Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Approval
TAB AIAG # PPAP Requirement Date Approver
1&2 The part name and part number are correct as recorded on this warrant
Comments:
3 Shown on Drawing #: Is the drawing that specifies the customer part # being submitted.
Comments:
4 The engineering level is correct and the correct date
Comments:
5 Additional engineering changes have been identified correctly
*Authorized Changes not yet incorporated in drawing but in part*
Comments:
6 The safety item box is marked correctly
Comments:
7 The Supplier Quote matches the SRG Global Purchase Order and meets all
print requirements. * Supplier to verify with SRG Global purchasing group *
Comments:
8 Part Weight: Enter the actual part weight in kilograms to four decimal places
Comments:
9 Checking Aid No.: Enter check aid number if applicable.
Comments:
10 Engineering Change Level: Identify current revision and approval date.
Comments:
11 Supplier Name & Code: Show the code assigned to the mfg location on the PO.
Comments:
12 Supplier Mfg Address: Is where the product was manufactured.
Comments:
13-16 Submission Information: Has been completed. (#16 if available)
Comments:
17 Reason for submission has been completed.
Comments:
18 The PPAP is at the Requested Submission Level per SRG Global instructions
Comments:
19-20 Submission Results pass and have been completed.
Comments:
21-22 The declaration has been properly completed and signed by an appropriate
supplier representative.
Comments:
N/A 0
REJECTED 0
Date Reviewed S
Reviewed By S COMPLETED 0
Safety and/or
Government Regulation Yes No Purchase Order No. Weight (kg)
MATERIALS REPORTING
Has customer-required Substances of Concern information been reported? Yes No n/a
Are polymeric parts identified with appropriate ISO marking codes? Yes No n/a
Level 2 - Warrant with product samples and limited supporting data submitted to customer.
Level 3 - Warrant with product samples and complete supporting data submitted to customer.
Level 5 - Warrant with product samples and complete supporting data reviewed at suppliers manufacturing location.
SUBMISSION RESULTS
The results for dimensional measurements material and functional test appearance criteria statistical
These results meet all design record requirements: Yes No (If "No" - Explanation Required)
Mold / Cavity / Production Process __________________________
DECLARATION
I affirm that the samples represented by this warrant are representative of our parts, and have been madeby a process that meets all Production Part
Approval Process Manual 4th Edition Requirements. I further affirm that these samples were produced at the rate of _____ / ___ hours.
I also certifiy that documented evidence of such compliance is on file and available for review. I have noted any deviations from this declaration below.
EXPLANATION/COMMENTS:
Title E-mail
Completed
Drawing (Design) Record Checklist Yes No N/A
N/A 0
NO - REJECTED 0
Date Reviewed S
Reviewed by S COMPLETED 0
Completed
Engineering Change Document Checklist Yes No N/A
1 There are authorized engineering changes not yet recorded in the drawing.
*Customer Signed Approved Red Marked Up Drawing Required along with change documents*
Comments:
2 This submission includes an approved Supplier Request for Product Change.
Comments:
N/A 0
NO - REJECTED 0
Date Reviewed S
Reviewed by S COMPLETED 0
Completed
Customer Engineering Approval Checklist Yes No N/A
N/A 0
NO - REJECTED 0
Date Reviewed S
Reviewed by S COMPLETED 0
Completed
Design FMEA Checklist Yes No N/A
NOTE: If SRG Global is design responsible for the DFMEA and does not
supply it to the supplier, the supplier must review this with SRG Global.
It is the policy of SRG Global not to release hard copies.
7 Appropriate corrective actions have been taken/planned for high severity numbers and risk
numbers were revised when design change was completed.
Comments:
8 High risk priorities have been revised when corrective actions have been
completed and verified.
