Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
ELM-490
COURSE: _____________________________________________________ 2/11/2019
START DATE: ____________________________ 5/26/2019
END DATE: _____________________
Ohio
SCHOOL STATE: ___________________________________
Barb Ressler
COOPERATING TEACHER/MENTOR NAME: _______________________________________________________________________________________________
Bruce Thomas
GCU FACULTY SUPERVISOR NAME: ______________________________________________________________________________________________________
138.99 92.66
****Please note: a separate score addendum will be issued to the Teacher Candidate within 24 business hours of submitting
this evaluation that will display the total points and percentage. The Teacher Candidate must submit both the Clinical Practice
Evaluation #4 and the score addendum to Student Teaching course.****
50 5000 4633
150
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 150 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
Fairness Score
Teacher candidates should promote social justice and equity, maintain appropriate standards of confidentiality, and exercise fairness in all areas
including assessment. 92
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide
suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Sydney promotes fairness appropriate for kindergarten students and their ability to understand the concept of "fair"
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
Reflection Score
Teacher candidates should recognize that reflection combined with experience leads to growth as a professional. Educators should be thoughtful about
their professional practice, critically examine it, and seek continual improvement.
90
Evidence
((The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide
suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Sydney self-reflects daily on her professional being. She examines her behaviors through reflection and adjusts accordingly.
Curiosity Score
Teacher candidates should promote and support curiosity and encourage active inquiry.
94
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide
suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
This is a strength for Sydney. Her planning and lesson delivery promotes curiosity and active inquiry
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
Honesty Score
Teacher candidates should model integrity by their words and actions.
94
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide
suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Sydney is honest and models behaviors associated with high integrity
Compassion Score
Teacher candidates should demonstrate professional friendliness, warmth, and genuine caring in their relationships with others while providing
intellectual, emotional, and spiritual support.
92
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide
suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Sydney demonstrates professional friendliness, warmth and caring for her students, colleagues, and others
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
Advocacy Score
Teacher candidates understand the impact of community involvement and servant leadership as it applies to the welfare of others in the educational
setting.
94
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide
suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Sydney is a strong advocate for her students and her profession. She is definitely focused on the well being of others
Dedication Score
Teacher candidates should be committed to the profession of teaching and learning.
94
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide
suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Highly dedicated to the professional of teaching and learning
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
NASD 3a Score
Ability to teach dance at various levels to different age groups and in a variety of classroom, studio, and ensemble settings in ways that develop knowledge
of how dance works syntactically as a communication medium and developmentally as an agent of civilization. This set of abilities includes effective
classroom, studio, and rehearsal management.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
NASD 3b Score
An understanding of child growth and development and an understanding of principles of learning as they relate to dance.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
NASD 3c Score
The ability to assess aptitudes, experiential backgrounds, orientations of individuals and groups of students, and the nature of subject matter, and to plan
educational programs to meet assessed needs.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
NASD 3d Score
Knowledge of current methods, materials, and repertories available in various fields and levels of dance education appropriate to the teaching
specialization.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
NASD 3e Score
The ability to accept, amend, or reject methods and materials based on personal assessment of specific teaching situations.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
NASD 3f Score
Basic understanding of the principles and methods of developing curricula and the short- and long-term units that comprise them.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
NASD 3g Score
An understanding of evaluative techniques and ability to apply them in assessing both the progress of students in dance and the objectives and
procedures of the curriculum.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
NASD 5a Score
Students should engage in observation and discussion of field-based teaching/learning experiences in diverse settings.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
NASD 5b Score
Students should be provided opportunities for various types of teaching and directed observation throughout the degree program.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
NASD 5c Score
Teaching opportunities should be provided in actual pre-kindergarten, kindergarten, elementary, middle, and secondary settings, as appropriate for the
student’s certification level.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
NASD 5d Score
The choice of practice teaching sites must enable students to develop competencies consistent with standards outlined above, and must be approved by
qualified dance personnel from the degree-granting institution.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
NASD 5e Score
Sites and situations for student teaching and students must be supervised by qualified dance personnel from the degree-granting institution and, when
possible, the cooperating schools.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
Early Childhood Placements: National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC) Scoring Guide
No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished
(Teacher Candidates within (Teacher Candidates within (Teacher Candidates within (Target level for Teacher (Usually reserved for master
this range require a this range require a this range may benefit from a Candidates) Teacher Candidates)
Professional Growth Plan) Professional Growth Plan) Professional Growth Plan)
0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100
There is no evidence that The performance of the The performance of the The performance of the The performance of the The performance of the
the performance of the Teacher Candidate is Teacher Candidate is Teacher Candidate is Teacher Candidate meets Teacher Candidate
Teacher Candidate met this insufficient in meeting this underdeveloped in meeting developing in meeting this this standard and consistently exceeds this
standard or expectations standard and expectations this standard and standard and expectations expectations for a Teacher standard and all
for a Teacher Candidate for a Teacher Candidate expectations for a Teacher for a Teacher Candidate Candidate during student expectations for a Teacher
during student teaching. during student teaching. Candidate during student during student teaching. teaching. Candidate during student
teaching. teaching.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
Early Childhood Placements: National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC) Scoring Guide
No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished
0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100
NAEYC Standard 3: Observing, Documenting, and Assessing to Support Young Children and Families Score
Students prepared in early childhood degree programs understand that child observations, documentation, and other forms of assessment are central to the practice of all early
childhood professionals. They know about and understand the goals, benefits, and uses of assessment. They know about and use systematic observations, documentation, and
other effective assessment strategies in a responsible way, in partnership with families and other professionals, to positively influence the development of every child.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
NAEYC Standard 4: Using Developmentally Effective Approaches to Connect with Children and Families Score
Students prepared in early childhood degree programs understand that teaching and learning with young children is a complex enterprise, and its details vary depending on
children’s ages, characteristics, and the settings within which teaching and learning occur. They understand and use positive relationships and supportive interactions as the
foundation for their work with young children and families. Students know, understand, and use a wide array of developmentally appropriate approaches, instructional
strategies, and tools to connect with children and families and positively influence each child’s development and learning.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
Early Childhood Placements: National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC) Scoring Guide
No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished
0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
Special Education Placements: Council for Exceptional Children (CEC) Scoring Guide
No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished
(Teacher Candidates within (Teacher Candidates within (Teacher Candidates within (Target level for Teacher (Usually reserved for master
this range require a this range require a this range may benefit from a Candidates) Teacher Candidates)
Professional Growth Plan) Professional Growth Plan) Professional Growth Plan)
0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100
There is no evidence that The performance of the The performance of the The performance of the The performance of the The performance of the
the performance of the Teacher Candidate is Teacher Candidate is Teacher Candidate is Teacher Candidate meets Teacher Candidate
Teacher Candidate met this insufficient in meeting this underdeveloped in meeting developing in meeting this this standard and consistently exceeds this
standard or expectations standard and expectations this standard and standard and expectations expectations for a Teacher standard and all
for a Teacher Candidate for a Teacher Candidate expectations for a Teacher for a Teacher Candidate Candidate during student expectations for a Teacher
during student teaching. during student teaching. Candidate during student during student teaching. teaching. Candidate during student
teaching. teaching.
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
Special Education Placements: Council for Exceptional Children (CEC) Scoring Guide
No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished
0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
Special Education Placements: Council for Exceptional Children (CEC) Scoring Guide
No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished
0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
Elementary Placements: Association for Childhood Education International (ACEI) Scoring Guide
No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished
(Teacher Candidates within (Teacher Candidates within (Teacher Candidates within (Target level for Teacher (Usually reserved for master
this range require a this range require a this range may benefit from a Candidates) Teacher Candidates)
Professional Growth Plan) Professional Growth Plan) Professional Growth Plan)
0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100
There is no evidence that The performance of the The performance of the The performance of the The performance of the The performance of the
the performance of the Teacher Candidate is Teacher Candidate is Teacher Candidate is Teacher Candidate meets Teacher Candidate
Teacher Candidate met this insufficient in meeting this underdeveloped in meeting developing in meeting this this standard and consistently exceeds this
standard or expectations standard and expectations this standard and standard and expectations expectations for a Teacher standard and all
for a Teacher Candidate for a Teacher Candidate expectations for a Teacher for a Teacher Candidate Candidate during student expectations for a Teacher
during student teaching. during student teaching. Candidate during student during student teaching. teaching. Candidate during student
teaching. teaching.
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
Elementary Placements: Association for Childhood Education International (ACEI) Scoring Guide
No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished
0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
Elementary Placements: Association for Childhood Education International (ACEI) Scoring Guide
No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished
0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
Elementary Placements: Association for Childhood Education International (ACEI) Scoring Guide
No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished
0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100
ACEI Standard 3.1: Integrating and Applying Knowledge for Instruction Score
Candidates plan and implement instruction based on knowledge of students, learning theory, connections across the curriculum, curricular goals, and
community
93
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Sydnecy's plannign is exceptional and based on the students prior knowledge and the skill sets for learning they possess
ACEI Standard 3.3: Development of Critical Thinking and Problem Solving Score
Candidates understand and use a variety of teaching strategies that encourage elementary students’ development of critical thinking and problem solving.
91
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Sydney uses a variety of teaching strategies to reach all students
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
Elementary Placements: Association for Childhood Education International (ACEI) Scoring Guide
No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished
0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100
Sydney has strong classroom management skills and engages her students in a meaningful way
Sydney has very good assessment related skills. She utilized them appropriately in her kindergarten classroom
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
Elementary Placements: Association for Childhood Education International (ACEI) Scoring Guide
No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished
0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100
Sydney is current in her review of the literature. She reflects on her own teaching and strives for "best practice'.
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
Elementary ESL: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL) Scoring Guide
No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished
(Teacher Candidates within (Teacher Candidates within (Teacher Candidates within (Target level for Teacher (Usually reserved for master
this range require a this range require a this range may benefit from a Candidates) Teacher Candidates)
Professional Growth Plan) Professional Growth Plan) Professional Growth Plan)
0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100
There is no evidence that The performance of the The performance of the The performance of the The performance of the The performance of the
the performance of the Teacher Candidate is Teacher Candidate is Teacher Candidate is Teacher Candidate meets Teacher Candidate
Teacher Candidate met this insufficient in meeting this underdeveloped in meeting developing in meeting this this standard and consistently exceeds this
standard or expectations standard and expectations this standard and standard and expectations expectations for a Teacher standard and all
for a Teacher Candidate for a Teacher Candidate expectations for a Teacher for a Teacher Candidate Candidate during student expectations for a Teacher
during student teaching. during student teaching. Candidate during student during student teaching. teaching. Candidate during student
teaching. teaching.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
Elementary ESL: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL) Scoring Guide
No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished
0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Standard 3.a. Planning for Standards-Based ESL and Content Instruction Score
Candidates know, understand, and apply concepts, research, and best practices to plan classroom instruction in a supportive learning environment for
ELLs. They plan for multilevel classrooms with learners from diverse backgrounds using standards-based ESL and content curriculum.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Standard 3.b. Implementing and Managing Standards-Based ESL and Content Instruction Score
Candidates know, manage, and implement a variety of standards-based teaching strategies and techniques for developing and integrating English
listening, speaking, reading, and writing. Candidates support ELLs access to the core curriculum by teaching language through academic content.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
Elementary ESL: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL) Scoring Guide
No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished
0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100
Standard 3.c. Using Resources and Technology Effectively in ESL and Content Instruction Score
Candidates are familiar with a wide range of standards-based materials, resources, and technologies, and choose, adapt, and use them in effective ESL and
content teaching.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
Elementary ESL: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL) Scoring Guide
No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished
0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
Music Placements: National Association of Schools of Music (NASM) Scoring Guide
No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished
0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
1.6 Prospective business teachers move beyond the boundaries of the classroom to assume responsibility as an advocate and promoter of the profession
in the community, state, and nation.
1.7 Prospective business teachers projects a positive professional image that personifies the discipline itself and exemplifies the goals and ideals of the
profession.
1.8 Prospective business teachers base all interaction on principles of respect, fairness, and ethics.
1.9 Prospective business teachers articulates the importance of professional standards in program development.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide
suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
2.2 Prospective business teachers create curriculum that reflect local, state, and national standards.
2.3 Prospective business teachers create curriculum that consists of achievement standards, performance expectations, and assessment.
