudo criticals, acentric
thalpy of the gas. Following the example in Fig. 23-6, the mole factor, reduced temperature, and reduced pressure have the
fraction average critical temperature is calculated as 370.7°R, same values as in the enthalpy example. The mixture ideal gas
and the pseudo critical pressure as 669.1 psia. Following the state entropy is 52.2 Btu/(lb mole •°R). The value read from
same procedure, the mixture acentric factor is 0.02476 and the Fig. 24-20 is 0.345 and that from Fig. 24-21 is 0.065. These
molar enthalpy 4885.7 Btu/lb mole. With a reduced tempera- combine to give (remember P in lnP must be in atmospheres)
ture of 1.564 and a reduced pressure of 1.509, the reading from a real gas entropy of 44.05 Btu/(lb mole •°R).
Fig. 24-6 is 0.70 and from Fig. 24-7 is 0.020, which give a mix-
ture enthalpy at 120°F and 1010 psia of 4370.0 Btu/lb mole. REFERENCES
The total enthalpy charts shown in Figs. 24-9 to 24-17 offer 1. API Research Project 44, “Data on Hydrocarbons and Related
a rapid means of calculating enthalpy changes on essentially Compounds,” A & M Press, College Station, Texas.
the same basis as previously described. They may be used in- 2. Curl, R. F., Jr. and Pitzer, K. S., Ind. Eng. Chem., 50, 1958, p. 265.
stead of carrying out the detailed component-wise calculations
3. Chao, K. C. and Greenkorn, R. A., GPA Research Report RR-3,
for mixture enthalpies. The charts cover the range of compo-
Gas Processors Association, Tulsa, Oklahoma, April 1971.
sitions, pressures and temperatures encountered in most
natural gas systems. 4. Kay, W. B., Ind. Eng. Chem., 28, 1936, p. 1014.
5. Jacoby, R. H. and Yarborough, L., Technical Report to GPA, 1966.
The total enthalpy charts were developed from results cal-
culated for synthesized binary mixtures of the pure component 6. ASME Steam Tables, 3rd Ed., Amer. Soc. of Mech. Eng., New York,
normal paraffin hydrocarbons next lighter and heavier than N.Y., 1967.
the mixture mole weights indicated. The calculations were car- 7. Keenan, J. H., Keyes, F. G., Hill, P. G. and Moore, J. G., “Steam
ried out by a computer program which interpolated between Tables,” John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y., 1969.
adjacent values in the tabulated values of enthalpy departure 8. Ely, J. F., Private Communication, 1985.
reported by Curl and Pitzer.2
9. “Technical Data Book — Petroleum Refining,” 3rd Ed., American
Ideal gas enthalpy values for each pure normal paraffin Petroleum Institute, Washington, D.C., 1977.
component were calculated and used to calculate the ideal gas 10. Soave, G., “Equilibrium Constants from a Modified Redlich-
mixture enthalpy. The ideal gas state enthalpy equation used Kwong Equation of State,” Chem. Eng. Sci., Vol. 27, No. 6, pp.
for methane, ethane and propane was a curve fit of the data 1197-1203, 1972.
shown in Fig. 24-3. For butane and heavier components, a 11. Maddox, R.N. and Moshfeghian, M., Private Communication, 1996.
fourth order polynomial was used with coefficients taken from
the API Data Book, Table A1.2.9 The fifth coefficient reported BIBLIOGRAPHY
in the API table was dropped to convert to the 0°R, 0 psia
enthalpy datum. 1. “Technical Data Book—Petroleum Refining,” 3rd Ed., American
Ideal gas enthalpies were corrected for pressure changes by Petroleum Institute, Washington, D.C., 1977.
interpolating the tabular data used to compile Figs. 24-6 and 2. Reid, R. D., Prausnitz, J. M. and Sherwood, T. K., “The Properties
24-7. Pressure calculations were made from reduced pressures of Gases and Liquids,” 3rd Ed., McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York,
of 0.2 to 3,000 psia. Temperatures ranged from -300°F or Tr = N.Y., 1977.
0.35 minimum to 600°F maximum. 3. Kesler, M. G. and Lee, B. I., “Improve Prediction of Enthalpy of
Fractions,” Hydrocarbon Processing, 55, 1976, pp. 153-158.
Caution. Some mixtures encountered in the calculations
fell inside the phase envelopes of Figs. 24-6 and 24-7, Rather 4. Wormald, C. J., “Thermo Data for Steam/Hydrocarbons,” Hydro-
than extrapolate into the phase envelopes of Figs. 24-6 and carbon Processing, May 1982, pp. 137-141.
24-7. for enthalpy pressure corrections, the total enthalpies 5. Lee, M. C., Ratcliffe, A. E., Maddox, R. D., Parham, W. F. and
were first generated, plotted, and then extrapolated. Maddox, R. N., “Heat Capacity Determined for Crude Fractions,”
Hydrocarbon Processing, June 1978, pp. 187-189.
Vapor enthalpies at 150 psia were extended to lower tem-
peratures by assuming the relative enthalpy change with 6. Yu, W. C., Lee, H. M. and Ligon, R. M., “Predicted High Pressure
temperature to be the same as for an ideal gas. Properties,” Hydrocarbon Processing, Jan. 1982, pp. 171-178.
7. “Properties for Light Petroleum Systems,” Gulf Publishing Co.,
ENTROPY CORRELATION Houston, Texas, 1973.
8. Canjar, L. N. and Manning, F. S., “Thermodynamic Properties and Re-
Entropy is most used as a guide for interpreting the behavior duced Correlations of Gases,” Gulf Publishing Co., Houston, Texas, 1967.
of gases and liquids in compression and expansion processes. 9. Weber, J. H., “Predict Latent Heats of Vaporization,” Chemical
The entropy of a multicomponent mixture may be calculated Engineering, Jan. 14, 1980.
by combing ideal gas state entropies from API 441 with the
10. Starling, K. E., “Fluid Thermodynamic Properties for Light Pe-
Curl and Pitzer2 tables of values for the change of entropy with
troleum Systems,” Gulf Publishing Co., Houston, Texas 1973.
pressure. Entropy equations for undefined mixtures (pseudo
components) are not available but, for most uses where the 11. Maddox, R. N. and L. Lilly, “Gas Conditioning and Processing,”
pseudo components are present in small concentration, they Vol. 3, Campbell Petroleum Series Inc., Norman, Oklahoma, 1990.
can satisfactorily be approximated by the nearest molecular 12. Van Ness, H. C. and Abbott, M. M., “Classical Thermodynamics
weight paraffin hydrocarbon. of Non-Electrolyte Solutions,” McGraw-Hill, N.Y., 1982.

