Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
CSTP Element(s) Focus for POP Cycle (In semesters 2, 3, 4, copy pertinent elements from ILP for POP Cycle focus.)
1 - Emerging 2 - Exploring 3 - Applying 4 - Integrating 5 – Innovating
NT pedagogical skills are newly formed and Skills are developing as NT investigates Skills are applied as NT makes Skills are refined as NT combines elements Skills are polished as NT expands ability to
just coming into prominence and examines pedagogical practices increased relevant and suitable use into a cohesive and unified pedagogical add new methods and strategies into
of pedagogical choices repertoire pedagogical repertoire
CSTP Element Initial Rating Rating Description (Identify both teacher and student rating for CSTP 1 and 2.)
Explore using additional real-life connections to subject matter in
single lessons or sequence of lessons to support understanding.
Connecting subject matter to
1.3 2
meaningful, real-life contexts
Students make use of real-life connections provided in single lessons or
sequence of lessons to support understanding of subject matter.
Explores additional instructional strategies, resources, and
Using a variety of instructional technologies in single lessons or sequence of lessons to meet students’
strategies, resources, and diverse learning needs.
1.4 2
technologies to meet students’
diverse learning needs Students participate in single lessons or sequence of lessons related to
their interests and experiences.
Section 2: Pre-Observation Conference
Part A: NT Reflection Part B: ME Feedback
Use questions to guide reflection on the lesson plan. Provide feedback on lesson plan reflection.
Inquiry Focus: Pre-assessment, goal-setting,
It is essential to use vocabulary in context to
differentiation
Inquiry Focus/Special Emphasis gain a stronger understanding. It will be
Inquiry Question: How will asking students to
What is your inquiry focus and/or special emphasis? interesting to see if it works in this particular
How will you incorporate the inquiry focus and/or include key vocabulary in a technology project of
special emphasis into the lesson? assignment.
What specific feedback do you want from your ME? their choosing using resources online or offline
Giving students choice should also have a
increase students’ comprehension of the
positive influence on their comprehension.
vocabulary?
Focus Student 1: English Learner Focus Student 2: Student w/ILP/504 Focus Student 3: Your Choice
Focus Students
Summarize critical needs and how N.M. – Generally well behaved and S.T.- low performing student J.H. - Frequently off-task,
you will address them during this diligent student. English learner placed in leveled small-groups in somewhat low performing in
lesson.
from Spanish-speaking household. other subjects other subjects
POP Cycle, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017. Adapted from CSU Fullerton Titan EDUCATOR Project, 2017. Page 1 of 7
Have you considered asking the students
directly how they would like to present the
material? Each student and his/her needs are
unique and I am not sure there is a “generic”
Are there any recommendations for what kind project that would work for all of them.
of hand-made projects students with needs for Similarly, it is difficult to make a generic
What specific feedback regarding your focus students
do you want from your ME? differentiation might be more successful in? By statement regarding technology. It is a valuable
experience, is the use of technology for these tool for some students, and more of a challenge
students challenging? for others. Overall, learning about each student
and his/her needs will help you better meet their
needs. Giving them choices, and specifically
allowing them to design (with your approval) a
project should yield the best results.
Typically, this can be effective. However, you
do run the risk of students “copying” your
Specific Feedback
How effective is a teacher-modeled project and not be creative in their own right. It
What additional specific feedback do you want from presentation for showing what a final-product is beneficial to give extremely clear
your ME regarding lesson implementation?
should look like? guidelines/rubric so the students know what you
are looking for, and should you decide, showing
a final product could be helpful.
Opening:
Main Lesson:
Good opening to catch their attention with a
2. Teacher presentation on what I am thankful song.
for: “Doy Gracias por…” Have you ever thought about meeting with the
Instructional Planning
How is the lesson structured (opening, body, and students in small groups at some point in this
-check for understanding, turn and pair-share
closing)? lesson? Everything is whole group/partner talk.
What varied teaching strategies and differentiated -Q&A with ‘muy bien’ incentive tickets
instruction will help students meet lesson goals? Could you have them rotate to see you in
What progress monitoring strategies will be used? 3. Explain Choice Board/Playlist projects for pairs/small groups to share/discuss/ask questions
How will results inform instruction? expressing ‘Gracias’/Thanks (choice of 4 tasks) about their project. Maybe you could
-direct students to choose one project they will incorporate that after this initial day of
be comfortable in creating decisions.
4. Share with a partner choice task project
- reflect on what they are thankful for
-review laptop-accessible resources (royalty-
free images site predetermined, Powerpoint,
Spanish notebook on Onenote, …)
5. Students create project using laptop-
accessible resources
POP Cycle, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017. Adapted from CSU Fullerton Titan EDUCATOR Project, 2017. Page 2 of 7
Closure:
-Student projects/Items will be presented,
displayed depending on type of project chosen
during later class session
The differentiated product approach My demo video was very useful both
was benefical. They appeared to be for showing what the end product
Students were engaged with the
Specific Feedback excited to do the project in their own
What information can you
differentiated product approach. should be, and also preventative
way.
provide the NT regarding They appeared to be excited to do discipline. In other classes where I
requested special
feedback? the project in their own way. previously did this lesson, students
Your video was an effective
example of what you would like to misused their time creating videos
see from that choice of product. that did not follow their given
directions at all. That was
eliminated with a short warning and
sample video to help them get
started.
Students were engaged in the
singing and when they were
Starting class in song got the I feel that during some class
working. However, they were not
students engaged and excited. You sessions, I ‘pre-load’ the students
as engaged (a lot of side
were supportive to all students – with a lot of information and repeat
CSTP 1: Engaging All conversation) during the whole
Students allowing for whole group questions often for emphasis before letting
In what ways were students
group time of giving directions.
first, then meeting with individual them get started on an activity. I get
engaged? How were Students did contribute to their
students and finally by walking
students not engaged?
How did students contribute
learning when they were able to overly concerned about the
around the room to keep all students
to their learning? work individually – then they were potential for discipline problems and
How did teacher and/or on task. You were able to check
excited and engaged to create their minimize them by doing so. But I do
students monitor learning? each student’s progress and address
How were the focus project. see that I lose those students already
students engaged and individual needs as you went around
supported throughout the the room. eager to begin by keeping my
lesson? Students did (almost) complete a explanations long. I might have seen
Focus students were engaged and
project saying 5 things they are more finished products at the end of
interested in creating their
thankful for in Spanish. Students this session with less explaining.
individualized projects.
had options on how to create the
project.
POP Cycle, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017. Adapted from CSU Fullerton Titan EDUCATOR Project, 2017. Page 3 of 7
One advantage of having my own
room to teach in now this year is
being able to change around my
Your classroom is set up in a Students took advantage of the student desks and assigned seating
CSTP 2: Effective Learning conducive manner. Students are in group seating at times, but for the arrangement as needed. For this
Environment groups allowing them to work majority of the class they were lesson, I used groups of 5 desks with
How did students and
teacher contribute to an
collaboratively as well as focused. When working 4 students in a group, leaving the
effective learning independently. independently, they were quietly center desk in each group
environment?
You allow students to ask questions talking, but remained engaged in the unoccupied for me to easily switch
and are patient with them. project. from group to group and student to
student. It is my most helpful
seating for differentiating and
assisting students.
Some students did seem to need
much more review that what we had
done in the previous lesson, mostly
the newest students to the school.