2.4 Prospective business teachers create curriculum that consists of sequential integrated learning experiences.
2.5 Prospective business teachers create curriculum that provides for delivery of content in a developmentally appropriate manner.
2.6 Prospective business teachers create curriculum that includes the development of knowledge, skills and attitudes.
2.7 Prospective business teachers create curriculum that encourages students to use reflective thinking, problem solving, and other higher level thinking
skills.
2.8 Prospective business teachers create curriculum that includes multidisciplinary approaches.
2.9 Prospective business teachers create curriculum that serves the needs of diverse populations.
2.10 Prospective business teachers create curriculum that enables students to make a transition from school to career.
2.11 Prospective business teachers create curriculum that focuses on continuous quality education.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide
suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
3.2 Prospective business teachers employ a variety of instructional strategies to engage all students in the learning process.
3.3 Prospective business teachers facilitate collaborative learning that may include students, teachers, business and community representatives, and
others.
3.4 Prospective business teachers demonstrate effective communication skills to facilitate learning.
3.5 Prospective business teachers help all students realize their full potential.
3.6 Prospective business teachers use a variety of media to enhance and expand learning opportunities.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide
suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
4.2 Prospective business teachers use multiple forms of assessment to obtain accurate measures of student progress including formal, informal and
authentic measures.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide
suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide
suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
6.2 Prospective business teachers recognize that the student organization provides opportunities to involve the business and professional community in
support of the goals of the business education program.
6.3 Prospective business teachers recognize that the student-directed operation of the organization provides opportunities for personal growth and
leadership development.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide
suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
Standard 7: Score
7.1 Prospective business teachers base all communication on principles of respect, fairness, and honesty, and understands that building relationships
depends on these foundations.
7.2 Prospective business teachers exhibit an understanding of communication as a dynamic system of people, processes, cultures, media, and fluid
boundaries in developing strategies.
7.3 Prospective business teachers demonstrate effective communication skills to facilitate learning.
7.4 Prospective business teachers incorporate quality standards in all forms of communication.
7.5 Prospective business teachers serve as an ambassador for business education with all stakeholders.
7.6 Prospective business teachers recognize that culture impacts business communication.
7.7 Prospective business teachers use a variety of media to enhance and expand communication opportunities.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide
suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
Business Placements: National Business Education Association (NBEA) Scoring Guide
No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished
0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100
Standard 8: Score
8.1 Prospective business teachers communicate effectively with all stakeholders by understanding communication as a dynamic system of people,
cultures, and media.
8.2 Prospective business teachers recognize that student achievement is a collaborative effort among a variety of stakeholders.
8.3 Prospective business teachers build professional relationships with stakeholders to create a learning environment in which students move
continuously and easily between school and community to facilitate the learning process.
8.4 Prospective business teachers develop partnerships with members of the educational, business and other communities to improve programs, develop
new programs, provide student access to learning to learning opportunities, and ensure a curriculum based on real world experiences.
8.5 Prospective business teachers build professional relationships with all stakeholders based on trust, respect, ethical standards, and mutual benefits to
earn commitment, dedicated involvement, visible advocacy, and financial support.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide
suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Standard 9: Score
9.1 Prospective business teachers assist students in adjusting to and functioning effectively in educational and business environments.
9.2 Prospective business teachers help students discover their potential for intellectual, personal, social and emotional growth.
9.3 Prospective business teachers help students make decisions regarding careers and career transitions.
9.4 Prospective business teachers collaborate with student support services when appropriate.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide
suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
10.3 Prospective business teachers demonstrate the knowledge and skills in educational foundations, teaching-learning theory, learning styles,
exceptionalities, instructional strategies, assessment techniques, and field experiences to effectively teach business education.
