Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Grade 12
l
Teach Intro to the Philo. Of the Human
RAQUEL T. LUGTU Subject
er Person
Seme 1st Grading
QUARTER – First, week 1
ster Period
DATE: June 4, 2018 June 5, 2018 June 6, 2018 June 7, 2018 June 8, 2018
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday
I. OBJECTIVE
A . Content • The learner... understands the meaning and process of doing philosophy
Standards
B . Performance • The learner… reflects on a concrete experience in a philosophical way
Standards
C. Learning • Distinguish a holistic Distinguish a holistic perspective Distinguish a holistic
Distinguish a holistic
Competencies/ perspective from a Distinguish a holistic perspective from a partial point of view perspective from a partial point
perspective from a
Objectives Write partial point of view from a partial point of view (PPT11/12-Ia-1.1) of view (PPT11/12-Ia-1.1)
partial point of view
the LC code for (PPT11/12-Ia-1.1) (PPT11/12-Ia-1.1)
(PPT11/12-Ia-1.1)
each
II. CONTENT Doing Philosophy
A. References
Pencil/Eraser
How did Padre R. Ferriols
present philosophy? Broom Stick
Shoes
Modern: to
reason/rationalize
Post-Modern: to find
meaning
E. Discussing new Unlocking of Difficulties: Unlocking of Difficulties:
concepts and
practicing new skills Meaning of Philosophy as a path Philosophy as a process
#2 towards the attainment of wisdom.
Philosophy is employed as a
method of inquiry. It is an
engagement in the search for
the meaning of life, its value
and relevance. It is a process for
finding significance in
existence.
G. Finding practical Flash the statements: Give the analogy of riding a Why do we need to
application of bicycle. Riding a bicycle is not respect the view of
concepts and skills in “The unexamined life is not worth about knowing its parts but it is other people?
daily living living” and “He who has a way to in riding the bicycle itself.
live for can bear with almost any
how”.
I. Evaluating .
learning
J. Additional
activities for
application or
remediation
V. REMARKS
VI. REFLECTION
A. No. of Learners
who earned 80% in
the evaluation
B. No. of Learners
who require
additional activities
for remediation who
scored below 80%
C. Did the remedial
lessons work? No. of
Learners who have
caught up with the
lessons
D, No. of Learners
who continue to
require remediation
E. Which of my
teaching strategies
worked well? Why
did these work?
F. What difficulties
did I encountered
which my principal
or supervisor can
help me solve?
G. What innovation
or localized materials
did I use/discover
which I wish to share
with other teachers?
Prepared by: RAQUEL T. LUGTU Checked by: EDITHA P. BAUTISTA, HT I Noted by:
DELIA F. DIZON
PHILO Teacher SHS Focal Person Principal III