Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
& Ivanov
Take 70th
New England
Open
October-December 2010
$3.95
CHESS HORIZONS
• One half-point bye allowed in any round if requested with entry. Limit one bye.
• USCF and MACA or home state membership required. (MACA dues $12 adult,
$6 under 18; add $8 [optional] for a subscription to Chess Horizons)
Mail checks, payable to MACA, to: Ken Ballou, 27 Fenway Drive, Framingham, MA 01701-4012
2 WWW.MASSCHESS.ORG
CHESS HORIZONS
In This Issue
Letter From the President Chess
Horizons
Page 4
OCTOBER-DECEMBER 2010 3
CHESS HORIZONS
4 WWW.MASSCHESS.ORG
CHESS HORIZONS
— Max Euwe
6 WWW.MASSCHESS.ORG
CHESS HORIZONS
event saw him drop off the leader this move, which leaves all of White's White: Yasinovsky, David (1922)
board and into fourth place behind pawns weak, is simpler. 48.Kb5 Black:!Bela Kis, Lorand (2180)
Adam Piche who had been leading Nh5 49.Nd5 Kg7 50.Kxb6 Nf4 [C23] Bishop’s Opening
the event but lost to Frank in the last cuuuuuuuuC
round. Finally, the U1000 section 1.e4 e5 2.Bc4 c6 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.f4
{wdwdwdwd}
saw a three-way tie for first between d5 5.exd5 cxd5 6.Bb5+ Bd7 7.fxe5
Joseph Han, Benjamin Marinelli, and
{dwdwdpiw} Bxb5 Lorand miscalculates, and the
Richard A. Lunetta, who showed no
{wIwdwdwd} following series of exchanges leaves
mercy to each other in the early rounds {dwdNdP0w} me up a pawn. I don’t think he even
only to find themselves together in a {wdwdwhw0} looked at exf6 here, just Nxb5 after
group at the top of the table. {dwdwdwdP} which Ne4 gives Black some play
Alex Lenderman is rapidly {wdwdwdPd} for the pawn. 8.exf6 Bd7 9.Nxd5
becoming a world-class chess player, {dwdwdwdw} Nc6 10.Nf3 gxf6 11.0–0 Be6 12.Nf4
and he showcases his technique vllllllllV Bc5+ 13.Kh1 Qd7 14.Nh5 0–0–0
beautifully in this win over Canadian 51.Ne3 White has won the pawn 15.Nxf6 Qe7 16.Ne4 I'm up two pawns
GM Pascal Charbonneau: back, but this has cost him a lot of time now, but time pressure was looming
and his king is now too distanced. This and I began to see premonitions of a
White:!Charbonneau, Pascal is demonstrated best by the continua- dangerous attack on my king. 16...f5
Black: Lenderman, Alex tion should White have chosen to 17.Nxc5 Qxc5 18.d4 Qd6 19.Bg5
[B10] Caro-Kann exchange knights: 51.Nxf4 gxf4 52.Kc5 Rd7 20.b3 Rg8 By this point Lorand
Kf6 53.Kd5 Kxf5 54.Kd4 f3! 55.gxf3 and I both had about 15 minutes left,
1.e4 c6 2.c4 d5 3.cxd5 cxd5 Kf4 and with Black elbowing White's and I began to enter panic mode.
4.exd5 Nf6 5.Nc3 Nxd5 6.Nf3 Nxc3 king, the position is easily won. 51...Kf6 21.Qd2 Bd5 22.Bf4 Qg6 23.c3 Qh5
7.bxc3 g6 8.d4 Bg7 9.Bd3 0–0 10.0–0 52.Kc6 Ke5 53.Kd7 Ke4 54.Ke7 24.Rf2 Rdg7 25.Qe3
Nc6 11.Re1 b6 12.Bg5 Qd6 An Desperation, but attempting to keep cuuuuuuuuC
unusual move; typically Black plays the knight on the board loses all of {wdkdwdrd}
Re8 or Bb7 13.Be4 e6 14.d5 exd5 White's pawns: 54.Ng4 Kxf5 55.Ke7
{0pdwdw4p}
15.Bxd5 Qd7 16.Rc1 Re8 17.Rxe8+ Nxg2 56.Kxf7 Nf4 57.Nh6+ Ke5 58.Kg7
Qxe8 18.Qd2 Bb7 19.Re1 Qf8 20.Nd4 Nxh3 54...Kxe3 55.Kxf7 Kf2 56.Kf6
{wdndwdwd}
Na5 21.Be7 Qc8 22.Nb5 Bxd5 Kxg2 57.Kxg5 Kg3 Just in time to
{dwdbdpdq}
23.Qxd5 Qc6 24.c4 Bf8 25.Bxf8 save the last pawn and clinch the game. {wdw)wGwd}
Kxf8 26.Re4 Qxd5 27.cxd5 Rc8 58.f6 Ne6+ 59.Kf5 Nf8 60.Ke4? A {dP)w!Ndw}
White's endgame is slightly worse as slight miscalculation, but it was too {Pdwdw$P)}
he will have trouble holding on to his late to salvage a draw anyway. 60...Nh7 {$wdwdwdK}
d5 pawn 28.f3 a6 29.Nd4 Rc5 30.d6 And White resigned because Black vllllllllV
Rd5 31.Nc2 Nb7 Black could have forces the f-pawn off the board. 0–1 25...b6 Here Black had an
snatched the pawn here immediately opportunity to simplify into a drawn
with Rxd6, but this move forces the Although my tournament did not endgame which both Kis and I saw
a pawns off the board as well, thus go particularly well, it was highlight- but severely underestimated: 25...Rxg2
providing Black with a passed pawn. ed by four very interesting games. 26.Rxg2 Qxf3 27.Qxf3 Bxf3 28.Rag1
32.Nb4 Rd1+ 33.Kf2 Nxd6 34.Re1 Unfortunately, I lost three of them, b5 29.b4 Ne7 30.h3 Nd5 31.Bd2 Rg6
Rd4 35.Nxa6 Ra4 36.Nc7 Rxa2+ and pulled out a win only through a and although Black is down an
37.Re2 Ra5 38.Rd2 Nc4 39.Rc2 Ne5 blunder by my opponent late in the exchange and a pawn, White has to
40.f4 Ng4+ 41.Kf3 h5 42.h3 Ra3+ sixth hour of a very drawn position. simplify into a very drawish endgame.
43.Ke4 Nf6+ 44.Kd4 h4! A very The following game was the most 32.Kh2 Bxg2 33.Rxg2 Ra6 34.Be1
strong move which limit's White's exciting of the event for me, with f4 35.Kg1 h6 and Black's passed f-
ability to advance and protect his pawns. both time controls getting down to pawn compensates for him being
45.f5 Ra4+ 46.Rc4 Rxc4+ 47.Kxc4 the final seconds. If only the result down material. 26.c4 Be4 27.Ng5??
