Sie sind auf Seite 1von 24

The University of Sydney

Simulation of
Space_Frame_2019
Date: Friday, 17 May 2019
Designer: L.Nunez
Study name: Torque 1
Analysis type: Static

Table of Contents
Description ........................................... 1
Assumptions .......................................... 2
Model Information .................................. 3
Study Properties .................................... 10
Units .................................................. 10
Material Properties ................................ 11
Description Loads and Fixtures ................................. 13
No Data Connector Definitions ............................. 13
Contact Information ............................... 13
Mesh information ................................... 14
Sensor Details ....................................... 14
Resultant Forces .................................... 15
Beams ................................................ 16
Study Results ........................................ 22
Conclusion ........................................... 24

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of Space_Frame_2019 1


The University of Sydney L.Nunez
17/05/2019

Assumptions

Original Model Model Analyzed

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of Space_Frame_2019 2


The University of Sydney L.Nunez
17/05/2019

Model Information

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of Space_Frame_2019 3


The University of Sydney L.Nunez
17/05/2019

Model name: Space_Frame_2019


Current Configuration: Default<As Machined>
Beam Bodies:
Document Name and Document Path/Date
Formulation Properties
Reference Modified
Section Standard-
Beam-1(Pipe 25.4 x iso/pipe/25.4 x 1.6
1.6(11)[20]) Section Area:
0.000119632m^2 E:\Capstone\Space_Frame
Length:1049.83mm \Space_Frame_2019.SLDP
Beam – Uniform C/S
Volume:0.00011878m^3 RT
Mass Density:7850kg/m^3 May 17 11:20:16 2019
Mass:0.932426kg
Weight:9.13778N

Section Standard-
Beam-3(Pipe 25.4 x iso/pipe/25.4 x 1.6
1.6(11)[13]) Section Area:
0.000119632m^2 E:\Capstone\Space_Frame
Length:955.103mm \Space_Frame_2019.SLDP
Beam – Uniform C/S
Volume:0.000106025m^3 RT
Mass Density:7850kg/m^3 May 17 11:20:16 2019
Mass:0.832297kg
Weight:8.15651N

E:\Capstone\Space_Frame
Section Standard-
Beam-4(Bulk Boss[3]) Beam – Uniform C/S \Space_Frame_2019.SLDP
iso/pipe/25.4 x 1.6
RT

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of Space_Frame_2019 4


The University of Sydney L.Nunez
17/05/2019

Section Area: May 17 11:20:16 2019


0.000506707m^2
Length:60mm
Volume:3.04024e-05m^3
Mass Density:7850kg/m^3
Mass:0.238659kg
Weight:2.33886N

Section Standard-
Beam-5(Pipe 25.4 x iso/pipe/25.4 x 1.6
1.6(11)[14]) Section Area:
0.000119632m^2 E:\Capstone\Space_Frame
Length:418.876mm \Space_Frame_2019.SLDP
Beam – Uniform C/S
Volume:4.32058e-05m^3 RT
Mass Density:7850kg/m^3 May 17 11:20:16 2019
Mass:0.339166kg
Weight:3.32382N

Section Standard-
Beam-6(Pipe 25.4 x iso/pipe/25.4 x 1.6
1.6(11)[2]) Section Area:
0.000119632m^2 E:\Capstone\Space_Frame
Length:599.449mm \Space_Frame_2019.SLDP
Beam – Uniform C/S
Volume:7.13803e-05m^3 RT
Mass Density:7850kg/m^3 May 17 11:20:16 2019
Mass:0.560335kg
Weight:5.49128N

Section Standard-
Beam-7(Pipe 25.4 x iso/pipe/25.4 x 1.6
1.6(11)[21]) Section Area:
0.000119632m^2 E:\Capstone\Space_Frame
Length:1087.07mm \Space_Frame_2019.SLDP
Beam – Uniform C/S
Volume:0.00012168m^3 RT
Mass Density:7850kg/m^3 May 17 11:20:16 2019
Mass:0.955185kg
Weight:9.36081N

Section Standard-
Beam-8(Pipe 25.4 x iso/pipe/25.4 x 1.6
1.6(11)[18]) Section Area:
0.000119632m^2 E:\Capstone\Space_Frame
Length:468.718mm \Space_Frame_2019.SLDP
Beam – Uniform C/S
Volume:5.24864e-05m^3 RT
Mass Density:7850kg/m^3 May 17 11:20:16 2019
Mass:0.412019kg
Weight:4.03778N

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of Space_Frame_2019 5


The University of Sydney L.Nunez
17/05/2019

Section Standard-
Beam-9(Pipe 25.4 x iso/pipe/25.4 x 1.6
1.6(11)[1]) Section Area:
0.000119632m^2 E:\Capstone\Space_Frame
Length:213.153mm \Space_Frame_2019.SLDP
Beam – Uniform C/S
Volume:2.43406e-05m^3 RT
Mass Density:7850kg/m^3 May 17 11:20:16 2019
Mass:0.191074kg
Weight:1.87252N

Section Standard-
Beam-10(Pipe 25.4 x iso/pipe/25.4 x 1.6
1.6(11)[17]) Section Area:
0.000119632m^2 E:\Capstone\Space_Frame
Length:520.493mm \Space_Frame_2019.SLDP
Beam – Uniform C/S
Volume:6.05624e-05m^3 RT
Mass Density:7850kg/m^3 May 17 11:20:16 2019
Mass:0.475415kg
Weight:4.65907N

Section Standard-
Beam-11(Pipe 25.4 x iso/pipe/25.4 x 1.6
1.6(11)[11]) Section Area:
0.000119632m^2 E:\Capstone\Space_Frame
Length:2261.36mm \Space_Frame_2019.SLDP
Beam – Uniform C/S
Volume:0.000270546m^3 RT
Mass Density:7850kg/m^3 May 17 11:20:16 2019
Mass:2.12379kg
Weight:20.8131N

Section Standard-
Beam-12(Pipe 25.4 x iso/pipe/25.4 x 1.6
1.6(11)[6]) Section Area:
0.000119632m^2 E:\Capstone\Space_Frame
Length:511.07mm \Space_Frame_2019.SLDP
Beam – Uniform C/S
Volume:5.57852e-05m^3 RT
Mass Density:7850kg/m^3 May 17 11:20:16 2019
Mass:0.437914kg
Weight:4.29156N

Section Standard-
Beam-13(Pipe 25.4 x iso/pipe/25.4 x 1.6
1.6(11)[3]) Section Area:
0.000119632m^2 E:\Capstone\Space_Frame
Length:185.416mm \Space_Frame_2019.SLDP
Beam – Uniform C/S
Volume:1.96934e-05m^3 RT
Mass Density:7850kg/m^3 May 17 11:20:16 2019
Mass:0.154593kg
Weight:1.51501N

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of Space_Frame_2019 6


The University of Sydney L.Nunez
17/05/2019

Section Standard-
Beam-14(Pipe 25.4 x iso/pipe/25.4 x 1.6
1.6(11)[10]) Section Area:
0.000119632m^2 E:\Capstone\Space_Frame
Length:289.262mm \Space_Frame_2019.SLDP
Beam – Uniform C/S
Volume:3.24397e-05m^3 RT
Mass Density:7850kg/m^3 May 17 11:20:16 2019
Mass:0.254652kg
Weight:2.49559N

Section Standard-
Beam-15(Pipe 25.4 x iso/pipe/25.4 x 1.6
1.6(11)[16]) Section Area:
0.000119632m^2 E:\Capstone\Space_Frame
Length:501.303mm \Space_Frame_2019.SLDP
Beam – Uniform C/S
Volume:0.000180027m^3 RT
Mass Density:7850kg/m^3 May 17 11:20:16 2019
Mass:1.41321kg
Weight:13.8494N

Section Standard-
Beam-16(Pipe 25.4 x iso/pipe/25.4 x 1.6
1.6(11)[4]) Section Area:
0.000119632m^2 E:\Capstone\Space_Frame
Length:119.936mm \Space_Frame_2019.SLDP
Beam – Uniform C/S
Volume:1.2358e-05m^3 RT
Mass Density:7850kg/m^3 May 17 11:20:16 2019
Mass:0.0970104kg
Weight:0.950702N

Section Standard-
Beam-17(Pipe 25.4 x iso/pipe/25.4 x 1.6
1.6(11)[8]) Section Area:
0.000119632m^2 E:\Capstone\Space_Frame
Length:213.693mm \Space_Frame_2019.SLDP
Beam – Uniform C/S
Volume:2.43399e-05m^3 RT
Mass Density:7850kg/m^3 May 17 11:20:16 2019
Mass:0.191068kg
Weight:1.87247N

Section Standard-
Beam-18(Pipe 25.4 x iso/pipe/25.4 x 1.6
1.6(11)[5]) Section Area:
0.000119632m^2 E:\Capstone\Space_Frame
Length:509.851mm \Space_Frame_2019.SLDP
Beam – Uniform C/S
Volume:5.60592e-05m^3 RT
Mass Density:7850kg/m^3 May 17 11:20:16 2019
Mass:0.440064kg
Weight:4.31263N

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of Space_Frame_2019 7


The University of Sydney L.Nunez
17/05/2019

Section Standard-
Beam-19(Pipe 25.4 x iso/pipe/25.4 x 1.6
1.6(11)[12]) Section Area:
0.000119632m^2 E:\Capstone\Space_Frame
Length:940.202mm \Space_Frame_2019.SLDP
Beam – Uniform C/S
Volume:0.00010286m^3 RT
Mass Density:7850kg/m^3 May 17 11:20:16 2019
Mass:0.807449kg
Weight:7.913N

Section Standard-
Beam-20(Bulk Boss[4]) iso/pipe/25.4 x 1.6
Section Area:
0.000506707m^2 E:\Capstone\Space_Frame
Length:60mm \Space_Frame_2019.SLDP
Beam – Uniform C/S
Volume:3.04024e-05m^3 RT
Mass Density:7850kg/m^3 May 17 11:20:16 2019
Mass:0.238659kg
Weight:2.33886N

Section Standard-
Beam-21(Engine Boss[3]) iso/pipe/25.4 x 1.6
Section Area:
0.000891969m^2 E:\Capstone\Space_Frame
Length:100mm \Space_Frame_2019.SLDP
Beam – Uniform C/S
Volume:8.91969e-05m^3 RT
Mass Density:7850kg/m^3 May 17 11:20:16 2019
Mass:0.700196kg
Weight:6.86192N

Section Standard-
Beam-22(Engine Boss[2]) iso/pipe/25.4 x 1.6
Section Area:
0.000891969m^2 E:\Capstone\Space_Frame
Length:100mm \Space_Frame_2019.SLDP
Beam – Uniform C/S
Volume:8.91969e-05m^3 RT
Mass Density:7850kg/m^3 May 17 11:20:16 2019
Mass:0.700196kg
Weight:6.86192N

Section Standard-
Beam-23(Engine Boss[1]) iso/pipe/25.4 x 1.6
Section Area:
0.000891969m^2 E:\Capstone\Space_Frame
Length:100mm \Space_Frame_2019.SLDP
Beam – Uniform C/S
Volume:8.91969e-05m^3 RT
Mass Density:7850kg/m^3 May 17 11:20:16 2019
Mass:0.700196kg
Weight:6.86192N

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of Space_Frame_2019 8


The University of Sydney L.Nunez
17/05/2019

Section Standard-
Beam-24(Pipe 25.4 x iso/pipe/25.4 x 1.6
1.6(11)[9]) Section Area:
0.000119632m^2 E:\Capstone\Space_Frame
Length:310.318mm \Space_Frame_2019.SLDP
Beam – Uniform C/S
Volume:3.46499e-05m^3 RT
Mass Density:7850kg/m^3 May 17 11:20:16 2019
Mass:0.272002kg
Weight:2.66562N

Section Standard-
Beam-25(Engine Boss[4]) iso/pipe/25.4 x 1.6
Section Area:
0.000891969m^2 E:\Capstone\Space_Frame
Length:100mm \Space_Frame_2019.SLDP
Beam – Uniform C/S
Volume:8.91969e-05m^3 RT
Mass Density:7850kg/m^3 May 17 11:20:16 2019
Mass:0.700196kg
Weight:6.86192N

Section Standard-
Beam-26(Pipe 25.4 x iso/pipe/25.4 x 1.6
1.6(11)[15]) Section Area:
0.000119632m^2 E:\Capstone\Space_Frame
Length:400.127mm \Space_Frame_2019.SLDP
Beam – Uniform C/S
Volume:4.1236e-05m^3 RT
Mass Density:7850kg/m^3 May 17 11:20:16 2019
Mass:0.323703kg
Weight:3.17229N

Section Standard-
Beam-27(Pipe 25.4 x iso/pipe/25.4 x 1.6
1.6(11)[7]) Section Area:
0.000119632m^2 E:\Capstone\Space_Frame
Length:235.583mm \Space_Frame_2019.SLDP
Beam – Uniform C/S
Volume:2.63349e-05m^3 RT
Mass Density:7850kg/m^3 May 17 11:20:16 2019
Mass:0.206729kg
Weight:2.02595N

Section Standard-
Beam-28(Pipe 25.4 x iso/pipe/25.4 x 1.6
1.6(11)[19]) Section Area:
0.000119632m^2 E:\Capstone\Space_Frame
Length:519.572mm \Space_Frame_2019.SLDP
Beam – Uniform C/S
Volume:5.78256e-05m^3 RT
Mass Density:7850kg/m^3 May 17 11:20:16 2019
Mass:0.453931kg
Weight:4.44853N

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of Space_Frame_2019 9


The University of Sydney L.Nunez
17/05/2019

Study Properties
Study name Torque 1
Analysis type Static
Mesh type Beam Mesh
Solver type Direct sparse solver
Inplane Effect: Off
Soft Spring: Off
Inertial Relief: Off
Incompatible bonding options Automatic
Large displacement Off
Compute free body forces On
Result folder SOLIDWORKS document
(E:\Capstone\Space_Frame)

Units
Unit system: SI (MKS)
Length/Displacement mm
Temperature Kelvin
Angular velocity Rad/sec
Pressure/Stress N/m^2

