Sie sind auf Seite 1von 2

Challenges to democracy

Zahid HussainMay 23, 2018

Facebook Count382
Twitter Share

The writer is an author and journalist.

DEFYING the doubters, the National Assembly will complete its five-year term next week. Notwithstanding the
thunderbolts that frequently jolted the political process, the system has survived. Transition from one elected government
to another now appears a reality, though there are still a few hurdles to cross.

It will indeed be a high point in the country’s rocky democratic journey. These five years like the previous ones have also
been extremely tumultuous, in which yet another elected prime minister has bitten the dust. The unceremonious ouster of
arguably the country’s most powerful elected figure continues to cast long shadows over the fragile democratic political

Already barred from the electoral process for life, the exit may mark the end of Nawaz Sharif’s long yet chequered
political career, though not the end of the Sharif political dynasty. The elections would certainly lead to a changing of the
guard but can that bring any qualitative transformation in the system?

It remains to be seen whether the much-touted transition could change the existing power dynamics and bring political
stability to the country or would it result in further weakening of the elected bodies, with non-elected institutions filling
the void. The apprehensions about installation of a hybrid political system with the military and judiciary becoming an
informal part of the power troika are not without reason. In fact the country is already experiencing this creeping

Instead of an improved quality of democracy, Pakistan has been

sliding in the opposite direction.
It is not just imbalance of power and persistent confrontation among various institutions of the state that has caused the
disorder; the political leadership too is responsible for undermining the democratic process. Parliament has been reduced
to a chaotic debating club with the leadership showing no deference to the elected house.

Members and top political leaders alike show little respect for legislative proceedings as attendance frequently falls way
below the 25pc mark leading to premature adjournments and even prorogation. During the four years when he was in
power, Sharif seldom attended parliamentary sessions. His slogan “give respect to the vote” sounds hollow, given his utter
contempt for the elected forums.

Some of the opposition parties too have been responsible for undermining the role of parliament. The PTI boycotted the
National Assembly for almost one year and Imran Khan never refrained from expressing his disdain for the elected forum.
He rarely appeared in the house, even after the party ended the boycott.

Moreover, when they did deign to be present in the assembly, parliamentarians would hardly participate in debate, even on
important national and foreign policy issues thereby rendering the legislative body ineffective. This has also led to the
inability of the lawmakers to resolve political and institutional crises. Unsurprisingly, the country failed to make a steady
transition towards improved democracy.

Despite the fact that Pakistan has entered the longest uninterrupted period of elected civilian rule in its history, democracy
appears to be weakening. While elected governments and political leadership ceded space in policy spheres, the military
has increased its overreach into areas outside of its professional domain.

With parliament and the civilian law-enforcement agencies having been rendered ineffective by the elected leadership,
weak governance has allowed the judiciary to extend its role. Some judges too appear to have succumbed to populist
pressures when they give mostly unwarranted observations during the course of judicial proceedings.
Lack of internal policy cohesion and focus on national issues has further weakened the democratic process. One of the
factors obstructing the growth of a democratic culture and ethos has been the absence of democracy within the political
parties. Most have turned into family enterprises or revolve around personalities.

There is no tradition of internal party debate on critical policy issues and it all depends on the whims of the leaders. Party
elections are a sham and conducted merely for the sake of fulfilling a legal formality. The swiftness with which politicians
change their party affiliations overnight for the sake of expediency, and the manner in which political parties woo so-
called ‘electables’ illustrate the lack of principles in our political culture.

Instead of a steady transition towards an improvement in the quality of democracy, Pakistan has been sliding in the
opposite direction more rapidly since 2013 when the PML-N returned to power and Nawaz Sharif was elected as prime
minister for a record third time.

According to a report by the Pakistan Institute of Legislative Development and Transparency, while the quality of
democracy in 2013 scored its highest in four years at 54pc, the scores slid 10 percentage points in 2014 to 44pc, rose a
little to 50pc in 2015 and slipped again to 46pc at the end of 2016. The situation has become worse in the past two years.

The challenge to democracy in Pakistan has worsened because there is a lack of crucially required reforms. There has not
been any substantive improvement in the fundamental functioning of key democratic institutions. The failure of parliament
in resolving issues such as the Panama scandal and the inability of the government to take the lead in formulating national
security and foreign policies have further eroded civilian control.

The government’s failure in institutionalising a consultative decision-making process too has been a major factor in the
expansion of space for unelected institutions such as the military and judiciary. Another aspect of the systemic failure of
democratic governance is its inability to deliver on critical economic, social and political issues. That has resulted in
waning public faith in democracy.

These are the vital issues plaguing the country’s political process. The coming elections are critical to the future of
democracy in the country. Following this exercise, the new parliament and the government will have to address these key
issues in order to consolidate governance and deliver to the electorate. It is apparent that democracy cannot function
without the rule of law. There is a need for fundamental structural reform to achieve these objectives. Will our leaders
learn from their own shortcomings and take the country to democratic stabilit