g5 gxf5 was also quite playable but had been different… Simple blindness. I had decided that
8 WWW.MASSCHESS.ORG
CHESS HORIZONS
cuuuuuuuuC
I had enough protectors on the piece. had about 30 seconds left plus delay {rhw4wdwi}
After Rg1, White would have been at this point) Lorand will make the
{0bdwdRgw}
well on his way to repelling Black's slightest error and let me snatch up
threats and gaining victory. 27...Rxg5 his pawn on some trick. 67.Rh8 Nb5
{w0pdwdPG}
28.Bxg5 Qxg5 29.Qxg5 Rxg5 68.Rb8 Bc4 69.Rd8+ Kc3 70.Rd1
{dwdwdwdw}
30.Rd1 Nb4 31.Kg1 Nd3 32.Rfd2 Kc2 71.Rh1 Nc3 72.h5 Ne2+ 73.Kg4 {wdB1Pdwd}
Nf4 33.g3 h5 34.Kf1 Nh3 35.Re1 I spent my final seconds on this move, {dwdwdwHw}
Rg7 36.d5 Ng5 37.Re3 Nf3 38.Rf2 but of course in reality it makes no {Pdw!wdP)}
Ne5 39.Rd2 Kd7 40.Rb2 Kd6 difference. 73...b2 74.h6 Bd3 75.Kf3 {dw$wdwIw}
cuuuuuuuuC Kc3 76.Ke3 Nc1 77.h7 Bxh7 78.Rxh7 vllllllllV
b1Q 79.Rc7+ In my delirium from It seems as though White must
{wdwdwdwd}
fatigue and constant time pressure, I trade queens, but he has a diabolical
{0wdwdw4w} trick up his sleeve. 20.Kh1!! The
{w0wiwdwd} allowed myself for a second to think
that I had forced Black's queen off the beauty of dropping a queen with such
{dwdPhpdp} an innocent and elegant move is
board. If only it had been a bishop on
{wdPdbdwd} c1 and not a knight... 79...Kb2 80.Rb7+ extraordinary. (Trading queens also
{dPdw$w)w} Nb3 And that's the end of that. 0–1 mates: 20.Qxd4 Rxd4 21.Bxg7+ Kg8
{P$wdwdw)} Sometimes analysis leads to the 22.Nh5 Rd1+ 23.Rf1+ Rd5 24.Rf8#)
{dwdwdKdw} discovery of fascinating variations. 20...Qxd2 21.Bxg7+ Kg8 22.Rcf1
vllllllllV When I looked through the following Rd5 23.Nf5 Rxf5 24.Re7+ Qd5
The time control has been game I saw an undeniably beautiful, 25.Rxf5 And with all his pieces tied
reached, but with my scrambling if totally unnecessary sacrifice, which down, Black is, once again, mated
towards the last five moves I have would have swept away a brilliancy by force: 25...Nd7 26.Rh5 Qf7
handed the advantage completely over prize had it been played on the board. 27.Rxf7 Nc5 28.Rh8# 19...Kxg7
to Black. However, I still have some 20.Nf5+ 1–0
resources in my position and the White: Duval, George (1600)
game stays very entertaining. 41.a3 Black: Twombley, John (1500) And so, with the final games
Kc5 42.Rd2 a5 43.Rc3 Rh7 44.h4 I [D06] Queen's Gambit Declined ended, the prize checks signed, the
figured this to be the lesser of two hotel bills reviewed, there was noth-
evils; should I let Black play h4, he 1.d4 d5 2.c4 Nf6 3.Nc3 h6 4.cxd5 ing left but to move on. We left
gets a passed pawn and a very weak Nxd5 5.e4 Nxc3 6.bxc3 e5 7.Bc4 Sturbridge, some of us heading back
white h-pawn out of the deal. This Qe7 8.Ne2 g6 9.0–0 Bg7 10.Be3 to our hometowns, some to the tedi-
way, I have a glaring weakness on 0–0 11.Qd2 exd4 12.cxd4 [12.Bxh6] um of our careers, and some to new,
g3 but at least Black has no simple 12...Kh7 13.Rac1 c6 14.Ng3 b6 15.f4 as-yet undiscovered paths which would
infiltration plan. 44...Rg7 45.Kf2 Bb7 Black is utterly outplayed here, lead us perhaps close and perhaps far
Rg4 46.Re3 Nf7 47.Rb2 Nd6 but this turns out to be the losing move. away from our current lives. But the
48.Rbe2 a4! 49.bxa4 Nxc4 50.Rb3 Much better was f5. 16.f5 Rd8 lake, the white-washed table cloths,
My plan here is to trade off all the 17.fxg6+ Kh8 18.Rxf7 Qd6 19.Rxg7 and the ticking of chess clocks will
queenside pawns, even if it means This leads to a very simple win, but stay engraved on our memories and
ending up down material. 50...Kxd5 in analysis I find an aesthetically very hopefully, one day, each of us will
51.Rb5+ Kc6 52.Rb3 Rg8 53.Rc3 pleasing queen sacrifice which would fling open the aging doors of the
Kc5 54.Re1 Ra8 55.Ra1 Rxa4 have netted White bragging rights conference center once again.
56.Ke2 b5 57.Rb3 Ra8 58.Kf2 Bd5 for a brilliancy. 19.Bxh6 Qxd4+
59.Rc3 Rg8 60.Re1 f4 61.Re7 Kd4 (19...Qxg6 20.Bxg7+ Kg8 21.Rf6+
62.Rb3 fxg3+ 63.Rxg3 Rxg3 Kxg7 (21...Rd5 22.Rxg6 Nd7 23.Be5+ “All I want to do, ever,
64.Kxg3 Nxa3 65.Rh7 b4 66.Rxh5 Kf7 24.Qf4+ Ke7 25.Qg5+ Ke8 is just play Chess”
b3 Not exactly what I hoped for, but 26.Re6+ Kf7 27.Re7+ Kf8 28.Qg7#)
I can try to play here and hope that 22.Nf5+ Kxf6 23.e5+ Kxf5 24.Rf1+ — Bobby Fischer
in his time trouble (both Kis and I Kg4 25.Be2+ Kh4 26.Qf4+)
OCTOBER-DECEMBER 2010 9
CHESS HORIZONS
Ivanov Annotates
by GM Alexander Ivanov
White: Ivanov, Alexander (2615) messy (14...Nf7!?) ] 14...Nxf3+ 28.c5!+-] 27.exd6+ Kd8 28.c5 Bd7
Black: Bradford, Joseph (2414) 15.gxf3 Bd7 [15...0-0 16.0-0-0+/=] 29.Bd3?! [29.bxa6 bxa6 30.Kd2 Bc6
[C03] French, Tarrasch 16.0-0-0 0-0-0 [16...0-0? 17.Qd3+-] 31.Rb1 Kd7 32.Rb6+- was winning
U.S. Senior Open, easily] 29...axb5 30.axb5 Kc8
Boca Raton, Florida 2010
cuuuuuuuuC [30...e5 This counterplay is insuffi-
{wdk4wdw4} cient; White’s connected passers are
1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nd2 a6 4.Bd3 {dpdbdw0p} too strong. 31.Kd2 e4 (31...Kc8
[4.Ngf3 c5 (4...Nf6) ] 4...c5 5.dxc5 {pdwgpdwd} 32.Ra1 Kb8 33.Kc3 g4 34.Bc4 h5
Nf6 6.exd5 This move is less popular {dwdwdpdq} 35.Bd5! Rc8 36.Kb4 h4 37.Rc1+-)
than [6.Qe2 or; 6.Ngf3 but we were {wdPdwdwd} 32.Bc4 Kc8 33.Ra1 Kb8 34.Kc3+-]
following the game Ivanov-Shulman, {)wdwdPdw} 31.Re1?! Again a little too cautious
USA Championship 2006] 6...Qxd5 {w)BGQ)w)} [31.Kd2 Kb8 32.Rb1 Rc8 33.c6 I
7.Ngf3 Bxc5 8.Qe2 Nbd7 9.a3N {dwIRdwdR} saw this idea, but was afraid to lose
This is a novelty. Against Shulman I vllllllllV all three Queenside Pawns for the
played 9.c4, but didn't get much out Bishop. 33...Bxc6 34.bxc6 Rxc6
of the opening. Also known is [9.Ne4 17.Ba5!+/= My opponent said 35.d7 Rd6 36.Rb6!+- Unlike us
b5 10.0-0 Bb7 11.Nxf6+ gxf6!?= after the game that he overlooked this humans computers don't miss such
Rublevsky-Volkov 2005] 9...Bd6!? move. I like it more than [17.Bc3 Qh6+ tactics. (36.Re1? Kc7+/=) ]
Black is preparing Ne5. After the 18.Kb1 Bc7 unclear] 17...Bc7?! Other 31...Kb8 32.Kd2 Rc8 33.Re5 h5
natural [9...0-0 White can try 10.0-0 options are [17...Qh6+ suggested by 34.Ke3 h4 35.Kd4 g4 36.Bc4
and if 10...b5 then 11.b4 Ba7 12.Bb2+/=] Bradford as an improvement; still [36.Ke3] 36...Re8 37.Ke3 [37.c6
10.c4?! This and White's next move White is better after 18.Kb1 Bc7 bxc6 38.bxc6 Bxc6 39.Bxe6+-]
don't go well together. The immediate 19.Bxc7 Kxc7 20.Qe5+ Kc8 21.Rd6 37...f4+? Black's last hope in time
11.Ne4 was probably better, hoping Qf6 22.Qc5+ Kb8 23.Rhd1 Rc8 trouble was [37...Rg8 38.Bxe6!
to win time by attacking the black (23...Bc8 24.Bxf5!+-) 24.Qe3+/-; (38.Kf4? g3 39.fxg3 Rg4+-+ since
Queen with pieces and saving c4 for 17...Bf4+ probably the best 18.Kb1 Bc4 is hanging; 38.Be2 g3 39.fxg3
later. 10...Qh5 11.Ne4 [11.b4 Ne5=] Rde8 19.Rd4!? e5 20.Rxd7! Kxd7 hxg3 40.hxg3 Rxg3+ 41.Kf4 Rg1
11...Nxe4 12.Bxe4 Ne5?! Black is 21.Qd3+ Ke7 (21...Kc8 22.Qd6!+-) 42.Bh5+/-) 38...Re8 39.Bxd7 (39.c6
too eager to trade pieces. [12...Nf6 22.Qd5 with initiative] 18.Bxc7 bxc6 40.bxc6 Bxe6 41.Kf4!+- Kc8
13.Bc2 Bd7=] 13.Bd2 This stops the Qh6+ [18...Kxc7 19.Qe5+ Kc8 42.d7+ Bxd7 43.cxd7+ Kxd7
possible Qa5+, but allows Black's 20.Rd6 Qxf3 21.Rhd1+/- and 44.Rxe8 Kxe8 45.Kxf5+-)
next strong move which compromis- 21...Qxf2 loses to 22.Rxd7 Rxd7 39...Rxe5+ 40.Kd4+-] 38.Kxf4 Rf8+
es both sides' Pawn structures. White 23.Qxe6+-] 19.f4 Kxc7 20.Qe5+ 39.Kxg4 Rxf2 40.h3 Now it's over.
had two ways to get a plus. First the Kc8 21.Rd6+/- Qf6 Black has noth- 40...Rc2 41.Bxe6 Bxb5 42.Kxh4
simple [13.Nxe5 Qxe2+ 14.Kxe2 ing better. 22.Rhd1 Qxe5 23.fxe5 g5 Rd2 43.Rd5 Rc2 44.d7 1-0
Bxe5+/= I wasn't sure whether White 24.b4! [Less convincing is 24.c5?!
could convert the advantage here. Then Kc7 25.Bb3 Rhe8 and it's harder for
the computer move; 13.Bf4 Nd3+ White to advance his Queenside
(13...Nxc4 14.Qxc4 Bxf4 15.Bc6+! Pawns] 24...Kc7 [24...Rhe8 25.R1d3
bxc6 16.Qxc6+ Ke7 17.Qxa8+/-) g4 26.Bb3 h5 27.b5+/-] 25.a4 Bc8 “No one ever won a
14.Qxd3 Bxf4 15.Qd4 f6 (15...0-0 [25...h5 26.b5 axb5 (26...g4 27.b6+ game by resigning”
16.Bxh7+ Qxh7 17.Qxf4+/=) 16.0-0 Kc8 28.c5+-) 27.axb5 b6 28.c5+-]
Bc7 17.Rfd1 0-0 18.c5+/=] 13...f5 26.b5 Rxd6 Avoiding the exchange — Saviely Tartakower
14.Bc2 [14.Bc3?! Ng6 looks too also loses [26...axb5 27.axb5 b6
10 WWW.MASSCHESS.ORG
CHESS HORIZONS
On June 27th MACA President play against White's center. The fact Bxe4 15.Be6 Rb8 is even better for
Ken Ballou announced the winners that White has control over the c4 Black: 16.Qc4 Ngf6 17.Kf2 Bd5
of the Most Interesting Game prizes square seems to be a bonus as well: 18.Bxd5 Nxd5-/+; And 14.Qxb7 is a
for the 79th Massachusetts Open: (10.Bxc5?! accepts the pawn, but is total disaster after 14...dxe3 15.Qxa8+
probably not best: 10...Qc7! (10...Bxb2 Kxf7-+] 14...Rxg8 15.cxd4 Bxe4
11.Rb1 Bc3 12.Bxb4 is good for White) Black has emerged from the tactics
Open: IM Igor Foygel
11.Be3 (11.Bxb4 Nc6 12.Bc3 Bxc3 with a clear edge. He has the 2 Bishops,
Under 2000: Danny Angermeier 13.bxc3 Qxf4) 11...Bxb2 12.Rb1 Bc3 control of d5, and a safer King. 16.Kf2
13.Ne2 Nf6 gives Black the initia- Bd5 [16...Rb8!? 17.Qd1 Rb2 looks a
Under 1800: Eugene Bedard tive) 10...Nd7 11.Ngf3 Nh6 12.Bd3 little more direct. It's unlikely White
Under 1600: Matthew Webber 0-0 13.Qe2 Qc7 14.0-0 gives White will survive the position after 18.Ne2
a nice edge. (If White is in a particu- Bd3 19.Re1 Nf6] 17.Qd3 Kf7 18.Ngf3
The games were judged by larly belligerent mood, he can try Rgc8 19.Rhc1 Qb5!
Rhode Island master David Griego. 14.0-0-0!? ) ] 9...bxc3 10.bxc3 Qa5
11.Qb3 An efficient multi-purpose cuuuuuuuuC
move, defending c3, and attacking {rdrdwdwd}
White: Kelleher, Bill
Black: Foygel, Igor both b7 and f7. 11...Nd7! {dwdn0kgp}
[B06] Robatsch cuuuuuuuuC {pdw0wdpd}
79th Mass. Open Open {rdwdkdn4} {dqdbdwdw}
Notes by FM David Griego {dbdn0pgp} {wdw)w)wd}
{pdw0wdpd} {dwdQGNdP}
1.e4 g6 2.d4 Bg7 3.Nc3 d6 {1w0wdwdw} {PdwHwIPd}
4.Be3 a6 5.h3 b5 6.f4?! This is a {wdw)P)wd} {$w$wdwdw}
somewhat odd mix of systems against {dQ)wGwdP} vllllllllV
the Modern with ...a6. The "pure
{PdwHwdPd} An interesting practical solution,
Austrian" set-up with Nf3 and Bd3
is considered the main line, and a Be3,
{$wdwIBHR} by a player known for making excel-
Qd2 (with perhaps h4) formation is
vllllllllV lent practical decisions. Igor is no
also quite testing. 6...b4 7.Nb1 Bb7 A very dynamic answer to White's doubt confident his technical skills
8.Nd2 c5?! Perhaps provoked by threat. [11...Bc6 12.Nc4 is awkward will bring home the point with the
White's slow play, Black looks to take for Black.] 12.Bc4 [12.Qxb7? Rb8 Queens off the board. [19...Kg8 or;
the initiative immediately. [Preparing 13.Qxa6 Qxc3 and things are falling 19...Nf6 are ways to keep the Queens
...c5 with 8...Nd7 seems better.] 9.c3?! with check: 14.Bb5 Qxa1+ 15.Ke2 on the board, although 20.f5 might
Ostensibly the idea is to support the cxd4 16.Bxd7+ Kxd7 17.Qa7+ Kc8 create some counterplay.] 20.Qxb5
center, but it seems to have the oppo- 18.Bf2 (18.Qa6+ Kd8 19.Qa7 Qb2) axb5 21.Rxc8 Rxc8 22.Rb1 [22.a4
site effect. [Better is 9.dxc5! dxc5 18...Qc1 is winning for Black.] Ra8 23.a5 Ra6 isn't dangerous for
with 2 possibilities for White: (if 12...cxd4! Another counterattacking Black, as he can go after the a-pawn
9...Bxb2 10.Rb1 (10.cxd6?! Bxa1 solution to White's threat. Black has with ...Nb8-c6, or even ...Nc5!?-b7.]
11.Qxa1 Nf6 isn't quite sound) 10...Bc3 calculated that the resulting compli- 22...Rb8 23.Ng5+ Ke8 24.a3 Nf6
11.Ne2 is nice for White) 10.e5! cations will favor him. [12...Nh6 is 25.g4 Kd7 26.Ke2 Bc6 27.Kd3 h6
spiking the g7 Bishop is critical. In also possible.] 13.Bxf7+ Kf8 14.Bxg8 [27...Ra8!? targets the a-pawn imme-
general, this is a pawn structure Black [14.Bxd4 Bxd4 15.cxd4 Bxe4 16.Be6 diately, and Black has a virtually
should avoid in Pirc/Modern openings, Bxg2 17.Rh2 Bc6 leaves White with winning position after: 28.Rb3 Bd5
as it is difficult to generate counter- the less safe King position.; If 14.cxd4 29.Rxb5 (29.Rc3 Ba2! and ...Nd5 is
OCTOBER-DECEMBER 2010 11
CHESS HORIZONS
unstoppable.) 29...Rxa3+ 30.Ke2 h6 time.) 16...Nd6 17.Qc2 creates decent consider ending White's fun in a most
31.Ngf3 Ne4] 28.Nge4 Nd5 29.Nc3 attacking chances.] 13...Bd6 14.h6 forceful manner with 19...Qf6! 20.Bxf6
Nxc3! Another excellent decision. g6 15.Qf3?! Stepping right into the Rxf6-+ when Black is just up a piece.]
Grabbing the two Bishops is attrac- open f-file looks risky. Perhaps worth 20.h7+ Kh8 21.Rh4! White's attack-
tive on the surface, but Igor most a go is [15.Nxg6!? hxg6 16.h7+ Kh8 ing chances seem to be gaining
likely judged [29...Nxe3 30.Kxe3 17.Bh6 Rf7 18.Bxg6 Rc7 19.g4 with momentum.... 21...Ne4? [21...Bd7
Ra8 31.Rb3 as more difficult to con- a good amount of compensation for 22.Rf4 Kg7! Once the Rook is off the
vert.] 30.Kxc3 Ra8 31.Rb3 [31.Ra1 the piece.] 15...Bxe5 16.Bxe5 Ne4 h-file, this active defensive move is
Ra4 32.Nb3 Bd5 and White's pawns Out of a quiet opening, we are get- possible. The idea is to win a tempo
will start to drop.] 31...Bd5 32.Rxb5 ting some wild complications... by attacking the Bishop. (22...Ng4
Rxa3+ 33.Nb3 Kc6 34.Rb4 Rxb3+ 17.Qg4?! This is walking into a fork, 23.Rxg4 Qe7 24.0-0-0 and that dark
The resulting same colored Bishop but there are some even crazier things squared Bishop is more than enough
ending is a clean cut win for Black: on the way. Objectively, White would compensation for the Queen!) 23.Bc2
35.Rxb3 Bxb3 36.Kxb3 Kd5 37.f5 rather have Black take on f2 with the Ng4 24.Rxg4+ Kf7 Hard to say what
[37.Kc3 Ke4] 37...Ke4 38.Bd2 gxf5 Rook, for example: [17.Qe2!? Rxf2 the assessment here is, but getting
39.gxf5 h5 40.Bg5 Bf6 41.Bxf6 exf6 (17...Nxf2 18.0-0 Nxd3 19.Qxd3 isn't out of that pin is some sort of moral
42.Kc4 h4 0-1 that much fun for Black.) 18.Qg4 victory.] 22.0-0-0? Threatening to take
Rf5 19.Qxg6+! (19.Bxe4?! isn't as on e4 for free, but White should look at
White:!LePoer, Geoff good: 19...Rxe5 20.0-0-0 (20.Bxg6? the most forcing moves first: [22.Bxe4!
Black: Angermeier, Danny doesn't work due to 20...Rg5-+) is most direct, and good for White:
[D03] Torre Attack (Tartakower 20...Bd7-/+ with a healthy extra 22...dxe4 (22...Qf8 23.Ke2 Qg7 24.Rf1
Variation) pawn) 19...hxg6 20.h7+ Kf7 21.h8Q is the end) 23.Rd1! (Even the slow
79th Mass. Open U2000 Qxh8 22.Bxh8 Rh5 23.Rxh5 gxh5 looking 23.g4 is dangerous 23...Qe7
Notes by FM David Griego 24.Bxe4 should lead to a draw] 24.g5 Qxh7 25.Bxf6+ Kg8 26.Rxh7
17...Nxf2 18.Qxg6+! Kxh7 27.Rd1+/- and Black will strug-
1.d4 d5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.Bf4 e6 4.e3 cuuuuuuuuC gle to hold this.) 23...Bd7 (23...Qe7
Be7 5.Bd3 0-0 6.Nbd2 Nbd7 7.Ne5 24.Rh6+-) 24.Rxd7! White cashes in
{rdb1w4kd}
c5 8.c3 Nxe5 9.dxe5 Nd7 10.Nf3 f6 his chips and forces a winning King
11.h4!? This at least seems to threat-
{0pdwdwdp} and Pawn ending: 24...Qxd7 25.Bxf6+
en something with Bxh7+, although
{wdwdpdQ)} Qg7 26.Bxg7+ Kxg7 27.h8Q+ Rxh8
the threat isn't really that concrete. {dw0pGwdw} 28.Rxh8 Kxh8 29.Kf2+-] 22...Bd7??
11...fxe5 12.Nxe5 [12.Bxh7+? Kxh7 {wdwdwdwd} Just as in the note after Black's 19th,
13.Ng5+ Kg8 14.Nxe6 (14.Qh5? {dw)B)wdw} the best thing to do is to break the pin
Nf6-+ doesn't work at all.) 14...Qb6 {P)wdwhPd} at all costs: [22...Qd6! 23.Rxe4 (23.Bxd6
15.Nxf8 Kxf8 (15...exf4 16.Nxd7 {$wdwIwdR} Nxd6 24.Bc2 Bd7 25.g4 Raf8 26.g5
Bxd7 (16...Qe6!?) 17.Qxd5+ Be6) vllllllllV Rf1 shouldn't be too much trouble for
16.Bg3 Qxb2-/+] 12...Nf6 13.h5?! OK! This is indeed an inspired, Black) 23...Qxe5 24.Rxe5 Rxg6 25.Rh1
This looks like a pretty slow plan, albeit forced, way to continue! 18...hxg6 Bd7 and Black can just triple-team
although this h-pawn later proves to 19.Bxg6? It's tempting to threaten mate the h7 pawn with ...Rg7, .....Rf8-f7
be quite a troublesome fellow. [13.Qe2 in one, but it's the wrong continuation. ending all counterplay.] 23.Rf1??
preparing Queenside castling isn't [19.h7+ is much better 19...Kf7 20.0-0! [23.Bxe4! still wins a similar King
timed that well either: 13...Bd6 14.0- Ke7 (20...Ke8 21.Rxf2 Rxf2 22.h8Q+ and Pawn ending after: 23...dxe4
0-0 Qc7-/+; Since White has already Rf8 23.Bxg6+ with tremendous com- (23...Kg7 24.Rf1 wins a massive amount
taken the gloves off, he may want to pensation for the exchange.) 21.Rxf2 of material) 24.Rxd7!? (Although here
stay in "hostile mode" with: 13.g4!? Rxf2 22.Kxf2 Bd7 23.h8Q Qxh8 White can make use of the access to
Bd6 14.g5 Bxe5 15.Bxe5 Ne4 16.f3 24.Bxh8 Rxh8 25.Bxg6=/+ somehow the f-file he didn't have in the 22.Bxe4!
(16.Bxe4!? dxe4 17.Qxd8 Rxd8 18.c4 ends with material equality, although variation, and play: 24.Rf1+- ) 24...Qxd7
might reduce White's winning chances, Black can play for a win with his bet- 25.Bxf6+ Qg7 26.Bxg7+ Kxg7 27.h8Q+
but Black will suffer for quite a long ter structure.] 19...Rf6? [Black should Rxh8 28.Rxh8 Kxh8 29.Kc2+-] 23...Qb8!
