Sie sind auf Seite 1von 2

European Journal of

Eur J Clin Pharmacol (1982) 22:359-365


Clinical Pharmacology
© Springer-Verlag 1982

Pharmacokinetics of Chlorpheniramine After Intravenous


and Oral Administration in Normal Adults
S. M. Huang, 1N. K. Athanikar, 1K. Sridhar, 2Y.C. Huang 1, and W. L. Chiou 1
IDepartment of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois, Medical Center, and
2Cook County Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA

Summary. Plasma and urinary levels of chlorphenir- ological allergies, its pharmacokinetics and pharma-
amine (CPM) and its 2 demethylated metabolites codynamics in normal subjects or patients appear not
were measured by HPLC after i. v. and oral dosing. In to have been fully evaluated.
5 mg (maleate) i.v. bolus studies in 2 subjects, plasma Reported pharmacokinetic parameters from dif-
CPM levels were fitted to triexponential equations ferent studies varied considerably. For example, aver-
with terminal half-lives (t,/2) of 23 and 22 h and area of age peak plasma levels after a 4 mg oral dose were 255
3.6 and 3.21/kg, respectively. Intravenous data pre- (Lange et al. 1968), 213 (Hanna and Tang 1974) and
dicted hepatic blood extraction ratios for the 2 sub- 5.5 ng/ml (Barhart and Johnson 1977). The volumes
jects to be 0.06 and 0.07, respectively. Absolute bio- of distribution (Vd area) have been reported to be 0.56
availability from oral solution (10 mg) was 59 and (Thompson and Leffert 1980) and 2.51/kg (Peets et al.
34%, and from tablets (8 mg) 44 and 25%, respectively, 1972) after i.v. dosing and 11.7 (Sanders et al. 1980)
indicating extensive gut first-pass metabolism. Mean and 7.65 1/kg (Yacobi et al. 1980) (not corrected for
t,/2 from 7 oral fasting studies in 5 subjects was 28 h absorption) after oral dosing. To date, it appears that
(19-43 h). Mean absorption lag time was 0.7 h its absolute bioavailability after oral administration in
(0.4-1.3 h), and mean peak time was 2.8 h (2-4 h). In humans has not been reported.
2 subjects, 6 mg solutions were given every 12 h for The reported long plasma half-lives (t,/2) ranging
9 doses; good correlation between single and multiple from 12 to 36.3 h (Barhart and Johnson 1977; Haefel-
dose kinetics was found. Significant accumulation finger 1976; Peers et al. 1972; Sanders et al. 1980;
was demonstrated in simulation studies with frequent Thompson and Leffert 1980; Yacobi et al. 1980) ap-
daily dosing. Estimated accumulation ratios vary pear not to be in accord with the current practice that
from 4.1 to 9.4 (mean 6.5). The tv, from urinary data regular dosage forms of CPM be administered 3-4
(collected for 12 days) was consistent with plasma da- times a day (US Pharmacopeia 1975) or with the con-
ta. The above results suggest the need to reexamine tention that sustained or controlled release dosage
the current practice of frequent daily dosing and the forms are needed for this drug.
use of sustained or controlled release dosage forms of It was stated that CPM was readily absorbed oral-
this drug. The possible cause of reduced plasma clear- ly with an onset of action in 15 rain, peak effect in i h
ance of CPM in renal patients is discussed. and a duration of action for 3-6 h, (Grollman 1962).
However, no convincing data seem available to sup-
Key words: chlorpheniramine; pharmacokinetics, port the above statement. On the contrary, the phar-
oral absorption, half-life, bioavailability, volume of macological effect using the skin test was shown to
distribution last up to several days after the end of multiple dosing
(Cook et al. 1973). Another interesting question is that
why there is a 20-fold (2-40 mg) difference in the daily
Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies are dose recommended for adults (US pharmacopeia
important to the development of rational drug ther- 1975). The above review indicates a need to critically
apy. Although chlorpheniramine (CPM) has been reexamine the pharmacokinetics and pharmacody-
widely used as an antihistamine for more than 3 de- namics of this drug in order to develop a more ration-
cades in treating or preventing respiratory or dermat- al dosage regimen.

0031-6970/82/0022/0359/$01.40
360 S. M. Huang et al.: Pharmacokinetics of Chlorpheniramine

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the phar- samples were collected prior to drug administration
macokinetics of CPM in normal adults after i.v. and as a control and at 12 h intervals thereafter until 8 days
oral administration using a specific and sensitive after the last dose.
high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC)
assay developed earlier from this laboratory (Athani-
Plasma-Blood Cell Partition Study
kar et al. 1979), and to discuss its potential clinical sig-
nificance. Three ml of heparinized freshly withdrawn blood
(from subjects A, B, D and E) spiked with stock solu-
tions to obtain blood concentrations of 10, 20, 50 and
Methods 100 ng/ml of CPM were incubated at 37 °C and 114
oscillations/rain for 10 min (which was predeter-
mined to be sufficient for equilibration). After centri-
Subjects
fugation, plasma was separated and kept frozen until
Five healthy volunteers (A-E), (1 female and 4 males), analyzed.
age 274-40 years, body weight 46-72 kg, with no histo-
ry of liver and renal diseases took part in this study.
HPLC assay
CPM and its two demethylated metabolites, des-
In tra venous Study
methyl CPM (DCPM) and didesmethyl CPM
Only subjects A and B were studied. Each received (DDCPM) in plasma and urine were analyzed by the
5 mg of CPM maleate (Chlortrimeton® injection, HPLC method (Athanikar et al. 1979).
Schering Corporation, Keniworth, NJ 07033, USA)
as a bolus dose. Blood samples were collected from Data Analysis
the antecubital vein into heparinized tubes prior to
administration and at 2.5, 5, 10, 20, 30, 45, 60, 90 min The plasma level-time curves were fitted into poly-
and 2, 4, 6,12, 24, 36 and 48 h after dosing. Urine sam- exponential equations using N O N L I N program
ples were collected at 2 h intervals up to 12 h and at (Metzler et al. 1974) with the number of exponents
12 h intervals thereafter until 84 h. Plasma and aliquot decided by the MAICE method (Yamaoka et al.
of urine samples were kept frozen until analyzed. 1978). The model-independent pharmacokinefic
Urine pH was measured shortly after sampling. parameters were calculated by standard methods
(Athanikar and Chiou 1979; Breimer et al. 1975;
Chiou 1978; Gibaldi and Perrier 1975; Wagner 1976).
Single Oral Study
Oral absorption from solution and tablets was eval-
uated. Ten milligrams of CPM maleate (Schering Results
Corp) dissolved in water (10 ml) was given to subjects
A and B and two 4 mg tablets of CPM maleate (Phil- Intravenous Study
lips Roxane Lab Inc, Columbus, OH 43216, USA)
were given to subjects A-E. The oral doses were ad- The plasma level-time curves obtained after i.v. injec-
ministerd with 200 ml of water after overnight fasting. tion to subjects A and B were best described by tri-
Food was withheld for 3 4 h after dosing. Blood sam- exponential equations (Fig. 1) as judged by MAICE
ples were collected prior to drug administration and method (Yamaoka et al. 1978). The values of the in-
at about 30, 45, 60, 90 min and 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 36 itial volume of distribution (Vo), Vd area, Vdss, total
and 48 h after dosing. Urine samples were collected plasma clearance (TBC) and the terminal tv2 and
from subjects D and E. other model-independent pharmacokinetic parame-
ters are summarized in Table 1. The average blood to
plasma ratio (,~bp) was 1.20 (SD 0.13, n = 13). The ra-
Multiple Oral Study tio was independent of blood concentrations from 20
Six milligrams of CPM maleate dissolved in water to 167 ng/ml. Using this ratio, the area under the
(6 ml) were administered to subjects D and E two curve based on plasma data, AUCp, was converted to
times a day (9 a.m. and 9 p.m.) for a total of 9 doses. that on blood data, AUCb (Table 1). The fraction of
Blood samples were collected prior to dosing and 3 h the oral dose absorbed predicted (Fpre) from the i.v.
after dosing for the first 3 doses and prior to dosing for studies (Table 1) were 0.94 and 0.93 for subjects A and
the 8th and 9th doses and at about 0.5,1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8,12, B, respectively. The plasma levels of DCPM and
24, 36, 48, 60, 72 and 96 h after the last dose. Urine DDCPM were not measurable after i.v. studies.

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen