Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
G. L. BRIDGER1,
Dicalcium Phosphate Fertilizer by TEODORO I. HORZELLA2, and
KUANG H. LIN
Treatment of Phosphate Rock Department of Chemical
and Mining Engineering,
with Mineral Acids Iowa State College, Ames, Iowa
A process in which phosphate rock is made to react with mineral acids to produce a fer-
tilizer containing primarily dicalcium phosphate consists of refluxing a mixture of phos-
phate rock, water, and acid, followed by heating in an open container to 1 30° to 185° C.
Conversion to dicalcium phosphate in the product may be increased by adding water and
repeating the refluxing and heating steps. When phosphoric acid is used, the acidulation
required to produce the new product is only about 50% of that required for production
See https://pubs.acs.org/sharingguidelines for options on how to legitimately share published articles.
conditions of treatment.
POTENTIAL ADVANTAGES of a proc- normal superphosphate, the theoretical nation’s sulfur reserves would be greatly
THE
ess in which dicalcium phosphate acidulation ratio according to Equation extended, as the fertilizer industry is a
fertilizer could be produced by direct 1 is 2 moles of acid
per mole of phos- major consumer of sulfuric acid, which is
acidulation of phosphate rock with min- phorus pentoxide derived from rock required for normal superphosphate
eral acids have long been recognized phosphate (or available phosphorus manufacture and indirectly for triple
and much research has been directed to- pentoxide in the product). In practice superphosphate manufacture.
ward discovery of such a process. How- somewhat more acid is used—about 2.6
ever, previous investigators have not moles of acid per mole of rock phosphorus
Previous Investigations
found practical conditions under which pentoxide—because of side reactions
dicalcium phosphate could be prepared that take place between the acid and Many previous investigators {4-6)
by direct acidulation of phosphate calcium carbonate, calcium fluoride, have concluded that dicalcium phos-
rock. iron and aluminum compounds, and phate cannot be formed by treatment of
Theoretically the formation of dical- other constituents of the rock. If sul- phosphate rock with mineral acids.
cium phosphate by direct acidulation of furic acid could be made to produce Elmore and Farr {3) studied the hy-
phosphate rock with either sulfuric or dicalcium phosphate according to Equa- drolysis of monocalcium phosphate ac-
phosphoric acid would require only half as tion 2, the theoretical acidulation ratio cording to the following equation:
much acid to produce a unit of available would be only 1 mole of acid per mole of
phosphorus pentoxide as formation of rock phosphorus pentoxide (or available Ca(H2P04)2.H20 4- *H20 =
monocalcium phosphate, the principal phosphorus pentoxide in the product). CaHPOi 4- H3P04 4- {x + 1)H20 (5)
component of superphosphates. This is When phosphoric acid is used to pro-
illustrated by the following equations: duce triple superphosphate, the theoret- with the objective of utilizing the phos-
ical acidulation ratio according to phoric acid formed by this reaction to
T 6H2S04 4- 3H20
CaioF2(PC>4)6 =
Equation 3 is 2 moles of acid phosphorus react with phosphate rock and thereby
3Ca(H2P04)2.H20 4- 6CaS04 4- CaF2(l) pentoxide per mole of rock phosphorus achieving a substantial conversion to di-
Ca10F2(PO4)6 4- 3H2SC>4 = pentoxide or 2/3 mole of acid phosphorus calcium phosphate. It was not found
pentoxide per mole of available phos- possible to do this except by separation
6CaHP04 4- 3CaS04 4- CaF2 (2) phorus pentoxide in the product. In of the dicalcium phosphate from the
CaioF2(P04)s 4- 12H3P04 + 9H20 = practice about 2.3 moles of acid phos- dilute phosphoric acid by filtration, fol-
9Ca(H2P04)2.H20 4- CaF2 (3) phorus pentoxide per mole of rock phos- lowed by concentration of the acid and
phorus pentoxide is used because of side reaction with phosphate rock (6). Zbor-
Ca10F2(PO4)6 + 3H3PC)4 =
reactions. If phosphoric acid could be nik (7) patented a process in which phos-
9CaHP04 4- CaF2 (4) made to produce dicalcium phosphate phate rock, phosphoric acid, and water
according to Equation 4, the theoretical were autoclaved at about 100 pounds
Reactions 1 and 3 take place in the acidulation ratio would be only 0.5 mole per square inch and 200° C. to produce
manufacture of normal and triple super- of acid phosphorus pentoxide per mole a dicalcium phosphate product, but the
phosphate, respectively. Reactions 2 of rock phosphorus pentoxide or 0.33 process has never been adopted com-
and 4 do not occur appreciably under mole of acid phosphorus pentoxide per mercially because it requires high pres-
ordinary conditions of acidulation. mole of available phosphorus pentoxide sure operation.
When sulfuric acid is used to produce in the product.