12 WWW.MASSCHESS.ORG
CHESS HORIZONS
cuuuuuuuuC
White: Strickland, Eric White: Hong, Jenshiang
{r1wdwdwi}
Black: Bedard, Eugene Black: Webber, Matthew
{0pdbdwdP} [B21] Sicilian Defense: Smith- [B24] Sicilian, Closed
{wdwdp4Bd} Morra Gambit 79th Mass. Open U1600
{dw0pGwdw} 79th Mass. Open U1800
{wdwdndw$} 1.e4 c5 2.Nc3 Nc6 3.g3 g6 4.Bg2
{dw)w)wdw} 1.e4 g6 2.f4 d6 3.Nf3 c5 4.d4 Nd7 Bg7 5.d3 e6 6.Be3 b6 7.Qd2 Nge7
{P)wdwdPd} 5.Nc3 b6 6.Bb5 a6 7.Bc6 Ra7 8.dxc5 8.Nge2 Nd4 9.0-0 Bb7 10.Nd1 0-0
{dwIwdRdw} dxc5 9.0-0 Qc7 10.Ne5 f6 11.Qd5 11.Nc1 e5 12.c3 Ne6 13.Bh6 f5
vllllllllV Nh6 12.Be3 fxe5 13.fxe5 Bb7 14.Bxh6 14.Bxg7 Nxg7 15.f4 Qc7 16.Ne3
Finally the right idea! It's most Bxh6 15.Qf7+ Kd8 16.Bxd7 Kxd7 Rad8 17.Ne2 d5 18.Rac1 Qb8
interesting that Black had the oppor- 17.Rad1+ Kc8 18.Qe6+ Kb8 19.Nd5 19.Qc2 fxe4 20.dxe4 d4 21.Qb3+
tunity to break this pin twice (on 2 Bxd5 20.Rxd5 Rd8 21.Rfd1 Rxd5 Kh8 22.cxd4 exd4 23.Nd5 Nxd5
different diagonals!), but the third 22.Rxd5 Rb7 23.g3 Qc8 24.Qxc8+ 24.exd5 Nf5 25.Rf2 Ne3 26.a4 Nxg2
chance proves to be a charm. The Kxc8 25.e6 Rc7 26.Kf2 Rc6 27.c4 27.Rxg2 Bxd5 28.Qd3 Bxg2 29.Kxg2
game now ends very quickly: 24.Bxf6+ Rxe6 28.Kf3 Rf6+ 29.Ke2 Kc7 30.b3 Qb7+ 30.Kg1 Qd5 31.b3 Rde8
Nxf6 25.Rxf6 Qe5 26.Rhf4 Kg7 g5 31.e5 Re6 32.Kf3 Bg7 33.Ke4 Kc6 32.Nc3 Qxb3 33.Qb1 Qxb1 34.Nxb1
Probably the maximum amount of 34.g4 Rh6 35.Kf5 e6+ 36.Ke4 exd5+ Re2 35.h4 Rfe8 36.Kf1 Kg7 37.Na3
swings and excitement you could 37.cxd5+ Kd7 38.Kf5 Rxh2 39.a3 d3 38.Rc3 d2 39.Rd3 Re1+ 40.Kg2
pack into a 26 move game! 0-1 Rf2+ 40.Kxg5 Bxe5 41.b4 cxb4 d1Q 41.Rxd1 Rxd1 0-1
42.axb4 a5 43.b5 a4 44.d6 Kxd6
45.Kh5 a3 46.g5 Bf4 47.Kh6
Bxg5+ 48.Kg7 a2 0-1
OCTOBER-DECEMBER 2010 13
CHESS HORIZONS
John Hillery, the premier organizer of Southern certainly had the skills for it. Perhaps John thought dif-
California tournaments for the last decade, died Sept. 20 ferently, because he kept paying rent on his unused Hollywood
at his home in Hollywood, California. He was 58. apartment for the two years he lived in New Windsor.
Some of you remember John from his time in He was right - the job offer never materialized. In
Massachusetts in the 1970s. Perhaps I can give you more my opinion, this was tragic for all concerned. The USCF
insight into his life. He helped shape Southern California went through a series of editors who struggled with the
chess for nearly 30 years. demands of the job, while John grew frustrated waiting
John grew up in Lynn. As a teenager, his great pas- for another chance at his dream job.
sion was acting. He didn’t get interested in chess until he His stint in New Windsor prompted one positive
attended Northeastern University in Boston and an ill- change – John learned to use a computer, becoming an
ness kept him from performing with the drama club. expert desktop publisher and learning enough HTML to
That was the “Fischer boom” era of the early 1970s, create several websites. He put out Rank and File, the
and John plunged into Boston chess enthusiastically. I Southern California Chess Federation’s magazine, almost
met him in the Boylston Chess Club. He was distinctive single-handedly, doing all of the editing and layout and
even then, wearing a suit and tie while most young people writing most of the articles.
dressed colorfully and grew their hair long. In the last decade, John founded “Western Chess” to
When the editor of Chess Horizons asked readers to run his own tournaments. His attempts to make money
submit their best games, John, then rated Class D, sent in as an organizer fared poorly, as tournament attendance
one of his. Years later, I blamed him for turning me into slumped and fees for hotel rental rose. Realizing that
a chess writer because he shamed me into making my scholastic events were more likely to turn a profit, he
first contribution to Chess Horizons. devoted more attention to scholastic tournaments.
John progressed steadily, earning a master title in John surprised me again by attending the 2009
1979 and taking his first steps toward promoting chess USCF meeting in Indianapolis. Few players would want
by joining the MACA board. Amid the chaos and rancor to sit through a day and a half of tedious meetings and
of MACA meetings, John’s calm manner and adherence boring speeches, but John spent hundreds of dollars to
to formality stood out. go and “set the idiots straight.” He accomplished his task
He visited Los Angeles, apparently on a whim, in with humor, as you can see at his Western Chess blog.
1981 and stayed for the rest of his life. He was a regular He administered a second dose of rational thinking this
participant in FIDE-rated Futurities at The Chess Set, summer at the 2010 U.S. Open in Irvine, California.
Lina Grumette’s legendary Hollywood club, although he Southern California tournaments offer amenities not
played less frequently in open tournaments. His rating found elsewhere. Give John credit for most of the best
peaked above 2300. More recently, he took up corre- innovations. John served as chief director of our state
spondence chess and achieved a master’s rating. championship, an invitational round robin for many
John began a new chess phase in the early 1980s by years, and helped with fundraising. Most of our tourna-
serving as an assistant TD at various tournaments. Soon he ments offer brilliancy or best game prizes, a practice
was on his way to becoming a National Tournament John began in the 1980s. All scoresheets collected are
Director and an International Arbiter, nationally esteemed posted online within a few days, thanks to John. And
for his encyclopedic knowledge of USCF rules. No other John’s tournaments were among the first to post stand-
TD was as erudite or as steadfastly impartial. I cannot ings online every evening. Tournament directors, like
recall criticism of a single decision by John. umpires, attract attention mostly by their errors. John
After a successful first stint as Rank and File editor, was often overlooked because of the excellence of his
John moved to USCF headquarters in New Windsor, work. Typically, he cringed when praised, because he
New York, to work as Chess Life assistant editor. I assumed felt that he was merely satisfying the standard for the
that he would eventually earn a promotion to editor; he job. John, you were too modest. Well done!
14 WWW.MASSCHESS.ORG
CHESS HORIZONS
White: Ivars Dahlberg Kxa2 Qa6+ 24 Ba5 No better is 24 26 Bb5 Qa7+ 27 Kh1 Re7 28 f5 to
Black: John Hillery Kb3 R8c4. Qxa5+ 25 Kb3 Qb5+ 26 maintain the dynamic balance. 22 e5
Star Warriors II Futurity, Ka3 R8c3+!, White Resigns. Bf5 23 Qd2 Ne4 24 Qd1 dxe5 25 g4
Hollywood 1982 Bd7 26 d6 Qc8 Not bad, but Black
Notes by IM!Jack Peters White:!John Hillery seems to obtain an edge by 26…Qb7
Black: Michael Wierzbicki, 27 f5 gxf5 28 gxf5 Bf6.
1 c4 c6 2 Nc3 d5 3 d4 Nf6 4 Bg5 Golden Knights Championship, cuuuuuuuuC
An unusual treatment of the Slav correspondence 1989-1990 {wdqdrdkd}
Defense. Ne4 5 Nxe4 dxe4 6 Qd2 Notes by IM!Jack Peters
{dwdbdpgw}
Bf5 7 e3 h6 8 Bh4 g5 Accepting a
weakened Kingside in return for rapid 1 d4 Nf6 2 c4 e6 3 Nf3 c5 4 d5
{wdw)wdp0}
development. 9 Bg3 Bg7 10 0-0-0 exd5 5 cxd5 d6 The Modern
{0w0w0wdw}
Sharpest. Na6 11 f3 Also 11 Ne2 c5 Benoni. 6 Nc3 g6 7 e4 Bg7 8 Bg5 A {P4Ndn)PG}
12 a3 Qb6 13 d5 should keep an edge. sideline, but with some venom. h6 9 {dpdwdwdw}
c5 12 fxe4 Bxe4 13 Bd3 Bxd3 14 Bh4 a6 Black has abandoned 9…g5 {w)wdBdw)}
Qxd3 Rc8 15 Kb1?! Underestimating 10 Bg3 Nh5 11 Bb5+ Kf8 because {dw$QdRIw}
Black’s counterattack. Correct is 15 12 e5! g4 13 0-0! and 12 e5! Nxg3 vllllllllV
d5 Qb6 16 Qe2. Qb6 16 h4? White 13 fxg3 dxe5 14 0-0 give White a 27 f5! Anyway. gxf5 28 gxf5
can maintain equality only by 16 Nf3 powerful attack. 10 Nd2 Harmless is Nf6?! The complicated 28…Bxf5 29
Nb4 17 Qe4! (very dangerous is 17 10 a4 g5 11 Bg3 Nh5. b5 11 Be2 0-0 Rxf5 Qxf5 30 d7 leads to a draw by
Qb3? Qg6+ 18 Kc1 b5! 19 a3 cxd4!) 12 0-0 Nbd7 13 Qc2 Re8 Most nat- 30…Qg6+! 31 Kf1 (not 31 Kh1?
cxd4 18 Be5!. cxd4 17 exd4 Nb4 18 ural, but 13…c4 14 b4 cxb3 15 axb3 Rd8 32 Bxd8? Nf2 mate) Qf5+ 32
Qe4? Losing. Maybe White can sur- Bb7 is also adequate. 14 a4 b4 15 Kg2 Qg6+ 33 Kf1, unless White
vive 18 c5! Qc6 19 Qf5 e6 20 Qf3 Nd1 Heading for c4 via e3. Before dares to risk 33 Bg4 Ra8 34 d8Q+
Qa4 21 Qb3. Rxc4 19 Nf3 0-0! White can establish a bind, though, Rxd8 35 Qxd8+ Kh7 36 Kh3 h5 37
Castling into the fire, but White gets Black has two opportunities for Bc8. 29 Be1 Rb8 Acquiescing to a
cooked first. 20 hxg5 Rfc8 21 gxh6 strong counterplay. b3!? The other small disadvantage. A similar evalua-
If 21 a3, Black wins the Queen by method is 15…g5 16 Bg3 Nxd5 17 tion applies to 29…Rb7 30 Nxa5 Rb8
21…Na2! 22 Kxa2 Rc2 23 Rb1 Nc4 Nf4, when 18 Nxd6?! Ne5! 19 31 Rc4 Bxf5 32 Nxb3. Black spotted
R8c3! 24 Ka1 Qb3 (threatening Nxe8?? loses to 19…b3. 16 Qd3 the problem with 29…Bxf5? 30
25...Qxa3+) 25 Qxe7 Bf8. Black does not fear 16 Qxb3 g5 17 Bxb4 Bc2?, his original intention.
Bg3 Nxe4 18 Nxe4 Rxe4 19 Qc2 White would win with 31 d7! Nxd7
cuuuuuuuuC
Nf6. Rb8 17 f4 Safer are 17 Nc3 32 Qd5, refuting 32…Nf6 most ele-
{wdrdwdkd} and 17 Ne3. Rb4 18 Nc4 Nb6 19 gantly by 33 Rxf6 Bxf6 34 Nd6 Qe6
{0pdw0pgw} Nde3 Nxc4 20 Nxc4 a5! Nunn’s rec- 35 Nxe8! Qxd5 36 Nxf6+. 30 Bxa5
{w1wdwdw)} ommendation. The fight intensifies, Bxa4 Not 31…Bxf5? 32 Nb6. 31
{dwdwdwdw} and Black’s chances are no worse. Bc7 Rb4 32 Nb6 Qb7 33 Nxa4
{whr)Qdwd} 21 Rac1 As 21 e5? Ba6 favors Rxa4 34 Rc4!? Black gets plenty of
{dwdwdNGw} Black. Qc7 The computer likes compensation from 34 d7?! Rd4! 35
{P)wdwdPd} 21…Qd7 22 e5 dxe5 23 fxe5 Nxd5, dxe8Q+ Nxe8. Qb5! As 35 d7 Nxd7
{dKdRdwdR} but 24 Bg3, preparing 25 Nd6, 36 Rd4 Qxe2 37 Qxe2 Rxd4 should
vllllllllV retakes the initiative. A second alter- hold the draw. 35 Qc1 e4!? Making
Nxa2! Anticipating 22 Kxa2 Ra4+ native, 21…Ba6 22 Qf3 Bxc4 23 White worry about the safety of his
23 Kb1 Qb3, mating. Or, if 22 Qg4, Bxc4 Qd7!?, invites the exchange King. For example, 36 Rxe4? Qc6
Black stops White’s threat by 22…Nc3+ sacrifice 24 Bb5? Rxb5 25 axb5 37 Rxe8+ Nxe8 creates the disturb-
23 Kc2 Nxd1+ 24 Kxd1 Qb3+ 25 Nxe4, when Black’s Bishop will ing threat of 38…Bd4+. 36 Rc2 c4
Ke2 Rc2+ 26 Kf1 Qd3+ 27 Kg1 Qe3+ emerge at d4. White must find the Easiest is 36…Qb4, when 37 Rc4
28 Kh2 Qxh6+. 22 Be1 Rc1+ 23 answer 24 Be1! Nxe4 25 Bxb4 cxb4 Qb5 repeats. Instead, 37 Rxc5?
OCTOBER-DECEMBER 2010 15
CHESS HORIZONS
Qd4+ 38 Kh1 e3 would return the because of 53 Qe8+ Rg8 54 Qb5. 51 54 h4!, Black Resigns. White
advantage to Black. 37 Rxc4 Qb1! The careless 51 Qb7? Rxf5 52 will disrupt Black’s defense by run-
Qxb2 Kg8 probably draws. Rb4 52 ning his King to c5. Because
cuuuuuuuuC f6+ Kh8 53 Ke2! Threatening 54 54…Rxf6? lands in Zugzwang by 55
{wdwdrdkd} Qg1. Less convincing is 53 Kf2? Qxb2 Kg7 56 h5, Black must resort
{dwGwdpgw} Rb6 54 Kg3 Kg8. Rb6 to 54…h5 55 Ke3 Re6+ (another
{wdw)whw0} Zugzwang appears after 55…Rxf6
{dqdwdPdw} cuuuuuuuuC 56 Qxb2 Kg7 57 Qe5!, as 57…Kg6
{rdRdpdwd} {wdwdwdwi} 58 Qg5+ costs Black the Rook) 56
{dpdwdwdw} {dwdwdpdw} Kd3 Rd6+ 57 Kc4 Rb6 58 Kc5 Rb8.
{w)wdBdw)} {w4wdw)w0} White conquers resistance by 59
{dw!wdRIw} {dwdwdwdw} Kd6 Rb4 60 Ke7 Kg8 61 Qg1+ Rg4
vllllllllV {wdwdwdwd} 62 Qh1! Ra4 (or 62…Rb4 63 Qd5)
{dwdwdwdw} 63 Qg2+ Rg4 64 Qb7! Rxh4 65
Nd5?? Fatal. After 37…e3 38 {w0wdKdw)} Ke8. A grand conception fittingly
Rxa4 Qxa4, White could get swin- {dQdwdwdw} ends a magnificent game.
dled by 39 Qc5? Nd7! 40 Qb5? Qxb5 vllllllllV
41 Bxb5 Bxb2!, but the correct 39
Qc4 Qxc4 40 Bxc4 Re4 41 Be2 Nd7
leads to a well-deserved draw. 38
Rd1! From this point, Hillery foresaw “What is the object of playing a gambit opening?... To acquire a
the artistic finish. Nf6 Insufficient are reputation of being a dashing player at the cost of losing a game”
38…Nxc7 39 dxc7 and 38…Ra7 39
Rxe4. Even the trickier 38…Ra2!? — Siegbert Tarrasch
fails, to 39 Qd2! Rxb2 40 Qxd5
Qxd5 41 Rxd5 Rxe2 42 d7 Rf8 43
d8Q b2 44 Qxf8+ Kxf8 45 Rd1. 39
d7 Nxd7 40 Rxe4 Qxe2 41 Rxe2 Ivanov & Shmelov Top 60th
Rxe2 42 Qc6 Rd4 Too many Black
pieces are loose after 42…Bd4+ 43
New Hampshire Open
Kf1 Rf2+ 44 Ke1. If 44…Nc5, easiest
by Bob Messenger
is 45 Qe8+ Kg7 46 Be5+. 43 Rxd4
Bxd4+ 44 Kf1 Again, Black cannot
coordinate his pieces after 44…Rf2+ GM Alexander Ivanov and SM Denys Shmelov, both of Massachusetts,
45 Ke1. White refutes 45…Nf8 by tied for first in the 60th New Hampshire Open, which was held July 10th-
46 Bd6 Rxb2 47 Qe8 Bg7 48 f6. Rxb2 11th in Nashua N.H. IM Joe Fang won the New Hampshire championship as
The best chance, as the b-pawn is the top N.H. resident, with a score of 2.5 - 1.5. Ivanov and Shmelov each won
formidable. 45 Qxd7 Rf2+ 46 Ke1 their first three games and drew their game against each other in the last
b2 47 Qe8+ Not 47 Qxd4?? Rc2!, round, while Fang won the state title with a last round win against
and Black wins. Kg7 If 47…Kh7 48 Massachusetts master Lawyer Times.
