CH8 Consolidation SoilMech - Sett PDF

Asst. Prof. Dr.
Mohammed Shaker Al Shakerchy

Ph.D. in Geotechnical Engineering
Faculty of Engineering / University of Kufa
1
SOIL MECHANICS LECTURES by Dr. Mohammed Sh. M. Al Shakerchy
SOIL MECHANICS LECTURES – 3RD CLASS – CIVIL ENG. DEPT.
SOIL MECHANICS LECTURES by Dr. Mohammed Sh. M. Al Shakerchy 2

The main items in this lecture are:
Total Settlement Settlement vs Time
Sc Degree of Cons.
eo
Average
At Depth
H Degree of
U
mv
Cons.
Z
av Sc
Cc Uav uo
Ce Tv ue
so
Cv Tv
sf
INTRODUCTION
When saturated clay soil is loaded undrained, the pore pressures
increase. Then, under site conditions, the excess pore pressures
dissipate and water leaves the soil, resulting in consolidation
settlement. This process takes time, and the rate of settlement
decreases over time. In sandy soils that are highly permeable, the
drainage caused by the increase in the pore water pressure is
completed immediately.
q
q
ΔH
σi ’ σi ’
us us + ue σi’ + q
us

INTRODUCTION
So, the consolidation is the
Force
in Soil
gradual reduction in volume of a
fully saturated soil of low In Water
coefficient of permeability due to
the dissipation of the excess pore
water pressure.
The amount of settlement which
Settlement
occurs in a given time depends
on the
1.permeability of the soil
Time
2.length of the drainage path Soil
3.compressibility of the soil SOIL MECHANICS LECTURES by Dr. Mohammed Sh. M. Al Shakerchy 5
THEORY
A simple one-dimensional
consolidation model consists of
rectilinear element of soil subject to
vertical changes in loading and
through which vertical (only)
seepage flow is taking place.
There are three variables:

1. the excess pore pressure (ue)
2. the depth of the element in the layer (z)
3. the time elapsed since application of the loading (t)
THEORY
Main assumptions of the theory: -

•The total stress on the element is assumed to remain
constant.
•The coefficient of volume compressibility (mv) is assumed
to be constant.
•The coefficient of permeability (k) for vertical flow is
assumed to be constant.

Vertical static load increments
are applied at regular time
intervals (e.g. 12, 24, 48 hr.). The
load is doubled with each
increment up to the required
maximum (e.g. 25, 50, 100, 200,
400, 800 kPa). During each load
stage thickness changes are
recorded against time.

A plot of settlement DH1 s’3
against time for each
Settlement
stage of the test, the DH2
s’2
rate of settlement may

DH3 s’1
be predicted, as in
Figure below.
v w H w .A H w
e  
vs H s .A H s Time
DH
De 
Hs
A relationship between (e & s’), measured at the end of each (24) hours
when (u) is assumed to be zero, as in Figures below

Coefficient of Compressibility (av):
(e o  e1) De
av  
(s 1  s o ) Ds 
from typical plot of (e-s’): av in (cm2/kg)

Coefficient of Volume Change (mv):
1 dv 1 dH 1 DH
mv  .  .  .
 
v ds H ds H Ds
1
mv is volume change per unit volume per
unit increase in s’ (m2/kN).
mv  av
1  eo
Compression Index (Cc):
from e - log(s’) : -
e1  e2 e1  e2
Cc  
log s 2  log s 1 s
log 2  
 s1 
Expansion Index (Ce) or Unloading

Index (Cr):
De
Cr  Ce 
D log s 
Notes: -
•The empirical correlation between (L.L. & Cc),
Cc = 0.009 (L.L.-10)
•The empirical correlation between (Cc & Cr), Cr = 0.1 Cc
At end of the consolidation (dissipation of the water from pores), the reduction in volume per
unit volume of clay: -
DV e o  e1

