Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Steve Turner
Senior Member, IEEE
Beckwith Electric Company, Inc.
6190-118th Avenue North
Largo, FL 33773-3724
Phone 727.544.2326 FAX: 727.546.0121
STurner@BeckwithElectric.com
From Table 1:
I1 = 0.8 per unit (17)
I2 = 0.6 per unit (18)
B. 2nd Example
Now consider a transformer differential characteristic
for a two-winding transformer connected delta (DAB) –
wye with wye connected CTs on both sides. A
numerical transformer differential relay internally
compensates the CT currents as follows:
252
3I0 and IG add together in (21) above when the ground method to check that the relay is properly set. One
fault is internal since they have opposite polarity for this example of playback is to evaluate the performance of
condition. the restrained differential protection for transformer
A good test is to check how much sensitivity 87GD inrush with varying levels of harmonic content in the
provides for ground faults located close to the neutral of current waveforms.
wye connected windings coupled with fault resistance Transformer differential protection has historically
(RF). Consider the case of a two winding delta wye 25 used the 2nd harmonic content of the differential
MVA distribution transformer connected to a 230 kV current to prevent unwanted operation during
grid and serving load at 23 kV. Here is the power transformer inrush. It is advantageous to use both the
system data: 2nd and 4th harmonic content of the differential current.
Source impedance (XS) varies The relay can internally calculate the total harmonic
XT = 10% current per phase as follows:
RF varies
I2-4 = I 22 I 42 (22)
Ground fault located 5% from neutral
CTR23 kV = 600:5
CTRGND = 600:5 The sum of the two even harmonics per phase helps
to prevent the need to lower the value of restraint which
Fig. 3 illustrates the sensitivity of 87GD as a function could cause a delayed operation if an internal fault were
of the source impedance and ground fault resistance. to occur during transformer energization.
The top curve corresponds to each point where IG is Cross-phase averaging also helps prevent unwanted
equal to 200 milli-amperes (that is, the minimum operation during transformer inrush. Cross-phase
amount required for operation or the maximum averaging averages the even harmonics of all three
sensitivity possible). The middle curve corresponds to phases to provide overall restraint. The cross-phase
each point where IG is equal to 500 milli-amperes. The averaged harmonic restraint can be internally calculated
bottom curve corresponds to each point where IG is by the relay as follows:
equal to 1 amp. The source impedance and ground fault Ir2-4 = I A2 24 I B2 24 I C2 24 (23)
resistance are in ohms primary.
87GD Sensitivity
The transformer relay with even harmonic restraint
180 and cross-phase averaging tested for the following cases
160 did not misoperate. The inrush currents presented here
140
were created using ATP and have a slow rate of decay.
Fault Resistance
120
The auto-transformer data is as follows:
100
80
60
40
13.2 kV
20
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
W
Source Impedance
lta
253
TABLE 2
AUTO-TRANSFORMER CHARACTERISTICS 1st Case – Balanced Inrush
ZHM = 0.01073 per unit Energize Line with Bank from Single End
ZHL = 0.04777 per unit (No residual flux)
ZML = 0.03123 per unit
Z HM Z HL Z ML
ZH = = 0.0140 per unit [24]
2
Z HM Z ML Z HL
ZM = = -0.0029 per unit [25]
2
Z HL Z ML Z HM
ZL = = 0.0340 per unit [26]
2
CTRW1 = 1200:5 (wye connected)
CTRW2 = 2000:5 (wye connected)
600MVA
TAP2 = = 3.77 (28)
230kV x 400 x 3
254
2nd Case – Balanced Inrush 3rd Case – Unbalanced Inrush
Energize Bank from Winding 2 with Winding 1 Open Energize Line with Bank from Single End
(No residual flux) (Severe A-phase residual flux)
Fig. 6C. 4th harmonic component currents for balanced Fig. 7C. 4th Harmonic component currents for
inrush unbalanced inrush
255
IV. CONCLUSIONS
4th Case – Balanced Inrush A common commissioning practice is to test all the
Energize Bank from Winding 2 with Winding 1 numerical relay settings to verify they were properly
Open (Severe A-phase residual flux) entered. Automated testing using computer software to
run the test set has made this possible since the overall
commissioning for a numerical relay could consist of
several hundred tests. While this is a good check, it is
still important to ensure that the transformer is
thoroughly protected for the particular application.
This paper presented three types of test for
transformer differential protection:
x Transformer Differential Characteristic
Boundary Test
x Ground Differential Sensitivity Test
x Even Harmonic Restraint during Transformer
Inrush
The first test determines if the transformer differential
protection meets the stated accuracy for the operating
characteristic slopes. The second test determines the
Fig. 8A. Total Phase Currents for Unbalanced Inrush fault resistance coverage of the ground differential
protection as a function of the source impedance. The
third test determines if the transformer differential
protection harmonic restraint works during a variety of
stringent conditions that could occur during actual
energization.
256