Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
CHAPTER- 01
PROJECT NETWORK TECHNIQUES
Once a project is selected, the focus shifts to its implementation. This involves the completion of numerous
activities by employing various resources. So, that project on paper is translated into reality. The activities of
a project have inter-relationships on the basic of physical, technical and other consideration. For proper
planning, scheduling and control of the activities; network techniques are useful. Project network techniques
provide a framework like: -
Defines the jobs to be done;
Integrates them in a logical time sequence;
Affords a system of dynamic control over the progress of the plan;
Types of Network Techniques
1. Program Evaluation Review Technique (PERT)-
PERT was developed in 1950’s by the US Navy; as a network flow chart with time as the critical factor for
planning and controlling the project. The ‘PERT’ technique is a method of minimizing trouble, delays and
interruptions- by determining critical activities in the project can be coordinated. Hence, the orientation of
PERT is ‘probabilistic’. ‘PERT’ is useful for analyzing project scheduling problems in which the completion
time of the different activities, and therefore the whole project, is not certain. It thus emphasizes the
uncertainties of the completion times of the activities. This method uses three time of estimates for an
activity, rather than a single estimate. They are-
Optimistic Time (a): - This is the shortest time the activity can take to complete. It represents an
ideal estimate.
Most Likely Time (m): - This refers to the time that would be expected to occur most often if the
activity were frequently repeated under exactly the same condition. It is the modal time.
Pessimistic Time (b): - This is the longest time the activity could take to finish. It is the worst time
estimate and represents the time the time the activity would take if bad luck was faced. It occurs
with the probability of less than one percent.
“Estimating the Activity Time”
Assigning time to individual activity is essential in order to complete the network. Therefore, an estimate
must be made to show how long time each activity will take for its completion. This is done by discussing
with the people responsible for the completion of the specific activity.
Te = a + 4m + b
6
Here, a = optimistic time; m = most likely time; b = pessimistic time & te = expected time of the activity
Dr. Meghashree Agarwal
2. Critical Path Method (CPM) –
CPM was developed in 1956-57 by Du Pont Company in the US to solve scheduling problems in the
industrial settings. If the time can be estimated perfectly well and the cost can be calculated accurately, CPM
approach would be superior to ‘PERT’. It has been applied mostly to projects that employ a stable technology
and relatively risk free. ‘CPM’ is most appropriately used in projects in which the activity durations are
known with certainty. Hence, its orientation is deterministic. This technique is basically concerned with
obtaining the trade-offs between the project duration and cost.
“Determination of Activity Floats”
1. Earliest Start Time: - Time at which an activity can start (immediately after start has occurred).
EST = Starting time of the particular activity
2. Earliest Finish Time: - It must start at the earliest time and will take its own time to accomplish event.
EFT = EST + Activity’s Duration
3. Latest Start Time: - This is the latest time at which the activity can start without delaying the project
completion time.
LST = LFT – Activity’s Duration
4. Latest Finish Time: - the latest time at which the activity can finish is immediately before the latest time an
end event can take place.
LFT = Latest expected time of end event
Thus whereas variation in the project time is inherent in the projects where PERT is used, the time is
systematically varied (using additional resources) where CPM is employed. In essence, then, while PERT is
probabilistic in nature and as such is used more in research and development projects. The CPM is a
deterministic technique and thus finds application mostly in the constructions projects.
Widely diverse kind of projects can be analyzed by the techniques of PERT and CPM. In fact, they are
suitable for any situation where: -
The project consists of well-defined collection of activities or tasks.
The activities can be started and terminated independently of each other, even if the resources
employed on the various activities are not independent.
The activities are ordered so that they can be performed in a technological sequence. Thus, precedence
relationships exit which preclude the start of certain activities until others are completed.
The initial step in both of these techniques is to portray the given project graphically by mean of a network
which provides the basic tool for analysis. We shall first consider the construction of networks and principles
underlying them. Next, determine critical activities of a given project, and therefore, lie on the critical path,
together with the scheduling time of activities.
Dr. Meghashree Agarwal
Rules of Network Construction
There are number of ground rules in connection with the handling of events and activities of a project
network that should be followed:-
Each defined activity is represented by one and only one arrow in the network.
The predecessor-successor relationships between the various activities clearly lay down.
The arrows depicting various activities are indicative of the logical precedence only.
The arrow direction indicates the general progression in time. The events making the start of the
activities are called ‘tail events’ while those making the completion of activities are known as ‘head
events’.
Events are identified by numbers. In assigning numbers to the event, care should be taken that there is
no duplication of event numbers in a network.
A network should have only one initial and one terminal node.
An event which represents the joint completion of more than one activity is known as ‘merge event’.
An event which portrays the initiation of more than one activity is called ‘burst event’.
Two or more activities can not be identified with the same beginning and ending events. By
implication, any two events should not be directly connected with more than one arrow.
Application of ‘PERT’ and ‘CPM’ involves the following steps
Separating the project to be scheduled with small and independent jobs / activities;
Determining an order of precedence i.e. which job need to be done before undertaking other job;
Representing diagrammatically the activity sequence;
Assessing the time required for each activity;
Finding the earliest time by which project would be completed;
Shorten the duration of critical activities by developing more resources;
A project network provides a means to derive a lot of information about the project involved. After the
network plan is completed and activity times are known, we analyze it to obtain answers to questions like
when the various activities can be scheduled to be performed, how long it will take the project work to be
completed, and how much cushion is available for performing the activities.
Differences between PERT & CPM
There are some noticeable differences in PERT and CPM-
1. The PERT is probabilistic in nature. It acknowledges and considers the variability in completion times of
activities. On the other hand, the CPM is determined in nature. It is most appropriately useful in projects
in which activity duration are known with certainty.
2. Conduct individual research interviews with stakeholders, including vendors, suppliers, contractors, other
internal and external project resources and selected customers.
3. Assess the issues, challenges and concerns in more depth to discover the root causes of any problems.
4. Review all historical and current documentation related to the project, including team structure, scope
statement, business requirements, project plan, milestone reports, meeting minutes, action items, risk logs,
issue logs and change logs.
5. Review the project plan to determine how the vendor plan has been incorporated into the overall project
plan.
6. Interview selected stakeholders to identify and determine their initial expectations for the project and
determine to what extent their expectations have been met.
7. Review the project quality management and the product quality management to identify issues, concerns
and challenges in the overall management of the project. Identify any opportunities that can be realized
through improvements to the attention of project and product quality.
8. Identify any lessons learned that could improve the performance of future projects within the
organization.
PHASE-III: Report Development
1. Compile the information collected from all of the interviews.
2. Compile the information collected from individuals; who only completed the questionnaire.
3. Consolidate the findings from the project documentation review.
4. Identify the issues, concerns and challenges presented through the review of the project quality
management and product quality management plans and isolate the opportunities you believe may be
realized.
5. Identify all of the project's issues, concerns and challenges.
6. Identify all of the project's opportunities that can be realized through the report's recommendations.
7. Identify the lessons learned that can improve the performance of future projects within the organization.
8. Finalize the creation of the report and recommendations based on the findings and present the detailed
report and recommendations, including a road map to get future projects to the "next level" of
performance.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSION:
A PMIS is typically a computer-driven system (though it can be paper-based) to aid a project manager in the
development of the project. A PMIS is a tool for, not a replacement of, the project manager. The PMIS
cannot, however, replace the expert judgment of the project manager and the project team. The goal of a
PMIS is to automate, organize, and provide control of the project management processes. The PMIS is used
by the project management team to support generation of a project charter, facilitate feedback as the
document is refined, control changes to the project charter, and release the approved document.
An organization chart or org chart is a diagram that shows the hierarchical structure of an organization.
Usually a chart starts with a higher or superior level and branches downward to subordinate levels.
An organizational chart of a company usually shows the managers and sub-workers who make up an
organization. It also shows the relationships between the organization's staff members. Such charts are helpful
to show a new employee where he fits in the organization. In many large companies the organization chart
can be large and incredibly complicated and is therefore sometimes dissected into smaller charts for each
individual department within the organization.
Limitations: -
There are several limitations of organizational charts:
If updated manually, organizational charts can very quickly become out-of-date, especially in large
organizations that changes their staff regularly.
They only show "formal relationships" and tell nothing of the pattern of human (social) relationships
which develop. They also often do not show horizontal relationships.
They provide little information about the managerial style adopted (e.g. "autocratic", "democratic" or an
intermediate style).
They often do not include customers.
Note: - Can refer chapter-14 “Organization Development and Change,” 8th Edition- Cummings & Worley, Page no. 336 to Page no. 336 to 350.