Vo 1  eo
Assuming the condition of no lateral strain, Ds = Ds’ dZ dSc

after complete consolidation, this will cause a reduction
dSc: -
e o  e1 s1  so
dSc  .dz 
1  eo s1  so
eo  e1  s1  so  H

dSc   .dz dSc  m v .Ds .dz Sc   m v .Ds .dz
s1  so  1  eo  0

If mv and Ds’ assumed constant with depth, then: -
Sc  m v . Ds . H
e o  e1
OR Sc  .H
1  eo
Cc  sf 
OR Sc  . H . log  Where sf = so + Ds
1  eo  so 
Example 1: if the initial void ratio of a clay is eo = 0.9 at initial
pressure so=95.8 kN/m2, and the compression index of that soil is
equal (Cc)=0.052, H=4 m thick, L.L.=42 %. If the clay layer is loaded
with infinite load of Ds=287.5 kN/m2, calculate the amount of total
settlement of the clay.
Cc  sf 
Sc  . H . log 
1  eo  so 

Example 2: for the soil profile shown in the figure, fill was applied on the natural ground
level. Find the total consolidation settlement.
g = 15 kN/m3, H = 3.5 m
1m Sand, g=14 kN/m3 W.T.
3m Sand
g=17 kN/m3
Clay
3.5 g=19.5 kN/m3, eo=0.9, Cc=0.2,
m Cr=0.02, Cv=0.5 m2/year
Sand

PRECONSOLIDATION PRESSURE (sc or Pc)
A soil in the field at some depth has been subjected to a certain maximum
effective past pressure in its geologic history. This maximum effective past pressure may
be more, equal to or less than the existing effective overburden pressure at that time of
sampling.
Cassagrande proposed an empirical construction to obtain from the (e – log s’)
curve for an over-consolidation clay, the maximum effective vertical stress that has been
acted on the clay in past referred to as the pre-consolidation pressure (s’c), and the
overburden pressure (s’o) is the vertical effective stress acting at any specific point in the
present time.
sc  so : Normally Consolidated Clay (N.C.)
sc  so : Pre-consolidated Clay (Over-Consolidated, O.C.)
sc  so : Under Consolidation
Rc = OCR = sc so … Over-Consolidation Ratio

s c 4
e 2
to find the s’c follow 3
the below steps, from 1
the graph of e-log
s’: -
s’o s’c Log s'

General Cases of Settlement Calculation with Pc: -
1. when sc  so
Cc.H  s o  Ds  
Sc  . log 
1  eo  s o 

2. when sc  so

there are two cases: -
a. when
sf  sc
Cr.H  s c  Cc.H  sc  Ds  

Sc  . log   . log 
1  eo  so  1  e o  sc 

b. when
sf  sc
Cr.H  s f 
Sc  . log 
1  eo  s o 

Ex: 3- for the same Ex. 2, find the total settlement if the clay had been
pre-consolidated to an average pressure of 300 kN/m2.
so =
sc = 300 kN/m2
sc so

EX: In the other case, if the external load change to square footing with
side length of 3 m and q=200 kN/m2, find the total consolidation
settlement.

DEGREE OF CONSOLIDATION (TIME-RATE)
The equations of total consolidation settlement do not provide any

information regarding the rate of primary consolidation. Terzaghi (1925)
proposed the first theory to consider the rate of one-dimensional consolidation
for saturated clay soils.
The mathematical derivations are based on the following six assumptions:
1.the clay-water system is homogeneous,
2.saturation is complete,
3.compressibility of water is negligible,
4.compressibility of soil grains is negligible (but soil grains rearrange),
5.the flow of water is in one direction only (that is, in the direction of
compression), and
6.Darcy's law is valid.

 The process of consolidation (or swell)
for one dimensional consolidation is
 Combining the second
governed by: - and third equations: -
1. the equations of equilibrium for an
element, k 1  e   2h s v
s v  g t .z  Surface stress . 2 
Suppose that the total vertical stress in the
av z t
soil at a depth (z) is increase from
(so) to (s1) and there is no lateral
But, ht = he + u/gw = he +
strain. 1/gw (uss + ue)
 Where: -
2. Stress – Strain relations for the mineral
skeleton,  he: elevation head,
e
  av
s v  uss: steady state pore
3. A continuity equation for the fluid flow pressure (static state),
 2h 1 e  ue: excess pore pressure.
k 2  .
z 1  e  t
 But the pore water pressure  Where, Cv: Coefficient of
and elevation varies linearly Consolidation.
with depth, i.e.,: -  We can express the
effective stress in terms of
 he
2
pore pressure and total
 0
, z 2 stress, and: -
 2 u ss
 0 s at any time  s   (uss  ue )
z 2
u ss
0
 u e k 1  e  s v
2 steady state (no change with time)
t
. 
z 2
g w .a v t  2u e u e s v
Cv .  
k 1  e  k z 2 t t
Cv    Basic Consolidation Equation
g w .a v g w .m v