Even though I assured them that
following my sample sentence
The lesson assumed students had a
vast knowledge of the subject matter pattern would help them with
(they had to know how to say the grammatically correct sentences,
words they were thankful for in they still looked a little unsure. It is
CSTP 3: Organizing why I gave them a sample finished
Subject Matter Spanish). Could you have asked
What actions of the NT students for examples and put them Students had to do their own product for each choice on the
contributed to student
assimilation of subject on the board or supplied a list of learning of new terms to write what choiceboard, and the main sentence
matter? examples? You had to individually they are thankful for during this pattern could be found in many
How did students construct
knowledge of subject help some students construct these lesson. A more direct review of places in my lesson (including in one
matter? sentences, so it would have been vocabulary would have been
What misconceptions did
song). I reminded them to use
students have and how beneficial to provide whole group helpful. vocabulary they already knew,
were they addressed by
the teacher?
instruction on this. A verbal (found in their digital Spanish
explanation was not as effective. As notebook in OneNote) but also
you stated, Google translate is not provided them with a couple of word
the best resource, but it appeared to lists online focused on the topic of
be their only one other than you.
being thankful. For some students, it
was a question of self-confidence in
their writing ability. In looking
around at their work and checking it
afterward, they seemed to do really
well!
Differentiation by product was
supported during the lesson. You
could have differentiated the lesson
more fully by giving different
students different projects based on
skill level. Students were supported
to complete the project of their Students were engaged and
CSTP 4: Learning choice. participating in the completing of
Experiences
How were students You walking the room and helping the project.
supported through students was beneficial. If you had I will look into having such a check-in
differentiated instruction?
How did students more time, it would have been good Most students asked questions as process in similar future lessons.
participate? to call 1-2 students back to you at a needed, but what about those that
How did the NT contribute
to student learning? time to discuss where they were in did not? A check in process would
their project. Another idea would be be beneficial.
to have them come up with their five
things they are thankful for, have
you approve it, then have them write
the sentences and show you before
finally creating the project using
those first 2 steps. When seeing it in
POP Cycle, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017. Adapted from CSU Fullerton Titan EDUCATOR Project, 2017. Page 4 of 7
action, it appears they needed steps
to be approved as they went along.
All parts of this form should be transcribed (typed; not hand-written) into a single document and submitted to course instructor.
Information from this POP Cycle should be summarized on the NT ILP as appropriate.
POP Cycle, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017. Adapted from CSU Fullerton Titan EDUCATOR Project, 2017. Page 5 of 7
Instructional Lesson Plan
Content Area(s)/Course/Grade: Unit: Week 3+4 November
Spanish K-4th
Lesson Topic: ‘Doy Gracias’, I give thanks Date: Nov. 13, 2018
Outcome(s)/Expectation(s): Students will learn about and understand/be able to use expressions
and vocabulary related to gratitude, thanks, and appreciation (variation/extension of expressions of
greeting)
according to the situation, relating to Thanksgiving holiday.
Student Indicator(s):
Be able to correctly say or write expressions of thanks in a greeting card, presentation or prayer of
their own creation
Standards addressed:
CA World Language Content Standards Stage 1,
1.1 Students address discrete elements of daily life, including:
e. Celebrations, holidays, and rites of passage
ISTE Standards
3. Knowledge Constructor
Students critically curate a variety of resources using digital tools to construct knowledge, produce creative
artifacts and make meaningful learning experiences for themselves and others.
Students:
c. curate information from digital resources using a variety of tools and methods to create collections of
artifacts that demonstrate meaningful connections or conclusions.
Instructional Delivery
Opening Activities/Motivation:
Procedures:
4. Share with a partner choice task project, laptop-accessible resources (Powerpoint, royalty-free
images, Onenote, …) (5 min)
POP Cycle, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017. Adapted from CSU Fullerton Titan EDUCATOR Project, 2017. Page 6 of 7
5. Students create project using laptop-accessible resources (20 min over two sessions)
6. Teacher will visit students in pairs to ask about project they have chosen, advise/assist if needed
Assessment/Evaluation (Formative/Summative)
Use 1-4 scale rubric to evaluate project based on Spanish language use, clarity and neatness, use of
technology resources, inclusion of at least 5 things expressing appreciation/thanks for
Closure:
Items will be presented, displayed depending on type of project chosen during later class session.
Students will be able to say/list what they are thankful for in Spanish. (10 min over 2 sessions)
POP Cycle, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017. Adapted from CSU Fullerton Titan EDUCATOR Project, 2017. Page 7 of 7