One significant advantage of a direct
1
Present address, Davison Chemical Exploratory Experiments
Co., Baltimore, Md.
acidulation process for dicalcium phos-
2
Present address, Link-Belt Co., Chi- phate fertilizer, in addition to savings in A large number of exploratory experi-
cago, 111. acid requirements, would be that the ments were carried out in attempts to dis-
-60 +100 14
the monocalcium phosphate in the mixture c.p. monocalcium phosphate mono- -100 +150 15
to dicalcium phosphate and phosphoric -150 +200 25
acid. hydrate containing 56.0% phosphorus -200 +325 40
3. Heating the mixture without reflux pentoxide, and c.p. grades of phos- -325 5
in anopen container to a temperature of at phoric and sulfuric acids were used.
least 130° C. and preferably 185° C., _
, Phosphate rock, water,
1 '
A
Figure 1. Effect of conversion temperature in treatment of
phosphate rock and monocalcium phosphate
Acidulation ratio 1.0
sion temperature was80 minutes. Ad- of 95.8% was achieved at an acidulation carried out with a triple superphosphate
ditional time at this temperature im- ratio of 0.8. Further cycles would prob- made in the laboratory by mixing some
proved conversion only very slightly, ably have increased the conversion of the phosphate rock with 74% c.p.
but significantly decreased the water- slightly but not enough to be of prac- phosphoric acid at an acidulation ratio
soluble phosphorus pentoxide content tical interest. It appears that high con- of 2.3 moles of acid phosphorus pent-
and increased total and available phos- versions cannot be attained at still lower oxide per mole of rock phosphorus pent-
phorus pentoxide content, apparently acidulation ratios approaching the theo- oxide and curing at room temperature
through dehydration. Conversion time retical limit of 0.5; this is doubtless due until the moisture content of the product
is therefore another means of controlling to consumption of some of the acid by was 1.6%. This triple superphosphate
the proportion of water-soluble phos- the rock impurities and to the small pro- was then mixed with various proportions
phorus pentoxide in the product. portion of residual monocalcium phos- of phosphate rock and subjected to treat-
Experiments were phate monohydrate. ments in which a 30-minute hydrolysis
Effect of
Acidulation Ratio
made with various As expected, the water-soluble phos- time, a 185° C. conversion temperature,
proportions of phorus pentoxide content of the products and a 30-minute conversion time were
monocalcium phosphate monohydrate decreased with decreasing acidulation used. The results are shown in Table
and rock; a hydrolysis time of 1 hour, a ratio and with each cycle of treatment. IV. To achiteve high conversion (94%)
conversion temperature of 185 0 C., and a The proportion of available phosphorus in a single cycle, it was necessary to use an
conversion time of 30 minutes were used. pentoxide in the water-soluble form can acidulation ratio of 1.2 moles of acid
The free water content of the hydrolysis thus be controlled by the acidulation phosphorus pentoxide per mole of rock
mixture ranged from 12.4 to 19.6%, the ratio as well as by conversion time and phosphorus pentoxide. When an acidu-
largest proportion being used at the temperature. lation ratio of 1.1 was used, the same
lowest acidulation ratio. conversion could be obtained by using
The results are shown in Figure 2. two cycles. The necessity for higher
Reaction of Phosphate
For a single cycle the conversion to
Rock with Superphosphates
acidulation ratios than in the experiments
available phosphorus pentoxide de- with pure monocalcium phosphate was
creases sharply at acidulation ratios lower As normal and triple superphosphates due to the additional impurities from the
than 1.0 mole of acid phosphorus pent- are the cheapest sources of monocalcium triple superphosphate. The water-
oxide per mole of rock phosphorus pent- phosphate monohydrate, experiments soluble phosphorus pentoxide contents
oxide. Flowever, second cycle product were made in which these materials were of the products were lower than when
having a conversion of 97.3% was ob- made to react with phosphate rock by pure monocalcium phosphate was used.
tained at an acidulation ratio of 0.9 and the above process. In another series of experiments, a
third cycle product having a conversion The first series of experiments was commercial triple superphosphate made
ratio to 2.3 pounds of acid phosphorus tive, as its surface would be free of pre- mixing of rock, water, and acid, and
pentoxide per pound of rock phosphorus cipitated dicalcium phosphate. How- hydrolysis. The precuring was carried
pentoxide. The mixture was hydrolyzed ever, the results of these experiments, out at room temperature in closed flasks.
for 1.5 hours, the remainder of the rock which are not shown in detail, were not The results, which are not shown in detail,
was added, and the conversion step was significantly different from those in indicated that a 2-day precuring period
carried out at a temperature of 185° C. which all the rock was added at the was sufficient to give products equivalent
and a time of 30 minutes. It was thought same time. to those made from the laboratory triple
that by this procedure the rock added In the next series of experiments, vari- superphosphate. Products were made by
after hydrolysis might be more reac- ous precuring times were used between this procedure at three different acidu-