 The solution will be for uniform initial excess pore pressure. It is
the simplest case of consolidation is the one – dimensional problem in
which: -
1. The total stress is constant with time ,
2. The initial excess pore pressure is uniform with depth
3. There is a drainage at both the top and bottom of the consolidating layer.
 For an element of soil at a particular depth (z) in the clay layer, the
progress of consolidation process under a particular total stress
increment can be expressed in terms of voids ratio.
eo  e
Uz 
e o  e1
 where: -
Uz : the degree of consolidation at a particular instant of time at depth (z),
eo: void ratio before the start of consolidation,
e1: void ratio after the start of consolidation,
e: void ratio at any specific time.

 If (e – s’) curve is assumed

to be linear over the stress
range in question as shown
in figure: -
s   s o
Uz 
s 1  s o

 Terzaghi's Solution
The general solution is obtained for an
overall (average) degree of consolidation
(Uav) using non-dimensional factors.
Settlement at any Time

Average Degree of Consolidation (Uav) 
Total Consolidat ion Sett . ( Final )

(Uav) versus time factor (Tv)

Uave, % 50 60 70 80 90
Tv 0.197 0.287 0.403 0.567 0.848
When Ut < 0.6, use Tv = (p/4).U2

When Ut > 0.6, use:
Tv = 1.781 – 0.933. Log (100 – U)

Time Factor (Tv):
1. An open layer, a permeable layer both above and below (d = H/2)

2. A half-closed layer, a permeable layer either above or below (d = H)
3. Vertical sand drains, horizontal drainage (d = L/2).

Example 4: for the information of Ex. 2, find the settlement six months
after fill application.
Total Sc=
Find U at six months use figure or equations
Tv = (Cv.t/d2)
Tv = (0.5*0.5/1.752) =
From figure, U =
Sc time
U  100
Sc total
Sc6 months = U * Sctotal =

Example 5: A 5m thick saturated soil stratum has a compression index of 0.25
and coefficient of permeability 3.2x10-3 mm/sec. if the void ration is 1.9 at
vertical stress of 0.15 N/mm2, compute the void ratio when the vertical stress is
increased to 0.2 N/mm2. Also calculate settlement due to above stress increase
and time required for 50% consolidation.
SOL. (Cc=(eo-e1)/(logs1-logso),
e1=1.869,
Sc=53.8mm,
Tv = 0.196,
mv=(eo-e1)/(1+eo).1/(s1-so)= 0.214 mm2/N,
Cv=k/(mv.gw) = 1524 mm2/sec,
t= 53.58 min.)

Example 6: A soil sample 20mm thick takes 20 minutes to reach 20%

consolidation. Find the time taken for a clay layer 6m thick to reach 40%
consolidation. Assume double drainage in both cases.
SOL.
U=20%,
Tv=0.0314,
Cv=2.617x10-3 mm2/sec,
U=40%,
Tv=0.1257,
t=13 years 258.343 days)

For the cases of non

uniform initial excess pore
pressure, for finite loading,
the average degree of
consolidation is
determining from figure (3)
as shown below, each
curve represent some
cases of initial excess pore
pressure as in table below.