10.4 Prospective business teachers gain real life experience in the application of business knowledge and skills.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide
suggestions for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
NCTE Standard 1: English Language Arts (ELA) Candidate Program Structure Score
Candidates follow a specific curriculum and are expected to meet appropriate performance assessments for preservice
English language arts teachers.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
History Placements: National Council for the Social Studies (NCSS) Scoring Guide
No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished
(Teacher Candidates within (Teacher Candidates within (Teacher Candidates within (Target level for Teacher (Usually reserved for master
this range require a this range require a this range may benefit from a Candidates) Teacher Candidates)
Professional Growth Plan) Professional Growth Plan) Professional Growth Plan)
0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100
There is no evidence that The performance of the The performance of the The performance of the The performance of the The performance of the
the performance of the Teacher Candidate is Teacher Candidate is Teacher Candidate is Teacher Candidate meets Teacher Candidate
Teacher Candidate met this insufficient in meeting this underdeveloped in meeting developing in meeting this this standard and consistently exceeds this
standard or expectations standard and expectations this standard and standard and expectations expectations for a Teacher standard and all
for a Teacher Candidate for a Teacher Candidate expectations for a Teacher for a Teacher Candidate Candidate during student expectations for a Teacher
during student teaching. during student teaching. Candidate during student during student teaching. teaching. Candidate during student
teaching. teaching.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
History Placements: National Council for the Social Studies (NCSS) Scoring Guide
No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished
0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
History Placements: National Council for the Social Studies (NCSS) Scoring Guide
No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished
0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
History Placements: National Council for the Social Studies (NCSS) Scoring Guide
No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished
0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
Math Placements: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) Scoring Guide
No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished
0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
NCTM Standard 14: Knowledge of Data Analysis, Statistics, and Probability Score
Candidates demonstrate an understanding of concepts and practices related to data analysis, statistics, and probability.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
Physical Education Placements: Society of Health and Physical Educators (SHAPE) Scoring Guide
No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished
(Teacher Candidates within (Teacher Candidates within (Teacher Candidates within (Target level for Teacher (Usually reserved for master
this range require a this range require a this range may benefit from a Candidates) Teacher Candidates)
Professional Growth Plan) Professional Growth Plan) Professional Growth Plan)
0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100
There is no evidence that The performance of the The performance of the The performance of the The performance of the The performance of the
the performance of the Teacher Candidate is Teacher Candidate is Teacher Candidate is Teacher Candidate meets Teacher Candidate
Teacher Candidate met this insufficient in meeting this underdeveloped in meeting developing in meeting this this standard and consistently exceeds this
standard or expectations standard and expectations this standard and standard and expectations expectations for a Teacher standard and all
for a Teacher Candidate for a Teacher Candidate expectations for a Teacher for a Teacher Candidate Candidate during student expectations for a Teacher
during student teaching. during student teaching. Candidate during student during student teaching. teaching. Candidate during student
teaching. teaching.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
Physical Education Placements: Society of Health and Physical Educators (SHAPE) Scoring Guide
No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished
0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
Science Placements: National Science Teachers Association (NSTA) Scoring Guide
No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished
0 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 4
Sydney Wenger
TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ 20522447
STUDENT NUMBER____________________
INSTRUCTIONS
Please review the "Total Scored Percentage" for accuracy and add any attachments before completing the "Agreement and Signature" section.
Attachment 2:
(Optional)
I attest this submission is accurate, true, and in compliance with GCU policy guidelines, to the best of my ability to do so.
SCORING SUMMARY
GCU Professional Dispositions of Learners InTASC Standards Specialized Professional Association Standards
Score Score Score
Phonemic Awareness – Introduce long o sound. Say three words and ask
students to identify the two words that have the same o sound. Mention that the
o says its name here.
Phonics – Introduce the o_e pattern for the long o sound. Say words with this
pattern (note, goat, boat). Mention that some words have this long o sound, but
do not have the sneaky e at the end (go, no, so). Sing, “A Goat in a Boat.” Have
students listen for the long o sound in words.
Handwriting – Write (I ate a cone at the fun zone.) (Can we go to vote?) (coat,
bone, dome). Have students underline the o_e pattern in their sentences.
High Frequency Words – Introduce where and look. (Where do we look?) (You
can help me look here.) (Where can we play?) Have students read sentences
with the new words in them.
11:00-11:30
Technology Library Art Gym Music
11:35-12:05 Music Art Gym Music Art
12:05-12:30 Reading Groups:
M ****Right to Read Week
Students will read to self. They will complete their goals sheet. Their goal is to
read to self 4 of the 5 days. If they do so, they can color in a cowboy boot on
their goal sheet at the end of each day. At the end of the week is goal is met,
students will receive a cowboy prize.
12:35-1:20 Lunch and Recess
1:20-1:30 Meet students in the hall, read from chapter book on easel or a picture book of
your choice.
1:30-2:00 Math:
M 5 D 18 – Use page 6 worksheet with 100 dots. Count circles on paper by
counting 10 then write 10, then continue writing zero the hero numbers to 100.
Find 6 tens and one more = 6 ten 1 = 61. Continue finding other numbers.
“Find 60!” “Count how many 10’s there are in 60. What if we moved one
more?” “There are 6, six ten, one is 61!” “I know this row is 10, what is 10 and
one more?”
High Frequency Words – review the words ‘where and look’. The students will
create sentences with their partners.
Shared Reading – Read “Look! A Home”. Focus on predicting, comprehension
and fluency.
11:00-11:30
Technology Library Art Gym Music
11:35-12:05 Music Art Gym Music Art
12:05-12:30 Reading Groups:
Tues ****Right to Read Week
Students will read to self. They will complete their goals sheet. Their goal is to
read to self 4 of the 5 days. If they do so, they can color in a cowboy boot on
their goal sheet at the end of each day. At the end of the week is goal is met,
students will receive a cowboy prize.
12:35-1:20 Lunch and Recess
1:20-1:30 Meet students in the hall, read from chapter book on easel or a picture book of
your choice.
1:30-2:00 Math:
Tues 5 D 19 – Do whole group review of the dot paper from yesterday on the
smartboard. Review a few examples with them. Then complete the homework
paper together. Homework is write the number you see and then write what the
new number would be with one more.
3:05-3:15 Prepare for home – get orange folder and all papers, graph behavior (write in
box if not on green), get backpack, lunch, and coat and bring to seat. Take
folder home.
3:15-3:25 Go home
Tues
Oral Vocabulary Cards – Review natural resources and create. Introduce the
words design, weave and knowledge and do the activities on the back of their
cards.
Listening Comprehension - Read the picture card ‘Spider Woman Teaches the
Navajo’. Introduce it as a ‘tale’ and ask the comprehension questions on the
back of the fourth card.
Phonemic Awareness – Phoneme Blending: the students will hear the sounds of
a word and they have to blend them to make the word.
Phonics – Review long o sound. The students will review words with sneaky e
words. Then they will blend words with long o. The students will sort pictures
cards with short o and long o.
High Frequency Words – Review the words ‘where and look’. Complete the
worksheet story ‘Look at This!’
11:00-11:30
Technology Library Art Gym Music
11:35-12:05 Music Art Gym Music Art
12:05-12:30 Reading Groups:
W ****Right to Read Week
Students will read to self. They will complete their goals sheet. Their goal is to
read to self 4 of the 5 days. If they do so, they can color in a cowboy boot on
their goal sheet at the end of each day. At the end of the week is goal is met,
students will receive a cowboy prize.
12:35-1:20 Lunch and Recess
1:20-1:30 Meet students in the hall, read from chapter book on easel or a picture book of
your choice.
1:30-2:00 Math:
W 5 E 20 – smart board blank number bond teacher led teen numbers students can
write on white boards 15= 10+5 or 10 + 5 =15.
There is a number bond on the board. The teacher will say a teen number and
ask them to help her fill in the number bond. Students will write the number
sentence both ways.
No paper, follow lesson.
2:00-2:20 Bulldog Math Tub Time:
W Center 1: LRC (with Julie)
Center 2: Go Fish
Center 3: Fly Facts from Barb
Center 4: Counting Collections
2:20-2:35 Recess
2:35-3:05 Science/Social Studies Center
W Activity:
***Junior Achievement
3:05-3:15 Prepare for home – get orange folder and all papers, graph behavior (write in
box if not on green), get backpack, lunch, and coat and bring to seat. Take
folder home.
3:15-3:25 Go home
W
Phonics – Blend words with long o. Write hole, pole, mole and have students
sound out the word. Have them also underline which letters are the same in
each word and mention that they rhyme.
High Frequency Words – Make sentences with new words look and where.
(Where did you go?) (Look at me.) (Where do we play?) (Where can we look?)
Shared Reading – Read, “Look! A Home!” Focus on comprehension, fluency,
and expression. Pull sticks and have students help you read. Notice the o_e
words in the story.
11:00-11:30
Technology Library Art Gym Music
11:35-12:05 Music Art Gym Music Art
12:05-12:30 Reading Groups:
Thur ****Right to Read Week
Students will read to self. They will complete their goals sheet. Their goal is to
read to self 4 of the 5 days. If they do so, they can color in a cowboy boot on
their goal sheet at the end of each day. At the end of the week is goal is met,
students will receive a cowboy prize.
12:35-1:20 Lunch and Recess
1:20-1:30 Meet students in the hall, read from chapter book on easel or a picture book of
Thur your choice.
1:30-2:00 Math:
Thur No Math today because of Field Trip.
2:00-2:20 Bulldog Math Tub Time:
Thur Center 1: LRC (with Julie)
Center 2: Go Fish
Center 3: Fly Facts from Barb
Center 4: Counting Collections
2:20-2:35 Recess
2:35-3:05 Science/Social Studies Centers
Thur Activity:
Binocular project. Students will each take 2 toilet paper rolls. Students will get
piece of construction paper that they will get to draw and design for their
binoculars. They will put glue on backside of construction paper and glue it
around their 2 toilet paper rolls.
Students will have teacher hole punch a hole on each toilet paper roll at the top.
They will then get a piece of string and attach to the binoculars though the hole.
3:05-3:15 Prepare for home – get orange folder and all papers, graph behavior (write in
Thur box if not on green), get backpack, lunch, and coat and bring to seat. Take
folder home.
3:15-3:25 Go home
Thur
Phonemic Awareness – Phoneme Substitution: Say rose and change the /z/ to a
/p/ to get rope.
Phonics – Read words with long o and consonants. Write words cove, note, so,
home, role, no, joke, go for students to read. Write sentences with long o as
well. (No, it is not a joke.) (We can go to the cove.) (What is my time zone?)
Dictate words for students to write with long o. (nose, go, lone, mole..).
High Frequency Words – Work on sentences with where and look. (Where did
you look?) (Look at the sunset.) (Watch where you walk.)
11:00-11:30
Technology Library Art PE Music
11:35-12:05 Music Art PE Music Art
12:05-12:30 Reading Groups:
F ****Right to Read Week
Students will read to self. They will complete their goals sheet. Their goal is to
read to self 4 of the 5 days. If they do so, they can color in a cowboy boot on
their goal sheet at the end of each day. At the end of the week is goal is met,
students will receive a cowboy prize.
12:35-1:20 Lunch and Recess
1:20-1:30 Meet students in the hall, read from chapter book on easel or a picture book of
F your choice.
1:30-2:05 Math
F 5 E 21 – Students will be working in partners. Each group will have 20 cubes
(2 ten sticks) and a number bond. One student will close their eyes while the
other student makes a teen number and puts it in the whole or parts. The other
partner opens their eyes and has to complete the number bond by writing the
correct numbers that are missing. They will also write the number sentence.
Students will get a sheet of paper to draw their material on. This will be placed
at the top of the construction paper.
Students will get a lined piece of paper to write on.
This is (wool).
(Wool) comes from sheep.
It is used for (hats).
When finished this will be glued below their picture of their material on the
construction paper.
Students will get another piece of paper to draw what they made their material
into. This will be glued below their writing portion on the construction paper.
3:05-3:15 Prepare for home – get orange folder and all papers, graph behavior (write in
F box if not on green), get backpack, lunch, and coat and bring to seat. Take
folder home.
3:15-3:25 Go home
F
Lesson Target
L.K.1f Produce and expand complete sentences in shared language activities. [8 lessons]
L.K.2 Demonstrate command of the conventions of standard English capitalization, punctuation, and spelling when
writing. [1 lesson]
L.K.2c Write a letter or letters for most consonant and short-vowel sounds (phonemes). [1 lesson]
L.K.2d Spell simple words phonetically, drawing on knowledge of sound-letter relationships. [1 lesson]
L.K.5 With guidance and support from adults, explore word relationships and nuances in word meanings. [1
lesson]
L.K.5a Sort common objects into categories (e.g., shapes, foods) to gain a sense of the concepts the categories
represent. [1 lesson]
L.K.5c Identify real-life connections between words and their use (e.g., note places at school that are colorful). [4
lessons]
L.K.6 Use words and phrases acquired through conversations, reading and being read to, and responding to
texts. [2 lessons]
RF.K.2 Demonstrate understanding of spoken words, syllables, and sounds (phonemes). [4 lessons]
RF.K.2b Count, pronounce, blend, and segment syllables in spoken words. [4 lessons]
RF.K.2d Isolate and pronounce the initial, medial vowel, and final sounds (phonemes) in three-phoneme
(consonant-vowel-consonant, or CVC) words. (This does not include CVCs ending with /l/, /r/, or /x/.) [5 lessons]
RF.K.2e Add or substitute individual sounds (phonemes) in simple, one-syllable words to make new words. [7
lessons]
RF.K.3 Know and apply grade-level phonics and word analysis skills in decoding words. [4 lessons]
RF.K.3b Associate the long and short sounds with common spellings (graphemes) for the five major vowels. [15
lessons]
RF.K.3c Read common high-frequency words by sight (e.g., the, of, to, you, she, my, is, are, do, does). [12
lessons]
RF.K.4 Read emergent-reader texts with purpose and understanding. [11 lessons]
RI.K.1 With prompting and support, ask and answer questions about key details in a text. [7 lessons]
RI.K.2 With prompting and support, identify the main topic and retell key details of a text. [1 lesson]
RI.K.3 With prompting and support, describe the connection between two individuals, events, ideas, or pieces of
information in a text. [4 lessons]
RI.K.6 Name the author and illustrator of a text and define the role of each in presenting the ideas or information in
a text. [1 lesson]
RI.K.7 With prompting and support, describe the relationship between illustrations and the text in which they
appear (e.g., what person, place, thing, or idea in the text an illustration depicts). [1 lesson]
RI.K.9 With prompting and support, identify basic similarities in and differences between two texts on the same
topic (e.g., in illustrations, descriptions, or procedures). [1 lesson]
RI.K.10 Actively engage in group reading activities with purpose and understanding. [1 lesson]
RL.K.1 With prompting and support, ask and answer questions about key details in a text. [2 lessons]
RL.K.6 With prompting and support, name the author and illustrator of a story and define the role of each in telling
the story. [1 lesson]
RL.K.10 Actively engage in group reading activities with purpose and understanding. [2 lessons]
SL.K.1 Participate in collaborative conversations with diverse partners about kindergarten topics and texts with
peers and adults in small and larger groups. [1 lesson]
SL.K.1a Follow agreed-upon rules for discussions (e.g., listening to others and taking turns speaking about the
topics and texts under discussion). [1 lesson]
SL.K.2 Confirm understanding of a text read aloud or information presented orally or through other media by
asking and answering questions about key details and requesting clarification if something is not understood. [3
lessons]
SL.K.3 Ask and answer questions in order to seek help, get information, or clarify something that is not
understood. [1 lesson]
SL.K.5 Add drawings or other visual displays to descriptions as desired to provide additional detail. [2 lessons]
SL.K.6 Speak audibly and express thoughts, feelings, and ideas clearly. [4 lessons]
W.K.2 Use a combination of drawing, dictating, and writing to compose informative/explanatory texts in which they
name what they are writing about and supply some information about the topic. [3 lessons]
W.K.3 Use a combination of drawing, dictating, and writing to narrate a single event or several loosely linked
events, tell about the events in the order in which they occurred, and provide a reaction to what happened. [2
lessons]
W.K.5 With guidance and support from adults, respond to questions and suggestions from peers and add details
to strengthen writing as needed. [3 lessons]
W.K.6 With guidance and support from adults, explore a variety of digital tools to produce and publish writing,
including in collaboration with peers. [1 lesson]
W.K.7 Participate in shared research and writing projects (e.g., explore a number of books by a favorite author and
express opinions about them). [2 lessons]
W.K.8 With guidance and support from adults, recall information from experiences or gather information from
provided sources to answer a question. [2 lessons]
Arrived at 10:10.
Departed at 10:45