Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
• RECAPITULATION
of the previous
lesson/topic
• Questions and
clarifications
URBANIZATION
• Phenomenon by which a
community or settlement gradually
or rapidly acquires an urban
character.
• Growth in the proportion of a
population living in an urban place
• A process that has a beginning and
an end
• A process associated with the
development of civilization
• Redistribution of population from
rural to urban settlement
(migration)
URBANIZATION
• Geographic concentration of
population & non-agricultural
activities in urban environments
in varying size and form.
• Process by which rural areas
became transformed into urban
areas
• Demographically, an increase in
population concentration
(numbers and density);
movement of people to cities,
other densely settled areas.
DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTICS
• Level of Urbanization –
proportion of people living in
urban areas
• Urban Growth – population
rate of growth
(increase/decrease) in urban
areas
• Pace of Urbanization –
average change in the level
of urbanization (change in
level/time period)
Degree (Level) of Urbanization
Industrialization FACTORS that hastened
Urbanization
& Urbanization (Europe)
• In general, industrialization Unprecedented population growth in
the countryside
begets industrialization Mechanization, rising productivity,
– British, European: and labor shedding in agriculture
Rural population as continuous
Industrialization was the supply of factory workers
catalyst for urban Rural population as source of
domestic help
growth (factories gave rise City-ward migration
to towns) (USA)
Agricultural revolution took place
– New World (American): side by side with industrial
Industrialization revolution
followed urbanization Migration of redundant farm labor
from the south to northern cities
(towns gave rise to Immigration of Europeans “to empty
factories) lands of the earth”
Urbanization in the 1A. Spanish Colonial
Philippines: Historical Period
Perspective Pre-colonial natives had free
Spanish land policy has led access to common land: to
to the dispossession of work and/or to own
native inhabitants
American colonial policy of
Upon colonial contact, the
speculative land King of Spain awarded large
development also led to the land grants to Spaniards
marginalization of peasants Masses of native inhabitants
Post-war post-colonial rural- were left landless,
to-urban migration, dispossessed
accelerated
suburbanization, and Native elite also received
further contributed to the land grants taken from
marginalization of the poor. formerly common lands
Social Structure During During the later part of the
Early Spanish Regime Spanish regime, the
(Late 16th-Early 17th Century)
Spaniards acquired more
Spaniards > accumulated lands for export crops
lands by purchase, cultivation in large landed
donations, trickery estates
Native Principalia > More landless peasants
appropriated common lands and laborers became farm
for their private property workers or share croppers
in the big haciendas
Chinese > also consolidated
lands from the masses The social structure
became more complex but
Landless Masses > poor
the poor as always
majority, dispossessed
occupied the bottom
Social Structure During Spanish Urbanization
Later Spanish Regime Policy
Absentee Landlords > Native settlements were too
Spaniards including friar small and dispersed to be
orders Christianized effectively
Salaried Administrators >
Spanish friars reduced the
Spanish nationals
umbers of native
Big Inquilino (non-cultivating
settlements to a few larger
renter) > Most privileged;
former principalia & Chinese ”pueblos” or town
mestizo Within each town there was
Small Inquilino (cultivating an urban core called
renter) > Native “poblacion” & rural
Aparceros (sharecroppers or hinterlands called “barrios”
salaried workers) > Poor (taga-bayan at taga-bukid)
majority, native
Outer Urban fringe Rural hinterland
Rural sector Inner
barrio
developers
Resettlement of squatters from
the urban core to fringe areas
No distinct spatial pattern for
the poor; they are everywhere Morphological Type 3
Comparative Urbanization Experience
Third World Western
Driven mainly by Driven by economic and
demographic forces industrial forces
Industrialization lags Involves gradual innovation
behind urbanization and and interdependent
migrants find employment economic and social
opportunities in cities change spanning more than
a century
Third World cities are more
healthful than their rural Early industrial cities were
counterparts death traps
Death control gains Fall in mortality years took
achieved in 20 years over 70-80 years
Development is Development led by private
government-led with capital and entrepreneurial
foreign economic and class
technical assistance
• Suburbanization – expansion of
the city, primarily of residential
areas spreading into the
countryside
• Urban Sprawl – result of
unplanned, uncontrolled spreading
of urban development into areas
adjoining the edges of the city.