Solution Using Parabolic Isochrones

(Consolidation + Time + Depth)
The following non-dimensional factors are used in order to obtain a solution: -
Degree of consolidation at depth z ue

Uz  1 
ui
Time factor
Drainage path ratio


2- For soil profile shown in figure below . A clay layer whose total consolidation settlement under
a given fill is expected to be 20 cm. Find the excess pore water pressure and effective stress
(due to fill) at points A,B,C and D for cases
i. Immediately after application of the fill.
ii. After 20 months of fill application .If the consolidation settlement after 2 months is 4
cm.
iii. After final consolidation was achieved.
5m Fill g=20 kN/m3
2m gsat.=18 kN/m3 Sand W.T

×
A
5m
Clay
10 m ×B gsat.=21 kN/m3
×C
2.5 m
× D
2m gsat.=18 kN/m3 Sand

Determination of Cv From Test Results
1- The Root-Time method

Determination of Cv From Test Results
2- The Log-Time method

EX: The final consolidation settlement of a layer of clay 5.0 m thick is calculated to be
280mm. The coefficient of consolidation for the loading range is 0.955 mm²/min. There is
two-way drainage, upward and downward. Calculate the time required for (a) 90%
consolidation settlement, (b) a settlement of 100 mm.
(a) Drainage path length, d = 5.0/2 = 2.50 m = 2500 mm

For U90, T90 = 0.848. Then
(b) For 100 mm settlement, Ut = 100/280 = 0.357

and since Ut < 0.6, Tv = 0.357² x p/4 = 0.100
Then time for 100mm settlement

SECONDARY COMPRESSION OR CREEP
In some soils (especially recent

organic soils) one-dimensional
compression continues under
constant loading after all of the
excess pore pressure has
dissipated, i.e. after primary
consolidation has ceased - this is
called secondary compression or
creep.

QUESTIONS
1- A 20 mm thick soil sample requires 4 minute to reach 30% degree of consolidation

under two way drainage condition. What will be the time required (in months) to reach 50
% consolidation of 8m thick clay layer of the same properties under two way drainage
condition. (use equations
W.T N.G.S
2 - A temporary fill of 200 kN/m2 were placed on the
surface of the soil shown in figure below. After final
consolidation was achieved, the fill removed and a circular 4m Sand g sat.=18.5 kN/m3
footing (5 m) in diameter was constructed at 2 m below the
ground surface. Estimate
i. Total consolidation settlement due to fill. gsat.=19 kN/m3,OCR=1
ii. Total consolidation settlement after 85 days of fill Cv=3.533 m2/month
5m clay
application. eo=0.95 , Cc=0.3 , Cr=0.05
iii. Total heave of the soil surface after of the fill (fill were
removed).
iv. Total consolidation settlement due to footing when Rock
uniform pressure of 100 kN/m2 on the footing surface.
QUESTIONS
3- A saturated soil sample 20 mm thick was tested in an Oedometer (double drainage)
under a stress increment of 100 kn/m2. the sample had compressed by 1.5 mm at t90
which was 24 minutes after stressing. Calculate the coefficient of volume change (mv), the
coefficient of consolidation (cv).
4- A bed of sand 10m thick is underlain by a compressible layer of clay 3 m thick under
which lies sand. The water table is at a depth of 4 m below the ground surface. The total
unit weights of sand below and above the water table are 20.5 and 17.7 kN/m3
respectively. The clay has a natural water content of 42%, liquid limit 46% and specific
gravity 2.76. Assuming the clay to be normally consolidated, estimate the probable final
settlement under an average excess pressure of 100 kN/m2.

QUESTIONS
5- For soil profile consists of three layers, top layer, sand soil with unit weight of
17 kN/m3, and thickness of 2 meters, mid layer, clay soil with unit weight of 19
kN/m3, eo=0.9, Cc=0.2, OCR=1.5, and thickness of 5 meters, bottom layer,
sand soil with unit weight of 17 kN/m3, and thickness of 6 meters. Water table at
one meter from surface level.
i. Estimate the total consolidation settlement, caused by application of
square footing of 3 meters each side, and q=200 kN/m2.
ii. the change in total consolidation settlement if the water table level
lowered two meters,
iii.Estimate the time required, in months, to achieve 50% degree of
consolidation, what is the consolidation settlement?

CH8 Consolidation SoilMech - Sett PDF

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originaltitel

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

CH8 Consolidation SoilMech - Sett PDF

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Asst. Prof. Dr.

Mohammed Shaker Al Shakerchy

SOIL MECHANICS LECTURES by Dr. Mohammed Sh. M. Al Shakerchy 2

Total Settlement Settlement vs Time

SOIL MECHANICS LECTURES by Dr. Mohammed Sh. M. Al Shakerchy 4

There are three variables:

Main assumptions of the theory: -

SOIL MECHANICS LECTURES by Dr. Mohammed Sh. M. Al Shakerchy 7

SOIL MECHANICS LECTURES by Dr. Mohammed Sh. M. Al Shakerchy 8

rate of settlement may

SOIL MECHANICS LECTURES by Dr. Mohammed Sh. M. Al Shakerchy 10

from typical plot of (e-s’): av in (cm2/kg)

Expansion Index (Ce) or Unloading

Assuming the condition of no lateral strain, Ds = Ds’ dZ dSc

eo  e1  s1  so  H

SOIL MECHANICS LECTURES by Dr. Mohammed Sh. M. Al Shakerchy 13

SOIL MECHANICS LECTURES by Dr. Mohammed Sh. M. Al Shakerchy 15

1m Sand, g=14 kN/m3 W.T.

SOIL MECHANICS LECTURES by Dr. Mohammed Sh. M. Al Shakerchy 16

sc  so : Normally Consolidated Clay (N.C.)

sc  so : Pre-consolidated Clay (Over-Consolidated, O.C.)

sc  so : Under Consolidation

Rc = OCR = sc so … Over-Consolidation Ratio

s’o s’c Log s'

SOIL MECHANICS LECTURES by Dr. Mohammed Sh. M. Al Shakerchy 18

1. when sc  so

SOIL MECHANICS LECTURES by Dr. Mohammed Sh. M. Al Shakerchy 19

2. when sc  so

Cr.H  s c  Cc.H  sc  Ds  

SOIL MECHANICS LECTURES by Dr. Mohammed Sh. M. Al Shakerchy 20

SOIL MECHANICS LECTURES by Dr. Mohammed Sh. M. Al Shakerchy 21

SOIL MECHANICS LECTURES by Dr. Mohammed Sh. M. Al Shakerchy 22

SOIL MECHANICS LECTURES by Dr. Mohammed Sh. M. Al Shakerchy 23

The equations of total consolidation settlement do not provide any

SOIL MECHANICS LECTURES by Dr. Mohammed Sh. M. Al Shakerchy 24

SOIL MECHANICS LECTURES by Dr. Mohammed Sh. M. Al Shakerchy 26

SOIL MECHANICS LECTURES by Dr. Mohammed Sh. M. Al Shakerchy 27

 If (e – s’) curve is assumed

SOIL MECHANICS LECTURES by Dr. Mohammed Sh. M. Al Shakerchy 28

Settlement at any Time

SOIL MECHANICS LECTURES by Dr. Mohammed Sh. M. Al Shakerchy 29

(Uav) versus time factor (Tv)

When Ut < 0.6, use Tv = (p/4).U2

SOIL MECHANICS LECTURES by Dr. Mohammed Sh. M. Al Shakerchy 30

Time Factor (Tv):

1. An open layer, a permeable layer both above and below (d = H/2)

SOIL MECHANICS LECTURES by Dr. Mohammed Sh. M. Al Shakerchy 31

SOIL MECHANICS LECTURES by Dr. Mohammed Sh. M. Al Shakerchy 32

SOIL MECHANICS LECTURES by Dr. Mohammed Sh. M. Al Shakerchy 33

Example 6: A soil sample 20mm thick takes 20 minutes to reach 20%

SOIL MECHANICS LECTURES by Dr. Mohammed Sh. M. Al Shakerchy 34

For the cases of non

SOIL MECHANICS LECTURES by Dr. Mohammed Sh. M. Al Shakerchy 35

Solution Using Parabolic Isochrones

Degree of consolidation at depth z ue

Drainage path ratio

SOIL MECHANICS LECTURES by Dr. Mohammed Sh. M. Al Shakerchy 36

SOIL MECHANICS LECTURES by Dr. Mohammed Sh. M. Al Shakerchy 37

2m gsat.=18 kN/m3 Sand W.T

SOIL MECHANICS LECTURES by Dr. Mohammed Sh. M. Al Shakerchy 38

SOIL MECHANICS LECTURES by Dr. Mohammed Sh. M. Al Shakerchy 39

2- The Log-Time method

SOIL MECHANICS LECTURES by Dr. Mohammed Sh. M. Al Shakerchy 40