Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Facts:
• Our analysis shows that a segregated allocation of (70% Equity + 30% Debt) to
funds consistently outperforms investing in Balanced funds.
• For every INR 10 lacs invested for 5 years, this on average translated to an
opportunity loss of ₹2.35 lacs or 23.5% of the original invested amount.
1. In a Balanced fund, usually there is a single fund manager for the Equity &
Debt portion of the portfolio, which might not be the ideal scenario for your
portfolio. It is always better to keep your Equity & Debt investments separate,
so that you can choose the best fund manager for each asset class & get the
best of both worlds.
2. Below is a comparison of the performance given by Balanced funds, with
respect to their Equity & Debt counterparts from the same Asset Management
Company (AMC):
22.00
18.00
14.00
10.00
Oct-15
Nov-15
Dec-15
Jan-16
May-16
Oct-16
Nov-16
Dec-16
Jan-17
May-17
Aug-15
Sep-15
Feb-16
Mar-16
Apr-16
Jun-16
Jul-16
Aug-16
Sep-16
Feb-17
Mar-17
Apr-17
Jun-17
The graph below depicts the wealth differential1 between investing INR 10 lacs in
Balanced funds v/s investing the same individually in a (70:30) Equity + Debt
combination:
20.00
15.00
10.00 10.00
10.00
5.00
0.00
1 2
As seen above, for every INR 10 lacs the investor would have invested in a Balanced
fund, they would have incurred an opportunity loss of INR 2.35 lacs or 23% of the
original invested amount, as against a diversified Equity + Debt (70:30) combination
over a period of 5 years.
Thus, this effectively demonstrates that asset allocation should be decided at the
balance sheet level and not at the Scheme level.
1 Based on historic returns