Sie sind auf Seite 1von 7

FERTILIZER MANUFACTURE

G. L. BRIDGER1,
Dicalcium Phosphate Fertilizer by TEODORO I. HORZELLA2, and
KUANG H. LIN
Treatment of Phosphate Rock Department of Chemical
and Mining Engineering,
with Mineral Acids Iowa State College, Ames, Iowa

A process in which phosphate rock is made to react with mineral acids to produce a fer-
tilizer containing primarily dicalcium phosphate consists of refluxing a mixture of phos-
phate rock, water, and acid, followed by heating in an open container to 1 30° to 185° C.
Conversion to dicalcium phosphate in the product may be increased by adding water and
repeating the refluxing and heating steps. When phosphoric acid is used, the acidulation
required to produce the new product is only about 50% of that required for production
See https://pubs.acs.org/sharingguidelines for options on how to legitimately share published articles.

of triple superphosphate, based on the phosphorus pentoxide content of the phosphate


rock, or about 75% based on the available phosphorus pentoxide content of the product.
When sulfuric acid is used, somewhat higher acidulation ratios are required because of the
interfering action of the calcium sulfate. The water-soluble phosphorus pentoxide
content of the product may be varied from a small to a large proportion of the total by
Downloaded via Junaid Qureshi on April 25, 2019 at 11:15:09 (UTC).

conditions of treatment.

POTENTIAL ADVANTAGES of a proc- normal superphosphate, the theoretical nation’s sulfur reserves would be greatly
THE
ess in which dicalcium phosphate acidulation ratio according to Equation extended, as the fertilizer industry is a
fertilizer could be produced by direct 1 is 2 moles of acid
per mole of phos- major consumer of sulfuric acid, which is
acidulation of phosphate rock with min- phorus pentoxide derived from rock required for normal superphosphate
eral acids have long been recognized phosphate (or available phosphorus manufacture and indirectly for triple
and much research has been directed to- pentoxide in the product). In practice superphosphate manufacture.
ward discovery of such a process. How- somewhat more acid is used—about 2.6
ever, previous investigators have not moles of acid per mole of rock phosphorus
Previous Investigations
found practical conditions under which pentoxide—because of side reactions
dicalcium phosphate could be prepared that take place between the acid and Many previous investigators {4-6)
by direct acidulation of phosphate calcium carbonate, calcium fluoride, have concluded that dicalcium phos-
rock. iron and aluminum compounds, and phate cannot be formed by treatment of
Theoretically the formation of dical- other constituents of the rock. If sul- phosphate rock with mineral acids.
cium phosphate by direct acidulation of furic acid could be made to produce Elmore and Farr {3) studied the hy-
phosphate rock with either sulfuric or dicalcium phosphate according to Equa- drolysis of monocalcium phosphate ac-
phosphoric acid would require only half as tion 2, the theoretical acidulation ratio cording to the following equation:
much acid to produce a unit of available would be only 1 mole of acid per mole of
phosphorus pentoxide as formation of rock phosphorus pentoxide (or available Ca(H2P04)2.H20 4- *H20 =

monocalcium phosphate, the principal phosphorus pentoxide in the product). CaHPOi 4- H3P04 4- {x + 1)H20 (5)
component of superphosphates. This is When phosphoric acid is used to pro-
illustrated by the following equations: duce triple superphosphate, the theoret- with the objective of utilizing the phos-
ical acidulation ratio according to phoric acid formed by this reaction to
T 6H2S04 4- 3H20
CaioF2(PC>4)6 =

Equation 3 is 2 moles of acid phosphorus react with phosphate rock and thereby
3Ca(H2P04)2.H20 4- 6CaS04 4- CaF2(l) pentoxide per mole of rock phosphorus achieving a substantial conversion to di-
Ca10F2(PO4)6 4- 3H2SC>4 = pentoxide or 2/3 mole of acid phosphorus calcium phosphate. It was not found
pentoxide per mole of available phos- possible to do this except by separation
6CaHP04 4- 3CaS04 4- CaF2 (2) phorus pentoxide in the product. In of the dicalcium phosphate from the
CaioF2(P04)s 4- 12H3P04 + 9H20 = practice about 2.3 moles of acid phos- dilute phosphoric acid by filtration, fol-
9Ca(H2P04)2.H20 4- CaF2 (3) phorus pentoxide per mole of rock phos- lowed by concentration of the acid and
phorus pentoxide is used because of side reaction with phosphate rock (6). Zbor-
Ca10F2(PO4)6 + 3H3PC)4 =
reactions. If phosphoric acid could be nik (7) patented a process in which phos-
9CaHP04 4- CaF2 (4) made to produce dicalcium phosphate phate rock, phosphoric acid, and water
according to Equation 4, the theoretical were autoclaved at about 100 pounds
Reactions 1 and 3 take place in the acidulation ratio would be only 0.5 mole per square inch and 200° C. to produce
manufacture of normal and triple super- of acid phosphorus pentoxide per mole a dicalcium phosphate product, but the
phosphate, respectively. Reactions 2 of rock phosphorus pentoxide or 0.33 process has never been adopted com-
and 4 do not occur appreciably under mole of acid phosphorus pentoxide per mercially because it requires high pres-
ordinary conditions of acidulation. mole of available phosphorus pentoxide sure operation.
When sulfuric acid is used to produce in the product.
One significant advantage of a direct
1
Present address, Davison Chemical Exploratory Experiments
Co., Baltimore, Md.
acidulation process for dicalcium phos-
2
Present address, Link-Belt Co., Chi- phate fertilizer, in addition to savings in A large number of exploratory experi-
cago, 111. acid requirements, would be that the ments were carried out in attempts to dis-

VOL. 4, NO. 4, APRIL 1956


cover conditions under which dicalcium rock from step 3 largely into dicalcium perature sufficient to cause gentle boiling
phosphate could be formed by direct phosphate. The entire cycle may be of the mixture in the flask; the oil bath
reaction between phosphate rock and repeated as many times as desired, with a temperature was generally 120° to
smaller degree of conversion taking place
phosphoric or sulfuric acid. Because each time, but in practice, the conversion
125° C. and the boiling temperature of
monocalcium phosphate is usually the the mixture was usually 110° to 115° C.
attained with only one or two cycles is
first product of reaction between phos- The mixer was operated at a moderate
probably sufficient from an economical
phate rock and either acid, studies were point of view. speed. Most of the mixtures varied in
also made to discover conditions under consistency from very thick slurries to
which reactions could be effected be- After the general procedure had been pasty masses at room temperature, but
tween monocalcium phosphate and phos- on heating they became thin slurries
established, experiments were carried out
phate rock. Conditions were explored to determine the optimum conditions. which were easily agitated.
under which monocalcium phosphate After completion of the refluxing,
would be hydrolyzed according to Reac- the condenser was removed and the
tion 5 to a large extent and new condi- Materials and Procedure open flask was placed in a second oil
tions were then imposed to promote reac- bath heated to the desired conversion
tion between the phosphate rock and A Florida phosphate rock was used
which had the following percentage com- temperature. Agitation during the con-
phosphoric acid according to Equation version step was not used for most of the
3. It is seen that if Reactions 5 and 3 position on a dry basis. experiments, because the slurry soon be-
could be made to take place alternately came too thick to be mixed by the labora-
or simultaneously, substantially complete p«o5 33.2 tory mixer. When the temperature of the
conversion of the phosphorus pentoxide Citrate-insoluble P2O5 29.4 material approached the desired conver-
CaO 47.8
in phosphate rock to dicalcium phos- 0.4 sion temperature, the heat input to the
MgO
phate could be effected, the net result of AI2O3 1.3 bath was reduced; otherwise the flask
which would be substantially equivalent Fe2Os 1.1 temperature would exceed the bath tem-
to Reaction 4. SiO, 9.1
F 3.80 perature by as much as 20° C. because of
the exothermic reaction in this step.
A procedure was evolved by which The material was held at the desired con-
this can be carried out.
The screen analysis (per cent) of the version temperature for a specified
phosphate rock was as follows: period, then was removed, allowed to
1. Mixing phosphate rock with mono-
calcium phosphate and water, or with cool, and ground in a Micro-Samplmill
with a screen having herringbone slots
phosphoric or sulfuric acid and water, in a 0.3
+ 60 mesh of 0.013-inch opening. A typical par-
proportion such as to convert only part of -60 +100 10.3
the phosphate rock into monocalcium ticle size of the product after grinding
-100 +150 11 .4
phosphate. -150 +200 22.8 was as follows (per cent):
2. Heating the mixture at or near its -200 +325 43.5
boiling point (usually about 110° C.) -325 11.7
under reflux, so as to promote hydrolysis of + 60 mesh 1

-60 +100 14
the monocalcium phosphate in the mixture c.p. monocalcium phosphate mono- -100 +150 15
to dicalcium phosphate and phosphoric -150 +200 25
acid. hydrate containing 56.0% phosphorus -200 +325 40
3. Heating the mixture without reflux pentoxide, and c.p. grades of phos- -325 5
in anopen container to a temperature of at phoric and sulfuric acids were used.
least 130° C. and preferably 185° C., _
, Phosphate rock, water,
1 '

under which conditions the acid formed


rrnrpfinrp
and monocalcium phos- In subsequent cycles, the ground
by the hydrolysis is concentrated and phate monohydrate, superphosphate, or product was brought back to the same
reacts with the phosphate rock. The acid were mixed in a 250- or 300-ml. free water content as the initial mixture,
product from this heating is a dry mass and the hydrolysis and conversion steps
Erlenmeyer flask, which was then fitted
consisting largely of dicalcium phosphate with a reflux condenser and a stainless were repeated.
and small proportions of monocalcium The samples
steel mixer, the shaft of which extended were analyzed according
phosphate and rock phosphate. to the procedures of the Association of
4. Grinding the product from step 3, through the condenser. The flask was
then placed in an oil bath heated by Official Agricultural Chemists (7), ex-
rewetting with water, and repeating steps
2 and 3, thereby converting the unreacted either an electric hot plate or gas flame. cept that the colorimetric procedure of
monocalcium phosphate and phosphate The oil bath was maintained at a tem- Bridger, Boylan, and Markey (2) was
used for determination of phosphorus
pentoxide in the final solutions. The
procedure was checked frequently against
a Bureau of Standards phosphate rock

Table I. Effect of Water Content of Hydrolysis Mixture on Reaction of sample.


Phosphate Rock and Monocalcium Phosphate Monohydrate0
% P2O5 in Product Reaction of Phosphate Rock with
% Free Citrate- Water- % PsOa Monocalcium Phosphate Monohydrate
Water Total insol. Ayail. soluble Availability
Untreated mixture6 47.9 8.7 39.2 31.8 82.0 A series of experiments was carried
out to determine the optimum conditions
0 51.0 11.0 40.0 32.0 78.5
1.6 51 .0 6.9 43.1 32.3 84.6 for reaction between phosphate rock and
7.3 51.8 1.8 50.0 19.7 96.5 monocalcium phosphate monohydrate.
14.3 52.6 1.2 51.4 18.8 97.7 In these experiments the proportion of
18.9 51.0 2.2 48.8 16.6 95.7 monocalcium phosphate monohydrate
24.7 52.2 2.1 50.1 13.1 96.0
15.5 93.2 was expressed as an equivalent acidula-
42.1 51.6 3.5 48.1
tion ratio of acid phosphorus pentoxide to
0
Acidulation ratio, 1.0 mole acid PjOs/mole rock P2O5; hydrolysis time, 30 min.;
conversion temperature, 185 ° C.; conversion time, 30 min. rock phosphorus pentoxide. In calculat-
6
No free water. ing this ratio it was assumed that two
thirds of the phosphorus pentoxide in the

332 AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY


monocalcium phosphate monohydrate
was acid phosphorus pentoxide and one Table II. Effect of Conversion Temperature on Reaction of Phosphate Rock
third was rock phosphorus pentoxide, and Monocalcium Phosphate Monohydrate"
as required by Equation 3. As an ex-
% P2O5 in Product % P2O5
ample of the calculation, when 50 grams
-

Conversion Citrate- Water- Avail- %F


of phosphate rock and 88.5 grams of Temp., °C. Total insol. Avail. soluble ability %f loss
monocalcium phosphate monohydrate Untreated mixture6 47.9 8.7 39.2 31.8 82.0 1.37=
were used, the acidulation ratio was 1.0, 115 48.0 5.9 42.1 31.7 88.0
calculated as follows: 125 49.8 4.4 45.4 30.7 91.1 1.14 14
135 49.3 4.6 44.7 26.5 90.8 0.65 54
145 51 .0 3.5 47.5 25.1 93.1 1.09 25
Acidulation ratio =
155 51.4 3.2 48.2 23.2 93.8 0.87 41
165 52.8 1.6 51.2 97.0 0.64 57
(0.667) (88.5) (0.560) 175 53.7 1.4 52.3 12.0 97.4 0.68 56
(0.333) (88.5) (0.560) + (50) (0.332) 185 53.5 1.0 52.5 11.2 98.2 0.75 51
195 53.9 1.2 52.7 7.4 98.0 0.69 55
205 52.2 1.4 50.8 7.0 97.4 0.57 62
Experiments were 215 53.4 1.6 51.8 4.4 97.1 0.80 48
Effect of
made in which the 225 53.4 1.8 51.6 5.4 96.9 0.76 50
Hydrolysis Time 258 53.0 3.2 49.8 4.8 94.0
hydrolysis time was
varied from 0 to 2 hours. The hydrolysis 0
Equivalent acidulation ratio, 1.0 mole acid PaOs/mole rock P2O5; free water content
time was considered to be time at boiling during hydrolysis, 14%; hydrolysis time, 15 min.; conversion time, 30 min.
6 Before addition of free water.
and did not include preheating time, =
Calculated from fluorine content of rock.
which was usually 15 to 20 minutes for a
conversion temperature of 130° C.
When hydrolysis was omitted en-
tirely, the increase in conversion to avail-
able phosphorus pentoxide was less than temperature of 185° C., and a conversion drolysis time of 15 minutes and a conver·
half that achieved with 15-minute hv- time of 30 minutes were used. sion time of 30 minutes were used.
drolysis time. Some hydrolysis took When no free water was used, no The results are shown in Table II and
place during the preheating and conver- conversion to available phosphorus pent- Figure 1. Maximum conversion to avail-
sion step, but a definite advantage was oxide was achieved; in fact, there was a able phosphorus pentoxide (98.2%) was
achieved by holding the mixture at its slight decrease in conversion. With the achieved at a conversion temperature of
boiling point for at least 15 minutes. lowest percentage of free water used 185° C. However, over a temperature
When the hydrolysis time was in- (1.6%), the mixture appeared to be dry range from 155° to 245° C., conversions
creased to 1 or 2 hours, the improvement and little agglomeration took place, but of 95% or higher were achieved. The
in conversion was less than 1%. It was a slight improvement in conversion re- water-soluble phosphorus pentoxide con-
concluded that a 15-minute hydrolysis sulted. With the next highest percentage tent of the products, however, decreased
time was sufficient to achieve high con- of free water (7.3%), a thick paste and rapidly over this temperature range, and
version and that greater times were not high conversion resulted. With all the it would therefore be possible to produce
warranted. other proportions of water, thin slurries products having large or small propor-
The data of Elmore resulted. Maximum conversion was ac- tions of their phosphorus pentoxide in
Effect of
and Farr (3) show hieved at about 14% free water, but the the water-soluble form as desired. For
Water Content
that the hydrolysis of effect of water proportion was not great example, a product having half of its
monocalcium phosphate monohydrate over a wide range (from 7.3 to 42.1%). available phosphorus pentoxide in the
to phosphoric acid and dicalcium phos- The water-soluble phosphorus pentoxide water-soluble form could be made at a
phate (Equation 5) is at a maximum at content of the products decreased at the conversion temperature of 147° C. with a
100° C. in a saturated solution contain- higher free water contents, presumably conversion of 94%, and a product having
ing 78% monocalcium phosphate mono- because of the greater time of heating to 25% of its available phosphorus pent-
hydrate and 22% water, but that almost the conversion temperature. oxide in a water-soluble form could be
as high conversion can be achieved in A series of experiments made at a conversion temperature of
Effect of
considerably more dilute solutions. In Conversion
was made with an 173° C. with a conversion of 98%.
the present work approximately the same acidulation ratio of 1.0 Conversion time
Effect of
—, .

proportion of free water to monocalcium


Temperature
pound of acid phos- Conversion Time
varied in a
was
phosphate monohydrate was usually phorus pentoxide per pound of rock of runs in
series
used, but almost as good results could be phosphorus pentoxide (1.77 pounds of which conversion temperature was 185°
obtained with smaller proportions. It monocalcium phosphate monohydrate C. (Table III). The time required for
was found that only sufficient water to per pound of phosphate rock). A hy- the hydrolyzed mixture to reach conver-
produce a slurry at the boiling tem-
perature was needed to promote the
hydrolysis. It is desirable to use the least
amount of water consistent with good
Table III. Effect of Conversion Time on Reaction of Phosphate Rock and
conversion, as the expense of removing
the w'ater in the conversion step will Monocalcium Phosphate Monohydrate"
thereby be reduced. % P2O6 in Product
Table I shows the results of experi- Conversion Citrate.· Water- % Pios
ments made with various proportions of Time, Min. Total insol. Avail. soluble Availability
free water. These experiments were at 0 51.4 1.8 49.6 23.6 96.8
an acidulation ratio of 1.0 pound of acid
10 51.4 1.8 49.6 21.2 96.8
30 52.5 1.5 51.0 19.8 97.2
phosphorus pentoxide per pound of rock 60 52.4 1.3 51.1 18.9 97.7
phosphorus pentoxide (1.77 pounds of 180 53.4 1.5 51.9 15.5 97.3
monocalcium phosphate monohydrate 0
Acidulation ratio, 1.0 mole acid p20s/mole rock P2O5; hydrolysis time, 30 min.
per pound of phosphate rock). A 30- free water content during hydroly sis, 14%; conversion temperature, 185° C.
minute hydrolysis time, a conversion

VOL. 4, NO. 4, APRIL 1 95 6 333


Pounds Ga(H2P04)2-H20 per pound rock

A
Figure 1. Effect of conversion temperature in treatment of
phosphate rock and monocalcium phosphate
Acidulation ratio 1.0

Figure 2. Effect of acidulation ratio in treatment of


phosphate rock with monocalcium phosphate
Conversion temperature 185 °C.

sion temperature was80 minutes. Ad- of 95.8% was achieved at an acidulation carried out with a triple superphosphate
ditional time at this temperature im- ratio of 0.8. Further cycles would prob- made in the laboratory by mixing some
proved conversion only very slightly, ably have increased the conversion of the phosphate rock with 74% c.p.
but significantly decreased the water- slightly but not enough to be of prac- phosphoric acid at an acidulation ratio
soluble phosphorus pentoxide content tical interest. It appears that high con- of 2.3 moles of acid phosphorus pent-
and increased total and available phos- versions cannot be attained at still lower oxide per mole of rock phosphorus pent-
phorus pentoxide content, apparently acidulation ratios approaching the theo- oxide and curing at room temperature
through dehydration. Conversion time retical limit of 0.5; this is doubtless due until the moisture content of the product
is therefore another means of controlling to consumption of some of the acid by was 1.6%. This triple superphosphate
the proportion of water-soluble phos- the rock impurities and to the small pro- was then mixed with various proportions
phorus pentoxide in the product. portion of residual monocalcium phos- of phosphate rock and subjected to treat-
Experiments were phate monohydrate. ments in which a 30-minute hydrolysis
Effect of
Acidulation Ratio
made with various As expected, the water-soluble phos- time, a 185° C. conversion temperature,
proportions of phorus pentoxide content of the products and a 30-minute conversion time were
monocalcium phosphate monohydrate decreased with decreasing acidulation used. The results are shown in Table
and rock; a hydrolysis time of 1 hour, a ratio and with each cycle of treatment. IV. To achiteve high conversion (94%)
conversion temperature of 185 0 C., and a The proportion of available phosphorus in a single cycle, it was necessary to use an
conversion time of 30 minutes were used. pentoxide in the water-soluble form can acidulation ratio of 1.2 moles of acid
The free water content of the hydrolysis thus be controlled by the acidulation phosphorus pentoxide per mole of rock
mixture ranged from 12.4 to 19.6%, the ratio as well as by conversion time and phosphorus pentoxide. When an acidu-
largest proportion being used at the temperature. lation ratio of 1.1 was used, the same
lowest acidulation ratio. conversion could be obtained by using
The results are shown in Figure 2. two cycles. The necessity for higher
Reaction of Phosphate
For a single cycle the conversion to
Rock with Superphosphates
acidulation ratios than in the experiments
available phosphorus pentoxide de- with pure monocalcium phosphate was
creases sharply at acidulation ratios lower As normal and triple superphosphates due to the additional impurities from the
than 1.0 mole of acid phosphorus pent- are the cheapest sources of monocalcium triple superphosphate. The water-
oxide per mole of rock phosphorus pent- phosphate monohydrate, experiments soluble phosphorus pentoxide contents
oxide. Flowever, second cycle product were made in which these materials were of the products were lower than when
having a conversion of 97.3% was ob- made to react with phosphate rock by pure monocalcium phosphate was used.
tained at an acidulation ratio of 0.9 and the above process. In another series of experiments, a
third cycle product having a conversion The first series of experiments was commercial triple superphosphate made

334 AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY


with wet-process phosphoric acid was phosphate rock with 72% c.p. sulfuric that there is less calcium sulfate pres-
used in various proportions. In cal- acid in the proportion of 2.6 moles of ent.
culating acidulation ratio, it was as- sulfuric acid per mole of rock phosphorus
sumed that the superphosphate had been pentoxide and curing the mixture at Reaction of Phosphate
made with an acidulation ratio of 2.3 room temperature until its moisture con- Rock with Phosphoric Acid
moles of acid phosphorus pentoxide per tent was 7%. Mixtures of the normal
mole of rock phosphorus pentoxide. superphosphate and phosphate rock in Experiments were made to determine
In these experiments a hydrolysis time proportions equivalent to 1.6 and 2.1 the conditions under which phosphate
of 15 minutes, a conversion time of 30 moles of sulfuric acid per mole of rock rock and phosphoric acid could be used
minutes, and a conversion temperature phosphorus pentoxide were subjected to directly in the process. In the first series
of 130° C. were used (Table IV). several cycles of hydrolysis and conver- of these experiments, phosphate rock and
It is not possible to compare these re- sion. In the first series, the hydrolysis phosphoric acid were subjected directly
sults precisely with those from the mono- time was 15 minutes, the conversion tem- to hydrolysis. A hydrolysis time of 1
calcium phosphate monohydrate and perature was 130° C., and the conversion hour, a conversion temperature of 185° C.
laboratory triple superphosphate experi- time was 30 minutes. In the second and a conversion time of 30 minutes were
ments as there is some uncertainty about series, the hydrolysis time was 1 hour, the used. Acidulation ratios of 0.8, 1.0,
the exact acidulation ratio. However, conversion temperature was 185° C., and and 1.2 pounds of acid phosphorus pent-
the results demonstrate that the process the conversion time was 30 minutes. oxide per pound of rock phosphorus pent-
is applicable to commercial triple super- The results are shown in Table V. oxide were used. The results, shown in
phosphate made with wet-process acid, Although significant conversion was Table VI, indicate that conversion is not
which contains sulfuric acid and other achieved at acidulations lower than so high after the first cycle as in the ex-
impurities. It appears that a product of those used for normal superphosphate periments with laboratory triple super-
high phosphorus pentoxide availability manufacture, several cycles were neces- phosphate, but the second cycle product
can be made at an equivalent acidula- sary and higher acidulation ratios were was about the same. This seemed to in-
tion ratio of about 1.2 pounds of acid required than with monocalcium phos- dicate that the limiting factor in the
phosphorus pentoxide per pound of rock phate or triple superphosphate. This is first cy'cle conversion was formation of
phosphorus pentoxide with a two-cycle doubtless due to the interfering action of monocalcium phosphate monohydrate
treatment and with ari acidulation ratio the calcium sulfate in the product. Both initially from the rock and acid.
of about 1.4 with a one-cycle treatment. the total and available phosphorus pent- Further experiments were made in
Two series of experiments were made oxide contents of the products were which the rock and acid were mixed in
with an experimental normal super- higher than those of the initial normal two steps. In the first step, sufficient
phosphate prepared by mixing the superphosphate, which is due to the fact rock was added to bring the acidulation

