ALBERCA

BALASON
CANERO
COYOCA
DE CASTRO,
FERNANDO
 DE CASTRO,
JOHN
LALA, ANTHONY
LALA, CHARLES
LAYNO
PUMICPIC
QUEVEDO
SANCHEZ
SARAUSAD
TELLO
VILLARINA
 ALONTO
AQUINO
ARANAS
CAPAYCAPAY
CHANG
COL
DELAURO
LABORTE
MONTILLA
MORENO
NAMAN
NIMENZO
 OCSABO
PEDRABLANCA
PEPITO
PLAZA
ROSALES
SALIMBOT
SAMPAYAN
SUNGA
TINDOY
TOLENTINO
Group
Date

Research 1 - Oral Defense Rubrics

Research Content 50%

2 pts 3 pts 4 pts 5 pts score
1. Title ContradictSome errors
Title is we exemplary, well formulated ttle at anexpert level.
5%
2. Researc Evidence presented does not support the
10%
 Main Criteria Score

Reported clearly and is

Report it generally clear complete. All findins were
Clarity of report needs and complete. All
Findings and report it incomplete improvement. All findings were finding presented in a pleasant and
were well stated
Recommendation and is not clear. (3 stated. Minor errors in table and in an appropriate exceptonal format. Graphs
way
(15 Points) pts) and table were attractve and
graph format. (7 pts) and in a good format. professionally presented. (15
(13 pts) pts)

speaker uses a clear, audible voice. (1 pts)

Delivery is poised, controlled, and smooth. (1 Pts)
Oral Presentation
(5 pts) Good language skills and pronounciaton are used. (1pts)
Visual aids are well prepared, informatve, effectve, and not distractng. (1pts)
Length of presentaton is within the assigned tme limits. (1pt)
Total Sore
Remarks: