Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
DEFINITION / EXPLANATION
ENUMERATION
In order that a case for (i.e. B.P. 22) to prosper, the following elements must be
attendant/present:
To constitute (i.e. homicide), the following requisites must concur:
(i.e. Legal compensation) requires the concurrence of the following conditions:
To establish a person’s culpability under (i.e. estafa), it is indispensable that…
DISTINCTION
1. The (i.e. two) may be distinguished from each other in the followings
ways:
b.
2. In the first, it is necessary that there be….., whereas in the second it is sufficient
that there be ….
In the former, … while in the latter…
4. The former requires … while the latter…
JURISDICTION
1. The case is beyond the ambit of the jurisdiction of the (i.e. Regional TrialCourt)
The case of (i.e. ejectment) lies with the Municipal Trial Court.
The case is cognizable by the (i.e. Regional Trial Court)
The case is covered by the (Rules on Summary Procedure).
The law vests upon the (i.e. Secretary of Justice) the power to…
CITING LAW PROVISIONS
1. No less than the (i.e. 1987 Constitution) provides for the…
12. Worth remembering is the rule on _______________ which provides in part that…
13. Decisive on the matter is the pertinent provision of the (i.e. Law on Property)
In a long-line of cases decided by the Supreme Court, it has always been (consistently) held
that…
3. In a litany of cases decided by the Supreme Court,
In one case decided by the highest court of the land, it was held that
8. In one case, the Supreme Court ruled that
13. The Supreme Court has steadfastly adhered to the doctrine which states that
14. In a case with similar facts, the Supreme Court ruled that…
15. In several notable Supreme Court decisions, the highest court declared that…
16. The Supreme Court has often stressed that…
17. In the landmark case of _____________, (if the case is so famous) the Supreme Court
laid down the doctrine which substantially provides that…
21. A case in point is a case already decided by no other than the highest court of the land,
where the Supreme Court held that…
22. There is likewise an array of cases in this jurisdiction where the Supreme Court has
consistently declared that…
24. In one case, the Supreme Court was emphatic when it ruled that….
REFERRING BACK TO THE CASE (correlating the facts with the law/jurisprudence)
11. It is a futile gesture on the part of the respondent to invoke the rule on…
14. The position of the petitioner runs counter with the doctrine of…
20. The court cannot countenance the (i.e. inconsistent postures of the petitioner)
30. A contrary conclusion would erode the rule that provides in part that…
31. To sustain the contention would be to render the law on ____________ nugatory.
32. It would be absurd and incongruous to sustain the argument that…
37. The petitioner cannot give any additional meaning to the clear and plain language of the
law.
38. The Supreme Court, in several cases, has struck down the (i.e. defense of alibi)
39. The attendant circumstances of the case are contrary to the petitioner’s assertion.
40. The evidence does not support the theory of the petitioners.
41. There is no cogent reason to disturb the ruling of the (i.e. Court of Appeals)
42. The claim for (i.e. moral damages) must necessarily fail.
43. The (i.e. respondent) cannot rely on (i.e. mere alibis) to aid his cause.
CONCLUDING WORDS
1. From the gamut of evidence on hand, it can be gathered/deduced that,…
3. Finally, …
4. Hence, …
5. Therefore, …
6. From the foregoing, it can be deduced that there is really (i.e. a violation of…)
8. Lastly, …
9. Consequently,…