24-3
Revised (5-99)
FIG. 24-2
Influence of Pressure on Enthalpy for Typical Natural Gas Streams

24-4
FIG. 24-3
Ideal-Gas-State Enthalpy of Pure Components

24-5
FIG. 24-4
Ideal-Gas-State Enthalpy of Pure Components

24-6
FIG. 24-5
Ideal-Gas-State Enthalpy of Petroleum Fractions

24-7
FIG. 24-6
Effect of Pressure on Enthalpy (Simple Fluid)

24-8
FIG. 24-7
Effect of Pressure on Enthalpy
(Correction for Real Fluids)

24-9
FIG. 24-8
Example Enthalpy Calculation

Component Mole Molecular Critical Critical Acentric Ideal Gas


Fraction Weight Temp. °R. Pressure Factor Enthalpy
psia Btu/lb

Methane 0.9010 16.04 343.0 667.0 0.0108 292

Carbon Dioxide 0.0106 44.01 547.4 1069.5 0.2667 100

Ethane 0.0499 30.07 549.7 707.8 0.0972 189

Propane 0.0187 44.1 665.6 615.0 0.1515 162

i-Butane 0.0065 58.12 734.1 527.9 0.1852 151

n-Butane 0.0045 58.12 765.2 548.8 0.1981 162

i-Pentane 0.0017 72.15 828.6 490.4 0.2286 151

n-Pentane 0.0019 72.15 845.4 488.1 0.2510 158

Hexane 0.0052 86.18 911.5 439.5 0.2990 139

IDEAL GAS STATE ENTHALPY Btu/lb mol 4885.7

PSEUDO CRITICAL TEMPERATURE °R 370.7

REDUCED TEMPERATURE 1.564

PSEUDO CRITICAL PRESSURE psia 669.1

REDUCED PRESSURE 1.509

MOLE FRACTION AVERAGE ACENTRIC FACTOR 0.02476

[(H0 –H) / RTC](0) from Fig. 24-6 0.70


0 (’)
[(H –H) / RTC] from Fig. 24-7 0.020
[(H0 –H)m / RTC] = [(H0 –H) / RTC](0) +
[wm [(H0 –H) / RTC] (’) 0.7005
(H0 –H)m, Btu/lb mole 515.7
H, Btu/lb mole 4370.0

NOTE: Ideal Gas Enthalpy for Hexane from Fig. 24-9.


Wichert and Aziz correction not applied to critical properties.

24-10 Revised (5-99)


FIG. 24-9
Total Enthalpy of Paraffin Hydrocarbon Vapor

24-11
FIG. 24-10
Total Enthalpy of Paraffin Hydrocarbon Vapor

24-12
FIG. 24-11
Total Enthalpy of Paraffin Hydrocarbon Vapor

24-13
FIG. 24-12
Total Enthalpy of Paraffin Hydrocarbon Vapor

24-14
FIG. 24-13
Total Enthalpy of Paraffin Hydrocarbon Vapor

24-15
FIG. 24-14
Total Enthalpy of Paraffin Hydrocarbon Vapor

24-16
FIG. 24-15
Total Enthalpy of Paraffin Hydrocarbon Vapor

24-17
FIG. 24-16
Total Enthalpy of Paraffin Hydrocarbon Liquid

24-18

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen