Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
net/publication/224756031
CITATIONS READS
8 139
4 authors, including:
Hokyoung Ryu
Hanyang University
114 PUBLICATIONS 1,278 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Don Quixote: Serious game analytics to assess decision-making biases View project
All content following this page was uploaded by B. Fong on 11 July 2014.
IV. CONCLUSION
The effects of rain attenuation on a local multipoint distribu-
tion service system operating at 26 GHz have been studied with
alternately polarized carriers. Results show that the difference
in signal attenuation between horizontal and vertical polariza-
tion becomes more significant as the rate of rainfall increases.
As much as 3-dB attenuation difference and 45 phase differ-
ence exist between the two polarizations when the rate of rain-
fall approaches 90 mm/h. The results offer some guidelines in
estimation of necessary system fade margins that are greatly af-
fected by the rain statistics and modulation scheme used [8].
Increase in gain margin of both the system and antennas can
improve link availability to compensate for the reduction in cov-
erage caused by rainfall. It is apparent from the results that the
Fig. 2. Attenuation difference between horizontal and vertical polarization.
presence of rain has a significant impact on both polarizations
at 26 GHz. The results presented in this letter may be used as
where is the path length and is the effective propagation
system deployment guidelines to evaluate necessary fade mar-
constant as
gins for 26-GHz fixed BWA systems.
(3)
REFERENCES
where is the propagation constant for free space and is [1] R. O. LaMaire, A. Krishna, P. Bhagwat, and J. Panian, “Wireless
a function of the raindrop size distribution. LAN’s and mobile networking: Standards and future directions,” IEEE
Commun. Mag., vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 86–94, Aug. 1996.
A scattered plot of attenuation for both polarizations is shown [2] H. Xu, T. S. Rappaport, R. J. Boyle, and J. H. Schaffner, “38-GHz wide-
in Fig. 1 with the best-fit lines representing attenuation per kilo- band point-to-multipoint measurements under different weather condi-
meter range for the both horizontal and vertical polarizations tions,” IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 7–8, Jan. 2000.
[3] V. Tralli, A. Verdone, and O. Andrisano, “Adaptive time and frequency
with most of the readings recorded found lying within 1 dB of resource assignment with COFDM for LMDS systems,” IEEE Trans.
the best-fit plots. The attenuation difference between horizontal Commun, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 235–238, Feb. 2001.
and vertical polarization that results from Fig. 1 is plotted in [4] B. Fong, N. Ansari, A. C. M. Fong, G. Y. Hong, and P. B. Rapajic, “On
Fig. 2. A fairly linear increase in attenuation difference is ob- the scalability of fixed broadband wireless access network deployment,”
IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 12–18, Sep. 2004.
served as the rate of rainfall increases. A 3 dB difference is [5] B. Fong, P. B. Rapajic, G. Y. Hong, and A. C. M. Fong, “The Effect
found when the rain rate approaches 90 mm/h and almost 6 dB of rain attenuation on orthogonally polarized LMDS systems in tropical
at 150 mm/h when the horizontally polarized signal can suffer rain regions,” IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett, vol. 2, no. 1, pp.
66–67, Dec. 2003.
from a 25-dB attenuation in 1 km. The phase rotation is derived [6] T. Oguchi, “Attenuation and phase rotation due to rain: Calculations at
using the method described in [6]. Fig. 3 shows the phase dif- 19.3 and 34.8 GHz,” Radio Sci., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 833–839, Feb. 1972.
ference between the two polarizations. A 45 difference occurs [7] Propagation Data and Prediction Methods Required for the Design of
when the rain rate is approximately 90 mm/h. The attenuation Terrestrial Line-of-Sight Systems, ITU-R P.530–7, 1997.
[8] B. Fong, P. B. Rapajic, A. C. M. Fong, and G. Y. Hong, “Polarization
measurements have been compared with the ITU-R statistics [7] of received signals for wideband wireless communications in a heavy
and most of the readings are found within a -dB range. rainfall region,” IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 13–14, Jan. 2003.