Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Number
Type of the
Individual ☐ Collaborative ☒ of 2
activity:
weeks
Moment of Unit
Initial ☐ ☒ Final ☐
evaluation Intermediate:
Delivery Environment of the
Evaluative score of the activity: Collaborative Learning
activity: 125 and Monitoring and Evaluation
Environment
Starting date of the activity: Deadline of the activity:
10/05/2019 23/05/2019
Competence to develop:
The student is capable of developing a negotiation of technologic assets
from products, processes, and systems innovation, with the aim of
achieving the organization social and business goals.
Topics to develop:
Unit 1, 2, 3
Steps, phases of the learning strategy to develop
Collaborative:
4. After the database consolidation and the graphs design, the group
writes an analysis of at least 80 words, for each question describing
its trends in relation to the problem of study:
How to promote digital transformation in Colombian medium-sized
enterprises?
Cover
Introduction
Objectives
Problem description (Step 1)
Research Justification Chart (Step 2)
Research Methodology Chart (Step 3)
Data analysis graphs (Step 5 - Activities 3 and 4)
Problem solution proposals YouTube links (Step 5 – Activity 5)
Conclusions (Step 5 – Activity 6)
References (Use APA guidelines)
Environment
Collaborative Learning, Monitoring and Evaluation
for the
Environment
development
Collaborative:
Roles to
● Compiler
perform by
● Reviewer
the student
● Evaluator
in the
● Deliveries
collaborative
● Alerts
group
Roles and Compiler: Consolidate the document constituted as
responsibilit the final product of the debate, taking into account that
y for the the contributions of all the participants have been
delivery of included and that only the participants who participated
products by in the process are included.
students
Reviewer: Ensure that the writing complies with the
rules of presentation of work required by the teacher.
http://centrodeescritura.javerianacali.edu.co/index.ph
p?option=com_content&view=article&id=138:normas-
apa&catid=45:referencias-bibliograficas&Itemid=
Plagiarism
policy In the agreement 029 of December 13, 2013, article
99, the mistakes that infringe upon the academic
order, among others, are the following: paragraph e)
“To plagiarize is to present as your own work the
whole or part of a writing, report, task or document of
invention performed by another person. It also implies
the use of cites or lack of references, or includes cites
where there is no coincidence between them and the
reference” and paragraph f)”To reproduce, or copy for
profit, educational resources or results of research
products, which have intellectual rights reserved for
the University”.
9. Evaluation rubric
Evaluation rubric
Collaborat
Activity type: Individual Activity ☐ ive ☒
Activity
Moment of Unit
the Initial ☐ Intermedi ☐ Final ☒
evaluation ate:
Assessed Performance levels of the collaborative Asse
Aspect activity ssed
Aspe
High score Media score Low score
ct
The student
consolidates
The student
and analyzes
consolidates the
the information
information
but the results
gathered from
do not include a
real companies, The
graph or the
Consolidate builds graph for analysis does
student
and analyze each of the 5 does not
not evidence
data to questions and contribute
the 40
identify analyzes it to to the data
understanding
business identify trends in analysis
of medium-
trends medium-sized
sized
enterprises for
enterprises
digital
trends for
transformation
digital
transformation
(up to 40 (up to 20 (up to 0
points) points) points)
The student
submits a 1
The student minute video,
submits a 1 including its
minute video, name and date, The
Propose including its explaining its student
solutions to name and date, proposal to does not
explaining its solve the submit any
problem in a
proposal to solve problem of video 40
real context
the problem of study, but its proposing a
study, evidencing arguments are solution to
arguments from not clear and the
the contents related to the problem
studied along the studied
course contents, or it
does not follow
all guidelines
(up to 40 (up to 20 (up to 0
points) points) points)
The
student
does not
The student
submit any
writes in its own The student
conclusion
words, one submits a
explaining
paragraph 100 to conclusion in its
Understandin the
200 words, own words but
g of valuation importance
explaining the it does not
and for
importance for evidence a
negotiation industrial
industrial proper
of technology engineers
engineers of understanding 15
as a key tool of being
being capable to of the contents
to lead capable to
develop a developed along
develop a
companies successful the course in
successful
valuation and relation to its
valuation
negotiation of profession
and
technology
negotiation
of
technology
(up to 15 (up to 8 (up to 0
points) points) points)
The student
The
submits to the
student
Monitoring and
The student does not
Evaluation
submits the PDF submit the
Environment a
document to PDF
PDF document,
the Monitoring document
evidencing
Strength wri and Evaluation to the
proper grammar
tten commun Environment, Monitoring 30
and spelling,
ication skills but, it is not and
following all
complete, or it Evaluation
given guidelines
is missing some Environme
consolidating a
of the given nt,
complete
guidelines describing
research inform,
including
including also
the
problem
description, research
justification, inform
methodology,
data analysis,
solution
proposal,
conclusions and
references
(Up to 30 (Up to 15 (Up to 0
points) points) points)
Final score 125