Comments:
9 Where required, SRG Global and/or the Customer have reviewed and
accepted the DFMEA
Comments:
10 Significant Characteristics are identified and captured within the DFMEA.
Comments:
N/A 0
NO - REJECTED 0
Date Reviewed S
Reviewed by S COMPLETED 0
Completed
Process Flow Diagram Checklist Yes No N/A
N/A 0
NO - REJECTED 0
Date Reviewed S
Reviewed by S COMPLETED 0
Completed
Process FMEA Checklist Yes No N/A
N/A 0
NO - REJECTED 0
Date Reviewed S
Reviewed By S COMPLETED 0
Completed
Dimensional Results Checklist Yes No N/A
Comments:
SEE THE FOLLOWING TAB 8 DIM SHEET FOR EXAMPLE
N/A 0
NO - REJECTED 0
Date Reviewed S
Reviewed by S COMPLETED 0
March CFG-1003
2006
PPAP Submission Checklist Tab 9
Completed
Material Performance, Test Results Checklist Yes No N/A
1 All tests have been performed for all parts, product materials as defined on
the drawing and/or control plan.
(A table of contents should be included to identify the tests included)
Comments:
2 The quantity tested and the actual results of each test are listed in a
convenient format referencing the test specification/ requirement. A copy
of the specification is included.
Comments:
3 The record includes the rev. level of the parts tested, the date and change
level of all specifications and a description of the test method/ test
equipment used to conduct the test.
Comments:
4 If testing was performed by a subcontractor, the name, address, contact
information and supplier code number for the material from the customer-
approved subcontractor list. (where required)
Comments:
5 Performance tests were conducted and the results of each test are listed in
a convenient format.
(A table of contents should be included to identify the tests included)
Comments:
6 PV testing has been completed?
Comments:
7 All test results indicate each test has successfully met the test criteria
Comments:
8 Engineering approval is included for any/all tests that did not pass, were
conducted in an alternate test method, were conducted in an unapproved
test laboratory or anywhere tests were excluded or waived.
Comments:
9 Raw material meets all print requirements and the certification has been
included with in the PPAP.
Comments:
10 Regrind percentage (If applicable) has been identified and agreed to by
SRG Global (Provide Documentation).
Comments:
N/A 0
NO - REJECTED 0
Date Reviewed S
Reviewed by S COMPLETED 0
March CFG-1004
2006
Production Part Approval
Material Test Results
March CFG-1004
2006
PPAP Submission Checklist Tab 10
Completed
Initial Process Study Checklist Yes No N/A
1 The initial process studies were conducted using the required number of
samples and using production processing, gauging and materials.
(Verify for all features requiring process studies comply)
Comments:
2 The studies were conducted on PPAP samples and use PpK as the index.
Comments:
3 The studies were conducted using production level parts CpK is the index.
Comments:
4 The studies were conducted using AIAG approved attribute studies.
Comments:
5 The supplier has identified any/all unstable processes and has submitted
corrective actions approved by customer. NOTE: Approval must be obtained
prior to any submission.
Comments:
6 The process has a one-sided specification or non-normal distribution and
alternative acceptance criteria was approved by the customer.
Comments:
7 Acceptance criteria has been satisfied and data indicates all studies comply.
(PpK- 1.67 CpK- 1.33 per current AIAG guidelines or as approved by
customer)
Comments:
8 Acceptance criteria has not been satisfied and customer approval and the
corrective action plans are included.
Comments:
N/A 0
NO - REJECTED 0
Date Reviewed S
Reviewed by S COMPLETED 0
Completed
Measurement Systems Analysis Studies Checklist Yes No N/A
N/A 0
NO - REJECTED 0
Date Reviewed S
Reviewed by S COMPLETED 0
Completed
Qualified Laboratory Documentation Checklist Yes No N/A
N/A 0
NO - REJECTED 0
Date Reviewed S
Reviewed by S COMPLETED 0
Completed
Control Plan/ Work Instructions/ Visual Aides Checklist Yes No N/A
Completed
Appearance Approval Report Checklist (Components Only) Yes No N/A
All applicable AAR approvals must be granted before full PPAP is granted and before the Supplier
is allowed to ship material for production.
N/A 0
NO - REJECTED 0
Date Reviewed S
Reviewed by S COMPLETED 0
Completed
Bulk Materials Requirements Checklist-Example: Resin, Paint Etc. Yes No N/A
N/A 0
NO - REJECTED 0
Date Reviewed S
Reviewed by S COMPLETED 0
Completed
Sample Product Checklist-Retained at SRG Global Yes No N/A
N/A 0
NO - REJECTED 0
Date Reviewed S
Reviewed by S COMPLETED 0
Completed
Master Sample Checklist-Retained at the Supplier Yes No N/A
1 The Master Sample for this PPAP will be retained for the same period of time
as the PPAP records or until a new master sample is produced for the same
customer part number for customer approval.
Comments:
2 The master sample is identified with approval date and any reference info
required to allow correlation with the PPAP package and the related PPAP
data and records.
Comments:
3 A master sample is available for each cavity of the tool if required.
Comments:
N/A 0
REJECTED 0
Date Reviewed S
Reviewed by S COMPLETED 0
Completed
Checking Aides, fixtures, test stands, Mylar Checklist Yes No N/A
1 All product specific checking aides, fixtures, test stands and Mylar have
been listed in this PPAP submission along with qualification data for
each of those devices.
Comments:
2 The supplier has certified that all aspects of each of these devices agree with
part dimensional requirements and are properly listed where applicable on
the control plan.
Comments:
3 All engineering changes have been incorporated into the checking aides.
Comments:
4 The supplier has provided for preventive maintenance for the checking
aides.
Comments:
5 The supplier has included these checking aides in the gage R&R studies
identified in Tab11 of this PPAP submission.
Comments:
N/A 0
NO - REJECTED 0
Date Reviewed S
Reviewed by S COMPLETED 0
Completed
IMDS/RSMS Evidence/Compliance Checklist Yes No N/A
PPAP Approval CAN NOT be granted until ALL items in this section
are fully satisfied and documented. Submit to SRG Global IMDS #9949 & 3905.
N/A 0
NO - REJECTED 0
Date Reviewed S
Reviewed By S COMPLETED 0
Completed
NAFTA/Certificate of origin (North America Requirement Only) Yes No N/A
*NOTE* If you have questions or concerns about this documentation please contact Megan Cummings
at (954) 942-2114; fax (954) 514-9022; email: mcummings@intertradelaw.com. You must
email the completed NAFTA form, print and Material Certificate of Analysis to Megan Cummings for review.
Once approved she will send an email confirmation of approval. At aminimum the email cofirmation from Intertrade law
to your company stating your documents have been received, reviewed and approved must accompnay this PPAP.
At a
minimum an
N/A 0
Date
Reviewed NO - REJECTED 0
Reviewed By S
S COMPLETED 0
Completed
Contingency Plan/ Lot Control & Traceability Checklist Yes No N/A
1 The guidelines for the AIAG M-12 criteria have been satisfied
Comments:
2 The lot control/traceability process for this product has been prepared
and is included in this PPAP and has been approved by the customer
where required.
Comments:
3 The supplier has tested the lot control/traceability system and the
results are enclosed in this PPAP.
Comments:
4 An Emergency Contact has been included in this PPAP and includes
off hours contact information.
Comments:
N/A 0
NO - REJECTED 0
Date Reviewed S
Reviewed By S COMPLETED 0
Completed
Process Approval/ Run@Rate Checklist Yes No N/A
1 The Run@Rate or equivalent process trial run has been completed and
has demonstrated the supplier's ability to meet all quoted capacity and
quality requirements.
Comments:
2 The Run@Rate study was based on a significant production run as agreed
upon with the customer.
Comments:
3 Any/all unexpected quality fallout has been evaluated and reflected in
the PFMEA and Control Plan. (regardless of failure rate)
Comments:
N/A 0
NO - REJECTED 0
Date Reviewed S
Reviewed By S COMPLETED 0
Customer Buyer
Phone#
Planned Usage: Daily Weekly SQE
Phone#
7.1. Documentation
At the time of the Run @ Rate, the following support documentation should be available for review:
Available YE
7.1.1. Appropriate PPAP package information
7.1.2. Quoted tool capacity and planned machine loading information
7.2.1. Is the product being manufactured at the production site using the production tooling,
gaging, process, materials, operators, environment, and process settings?
Comments:
7.2.2. Does the actual process flow agree with the process flow diagram, as documented in
PPAP? (Review the facility plan and layout. Walk the process with the flow diagram.)
Comments:
7.2.3. Are operator instructions/visual aids available and adhered to at each workstation?
Comments:
0
Comments:
0
7.2.5. When required, are production boundary samples available at required workstations?
Does SRG Global systems approve the boundary samples?
Comments:
7.2.6. Are maintenance plans in place? Are repair and maintenance parts available? Is there
planned downtime for preventative maintenance?
Comments:
7.3.1. Can net output from each operation support quoted tool capacity?
Comments:
Comments:
7.3.4. Does the net throughput of good pieces (scrap taken out, any allowable rework) meet daily
quoted tool capacity?
Comments:
7.4.1. Are all production checking fixtures complete, with acceptable measurement system
studies (e.g., gage R and R) performed, and operator instructions/visual aids available?
Comments:
7.4.2. Are all in process gaging and controls complete, functional and in place?
Comments:
7.4.3. Do the process control plans (production and pre-launch) agree with the actual process?
Do production part checks and statistical monitoring take place as outlined on the process
control plan?
Comments:
7.4.4. Are potential failure modes, as identified in the PFMEA, addressed through error proofing
or the control plan?
Comments:
Comments:
Do the parts produced off production tooling during the Run @ Rate meet SRG Global's
requirements for on-going quality?
Is there a plan in place to track, analyze, and improve First Time Quality?
7.6.1. Were subcontractors' abilities to meet defined quality and capacity requirements confirmed
by the supplier prior to the Run @ Rate? Was verification of the subcontractors'
manufacturing processes accomplished through a Run @ Rate or similar process condu
Comments:
7.6.2. Are controls in place to isolate incoming material until it has been approved?
Comments:
7.7.1. Do the in process and final shipment packaging preserve part quality and provide for easy
loading and unloading of parts?
Comments:
7.7.2. Does the supplier's method for in process and final shipping packaging and handling
effectively eliminate the potential for process errors or mixed stock?
Comments:
7.7.4. Does the supplier's labeling system ensure that no misidentification will occur?
Comments:
7.7.5. Is bar code labeling a requirement unless specifically instructed otherwise by purchasing?
Comments:
Additional COMMENTS:
Completed
By:
Phone: Date:
All of the preceeding requirements must be met to pass the Run @ Rate.
Pass
- The manufacturing process agrees with the manufacturing & quality plan as documented in PPAP.
Open
- Minor nonconformity(s) exist but will not likely result in the shipment of nonconforming material.
Available YES/NO
YES/NO
YES/NO
YES/NO
YES/NO
material.
CAPACITY PIECES PER HOUR UPTIME (TRS) FTQ (first time Gross DAILY CAPACITY CALCULATIONS Observation
quality) Hours Planned Planned Actual Worst Excess Period
QTC MSV Mach. Cycle / Hr. Pieces # Total Hrs. Machine Capacity1 Equivalent2 Case or Net Good
Operation (per day) (per day) Planned Actual / Cycle Planned Actual Planned Actual Sh Day Useage (EGHJMN) (FGIKMN) Equivalent3 Shortage4 Time Pieces
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
A B C D E F G H5 I5 J5 K5 L M N5 O P Q R S T
5.) Percentages: All percentages (H,I,J,K,N) are input as they should appear (I.e.: 94.7% should be input as 94.7); NOT as a decimal (e.g.: 0.947).
Completed
Packaging/ Shipping Label Submission Checklist Yes No N/A
1 Packaging has been tested and verified and where required, approved by
the customer. (approval enclosed from purchasing and manufacturing site)
Comments:
2 Packaging designs, drawings, and data are included in the PPAP
Comments:
3 An expendable or temporary package has been tested and approved by the
customer as a contingency measure. Details for that package are also
enclosed in this PPAP.
Comments:
4 A sample of the shipping label is enclosed and has been accepted by the
customer based on scanning and test reading the label.