Qxf7+ Bg7, White maneuvers the Winners of other sections were: Todd Chase in the U2060, Oliver
Queen into position by 49 Qg6+ Chase in the U1860, Leonid Stolov and Jonathan Kuehne in the U1660,
Kg8 50 Qe6+ Kh8 51 Qe8+ Kh7 52 Henry Clark in the U1460, Alex Franke in the U1260, and NM Frank Sisto and
Qe4, then finishes with 52…Rg2 53 John Gaspar in the Sunday Swiss.
f6+ Kg8 54 Qe6+ Kh7 55 Qf5+ Kg8 Hal Terrie, who organized the tournament, Parker Montgomery and the
56 f7+ Kh8 57 Be5. 48 Be5+ Bxe5 law firm of Upton and Hatfield donated money to increase the prize fund to
49 Qxe5+ Kh7 50 Qe4 Rf4 Black $7,320 and make this 60th anniversary tournament a memorable one. There
cannot reach a “fortress draw” by was a total of 124 players. The tournament was directed by Alex Relyea,
50…Rg2 51 f6+ Kh8 52 Kf1 Rg6 assisted by Hal Terrie, Nita Patel and Bob Messenger.
16 WWW.MASSCHESS.ORG
CHESS HORIZONS
OCTOBER-DECEMBER 2010 17
CHESS HORIZONS
Danish grandmaster Bent Larsen died September 9th Former Chess Horizons editor Michael Glinski Jr
2010 in Buenos Aires, Argentina at the age of 75. Larsen died April 10th 2010 in Nashua N.H. A former resident
won the Danish championship six times and was a can- of Fitchburg who later moved to Hudson, N.H., Glinski
didate for the World Championship four times. During was the editor of Chess Horizons for six issues in 1990,
the 1960s and early 1970s he was a rival with Bobby when Chess Horizons was a bimonthly publication.
Fischer for the role as the best player in the West, and he While living in Fitchburg he was a member of the Wachusett
played on first board ahead of Fischer in the USSR vs. Chess Club in the 1980s and early 1990s, competing in
the Rest of the World match in 1970. He suffered a dis- the club's "A" division championships in 1992 and 1993.
astrous 0-6 defeat to Fischer in their Candidates Match He had a Class A quick rating and correspondence rating.
in Denver, Colorado in 1971. After graduating from Leominster High School in
Larsen played in a few tournaments in New England 1977 Glinski served for four years in the U.S. Army as a
during that time period. He won the 1970 U.S. Open, computer technician. He worked many years for the for-
which was held in Boston. He also won the Merrimack mer NEC Computer Systems in Boxborough as vice
Grand Prix, which was also the New England Open, in president of operations. He was later the president of
Salem N.H. in 1969, and tied with GM Pal Benko for Vibren Technologies Inc., also in Boxborough.
first at the Merrimack Grand Prix in 1968. He was is survived by his long time partner, Carol
Larsen won the following game against IM-to-be A. Winter, of Hudson N.H., and by a daughter, Jessica
Norman Weinstein, who won the Massachusetts state Glinski of Lunenberg, and a brother, John Glinski.
championship in 1972 and the U.S. Open in 1973.
Most general opening books, when presenting the on the 20th move and appears to head the game to a draw.
Ruy Lopez, seem to follow the same pattern: they rush There is an alternative 9. Nxa7+!? (instead of the usual
through variations that exclude 3. … a6 first, as if they are 9. f4) that may need to be explored as a possible future
in a hurry to get them over with fast. They implicitly main line, but Sokolov appears to think that Black has
dismiss them as of course not really worthy of one’s time, chances against this one too. All in all, the Jaenisch is a
in order to get to the “real” Ruy Lopez, the comparative- variation that can upset any White Ruy Lopez player’s
ly enormous and respected body of theory starting with repertoire. Although I have not played it myself (yet –
3. … a6. The consequence of such a narrow view is that maybe I will now!), I have faced it a few times, and been
there are a whole slew of sidelines that a persistent Black slaughtered, so I have felt firsthand its vicious bite. Sokolov,
player can seize upon and surprise a White player who therefore, does well to champion it enthusiastically.
hasn’t taken time to prepare them. All the other Parts display as careful analysis as Part
In his 2009 release, Sokolov offers a full exploration I. Parts II and III cover the Delayed Jaenisch and Cozio
of such sidelines in the Ruy Lopez: the Jaenisch or Variations, neither of which gets much enthusiasm from
Schliemann Gambit (3 … f5), the Cozio (3. … Nge7), the Sokolov. Part IV covers the Smyslov (3. … g6), which
Smyslov (3. … g6), the Bird (3. … Nd4), and the Classical Sokolov calls “sound,” but with 4. d4 White comes away
(3. … Bc5). As he states in his Introduction, the advan- with “somewhat better chances,” in Sokolov’s estimate.
tage of these offbeat variations is that they may throw Part V covers Bird’s Defense (3. … Nd4), which is objec-
White off his prepared book as early as Move 5, forcing tively more favorable for White, but is “complicated” and
him into a long think earlier than he was anticipating. The difficult to figure out accurately over the board. Part VI
question then is, are these variations objectively worthy covers the Classical Defense (3. … Bc5), with several
of a Black player’s attention? Sokolov evaluates them sub-parts that demonstrate this variation’s high complexity.
to determine the current lines that White should use against Sokolov is consistent in presenting this exploration
them, and how Black will make them stand up, if he can. as work in progress. He shows a superb handling of his
The presentation of the variations is thorough and research and understanding of the thicket of intricate lines,
painstaking, and the work Sokolov has put into the book and makes clear that there are many lines, such as the
makes it an essential resource for Ruy Lopez players. aforementioned 9. Nxa7+!?, that are cutting-edge and need
Theory is an ever-changing matrix, and interests and further exploration. These spots will supply sedulous
trends evolve. If White understands that he can’t always preparers of these variations with key resources that they
rely on Black’s playing a nice predictable Chigorin, may try out to find out their merits and demerits further.
Zaitsev, Open, Breyer, or Marshall the way White wants If anything disappoints about this book, it’s that
him to, he will be better armed against these odd and fas- Black players against the Ruy Lopez who want to
cinating variations. eschew mainstream lines but who dislike the Jaenisch
Of the variations covered, the Jaenisch, covered in (and its cousin the Siesta, which Sokolov doesn’t like
Part I – 3. … f5 4. Nc3 fxe4 (or 4. … Nf6) 5. Nxe4 d5 much) don’t really have any conclusively favorable
(or 5. … Nf6 or 5. … Be7) 6. Nxe5 dxe4 7. Nxc6 Qg5 Black lines to choose from. Perhaps they will need to
(or 7. … Qd5?!) – receives the most favorable advoca- set themselves up for some hard knocks with Sokolov’s
tion from Sokolov. The impression I take away is that suggestions for further exploration to discover that a
the Jaenisch may be the most misunderstood of the ones seemingly favorable line for White actually is really
covered here. While it is generally rejected as too risky, playable for Black.
Sokolov argues forcefully that it has hidden resources That point notwithstanding, this book, in this review-
that make it much better for Black than its reputation er’s opinion, is an outstanding companion to a reader
suggests. He rejects the line 7. … Qd5?! because of 8. interested in seeing the current trends in the Ruy Lopez
c4 Qd6 9. Nxa7+!, but he embraces the main line, 7. … and examining them further. It should become part of
Qg5 8. Qe2 Nf6 9. f4, by revealing an improvement at the chess library of every serious Ruy Lopez player.
the 16th move, 16. … Rf8! The line arrives at equality
OCTOBER-DECEMBER 2010 19
CHESS HORIZONS
20 WWW.MASSCHESS.ORG
CHESS HORIZONS
Club News
Billerica Chess Club under 1250, also with a 2-5 score. 20 players participat-
by Brad Ryan ed in the tournament and Nate Smith directed.
Even the half points were hard to earn in the I should note that we meet on Friday nights and we
Billerica March Friday Night Swiss. A field of 3 Experts have always welcomed new players!
and 5 “A” players produced an unprecedented 6-way tie
for first between Experts Art Nugent and Pat Sciacca and Boylston Chess Club
“A” players Nate Smith, John Vaughan, Fangru Jiang by Bob Messenger
and Michelle Chen, each with 2.5 – 1.5 scores. John Alexander Paphitis won the Weaver Adams Qualifier,
Stuebing, Bob Babcock and Daniel Hamil each finished which was held June 2nd to 28th, with a perfect 4-0 score.
in a 3-way tie for best under 1750, each posting a 2 - 2 This event was open to players rated under 1800, and the
result. Daniel Kilgour and Peter Zito tied for best under winner earned an invitation to the Rubens/Landey, the
1250, with 1.5 – 2.5 scores. Nate Smith directed this 20 club's championship for players rated under 2200. The
player tournament. Rubens/Landey was held between July 12th and August
The Billerica 6-round April – May Swiss – always 2nd and finished in a three-way tie between David
considered a warm-up for the 7-round May – June Club Glickman, Jeffrey Hall and Sean Ingham, all with 3-1
Championship – was won by the Club’s 2009 Club scores. Jeffrey Hall finished first on tiebreak, winning
Champion, Expert Pat Sciacca. Pat posted a strong 5.5 - an invitation to the BCC Championship, which is cur-
.5 score, a full point ahead of Expert Raymond Paulson, rently under way.
who finished 2nd with a 4.5 – 1.5 result. “A” players On August 21st 19 players competed in the 17th
Tom McCafferty, Jeffrey Caruso and Michelle Chen tied Charles Drafts Memorial. The winner was Ukrainian IM
for best under 2000, with solid 3 – 2 performances. Evgeni Piankov, playing in his first tournament in the
John Stuebing and Meyer Billmers - both Club stalwarts United States. Piankov won all four of his games, includ-
for more than 2 decades – tied for best under 1750, with ing a win in the last round against FM Chris Chase.
2.5 – 2.5. Bob Babcock – back to the Club after a some- For more information about the club, visit its web
what long absence – was best under 1500, also with a site, boylstonchessclub.org.
2.5 – 2.5 score. David Gilgour was again best under
1250, with a 1.5 – 4.5 score. Nate Smith directed. 17 Sven Brask Chess Club
players participated in the tournament. by Jim Aspinall
Historically, our Club Championship – ’09 being an This summer continued a string of highly competi-
exception – has been decided so late in the evening of tive events at the SBCC. Many strong players have
the 7th and final round that even the draws are very hard passed through the club, but the depth of the fields at the
to get. This was the case again in 2010. Coming into club right now is as strong as it’s been in over 15 years.
the 7th and final round (in a field of 2 Experts and 7 We now have 3 experts, and 7 players over 1900, and in
strong “A” players), Experts Art Nugent and Pat Sciacca addition to beating each other up, all of them suffer
(last year’s Champion) and “A” player Fangru Jiang defeats to the “lower ranked” (only on paper, and of
were tied, each with 4.5 points. Only Sciacca could pull which this author is one) players on a regular basis.
out the win, posting a 5.5 – 1.5 score, and repeating as The July event was the annual Summer Swiss. This
Club Champion. “A” player Max Chia-Hsin Lu finished 5-round event was won by Larry Dean with a score of 4
2nd with a strong 5 – 2 performance, only _ point off the points. Ken Wheeler and Jeff Hall tied for second with
pace. Nugent and Fangru Jiang tied for 3rd, each with 3.5 points. The field of 20 was directed by Jim Aspinall.
4.5 – 2.5 scores. Jiang was also best under 2000. Meyer The August tournament was the Dog Days of Chess.
Billmers, Paul Staten and Bob Babcock tied for best Andrew Hoy topped a field of 16 in the 4-round Swiss
under 1750, with 3 – 4, while Charles Windheim was with a perfect score. George Winsor and Jim Lemieux
best under 1500, with 2 – 5. Eric Heinecke was best tied for 2nd with 3 points. Andrew’s performance put
his rating over 2000 for the first time and made him the
OCTOBER-DECEMBER 2010 21
CHESS HORIZONS
club’s 3rd Expert, joining reigning club co-champion tie for 1st-2nd place in the Michael Glinski Jr. Memorial
Larry Dean and 2 time former champion Jack Correia. tournament, held August 11-September 8, 2010. Tying
Paul Gavlick’s performance was also notable. Ranked for 3rd-4th place with 3.5-1.5 scores were Dave Couture
13th on the wallchart, Paul scored 2.5 points with a 2042 and Seetharaman Ganesan. Sharing fifth place with 3-2
performance rating to pick up 88 rating points. Gerry results were John Moran of Worcester, Tony Cesolini,
Plante directed. Martin Laine, Mark Marshall of Worcester, and Mark
The Sven Brask Chess Club meets Wednesdays from Daley of New Ipswich, NH. A total of 30 players com-
7-1130 at the United Methodist Church in Plainville, peted. The tournament honored the memory of Michael
MA. For more information see our web site at Glinski Jr. of Hudson, NH, formerly of Fitchburg, who
www.svenbraskcc.org. served as Chess Horizons editor in 1990. He died April
10, 2010 in Nashua, NH at the age of 51.
Wachusett Chess Club
by George Mirijanian Waltham Chess Club
Tony Cesolini, a Class A player from Jaffrey, NH, by Nicholas P. Sterling, Ph.D.
scored 5.5-0.5 to win the Wachusett CC Championship, The highlight of our summer was the observance of
held May 5-June 16, 2010 at the McKay Campus School our 100th First Friday G/10 tournament this August.
at Fitchburg State College. Finishing as runner-up with a The first ever First Friday was directed by Michael
4-1 tally, including one unplayed game, was 15-time Gosselin back in 1996, making our 100th a long-awaited
club champion George Mirijanian of Fitchburg, who watershed to reach. Everyone who came brought lots of
nicked Cesolini for his only draw. Tying for third place munchies to nosh on and made the event a great success.
with 2.5 points apiece were two-time club champion Our attendance numbers this summer have stayed
Bruce Felton of Fitchburg and Glenn Rochon of consistently high, between 16 and 20 players, with occa-
Leominster. Martin Laine of Lunenburg and Dave sional dips when players were away on vacation. We
Couture of Westminster tied for 1st-2nd place in the expect our numbers to return to full strength from
club's "B" Championship, tallying 5.5-1.5. Tying for 3rd- September onward.
4th place with 5-2 scores were Leonard Arsenault and Some highlights from the last few months:
Kenneth Gurge, both of Leominster. Deadlocked in 5th • Denys Shmelov has continued to march through
place with 4-3 results were Michael Manisy of Otter tournament after tournament in winning style. Perfect 7-
River, Paul Lynch, Seetharaman Ganesan of South point scores at the June and July First Fridays, a perfect
Grafton, Brian Biglow of Leominster and Max Sewell of 4-point score at the June G/20 – congratulations to Denys!
Peterborough, NH. A total of 30 players competed in the • The Hot and Steamy G/60 in July featured a
championship event, 22 of whom vied for top honors in remarkable four-way 2-point tie for first among Denys,
the "B" division. Todd Chase, Edward Astrachan, and Andrew Liu.
The Wachusett CC Quick Chess Championship, held • Frank Sisto, Todd Chase, and Geoffrey Collins tied
June 23, 2010, ended in victory for club champion Tony three ways for first place with 3 points out of 4 each in the
Cesolini. In a field of 21 players, the Granite State player Open Section. Vitaliy Ryabinin took sole first place in
tallied a perfect 4-0. Michael Manisy finished second the Under-1400 Section with a perfect score of 4 points.
with a score of 3.5-1.5. Tying for third place with 3-1 • Erik Siggelkoe took sole first place at the August
results were Robert King of Worcester and Thayer First Friday with a score of 6.5 out of 7 points.
Aletheia-Zomlefer of Phoenix, AZ. • Brandon Wu took sole first place in the Under
Robert King was the winner of the Harlow B. Daly 1500 Section at the Aloha G/60 in August with a perfect
Memorial tournament, held July 7-August 2010. In a score of 2 points. Way to go, Brandon!
field of 25 contenders, the Worcester player scored 4.5- The Waltham Chess Club meets every Friday
0.5. Leonard Arsenault was second with a 4-1 tally. evening at 7 PM. For more information see our web site
Tying for 3rd-4th place with 3.5-1.5 scores were Tony at www.walthamchessclub.org.
Cesolini and Martin Laine. Deadlocked in fifth place
with 3-2 performances were George Mirijanian, Bruce “Chess is not like life... it has rules!”
Felton, Kenneth Gurge and Paul Lynch. — Mark"Pasternak
George Mirijanian and Michael Manisy tallied 4-1 to
22 WWW.MASSCHESS.ORG
CHESS HORIZONS
Mail checks, payable to MACA, to: Ken Ballou, 27 Fenway Drive, Framingham, MA 01701-4012
OCTOBER-DECEMBER 2010 23
Massachusetts Chess Association
c/o Robert D. Messenger Nonprofit
4 Hamlett Dr. Apt. 12 Organization
Nashua, NH 03062 U.S. Postage Paid
Billerica, MA
Address Service Requested Permit No. 66
Chess Horizons
October-December 2010
Time-dated material
Please expedite!