Sie sind auf Seite 1von 2

Criteria for Validating the Research Instrument

(By: Good and Scates)

Kindly rate the instrument for “_______title of the


study_____” based on the criteria set forth by Carter V.
Good and Douglas E. Scates, with the following criteria:

4- Excellent; 3- Very Good; 2-Good;1-Needs Improvement.

Criteria 4 3 2 1
1 Are the questions on the subject?
2 Are the question perfectly clear and un ambiguous?
Do the questions get at something stable, well-
considered, non-superficial and non-ephemeral but
3
something which is typical of the individual or of the
situation?
Do the questions pull or have or extractive power
4 that is.. it will be respondents to by a large enough
proportion of respondents?
Do the responses shown reasonable range of
5
variation?
Is the information obtained consistent? Does it agree
6
with what is known?
7 Are the items sufficiently inclusive?
Is there a possibility of using an external criterion to
8
evaluate the questionnaire?

Average __Ave_ - Interpretaion

Comments/Suggestions and Modifications:


_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________

__________________________________
Validator’s Signature over Printed Name
2

Criteria for Validating the Research Instrument


CONSOLIDATED RESULT
(By: Good and Scates)

Kindly rate the instrument for “_______title of the


study_____” based on the criteria set forth by Carter V.
Good and Douglas E. Scates, with the following criteria:

4- Excellent; 3- Very Good; 2-Good;1-Needs Improvement.

Criteria Juror 1 Juror 2 Juror 3

1 Are the questions on the subject?

2 Are the question perfectly clear and un ambiguous?


Do the questions get at something stable, well-
considered, non-superficial and non-ephemeral but
3
something which is typical of the individual or of the
situation?
Do the questions pull or have or extractive power
4 that is.. it will be respondents to by a large enough
proportion of respondents?
Do the responses shown reasonable range of
5
variation?
Is the information obtained consistent? Does it agree
6
with what is known?

7 Are the items sufficiently inclusive?

Is there a possibility of using an external criterion to


8
evaluate the questionnaire?

Average __Ave_ - Interpretaion

Comments/Suggestions and Modifications:


_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________

__________________________________
Validator’s Signature over Printed Name