(New Suppliers Only)
Comments:
N/A 0
Date NO - REJECTED 0
Reviewed S
Reviewed by S COMPLETED 0
I
M
A
G
E
S
Packaging Cost
C Price
O Primary Packaging
S Secondary Packaging
T Package $ Price / Part
Freight Informatio
F Street City
R Shiping Location
E Shipping Hours Mileage from shipping location
I
G Combining Loads List all part numbers being ship
H Shipment(s) / week Returnable or Expendable
T Parts/ Shipment Transportation Mode
Cost per shipment Freight cost per part
Comments :
Supplier Signature:
Customer Approval
kaging and Freight Form
Contact Information
Packaging Contact:
Phone Number:
Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
Part Information
Part Description
Part Weight (Lbs)
Part Dimensions LXWXH (mm)
Part Number(s)
Replaces part number
Information
ary Packaging ( Container ) Secondary Packaging(Unit Shipping Load)
Freight Information
City State Zip Code
Date: Comments:
Date: Comments:
PPAP Submission Checklist Tab 24
Completed
Sub Supplier PPAP Submission Checklist Yes No N/A
N/A 0
Date NO - REJECTED 0
Reviewed S
Reviewed by S COMPLETED 0
Completed
Tooling information and identification Checklist Yes No N/A
All Tooling information must be returned including the signed Bailee form in order for PPAP
approval to be given.
N/A 0
NO - REJECTED 0
Date Reviewed S
Reviewed by S COMPLETED 0
Customer # Supplier :
Program : Contact :
Date : Phone :
Part Description :
Material Specification :
Material currently been used :
I Press:
1 Original tool manufacturer
3 Type of press(rotary/flatbed)
II Tooling information
4 Gear ratio
6 Shaft diameter
V Additional Information
1 Identification Plate ( Property Of :)
Part number:
Eng. Level:
2 Tool Drawing :
3 Secondary Tooling:
4 Others :
History of maintenance that has been done on the tool in the past 12 Months :
Quality History :
Customer # Supplier :
Contact :
Phone :
Date : Email :
Part Description :
Programs
1 Tool Size : L X W X H
3 Number of Cavities :
4 Mould Type :
5 Runner System :
6 Gating Style :
9 Type of Mechanisms :
11 Cycle Time :
12 Part Weight :
13 Tooling Cost :
15 Tool Condition:
16 Set-up Sheet :
Part number:
Eng. Level:
18 Tool Drawing :
19 Secondary Tooling:
20 Others :
Quality History :
TYPE:
MIN - MAX x WIDTH x PITCH
SIZE: _____________________________________
OPERATION # DESCRIPTION OF OPERATION TOOL NUMBER TOOLING SIZE MACHINE REQUIREMENTS PCS PER HOUR PRESS / HOURS
INSPECTION:
This form must be fully completed and signed by the supplier representative before PPAP ap
granted. Form is embedded as a file in the next tab labeled "tab 26 Form."
Date
Reviewed S
Reviewed by S
Tab 26
SAMPLE FORM
COMPLETION GUIDELINES Part Number Headers are linked to chec
Description same
Completed
Yes No N/A Supplier Contact Sheet a
N/A 0
NO - REJECTED 0 Date
Reviewed
COMPLETED 0 Reviewed by
PPAP Submission Checklist Tab 26
Completed
Supplier Contact Sheet and Manufacturing/Shipping Location Declaration Yes No N/A
rmForm
d. must is
beembedded
fully completed and
as a file in signed bytab
the next thelabeled
supplier representative
"tab 26 before PPAP approval is
N/A 0
NO - REJECTED 0
S
S COMPLETED 0
pproval is
Supplier Contact List and Manufacturing Location Declaration
Supplier Name
DUNS Number
Mailing Address
Manufacturing Address
Primary
Secondary
Scheduling
Primary
Secondary
Shipping
Primary
Secondary
Quality
Primary
Secondary
Engineering
Primary
Secondary
After Hours
Primary
Secondary
Management
Primary
Secondary
I certify that the above listed manufacturing location and shipping location is in accordance with the quote submitted to SRG Global Purchasing.