Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
R. H. R. TIDE
XVeinforcing structural steel compression members to ally increased above a comparable column reinforced with-
increase the cross-sectional area or decrease slenderness by out load because of the beneficial effects of improved residual
attaching additional bars, plates, angles and channels is an stress distribution.
economical method of increasing load-carrying capacity. Recently published papers by Ricker, Brown^ and Tall^
Supplemental reinforcement has been installed under vari- have addressed the issue of reinforcing compression mem-
ous loading conditions. In most cases the attachment is bers (columns) under loaded conditions. It appears that to
achieved by welding, although bolting niay be chosen for some degree these authors have ignored the earlier lessons
some particular technical or administrative reason. The reported in 1944 by Spraragen and reproduced herewith:
author has been involved in both methods, and usually expe-
"It is regrettable that many of the investigators taking
rience and the specific conditions dictate which attachment
stress measurements did not fully understand the phe-
method is more appropriate. This paper presents a review
nomena involved. For example, elastic stress and plas-
of several proposed reinforcement methods and discusses
tic flow (distortions) are sometimes contused. Moreover
factors that must be considered for each. The focus of this
some investigators have been partially deceived by
paper is welded reinforcement methods, although an
adjustment under load where peak residuals through ini-
appropriate reference to a bolted study is made.
tial yielding of the material (plastic flow) have been
Whenever the existing steel members are in good condi-
ironed out and thereafter the structure behaves on the
tion and their composition is known, the welding require-
basis of calculated strength."
ments are straightforward. However, for older unknown or
corroded steel, other factors are involved, such as weldabil- For the most part Tall recognized that the complex distri-
ity, contaminants and deep pitting. These issues were bution of residual stresses across the column cross-section
addressed by Tide^ and Ricker^ in earlier papers and are not is the key parameter affecting column strengthening under
repeated herein. load. After appropriately developing his position. Tall con-
A few case-study papers by Spraragen,^ O'SuUivan"^ and cluded that for columns carrying design loads, their rein-
Donovan^ are available to highlight successful procedures forcement under load is possible and safe—provided the
that have been used in the past. Many of the issues identi- loads and the design are checked to ensure that code require-
fied by Spraragen are as applicable today as when he first ments are met. Unfortunately, it was not clear as to what
enumerated them in 1944. However, since 1944 our knowl- he meant. If this differentiates between the stress levels in
edge of welding, welding procedures, fatigue and residual the original and the reinforcing member, the author disagrees.
stress has greatly increased and the severity of some of the However, if he is referring to an average stress value, then
effects that concerned him have been mitigated. O'Sullivan the author concurs with this recommendation. It should be
tested trusses that had been reinforced (bolted) with and with- emphasized that the stipulation "columns carrying design
out applied load and determined that there was no substan- loads'' implies that at the time of strengthening a safety fac-
tial difference in the ultimate strength between the two pro- tor in excess of 1.67 exists. For long compression members
cedures. However, when the trusses were reinforced under the safety factor is at least 1.92. Whenever less than maxi-
load, he determined that there was a 50 percent increase in mum live load conditions are encountered, the safety is even
deflection before full cross-sectional yielding occurred. It larger.
should be noted that when bolted reinforcement is consid- Unfortunately Tall devoted excessive discussion to the ben-
ered there will be a reduction in the net section of the origi- efits of rearranging the residual stress distribution pattern.
nal cross-section resulting from the new bolt holes. Actually Hall^ has shown that the residual stress distribu-
Single column laboratory tests have been reported by tion in steel shapes is probably non-symmetrical, and Tide^^
Nagaraja Rao^ and one of the reported conclusions was that has presented figures showing that the specification design
the ultimate strength of a column reinforced under load actu- equations essentially represent a lower bound capacity as
compared to test results. There have been ample tests con-
ducted to verify (ASCE,^' Galambos^^ and Tide^^) that
R. H. R. Tide is senior consultant with Wiss, Janney, Elstner fabrication (welding) effects do not alter the performance
Associates, Inc. in Northbrook, Illinois and a member of AISC's
of steel members below the values predicted by AISC's^"^'^^
Committee on Specifications.
Specification. In general, placing a weld bead along the