Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
SLIDE 11
ORDER OF EXPROPRIATION
Declaration that that plaintiff has a lawful right to take the property for the
public use or public purpose described in the complaint upon the payment of just
compensation
When issued:
(a) In the event the objections of the defendant are overruled; or
(b) When no party appears to object to or defend against the expropriation
(Sec.4, Rule 67)
SLIDE 12
SLIDE 13
Just Compensation – Full and fair equivalent of property taken (LBP v. Obias)
(a) Correct amount paid
(b) Reasonable time of payment
SLIDE 15
APPOINTMENT OF COMMISSIONERS
Mandatory
Absence of trial or hearing with aid of commissioners constitutes violation of
right to due process (NPC v. de la Cruz)
Duties:
1. View and examine the property and its surroundings, and may measure the
same, after which the parties may argue the case
2. Assess the consequential damages/benefits to the property not taken (In no
case shall consequential benefits assessed exceed the consequential damages
assessed, or the owner be deprived of the actual value of his property)
SLIDE 16
COMMISSIONER’S REPORT
Court may
1. Order commissioners to report when any particular portion of the real estate
shall have been passed upon by them
2. Render judgment upon such partial report
3. Direct commissioners to proceed with their work as to subsequent portions
of the property sought, and may from time to time so deal with such property
Commissioners shall make full and accurate report of all their proceedings, and such
shall not be effectual until the court accepted it and rendered judgment in
accordance with their recommendations .
SLIDE 17
COURT ACTION
Court may:
1. Accept report and render judgment in accordance therewith
2. For cause, recommit the same to the commissioners for further report of
facts
3. Set aside report and appoint new commissioners
4. Accept report in part and reject in part
SLIDE 18
SLIDE 19
SLIDE 20
Effect of non-payment of JC
SLIDE 21
SLIDE 22
3 Complaints were filed for the expropriation of subject lots. Court issued
writ of possession.
Zaballeros filed separate motions for partial and/or provisional payment in 2
cases (Granted at P7.75/sq.m.)
In the 3rd case Zaballero moved for delivery of the PNB deposits of NHA.
(Granted)
Final determination of JC in each of the cases was at P7.75/sq.m.
NHA: Applying PD No. 76, JC should only be P1.00/sq.m
SLIDE 23
Preliminary deposit serves the double purpose of a prepayment upon the value of
the property, if finally expropriated; and as an indemnity against damage in the
eventuality that the proceedings should fail of consummation
SLIDE 24
Since courts must first construe acts of government conformably with the
Constitution, the proper, nay, inexorable, meaning to be given the cited Presidential
Decrees should be that the rules therein enumerated are intended merely to provide
guidelines for the courts as they go about their functions of determining just
compensation.
SLIDE 25
Dec. 10, 1999 – Court declared that NHA has lawful right to expropriate the
properties (No Appeal)
August 7,2000 – Court rendered partial judgment adopting recommendation
of Commissioners on the amount of JC (MR denied)
October 11,2000 – Entry of Judgment, subsequently, Motion for Execution
was granted
July 16, 2001 – NHA filed a Motion to Dismiss the complaint for eminent
domain (denied)
May 27, 2002 – Sheriff served on LBP Notice of Garnishment against deposits
of NHA
SLIDE 26
Without an appeal, the Order becomes final and executory, can no longer be
disturbed no matter how erroneous it may be.
SLIDE 27
GR: Funds and properties of the government cannot be the object of garnishment
proceedings even if the consent to be sued had been previously granted and the
state liability adjudged.