Report of Soil Investigation-Approve PDF

REPORT OF SOIL INVESTIGATION
Issued 20-JUN-18 Doc No : T3139-ALO-ENG-CVL-STU-0002 Rev.2 Page2of59
REVISION HISTORICAL SHEET
Rev No Date Description
0 12/04/18 Issued for Approval

TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS .........................................................................................................3

INDEX OF FIGURES ..............................................................................................................7
1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................8
1.1 General......................................................................................................................................... 8
1.2 Project Location .......................................................................................................................... 8
1.3 Performance of Project ............................................................................................................... 9
1.4 Objectives .................................................................................................................................. 10
1.5 Structure of Report.................................................................................................................... 10
2 SCOPE OF WORKS ........................................................................................................11
2.1 Scope ......................................................................................................................................... 11
2.2 Personnel and Equipment ........................................................................................................ 12
2.3 Performance .............................................................................................................................. 14
2.3.1 Soil Investigation Works .............................................................................................. 14
2.3.2 Laboratory Works ........................................................................................................ 19
3 FIELD INVESTIGATION AND LAB RESULTS................................................................ 21
3.1 Site Condition (Location of Points) .......................................................................................... 21
3.2 Drilling........................................................................................................................................ 21
3.3 CPT Testing ............................................................................................................................... 22
3.4 Chemical Lab Testing ............................................................................................................... 22
3.5 Subsurface Soil Stratigraphy ................................................................................................... 23
3.5.1 General Stratigraphy ................................................................................................... 23
3.5.2 Specific Boreholes....................................................................................................... 24
3.6 Lab Test Soil .............................................................................................................................. 24
4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION AND PARAMETER ........................................................... 25
4.1 Regional Geology...................................................................................................................... 25
4.2 Seismicity .................................................................................................................................. 25
4.2.1 Soil Profile for Seismic Purposes................................................................................. 26
4.2.2 Response Spectrum According to SNI-03-1726-2012 ................................................. 27
4.3 Subsurface Characterization .................................................................................................... 30

4.4 Recommended Design Parameter............................................................................................ 30
4.4.1 Detailed Borehole Parameters..................................................................................... 33
5 ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION...........................................................................34
5.1 General Recommendations ...................................................................................................... 34
5.2 Analysis Methods...................................................................................................................... 34
5.3 Earthworks (Excavation)........................................................................................................... 34
5.4 Shallow Foundation .................................................................................................................. 35
5.4.1 Bearing Capacity ......................................................................................................... 36
5.4.2 Uplift Capacity ............................................................................................................. 38
5.5 Deep Foundation ....................................................................................................................... 38
5.5.1 Static Axial Compression and Tension Capacity.......................................................... 38
5.5.2 Allowable Capacity ...................................................................................................... 41
5.5.3 Recommended Piling Depth ........................................................................................ 42
5.5.4 Lateral Response ........................................................................................................ 44
5.5.5 Pile Spacing ................................................................................................................ 48
5.5.6 Pile Settlement ............................................................................................................ 49
5.5.7 Pile Driving .................................................................................................................. 53
5.5.8 Cement Type Selection ............................................................................................... 54
5.5.9 Corrosion..................................................................................................................... 54
5.5.10 Liquifection .................................................................................................................. 56
TABLE OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX.A SITE MAP

APPENDIX.B BOREHOLE LOGS
APPENDIX.C CPT LOGS
APPENDIX.D GEOTECH CROSS SECTIONS
APPENDIX.E CHEMICAL LAB TEST RESULTS
APPENDIX.F SPUN PILE AXIAL BEARING CAPACITY CALCULATION
APPENDIX.G SHALLOW BEARING CAPACITY CALCULATION
APPENDIX.H LIQUIFECTION ANALYSIS
APPENDIX.I LATERAL PILE
APPENDIX.J DOCUMENTATION
INDEX OF TABLES
Table 1-1 Performance Dates of Works ............................................................................................. 9

Table 2-1 Actual Scope of Works Done ........................................................................................... 11
Table 2-2 Equipment Mobilized........................................................................................................ 12
Table 2-3 Personnel Performed ....................................................................................................... 13
Table 2-4 Chemical Tests Done on Ground Water Samples ............................................................ 20
Table 2-5 Chemical Tests Done on Sediment Samples ................................................................... 20
Table 3-1 Borehole Coordinates, Ground water and Elevation......................................................... 21
Table 3-2 CPT Results..................................................................................................................... 22
Table 3-3 Water Sample Chemical Results...................................................................................... 22
Table 3-4 Sediment Sample Chemical Results ................................................................................ 23
Table 3-5 Soil Type at BH-01 ........................................................................................................... 24
Table 3-6 Soil Type at BH-02 ........................................................................................................... 24
Table 4-1 Soil Classification According to SNI 1726-2012................................................................ 26
Table 4-1 Calculation of Seismic Soil Type (BH-01)......................................................................... 26
Table 4-1 Calculation of Seismic Soil Type (BH-02)......................................................................... 27
Table 4-2 Site Coefficient Fa............................................................................................................ 28
Table 4-3 Site Coefficient Fv............................................................................................................ 29
Table 4-4 Recommended Parameters for Design for BH-01 ............................................................ 33
Table 4-5 Recommended Parameters for Design for BH-02 ............................................................ 33
Table 5-1 Brief of Calculation Methods ............................................................................................ 34
Table 5-3 Limiting Values of Pile Bearing Capacity (API RP2 WSD) ................................................ 40
Table 5-4 Recommended Piling Depth and Capacity of Spun Pile ................................................... 42
Table 5-14 Pile Parameter for Lateral Pile Response Calculation .................................................... 47
Table 5-15 Allowable Lateral Pile Capacity ...................................................................................... 48
Table 5-5 Requirements for Concrete Exposed To Sulfate-Containing Solutions ............................. 54
Table 5-6 Soil Test Evaluation Reference: ANSI/ AWWA C 105- 72 and 77 .................................... 54
Table 5-7 Corrosion Potential of Top Soil......................................................................................... 56
Table 5-17 Liquefaction Susceptible Area........................................................................................ 59
INDEX OF FIGURES
Figure 1-1 Project Location ................................................................................................................ 9

Figure 2-1 Geotechnical Drilling With Rotary Drilling Rig.................................................................. 15
Figure 2-2 ASTM SPT Sampler........................................................................................................ 16
Figure 2-3 SPT Hammer Types ....................................................................................................... 17
Figure 2-4 UDS Sampler Size .......................................................................................................... 18
Figure 2-5 Standard Begeman Mechanical Cone............................................................................. 19
Figure 3-1 Location of Points ........................................................................................................... 21
Figure 4-1 Geological Map of Project Site (GEOLOGICAL MAP OF THE ALOR AND WEST WETAR
QUADRANGLE, Noya et al, 1997)................................................................................................... 25
Figure 4-2Ss and S1, Maximum Targeted Eartquake (SNI-03-1726-2012) ...................................... 28
Figure 4-3 Ss and S1, Maximum Targeted Eartquake (SNI-03-1726-2012) ..................................... 28
Figure 4-4 Design Response Spectrum According to SNI 1726-2012 .............................................. 29
Figure 4-5 Geotech Cross Section ................................................................................................... 30
Figure 4-6 Nspt to Ø’ correlation (Bowles) ....................................................................................... 31
Figure 5-1 Allowable Capacity vs Depth BH-01................................................................................ 37
Figure 5-2 Allowable Capacity vs Depth BH-02................................................................................ 37
Figure 5-3 Curve Allowable Bearing Capacity vs Depth API Method (tons)...................................... 42
Figure 5-5 Curve Allowable Tension Capacity vs Depth API Method (tons) ..................................... 43
Figure 5-4 Model of Pile as Beam-Column....................................................................................... 45
Figure 5-4 Settlement of BH-01 Pile................................................................................................. 50
Figure 5-4 Settlement of BH-02 Pile................................................................................................. 51
1 Introduction
1.1 General
PT.TRUBA JAYA ENGINEERING hereinafter referred as “Main Consultant”, has requested PT.
TIGENCO GRAHA PERSADA, hereinafter referred to as “Sub Consultant “which works in the line of
Survey and Geotechnical Investigation to perform SOIL INVESTIGATION, SOILRESISTIVITY TEST,
TOPOGRAPHYAND SECONDARY DATA COLLECTION, MOBILE POWER PLANT AND FIXED
GAS ENGINE POWER PLANTPACKAGE II (FIXED POWER PLANT)PLTMG ALOR 10MW. The
client wishes to construct power plant and wants to know the subsurface condition for determination
of foundations.
This investigation includes:

• Mobilization and demobilization of equipment and personel
• Drilling of 2 points
• CPT of 4 points
• Ground water monitoring
• UDS , DS and SPT sampling
• Lab Testing
• Preparation of report
1.2 Project Location
The project is located at Fanating Village, Teluk Mutiara district, Alor Regency, NTT. The topography
of the site is relatively flat, the approximate coordinates are 9088366.604 m N 668515.550m E.
Project Location
Figure 1-1 Project Location
1.3 Performance of Project
The project at this area is started at at 7 March 2018 up to 6 April 2018. The following table shows
the performance dates of the works:
Table 1-1 Performance Dates of Works
DRILLING
Hole Depth
Point ID Date Started Date Completed
(m)
BH-01 40.27 March 26, 2018 April 6, 2018

BH-02 40.37 March 18, 2018 March 24, 2018
CPT
Point ID Hole Depth (m) Date Started
S-01 2 March 7, 2018

S-02 2.6 March 10, 2018
S-03 2 March 9, 2018
S-04 3.4 March 7, 2018
1.4 Objectives
The general purpose of this investigation is to study the sub surface soil condition beneath the
project location and to determine the geotechnical parameters to perform analysis for geotechnical
structures and issues beneath the project site.
1.5 Structure of Report
The report will be divided into a main report of 5 chapters and 10 appendices. The chapters of the
report are:
CHAPTER ONE.Introduction. This chapter will provide background for the project, project location,
performance times, objectives of the project and the structure of the report.
CHAPTER TWO.SCOPE OF WORKS. This chapter will show the scope of works of the contracts
and deviations from the contract, work method, personnel and equipment.
CHAPTER THREE.FIELD INVESTIFATION AND LAB RESULTS. This chapter will provide the
results of the investigation: geotechnical site conditions, geological conditions, results of field testing,
results of lab testing
CHAPTER FOUR .SITE CHARACTERIZATION AND PARAMETERS. This chapter will discuss the
general geotechnical conditions of the site, and by elaborating and examining the results of tests will
show the recommended parameters for geotechnical use.
CHAPTER FIVE.ANALYSIS AND RECCOMENDATION. This chapter will provide the results of
analysis of geotechnical issues that includes: General, Shallow Foundation, Deep Foundation,
Liquefaction, and other relevant items.
2 Scope Of Works
2.1 Scope
The scope of works done agreed on the contract is shown on the table below:
Table 2-1 Actual Scope of Works Done
No DESCRIPTION UNIT Qty
I PREPARATION WORK
1 Mobilization & Demobilization LS 1
II FIELD INVESTIGATION
1 Boring Work
Boring Work @40m Depth points 2
SPT interval 2m nos 40
UDS Samples tubes -
Core Sampling box 16
2 Dutch Cone Penetration Test (DCPT)
Dutch Cone Penetration Test 2.5 Tons points 4
3 Deep Well Investigation
Deep Well Investigation LS -
III LABORATORY TEST

Physical Properties
a. Water Content test -
b. Specific Gravity test -
c. Grain size Analysis test -
d. Plastic Limit and Liquid Limit test -
e. Wet and Dry Density test -
f. Water Sample Test test -
Mechanical Properties
a. Unconfined Compression Test test -
b. Unconsolidated Undrain Tri axial Compression Test test -
c. Consolidation Test test -
No DESCRIPTION UNIT Qty
Calculation
a. Inner Friction Angle set 1
b. Cohesion Value set 1
c. Modulus of Compressibility set 1
d. Shear Strength set 1
e. Soil Bearing Capacity for Shallow Foundation set 1
f. Pile Axial Bearing Capacity set 1
g. Pile Tension Bearing Capacity set 1
h. Pile Lateral Bearing Capacity set 1
IV REPORT
Report incl. Recommendation in English (Hardcopy + Softcopy) copies 3
2.2 Personnel and Equipment

To bring the work to satisfactory completion, the following equipment’s were mobilized to the project
site:
Table 2-2 Equipment Mobilized
Equipment Manufacturer Number Unit Standard Used

GEOTECHNICAL
Drilling Rig TOHO, TONE or 1 rigs Max 100 m Depth
YBM
CPT Rig 2.5 tons Local 1 rigs ASTM D 3441
SPT Hammer & Sampler Local 1 unit ASTM D 1586
Core Barrel Local 1 unit ASTM D 1452
UDS tubes Local 8 nos ASTM D 1587
Lab Equipment
Unit Weight BBS/MBT 1 unit ASTM D 2937
Specific Gravity BBS/MBT 1 unit ASTM D854
Water Content BBS/MBT 1 unit ASTM D2216-71
Equipment Manufacturer Number Unit Standard Used

Grain Size Analysis BBS/MBT 1 unit ASTM D422-72
Atterberg Limits BBS/MBT 1 unit ASTM D4318
Triaxial UU BBS/MBT 1 unit ASTM D 4767-D2850
Unconfined Compression BBS/MBT 1 unit ASTM D 2166
Direct Shear BBS/MBT 1 unit ASTM D3080
Odoemeter BBS/MBT 25 unit ASTM D2435
The following personnel were mobilized:
Table 2-3 Personnel Performed
NO NAME JOB DESC.

Project Manager/ Senior Geotech
1 Andrianto H Nugroho Engineer
2 Rahmad Hidayat, ST. Coordinator
3 Dani ,ST Field Geotech Engineer
4 Wiwit Darayani,ST Office Geotech Engineer
5 Yaqin Driller
6 3 Person Asisten Driller
7 Budi Freadno, ST Lab Officer
8 5 Person Assistant Lab Technician
2.3 Performance
2.3.1 Soil Investigation Works
2.3.1.1 Exploratory Drilling

Access borehole will be sunk for exploratory purpose with insitu tests and undisturbed soil sampling.
The borehole diameter will be sufficiently large to allow the insertion of insitu test apparatus and
undisturbed soil sampler with minimum diameter of 75 mm (NX Size).The drilling will be carried out
by continuous coring. The boring will use pressurized water to loosen the soil for boring. Lithology will
be logged by a competent Geotechnical engineer for the description of soil type, consistency or
compactness, plasticity, colour, degree of cementation if any, and other features that are important
for foundation design.
Borehole will be stable from collapsing. When the borehole reach soil layer with high collapsing
potential, casing pipe will be provided to protect the borehole wall. In any case, the casing pipe
should not be deeper than the borehole and will be at 0.5m above the bottom of the borehole (except
during rock coring)
Figure 2-1 Geotechnical Drilling With Rotary Drilling Rig
2.3.1.2 Standard Penetration Test (SPT)

Standards used : ASTM D 1586-97
Equipment used : free fall manual hammer
Figure 2-2 ASTM SPT Sampler
Standard penetration tests have been done following ASTM D 1586-97.

Test was carried out in each boring hole to obtain a measured of soil resistance to penetration of the
sampler. The purpose of performing this test is to determine relative density of coarse grain soil or
the consistency of fine grain, which reflect the soil supporting capacity. In the test process, a split
barrel sampler is lowered into the bottom of bore hole by drilled rods. The sampler then drives 45 cm
into a soil by 140 lbs free falling hammers over a height of 30 in. The automatic drop hammer device
is used to maintain free falling and constant height. For the test result, the first 15 cm penetration is
not taken in the analysis and considered to be a seating drive. Hence the number of blows to achieve
this 15 cm penetration is not including in the N SPT value. The total cumulative numbers of blow
count required to drive the sampler to the last 30 cm penetration is recorded as the N value. Soil
samples taken from SPT are stored in plastic bag for identification.
The hammer used for SPT testing and sampling is the automatic trip hammer with N70 energy ratio.
AUTOMATIC
TRIP
HAMMER
Figure 2-3 SPT Hammer Types
2.3.1.3 Undisturbed Sampling

Standards used : ASTM D 1587-97.
Sampling interval : according to request
Equipment used : thin wall sampler
In order to obtain undisturbed samples, a clean bore hole has been drilled to the desired sampling
depth. A set of sampler consist of a stainless steel tube attached to the sampler head lowered to the
bottom of the bore hole. The sampler is then pushed into the soil without rotation. After penetrating
into the soil for approximately 95 % of samples length, the thin wall tube is withdrawn from the
borehole. Both end of the tube are then sealed with paraffinwax immediately after the tube is
separated from the sampler head. Samples are then brought to the laboratory for testing.
Figure 2-4 UDS Sampler Size
Outside diameter (Do) = 2”/50.8 mm

Tube Length = 0.5 m
2.3.1.4 Dutch Cone Penetration Test (DCPT/Sondir)

Standards used : ASTM D3441-94, SNI 03-2827-1992
The Cone Penetration Test (CPT), or often referred to as Dutch Cone Test or Sondir in Indonesia, is
used to determine the bearing capacity of the soil layer quickly. The equipment used is the biconus
or the friction-cone. The sounding equipment is pushed into the soil pneumatically. The cone will
determine conus resistance, while the sleeve will determine the friction resistance of the soil.
.
The test will be carried out from ground level. The Begeman type mechanical cone having a friction
jacket was used for the sounding. A pressure gauge was mounted in between the loading frame and
the pushing rod to show the cone resistance and shaft friction. The outer rods were pushed into the
required depth. There are two readings that is registered, cone penetration and total resistance. The
sounding is generally terminated when the maximum thrust capacity of the DCPT is reached.
Figure 2-5 Standard Begeman Mechanical Cone
2.3.1.5 Ground Water Level Observation

Ground water observation is carried out in each bore hole during the drilling works. The ground water
table was determining using Dip meter provided with sound sensors to produce an amplified audio
signal when the probe contacts a water surface. The ground water level is measured during morning
and afternoon
2.3.2 Laboratory Works
The laboratory soil test will be carried out on selected undisturbed sampling following the ASTM
standard, as below:
2.3.2.1 Chemical Laboratory Works

Chemical tests will be given to certified chemical lab in Jakarta. The tests performed are:
Table 2-4 Chemical Tests Done on Ground Water Samples
Paramater Method
pH APHA-4500H+.B(2012)
Sodium-Dissolved (Na) APHA M 3120 B (2012
Pottasium-Dissolved APHA M 3120 B (2012)
Ammonia (N-NH3) APHA-4500NH3-D(2012)
Calcium-Dissolved APHA M 3120 B (2012)
Magnesium-Dissolved (Mg) APHA-3120-B(2012)
Chloride WLN-CL-WI.05 (Spectr
Alkalinity (Bicarbonate) APHA M 2320-B
Alkalinity (Carbonate) APHA M 2320-B
Alkalinity (Hydroxide) APHA M 2320-B
Nitrate (N-NO3) APHA-4500-NO3-E(2012)
Dissociative CO2 APHA M 2320-B
Table 2-5 Chemical Tests Done on Sediment Samples
Paramater Method
Sulphate So4 extraction 1:10 H20
3 Field Investigation and Lab Results
3.1 Site Condition (Location of Points)
Figure 3-1 Location of Points
3.2 Drilling
Drilling was done using continuous coring method. Groundwater levels were monitored during the
drilling. if groundwater level is blank, groundwater is not found during drilling. The following table
shows the coordinates and elevation of points.
Table 3-1 Borehole Coordinates, Ground water and Elevation

Northing Easting
Elev
Point ID Depth (m) GWL
(m) (m) (m)
BH-01 9088368.000 668446.000 4.450 40.27 1.65

BH-02 9088366.604 668515.550 5.514 40.37 1.42
There were no UDS samples taken because of the soil condition; the soil too hard and sandy to
obtain UDS samples.
3.3 CPT Testing
CPT Testing were performed at 6points. CPT testing was performed until a total pressure of 250
kg/cm2 is achieved. The location of the CPT follows the following site map. Ground water level is also
obtained from CPT testing but it is very inaccurate therefore not shown here.
Table 3-2 CPT Results

CPT Refusal Northing Easting Elev
Point ID
(m) (m) (m) (m)
S-01 2 9088365.000 668566.000 6.322
S-02 2.6 9088340.000 668458.000 4.775
S-03 2 9088397.000 668470.000 5.371
S-04 3.4 9088409.000 668548.000 5.348
3.4 Chemical Lab Testing
Chemical Lab Test was performed on selected groundwater and soil samples. The following table
shows the result of the chemical lab testing:
Table 3-3 Water Sample Chemical Results
Result (BH-01)
(1.3 cm depth)
(2 m depth)
(3 m depth)
(4 m depth)
(5 m depth)
No Test Description UoM
Physical Test
1 p-Alkalinity mg/L < 2 < 2 < 2 <1 <1
2 m-Alkalinity mg/L 167 269 367 164.54 337.66
3 Alkalinity hydroxide mg/L < 1 < 1 < 1 <1 <1
4 Acidity mg/L 15 45 62 73.71 28.82
Chemicals-Anion
5 pH n/a 7.46 7.47 7.5 7.03 7.21
6 Chloride mg/L 6 7.6 8.4 10.408 6.019
Nutrients
7 Ammonia (N-NH3) mg/L < 0.02 0.0815 0.0953 < 0.02 < 0.02
8 Nitrate (N-NO3) mg/L 0.002 0.0126 0.0032 0.0354 0.0016
Metals
Calcium-Dissolved
9 mg/L 31.7 46.3 52.2 53.4 54.3
(Ca)
Result (BH-01)
(1.3 cm depth)
(2 m depth)
(3 m depth)
(4 m depth)
(5 m depth)
No Test Description UoM
Magnesium-
10 mg/L 9.18 14 17.4 18.3 19.6
Dissolved (Mg)
Potassium-
11 mg/L 6.5 7.2 7.8 8 8.3
Dissolved (K)
Sodium-Dissolved
12 mg/L 11.7 14 14.8 15.1 16.6
(Na)
Table 3-4 Sediment Sample Chemical Results
Result (BH-01) Result (BH-02)

(5 m depth)
(5 m depth)
Test
depth)
depth)
(2.5 m
(2.5 m
No UoM
Description
1 Sulphate
3.5 Subsurface Soil Stratigraphy
3.5.1 General Stratigraphy
The soil at Alor site is dominated by SAND/SILT/GRAVEL, which are grey and gray, only a very thin
top soil at BH-02. The top soil is around 1 m thick. After that a dense to very dense layer of
SAND/SILT/GRAVELwith 20-50 NSPT value andinsertion of medium SAND in BH-01 at 10-21 m
depth.
3.5.2 Specific Boreholes

Table 3-5 Soil Type at BH-01
Layer
Depth Layer Name Soil Type N-SPT
No
gray, medium, no
1 0-10 GRAVEL/SAND
plasticity, Dense
31 - >50
dark gray, very fine

grain to fine grain, no
2 10-21 SAND
plasticity, weak to dense.
13-26
Rouded, moist
dark gray, very fine

grain to fine grain, no
3 21-end SAND/GRAVEL/SILT
plasticity, weak to dense.
36->50
Rouded to angular, moist
Table 3-6 Soil Type at BH-02
Layer
Depth Layer Name Soil Type N-SPT
No
brown, to dark brown,

1 0-1 SOIL soft, whetering, moist, -
very weak
gray to dark brown,

coarse to very coarse,
medium to hard, non
2 1-end SAND/GRAVEL/SILT 16->50
plasticity, dense to very
dense, round ed to very
angular
3.6 Lab Test Soil
There were no UDS samples taken, therefore no lab testing were performed. There were no UDS
samples taken because of the soil condition; the soil too hard and sandy to obtain UDS samples.
4 Site Characterization And Parameter
4.1 Regional Geology
Project Location
Figure 4-1 Geological Map of Project Site (GEOLOGICAL MAP OF THE ALOR AND WEST WETAR QUADRANGLE,
Noya et al, 1997)
The site sits on Alor Formations (Tmpa).Alor Formation (Tmpa) which are lavas and breccia
intercalated tuf, consists of SAND, SILT, and GRAVEL.
4.2 Seismicity
Various seismic zoning maps of Indonesia have been published by the government and non
government agencies for design purposes. The maps are issued by Water Resurces Research and
Development Center (PUSAIR), Department of Public Works, and SNI-03-1726-2012.
Indonesia is undergoing transition from the seismic code of SNI-03-1726-2002 to SNI-03-1726-2012.

The SNI 2002 is based on UBC97 and has a considered maximum earthquake of 500 years. The
SNI 2012 is based on ASCE7 and has a considered maximum earthquake of 2500 years. The actual
seismic load acting on buildings will be compared considering the parameters of each hole.
4.2.1 Soil Profile for Seismic Purposes
For seismic purposes, both SNI-03-1726-2002 and SNI-03-1726-2012 has classified soil conditions
as 4 types namely Hard Rock (SA), Rock (SB), Hard Soil (SC), Medium Soil (SD), Soft Soil (SE) and
Special Soil (SF). This soil types is calculated from the upper 30 m of the soil stratum.
Table 4-1 Soil Classification According to SNI 1726-2012
Undrained
Shear Wave
SPT Value Shear
Site Class Velocity
N Strength
Vs (m/s)
Su (kPa)
SA (HARD ROCK) >1500 N/A N/A
SB (ROCK) 750 - 1500 N/A N/A
SC (HARD SOIL AND SOFT ROCK) 350 – 750 >50 >100
SD (MEDIUM SOIL) 175 – 350 15 – 50 50 – 100
SE (SOFT SOIL) <175 <15 <50
Table 4-2 Calculation of Seismic Soil Type (BH-01)
Blows Blows Blows Interval

NSPT E/D ƩE/ƩF
Point ID Depth Length 1st 2nd 3rd SPT
A B C D E F G
BH-01 2 0.45 10 15 16 31 2 0.06
BH-01 4 0.45 15 16 18 34 2 0.06
BH-01 6 0.43 22 25 25 50 2 0.04
BH-01 8 0.45 15 22 18 40 2 0.05
BH-01 10 0.45 7 18 22 40 2 0.05
BH-01 12 0.45 11 12 14 26 2 0.08
BH-01 14 0.45 5 6 7 13 2 0.15
BH-01 16 0.45 6 7 10 17 2 0.12
BH-01 18 0.45 8 12 13 25 2 0.08
BH-01 20 0.45 8 11 14 25 2 0.08
BH-01 22 0.45 8 16 20 36 2 0.06
BH-01 24 0.45 16 17 19 36 2 0.06
BH-01 26 0.45 11 16 25 41 2 0.05
BH-01 28 0.45 12 15 19 34 2 0.06
BH-01 30 0.45 12 14 19 33 2 0.06
Total 30 1.051077 28.54215
Table 4-3 Calculation of Seismic Soil Type (BH-02)
Blows Blows Blows Interval

NSPT E/D ƩE/ƩF
Point ID Depth Length 1st 2nd 3rd SPT
A B C D E F G
BH-02 2 0.45 11 12 19 31 2 0.06
BH-02 4 0.45 5 7 9 16 2 0.13
BH-02 6 0.45 8 9 10 19 2 0.11
BH-02 8 0.45 10 13 14 27 2 0.07
BH-02 10 0.45 17 19 21 40 2 0.05
BH-02 12 0.45 10 11 13 24 2 0.08
BH-02 14 0.41 6 27 23 50 2 0.04
BH-02 16 0.45 7 9 11 20 2 0.1
BH-02 18 0.45 18 20 22 42 2 0.05
BH-02 20 0.45 9 12 13 25 2 0.08
BH-02 22 0.45 9 10 11 21 2 0.09
BH-02 24 0.45 10 12 16 28 2 0.07
BH-02 26 0.41 9 25 25 50 2 0.04
BH-02 28 0.45 10 12 14 26 2 0.08
BH-02 30 0.45 6 7 8 15 2 0.13
Total 30 1.186729 25.27957
From the investigation results, the upper 30 m of the site generally has and average NSPT 25-28.
We can assume that the site generally sits on Medium Soil (SD).
4.2.2 Response Spectrum According to SNI-03-1726-2012
To construct the response spectrum for the site we have to find the soil condition and their site
coefficients Ss, S1, Fa and Fv. The site is located on Fanating Village, Teluk Mutiara, Alor, NTTand
this location represented by BH-02 with coordinate X=668515.55Y=9088366.604, the following areas
of coefficients
Variable Nilai
PGA (g) 0.582
SS (g) 1.500
S1 (g) 0.598
CRS 1.154
Variable Nilai
CR1 1.025
FPGA 1.000
FA 1.000
FV 1.500
PSA (g) 0.582
SMS (g) 1.500
SM1 (g) 0.897
SDS (g) 1.000
SD1 (g) 0.598
T0 (detik) 0.120
TS (detik) 0.598
Figure 4-2Ss and S1, Maximum Targeted Eartquake (SNI-03-1726-2012)
Figure 4-3 Ss and S1, Maximum Targeted Eartquake (SNI-03-1726-2012)
The site coefficients may the be determined from the following table:
Table 4-4 Site Coefficient Fa

Table 4-5 Site Coefficient Fv
The design response spectrum is shown on the following figure.
Figure 4-4 Design Response Spectrum According to SNI 1726-2012

4.3 Subsurface Characterization
SAND/SILT/GRAVEL with 20-50 NSPT value and insertion of medium SAND in BH-01 at 10-21 m
depth.
Figure 4-5 Geotech Cross Section
4.4 Recommended Design Parameter
This section recommends the parameter to be used for design. The input data is borehole log, lab
tests, spt logs, and judgement.
The parameters will be recommended by each borehole and a general one which is a summary of
the individual boreholes.
These parameters were derived from experience and judgment of the geotech engineer assigned to
this project and a list of equation and correlation used is shown below.
1. SPT to Su Correlation, (Stroud, 1974) Cu/N = 4.5 if IP>40%, 5 if IP<40%

2. SPT to Ø’ Correlation, (Bowles)
Figure 4-6 Nspt to Ø’ correlation (Bowles)
3. Modulus of Elasticity from SPT,CPT,Su, (Bowles, 97)

a. 8000 ; in kg/cm2, in kPa for sands
b. 7000√ ; in blows, in kPa for sands

c. 100 ; in kg/cm2, in kg/cm2 for clays
4. Consolidation Parameters (if unknown)
Us Navy, 1974
Brooker and Ireland, 1965

4.4.1 Detailed Borehole Parameters
Table 4-6 Recommended Parameters for Design for BH-01
Friction Angle
Soil Modulus
Unit Weight (gr/cm3)
Undrained
Shear Str.
Effective
NSPT VALUE
Layer No Depth Layer Name
Su (kPa)
E (Mpa)
Ø'
1 0-10 GRAVEL/SAND 40 20.00 41.83 44.27
2 10-21 SAND 19 18.00 33.49 30.51
3 21-end SAND/GRAVEL/SILT 42 19.50 42.50 45.37
Table 4-7 Recommended Parameters for Design for BH-02

Friction Angle
Soil Modulus
Undrained
Unit Weight (gr/cm3)
Shear Str.
Effective
NSPT VALUE
Layer No Depth Layer Name

Su (kPa)
E (Mpa)
Ø'
1 0-1 SOIL 0 18.50 22.50 2.25
2 1-end SAND/GRAVEL/SILT 34 19.00 39.74 40.82

5 Analysis and Recommendation
5.1 General Recommendations
SAND/SILT/GRAVEL with 20-50 NSPT value and insertion of medium SAND in BH-01 at 10-21 m
depth.
Shallow foundation may be feasible for light to medium structures. But heavy or important structures
may still use shallow piles. Around 27 – 32 m the piles will have a stable layer to sit on.
There are some liquifiable soil due to geological conditions and high earthquake potential, general
recommendation may be used:
1. Use piles on medium – heavy buildings to bypass the sand layer
2. Use slab-beam on ground floor of light buildings to prevent damage by differential settlement
3. Remove the soil strength of liquifiable soil during calculation of pile bearing capacity
5.2 Analysis Methods

The analysis methods used in the following chapters will be explained briefly here. The following
table shows a quick glance of the calculations done and their respective methods:
Table 5-1 Brief of Calculation Methods

Item Calculation Method
Bearing Capacity of Meyerhoff
Shallow Foundation
Ultimate Axial Capacity of API Method
Deep Foundation
5.3 Earthworks (Excavation)
Earthworks done on the project will mainly be pile cap excavations and backfill. As have described
above, the top soil of the whole project is cohesive soil which is not in very bad condition. Therefore
these recommendations may be applied:
1. Stripping and cutting is required to remove topsoil, organic and deletrious material. These
materials may reduce the strength of bond between fill layer and structure. After removal of
the topsoil, the soil will not have erosion protection so the soil must be protected as not to be
soggy or eroded.
2. Excavations may be done in vertical for excavations not more than 1.5 m, while deper
excavations can be done with 45 degree angle and a berm (terracering) every 3 m of height.
3. It is recommended that structural fills be constructed as controlled, well-compacted
engineered fills. Existing soils from cut area are suitable for reuse as fill in low laying areas.
Laboratory testing should be performed on the fill material to determine the appropriate
moisture – density relationship of the fill being placed. Adjustments to the soil moisture by
wetting or drying should be made as needed during fill placement
4. There are several soils on site that may not be suitable for fill. Soils over 95% liquid limit or
over 65% plasticity index must be removed and not used for fill.
5. Erosion control is important as the site is mainly residual soil which is very sensitive to
changes in weather and moisture.
6. Sufficient drainage and protection must be made on the slope such as vertical perpendicular
drains and catchers
7. Do not make drainage on top of slopes as damaged drains may saturate the slope and
reduce strength
5.4 Shallow Foundation

To have a good performance, foundation of any structure must satisfy two independent design
criteria.
 It must an acceptable factor of safety against bearing type failure under a maximum design
load
 Settlements during the structure lifetime must not be a magnitude that will cause structural
damage, or impair the operational efficiency of the facility.
Selection of the foundation type to satisfy the criteria depends on the nature and magnitude of dead
and live loads, the base areas of the structure and the settlement tolerance. Where more than one
foundation type satisfies these criteria, the cost, scheduling, material availability and local practice
will influence the final selection of the type of foundation.
As have been described on the previous chapters, the top soil is cohesive soil which is not very bad
but not stiff enough. Shallow foundation may be used but may not be sufficient for the loads required.
Nevertheless we calculate shallow foundation bearing and settlement.
5.4.1 Bearing Capacity
Bearing capacity of foundations will use the Meyerhoff method from NSPT corelation with bearing
capacity equations of:
Parameters for bearing capacity of shallow foundations is taken from the previous chapter for each
layer. A factor of safety of 3 is recommended for bearing capacity of shallow foundation.
These foundations will be checked for each borehole up to 10 m depth. The results are then
tabulated on graphs that is shown on the appendix.
The following figure shows the bearing capacity of shallow foundations on 1 m, 2m and 3 m depth
and 1x1, 2x2 and 3x3 m2 dimension.
Figure 5-1 Allowable Capacity vs Depth BH-01
Figure 5-2 Allowable Capacity vs Depth BH-02
The following is a sample calculation to obtain allowable bearing capacity using the Meyerhoff SPT
correlation method:
Borehole BH-01
Footing Dimensions:
Depth (D) :1m
Width (B) :1m
Average nSPT : 32
F1 : 0.04
F2 : 0.06
F3 : 0.3
F4 : 1.2
Kd : 1+ 0.33 x D/B : 1.330
qa : 32/0.06 x ((1 + 0.3)/1)^2 x 1.330

qa : 120tons/m2
5.4.2 Uplift Capacity
The uplift capacity may be determined by the weight of the foundation plus the weight of the soil
above the foundation. A factor of safety of 2 is recommended for uplift capacity of shallow foundation.
For site purposes the unit weight of the soil considered is 17.0 kN/m3.
5.5 Deep Foundation
5.5.1 Static Axial Compression and Tension Capacity
5.5.1.1 Spun Pile

Driven precast concrete spun pile is going to be used in case piled foundation is required. The report
analyzes 400 diameter precast piles. Driven pile is easy to install and can transfer working load to a
competent layer at deeper stratum, by by-passing the top medium stiff to stiff layer, resulting in very
small experienced settlement.
The ultimate soil bearing capacity in compression and tension of driven pile is calculated using API
RPA-WSD (2000) method based on the laboratory and field tests, by using the following formula :
. .
Where:
Pult-comp = ultimate pile capacity in compression, kN
fs = unit skin friction to pile, kN/m2
= α.cu for cohesive soil
=ko.po.tan(ɸ), for cohesion less soil
α =adhesion factor
=0.50. -0.50for 1.0, according to API RP2A-WSD
ko = coefficient of lateral earth pressure

=1-sinɸ
cu =undrained shear strength, kN/m2
po = effective overburden vertical stress at depth under consideration, kN/m2
As = outside surface area of pile, m2
qp = unit end bearing capacity, kN/m2
=9. cu, for cohesive soil
=po.Nq, for cohesion less soil
Nq =dimensionless bearing capacity factor
Ap =cross section area of pile, m2
Skin friction and unit end bearing cannot be continuously increase as overburden increase. Limiting
values are set forth by API RPA-WSD in the following table:
Table 5-2 Limiting Values of Pile Bearing Capacity (API RP2 WSD)
Limiting values for unit end bearing and skin friction will be extrapolated from the table. The limiting
end bearing values is linear and can be limited as 240 Nq.
The API method is essentially α and β method and can be used for offshore and onshore pile
capacity. The method also has limiting values for bearing capacity so the results will be conservative.
To aid the designer in designing a foundation, the graphs of pile depth vs allowable capacity for each
borehole point are provided in APPENDIX F Pile Bearing Capacity. The designer can select which
area point close to a particular structure so pile capacity can be obtained from the graph represented
by at borehole.
Tension capacity can be determined by multiplying the skin friction of the capacity with a factor of
0.65.
5.5.2 Allowable Capacity
5.5.2.1 Axial Compressive Capacity

To determine the allowable axial pile capacity in compression the equation should be used.

Where :
Pall-comp = allowable soil bearing capacity in compression, kN
Pull-comp =ultimate pile capacity, kN
Fsp =factor of safety end bearing,3
Fss =factor of safety skin friction,3
Refer to appendix for capacity of pile foundation.
On the issue of negative skin friction, the axial compressive capacity must be deducted with negative
skin friction of the upper part of the soil. But from the settlement calculation the settlement of the fill
most likely will only create a minimum amount of negative skin friction that is negligible.
5.5.2.2 Axial Tension Capacity

To determine the allowable axial pile capacity in compression the equation should be used.

Where :
Pall-tension = allowable soil bearing capacity in tension, kN
Pult-tension =ultimate pile capacity in tension, kN
Fs =factor of safety,3
Finally, the maximum allowable load both in compression and tension should be checked against the
allowable capacity of the pile material
5.5.3 Recommended Piling Depth
The following table shows the recommended piling depth and the allowable axial bearing capacity of
piles. The piling depth is recommended based on pile size, bearing layer location, presence of soft
intercalation, length of piling and bearing capacity calculation. These are recommendations based on
drivability primarily and must be recalculated.
Table 5-3 Recommended Piling Depth and Capacity of Spun Pile
API Method Dia. 400

Allowable
Recommended
Borehole Bearing
Piling Depth
Capacity
(m) (ton)
BH-01 27 144
BH-02 32 129
Figure 5-3 Curve Allowable Bearing Capacity vs Depth API Method (tons)
Figure 5-4 Curve Allowable Tension Capacity vs Depth API Method (tons)
The following is a sample calculation of pile bearing capacity calculation:
PT. TIGENCO GRAHA PERSADA PILE DIA. 0.4 m

SPUN PILE CAPACITY PILE AREA 0.126 m2 BH-01
METHOD: API RP2A-WSD PILE SKIN 1.257 m2/m
PROJECT SOIL INVESTIGATION PLTMG ALOR10
GWL MW 1.65 m SAFETY FACTOR TIP 3 MADE WIWIT
LOCATION DESA FANATING, TELUK MUTIARA, ALOR, NTT SAFETY FACTOR SKIN 3 CHECK AHN
Length of NSP Pile Tip Friction Allowable Bearing Allowable
SOIL*
σO'
Tension
Pile Cu φ ϒ ϒ' α ko Nq fs (kPa) qp Resist. Resist. Capacity Capacity
T
(m) Ppu (kN) Pf (kN) Pu (kN) Pu (ton) Pu (ton)
0.0 40 S 0.0 41.8 20.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.33 83.3 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0.5 40 S 0.0 41.8 20.0 20.0 10.0 0.0 0.33 83.3 3.0 833 105 2 36 4 0
1.0 40 S 0.0 41.8 20.0 20.0 20.0 0.0 0.33 83.3 6.0 1666 209 6 72 7 0
1.5 40 S 0.0 41.8 20.0 20.0 30.0 0.0 0.33 83.3 8.9 2498 314 11 108 11 0
2.0 40 S 0.0 41.8 20.0 10.2 35.1 0.0 0.33 83.3 10.5 2923 367 18 128 13 0
2.5 40 S 0.0 41.8 20.0 10.2 40.2 0.0 0.33 83.3 12.0 3348 421 25 149 15 1
3.0 40 S 0.0 41.8 20.0 10.2 45.3 0.0 0.33 83.3 13.5 3773 474 34 169 17 1
3.5 40 S 0.0 41.8 20.0 10.2 50.4 0.0 0.33 83.3 15.0 4197 527 43 190 19 1
4.0 40 S 0.0 41.8 20.0 10.2 55.5 0.0 0.33 83.3 16.5 4622 581 54 212 22 1
4.5 40 S 0.0 41.8 20.0 10.2 60.6 0.0 0.33 83.3 18.1 5047 634 65 233 24 2
5.0 40 S 0.0 41.8 20.0 10.2 65.7 0.0 0.33 83.3 19.6 5472 688 77 255 26 2
Location : BH-01
Depth :5m
Soil : SAND
NSPT : 40
Φ : 41.8
GWL : 1.65 m
 : 20 kN/m3
’ : 20 – (5 – 1.65)*10 kN/m3
: 10.2 kN/m3
Po : 1.65 * 20 + (5-1.65) * 10.2
: 65.7 kPa
Ko : 1-sin Φ
: 0.33
Nq : 83.3 see API table
fs (4.5-5.0 m) : ko . po . tanΦ-- sample
: 0.33 x 65.7 x tan 41.8
: 19.6 kPa
qp : po x Nq
: 65.7 x 83.3
: 5472 kPa
Pile Tip resist. : qp x Ap
: 5427 x 0.126
: 688 kN
Pile skin resist : cummulative : 77 kN
5.5.4 Lateral Response
Lateral bearing capacity will be determined by allowable movements and pile maximum yield
moment therefore it may be needed to construct a lateral load – moment – deflection diagram. The
calculations below use the p-y method for the soil parameter and finite difference to find the reactions
of the pile-soil. The method used is the method developed by Lymon C. Reese; Larry A. Cooley and
N. Radhakrishnan U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Technical Report K-84-2. This method is an
adaptation of the COM624 computer program. Recommendations and work method is provided from
FHWA NHI-10 Drilled Shafts.
The pile is treated as a beam-column with lateral soil support. The general behavior of the drilled
shaft under a combination of lateral and axial loading can be obtained by solving the following
differential equation (Hetenyi, 1946):
Figure 5-5 Model of Pile as Beam-Column
The soil resistance, p, in the firs equation is considered to be a function of the deflection, y, and thus
is a differential equation in terms of a single variable. The nonlinear relationship between the soil
resistance, p, and the deflection, y, is the p-y curve used to model the soil. In order to model a
nonlinear p-y curve, an equivalent linear secant modulus is assumed and the numerical solution
obtained by successive approximation and iteration until convergence as described below. The slope
of a secant to any p-y curve is defined as follows:
Px Axial load on the pile

y Lateral deflection of the pile at a point x along the length of the pile
p Lateral soil reaction per unit length
EI Flexural stiffness of pile
w Distributed load along the length of the pile
V Shear on the pile
M Bending moment on the pile
S Slope of the deflection diagram of pile
Es Soil Modulus
The equation are then subtitled and the program will input boundary conditions therefore the
equation can be solved using integration. Selection of the p-y curve is based on soil type as the
following:
No Type Graph
1 Cohesive Soil
2 Stiff Clay
No Type Graph
3 Cohesion less Soil
In this report Esi = EPS50, k = ki. Pu is related to undrained shear strength and angle of friction.
During design phase the lateral pile capacity presented in this report should be checked against the
capacity of pile material to resist bending moment and shear stress. This can be done by checking
the interaction graph of axial load versus bending moment issued by the pile manufacturer.
Pile parameters that will be used for the calculations may be examined on the following table:
Table 5-4 Pile Parameter for Lateral Pile Response Calculation

Cracking
Hollow Moment of Moment
Diameter Thickness fc' E EI
Pile Type Diameter Inertia (JIS A
5335)
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm4) (MPa) (kpa) (kNm2) (kNm)
Concrete
400 250 75 1064889463 49 32900000 35034.9 55
Spun Pile
I Moment of Inertia of Pile (1/64 x ( Diameter4 – Thickness4))

E Modulus of elasticity of concrete (4700 ′)
fc' Concrete compressive strength
Soil parameters will use the soil parameters stated on the previous chapter at Error! Reference
source not found.Error! Reference source not found.. The calculation will check lateral response
of pile at free head or fixed head. The client has specified that lateral capacity be checked 15 mm
maximum pile deflection. Therefore, the allowable pile capacity will be determined by checking lateral
capacity at and taking the smallest value:
1. 15 mm max deflection free head
2. Crack moment free head
3. Crack moment fixed head
The deflection at fixed head is not checked because from our calculations the pile will crack first
before reaching maximum deflection. The following tables summarizes the lateral capacity of each
pile at each area. Length of Pile is per recommended length.
Table 5-5 Allowable Lateral Pile Capacity
Lateral Capacity for Pile dia. 400

(tons)
For Delection max
For Delection Max
Crack Moment
Crack Moment
Area
Fixed Head
10 mm
15 mm
Free
BH-01 10 13 7 5
BH-02 6 8 6 4
5.5.5 Pile Spacing
5.5.5.1 Axial Group Effects

Piles in groups should not be installed at center to center spacing less than 3 times the average pile
diameter unless dictated otherwise by pile size, site constraints, pile cap requirements, and
construction costs. The minimum center to center spacing of 3 diameters is recommended to
optimize nominal group resistance and to minimize pile installation problems associated with a center
to center pile spacing of 2.5 diameters (FHWA-NHI-16-009 2016).
5.5.5.2 Lateral Group Effects

For lateral loading, analyses based on (Fleming,2008) show that no reduction in lateral capacity due
to pile group effects is envisaged provided the pile spacing is 4.5 pile diameter or greater (center to
center). In case pile spacing is less than 4.5 pile diameter in a group, we recommend reduction factor
of 0.70 to analyze the lateral group capacity.
5.5.6 Pile Settlement
Pile settlement will be calculated using the Vesic Method (1977) for soil resting on sand. The
following formula will be used:
Where:
S = Total Elastic Settlement (m)
Ss = Axial Deformation of Single Pile (m)
Sp = Pile Tip Settlement (m)
Sps = Settlment because of distributed load along pile length (m)
Qp = Load to Pile Tip (tons)
Qs = Load to Pile Skin (tons)
L = Pile Length (m)
Ap = Pile Section (m2)
Ep = Pile Modulus of Elasticity (ton/m2)
α = Vesic Coefficient (distribution of skin friction) taken as 0.5 for parabolic
Cp = Empirical Coefficient (taken as 0.03 for dense sand, piled foundation) (Vesic,1977)
D = Pile Diameter (m)
qp = Pile unit tip bearing capacity
p = Pile circumeference
Es = Modulus Elasticity of Sol
νs = Soil Poisson Ration (Taken 0.3 for Sand)
Iws = Ifluence factor = 2 + 0.35 x Sqrt(L/D)
The following table shows the pile deformations in mm:

Figure 5-6 Settlement of BH-01 Pile

Figure 5-7 Settlement of BH-02 Pile

From the calculation above we can see that the pile settlement range from 30 – 50 mm. Most of the
pile settlement come from pile elastic deformation and only around 10 mm come from soil
deformation.
The following is a sample calculation to obtain pile settlement using the Vesic method:
5.5.7 Pile Driving
5.5.7.1 Driving Records

Probe piles should be installed first before any production pile. Observation on probe pile should be
performed at every area near the boring points to know the sufficient length of embedment, final
blows per 25 cm penetration, and total blows of each probe pile.
After driving the probe piles pile load tests on several piles at represented area should be carried out
to know pile behavior under loading and pile load capacity at certain short-term settlement.
Driving of working piles area performed after issuing pile driving criteria for piles at each represented
area. The following data shall be recorded in the pile driving record sheet.
1. General data including project name, job number, pile driving record, date and time of pile
driving commencement and completion , pile number, scructure name, ground surface
elevation and other.
2. Data of pile including pile identification number, pile diameter, pile length, pile tip elevation,
and others.
3. Data of hammers including total weigth of hammers ram weight, ram stroke, rate energy per
blow, hammer cushion.
We recommend that pile driving be performed from center to edge of the group to avoid or to limits
possible heaving. A continuous heave measurement for all the piles should be performed throughtout
the pile driving. Re-driving of piles should be done if heave exceeds 25.4 mm.
We recommend using pile shoes to improve drive-ability and also to provide protection at the pile tip.
5.5.7.2 Pile Driving Criteria

The pile driving acceptance criteria shoud be based on the following :
1. Drive the pile to target level as defined by the nearest boring logs or pile test result.
2. If the pile comes to refusal above target level, continue driving until a blow count of 100
blows/250 mm penetration or final set of 25 mm/10 blows. The pile is than required to be
driven for “final setting” in 2 times, without any reduction in the driving resistance. If the
resistance is not maintained at 25 mm/10 blows it is judged that the hard layer is thin and the
pile is liable to break through this layer. Therefore, the pile should be driven further to the
target level.
5.5.8 Cement Type Selection
Sulfate can be harmful on concrete and can cause solution of the concrete body and finally corrosion
to the rebar. To prevent this, concrete can be made with sulfate resisting cement or other additives.
To determine whether soil or water is harmful for concrete ACI 318 has given the following
guidelines:
Table 5-6 Requirements for Concrete Exposed To Sulfate-Containing Solutions
Result of chemical testing shows that Sulphate in soil varies from 87 to 342 ppm therefore the
Sulphate exposure is negligible and there is no special cement type specified for the site.
5.5.9 Corrosion
The primary concern for performing resistivity tests and chemical testing of soil is to provide data to
determine whether the soil is very corrosive or has a negligible corrosion rate. The test results are
also to be used to determine the protection type of the piles or other embedded structures.
There are many kind of factor that influence the corrosion in soil such as soil texture, moisture
content, resistivity, soluble ion content, pH, oxidation-reduction potential and the role of microbes.
The soil test evaluation refers to ANSI A: 21.5/ AWWA C: 105-77 with criteria of scoring as follows:
Table 5-7 Soil Test Evaluation Reference: ANSI/ AWWA C 105- 72 and 77
Soil Characteristics Points

Less than 700 10
Soil 700 – 1,000 8
Resistivity 1,000 – 1,200 5
1,200 – 1,500 2
(Ohm cm) 1,500 – 2,000 1
More Than 2,000 0
pH Less Than 2 5
Soil Characteristics Points

