Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Parallel Class : Y
We the undersigned ( group 1 ) declare that the attached task is purely the result of our
own work. No work of others that we used without citing sources.
This report does not / has not been served / is used as the material for the duty on other
subjects unless we stated clearly that we use.
We understand that we collect this task may be reproduced or communicated for the
purpose of detecting the presence of plagiarism.
If we are guilty of fraud then we are ready to accept the sanction did not pass and black list.
I. BACKGROUND PROFILE
TOP Co. is a business entity that focusing on producing furniture and selling the product
to the local and international market. The table shows us that the sales of furniture are going
stable eventhough during September, 2017 the company faced some losses. In order to
increasing their profit, the company doing evaluation in quality of product and price to gain
some profit.
Every company which is runs their business in manufacturing company needs raw
materials to produce a product. TOP co. also needs raw material to produce furniture. The
company has already classified their raw materials such as wood, mdf, veneer, plywood, and
various types of paint. TOP Co. also have overhead cost such as bolts, nuts, glue, sandpaper,
and handle. Along through the production process, TOP Co. engaged labour with varying
salaries.
In order to solve the defective products due to errors or omissions during production
process. TOP Co. categorized into scrap and rework. It will be defined as scrap when the issues
are appear caused by the loss of unavoidable waste of wood by volume purchased then it will
be compensated to the revenue from scrap sold. In different way, it will be defined as rework
when the defects are assume to absorb the cost of labour and overhead in full amount, but there
is no need to added some of materials.
CHAPTER II
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
The unit product cost equals total product cost divided by the number of units produced
1. Make or Buy
Make or Buy is the decision involve a choice between internal and external production,
about whether to make a particular product or to purchase it from an outside supplier.
𝑃𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑒 𝑢𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑚𝑎𝑟𝑘𝑢𝑝 = 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝑡 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑡 + (𝑐𝑜𝑠𝑡 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑡 𝑥 𝑚𝑎𝑟𝑘𝑢𝑝 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑔𝑒)
CHAPTER III
ANALYSIS
Table 3.3.1
Description of Direct Labor Cost for 2017
Total Direct Total Annual
Number of Wage Per Day +
Production Stage Labor Cost per Direct Labor
Direct Labor Meal Allowance
day Cost
Cutting (Stage 1) 6 person Rp. 39.294 Rp. 235.764 Rp. 80.159.760
Forming (Stage 2) 10 person Rp. 39.294 Rp. 392.940 Rp. 133.599.600
Finishing (Stage 3) 15 person Rp. 39.294 Rp. 589.410 Rp. 200.399.400
Lump sum wages in 120 person Rp. 34.000 Rp. 4.080.000 Rp.1.387.200.000
Stage 1
Lump sum wages in 160 person Rp. 34.000 Rp. 5.440.000 Rp.1.849.600.000
Stage 2
Lump sum wages in 220 person Rp. 34.000 Rp. 7.480.000 Rp.2.543.200.000
Stage 3
TOTAL 531 person Rp. 18.218.114 Rp.6.194.158.760
Source: Internal data of “TOP” CO., adapted
Tabel 3.3.3
Overhead Cost of “TOP” Co.
Year of 2017
If the company wants to make a costing, it would be better if the company uses
absorption costing because not only they have the data of variable cost, but also a
fixed costs is included. So the costs is more revealing about the actual costs for
making an item. But if the company wants to have a decision making, it would be
better if they use variable costing, because they did not reveal the fixed cost.
3.5 Tactical Decision
In this case, the segment is based on one of the direct materials, which is the rimba wood.
Assume that the cost to produce the rimba wood itself is Rp 1.150.000 . TOP Co. needs
direct material Rp 875.000 and direct labor Rp 275.000 . Tactical decision making is used
by the TOP Co. to determine the problem in obtaining the wood as the direct material of
furniture.
Step 1 : Problem : Maximizing profit
Step 2 : Alternative : Make or Buy
Step 3 : Cost : DM, DL, purchase price, depre. Expense
Benefit : Furniture sales
Step 4 : Cost : DM, DL, purchase price
Benefit :-
Make Buy
DM Rp 875.000 -
DL Rp 275.000 -
Purchase Rp 1.000.000
price
Total Cost Rp 1.150.000 Rp 1.000.000
Step 5 : Qualitative aspect
- The quality from the supplier
- Employee lay off
- Build cooperation
Step 6 : Tactical Decision Making
It is better for TOP Co. to buy the rimba woods from the supplier because it
cost less than produce it self.
From this calculation, it can be concluded that TOP Co. take around 21,08% profit from
the the cost.
Total Cost Rp 5.447.018.980 (100%) 𝑇ℎ𝑒 𝑀𝑎𝑟𝑘𝑢𝑝 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑒
Gross Profit Rp 1.148.185.544 (21,08%) 1.148.185.544
Net Sales – January Rp 6.595.204.524 (121,08%) =
5.447.018.980
= 21,08 %
CHAPTER IV
CONCLUSION
Top Co as the furniture company which sold the product either in local or international
market faced a downturn . The management of TOP Co is really seeking the best solution to
become cost leading company without sacrificing the standard quality for more customers in
the future. In the production term, there are the failure cost that should be reduced by TOP Co
since a lot of returned furniture were asked by the customer. These reworks and warranty claims
might be mitigated through the better performance and number of product testing. The
improvement on maintenance of machinery needs quite amount of extra cost eventhough this
big increase is worth of lowering rework and claim. Not only that, but a better policy for
selecting supplier will also lower the rework.
The other way to help the manager TOP Co is by using the Target-Cost Pricing to
determine the price of a product sine the customer have been become more sensitive to the
market. Making a unique design will be highly appreciated in the customer , however not with
the high price. In order to fulfill the demand, the manager should consider the price of the
market first and then downforward to the cost . Considering the market price first can be much
more helpful for TOP Co to compete within the competition pressure. After seeking by the
local market, then can be more expaned to the international market where the price will be
much different compared with the local price.
Selecting the labor can also be the other alternatives to the TOP Co. In fact , the scrap
and reworks are also done by the staff where the company charged the cost of scrap to the staff.
Meanwhile , TOP Co has the quality control staff and grader staff (checking the quality of
woods). In these case, it would be better if TOP Co combined both of them due to the similar
responsibility to check the quality of the wood. There are a lot of number of labors do the
similar things , that can waste of duty. By combining the labor, TOP Co can reduce the Direct
Labor cost to that the product cost can be reduced.
MIND MAP