Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Infrared optical constants collected from the literature are tabulated. The data for the noble metals and
Al, Pb, and W can be reasonably fit using the Drude model. It is shown that -El(W) = E2(W) 2/(2w') at
the damping frequency c = c,. Also -El(w T) _ - (1/2) el(0), where the plasma frequency is op.
in the AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS where c, cop,and '-v,have units of cm-'. Separating the
HANDBOOK. 4 However, this includes data only up real and imaginary parts yields
to 1967. Except for a few cases, the data presented here W2
105 105
14)N 14)
In
In Z
kV
Z
102 102
101 101
100 100
102 103 105 00 102 103
FREQUENC.W (CM'1) FREQUENCY,
W (CM'l
Fig. 1. Aluminum: -el(w) and 2(M) vs frequency. The solid line Fig. 3. Gold: -e,(w) and e2(W) vs frequency. The solid line is the
is the Drude model. The data from Ref. 7 are: Shiles et al., o for Drude model. The data from Ref. 9 are: Bennett and Bennett, *
both -el and 2; Bennett and Bennett * for -El and 2; Schulz, 0 for for both -el and e2; Schulz, 0 for both; Motulevich and Shubin, for
-el and 2- both; Padalka and Shklyarevskii, 0 for both; Bolotin et al., x for both;
Brandli and Sievers, + for both; Weaver et al., A for both.
106
105
104
14)
nLI
C3
Z 3
a: 10
Z 3
W(I a: 10
tv
101
10'
ino
10100 l2 103 104 105
10a
FREQUENCY,
W (CM') 102 103 105
1
Fig. 2. Copper: -el(W) and 2(O) vs frequency. The solid line is FREQUENCY,
W (CM )
the Drude model. The data from Ref. 8 are: Schulz, 0 for both -el Fig. 4. Lead: -e l(w) and e2(u) vs frequency. The solid line rep-
and 2; Lenham and Treherne, * for -el and 2; Robusto and resents the Drude model. The data from Ref. 10 are: Brandli and
Braunstein, o3for both; Hageman et al., X for both; and Dold and Sievers, x for -el and + for 2; and Golovashkin and Motulevich, A
Mecke, A for both. for -el and oIfor 2-
105
0'&x
O0
14 AX
14) ox°x
In
r-
Z 2
a: 10
In
14) it AOA
XA
4,
-
X
10I
100 o 0 11 5
100 3
10 10I 102 10 10 t02 103 104 105
FREQUENCY,W(CM'] FREQUENCT,W(CMI)
Fig. 5. Silver: -l(co) and E2(0) vs frequency. The solid line is the Fig. 7. Iron: -el(w) and f2() vs frequency. The data from Ref.
Drude model. The data from Ref. 11are: Bennett and Bennett, * 13 are: Weaver et al., X for -El and A for E2;Bolotin et al., 0 for-El
for both -el and e2; Schulz, 0 for both; and Hagemann et al., X for and 0 for f2-
both.
10L1 I I I I
+ -E
x
+x
x _-E
103 103 x I
A X
2 Ex
A X
In,
A + A x
A+
14)1 14) -E A, x
2 A"
M
M
a: 10
2
En
z 102
XM Ina: AX
A A
.W0A
xoo
0 D
X
X0 a
101 10'
X AI 40
,< 4,,
4,
1 1 I I I~~~~~~~~~~~~~4
100 100 . . . . . .
103 104 105 t2 103 104 105
1o'
FREQUENCT,
W (CM') FREQUENCY.
W (CM')
Fig. 6. Colbalt: -el(c) and 2(M) vs frequency. The data from Ref.
12 are: Kirillova and Charikov, + for -el and 0 for e2; Johnson and Fig. 8. Nickel: -el(co) and 42(W) vs frequency. The data from Ref.
Christy, 0 for -el and 0 for 42;and Weaver et al, x for -el and Afor 14 are: Lynch et al., X for-c and A for E2;Johnson and Christy, 0
e2. for -el and 0 for 2-
-4
n I
103
0
2 4,
-E2 ,C+ ,,
+ 1.
c~14J
z 102 + 0x
2J _
A
In+ 0
In
10'
_ x * 10
*
PRLLRDIUM A
x
X.&
x
I I I I I I
100
1o' 103 104 105 102 103 104 105
FREQUENCT,
W (CM') FREQUENCY,W(CM'I)
Fig. 9. Palladium: -(W) and 42(C) vs frequency. The data from Fig. 11. Titanium: -el(w) and 42(W) vs frequency. The data from
Ref. 15 are: Weaver and Benbow, 0 for -el and 0 for 2; Bolotin et Ref. 17 are: Kirillova and Charikov, for both -el and 2; Lynch et
al., + for -el and for 2; Johnson and Christy, X for -el and A for al., A for both; Johnson and Christy, 0 for both; Kirillova and
42. Charikov, + for both; Bolotin et al., X for both.
14 7-- - ,_. I I I I I I
106
A _E
In 105
AA
_
-E2
IAA
nA
In 104
In
14)
A A 14
BMma In
. ~ ~~~~ I
102
10' A
PLRTINUM
100
100 -
3 . .
100
103 104 10O lOu 102 103
FREQUENCT,
W (CM ) FREQUENCY,
W (CMI)
Fig. 12. Tungsten: -l(w) and 42(W)vs frequency. The solid line
Fig. 10. Platinum: -(co) and 42(W)
vs frequency. The data from is the Drude model. The data from Ref. 18are: Nomerovannaya et
Ref. 16 are Weaver et al., A for -el and 03for 42. al., 03for both -el and 42; Weaver et al., A for both.
w(cm-') x(Pm) - 1 42 n K
w(cm-1) -4 1 42 n IC
AXcm-l) ( 1 m) -41 42 n k
w(cm- 1) x0tm) - 1 42 n k
w(cm-') MIt m) -4 1 42 n PI
1
(cm ) x(m) -41 42 n K
w(cm-i) X(0m) -4 1 42 n P
W(cm-i) X(Pm) -4 1 42 n PI
w( cm- 1 ) X( Lm) - 1 42 n k
04 4 444z 44444
C4
N V OaJ rNV M' 0 O0
44 1Il
t N N
4 + 4 4 c4
N
4
e4N, VsssN
Ne
44~ 4 4 44444
M0
4 4 444
-4 -- -'
44
- - -O
1 1
0.
'0 oNvN-0'N
I,
0
M co . m o eJ
in It CO0D h 0 1 1 0 *I t0 M e N Nes N - - w - o0 o: h v N- h
. . . . * . * . . . * . . . * . . . . . . . . . . . . . * . . . . . . . . . . ....
E1 - -r - -N
In - - - - - - - -oooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
C4
co m 0o ODMN 1 In In
00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 N N---o tD In91 M M
WV m m M M M M M MCv
N N N NM i tNN
NN
44444444444444444444444444444444444444444444
-o -'-0.00
N
- 4 - N-4 4-NM.N
----------
h N N h NI I NN
In In Ih- NI4 N
I N -I NN
I (~ I I4 NNNNNN.3
I I N I 'O
I I I I I 0I-'o0
I N'N0NNNNMMM-MMMMMMMVVOID I 'NNNNNNNNN
I mI3N I N'0U
I I I )O'i
I V
I I I
c
LUULLLUU LUULLI LU LULU LUUUUU
r LILLUU LUL
t LrULtUL ULULUL UL UL UL UL ULI
o o o o o o o o .oo oo o o o o o o o o o
0 3 N .^ S
N'lhJ0 ~l1.1t^1tJ
' 0 4 . 4l. . 4S
t. . u 4. l^ C1. ^l N^ (S10li jS <^]S
ia.
*0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t0 0 0 0 t0 t0 t0 t0 06 0N 0es 0N 0 0e 0t4 0 4 00e
s 4 0 N0 ts0 0 0
N
UI -NNoeotwcooeXl>rco0Nbno~-~tsc
3
L. L U L L cLo-
LI L L L -L U- U U
- -I -U L UNU
U U U UL eL i L Lt L iII
IL L L Lt L M M LMUtLstJ
U L L II L LU
- - -00000--- ------ O
000000000000000 0000000000000
444444444+44444 44+4444444+44
LUL USULULSULiU LU
W
X. NN- 0 MMV10V0,
4. . 0 00'NW
('4.N(')-40ocbON-
0'4 W)VI) (' 3 n mW
0
x 0N0000con0nno
N 31M N - PI
1 OD 10
z
In4.4.4.(1)C1)CN
- - -0 .CO
'ov)4 M4C4
ts es ts
4 ti -- _--N In
N
000000000000000
000000000000000 0000000000000
- -000000 000 00
OK
C
C 4oM D4
0- In N NM
0. ...............
M
0
Iii
00000000000000
VM.MMMMMVVMMNN- 0 * . +4
* .1. 4 4 4 4
C
N4.C)C'7'NW nONto @
241
NNNNNNNNN-----
00000000000 000
(14NN
_3_ N (0(1t) '0I--'4 It
NN'1NNNCN'N
0000000000000
('. o'V rX
'a 0 N: 10 v 0
M N U0 W
. ... . .... ..... .
VMMNNN---O¢N- IV
c LU LI LUW iU LU LU L LI LI LI LI LU
m
.. . ...... ..
N 0 01 -t 0,
h v 1 0 nt O
0 N
O N
~t0 CD
0
N-N-N-N--WVWN0-
I
.44
-o0000000000--
000'000000 4o0oooo0
a. > ' 0. . . . . 0. .0
NNN - 0 1)-- 4-0C0N
c 4'
0000000000000
-
_ a -v ->) v 1 N 0 M
-I ............... N ' - -a N 0 -jco
a: o --- 0---hO MN 0 M
-4 LU LI LU WSuLUu L L LI LU LU
N N~N~ cncXM!M MM cX 0r4
0.,^
a> O O,CD
- W, N 4 N WO LI.
0000000000000
0. *L E + ..... WS .. . 1.1. . .
2 mcvvmoO-OMOOmM
--- bl t)wtr
EI
............... U
. z 0 0 9C:-
N
I X m UlOW0 . 0----- NNM4
m
aE n I-tD L
(cm-i) X(Im) - 1 n k
W(cm-l) XU t M) -41 42 n K
w( cm-i) X(Pm) -4 1 42 n k
w(cm-1) X(Im) - 1 42 n P.
( cm-l) )(Pm) - 1 (2 n k1
Table 13. OpticalParametersFoundusinga DrudeModelFit of the ExperimentalDielectricFunctionsfor Six Metalsfor which the DielectricFunctions
could be Fit; herew,Isthe Frequencyat which the Fit is Forced,and -e1 (0) is -el (w) at dc; the CrossoverFrequencyAppliesto -el e2
Pb 5.00xlOl 1.45xl0
3
6.20xl04 1.33xl03 1.35xl03 1.55xl03
2
Ag l.00x103 1.45xlo2 7.25xlO
4
2.50xl05 1.41xlo2 1.52x10
Transition Metals
2
W 8.06xlO2 4.33xl02 4.84xl0
4
1.25xl04 2.16x102 4.30xl0
The one exception to this process was the measure- IV. Data
ments of Brandli and Sievers' for Au and Pb. They
reported values of R(w)/Zo where Zo = (47r)/c. For the Figures 1-12 are plots of -EI(c) and e2(W) for the
far IR, Eq. (11) reduces to twelve metals. The high frequency termination occurs
where the Drude model becomes invalid. The solid
lines are calculated from the Drude model with the
Z &2) (14) parameters listed in Table 13. Tables 1-12 present the
cwwas obtained from this data using co, from the near
1
collected values of El, E2, n and k. Table 13 summarizes
IR fit. This value of c, was used for gold and lead the Drude model parameters from our fit (for Ag, Au,
rather than the co obtained from the near IR fit. Cu, Al, Pb, and W) as well as co,calculated from copand
We note from Eq. (12) the frequency for which -el(co) the AIP Handbook 9 values of the dc resistivity. Di-
e2((.) is very nearly w = cT since -el >> 1. With w = electric functions for all metals considered in this article
OT,both components (-El and 2) of the dielectric except Pb have been tabulated by Weaver et al. for the
function are cw2/(2co2). Thus the Drude parameters, co, UV, visible, and near IR.
and cop,can be determined at the crossover from co= c, Finally, we disclaim any physical signficance for the
and the value of the dielectric function. Note that Drude model. The intent is only to parametrize the
2
-E 1 (O) wco/Cd2 ; so -/2el(0) - E(Cr)- optical constants for these metals even when there is
7 Interferogram showing creditable accuracy of the concave 8 Grindingthe cone using a flat diamond wheel and the correct
surface. tilt angle. The work rotates at 100 rpm, the diamond wheel at
5000 surface ft/min.