2–4 3
4 – 6.5 0
6.5 – 7.5 0*
7.5 – 8.5 0
More Than 8.5 3
Moisture Poor drainage, 2
continuously
Fair drainage,wet
generally 1
Content
Good
moist drainage, generally 0
Sulfides dry
Positive 3.5
Trace 2
(ppm)
Negative 0
Moisture content point is based on the following criteria:
• Poor drainage : Clay, silty clay, moisture content >50%
• Fair drainage : Silty sand, Silty clay, moisture content: 25 – 50%
• Good drainage : Sand, gravel, moisture content < 25%
Sulfide content point is based on the following criteria:
• Sulfides positive: > 1500 ppm (mg/kg)
• Sulfides trace: 120 – 1500 ppm (mg/kg)
• Sulfide negative: < 120 ppm (mg/kg)
Severity is based on the following criteria:
• Total Points <= 5 Negligible
• Total Points 6-10 Slight
• Total Points 11-15 Moderate
• Total Points 16-20 Severe
• Total Points >20 Very Severe
Encasement is needed when the following criteria are achieved:
• Soil resistivity point <1000 ohm cm, and/or
• Total point reaches 19

To calculate the corrosion severity of the top soil to embedded piles, pipes and other structures, the
ANSI method is used. Data were taken from chemical lab tests, field resistivity results and soil lab
tests. The following table shows the calculation of the corrosion potential of the top soil in each
borehole. (Several assumptions must be made and resistivity results will be interpolated to nearest
test).
Table 5-8 Corrosion Potential of Top Soil
Corresponding Soil Resistivity ph moisture Sulfides Total

Borehole
Resistivity Test (Ohm.cm) score value score score ppm score score
BH-01 1, 2, 4 6120-212766 0 7 0 0 87 0 0
BH-02 4, 5 2639-212766 0 7 0 0 342 2 2
The site has negligible corrosion and encasement of piles is not required
5.5.10 Liquifection
Liquefaction analysis will be performed using the Youd et Idriss consensus method. The seismic data
required is the peak horizontal acceleration at ground surface or a max. This can be obtained quickly
from the standard used or from specifications. For this area the peak surface acceleration (PSA) is
0.504 g.
5.5.10.1 Youd et All Method
The Youd et All Method (2001) compares the Cyclic Stress Ratio (CSR) and Cyclic Resistance Ratio
(CRR) which are the seismic demand and geotechnical resistance of the soil respectively. The CSR
can be calculated using the following equation:
Where
amax = peak horizontal acceleration at ground surface
g = acceleration of gravity
= total and effective overburden stress
rd = stress reduction coefficient, defined as:
Z = depth beneath ground surface (m)
While the CRR can be calculated using the following equation if using the SPT value:
(N1)60CS = corrected NSPT values to 60 energy ration and corrected for fines content, defined
as:
FC = fines content
NSPT corrections used are:

The project uses automatic trip donut hammer, the energy ratio correction Ce = 1.0 The samplers
used are without liners therefore Cs = 1.2. The borehole diameter is around 75 mm therefore Cb =
1.0. The rod length and overburden pressure is calculated.
Therefore the (N1)60 for the project can be defined as: (N1)60= N x 1.2 x Cn x Cr
The safety factor against liquefaction can be determined by:
Where:
MSF = Magnitude Scaling Factor, because CRR and CSR equations were developed at an
earthquake magnitude of 7.5 if other magnitude earthquakes are used a scaling factor
must be used. Regular practice in Indonesia uses MSF = 1.0
Kσ = Correction for depth of layer, usually neglected as only shallow depths are
assessed
Kα = Correction for slopes, neglected as assumed in level soil.
Notes : as liquefaction will not happen without ground water then soil above groundwater will
automatically assumed to be SF = 2. The same thing is done on high fines soil.
Calculations may be examined in APPENDIX J. The following table shows the calculation for
liquifection susceptability:
Table 5-9 Liquefaction Susceptible Area
Safety
Factor
Area Depth (m) Soil Type NSPT Value Against
Liquefaction
(Youd)
BH-01 12-20 fine SAND 14 - 29 0.28 – 0.74
BH-02 4–6 Gravelly SAND 16 – 19 0.16 – 0.30
From the liquifection assessment, there are 2 locations that have a potential for liquifection to occur.
For BH-01 the liquifection occurs at a deeper depth, therefore will have little impact on the settlement
of shallow foundations, however for pile foundations, for eartquake loading we suggest to remove the
soil strength of 12 – 20 m from pile bearing calculations.
For BH-02 the liquifection occurs at a shallow depth. We recommend to use pile foundation for
medium-heavy buildings as to provide stable platform during liquifection. For light buildings we
suggest to use slab-beam for ground floor to provide resistance from differential settlement which
may occur during liquifection.
BORING NUMBER BH-01
PAGE 1 OF 2
Tigenco Graha Persada NORTHING 9088368 m

EASTING 668446 m
ELEVATION + 4.45 m
PROJECT SOIL INVESTIGATION PLTMG ALOR 10 MW
GROUND WATER LEVELS, AVERAGE: 1.65
LOCATION DESA FANATING, TELUK MUTIARA, ALOR, NTT
DATE START END DATE START END DATE START END
CLIENT PT. TRUBA JAYA ENGINEERING
26/03/2018 1.25 m 0.75 m 01/04/2018 2.25 m 1.75 m 02/04/2018 1.75 m 2.35 m
DATE STARTED 26/3/18 COMPLETED 6/4/18 03/04/2018 1.80 m 2.39 m 04/04/2018 1.02 m 2.20 m 05/04/2018 1.30 m 2.37 m
DRILLER Sayid Ainul Yaqin 06/04/2018 0.70 m 1.22 m
DRILLING METHOD Continuous Boring

LOGGED BY Rahmad Hidayat CHECKED BY Andrianto HN
REMARKS
FINES CONTENT (%)
POCKET PENETROMETER
SAMPLE TYPE
SAMPLE (m)
20 40 60 80
DEPTH OF
(N VALUE)
GRAPHIC
NUMBER
COUNTS
CORE
PHOTO
DEPTH
(kg/cm^2)
BLOW
CORE
RQD PL MC LL
LOG
(m)
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION RECOVERY

(%)
(%) 20 40 60 80
SPT N VALUE
20 40 60 80 20 40 60 80
10 20 30 40 50
GRAVEL, couble to Boulder, gray,
medium, no plasticity, Dense
1
2
2.00 SPT 10-15-16 31
2.45 1 (31)
3
4
SAND to GRAVEL,gray to dark 4.00 SPT 15-16-18 34
brown, coarse to very coarse, 4.45 2 (34)
5 medium, no plasticity, dense.
Rounded to anggular
6
6.00 SPT 22-25- >>
6.43 3 25/13
7
SAND, dark gray, fine grain to

8 medium fine grain, no plasticity,
weak to dense, moist. 8.00 SPT 15-22-18 40
GRAVEL, couble to Boulder, gray, 8.45 4 (40)
9 medium, no plasticity, Dense
SAND, dark gray, medium fine
grain to coarse, no plasticity, weak
10 to dense. Subrouded to anggular
10.00 SPT 7-18-22 40
GRAVEL, couble to Boulder, gray, 5 (40)
medium, no plasticity, very Dense 10.45
11
GEOTECH BH PLOTS-MIE ALOR-TRUBA.GPJ GINT STD A4 ASTM LAB.GDT 11/4/18
12
SAND, dark gray, very fine grain to 12.00 SPT 11-12-14 26
fine grain, no plasticity, weak to 6 (26)
dense. Rouded, moist 12.45
13
14
14.00 SPT 5-6-7 13
14.45 7 (13)
15
16
16.00 SPT 6-7-10 17
16.45 8 (17)
17
18
18.00 SPT 8-12-13 25
18.45 9 (25)
19
20
(Continued Next Page)
BORING NUMBER BH-01
PAGE 2 OF 2
Tigenco Graha Persada NORTHING 9088368 m

EASTING 668446 m
ELEVATION + 4.45 m
FINES CONTENT (%)
POCKET PENETROMETER
SAMPLE TYPE
SAMPLE (m)
20 40 60 80
DEPTH OF
(N VALUE)
GRAPHIC
NUMBER
COUNTS
CORE
PHOTO
DEPTH
(kg/cm^2)
BLOW
CORE
RQD PL MC LL
LOG
(m)

(%)
(%) 20 40 60 80
SPT N VALUE
20 40 60 80 20 40 60 80
10 20 30 40 50
SAND, dark gray, very fine grain to 20.00 SPT 8-11-14 25
fine grain, no plasticity, weak to 20.45 10 (25)
21 dense. Rouded, moist
22
22.00 SPT 8-16-20 36
22.45 11 (36)
23
24
24.00 SPT 16-17-19 36
24.45 12 (36)
25
26
26.00 SPT 11-16-25 41
26.45 13 (41)
27
28 SAND, dark gray, medium grain to

coarse grain, no plasticity, weak to 28.00 SPT 12-15-19 34
dense. Subrounded to anggular. 28.45 14 (34)
29
30 SILT, dark grey, medium plastiity,

30.00 SPT 12-14-19 33
medium hard, firm, moist.
30.45 15 (33)
31
32
SAND, dark gray, medium grain to 32.00 SPT 14-18-20 38
coarse grain, no plasticity, Dense to 32.45 16 (38)
33 very dense. Subrounded to
anggular.
34
34.00 SPT 15-16-21 37
34.45 17 (37)
35
SAND to GRAVEL, gray to dark
brown, coarse to very coarse,
36 medium, no lasticity, dense. Sub
Rounded to anggular 36.00 SPT 18-21-25 46
36.45 18 (46)
37
38
SAND, dark gray, medium grain to 38.00 SPT 14-32-18/6 >>
coarse grain, no plasticity, Dense to 38.36 19
39 very dense. Subrounded to
anggular.
40
40.00 SPT 15-50/13 >>
Bottom of borehole at 40.27 40.28 20
meters.
BORING NUMBER BH-02
PAGE 1 OF 2
Tigenco Graha Persada NORTHING 9088366.604 m

EASTING 668515.55 m
ELEVATION + 5.514 m
DATE START END DATE START END DATE START END
18/03/2018 N/A. m 0.60 m 19/03/2018 0.70 m 2.36 m 20/03/2018 0.70 m 1.40 m
DATE STARTED 18/3/18 COMPLETED 24/3/18 22/03/2018 1.20 m 2.75 m 23/03/2018 1.20 m 2.25 m 24/03/2018 0.70 m 1.80 m
DRILLER Sayid Ainul Yaqin

DRILLING METHOD Continuous Boring
LOGGED BY Rahmad Hidayat CHECKED BY Andrianto HN
REMARKS
FINES CONTENT (%)
POCKET PENETROMETER
SAMPLE TYPE
SAMPLE (m)
20 40 60 80
DEPTH OF
(N VALUE)
GRAPHIC
NUMBER
COUNTS
CORE
PHOTO
DEPTH
(kg/cm^2)
BLOW
CORE
RQD PL MC LL
LOG
(m)

(%)
(%) 20 40 60 80
SPT N VALUE
20 40 60 80 20 40 60 80
10 20 30 40 50
SOIL, brown, to dark brown, soft,
whetering, moist, very weak.
1
SAND to gravel, gray, to dark
2 medium, non plasticity, dense,
rounded to very angular. 2.00 SPT 11-12-19 31
2.45 1 (31)
3
4
4.00 SPT 5-7-9 16
4.45 2 (16)
5 SAND to gravel, medium fine grain
to coarse, non plasticity, dense,
rounded to angular.
6
SAND to gravel, gray, to dark 6.00 SPT 8-9-10 19
brown, coarse to very coarse, 6.45 3 (19)
7 medium, non plasticity, dense,
rounded to angular.
8
8.00 SPT 10-13-14 27
8.45 4 (27)
9
SAND, dark gray, fine to medium
10 fine grain, non plasticity, weak to
dense, moist. 10.00 SPT 17-19-21 40
SAND to gravel, gray to dark 10.45 5 (40)
11 brown, coarse to very coarse,
medium, non plasticity, dense,
rounded to angular.
12
12.00 SPT 10-11-13 24
12.45 6 (24)
13
SAND, dark gray, fine to medium
14 fine grain, non plasticity, firm to
dense, moist. 14.00 SPT 6-27-23/11 >>
SAND to gravel, coarse to very 14.41 7
15 coarse, medium, non plasticity,
dense to very dense, rounded to
angular.
16
16.00 SPT 7-9-11 20
16.45 8 (20)
17
SAND, dark gray, fine grain to
medium fine grain, non plasticity,
18 firm to dense, moist.
SAND to gravel, coarse to very 18.00 SPT 18-20-22 42
coarse, medium, non plasticity, 18.45 9 (42)
19 dense , rounded to angular.
20 SILT, dark grey, medium plasticity,

(Continued Next Page)
BORING NUMBER BH-02
PAGE 2 OF 2
Tigenco Graha Persada NORTHING 9088366.604 m

EASTING 668515.55 m
ELEVATION + 5.514 m
FINES CONTENT (%)
POCKET PENETROMETER
SAMPLE TYPE
SAMPLE (m)
20 40 60 80
DEPTH OF
(N VALUE)
GRAPHIC
NUMBER
COUNTS
CORE
PHOTO
DEPTH
(kg/cm^2)
BLOW
CORE
RQD PL MC LL
LOG
(m)

(%)
(%) 20 40 60 80
SPT N VALUE
20 40 60 80 20 40 60 80
10 20 30 40 50
medium hard, firm, moist. 20.00 SPT 9-12-13 25
SILT, dark grey, medium plasticity, 20.45 10 (25)
21 medium hard, firm, moist.
22
22.00 SPT 9-10-11 21
22.45 11 (21)
23
24
GRAVEL, gray, medium, non 24.00 SPT 10-12-16 28
plasticity, dense. 24.45 12 (28)
25
SILT, dark grey, medium plasticity,

26.00 SPT 9-25-25/11 >>
SAND, gray to dark gray, sub
26.41 13
angular to rounded, medium to
27 hard, non plasticity, dense to very
dense.
28
SILT, dark grey, medium plasticity, 28.00 SPT 10-12-14 26
medium hard, firm, moist. 28.45 14 (26)
29
30
GRAVEL, gray, medium, non 30.00 SPT 6-7-8 15
plasticity, dense. 30.45 15 (15)
31
32 SAND to gravel, gray to dark
32.00 SPT 16-23- >>
32.42 16 27/12
medium, non plasticity, dense,
33 subrounded to angular.

SAND, gray to dark gray, sub 34.00 SPT 12-14-15 29
angular to rounded, medium to 34.45 17 (29)
35 hard, non plasticity, dense.
36
SAND, gray to dark gray, sub 36.00 SPT 14-21-24 45
angular to rounded, medium to 36.45 18 (45)
medium hard, dense, moist.
38
SAND, gray to dark gray, sub 38.00 SPT 43-50/12 >>
rounded to rounded, medium to 38.27 19
SAND to gravel gray to dark brown,
coarse to very coarse, medium, non
40 plasticity, dense, subrounded to
angular. 40.00 SPT 20-26-24/0 >>
40.27 20
Bottom of borehole at 40.37
meters.
TIGENCO GRAHA PERSADA
CONE PENETROMETER TEST S-01
Project SOIL INVESTIGATION PLTMG ALOR Capacity : 2.5 TON
Location 10 MWFANATING, TELUK
DESA Koordinat : X : 668566
Date of Test MUTIARA,ALOR, NTT.
7-Mar-18 Y : 9088365
Tested By Yaqin Z=6.322
Checked By Andrianto H. Nugroho ST, MT GWL : -
Depth R1 R2 LF TF TF/10 %fr

meter kg/cm² kg/cm² kg/cm² kg/cm kg/cm
0.0 0.00 0.00 0.2 4.0 # 0.0
0.2 2.00 5.00 0.3 10.7 # 16.7
0.4 2.00 7.00 0.1 13.3 # 6.7
0.6 2.00 4.00 0.4 21.3 # 20.0
0.8 3.00 9.00 0.4 29.3 # 13.3
1.0 3.00 9.00 0.4 37.3 # 13.3
1.2 5.00 11.00 0.9 54.7 # 17.3
1.4 37.00 50.00 1.3 81.3 # 3.6
1.6 85.00 105.00 2.7 134.7 # 3.1
1.8 105.00 145.00 3.3 201.3 # 3.2
2.0 200.00 250.00 0.0 201.3 # 0.0
PT. TIGENCO GRAHA PERSADA
Test Point :
CONE PENETROMETER TEST
S-01
DESA Koordinat : X : 668566
7-Mar-18 Y : 9088365
FRICTION
CONE RESISTANCE (KG/CM2) TOTAL FRICTION/10 RATIO %
0.00 0.00
1.00 1.00
Kedalaman (meter)
DEPTH (m)
2.00 2.00
3.00 3.00
0 50 100 150 200 250 0 10 20 30
DESA Koordinat : X=668458
10-Mar-18 Y=9088340