Table IV. Reaction of Triple Superphosphate and Phosphate Rock


Acidulation Ratio _
% P2O5 in Product
Acid P2O5 Lb. TSP Citrate- Water
% Free % P2Os
Rock P2O5 Lb. rock Water0 Cycle Total insol. Avail. so/ub/e Availability
Laboratory TSP Made with c.p. Acid6
TSP' 50.1 0.8 49.3 47.6 98.4
1.0 1.68 20.9 UMd 43.8d 10.2d 33.6d 30.6d 76.8d
1 48.0 6.6 41.4 10.2 86.2
2 47.9 4.4 43.5 5.3 90.8
1.1 2.01 20.5 UMd 45.0d 9.3d 35. ld 32.5d 78.4d
1 49.3 4.9 44.4 9.5 90.0
2 49.6 2.7 46.9 5.5 94.5
1.2 2.39 20.2 UMd 44.8d 8.4d 36.4d 34.0d 81.3d
1 49.1 2.9 46.2 13.6 94.0
2 49.5 2.0 47.5 7.6 96.0
Commercial TSP Made with Wet-Process Acid®
TSP/ 45.8 1.0 44.8 42.0 98.0
1.14 2.36 16.5 UMd 43.2d 8.9d 34.3d 29.6d 79.4d
1 43.8 6.9 36.9 24.1 84.4
2 45.2 6.5 38.7 19.4 85.7
1 .25 2.84 20.6 UMd 43.0d 6.4d 36.6d 30.2d 85.2d
1 44.6 4.5 40.1 22.4 90.0
2 45.6 2.4 43.2 16.3 94.6
3 45.6 1.6 44.0 14.9 96.5
1.38 3.62 15.1 UMd 43.6d 4.7d 38.9d 32.4d 89.4d
1 46.4 2.9 43.5 24.9 94.0
2 47.0 1.6 45.4 16.5 96.5
3 47.0 1.0 46.0 14.0 98.0
1.45 4.06 20.1 UMd 43.8d 4.3d 39.5d 33.ld 90. ld
1 46.4 2.2 44.2 24.6 95.3
2 47.0 0.8 46.2 18.2 98.3
3 47.0 0.5 46.5 16.8 99.0
a
In hydrolysis mixture; includes water added and moisture content of TSP.
6
Hydrolysis time, 30 min.; conversion temperature, 185° C.; conversion time, 30 min.
' TSP contained 1.6% moisture.
J Untreated mixture before addition of free water.

Hydrolysis time, 15 min.; conversion temperature, 130° C.; conversion time, 30 min.
! TSP contained 2.3% moisture.

VOL. 4, NO. 4, APRIL 1 9 5 6


335
Table V. Reaction of Normal Superphosphate and Phosphate Rock
Acidulafion Ratio % P2Os in Product
Moles H2SO4 Lb. NSP
% Free Citrate- Wafer- % P2O5
Mole P2O5 lb. rock Wafer" Cycle Total insol. Avail. soluble Availability
NSP6 20.2 0.3 19.9 18.3 98.6
Runs with Conversion Temperature of 130° C.
1.6 2.73 30.3 UM" 24.0" 7.1= 16.9= 13.8= 70.5=
1 24.9 6.2 18.7 8.5 75.1
2 25.5 5.0 20.5 4.3 80.5
3 26.0 4.5 21.5 2.1 82.8
2.1 7.15 30.5 UM" 22.2" 3.3= 18.9= 16.6= 85.2=
1 22.3 2.5 19.8 15.7 89.0
2 23.7 2.0 21.7 9.4 91.5
3 23.7 1.4 22.3 7.9 94.2
4 23.9 1.4 22.5 6.2 94.2
Runs with Conversion Temperature of 185° C. i
1.6 2.73 30.3 UM" 24.0= 7.1= 16.9= 13.8= 70.5=
1 24.7 6.7 18.0 4.0 72.9
2 25.6 6.4 19.2 3.4 75.0
2.1 7.15 30.5 UM" 22.2= 3.3= 18.9= 16.6= 85.2=
1 23.2 2.3 20.9 6.6 90.2
2 24.6 2.2 22.4 4.6 91.1