• Gentrification – the process of
renewal & rebuilding
accompanying the influx of middle-
class or affluent people into
deteriorating areas that often
displaces poorer residents
Urbanization is a population shift from rural to urban areas, "the
gradual increase in the proportion of people living in urban
areas", and the ways in which each society adapts to the
change.
Process whereby a place becomes urban, i.e., it ceases to be
rural…experiences a large concentration of population that is
changing from rural to urban way of life.
Urban-Rural Dichotomy
Rural Urban Proponent
Sacred Secular H. Becker
Folk Urban Redfield
Ascription Achievement T. Parsons
Particularistic Universalistic F. Riggs
Traditional Rational M. Weber
“True change starts from within a person’s heart,
mind and spirit and works outward as reflected by
attitudes and actions.” – John C. Bergstrom
City life is characterized
by some level of
formality and a
severance of familial
relationships or
kinship ties.
Cities can become
concentrations of
pollution, squalor
and decay due to
overcrowding,
vehicular traffic and
crime.
Implications of Urbanization
Implications of Urbanization
Human Settlements – approach looking at cities as
physical locations for groups of human beings, which
should have the key elements for biological survival
and social interaction.
Human Settlement (UN ESCAP) means the totality of the
human community - whether city, town or village - with all
the social, material, organizational, spiritual and cultural
elements that sustain it.
The fabric of human settlements consists of physical elements
and services to which these elements provide the material
support. The physical components comprise the following:
shelter, infrastructure, and services.
Shelter, i.e. the superstructures of In 1973, Human Settlement
different shapes, size, type and Commission (EO 419)
materials erected by mankind for decrees 11 basic services
security, privacy and protection from (needs) of man in a
the elements and for his singularity settlement:
within a community; Education, Clothing, Shelter,
Medical Services, Ecological
Infrastructure, i.e. the complex
Balance, Mobility, Economy,
networks designed to deliver to or
Sports & Recreation
remove from the shelter people,
goods, energy or information;
Services cover those required by a
community for the fulfillment of its Power
functions as a social body, such as
Food
education, health, culture, welfare,
recreation and nutrition (UN Economic &
Social Commission for Asia & the Pacific) Water
Konstantinos Doxiadis, Greek
Theorist rationalized HS as a
science which includes
Economics
planning and design with
contributions from different
specializations. Culture
Social
Sciences
EKISTICS
Creating better settlements for science of human
settlements
tomorrow can be understood
better looking at the various Technical
Aspects
Pol. Science
& Admin.
elements of HS.
Ekistics units or ELS = man,
room, dwelling, dwelling
group, small neighborhood,
neighborhood, small town,
town, large city, metro,
conurbation, megalopolis,
urban region, urbanized
continent, ecumenopolis
Classifications:
Function administrative,
recreational, industrial,
tourism. Financial, religious,
educational, etc.
Evolutionary Phases nomadic,
agricultural, urban-agricultural,
towns and cities
Factors legislation, labor,
financing, etc.
Discipline cultural, social,
technical, political-admin.
Hierarchy of Settlement
In the Philippine setting, HS growth is closely tied to population dynamics.
“PUSH” factor – rural “PULL” factor – rural
population are forced to population are
migrate to urban areas due encouraged to migrate to
to the following situations in urban areas due to the
the countryside: following:
1. Lack of income 1. Job opportunities and
opportunity higher income
2. Absence of acceptable 2. Modern facilities and
facilities better services
3. Undue resource and 3. Higher quality of
environmental environment
exploitation 4. Higher standard of
4. Continuing poverty living
situation 5. Vibrant social life
5. Aggravated “bright light
helplessness syndrome” or “the big
6. Armed conflicts city phenomenon”
Population Dynamics
• Population dynamics shape the principle social, economic
and environmental challenges that humankind is
confronting this century. To promote the wellbeing of
current and future generations, which is the ultimate
objective of sustainable development, we must therefore
systematically consider and plan for population dynamics.
energy
water
social inequality
and protection