0.0 0.00 0.00 0.2 4.0 # 0.0
0.2 2.00 5.00 0.1 6.7 # 6.7
0.4 2.00 4.00 0.1 9.3 # 6.7
0.6 2.00 4.00 0.2 13.3 # 10.0
0.8 5.00 8.00 0.3 18.7 # 5.3
1.0 5.00 9.00 0.3 25.3 # 6.7
1.2 5.00 10.00 0.4 33.3 # 8.0
1.4 10.00 16.00 0.9 50.7 # 8.7
1.6 15.00 28.00 2.0 90.7 # 13.3
1.8 55.00 85.00 1.0 110.7 # 1.8
2.0 70.00 85.00 4.7 204.0 # 6.7
2.2 125.00 195.00 2.7 257.3 # 2.1
2.4 105.00 145.00 2.7 310.7 # 2.5
2.6 210.00 250.00 0.0 310.7 # 0.0
Test Point :
S-02
10-Mar-18 Y=9088340
FRICTION
0.00 0.00
1.00 1.00
Kedalaman (meter)
DEPTH (m)
2.00 2.00
3.00 3.00
0 50 100 150 200 250 0 5 10 15
9-Mar-18 Y=9088397

0.0 0.00 0.00 0.1 1.3 # 0.0
0.2 4.00 5.00 0.2 5.3 # 5.0
0.4 4.00 7.00 0.0 5.3 # 0.0
0.6 4.00 4.00 0.4 13.3 # 10.0
0.8 5.00 11.00 0.5 24.0 # 10.7
1.0 17.00 25.00 0.3 30.7 # 2.0
1.2 25.00 30.00 1.2 54.7 # 4.8
1.4 30.00 48.00 3.3 121.3 # 11.1
1.6 95.00 145.00 2.3 168.0 # 2.5
Test Point :
S-03
9-Mar-18 Y=9088397
Series2
CONE RESISTANCE (KG/CM2) TOTAL FRICTION/10
0.00 0.00
1.00 1.00
Kedalaman (meter)
DEPTH (m)
2.00 2.00
3.00 3.00
0 50 100 150 200 250 0 5 10 15
Date of Test MUTIARA,ALOR,
7-Mar-18 NTT. Y=9088409

0.0 0.00 0.00 0.1 1.3 # 0.0
0.2 1.00 2.00 0.2 5.3 # 20.0
0.4 2.00 5.00 0.6 17.3 # 30.0
0.6 5.00 14.00 0.3 22.7 # 5.3
0.8 6.00 10.00 0.3 29.3 # 5.6
1.0 10.00 15.00 0.5 38.7 # 4.7
1.2 21.00 28.00 3.0 98.7 # 14.3
1.4 100.00 145.00 4.0 178.7 # 4.0
1.6 90.00 150.00 1.0 198.7 # 1.1
1.8 105.00 120.00 2.0 238.7 # 1.9
2.0 100.00 130.00 1.3 265.3 # 1.3
2.2 80.00 100.00 0.3 272.0 # 0.4
2.4 30.00 35.00 0.3 278.7 # 1.1
2.6 20.00 25.00 0.6 290.7 # 3.0
2.8 40.00 49.00 0.9 309.3 # 2.3
3.0 45.00 59.00 1.0 329.3 # 2.2
3.2 80.00 95.00 3.3 396.0 # 4.2
3.4 200.00 250.00 0.0 396.0 # 0.0
Test Point :
S-04
Date of Test MUTIARA,ALOR,
7-Mar-18 NTT. Y=9088409
FRICTION
0.00 0.00
1.00 1.00
Kedalaman (meter)
DEPTH (m)
2.00 2.00
3.00 3.00
4.00 4.00
0 50 100 150 200 250 0 5 10 15 20
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
COA No : / P064-18
Report To:
PT. Truba Jaya Engineering

Graha Truba, Jl. Swadaya II No. 07 Jagakarsa Jakarta Selatan
Attention:
Mr. Andrianto Nugroho
PT. WLN Indonesia
Arief Rakhmadi
Director
This Certificate prepared for client named in this report. This Certificate must not be reproduced except in full. It is Not Allowed to copy (parts of) this
Certificate without permission of PT. Water Laboratory Nusantara. Please Contact PT. Water Laboratory Nusantara for any further information
regarding the Certificate.
Page 1 of 13
REPORT REMARKS & DESCRIPTION

REMARKS
APHA : American Published Health Association
mg/L : Milligram per litre
UoM : Unit of Measurement
DL : Detection Limit
GRL : Government Regulation Limit
Rem Q : Remarks of KAN Accredited parameters
< : Less than Detection Limit indicated
n/a : Not available
COC : Chains of Custody
DESCRIPTIONS
Blank : Blank or also known as Reagent Blank performed during analysis to determine contribution
reagents and preparative analytical steps to error in the measurement. Blank result acceptance are below
detection limit stated on the report (APHA,2012).
% Recovery Control Standard : Control standard performed during analysis is a reagent water samples to
which a known concentration of the analytes of interest has been added. It is use to evaluate laboratory
performance (APHA,2012)
Detection Limit : Smallest amount that can be detected above the noise in a procedure and within stated
confidence level. The confidence level are set so that the probabilities of errors are acceptably small
(APHA,2012)
Bogor, 16 April 2018

Reviewed by:
Peni A. Saputri
Deputy Quality Manager
Page 2 of 13
PROJECT INFORMATION
Contract No. : - WLN PQ No. : B18PQ020036-Rev.1

PO reff : - WLN COC No. : P070-18
WLN Project No. : 18P0279 WLN WO No. : -
SAMPLE INFORMATION
Number of sample : 5
No Customer sample ID WLN Lab ID Sample Matrix Sampling Date Registration Date
1 Sampel-01(1.30cm) 1802790 Ground Water 3/27/2018 4/2/2018
2 Sampel-02(2m) 1802791 Ground Water 3/27/2018 4/2/2018
6 BH - 01 (3.0 - 4.0 m) 1803875 Sediment - 4/27/2018
7 BH - 01 (5.0 - 5.5 m) 1803876 Sediment - 4/27/2018
8 Bh - 02 (3.0 - 4.0 m) 1803877 Sediment - 4/27/2018
9 BH - 02 (5.0 - 6.0 m) 1803878 Sediment - 4/27/2018

WLN-Q-F.5.10.1
Page 3 of 13
SURFACE WATER ANALYSIS RESULTS

Customer sample ID : Sampel-01(1.30cm) WLN Lab ID : 1802790
Sample Matrix : Ground Water Reg. Date : 4/2/2018

Sampling By : Customer Coordinates : -
Sampling Date : 3/27/2018
Government Regulation Limit (GRL) : -
No Test Description UoM Result GRL Method Reference Rem Q
Nutrients
1 Ammonia (N-NH3) mg/L < 0.02 n/a APHA-4500NH3-D(2005) Q
2 Nitrate (N-NO3) mg/L 0.002 n/a APHA-4500-NO3 E(2012) Q
Metals
3 Calcium-Dissolved (Ca) mg/L 31.7 n/a APHA-3120-B(2012) Q
4 Magnesium-Dissolved (Mg) mg/L 9.18 n/a APHA-3120-B(2012) Q
5 Potassium-Dissolved (K) mg/L 6.5 n/a APHA-3120-B(2012) Q
6 Sodium-Dissolved (Na) mg/L 11.7 n/a APHA-3120-B(2012) Q

WLN-Q-F.5.10.1
Page 4 of 8

Customer sample ID : Sampel-02(2m) WLN Lab ID : 1802791

Nutrients
1 Ammonia (N-NH3) mg/L 0.08 n/a APHA-4500NH3-D(2005) Q
Metals
4 Magnesium-Dissolved (Mg) mg/L 14 n/a APHA-3120-B(2012) Q

WLN-Q-F.5.10.1
Page 5 of 8


Nutrients
1 Ammonia (N-NH3) mg/L 0.10 n/a APHA-4500NH3-D(2005) Q
Metals

WLN-Q-F.5.10.1
Page 6 of 13


Physical Test
1 p-Alkalinity mg/L <1 n/a APHA-2320-B(2005) Q
2 m-Alkalinity mg/L 165 n/a APHA-2320-B(2005) Q
3 Alkalinity hydroxide mg/L <1 n/a APHA-2320-B(2012)
4 Acidity mg/L 74 n/a APHA 2310-B(2012) Q
Chemicals-Anion
5 pH n/a 7.03 n/a APHA 4500H+ B (2005) Q
WLNB-CL-WI.05
6 Chloride mg/L 10.4 n/a Q
(Spektrofotometri)
Metals

WLN-Q-F.5.10.1
Page 7 of 8


Physical Test
1 p-Alkalinity mg/L <1 n/a APHA-2320-B(2005) Q
2 m-Alkalinity mg/L 338 n/a APHA-2320-B(2005) Q
3 Alkalinity hydroxide mg/L <1 n/a APHA-2320-B(2012)
4 Acidity mg/L 29 n/a APHA 2310-B(2012) Q
Chemicals-Anion
5 pH n/a 7.21 n/a APHA 4500H+ B (2005) Q
WLNB-CL-WI.05
6 Chloride mg/L 6.0 n/a Q
(Spektrofotometri)
Metals

Page 8 of 13
LABORATORY QUALITY CONTROL

% Recovery Control Analysis

No Test Description UoM DL Blank
Standard Location
Physical Test
1 p-Alkalinity mg/L 1 <1 95% Bogor
2 m-Alkalinity mg/L 1 <1 95% Bogor
3 Alkalinity hydroxide mg/L 1 <1 95% Bogor
4 Acidity mg/L 1 <1 98% Bogor
Chemical-Anions
5 pH n/a n/a n/a 100% Bogor
6 Chloride mg/L 0.5 < 0.5 94% Bogor
Nutrients
7 Ammonia (N-NH3) mg/L 0.02 < 0.02 104% Bogor
8 Nitrate (N-NO3) mg/L 0.005 < 0.005 95% Bogor
Metals
9 Calcium-Dissolved (Ca) mg/L 1 <1 104% Manado
10 Magnesium-Dissolved (Mg) mg/L 0.5 < 0.5 108% Manado
11 Potassium-Dissolved (K) mg/L 5 <5 96% Manado
12 Sodium-Dissolved (Na) mg/L 0.5 < 0.5 103% Manado

Page 9 of 13
SEDIMENT ANALYSIS RESULTS

Customer sample ID : BH - 01 (3.0 - 4.0 m) WLN Lab ID : 1803875
Sample Matrix : Sediment Reg. Date : 4/27/2018

Sampling Date : -
Rem
No Test Description UoM Result GRL Method Reference
Q
Chemicals-Anion
1 Sulphate-extractable with H2O 1:10 mg/kg dry 132 n/a ASTM C1580
Page 10 of 13


Sampling Date : -
Rem
Q
Chemicals-Anion

Page 11 of 13

Customer sample ID : Bh - 02 (3.0 - 4.0 m) WLN Lab ID : 1803877

Sampling Date : -
Rem
Q
Chemicals-Anion
Page 12 of 13


Sampling Date : -
Rem
Q
Chemicals-Anion
Page 13 of 13
LABORATORY QUALITY CONTROL

% Recovery Control Analysis

No Test Description UoM DL Blank
Standard Location
Chemicals-Anion
1 Sulphate-extractable with H2O 1:10 mg/kg dry 2 <2 109% Bogor

GWLMW 1.65 m SAFETY FACTOR TIP 3 MADE WIWIT
Allowable Bearing Allowable
SOIL* Pile Tip Friction
NSP Tension
DEPTH T
Cu φ ϒ ϒ' σO' α ko Nq fs (kPa) qp Resist. Resist. Capacity Capacity
0.0 40 S 0.0 41.8 20.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.33 83.3 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0.5 40 S 0.0 41.8 20.0 20.0 10.0 0.0 0.33 83.3 3.0 833 105 2 36 4 0
1.0 40 S 0.0 41.8 20.0 20.0 20.0 0.0 0.33 83.3 6.0 1666 209 6 72 7 0
1.5 40 S 0.0 41.8 20.0 20.0 30.0 0.0 0.33 83.3 8.9 2498 314 11 108 11 0
2.0 40 S 0.0 41.8 20.0 10.2 35.1 0.0 0.33 83.3 10.5 2923 367 18 128 13 0
2.5 40 S 0.0 41.8 20.0 10.2 40.2 0.0 0.33 83.3 12.0 3348 421 25 149 15 1
3.0 40 S 0.0 41.8 20.0 10.2 45.3 0.0 0.33 83.3 13.5 3773 474 34 169 17 1
3.5 40 S 0.0 41.8 20.0 10.2 50.4 0.0 0.33 83.3 15.0 4197 527 43 190 19 1
4.0 40 S 0.0 41.8 20.0 10.2 55.5 0.0 0.33 83.3 16.5 4622 581 54 212 22 1
4.5 40 S 0.0 41.8 20.0 10.2 60.6 0.0 0.33 83.3 18.1 5047 634 65 233 24 2
5.0 40 S 0.0 41.8 20.0 10.2 65.7 0.0 0.33 83.3 19.6 5472 688 77 255 26 2
5.5 40 S 0.0 41.8 20.0 10.2 70.8 0.0 0.33 83.3 21.1 5896 741 91 277 28 2
6.0 40 S 0.0 41.8 20.0 10.2 75.9 0.0 0.33 83.3 22.6 6321 794 105 300 31 2
6.5 40 S 0.0 41.8 20.0 10.2 81.0 0.0 0.33 83.3 24.1 6746 848 120 323 33 3
7.0 40 S 0.0 41.8 20.0 10.2 86.1 0.0 0.33 83.3 25.7 7171 901 136 346 35 3
7.5 40 S 0.0 41.8 20.0 10.2 91.2 0.0 0.33 83.3 27.2 7595 954 153 369 38 4
8.0 40 S 0.0 41.8 20.0 10.2 96.3 0.0 0.33 83.3 28.7 8020 1008 171 393 40 4
8.5 40 S 0.0 41.8 20.0 10.2 101.4 0.0 0.33 83.3 30.2 8445 1061 190 417 43 5
9.0 40 S 0.0 41.8 20.0 10.2 106.5 0.0 0.33 83.3 31.7 8870 1115 210 442 45 5
9.5 40 S 0.0 41.8 20.0 10.2 111.6 0.0 0.33 83.3 33.3 9294 1168 231 466 48 5
10.0 40 S 0.0 41.8 20.0 10.2 116.7 0.0 0.33 83.3 34.8 9719 1221 253 491 50 6
10.5 19 S 0.0 33.5 18.0 8.2 120.8 0.0 0.45 27.7 35.8 3343 420 275 232 24 7
11.0 19 S 0.0 33.5 18.0 8.2 124.9 0.0 0.45 27.7 37.0 3456 434 299 244 25 7
11.5 19 S 0.0 33.5 18.0 8.2 129.0 0.0 0.45 27.7 38.3 3570 449 323 257 26 8
12.0 19 S 0.0 33.5 18.0 8.2 133.1 0.0 0.45 27.7 39.5 3683 463 348 270 28 8
12.5 19 S 0.0 33.5 18.0 8.2 137.2 0.0 0.45 27.7 40.7 3797 477 373 283 29 9
13.0 19 S 0.0 33.5 18.0 8.2 141.3 0.0 0.45 27.7 41.9 3910 491 399 297 30 10
13.5 19 S 0.0 33.5 18.0 8.2 145.4 0.0 0.45 27.7 43.1 4024 506 427 311 32 10
14.0 19 S 0.0 33.5 18.0 8.2 149.5 0.0 0.45 27.7 44.3 4137 520 454 325 33 11
14.5 19 S 0.0 33.5 18.0 8.2 153.6 0.0 0.45 27.7 45.6 4251 534 483 339 35 11
15.0 19 S 0.0 33.5 18.0 8.2 157.7 0.0 0.45 27.7 46.8 4364 548 512 354 36 12
15.5 19 S 0.0 33.5 18.0 8.2 161.8 0.0 0.45 27.7 48.0 4478 563 543 368 38 13
16.0 19 S 0.0 33.5 18.0 8.2 165.9 0.0 0.45 27.7 49.2 4591 577 573 383 39 14
16.5 19 S 0.0 33.5 18.0 8.2 170.0 0.0 0.45 27.7 50.4 4705 591 605 399 41 14
17.0 19 S 0.0 33.5 18.0 8.2 174.1 0.0 0.45 27.7 51.6 4818 605 638 414 42 15
17.5 19 S 0.0 33.5 18.0 8.2 178.2 0.0 0.45 27.7 52.8 4932 620 671 430 44 16
18.0 19 S 0.0 33.5 18.0 8.2 182.3 0.0 0.45 27.7 54.1 5045 634 705 446 45 17
18.5 19 S 0.0 33.5 18.0 8.2 186.4 0.0 0.45 27.7 55.3 5158 648 739 463 47 18
19.0 19 S 0.0 33.5 18.0 8.2 190.5 0.0 0.45 27.7 56.5 5272 662 775 479 49 18
19.5 19 S 0.0 33.5 18.0 8.2 194.6 0.0 0.45 27.7 57.7 5385 677 811 496 51 19
20.0 19 S 0.0 33.5 18.0 8.2 198.7 0.0 0.45 27.7 58.9 5499 691 848 513 52 20
20.5 19 S 0.0 33.5 18.0 8.2 202.8 0.0 0.45 27.7 60.1 5612 705 886 530 54 21
21.0 19 S 0.0 33.5 18.0 8.2 206.9 0.0 0.45 27.7 61.4 5726 720 925 548 56 22
21.5 42 S 0.0 42.5 19.5 9.7 211.8 0.0 0.32 91.9 62.9 19459 2445 964 1136 116 23
22.0 42 S 0.0 42.5 19.5 9.7 216.6 0.0 0.32 91.9 64.4 19905 2501 1005 1169 119 24
22.5 42 S 0.0 42.5 19.5 9.7 221.5 0.0 0.32 91.9 65.8 20350 2557 1046 1201 122 25
23.0 42 S 0.0 42.5 19.5 9.7 226.3 0.0 0.32 91.9 67.3 20796 2613 1088 1234 126 26
23.5 42 S 0.0 42.5 19.5 9.7 231.2 0.0 0.32 91.9 68.7 21242 2669 1131 1267 129 27
24.0 42 S 0.0 42.5 19.5 9.7 236.0 0.0 0.32 91.9 70.2 21687 2725 1175 1300 133 28
24.5 42 S 0.0 42.5 19.5 9.7 240.9 0.0 0.32 91.9 71.6 22055 2772 1220 1331 136 29
25.0 42 S 0.0 42.5 19.5 9.7 245.7 0.0 0.32 91.9 73.0 22055 2772 1266 1346 137 30
25.5 42 S 0.0 42.5 19.5 9.7 250.6 0.0 0.32 91.9 74.5 22055 2772 1313 1362 139 31
26.0 42 S 0.0 42.5 19.5 9.7 255.4 0.0 0.32 91.9 75.9 22055 2772 1361 1377 140 32
26.5 42 S 0.0 42.5 19.5 9.7 260.3 0.0 0.32 91.9 77.4 22055 2772 1409 1394 142 34
NSP Tension
DEPTH T
27.0 42 S 0.0 42.5 19.5 9.7 265.1 0.0 0.32 91.9 78.8 22055 2772 1459 1410 144 35
27.5 42 S 0.0 42.5 19.5 9.7 270.0 0.0 0.32 91.9 80.2 22055 2772 1509 1427 145 36
28.0 42 S 0.0 42.5 19.5 9.7 274.8 0.0 0.32 91.9 81.7 22055 2772 1561 1444 147 37
28.5 42 S 0.0 42.5 19.5 9.7 279.7 0.0 0.32 91.9 83.1 22055 2772 1613 1461 149 38
29.0 42 S 0.0 42.5 19.5 9.7 284.5 0.0 0.32 91.9 84.6 22055 2772 1666 1479 151 40
29.5 42 S 0.0 42.5 19.5 9.7 289.4 0.0 0.32 91.9 86.0 22055 2772 1720 1497 153 41
30.0 42 S 0.0 42.5 19.5 9.7 294.2 0.0 0.32 91.9 87.5 22055 2772 1775 1516 154 42
30.5 42 S 0.0 42.5 19.5 9.7 299.1 0.0 0.32 91.9 88.9 22055 2772 1831 1534 156 44
31.0 42 S 0.0 42.5 19.5 9.7 303.9 0.0 0.32 91.9 90.3 22055 2772 1888 1553 158 45
31.5 42 S 0.0 42.5 19.5 9.7 308.8 0.0 0.32 91.9 91.8 22055 2772 1945 1572 160 46
32.0 42 S 0.0 42.5 19.5 9.7 313.6 0.0 0.32 91.9 93.2 22055 2772 2004 1592 162 48
32.5 42 S 0.0 42.5 19.5 9.7 318.5 0.0 0.32 91.9 94.7 22055 2772 2063 1612 164 49
33.0 42 S 0.0 42.5 19.5 9.7 323.3 0.0 0.32 91.9 96.1 22055 2772 2124 1632 166 51
33.5 42 S 0.0 42.5 19.5 9.7 328.2 0.0 0.32 91.9 97.5 22055 2772 2185 1652 168 52
34.0 42 S 0.0 42.5 19.5 9.7 333.0 0.0 0.32 91.9 99.0 22055 2772 2247 1673 171 53
34.5 42 S 0.0 42.5 19.5 9.7 337.9 0.0 0.32 91.9 100.4 22055 2772 2310 1694 173 55
35.0 42 S 0.0 42.5 19.5 9.7 342.7 0.0 0.32 91.9 101.9 22055 2772 2374 1715 175 56
35.5 42 S 0.0 42.5 19.5 9.7 347.6 0.0 0.32 91.9 103.3 22055 2772 2439 1737 177 58
36.0 42 S 0.0 42.5 19.5 9.7 352.4 0.0 0.32 91.9 104.8 22055 2772 2505 1759 179 60
36.5 42 S 0.0 42.5 19.5 9.7 357.3 0.0 0.32 91.9 106.2 22055 2772 2572 1781 182 61
37.0 42 S 0.0 42.5 19.5 9.7 362.1 0.0 0.32 91.9 107.6 22055 2772 2640 1804 184 63
37.5 42 S 0.0 42.5 19.5 9.7 367.0 0.0 0.32 91.9 109.1 22055 2772 2708 1827 186 64
38.0 42 S 0.0 42.5 19.5 9.7 371.8 0.0 0.32 91.9 110.5 22055 2772 2777 1850 189 66
38.5 42 S 0.0 42.5 19.5 9.7 376.7 0.0 0.32 91.9 112.0 22055 2772 2848 1873 191 68
39.0 42 S 0.0 42.5 19.5 9.7 381.5 0.0 0.32 91.9 113.4 22055 2772 2919 1897 193 69
39.5 42 S 0.0 42.5 19.5 9.7 386.4 0.0 0.32 91.9 114.8 22055 2772 2991 1921 196 71
40.0 42 S 0.0 42.5 19.5 9.7 391.2 0.0 0.32 91.9 116.3 22055 2772 3064 1945 198 73
Notes: C = CLAY, S=SAND
SPUN PILE CAPACITY ALLOWABLE BEARING CAPACITY GRAPH
METHOD: API RP2A-WSD
PROJECT SOIL INVESTIGATION PLTMG ALOR10 MW SAFETY FACTOR TIP 3 BOREHOLE BH-01
LOCATION DESA FANATING, TELUK MUTIARA, ALOR, NTT SAFETY FACTOR SKIN 3 MADE BY AHN
Allowable Bearing Capacity of Spun Pile Allowable Tension Capacity of Spun Pile
17.5 Bearing Capacity
Allowable Allowable Tension Capacity
0 50 100 150 200 250 0 50 100
0 0
5 5
35.3 0.4 0.4
10 10
15 15
Depth from Surface (m)