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of Space_Frame_2019 10


The University of Sydney L.Nunez
17/05/2019

Material Properties
Model Reference Properties Components
Name: ASTM A36 Steel SolidBody 1(Pipe 25.4 x
Model type: Linear Elastic Isotropic 1.6(11)[20])(Space_Frame_20
Default failure Max von Mises Stress 19),
criterion: SolidBody 3(Pipe 25.4 x
Yield strength: 2.5e+08 N/m^2 1.6(11)[13])(Space_Frame_20
Tensile strength: 4e+08 N/m^2 19),
Elastic modulus: 2e+11 N/m^2 SolidBody 4(Bulk
Poisson's ratio: 0.26 Boss[3])(Space_Frame_2019),
Mass density: 7850 kg/m^3 SolidBody 5(Pipe 25.4 x
Shear modulus: 7.93e+10 N/m^2 1.6(11)[14])(Space_Frame_20
19),
SolidBody 6(Pipe 25.4 x
1.6(11)[2])(Space_Frame_201
9),
SolidBody 7(Pipe 25.4 x
1.6(11)[21])(Space_Frame_20
19),
SolidBody 8(Pipe 25.4 x
1.6(11)[18])(Space_Frame_20
19),
SolidBody 9(Pipe 25.4 x
1.6(11)[1])(Space_Frame_201
9),
SolidBody 10(Pipe 25.4 x
1.6(11)[17])(Space_Frame_20
19),
SolidBody 11(Pipe 25.4 x
1.6(11)[11])(Space_Frame_20
19),
SolidBody 12(Pipe 25.4 x
1.6(11)[6])(Space_Frame_201
9),
SolidBody 13(Pipe 25.4 x
1.6(11)[3])(Space_Frame_201
9),
SolidBody 14(Pipe 25.4 x
1.6(11)[10])(Space_Frame_20
19),
SolidBody 15(Pipe 25.4 x
1.6(11)[16])(Space_Frame_20
19),
SolidBody 16(Pipe 25.4 x
1.6(11)[4])(Space_Frame_201
9),

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of Space_Frame_2019 11


The University of Sydney L.Nunez
17/05/2019

SolidBody 17(Pipe 25.4 x


1.6(11)[8])(Space_Frame_201
9),
SolidBody 18(Pipe 25.4 x
1.6(11)[5])(Space_Frame_201
9),
SolidBody 19(Pipe 25.4 x
1.6(11)[12])(Space_Frame_20
19),
SolidBody 20(Bulk
Boss[4])(Space_Frame_2019),
SolidBody 21(Engine
Boss[3])(Space_Frame_2019),
SolidBody 22(Engine
Boss[2])(Space_Frame_2019),
SolidBody 23(Engine
Boss[1])(Space_Frame_2019),
SolidBody 24(Pipe 25.4 x
1.6(11)[9])(Space_Frame_201
9),
SolidBody 25(Engine
Boss[4])(Space_Frame_2019),
SolidBody 26(Pipe 25.4 x
1.6(11)[15])(Space_Frame_20
19),
SolidBody 27(Pipe 25.4 x
1.6(11)[7])(Space_Frame_201
9),
SolidBody 28(Pipe 25.4 x
1.6(11)[19])(Space_Frame_20
19)
Curve Data:N/A

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of Space_Frame_2019 12


The University of Sydney L.Nunez
17/05/2019

Loads and Fixtures


Fixture name Fixture Image Fixture Details
Entities: 4 Joint(s)
Type: Fixed Geometry

Fixed-1

Load name Load Image Load Details


Entities: 4 Joint(s)
Type: Apply force
Values: ---, ---, -357 N
Force-1 Moments: ---, ---, -68 N.m

Connector Definitions
No Data

Contact Information
No Data

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of Space_Frame_2019 13


The University of Sydney L.Nunez
17/05/2019

Mesh information
Mesh type Beam Mesh

Mesh information - Details


Total Nodes 914
Total Elements 571
Time to complete mesh(hh;mm;ss): 00:00:03
Computer name: W2JQR9M2

Sensor Details
No Data

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of Space_Frame_2019 14


The University of Sydney L.Nunez
17/05/2019

Resultant Forces
Reaction forces
Selection set Units Sum X Sum Y Sum Z Resultant
Entire Model N -163.634 -1418.59 1.52588e-05 1428

Reaction Moments
Selection set Units Sum X Sum Y Sum Z Resultant
Entire Model N.m 4.66017 -47.7903 25.9245 54.5684

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of Space_Frame_2019 15


The University of Sydney L.Nunez
17/05/2019

Beams
Beam Forces
Beam Joint Moment1(N. Moment2(N. Torque(N.
Axial(N) Shear1(N) Shear2(N)
Name s m) m) m)
Beam- -1.25214e- 4.67302e- 1.01379e-
1 8.35973e-11 -2.3878e-10 -8.31962e-10
1(Pipe 10 11 10
25.4 x 2 -889.867 10.6791 -8.50402 6.01065 3.54456 -1.92724
1.6(11)[20
]) 3 889.867 -10.6794 8.50305 -1.06248 2.66969 1.92724
Beam- 1 6.63496 -8.10667 2.46168 -0.65651 1.17791 -1.10838
3(Pipe 2 -26.2824 -0.515445 -2.55884 1.72389 -0.987205 1.16411
25.4 x
1.6(11)[13 3 -21.4287 -1.08463 -0.0731559 0.380748 0.317063 -0.0290642
])
-6.32655e- 8.42816e- 2.60031e-
Beam- 1 -1.67594e-12 -1.74183e-12 -5.4555e-13
11 12 11
4(Bulk
1.13343e- 3.22163e- 6.18094e-
Boss[3]) 2 6.51339e-12 5.62481e-12 1.77746e-12
10 11 11
Beam- 1 -16.5827 1.9914 0.0836005 0.0314134 -0.219928 -0.0851009
5(Pipe 2 55.7573 -56.4426 14.8259 0.281534 -2.12476 1.36007
25.4 x
1.6(11)[14 3 -126.098 120.305 -26.3033 -5.56438 -15.23 -2.86028
])
- -
0.00082165
Beam- 1 0.00018057 0.00050396 9.63409e-05 -3.60602e-05 3.84939e-05
7
6(Pipe 6 7
25.4 x -
0.00018057 0.00050396
1.6(11)[2]) 2 0.00082165 0.000196177 -6.87518e-05 -3.84939e-05
6 7
7
Beam- 1 324.352 -13.8438 15.0114 2.52055 1.97252 -5.54763
7(Pipe 2 -324.352 13.8439 -15.0114 -10.3127 -9.15861 5.54763
25.4 x
1.6(11)[21 3 -801.74 6.16486 -14.9283 8.54671 2.09523 -1.07414
])
Beam- 1 127.624 48.0835 9.11332 0.585187 -11.2547 2.95184
8(Pipe
25.4 x
2 -127.624 -48.0835 -9.11331 3.75062 -11.6218 -2.95184
1.6(11)[18
])
Beam- 1 -0.805871 5.39899 0.789928 0.0956401 -1.22306 -0.276718
9(Pipe
25.4 x 2 0.805871 -5.39899 -0.789928 0.0807362 0.0175679 0.276718
1.6(11)[1])
Beam- 1 233.975 -235.846 235.477 -40.0759 6.46407 8.28037
10(Pipe -
2 0.00123095 -0.0105897 0.000165762 -9.56147e-05 -2.25175e-16
25.4 x 0.00610834

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of Space_Frame_2019 16


The University of Sydney L.Nunez
17/05/2019

1.6(11)[17 3 -8.02023 244.892 424.556 45.1306 19.5927 -15.7809


]) 4 -233.975 235.846 -235.477 4.21651 -42.3795 -8.28039
1 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 0.26573 0.304649 -0.544882 0.0935582 0.0514216 -0.315912
3 -1.34163 -0.696406 4.85411 1.63377 0.0805599 -0.219993
Beam-
-
11(Pipe 0.00031557 -1.34368e-
4 0.00052522 1.85721e-06 4.54997e-05 -8.75357e-06
25.4 x 8 05
2
1.6(11)[11
]) 5 -0.404192 0.00722074 -0.544882 -0.348179 -0.0228179 0.231035
-
0.00052522 1.34368e-
6 0.00031557 4.02547e-06 9.26618e-05 8.75357e-06
2 05
8
Beam- 1 -1096.18 -6.73267 -10.2888 -7.03106 1.70751 -1.93792
12(Pipe
25.4 x 2 1096.18 6.73392 10.2887 1.76959 1.73603 1.93791
1.6(11)[6])
Beam- 1 175.289 37.2978 -15.5102 -2.61115 -4.05504 0.737256
13(Pipe
25.4 x 2 -175.289 -37.298 15.5105 -0.413286 -3.21786 -0.737258
1.6(11)[3])
Beam- 1 -96.749 54.685 -3.88971 4.07088 6.32713 4.08364
14(Pipe
25.4 x
2 96.7489 -54.6851 3.88985 -2.92035 9.84764 -4.08364
1.6(11)[10
])
Beam- 1 29.3299 -124.892 -10.1869 -1.09769 31.2652 -0.260201
15(Pipe 2 28.0141 -125.175 -10.4162 0.0778017 16.2733 -0.349392
25.4 x 3 -28.0141 125.175 10.4162 -4.03834 31.3215 0.349392
1.6(11)[16
]) 4 28.0141 -125.175 -10.4162 2.78602 -16.2721 -0.349392
0.00014192 4.58347e- -4.72333e-
1 2.31555e-08 2.9069e-07 3.23674e-11
2 06 07
Beam- -
-3.12025e- -2.39172e-
16(Pipe 2 0.00014194 -4.4375e-08 2.60704e-07 -3.24546e-09
06 06
25.4 x 2
1.6(11)[4]) -
-3.12025e- -2.39172e-
3 0.00014194 -4.4375e-08 2.60704e-07 -3.24546e-09
06 06
2
Beam- 1 335.599 -98.7758 -160.884 18.438 -1.3182 -7.4772
17(Pipe
25.4 x 2 -335.599 98.7758 160.884 19.5929 -22.0311 7.47721
1.6(11)[8])
Beam- 1 -558.761 -15.6313 -13.8391 -8.27227 4.8185 -0.777598
18(Pipe
25.4 x 2 558.761 15.6321 13.8398 1.15383 3.2219 0.77759
1.6(11)[5])
7.93584e- 1.08679e- -8.89302e-
Beam- 1 1.65525e-10 3.15994e-08 5.49059e-10
07 08 09
19(Pipe
7.67255e- -2.01945e- 1.61903e-
25.4 x 2 4.30106e-09 6.8323e-08 -4.40411e-10
07 07 08

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of Space_Frame_2019 17


The University of Sydney L.Nunez
17/05/2019

1.6(11)[12 7.67255e- -2.01945e- 1.61903e-


3 4.30106e-09 6.8323e-08 -4.40411e-10
]) 07 07 08
1.35622e- 6.15186e-
Beam- 1 1.2203e-10 -2.40456e-12 -1.19677e-12 1.60848e-12
11 12
20(Bulk
-2.03546e- -2.51574e- -2.71234e-
Boss[4]) 2 6.49776e-12 2.25261e-12 -4.66944e-12
10 11 11
-5.47983e- -1.16186e- -5.2292e-
1 -2.58436e-15 2.77607e-12 -1.68876e-14
12 12 13
Beam-
-3.01634e- -5.84256e- -1.86456e-
21(Engine 2 5.04353e-15 -2.67952e-12 1.69135e-14
12 12 13
Boss[3])
5.47983e- 1.16186e-
3 5.2292e-13 1.82616e-14 -2.72603e-12 1.68876e-14
12 12
1.07861e- -1.60474e- -5.96421e-
1 -7.26588e-13 4.74939e-12 -3.91845e-12
11 11 12
3.11412e- -5.99455e- -8.38448e-
Beam- 2 6.60294e-13 -4.70203e-12 3.90708e-12
12 12 13
22(Engine
-1.07861e- 1.60474e- 5.96421e-
Boss[2]) 3 7.17238e-13 -4.55374e-12 3.91845e-12
11 11 12
1.07861e- -1.60474e- -5.96421e-
4 -7.26588e-13 4.74939e-12 -3.91845e-12
11 11 12
5.66005e- 3.80139e-
1 2.0904e-10 6.83152e-13 -4.39221e-12 4.00685e-12
11 11
5.66005e- 3.80139e-
Beam- 2 2.0904e-10 6.83152e-13 -4.39221e-12 4.00685e-12
11 11
23(Engine
-3.13615e- -1.41308e- 5.16119e-
Boss[1]) 3 8.50368e-13 -4.71269e-12 3.91566e-12
12 11 14
3.78883e- 5.17075e-
4 2.6807e-12 7.3801e-13 -4.81158e-12 3.91379e-12
11 12
Beam- 1 -160.704 42.2645 -58.77 -13.9292 -4.22366 -2.69026
24(Pipe 2 160.704 -42.2643 58.7701 -4.62253 -9.1178 2.69026
25.4 x
1.6(11)[9]) 3 0 0 0 0 0 0
1.08912e- -7.40396e- -3.55238e-
1 -4.6024e-13 4.32727e-12 -5.86128e-13
12 13 13
Beam-
-1.08912e- 7.40396e- 3.55238e-
25(Engine 2 4.46991e-13 -4.34565e-12 5.86128e-13
12 13 13
Boss[4])
-1.63715e- -1.04492e- 9.21826e-
3 4.42137e-13 -4.27914e-12 5.84813e-13
11 12 13
Beam- 1 -94.7914 13.9032 -9.99932 -1.58162 0.646701 0.580598
26(Pipe 2 -61.6753 -59.8433 26.6699 -1.66084 -0.221718 0.879511
25.4 x
1.6(11)[15 3 61.6753 59.8433 -26.6698 -1.67447 -7.26225 -0.87951
])
Beam- 1 -286.875 -130.156 82.8042 21.1184 21.8271 7.95646
27(Pipe
25.4 x 2 287.43 129.668 -81.6367 -0.345768 10.7972 -7.9934
1.6(11)[7])
1 240.554 -36.4646 56.5485 7.93559 11.8427 -7.11587

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of Space_Frame_2019 18


The University of Sydney L.Nunez
17/05/2019

Beam-
28(Pipe
25.4 x 2 -240.554 36.4648 -56.5484 21.6084 7.20843 7.11587
1.6(11)[19
])

Beam Stresses
Upper bound
Bending Bending Torsional
Beam Name Joints Axial(N/m^2) axial and
Dir1(N/m^2) Dir2(N/m^2) (N/m^2)
bending(N/m^2)
-
1 -1.04666e-06 0.000124775 0.000356395 0.000378653
Beam-1(Pipe 0.000620881
25.4 x -
2 7.43838e+06 -8.97132e+06 5.29051e+06 1.78535e+07
1.6(11)[20]) 1.43827e+06
3 7.43838e+06 -1.58582e+06 -3.9847e+06 1.43827e+06 1.1727e+07
Beam-3(Pipe 1 55461.5 -979887 -1.75811e+06 -827167 2.0682e+06
25.4 x 2 219694 -2.57302e+06 -1.47347e+06 868757 3.18475e+06
1.6(11)[13]) 3 -179122 568294 -473239 -21690.2 918657
Beam-4(Bulk 1 -1.24856e-07 -1.04174e-06 1.08269e-06 -1.69552e-07 1.62733e-06
Boss[3]) 2 -2.23685e-07 -4.04861e-06 3.49629e-06 5.52419e-07 5.57301e-06
1 -138614 55020.5 260923 -63509.5 405275
Beam-5(Pipe
2 -466074 -498891 -2.51998e+06 1.015e+06 3.03497e+06
25.4 x
1.6(11)[14]) -
3 -1.05405e+06 -7.70677e+06 1.77776e+07 2.04303e+07
2.13458e+06
Beam-6(Pipe 1 -6.86821 -143.795 -53.8224 28.7274 160.406
25.4 x
2 -6.86821 292.809 102.617 -28.7274 317.138
1.6(11)[2])
-
Beam-7(Pipe 1 -2.71125e+06 -3.7621e+06 2.94412e+06 7.4884e+06
4.14011e+06
25.4 x
2 -2.71125e+06 -1.53925e+07 1.36699e+07 4.14011e+06 2.32975e+07
1.6(11)[21])
3 6.70172e+06 -1.27566e+07 3.12728e+06 -801617 1.9836e+07
Beam-8(Pipe 1 1.0668e+06 873433 1.67984e+07 2.20292e+06 1.78879e+07
25.4 x -
2 1.0668e+06 -5.59806e+06 -1.73464e+07 1.92941e+07
1.6(11)[18]) 2.20292e+06
Beam-9(Pipe 1 -6736.26 142750 1.82551e+06 -206510 1.83782e+06
25.4 x
2 -6736.26 -120504 26221.4 206510 130061
1.6(11)[1])
1 -1.95579e+06 5.98161e+07 9.64807e+06 6.17951e+06 6.25449e+07
Beam-10(Pipe 2 -10.2895 -247.412 -142.712 -1.68045e-10 295.91
25.4 x 3 -67040.9 6.73606e+07 -2.92434e+07 -1.1777e+07 7.35016e+07
1.6(11)[17]) -
4 -1.95579e+06 6.29343e+06 6.32544e+07 6.55225e+07
6.17953e+06
1 0 0 0 0 0
2 2221.24 139642 -76750.3 -235760 161565
Beam-11(Pipe
3 -11214.6 2.43851e+06 -120241 -164178 2.45269e+06
25.4 x
4 4.39032 -2.77201 67.9114 -6.53266 72.3583
1.6(11)[11])
5 -3378.64 -519681 34057.3 172418 524175
6 4.39032 6.0083 -138.304 6.53266 142.825

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of Space_Frame_2019 19


The University of Sydney L.Nunez
17/05/2019

Beam-12(Pipe -
1 -9.16294e+06 -1.04944e+07 -2.54857e+06 1.99623e+07
25.4 x 1.44624e+06
1.6(11)[6]) 2 -9.16294e+06 -2.64123e+06 2.59115e+06 1.44624e+06 1.2863e+07
Beam-13(Pipe 1 1.46524e+06 -3.89732e+06 6.05242e+06 550203 8.66392e+06
25.4 x
2 1.46524e+06 616858 -4.80287e+06 -550205 6.30756e+06
1.6(11)[3])
Beam-14(Pipe 1 808723 -6.07607e+06 9.44368e+06 3.04756e+06 1.20382e+07
25.4 x -
2 808722 -4.35882e+06 -1.46983e+07 1.61397e+07
1.6(11)[10]) 3.04756e+06
1 245168 -1.63838e+06 -4.66656e+07 -194184 4.69395e+07
Beam-15(Pipe
2 234169 116124 -2.42891e+07 -260746 2.45235e+07
25.4 x
3 234169 6.0275e+06 4.67496e+07 260746 4.73707e+07
1.6(11)[16])
4 234169 4.15833e+06 2.42872e+07 -260746 2.48748e+07
Beam-16(Pipe 1 -1.18632 -0.0345611 0.433874 2.41553e-05 1.62157
25.4 x 2 -1.18649 -0.0662328 -0.389119 -0.00242204 1.5812
1.6(11)[4]) 3 -1.18649 -0.0662328 -0.389119 -0.00242204 1.5812
Beam-17(Pipe -
1 -2.80527e+06 -2.752e+07 -1.96751e+06 3.03955e+07
25.4 x 5.58013e+06
1.6(11)[8]) 2 -2.80527e+06 2.92437e+07 3.28829e+07 5.58013e+06 4.68107e+07
Beam-18(Pipe 1 -4.67067e+06 -1.23469e+07 -7.19195e+06 -580310 1.89595e+07
25.4 x
2 -4.67067e+06 -1.72217e+06 4.80892e+06 580304 9.77866e+06
1.6(11)[5])
1 -0.00663355 -0.000247058 0.0471644 0.000409755 0.0537986
Beam-19(Pipe -
2 0.00641347 0.00641963 -0.101977 0.108592
25.4 x 0.000328672
1.6(11)[12]) -
3 0.00641347 0.00641963 -0.101977 0.108592
0.000328672
Beam-20(Bulk 1 2.40829e-07 -1.49463e-06 7.43892e-07 4.99903e-07 1.91035e-06
Boss[4]) 2 4.01704e-07 -4.03889e-06 1.40018e-06 -1.45122e-06 4.67642e-06
Beam- 1 6.14352e-09 6.87803e-10 7.38824e-07 -2.24723e-09 7.44968e-07
21(Engine 2 3.38167e-09 -1.34229e-09 -7.13127e-07 2.25068e-09 7.1651e-07
Boss[3]) 3 6.14352e-09 4.86014e-09 7.25506e-07 2.24723e-09 7.31666e-07
1 -1.20925e-08 1.93374e-07 1.264e-06 -5.21428e-07 1.2908e-06
Beam-
2 -3.49129e-09 -1.75731e-07 -1.2514e-06 5.19916e-07 1.26717e-06
22(Engine
3 -1.20925e-08 1.90886e-07 1.21193e-06 5.21428e-07 1.23897e-06
Boss[2])
4 -1.20925e-08 1.93374e-07 1.264e-06 -5.21428e-07 1.2908e-06
1 -2.34358e-07 -1.81814e-07 -1.16894e-06 5.33191e-07 1.41736e-06
Beam-
2 -2.34358e-07 -1.81814e-07 -1.16894e-06 5.33191e-07 1.41736e-06
23(Engine
3 3.51599e-09 -2.26317e-07 -1.25424e-06 5.21058e-07 1.27801e-06
Boss[1])
4 4.24771e-08 1.96414e-07 1.28055e-06 5.20809e-07 1.33801e-06
Beam-24(Pipe 1 -1.34332e+06 -2.07902e+07 6.30411e+06 -2.0077e+06 2.30683e+07
25.4 x 2 -1.34332e+06 6.89944e+06 -1.36089e+07 2.0077e+06 1.66013e+07
1.6(11)[9]) 3 0 0 0 0 0
Beam- 1 1.22103e-09 -1.22488e-07 -1.15166e-06 -7.79961e-08 1.15938e-06
25(Engine 2 1.22103e-09 -1.18962e-07 -1.15655e-06 7.79961e-08 1.16387e-06
Boss[4]) 3 -1.83544e-08 1.1767e-07 1.13885e-06 7.78211e-08 1.16327e-06
1 -792359 -2.36068e+06 -965247 433292 3.34275e+06
2 515542 2.47892e+06 -330930 656366 3.01646e+06

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of Space_Frame_2019 20


The University of Sydney L.Nunez
17/05/2019

Beam-26(Pipe
25.4 x 3 515542 -2.49927e+06 1.08394e+07 -656365 1.16394e+07
1.6(11)[15])
Beam-27(Pipe 1 -2.39798e+06 3.15207e+07 -3.25785e+07 5.93779e+06 4.77291e+07
25.4 x -
2 -2.40262e+06 516083 1.61155e+07 1.85264e+07
1.6(11)[7]) 5.96536e+06
Beam-28(Pipe -
1 2.01079e+06 1.18444e+07 -1.76761e+07 2.32884e+07
25.4 x 5.31047e+06
1.6(11)[19]) 2 2.01079e+06 -3.2252e+07 1.07591e+07 5.31047e+06 3.601e+07

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of Space_Frame_2019 21


The University of Sydney L.Nunez
17/05/2019

Study Results

Name Type Min Max


Stress1 Upper bound axial and bending 0.000e+00 N/m^2 7.350e+07 N/m^2
Element: 330 Element: 234

Space_Frame_2019-Torque 1-Stress-Stress1

Name Type Min Max


Displacement1 URES: Resultant Displacement 0.000e+00 mm 5.500e-01 mm
Node: 22 Node: 23

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of Space_Frame_2019 22


The University of Sydney L.Nunez
17/05/2019

Space_Frame_2019-Torque 1-Displacement-Displacement1

Name Type
Displacement1{1} Deformed shape

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of Space_Frame_2019 23


The University of Sydney L.Nunez
17/05/2019

Space_Frame_2019-Torque 1-Displacement-Displacement1{1}

Conclusion

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of Space_Frame_2019 24

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen