0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
33 Ansichten1 Seite
This document contains instructions for a quiz on special proceedings for Ruth B. Bawayan's class at Cordillera Career Development College. Students are asked to read a Supreme Court decision on GR No. 181796 and answer three questions. The first question asks students to fully discuss how the Supreme Court resolved the appeal of the Petitioners in the case. The second asks students to fully differentiate between the writ of habeas corpus, writ of amparo, and writ of habeas data. The third asks students to distinguish between remedies for a change of name before administrative bodies versus courts. The document provides details on formatting the answers and ends by noting this concludes Quiz 2 Finals.
This document contains instructions for a quiz on special proceedings for Ruth B. Bawayan's class at Cordillera Career Development College. Students are asked to read a Supreme Court decision on GR No. 181796 and answer three questions. The first question asks students to fully discuss how the Supreme Court resolved the appeal of the Petitioners in the case. The second asks students to fully differentiate between the writ of habeas corpus, writ of amparo, and writ of habeas data. The third asks students to distinguish between remedies for a change of name before administrative bodies versus courts. The document provides details on formatting the answers and ends by noting this concludes Quiz 2 Finals.
This document contains instructions for a quiz on special proceedings for Ruth B. Bawayan's class at Cordillera Career Development College. Students are asked to read a Supreme Court decision on GR No. 181796 and answer three questions. The first question asks students to fully discuss how the Supreme Court resolved the appeal of the Petitioners in the case. The second asks students to fully differentiate between the writ of habeas corpus, writ of amparo, and writ of habeas data. The third asks students to distinguish between remedies for a change of name before administrative bodies versus courts. The document provides details on formatting the answers and ends by noting this concludes Quiz 2 Finals.
Second Semester, SY 2019 Ruth B. Bawayan, Instructor ruthbawayan.ccdc@gmail.com
READ the following en banc decision of the Supreme Court:
G.R. No. 181796 promulgated November 7, 2017
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, REPRESENTED BY THE
DIRECTOR/HEAD OF THE CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION AND DETECTION GROUP (CIDG), PHILIPPINE NATIONAL POLICE (PNP), Petitioner vs.REGINA N. CAYANAN AND SPOl ROLANDO V. PASCUA, Respondents https://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/nov2017/gr_181796_2017.html
Then, answer the following questions concisely, clearly and
completely. Observe spacing between questions, margins, correct punctuations, indentation and proper grammar.
1. How did the Supreme Court resolve the appeal of the Petitioners. Discuss fully. (10 points)
2. Differentiate the writ of habeas corpus, writ of amparo and writ
of habeas data. Discuss fully (10 points)
3. Distinguish the remedy of change of name before the
administrative bodies and before the court. (5 points)
--------------------------------END OF QUIZ 2 FINALS------------------------------