Hydrolysis time, 15 min.; conversion time, 30 min.
6 Normal
superphosphate contained 7.0% moisture.
c
Untreated mixture before addition of free water.
d
Hydrolysis time, 1 hour; conversion time, 30 min.

ratio to 2.3 pounds of acid phosphorus tive, as its surface would be free of pre- mixing of rock, water, and acid, and
pentoxide per pound of rock phosphorus cipitated dicalcium phosphate. How- hydrolysis. The precuring was carried
pentoxide. The mixture was hydrolyzed ever, the results of these experiments, out at room temperature in closed flasks.
for 1.5 hours, the remainder of the rock which are not shown in detail, were not The results, which are not shown in detail,
was added, and the conversion step was significantly different from those in indicated that a 2-day precuring period
carried out at a temperature of 185° C. which all the rock was added at the was sufficient to give products equivalent
and a time of 30 minutes. It was thought same time. to those made from the laboratory triple
that by this procedure the rock added In the next series of experiments, vari- superphosphate. Products were made by
after hydrolysis might be more reac- ous precuring times were used between this procedure at three different acidu-

Table VI, Reaction of Phosphoric Acid and Phosphate Rock


Acldulatlon Ratio _% P2O5 in Product
Acid P2O5 Lb. H3PO4
% Free Citrate- Wafer- % PiOs
Rock P2O5 lb. rock Wafer" Cycle Total insoluble Available soluble Availability
Direct Hydrolysis Procedure6
0.8 0.367 20.1 1 45.2 11.6 33.6 6.1 73.4
2 46.5 9.6 36.9 3.6 79.4
1.0 0.459 19.0 1 46.6 8.6 38.0 10.5 81.5
2 48.2 4.3 43.9 5.8 89.2
1.2 0.550 18.1 1 49.8 4.7 45.1 13.2 92.6
2 49.0 1.2 47.8 9.0 97.6
2-Day Precuring Procedure"
1.0 0.459 19.0 1 47.8 6.0 41.8 12.1 87.5
2 47.9 3.7 44.2 4.5 92.5
1.1 0.505 18.5 1 49.6 6.0 43.6 11.6 88.0
2 48.5 2.6 45.9 6.0 94.7
1.2 0.550 18.1 1 49.2 5.1 44.1 16.1 89.7
2 49.0 1.4 47.6 11.5 97.3
Increased Hydrolysis Time Procedure4
1.0 0.459 19.0 1 46.9 6.4 40.5 11 .7 86.4
2 47.4 2.8 44.6 4.0 94.3
1.1 0.505 18.5 1 47.4 4.9 42.5 14.0 90.0
2 47.8 1.6 46.5 6.0 96.8
1.2 0.550 18.1 1 49.5 3.0 46.5 10.6 94.0
2 48.2 0.8 47.4 11.3 98.3

In hydrolysis mixture.
6¡Hydrolysis time, 1 hour; conversion temperature, 185° C.; conversion time, 30 min.
6
Hydrolysis time, 30 min.; conversion temperature, 185° C.; conversion time, 30 min. 0
d
Hydrolysis time, 5 hours for first cycle and 1 hour for second cycle; conversion temperature, 185 C.; conversion time, 30 min.

336 AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY


lations and with two cycles of treat-
ment; the results are shown in Table Table VII. Reaction of Idaho Phosphate Rocks with Monocalcium Phos·
VI. Except for the first cycle product phate"
at an acidulation ratio of 1.2, the prod-
% P2O5 in Product
ucts were somewhat higher in conver- in Citrate- Wafer- %
% P¡0¡ P2O5
sion than those from the direct hy- Phosphate Rock Cycle Total insoluble Available soluble Availability
drolysis procedure. 35.3 UM* 48.2s 7.8s 40.4s 37.4s 83.6s
Another procedure that gave im- 1 51.4 1.9 49.5 16.2 96.3
proved results was use of an increased 31.6 UM6 45.7s 8.2s 37.5s 35.0s 82.0s
hydrolysis time. A series of experiments 1 50.1 3.2 46.9 12.7 93.5
was made in which the phosphate rock, UM* 7.8s 37.3s 35.2s 82.7s
31.2 45.1s
phosphoric acid, and water were mixed 1 50.1 3.2 46.9 16.2 93.5
and immediately subjected to hydrolysis 29.7 UM* 45.3s 8.5s 36.8s 33.5s 81.3s
for 5 hours, followed by conversion at 1 50.5 3.4 47.1 11.7 93.3
185° C. for 30 minutes. The results, 0
Acidulation ratio, 1.0 mole acid PiOs/mole rock P2O5; hydrolysis time, 30 min.;
shown in Table VI, indicate improved free water in hydrolysis, 14%; conversion temperature, 185 0 C.; conversion time, 30 min.
conversion over the 1-hour direct hy- b
Untreated mixture before addition of free water.
drolysis procedure and the 2-day pre-
curing procedure for both first and
second cycle products.
treatment. This is somewhat more than partly water-soluble; the relative pro-
is usually volatilized in normal or triple portions of the two forms are controllable
Use of Other Phosphate Rocks by the proportion of monocalcium phos-
superphosphate manufacture, and the
A number of Idaho phosphate rocks potential fluorine recovery would there- phate or acid used, and by the conversion
fore be greater for the new process. time and temperature. For some fer-
of various grades were tried in the proc-
tilizer applications a product having
ess. Each rock was made to react with
most of its phosphorus pentoxide water-
monocalcium phosphate monohydrate Proposed Continuous Process
insoluble is advantageous; for others it
at an acidulation ratio of 1.0 mole of
The process is adaptable for develop- is desirable to have some of the phos-
acid phosphorus pentoxide per mole of
ment to continuous operation. A con- phorus pentoxide in a water-soluble
rock phosphorus pentoxide. A hy-
tinuous process would consist of a series form.
drolysis time of 30 minutes, a conver- of units for continuous mixing, hydroly- The physical condition of the product
sion temperature of 185° C., and a con-
sis, conversion, and grinding. The is excellent, as its moisture content and
version time of 30 minutes were used.
The results, shown in Table VII, in- product from the first cycle of steps free acid content are very low and it
dicate that all the rocks respond to the
could be rewetted and processed a probably can be stored in bags or bulk
second time in a separate series of units, without caking or bag rot.
treatment.
or part of it could be recycled to the first
series of units. Engineering develop-
ment will be required, but no inherent
Properties of Products Acknowledgment
difficulties seem to present themselves.
Several of the products w'ere subjected Considerably less acid is This work was supported by the Iowa
to x-ray diffraction analysis. The re- Advantages required to convert the Engineering Experiment Station and the
sults show that the products made at a phosphorus pentoxide in Rauh-Martenet Foundation. The x-ray
conversion temperature of 185° C. con- phosphate rock to an available form than analyses were carried out by the Mon-
sisted primarily of anhydrous dicalcium in other processes. When phosphoric acid santo Chemical Co.
phosphate and a small amount of un- is used, only about half as much acid
reacted phosphate rock; monocalcium based on the rock phosphorus pentoxide,
phosphate was not identified, but there or about three fourths as much based on Literature Cited
was evidence of amorphous material. the available phosphorus pentoxide in
Products made at a conversion tempera- the product, is required as by the usual (1) Assoc. Offic. Agr. Chemists, Wash-
ington, D.C., “Official Methods of
ture of 130° C. also contained a small triple superphosphate process. When Analysis,” 7th ed., 1950.
amount of monocalcium phosphate sulfuric acid is used, the saving is less but (2) Bridger, G. L., Boylan, D. R., Mar-
monohydrate. The sample made from significant. Because both sulfuric and key, J. W., Anal. Chem. 25, 336-8
commercial triple superphosphate, nor- phosphoric acids are heavily dependent (1953).
mal superphosphate, and sulfuric acid on elemental sulfur production, the proc- (3) Elmore, K. L., Farr, T. D., Ind. Eng.
contained in addition anhydrous calcium ess offers a means of extending sulfur Chem. 32, 580-6 (1940).
sulfate and a small proportion of calcium reserves over a considerably longer (4) Fox. E. J., Whittaker, C. W., Ibid.,
sulfate hemihydrate. 19, 349-53 (1927).
period.
Free acid and moisture were deter- The product made with phosphoric (5) Jacob. K. D., Am. Fertilizer 93, (8)
7-9 20. 22; (9) 7-10, 22, 24
¡
mined in a number of products. Mois- acid is almost as high in available phos-
(1940).
ture was usually in the range 0 to 1%, phorus pentoxide concentration as triple (6) Walthall, J. H., “Fertilizer Tech-
since the products had been heated to superphosphate, and that made with nology and Resources,” ed. by
considerably higher temperatures than sulfuric acid is higher in available phos- K. D. Jacob, pp. 236-41, Aca-
the 100° C. which is used in the mois- phorus pentoxide concentration than demic Press, New York. 1953.
ture determination. Free acid as deter- normal superphosphate. (7) Zbornik, T. W., U.S. Patent 2,361,-
mined by the acetone extraction method No curing of the product is required in 444 (1944).
was very low, usually less than 2%. the process, whereas in many present
Fluorine determinations were made on processes several weeks of curing are re- Received for review September 7, 1955. Ac-
some of the samples, and some of the re- cepted December 2, 1955. Division of Fertilizer
quired. and Soil Chemistry, 128th Meeting, ACS,
sults are shown in Table II. In general, The phosphorus pentoxide content of
Minneapolis, Minn., September 1955. Patent
about half of the fluorine in the initial the product may be either largely water- application on process filed and assigned to the
raw materials was volatilized in the insoluble or partly water-insoluble and Iowa State College Research Foundation.

VOL. 4, NO. 4, APRIL 19 5 6


337

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen