Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
PEOPLE V. LINSANGAN
GR 885859 April 16, 1991 GRINO-AQUINO
[Art 3 - Sec. 12] Created by: Meluvin
Petitioners Respondents
People of the Philippines Carlito Linsangan y Diaz
Recit Ready Summary
The police operatives of a Drug Enforcement unit were informed that there was a pusher who was a boy of 20 years, 5’5” in
height, and of ordinary build. He was allegedly selling marijuana to anybody, regardless of age in Dinalupihan Street, Tondo,
Manila. The members of the unit organized a “buy-bust” operation. Two P10 bills were marked by Patrolman Corpus with his
initials “TC.” They bought 10 cigarette sticks of rolled marijuana for P20 from Linsangan. When he was handing them the
marijuana, Pat. Corpuz took them with his right hand and grabbed the accused with his other hand. Pat. Ruiz frisked
Linsangan and retrieved the marked P10 bills tucked in his waist. He asked the appellant to sign the bills. In the police station,
appellant also put his initials “CL” on each stick
The issue is W/N appellant was denied due process during the custodial investigation. The Court ruled NO. Although he was
not assisted by counsel when he initialed the P10 bills tucked in his waist, his right against self-incrimination was not violated
for his possession of the marked crimes did not constitute a crime; the subject of the prosecution was his act of selling
marijuana cigarettes. His conviction was not based on the presence of his initials on the bills, but on the fact that the trial court
believed the testimony of the policemen that they arrested him while he was actually engaged in selling marijuana.
Issues Ruling
1. W/N appellant was denied due process during the custodial investigation. No
Rationale/Analysis/Legal Basis
- The court’s assessment of the credibility of the prosecution's witnesses is entitled to great respect unless and until
they are clearly shown to be arbitrary. Some inconsistencies in the affidavit of arrest only involved minor details
which do not affect the overall picture of the case.
- Although he was not assisted by counsel when he initialed the P10 bills tucked in his waist, his right against
self-incrimination was not violated for his possession of the marked crimes did not constitute a crime; the subject of
the prosecution was his act of selling marijuana cigarettes.
- His conviction was not based on the presence of his initials on the bills, but on the fact that the trial court believed
the testimony of the policemen that they arrested him while he was actually engaged in selling marijuana.
Disposition
Dismissed for lack of merit.