Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Contents
Introduction .................................................................................................................................................... 3
Preparing your assignment ............................................................................................................................. 4
Preparing for your exam ................................................................................................................................. 7
Searching for information ............................................................................................................................... 8
Analysing sources of information.................................................................................................................. 10
Referencing and citations.............................................................................................................................. 12
Feedback and results..................................................................................................................................... 12
Consideration for illness or disability ............................................................................................................ 13
Plagiarism ...................................................................................................................................................... 14
This guide is designed to give you some strategies to use when preparing for your assessments.
Assessment is an integral part of learning. It focuses your learning and structures how you learn.
In responding to an assessment task you need to make judgments about what to include and how to
include it. You also need to make judgments about how to prepare – the activities you should do, when
you should do them, and how much time you should spend on them.
To make good judgments when preparing for assessments consider the subject learning outcomes and the
requirements of the assessment task. You should reflect on the criteria for the subject learning outcomes
that relate to the assessment task and the criteria for the specific assessment task if made available.
This will help you focus your learning efforts, keep answers relevant to the questions asked, and assist you
in making informed judgments.
If you have any specific queries you should speak with your dedicated student adviser or post your queries
in the online discussion forum in KapLearn. You will also find a range of assessment resources (e.g. policies
and forms) and relevant information in KapLearn and on the Kaplan Professional website.
Kaplan also has a detailed Assessment Policy which outlines student rights and responsibilities, provides
detailed descriptions of assessment types, grading systems and general assessment procedures and
information for students.
Tip: Refer to the ‘Time Management’ resource available in the Learning Hub for helpful information on
how to prepare and plan for managing your study workload.
This section provides you with ideas to help you write your assignment.
Learning outcomes
Do you know what the learning outcomes of the subject are? The learning outcomes (LOs) reflect the topic
material that they relate to and help you to focus on what you must demonstrate in the assignment or
task. It will help you to know how your assignment fits in with the subject learning outcomes.
Your subject learning outcomes are listed in the Subject Overview on the home page in KapLearn.
Your assignment template then sets out how that particular assessment piece maps to the relevant
learning outcomes for the subject. For example:
Excellent (Mark range: 9–12 marks) Satisfactory (Mark range: 6–8.5 marks) Unsatisfactory (Mark range: 0–5.5 marks)
• detailed analysis of objectives and their • basic analysis of objectives and their • incorrect or no analysis of objectives of
appropriateness for the DB fund in appropriateness for the DB fund in the DB fund in terms of return
terms of return requirements and risk terms of return requirements and risk requirements and risk management
management management
• incorrect or no suggestions on how the
• at least 4 suggestions on how the • at least 2–3 basic suggestions on how objectives of the DB fund could be
objectives of the DB fund could be the objectives of the DB fund could be improved
improved improved
• poor or no new objectives identified for
• 2 new well-structured objectives • at least 1 new well-structured DB fund
identified for DB fund objective identified for DB fund
• incorrect or no analysis of objectives of
• detailed analysis of objectives and their • basic analysis of objectives and their the balanced fund in terms of return
appropriateness for the balanced fund appropriateness for the balanced requirements and risk management
in terms of return requirements and fund in terms of return requirements
• incorrect or no suggestions on how the
risk management and risk management
objectives of the balanced fund could be
• at least 4 suggestions on how the • at least 3 basic suggestions on how improved
objectives of the balanced fund could the objectives of the balanced fund
be improved could be improved
Word limits
Be sure to keep to any word limits specified in the assignment. They may be specified for each question, or
the assignment overall. Word limits are based on educational rationale and academic standards and may
also reflect industry expectations/standards. Word limits are also designed to make the author clear and
concise on the point they are identifying, raising or addressing.
Marks will only be awarded for answers up to the word limit specified (plus 10%) for the question or
question part. Any material written after this will not be counted towards your mark for that question.
Consider the following:
• For a question with a word limit of 1,000 words for the question as whole (i.e. the individual parts have
not been allocated a specific word count), you will be awarded marks based on the first 1,100 words,
regardless of how many parts this includes.
• For a question that has three parts and each part has a word limit of 200 words, you will be awarded
marks for the first 220 words of each part, any material written after this will not be eligible for marks.
Where to start?
Subject readings
Subject readings are great place to start when doing research for assignments.
Your reading lists can be found in your KapLearn subject room, under the ‘Learning’ tab. If there is a
prescribed text for your subject, this will be listed in the Subject Overview on the homepage of your
KapLearn subject room.
Reading lists may also direct you to online resources (eBooks, journal articles, web pages), or to the
Kaplan Library catalogue.
Library catalogue
The Library catalogue is a good place to search for resources.
The Kaplan Library collection consists of over 1,000 course-related textbooks, 170 eBooks, and a small
dedicated collection of e-reserves. Kaplan Library also provides access to five databases to assist you in
your studies. In turn, the databases provide access to over 5,000 full-text journal articles, eBooks, reports,
company information and financials, and business dissertations that are relevant to courses in your
programs.
Google Scholar
You’ve probably used Google to search for information before. Whether it was for academic, work or
recreational purposes, we all know how helpful the search engine can be.
Google Scholar is a search engine which searches a wide variety of sources including academic online
journals, conference papers, dissertations, technical reports and books.
Google Scholar provides a simple way to broadly search for scholarly literature. From one place, you can
search across many disciplines and sources: articles, theses, books, abstracts and court opinions, from
academic publishers, professional societies, online repositories, universities and other web sites.
Google Scholar helps you find relevant work across the world of scholarly research.
Searching effectively
The Library information page (accessed via the Library home page) provides you with a number of
step-by-step user guides to ensure you get the most from searching the databases available, as well as
the Library catalogue. We encourage you to access these if you are new to the databases or the catalogue.
Before you start searching, consider taking the following steps:
• Analyse your assignment question
• Brainstorm keywords (you might find a thesaurus useful here)
• Use search limits (within your chosen search tool, use search limits to focus your results)
• Keep keywords together (you might need to use quotation marks to search for a particular phrase in
some cases)
• Combine keywords and synonyms. This is where Boolean operators come in. Boolean operators are the
terms AND, OR and NOT. They are used to join your keywords together to form a search strategy.
The ProQuest Guide No 2: Basic Searching provides more detail on the use of Boolean operators.
• Utilise the user guides provided in the Library information page.
It is important to have an understanding of the different types of information available when conducting
searches and to be able to determine what is appropriate for use and inclusion in an assignment.
When it comes to finding resources for university assignments, the student needs to consider how
authoritative the source is.
There are two main types of sources:
• scholarly (including peer reviewed sources and non-peer reviewed sources)
• non-scholarly.
Scholarly sources
Scholarly sources are more reliable than non-scholarly sources. Scholarly sources are written by academics
or researchers who are experts in their field. These authors have authority in their area of expertise and
produce highly credible work. Credibility is ensured in two important ways:
1. Scholarly articles are peer-reviewed as a quality assurance measure to avoid a lack of objectivity by an
author(s). Peer-reviewed sources are the most reliable sources of information as they go through a
process of review by one or more experts in the field of study before publication.
2. The objective of scholarly articles is to find what has been studied or researched on a topic.
Particularly, in academic research, the main objective of scholarly articles is to identify knowledge gaps
as opportunities for further research. Scholars correctly use standard referencing styles in in-text
citations and bibliographies, for example the Harvard referencing style, so that other researchers can
fill in the identified knowledge gaps in further research.
Non-scholarly sources
Although scholarly and peer-reviewed sources are often the focus for university assignments, you may still
need to use information from non-scholarly sources which are not written for an academic audience.
The trade and popular press include sources from: newspaper articles; government reports; magazines;
management whitepapers; news (on TV, in the newspaper and online); blogs, encyclopedias (everything
from the Britannica to Wikipedia); textbooks; fiction; and speeches. Generally, non-scholarly sources
include most of the information that is found on Google or the internet generally.
These sources can be a great place to find background information about a topic, but it is important to
evaluate your sources so that you are using reliable and accurate information.
When you are undertaking formal academic research, limited use of the trade press and popular press
may be permissible when researchers need to explain political viewpoints and public opinion.
Used sparingly, non-scholarly articles could be permissible as background information in this context.
Relevance
You should only use information that addresses your topic. Compare it to others you have found to make
sure it is the most appropriate source to use.
Authority
Who is the author? Do they have relevant and suitable credentials/qualifications to indicate they are a
legitimate source of information on the topic at hand? What organisation(s) might they be affiliated with.
How, where and by whom was the source published? Who is the sponsoring organisation of the content?
For websites, consider the domain. For example, .edu and .gov may indicate a reliable source.
Sites ending in .com or .net. or .org or .uk for example may present a less regulated view.
Currency
Check the date your source was published and whether it has been updated recently. Out of date
information may not be appropriate.
Referencing and citations can often be a pain point for many students who are undertaking postgraduate
studies and can affect your academic results.
To understand the elements of referencing and safeguard yourself from academic misconduct related to
referencing and citations, we recommend you utilise the below resources. These resources are available
to you in the Library Learning Hub which is accessed via your KapLearn subject room.
• Referencing and Citations Guide
• Harvard referencing quiz
• Assignment checklist.
It is important to undertake research for your assessments to substantiate and expand on your ideas with
information and ideas originally from other sources. This may be in the form of direct quotes, tables or
graphic material, as well as ideas and concepts that you paraphrase or summarise. However, you must
also acknowledge these sources. These acknowledgments are called ‘citations’ or ‘references’.
Kaplan requires you to use the Harvard (or author-date) referencing style for your citations and
references. Footnotes and other referencing styles will not be accepted. You must correctly cite sources
both within your assessment and in a full reference list at the end of your assessment.
If you have any queries about referencing, email: library@kaplan.edu.au.
Feedback
As part of the subject you will be provided with both ‘formative’ and ‘summative’ feedback:
• Formative feedback helps you gauge your progress against a future goal and make changes to your
learning activities to improve your learning and help you achieve your goal. It is often informal and may
come from self-assessment activities, comments from your assessor or group discussions.
• Summative feedback gives you a judgment on what learning you have achieved up to a particular
point, often in the form of a grade and at the end of an assessment.
Some activities may be both formative and summative, such as an assessment task that has a grade
in addition to comments from your assessor that you can use to prepare for your next assessment task.
Results
To pass a subject, you must achieve a combined result from all assessment items of at least 50%. If you
receive a Fail grade in any assessment item (i.e. less than 50%) you may continue in the subject and still
pass the subject, provided you meet the overall 50% criteria.
Assessment results for major assessment items such as assignments and exams are generally released
within four weeks of the assessment period, depending on the qualification. For more information,
refer to the ‘principal study period dates’ and the Assessment Policy on the Kaplan Professional website.
Grading scale
Results for assessments will be recorded as grades using the scale that is outlined in the Assessment
Policy.
Special consideration
You may apply for special consideration if unanticipated events during the study period, such as serious
illness, bereavement or personal trauma, impact your ability to attempt or complete an assessment or
affect your performance in the assessment. You must apply for special consideration using the ‘Special
Consideration’ form as soon as possible before the due date of the assessment (or within 24 hours after
the event). For further information, you should refer to the relevant student policies and forms on
the Kaplan Professional website or contact your Student Adviser.
Reasonable adjustment
Reasonable adjustment is the process used to modify or adjust an assessment item without lessening the
quality or demands for students with documented special needs identified or existing prior to enrolment.
You must apply for reasonable adjustment using the ‘Reasonable Adjustment’ form. For further information,
you should refer to the relevant student policies and forms on the Kaplan Professional website or contact your
Student Adviser.
The Academic Integrity and Conduct Policy defines plagiarism as a person using the words or ideas of
another person as if they were his or her own.
The types of plagiarism listed below are regarded as serious academic offences, whether they occur
intentionally or carelessly. See Kaplan’s Academic Integrity and Conduct policy for further information and
applicable penalties.
Collusion
Collusion is a form of plagiarism, and is considered an academic misconduct under Kaplan policy:
• it can occur as a result of inappropriate collaboration during group work.
• it may also occur through working with others to produce work which is then presented as your own
e.g. study group.
Do not allow others to copy or borrow from your work. Allowing your work to be copied makes you just as
guilty of plagiarism as the student who does the copying and you will be just as liable to the penalties.
As group work allows the sharing of ideas and information to complete a task, it can be difficult to be sure
you are not colluding. The best way to avoid collusion is to ensure that each member of the group writes
their own material using their own words. If you need to refer to group work, ensure you acknowledge the
work of the group.
If you are unsure about how to approach an assessment, ask your student advisor for further information.
Kaplan Library can also assist with research support and resources.
Turnitin
Turnitin is an electronic text matching system used by Kaplan. When an assessment item is submitted to
Turnitin it will be compared with other assessments, internet resources, books, journals and other
material to produce an ‘originality’ report. This report aids in the detection of plagiarism and collusion,
as well as inappropriate referencing and citations.
Kaplan will submit all assessment items to Turnitin. Kaplan recognises that certain levels of similarity may
occur and allows for this in its review but we encourage you to check your work before submitting.