20 20
25 25
17.8
30 30
35 35
40 40
94.5 17.5
45 45
NSP Tension
DEPTH T
0.0 C 22.5 0.0 18.5 18.5 0.0 0.0 1.00 1.0 0.0 203 25 0 8 1 0
0.5 C 22.5 0.0 18.5 18.5 9.3 0.4 1.00 1.0 9.0 203 25 6 10 1 0
1.0 C 22.5 0.0 18.5 18.5 18.5 0.5 1.00 1.0 10.7 203 25 12 13 1 0
1.5 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 23.1 0.0 0.36 61.9 6.9 1430 180 17 65 7 0
2.0 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 27.7 0.0 0.36 61.9 8.3 1715 216 22 79 8 1
2.5 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 32.3 0.0 0.36 61.9 9.7 2000 251 28 93 9 1
3.0 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 36.9 0.0 0.36 61.9 11.1 2285 287 35 107 11 1
3.5 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 41.5 0.0 0.36 61.9 12.4 2570 323 43 122 12 1
4.0 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 46.1 0.0 0.36 61.9 13.8 2855 359 52 137 14 1
4.5 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 50.7 0.0 0.36 61.9 15.2 3140 395 61 152 15 1
5.0 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 55.3 0.0 0.36 61.9 16.6 3424 430 71 167 17 2
5.5 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 59.9 0.0 0.36 61.9 18.0 3709 466 83 183 19 2
6.0 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 64.5 0.0 0.36 61.9 19.3 3994 502 95 199 20 2
6.5 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 69.1 0.0 0.36 61.9 20.7 4279 538 108 215 22 3
7.0 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 73.7 0.0 0.36 61.9 22.1 4564 574 122 232 24 3
7.5 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 78.3 0.0 0.36 61.9 23.5 4849 609 137 249 25 3
8.0 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 82.9 0.0 0.36 61.9 24.9 5133 645 152 266 27 4
8.5 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 87.5 0.0 0.36 61.9 26.2 5418 681 169 283 29 4
9.0 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 92.1 0.0 0.36 61.9 27.6 5703 717 186 301 31 4
9.5 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 96.7 0.0 0.36 61.9 29.0 5988 752 204 319 33 5
10.0 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 101.3 0.0 0.36 61.9 30.4 6273 788 223 337 34 5
10.5 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 105.9 0.0 0.36 61.9 31.8 6558 824 243 356 36 6
11.0 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 110.5 0.0 0.36 61.9 33.1 6843 860 264 375 38 6
11.5 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 115.1 0.0 0.36 61.9 34.5 7127 896 286 394 40 7
12.0 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 119.7 0.0 0.36 61.9 35.9 7412 931 308 413 42 7
12.5 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 124.3 0.0 0.36 61.9 37.3 7697 967 332 433 44 8
13.0 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 128.9 0.0 0.36 61.9 38.7 7982 1003 356 453 46 8
13.5 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 133.5 0.0 0.36 61.9 40.0 8267 1039 381 473 48 9
14.0 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 138.1 0.0 0.36 61.9 41.4 8552 1075 407 494 50 10
14.5 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 142.7 0.0 0.36 61.9 42.8 8837 1110 434 515 52 10
15.0 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 147.3 0.0 0.36 61.9 44.2 9121 1146 462 536 55 11
15.5 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 151.9 0.0 0.36 61.9 45.6 9406 1182 491 558 57 12
16.0 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 156.5 0.0 0.36 61.9 46.9 9691 1218 520 579 59 12
16.5 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 161.1 0.0 0.36 61.9 48.3 9976 1254 550 601 61 13
17.0 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 165.7 0.0 0.36 61.9 49.7 10261 1289 582 624 64 14
17.5 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 170.3 0.0 0.36 61.9 51.1 10546 1325 614 646 66 15
18.0 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 174.9 0.0 0.36 61.9 52.4 10830 1361 647 669 68 15
18.5 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 179.5 0.0 0.36 61.9 53.8 11115 1397 680 692 71 16
19.0 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 184.1 0.0 0.36 61.9 55.2 11400 1433 715 716 73 17
19.5 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 188.7 0.0 0.36 61.9 56.6 11685 1468 751 740 75 18
20.0 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 193.3 0.0 0.36 61.9 58.0 11970 1504 787 764 78 19
20.5 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 197.9 0.0 0.36 61.9 59.3 12255 1540 824 788 80 20
21.0 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 202.5 0.0 0.36 61.9 60.7 12540 1576 863 813 83 21
21.5 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 207.1 0.0 0.36 61.9 62.1 12824 1612 902 838 85 21
22.0 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 211.7 0.0 0.36 61.9 63.5 13109 1647 941 863 88 22
22.5 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 216.3 0.0 0.36 61.9 64.9 13394 1683 982 888 91 23
23.0 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 220.9 0.0 0.36 61.9 66.2 13679 1719 1024 914 93 24
23.5 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 225.5 0.0 0.36 61.9 67.6 13964 1755 1066 940 96 25
24.0 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 230.1 0.0 0.36 61.9 69.0 14249 1791 1110 967 99 26
24.5 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 234.7 0.0 0.36 61.9 70.4 14533 1826 1154 993 101 27
25.0 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 239.3 0.0 0.36 61.9 71.8 14818 1862 1199 1020 104 29
25.5 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 243.9 0.0 0.36 61.9 73.1 14862 1868 1245 1038 106 30
26.0 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 248.5 0.0 0.36 61.9 74.5 14862 1868 1292 1053 107 31
26.5 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 253.1 0.0 0.36 61.9 75.9 14862 1868 1339 1069 109 32
NSP Tension
DEPTH T
27.0 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 257.7 0.0 0.36 61.9 77.3 14862 1868 1388 1085 111 33
27.5 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 262.3 0.0 0.36 61.9 78.7 14862 1868 1437 1102 112 34
28.0 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 266.9 0.0 0.36 61.9 80.0 14862 1868 1488 1118 114 35
28.5 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 271.5 0.0 0.36 61.9 81.4 14862 1868 1539 1135 116 37
29.0 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 276.1 0.0 0.36 61.9 82.8 14862 1868 1591 1153 118 38
29.5 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 280.7 0.0 0.36 61.9 84.2 14862 1868 1644 1170 119 39
30.0 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 285.3 0.0 0.36 61.9 85.6 14862 1868 1698 1188 121 40
30.5 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 289.9 0.0 0.36 61.9 86.9 14862 1868 1752 1207 123 42
31.0 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 294.5 0.0 0.36 61.9 88.3 14862 1868 1808 1225 125 43
31.5 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 299.1 0.0 0.36 61.9 89.7 14862 1868 1864 1244 127 44
32.0 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 303.7 0.0 0.36 61.9 91.1 14862 1868 1921 1263 129 46
32.5 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 308.3 0.0 0.36 61.9 92.5 14862 1868 1979 1282 131 47
33.0 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 312.9 0.0 0.36 61.9 93.8 14862 1868 2038 1302 133 48
33.5 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 317.5 0.0 0.36 61.9 95.2 14862 1868 2098 1322 135 50
34.0 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 322.1 0.0 0.36 61.9 96.6 14862 1868 2159 1342 137 51
34.5 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 326.7 0.0 0.36 61.9 98.0 14862 1868 2220 1363 139 53
35.0 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 331.3 0.0 0.36 61.9 99.4 14862 1868 2283 1383 141 54
35.5 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 335.9 0.0 0.36 61.9 100.7 14862 1868 2346 1405 143 56
36.0 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 340.5 0.0 0.36 61.9 102.1 14862 1868 2410 1426 145 57
36.5 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 345.1 0.0 0.36 61.9 103.5 14862 1868 2475 1448 148 59
37.0 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 349.7 0.0 0.36 61.9 104.9 14862 1868 2541 1470 150 60
37.5 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 354.3 0.0 0.36 61.9 106.2 14862 1868 2608 1492 152 62
38.0 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 358.9 0.0 0.36 61.9 107.6 14862 1868 2676 1514 154 64
38.5 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 363.5 0.0 0.36 61.9 109.0 14862 1868 2744 1537 157 65
39.0 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 368.1 0.0 0.36 61.9 110.4 14862 1868 2813 1560 159 67
39.5 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 372.7 0.0 0.36 61.9 111.8 14862 1868 2884 1584 161 69
40.0 34 S 0.0 39.7 19.0 9.2 377.3 0.0 0.36 61.9 113.1 14862 1868 2955 1607 164 70
Notes: C = CLAY, S=SAND
SPUN PILE CAPACITY ALLOWABLE BEARING CAPACITY GRAPH
METHOD: API RP2A-WSD
PROJECT SOIL INVESTIGATION PLTMG ALOR10 MW SAFETY FACTOR TIP 3 BOREHOLE BH-02
LOCATION DESA FANATING, TELUK MUTIARA, ALOR, NTT SAFETY FACTOR SKIN 3 MADE BY AHN
Allowable Bearing Capacity of Spun Pile Allowable Tension Capacity of Spun Pile
17.5 Bearing Capacity
Allowable Allowable Tension Capacity
0 100 200 0 50 100
0 0
5 5
35.3 0.4 0.4
10 10
15 15

20 20
25 25
17.8
30 30
35 35
40 40
94.5 17.5
45 45
SHALLOW FOUNDATION BEARING CAPACITY CALCULATION BASED ON SPT
MEYERHOFF 1974 WITH BOWLES MODIFICATION FOR 25 mm SETTLEMENT
Allowable
Bearing
Borehole SPT Dimension Footing Footing Kd F2 F3 Pressure
Assumed Width Depth for 25 mm
settlement
ton/m2
BH-01 32 1x1 1 1 1.330 0.06 0.3 120
BH-01 33 1x1 1 2 1.330 0.06 0.3 124
BH-01 38 1x1 1 3 1.330 0.06 0.3 142
BH-01 32 2x2 2 1 1.165 0.06 0.3 82
BH-01 33 2x2 2 2 1.330 0.06 0.3 97
BH-01 38 2x2 2 3 1.330 0.06 0.3 111
BH-01 32 3x3 3 1 1.110 0.06 0.3 72
BH-01 33 3x3 3 2 1.220 0.06 0.3 81
BH-01 38 3x3 3 3 1.330 0.06 0.3 102
Allowable Shallow Bearing Capacity-Square (ton/m2)
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

0
0.5
1
1x1m
Depth (m)
1.5 2x2m
3x3m
2
2.5
3.5
MEYERHOFF 1974 WITH BOWLES MODIFICATION FOR 25 mm SETTLEMENT
Allowable
Bearing
Borehole SPT Dimension Footing Footing Kd F2 F3 Pressure
Assumed Width Depth for 25 mm
settlement
ton/m2
BH-02 23 1x1 1 1 1.330 0.06 0.3 86
BH-02 34 1x1 1 2 1.330 0.06 0.3 127
BH-02 22 1x1 1 3 1.330 0.06 0.3 82
BH-02 23 2x2 2 1 1.165 0.06 0.3 59
BH-02 34 2x2 2 2 1.330 0.06 0.3 100
BH-02 22 2x2 2 3 1.330 0.06 0.3 64
BH-02 23 3x3 3 1 1.110 0.06 0.3 51
BH-02 34 3x3 3 2 1.220 0.06 0.3 84
BH-02 22 3x3 3 3 1.330 0.06 0.3 59
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140

0
0.5
1
1x1m
Depth (m)
1.5 2x2m
3x3m
2
2.5
3.5
COMPARED WITH BASED ON ANALYTICAL METHOD
0 100 200 300 400 500 600

0
0.5
1x1m
1 2x2m
ANALYTICAL
3x3m
Depth (m)
1.5 1x1m
2x2m
2 3x3m
2.5 SPT METHOD
BH-01
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

0
0.5
1
1x1m
Depth (m)
2x2m
1.5 ANALYTICAL 3x3m
1x1m
2x2m
2 3x3m
2.5
SPT METHOD
BH-02
From the results it is shwon that SPT method yielded the lowest result so the SPT method will be used.
1 of 4
CALCULATION OF SHALLOW BEARING CAPACITY

Project Soil Data
SOIL INVESTIGATION PLTMG ALOR from corelation, SPT, CPT results, lab test and judgement. As per chapter 4. Soil Parameter
10 MW
Client PT. TRUBA JAYA ENGINEERINGRecommendation
BH-01
Borehole Number BH-01
Method Meyerhoff (1963)
(Meyerhoff 1963)
(Meyerhoff 1963)
(Meyerhoff 1963)
q allowable
q allowable
q ultimate
(SF=3)
(SF=3)
Depth
cu f g' B L Nq Nc Ng Kp sc sq, sg dc dq, dg qc qq qg
(m) (kPa) (kPa) (m) (m) (kPa) (kPa) (kPa) (kPa) (ton/m2)
0 0.0 41.8 20.0 1 1 83.3 91.9 134.6 5.0 2.0 1.5 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 2019.6 2020 673 69
0.5 0.0 41.8 20.0 1 1 83.3 91.9 134.6 5.0 2.0 1.5 1.2 1.1 0.0 1389.4 2245.5 3635 1212 124
1 0.0 41.8 20.0 1 1 83.3 91.9 134.6 5.0 2.0 1.5 1.4 1.2 0.0 3058.3 2471.4 5530 1843 188
1.5 0.0 41.8 20.0 1 1 83.3 91.9 134.6 5.0 2.0 1.5 1.7 1.3 0.0 5006.8 2697.3 7704 2568 262
2 0.0 41.8 20.0 1 1 83.3 91.9 134.6 5.0 2.0 1.5 1.9 1.4 0.0 7234.8 2923.2 10158 3386 346
2.5 0.0 41.8 20.0 1 1 83.3 91.9 134.6 5.0 2.0 1.5 2.1 1.6 0.0 9742.4 3149.1 12892 4297 438
3 0.0 41.8 20.0 1 1 83.3 91.9 134.6 5.0 2.0 1.5 2.3 1.7 0.0 12529.6 3375.0 15905 5302 541
0 0.0 41.8 20.0 2 2 83.3 91.9 134.6 5.0 2.0 1.5 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 4039.2 4039 1346 137
0.5 0.0 41.8 20.0 2 2 83.3 91.9 134.6 5.0 2.0 1.5 1.1 1.1 0.0 1319.5 4265.1 5585 1862 190
1 0.0 41.8 20.0 2 2 83.3 91.9 134.6 5.0 2.0 1.5 1.2 1.1 0.0 2778.8 4491.0 7270 2423 247
1.5 0.0 41.8 20.0 2 2 83.3 91.9 134.6 5.0 2.0 1.5 1.3 1.2 0.0 4377.8 4716.9 9095 3032 309
2 0.0 41.8 20.0 2 2 83.3 91.9 134.6 5.0 2.0 1.5 1.4 1.2 0.0 6116.6 4942.8 11059 3686 376
2.5 0.0 41.8 20.0 2 2 83.3 91.9 134.6 5.0 2.0 1.5 1.6 1.3 0.0 7995.2 5168.7 13164 4388 448
3 0.0 41.8 20.0 2 2 83.3 91.9 134.6 5.0 2.0 1.5 1.7 1.3 0.0 10013.6 5394.6 15408 5136 524
0 0.0 41.8 20.0 3 3 83.3 91.9 134.6 5.0 2.0 1.5 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 6058.8 6059 2020 206
0.5 0.0 41.8 20.0 3 3 83.3 91.9 134.6 5.0 2.0 1.5 1.1 1.0 0.0 1296.2 6284.7 7581 2527 258
1 0.0 41.8 20.0 3 3 83.3 91.9 134.6 5.0 2.0 1.5 1.1 1.1 0.0 2685.6 6510.6 9196 3065 313
1.5 0.0 41.8 20.0 3 3 83.3 91.9 134.6 5.0 2.0 1.5 1.2 1.1 0.0 4168.2 6736.5 10905 3635 371
2 0.0 41.8 20.0 3 3 83.3 91.9 134.6 5.0 2.0 1.5 1.3 1.1 0.0 5743.9 6962.4 12706 4235 432
2 of 4

Project Soil Data
10 MW
Client PT. TRUBA JAYA ENGINEERINGRecommendation
BH-01
(Meyerhoff 1963)
(Meyerhoff 1963)
(Meyerhoff 1963)
q allowable
q allowable
q ultimate
(SF=3)
(SF=3)
Depth
2.5 0.0 41.8 20.0 3 3 83.3 91.9 134.6 5.0 2.0 1.5 1.4 1.2 0.0 7412.8 7188.3 14601 4867 497
3 0.0 41.8 20.0 3 3 83.3 91.9 134.6 5.0 2.0 1.5 1.4 1.2 0.0 9175.0 7414.2 16589 5530 564

0 100 200 300 400 500 600
0
0.5
1 1x1m
Depth (m)
2x2m
1.5
3x3m
2
2.5
3
3 of 4

Project Soil Data
10 MW
Client Recommendation
PT. TRUBA JAYA ENGINEERING
BH-02
(Meyerhoff 1963)
(Meyerhoff 1963)
(Meyerhoff 1963)
q allowable
q allowable
q ultimate
(SF=3)
(SF=3)
Depth
0 22.5 0.0 18.5 1 1 1.0 5.7 0.0 1.0 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.0 153.9 0.0 0.0 154 51 5
0.5 22.5 0.0 18.5 1 1 1.0 5.7 0.0 1.0 1.2 1.0 1.1 1.0 169.3 9.3 0.0 179 60 6
1 22.5 0.0 18.5 1 1 1.0 5.7 0.0 1.0 1.2 1.0 1.2 1.0 184.7 18.5 0.0 203 68 7
1.5 0.0 39.7 19.0 1 1 61.9 73.3 89.1 4.5 1.9 1.5 1.6 1.3 0.0 3387.8 1624.8 5013 1671 170
2 0.0 39.7 19.0 1 1 61.9 73.3 89.1 4.5 1.9 1.5 1.9 1.4 0.0 4881.8 1756.0 6638 2213 226
2.5 0.0 39.7 19.0 1 1 61.9 73.3 89.1 4.5 1.9 1.5 2.1 1.5 0.0 6558.3 1887.2 8446 2815 287
3 0.0 39.7 19.0 1 1 61.9 73.3 89.1 4.5 1.9 1.5 2.3 1.6 0.0 8417.2 2018.5 10436 3479 355
0 22.5 0.0 18.5 2 2 1.0 5.7 0.0 1.0 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.0 153.9 0.0 0.0 154 51 5
0.5 22.5 0.0 18.5 2 2 1.0 5.7 0.0 1.0 1.2 1.0 1.1 1.0 161.6 9.3 0.0 171 57 6
1 22.5 0.0 18.5 2 2 1.0 5.7 0.0 1.0 1.2 1.0 1.1 1.0 169.3 18.5 0.0 188 63 6
1.5 0.0 39.7 19.0 2 2 61.9 73.3 89.1 4.5 1.9 1.5 1.3 1.2 0.0 2977.3 2855.9 5833 1944 198
2 0.0 39.7 19.0 2 2 61.9 73.3 89.1 4.5 1.9 1.5 1.4 1.2 0.0 4152.2 2987.1 7139 2380 243
2.5 0.0 39.7 19.0 2 2 61.9 73.3 89.1 4.5 1.9 1.5 1.5 1.3 0.0 5418.2 3118.3 8537 2846 290
3 0.0 39.7 19.0 2 2 61.9 73.3 89.1 4.5 1.9 1.5 1.6 1.3 0.0 6775.5 3249.6 10025 3342 341
0 22.5 0.0 18.5 3 3 1.0 5.7 0.0 1.0 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.0 153.9 0.0 0.0 154 51 5
0.5 22.5 0.0 18.5 3 3 1.0 5.7 0.0 1.0 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.0 159.0 9.3 0.0 168 56 6
1 22.5 0.0 18.5 3 3 1.0 5.7 0.0 1.0 1.2 1.0 1.1 1.0 164.2 18.5 0.0 183 61 6
1.5 0.0 39.7 19.0 3 3 61.9 73.3 89.1 4.5 1.9 1.5 1.2 1.1 0.0 2840.5 4087.0 6928 2309 236
2 0.0 39.7 19.0 3 3 61.9 73.3 89.1 4.5 1.9 1.5 1.3 1.1 0.0 3909.0 4218.2 8127 2709 276
4 of 4

Project Soil Data
10 MW
Client Recommendation
PT. TRUBA JAYA ENGINEERING
BH-02
(Meyerhoff 1963)
(Meyerhoff 1963)
(Meyerhoff 1963)
q allowable
q allowable
q ultimate
(SF=3)
(SF=3)
Depth
2.5 0.0 39.7 19.0 3 3 61.9 73.3 89.1 4.5 1.9 1.5 1.4 1.2 0.0 5038.2 4349.4 9388 3129 319
3 0.0 39.7 19.0 3 3 61.9 73.3 89.1 4.5 1.9 1.5 1.4 1.2 0.0 6228.3 4480.7 10709 3570 364

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
0
0.5
1
Depth (m)
1x1m
1.5
2x2m
2 3x3m
2.5
3
LIQUEFCTION POTENTIAL ASSESMENT
PROJECT TRUBA SCATTER
LOCATION ALOR BH-01
A. DETAIL ASSESMENT (YOUD et al,2001)
amax 0.582 g
Mw 7.5 MSF 1.00
Borehole BH-01
GWL 1.7 m
Soil svo' Fines
Depth Type gn(kPa) svo (kPa) (kPa) rd CSR NSPT Cn Cr Cs (N1)60 Content a b (N1)60CS CRR7.5 Ks Factor Safety
0 SAND 20
2 SAND 20 40 20 0.99 0.747 31 1.6 0.75 1.2 44 0 0 1 44 2.000 0.3 2.000
4 SAND 20 80 40 0.97 0.736 34 1.4 0.85 1.2 48 0 0 1 48 2.000 0.5 2.000
6 SAND 20 120 60 0.96 0.725 50 1.2 0.95 1.2 70 0 0 1 70 2.000 0.7 2.000
8 SAND 20 160 80 0.94 0.709 40 1.1 0.95 1.2 50 0 0 1 50 2.000 0.9 2.000
10 SAND 20 200 100 0.90 0.685 40 1 0.95 1.2 46 0 0 1 46 2.000 1 2.000
12 SAND 18 236 116 0.86 0.659 26 0.9 1 1.2 29 0 0 1 29 0.414 1.1 0.697
14 SAND 18 272 132 0.79 0.619 13 0.9 1 1.2 14 0 0 1 14 0.146 1.2 0.287
16 SAND 18 308 148 0.73 0.573 17 0.8 1 1.2 17 0 0 1 17 0.178 1.3 0.409
18 SAND 18 344 164 0.67 0.529 25 0.8 1 1.2 23 0 0 1 23 0.261 1.4 0.696
20 SAND 18 380 180 0.62 0.494 25 0.7 1 1.2 22 0 0 1 22 0.242 1.5 0.740
22 SAND 18 416 196 0.58 0.466 36 0.7 1 1.2 30 0 0 1 30 2.000 1.6 2.000
24 SAND 19.5 455 215 0.55 0.443 36 0.7 1 1.2 28 0 0 1 28 0.383 1.7 1.480
26 SAND 19.5 494 234 0.53 0.424 41 0.6 1 1.2 31 0 0 1 31 2.000 1.8 2.000
28 SAND 19.5 533 253 0.51 0.410 34 0.6 1 1.2 24 0 0 1 24 0.275 1.9 1.281
30 SAND 19.5 572 272 0.50 0.399 33 0.6 1 1.2 22 0 0 1 22 0.245 2 1.238
B. GRAPHS
NSPT CSR & CRR Safety Factor (BH13)

0 10 20 30 0.000 0.500 1.000 1.500 2.000 0.000 0.500 1.000 1.500 2.000
0 0 0
5 5 5
10 10 10
15 15 15
20 20 20
25 25 25
30 30 CSR 30
CRR 7.5
35 35 GWL 35
LIQUEFCTION POTENTIAL ASSESMENT
PROJECT TRUBA SCATTER
LOCATION ALOR BH-02
A. DETAIL ASSESMENT (YOUD et al,2001)
amax 0.582 g
Mw 7.5 MSF 1.00
Borehole BH-02
GWL 1.4 m
Soil svo' Fines
Depth Type gn(kPa) svo (kPa) (kPa) rd CSR NSPT Cn Cr Cs (N1)60 Content a b (N1)60CS CRR7.5 Ks Factor Safety
0 SAND 19
2 SAND 19 38 18 0.99 0.788 31 1.6 0.75 1.2 44 0 0 1 44 2.000 0.3 2.000
4 SAND 19 76 36 0.97 0.777 16 1.4 0.85 1.2 23 0 0 1 23 0.257 0.5 0.162
6 SAND 19 114 54 0.96 0.765 19 1.3 0.95 1.2 27 0 0 1 27 0.350 0.6 0.297
8 SAND 19 152 72 0.94 0.748 27 1.1 0.95 1.2 35 0 0 1 35 2.000 0.8 2.000
10 SAND 19 190 90 0.90 0.723 40 1 0.95 1.2 48 0 0 1 48 2.000 0.9 2.000
12 SAND 19 228 108 0.86 0.684 24 1 1 1.2 28 0 0 1 28 0.362 1.1 0.559
14 SAND 19 266 126 0.79 0.634 50 0.9 1 1.2 54 0 0 1 54 2.000 1.2 2.000
16 SAND 19 304 144 0.73 0.581 20 0.8 1 1.2 20 0 0 1 20 0.215 1.3 0.478
18 SAND 19 342 162 0.67 0.533 42 0.8 1 1.2 39 0 0 1 39 2.000 1.4 2.000
20 CLAY 19 380 180 0.62 0.494 25 0.7 1 1.2 22 0 0 1 22 2.000 1.5 2.000
22 CLAY 19 418 198 0.58 0.464 21 0.7 1 1.2 17 0 0 1 17 2.000 1.6 2.000
24 CLAY 19 456 216 0.55 0.441 28 0.7 1 1.2 22 0 0 1 22 2.000 1.7 2.000
26 CLAY 19 494 234 0.53 0.424 50 0.6 1 1.2 37 0 0 1 37 2.000 1.8 2.000
28 CLAY 19 532 252 0.51 0.411 26 0.6 1 1.2 18 0 0 1 18 2.000 1.9 2.000
30 CLAY 19 570 270 0.50 0.400 15 0.6 1 1.2 10 0 0 1 10 2.000 2 2.000
B. GRAPHS
NSPT CSR & CRR Safety Factor (BH13)

0 10 20 30 0.000 0.500 1.000 1.500 2.000 0.000 0.500 1.000 1.500 2.000
0 0 0
5 5 5
10 10 10
15 15 15
20 20 20
25 25 25
30 30 CSR 30
CRR 7.5
35 35 GWL 35
Lateral Pile Deflection and Moment Subject to Lateral Forces METHOD Diameter of Pile 0.4 m EI 23325.6639 kNm2
FREE & FIX
Project Soil Investigation PLTMG ALOR 10 MW FHWA NHI 05 042, COM624 MANUAL, Type Concrete Spun Depth Pile m
HEAD
Location Desa Fanating, Teluk Mutiara, Alor, NTT P-y, Finite Difference fc' 49 Mpa BH-01
Max Deflection 10mm (freehead) Max Deflection 15mm (freehead) Cracking Moment Freehead Cracking Moment Fixhead
Bending Bending Bending Bending
Deflection Moment Deflection Moment Deflection Moment Deflection Moment
Depth (m) (mm) (kNm) Depth (m) (mm) (kNm) Depth (m) (mm) (kNm) Depth (m) (mm) (kNm)
0.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 15.00 0.00 0.00 5.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 -55.00
-0.68 5.51 61.15 -0.68 8.54 80.26 -0.68 2.86 41.98 -0.68 0.35 -22.45
-1.35 2.14 85.32 -1.35 3.58 116.62 -1.35 0.95 55.00 -1.35 0.24 -1.35
-2.03 0.38 66.02 -2.03 0.80 97.61 -2.03 0.07 36.82 -2.03 0.08 5.14
-2.70 -0.14 26.18 -2.70 -0.14 44.59 -2.70 -0.11 10.67 -2.70 0.00 3.29
-3.38 -0.11 1.43 -3.38 -0.17 5.41 -3.38 -0.06 -1.12 -3.38 -0.01 0.73
-4.05 -0.03 -3.42 -4.05 -0.05 -4.52 -4.05 -0.01 -2.11 -4.05 0.00 -0.19
-4.73 0.00 -1.49 -4.73 0.00 -2.46 -4.73 0.00 -0.65 -4.73 0.00 -0.17
-5.40 0.00 -0.08 -5.40 0.01 -0.26 -5.40 0.00 0.05 -5.40 0.00 -0.03
-6.08 0.00 0.15 -6.08 0.00 0.20 -6.08 0.00 0.09 -6.08 0.00 0.01
-6.75 0.00 0.05 -6.75 0.00 0.08 -6.75 0.00 0.02 -6.75 0.00 0.01
-7.43 0.00 0.00 -7.43 0.00 0.00 -7.43 0.00 0.00 -7.43 0.00 0.00
-8.10 0.00 -0.01 -8.10 0.00 -0.01 -8.10 0.00 0.00 -8.10 0.00 0.00
-8.78 0.00 0.00 -8.78 0.00 0.00 -8.78 0.00 0.00 -8.78 0.00 0.00
-9.45 0.00 0.00 -9.45 0.00 0.00 -9.45 0.00 0.00 -9.45 0.00 0.00
-10.13 0.00 0.00 -10.13 0.00 0.00 -10.13 0.00 0.00 -10.13 0.00 0.00
-10.80 0.00 0.00 -10.80 0.00 0.00 -10.80 0.00 0.00 -10.80 0.00 0.00
-11.48 0.00 0.00 -11.48 0.00 0.00 -11.48 0.00 0.00 -11.48 0.00 0.00
-12.15 0.00 0.00 -12.15 0.00 0.00 -12.15 0.00 0.00 -12.15 0.00 0.00
-12.83 0.00 0.00 -12.83 0.00 0.00 -12.83 0.00 0.00 -12.83 0.00 0.00
-13.50 0.00 0.00 -13.50 0.00 0.00 -13.50 0.00 0.00 -13.50 0.00 0.00
-14.18 0.00 0.00 -14.18 0.00 0.00 -14.18 0.00 0.00 -14.18 0.00 0.00
-14.85 0.00 0.00 -14.85 0.00 0.00 -14.85 0.00 0.00 -14.85 0.00 0.00
-15.53 0.00 0.00 -15.53 0.00 0.00 -15.53 0.00 0.00 -15.53 0.00 0.00
-16.20 0.00 0.00 -16.20 0.00 0.00 -16.20 0.00 0.00 -16.20 0.00 0.00
-16.88 0.00 0.00 -16.88 0.00 0.00 -16.88 0.00 0.00 -16.88 0.00 0.00
-17.55 0.00 0.00 -17.55 0.00 0.00 -17.55 0.00 0.00 -17.55 0.00 0.00
-18.23 0.00 0.00 -18.23 0.00 0.00 -18.23 0.00 0.00 -18.23 0.00 0.00
-18.90 0.00 0.00 -18.90 0.00 0.00 -18.90 0.00 0.00 -18.90 0.00 0.00
-19.58 0.00 0.00 -19.58 0.00 0.00 -19.58 0.00 0.00 -19.58 0.00 0.00
-20.25 0.00 0.00 -20.25 0.00 0.00 -20.25 0.00 0.00 -20.25 0.00 0.00
-20.93 0.00 0.00 -20.93 0.00 0.00 -20.93 0.00 0.00 -20.93 0.00 0.00
-21.60 0.00 0.00 -21.60 0.00 0.00 -21.60 0.00 0.00 -21.60 0.00 0.00
-22.28 0.00 0.00 -22.28 0.00 0.00 -22.28 0.00 0.00 -22.28 0.00 0.00
-22.95 0.00 0.00 -22.95 0.00 0.00 -22.95 0.00 0.00 -22.95 0.00 0.00
-23.63 0.00 0.00 -23.63 0.00 0.00 -23.63 0.00 0.00 -23.63 0.00 0.00
-24.30 0.00 0.00 -24.30 0.00 0.00 -24.30 0.00 0.00 -24.30 0.00 0.00
-24.98 0.00 0.00 -24.98 0.00 0.00 -24.98 0.00 0.00 -24.98 0.00 0.00
-25.65 0.00 0.00 -25.65 0.00 0.00 -25.65 0.00 0.00 -25.65 0.00 0.00
-26.33 0.00 0.00 -26.33 0.00 0.00 -26.33 0.00 0.00 -26.33 0.00 0.00
-27.00 0.00 0.00 -27.00 0.00 0.00 -27.00 0.00 0.00 -27.00 0.00 0.00
Deflection Curve (mm)
0.00
-2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
-5.00
-10.00
Max Deflection 10mm (freehead)

-15.00
Cracking Moment Freehead
Cracking Moment Fixhead
-20.00
-25.00
-30.00
Bending Moment Curve (kNm)
0.00
-80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
-5.00
-10.00

-15.00
-20.00
-25.00
-30.00
Lateral Pile Deflection and Moment Subject to Lateral Forces METHOD Diameter of Pile 0.4 m EI 23325.6639 kNm2
FREE & FIX
Project Soil Investigation PLTMG ALOR 10 MW FHWA NHI 05 042, COM624 MANUAL, Type Concrete Spun Depth Pile m
HEAD
Location Desa Fanating, Teluk Mutiara, Alor, NTT P-y, Finite Difference fc' 49 Mpa BH-02
Max Deflection 10mm (freehead) Max Deflection 15mm (freehead) Cracking Moment Freehead Cracking Moment Fixhead
Bending Bending Bending Bending
Deflection Moment Deflection Moment Deflection Moment Deflection Moment
Depth (m) (mm) (kNm) Depth (m) (mm) (kNm) Depth (m) (mm) (kNm) Depth (m) (mm) (kNm)
0.00 10.11 0.00 0.00 15.00 0.00 0.00 7.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 -55.00
-0.80 5.57 43.05 -0.80 8.51 56.52 -0.80 3.89 37.95 -0.80 0.50 -24.04
-1.60 2.16 62.32 -1.60 3.52 85.00 -1.60 1.26 55.00 -1.60 0.32 -1.19
-2.40 0.38 48.87 -2.40 0.75 71.82 -2.40 0.06 37.65 -2.40 0.08 6.81
-3.20 -0.10 17.72 -3.20 -0.11 30.29 -3.20 -0.13 8.53 -3.20 -0.01 3.03
-4.00 -0.07 -0.65 -4.00 -0.11 1.11 -4.00 -0.04 -2.51 -4.00 -0.01 0.09
-4.80 -0.01 -2.05 -4.80 -0.01 -3.13 -4.80 0.00 -1.57 -4.80 0.00 -0.28
-5.60 0.00 -0.33 -5.60 0.01 -0.72 -5.60 0.00 -0.08 -5.60 0.00 -0.06
-6.40 0.00 0.11 -6.40 0.00 0.14 -6.40 0.00 0.11 -6.40 0.00 0.01
-7.20 0.00 0.04 -7.20 0.00 0.07 -7.20 0.00 0.02 -7.20 0.00 0.01
-8.00 0.00 0.00 -8.00 0.00 0.00 -8.00 0.00 -0.01 -8.00 0.00 0.00
-8.80 0.00 0.00 -8.80 0.00 0.00 -8.80 0.00 0.00 -8.80 0.00 0.00
-9.60 0.00 0.00 -9.60 0.00 0.00 -9.60 0.00 0.00 -9.60 0.00 0.00
-10.40 0.00 0.00 -10.40 0.00 0.00 -10.40 0.00 0.00 -10.40 0.00 0.00
-11.20 0.00 0.00 -11.20 0.00 0.00 -11.20 0.00 0.00 -11.20 0.00 0.00
-12.00 0.00 0.00 -12.00 0.00 0.00 -12.00 0.00 0.00 -12.00 0.00 0.00
-12.80 0.00 0.00 -12.80 0.00 0.00 -12.80 0.00 0.00 -12.80 0.00 0.00
-13.60 0.00 0.00 -13.60 0.00 0.00 -13.60 0.00 0.00 -13.60 0.00 0.00
-14.40 0.00 0.00 -14.40 0.00 0.00 -14.40 0.00 0.00 -14.40 0.00 0.00
-15.20 0.00 0.00 -15.20 0.00 0.00 -15.20 0.00 0.00 -15.20 0.00 0.00
-16.00 0.00 0.00 -16.00 0.00 0.00 -16.00 0.00 0.00 -16.00 0.00 0.00
-16.80 0.00 0.00 -16.80 0.00 0.00 -16.80 0.00 0.00 -16.80 0.00 0.00
-17.60 0.00 0.00 -17.60 0.00 0.00 -17.60 0.00 0.00 -17.60 0.00 0.00
-18.40 0.00 0.00 -18.40 0.00 0.00 -18.40 0.00 0.00 -18.40 0.00 0.00
-19.20 0.00 0.00 -19.20 0.00 0.00 -19.20 0.00 0.00 -19.20 0.00 0.00
-20.00 0.00 0.00 -20.00 0.00 0.00 -20.00 0.00 0.00 -20.00 0.00 0.00
-20.80 0.00 0.00 -20.80 0.00 0.00 -20.80 0.00 0.00 -20.80 0.00 0.00
-21.60 0.00 0.00 -21.60 0.00 0.00 -21.60 0.00 0.00 -21.60 0.00 0.00
-22.40 0.00 0.00 -22.40 0.00 0.00 -22.40 0.00 0.00 -22.40 0.00 0.00
-23.20 0.00 0.00 -23.20 0.00 0.00 -23.20 0.00 0.00 -23.20 0.00 0.00
-24.00 0.00 0.00 -24.00 0.00 0.00 -24.00 0.00 0.00 -24.00 0.00 0.00
-24.80 0.00 0.00 -24.80 0.00 0.00 -24.80 0.00 0.00 -24.80 0.00 0.00
-25.60 0.00 0.00 -25.60 0.00 0.00 -25.60 0.00 0.00 -25.60 0.00 0.00
-26.40 0.00 0.00 -26.40 0.00 0.00 -26.40 0.00 0.00 -26.40 0.00 0.00
-27.20 0.00 0.00 -27.20 0.00 0.00 -27.20 0.00 0.00 -27.20 0.00 0.00
-28.00 0.00 0.00 -28.00 0.00 0.00 -28.00 0.00 0.00 -28.00 0.00 0.00
-28.80 0.00 0.00 -28.80 0.00 0.00 -28.80 0.00 0.00 -28.80 0.00 0.00
-29.60 0.00 0.00 -29.60 0.00 0.00 -29.60 0.00 0.00 -29.60 0.00 0.00
-30.40 0.00 0.00 -30.40 0.00 0.00 -30.40 0.00 0.00 -30.40 0.00 0.00
-31.20 0.00 0.00 -31.20 0.00 0.00 -31.20 0.00 0.00 -31.20 0.00 0.00
-32.00 0.00 0.00 -32.00 0.00 0.00 -32.00 0.00 0.00 -32.00 0.00 0.00
Deflection Curve (mm)
0.00
-2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
-5.00
-10.00
-15.00
-20.00
-25.00
-30.00
-35.00
Bending Moment Curve (kNm)
0.00
-80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100
-5.00
-10.00
-15.00
-20.00
-25.00
-30.00
-35.00
PHOTO DOCUMENTATION
PROJECT : SOIL INVESTIGATION PLTMG ALOR10 MW
LOCATION
CLIENT
:
:
DESA FANATING, TELUK MUTIARA, ALOR, NTT
TRUBA JAYA ENGINEERING
BH-01
Drilling Activity Drilling Activity
Drilling Activity SPT Activity
SPT Activity SPT Activity

LOCATION
CLIENT
:
:
BH-01
Depths 0 - 5 m
Depths 5 - 10 m
Depths 10 - 15 m
Depths 15 - 20 m
Depths 20 - 25 m
CORE BOXES
LOCATION
CLIENT
:
:
BH-01
Depths 25 - 30 m
Depths 30 - 35 m
Depths 35 - 40 m
CORE BOXES
PHOTO DOCUMENTATION
LOCATION
CLIENT
:
:
BH-02
Drilling Activity Drilling Activity
Drilling Activity SPT Activity
SPT Activity SPT Activity

LOCATION
CLIENT
:
:
BH-02
Depths 0 - 5 m
Depths 5 - 10 m
Depths 10 - 15 m
Depths 15 - 20 m
Depths 20 - 25 m
CORE BOXES
LOCATION
CLIENT
:
:
BH-02
Depths 25 - 30 m
Depths 30 - 35 m
Depths 35 - 40 m
CORE BOXES
PHOTO DOCUMENTATION
LOCATION
CLIENT
:
:
CPT
S-01 S-01
S-02 S-02
S-03 S-03
PHOTO DOCUMENTATION
LOCATION
CLIENT
:
:
CPT
S-04 S-04
PHOTO DOCUMENTATION
LOCATION
CLIENT
:
:
RESISTIVITY
SR-01 SR-01
SR-02 SR-02
SR-03 SR-03
PHOTO DOCUMENTATION
LOCATION
CLIENT
:
:
RESISTIVITY
SR-04 SR-04
SR-05 SR-05
SR-06 SR-06

Report of Soil Investigation-Approve PDF

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originaltitel

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Report of Soil Investigation-Approve PDF

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

REPORT OF SOIL INVESTIGATION

Issued 20-JUN-18 Doc No : T3139-ALO-ENG-CVL-STU-0002 Rev.2 Page2of59

REVISION HISTORICAL SHEET

Rev No Date Description

0 12/04/18 Issued for Approval

Issued 20-JUN-18 Doc No : T3139-ALO-ENG-CVL-STU-0002 Rev.2 Page3of59

TABLE OF CONTENTS .........................................................................................................3

Issued 20-JUN-18 Doc No : T3139-ALO-ENG-CVL-STU-0002 Rev.2 Page4of59

4.3 Subsurface Characterization .................................................................................................... 30

Issued 20-JUN-18 Doc No : T3139-ALO-ENG-CVL-STU-0002 Rev.2 Page5of59

APPENDIX.A SITE MAP

Issued 20-JUN-18 Doc No : T3139-ALO-ENG-CVL-STU-0002 Rev.2 Page6of59

Table 1-1 Performance Dates of Works ............................................................................................. 9

Issued 20-JUN-18 Doc No : T3139-ALO-ENG-CVL-STU-0002 Rev.2 Page7of59

Figure 1-1 Project Location ................................................................................................................ 9

Issued 20-JUN-18 Doc No : T3139-ALO-ENG-CVL-STU-0002 Rev.2 Page8of59

This investigation includes:

1.2 Project Location

Issued 20-JUN-18 Doc No : T3139-ALO-ENG-CVL-STU-0002 Rev.2 Page9of59

Figure 1-1 Project Location

1.3 Performance of Project

Table 1-1 Performance Dates of Works

BH-01 40.27 March 26, 2018 April 6, 2018

Point ID Hole Depth (m) Date Started

S-01 2 March 7, 2018

Issued 20-JUN-18 Doc No : T3139-ALO-ENG-CVL-STU-0002 Rev.2 Page10of59

1.5 Structure of Report

Issued 20-JUN-18 Doc No : T3139-ALO-ENG-CVL-STU-0002 Rev.2 Page11of59

Table 2-1 Actual Scope of Works Done

No DESCRIPTION UNIT Qty

1 Mobilization & Demobilization LS 1

III LABORATORY TEST

Issued 20-JUN-18 Doc No : T3139-ALO-ENG-CVL-STU-0002 Rev.2 Page12of59

No DESCRIPTION UNIT Qty

2.2 Personnel and Equipment

Table 2-2 Equipment Mobilized

Equipment Manufacturer Number Unit Standard Used

Issued 20-JUN-18 Doc No : T3139-ALO-ENG-CVL-STU-0002 Rev.2 Page13of59

Equipment Manufacturer Number Unit Standard Used

The following personnel were mobilized:

Table 2-3 Personnel Performed

NO NAME JOB DESC.

Issued 20-JUN-18 Doc No : T3139-ALO-ENG-CVL-STU-0002 Rev.2 Page14of59

2.3.1 Soil Investigation Works

2.3.1.1 Exploratory Drilling

Issued 20-JUN-18 Doc No : T3139-ALO-ENG-CVL-STU-0002 Rev.2 Page15of59

Figure 2-1 Geotechnical Drilling With Rotary Drilling Rig

2.3.1.2 Standard Penetration Test (SPT)

Issued 20-JUN-18 Doc No : T3139-ALO-ENG-CVL-STU-0002 Rev.2 Page16of59

Figure 2-2 ASTM SPT Sampler

Standard penetration tests have been done following ASTM D 1586-97.

Issued 20-JUN-18 Doc No : T3139-ALO-ENG-CVL-STU-0002 Rev.2 Page17of59

Figure 2-3 SPT Hammer Types

2.3.1.3 Undisturbed Sampling

Issued 20-JUN-18 Doc No : T3139-ALO-ENG-CVL-STU-0002 Rev.2 Page18of59

Figure 2-4 UDS Sampler Size

Outside diameter (Do) = 2”/50.8 mm

2.3.1.4 Dutch Cone Penetration Test (DCPT/Sondir)

Issued 20-JUN-18 Doc No : T3139-ALO-ENG-CVL-STU-0002 Rev.2 Page19of59

Figure 2-5 Standard Begeman Mechanical Cone

2.3.1.5 Ground Water Level Observation

2.3.2 Laboratory Works

Issued 20-JUN-18 Doc No : T3139-ALO-ENG-CVL-STU-0002 Rev.2 Page20of59