Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Department of Craniofacial Growth and Development Dentistry, Division of Orthodontics, Kanagawa Dental College, Japan
122 3/2009 Mandibular rotation and occlusal development during facial growth Springer-Verlag J. Stomat. Occ. Med.
original article
SN plane
Mandibular
rotation
Condylar growth
direction
Fig. 1: Mandibular growth rotation. Cranial registrated superimposition (S, SN plane) of cephalometric tracings of different ages showed that
maxillary and mandibular implant lines were rotated forward during growth. Superimposition registrated by implant lines showed that the growth
direction of condyle is vertical and forward [3]
Although much research [8, 9, 22] has been done on 3) 3rd Stage: After exchange of the lateral segment.
mandibular growth rotation, there are no clear explanations 4) Final Stage: Completion of permanent occlusion.
about the mechanism of development and the physiological
significance of mandibular growth rotation. Mandibular
growth rotation has been categorized as a potential growth Skeletal classification
pattern and not recognized in relation to vertical dimension The skeletal pattern of each individual was classified into
and occlusal function. Many researchers have suggested that Classes I, II, or III based on the Antero-Posterior Dysplasia
vertical dimension and the inclination of the occlusal plane Indicator (APDI), which was developed by Kim YH [10], on
are closely related to the growth pattern of skeletal Classes II completion of permanent occlusion. In the skeletal classifica-
and III [18–21]. tion, Class II corresponds to an APDI reading of <77 , Class I
Human skeletal patterns are more variable than any other between 78 and 84 , and Class III <85 .
animal, and in order to clinically apply the principles of the
curve of Spee, the tangent law, and mandibular rotation,
further study of individual growth and how occlusion com- Measuring the rotation of upper occlusal plane
pletes during growth and development is necessary. The and eruption of the incisors (Fig. 2)
present study examined how the curve of Spee, the tangent To measure the rotation of the upper occlusal plane, the
law, and mandibular rotation are related to occlusion devel- lowest point of the Pterygopalatine Fossa (Ptm) and Frankfort
opment during ontogenesis under the hypothesis that man- Plane (FH) were used as the reference plane. Two cephalo-
dibular rotation depends on the increase in vertical dimension
and is related to the tangent law. In addition, the relationship
between the occlusal plane and the long axis of teeth, skeletal FH plane
patterns, changes in the tangent law, and formation of the
curve of Spee were studied using annually collected longitu-
dinal growth samples.
J. Stomat. Occ. Med. Springer-Verlag Mandibular rotation and occlusal development during facial growth 3/2009 123
original article
Fig. 4: Measurements of lower long axis of the tooth to the closing axis. Closing axes were drawn from the center of the condyle to the cusp of
each tooth. Angles between the closing axis and long axis of the tooth are formed
124 3/2009 Mandibular rotation and occlusal development during facial growth Springer-Verlag J. Stomat. Occ. Med.
original article
the disto-buccal cusp of the first molar, and the front edge of
the condyle.
Statistical analysis
Statistical significance of differences between three craniofa-
cial classes and the inclination of the long axis was analyzed
with SPSS and Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA. Statistical significance
was determined at the level of rejecting the null hypothesis
at 5%.
Results
Alterations in craniofacial pattern, DPO and CA-OP
during growth and development
Fig. 5: Measurements of DPO, DPO real, and alteration of the tooth axis In this study, the skeletal pattern was classified into Classes
of the lower central incisor and first molar. Superimposed cephalometric I, II, and III based on the APDI. The figure from APDI
tracings at the initial stage and final stage according to Björk’s method showed significant difference between Classes II and III at
the age of 6. However, similar figures were seen with APDI,
which became clearer among the classes (Tab. 1). On the
other hand, FH-MP in Classes I and III was slightly de-
creased, but there was no change in Class II. For DPO and
CA-OP, the same pattern of increase by age was observed in
the three classes, with no significant differences between
classes (Tab. 2).
J. Stomat. Occ. Med. Springer-Verlag Mandibular rotation and occlusal development during facial growth 3/2009 125
original article
Tab. 1: Longitudinal alterations in mandibular plane angle (FH-MP) and antero-posterior displasia
indicator (APDI) according to age
Age FH-MP APDI
(year)
Class I Class II Class III Class I Class II Class III
6 30.6 3.8 30.3 4.0 30.4 3.3 78.9 2.9 75.3 1.8# 80.4 4.3#
#{ #{
7 29.9 2.9 32.4 5.5 30.5 3.8 78.9 2.0 75.6 3.4 82.9 4.4#{
8 29.9 3.4 31.2 5.5 29.5 4.5 79.6 3.0#{ 75.6 2.2#{ 83.7 4.0#{
9 29.7 3.8 31.2 5.0 29.5 4.1 80.6 2.8#{ 74.0 2.8#{ 84.3 3.2#{
10 29.3 3.7 31.1 5.1 28.8 4.5 80.2 2.4#{ 75.4 2.4#{ 84.0 3.8#{
11 28.7 4.1 31.1 5.5 28.5 4.8 80.3 2.8#{ 75.6 2.3#{ 85.8 3.8#{
#{ #{
12 28.7 4.0 30.5 6.3 28.0 4.2 80.4 2.1 75.5 2.3 86.9 3.5#{
13 27.8 3.8 31.7 7.1 28.6 4.4 80.9 2.3#{ 75.0 3.0#{ 87.2 3.4#{
14 28.0 4.8 31.0 6.6 26.9 4.4 80.8 1.8#{ 75.6 1.1#{ 87.8 3.7#{
Significantly different between Class I and Class III at P < 0.05.
#
Significantly different between Class II and Class III at P < 0.05.
{
Significantly different between Class I and Class II at P < 0.05.
Tab. 2: Longitudinal alterations in parameters regarding DPO and occlusal plane to the closing axis
(CA-OP) according to age
Age DPO CA-OP
(year)
Class I Class II Class III Class I Class II Class III
6 23.6 4.0 23.0 4.1 23.4 3.9 16.1 2.3 17.0 2.8 17.0 2.0
7 25.0 3.3 22.3 3.5 25.5 4.2 17.5 2.1 16.1 2.3 18.1 2.9
8 26.3 4.2 25.2 5.6 27.2 4.8 18.1 2.4 17.3 3.2 18.5 2.9
9 28.5 4.4 27.9 4.9 29.5 4.7 18.9 2.7 18.6 2.9 19.4 2.9
10 30.8 4.4 29.6 5.0 32.6 4.6 19.8 2.6 19.4 3.0 21.1 2.6
11 32.6 5.3 31.4 4.7 34.2 4.5 20.7 3.3 19.9 2.3 21.5 2.3
12 34.5 4.5 33.5 6.1 37.4 5.1 21.1 2.9 20.9 3.0 22.2 3.0
13 35.3 4.8 34.8 5.4 38.6 5.8 21.5 3.4 21.4 2.7 22.7 3.0
14 36.7 5.7 35.0 5.5 39.6 5.9 22.1 3.1 21.4 2.4 23.5 2.8
Tab. 3: Total changes in parameters regarding Tab. 4: Total changes in parameters regarding
mandibular rotation, occlusal plane rotation and tooth axis and vertical dental height
compensating curve of Spee
Class I Class II Class III
Class I Class II Class III (n = 19) (n = 9) (n = 11)
(n = 19) (n = 9) (n = 11)
L1 Inclination (degree) 11.2 6.8 17.0 9.5 9.4 5.3
Mand Rotation (degree) 10.2 4.1 8.4 4.3 13.1 2.6
L6 Inclination (degree) 4.3 7.9 6.3 9.7 6.4 5.3
UOP Rotation (degree) 4.1 3.0 2.9 2.8 5.5 3.1
L1 VD (mm) 4.8 2.1 5.6 2.0 6.5 2.0
LOP Rotation (degree) 4.2 2.4 4.9 4.2 6.4 4.0
L6 VD (mm) 6.9 2.6 8.3 1.9 9.1 2.4
DPO real (mm) 46.9 8.5 48.3 8.1 54.5 7.4
U1 VD (mm) 3.5 2.2 3.0 2.0 3.1 3.0
Spee (radius, mm) 97.8 20.5 94.4 27.9 108.5 37.9
U6 VD (mm) 9.0 2.8 6.8 1.2# 12.5 3.2#
Spee ideal (mm) 78.1 7.4 77.2 6.9 81.7 15.4
Significantly different between Class I and Class III at P < 0.05.
Significantly different between Class I and Class III at P < 0.05. #
Significantly different between Class I and Class III at P < 0.05.
126 3/2009 Mandibular rotation and occlusal development during facial growth Springer-Verlag J. Stomat. Occ. Med.
original article
Tab. 5: Longitudinal alteration of the angle Class II and increase in Class III. The change was more
between the tooth long axis of the lower central significant in growth and development (Tab. 5).
incisor and the closing axis according to age
in the different skeletal classes Average changes in lower premolar axis against
Age Central the closing axis
(year) The change ranged from 100 to 106 in skeletal Class I, and
Class I Class II Class III
(n = 19) (n = 9) (n = 11) there were no significant annual changes. However, there
were fewer changes in Class II and more changes in Class III
6 86.0 4.1 88.7 3.7 86.6 6.0 compared with Class I (Tab. 6).
7 85.8 5.8 83.0 4.5 89.0 4.0
8 84.2 5.7 82.3 3.5 87.1 4.0 Average changes in lower molar and closing axis
9 84.4 5.6 81.3 4.2# 87.4 3.0# The change ranged from 105 and 110 in skeletal Class I, and
10 84.5 5.1 82.4 4.6 #
87.7 3.0 # there were no significant annual changes. However, there
were fewer changes in Class II and more changes in Class III
11 84.6 4.9 82.1 4.5 #
87.9 2.6#
than Class I (Tab. 7).
12 84.1 4.2 81.3 3.8# 87.3 3.3#
13 84.4 3.7 81.1 4.2# 90.1 4.7#
14 84.6 4.1
81.6 4.3 #
90.5 3.6#
Discussion
The present results showed that the vertical-dimension in-
Significantly different between Class I and Class III at P < 0.05.
#
Significantly different between Class II and Class III at P < 0.05.
crease in the molar region was greater than that in the
anterior-tooth area and that extensive rotation of the maxilla-
mandible occlusal plane occurred. In addition, the growth in
maxillary and mandibular occlusal plane was closely related to
sion were more in the molar region than in the anterior
the increase in vertical dimension and rotation of the occlusal
region during growth. There were significant differences in
plane. Additionally, it was found that inclination of the tooth
the lower first molar between Classes I and II and in the
axis of the lower dentition did not significantly change during
upper molar between Classes II and III.
growth and development and the angle of the lower closing
axis and tooth long axis was generally the same with no
Average changes in the angle of lower anterior tooth significant changes. This means that the tangent law depends
axis against the closing axis on the harmonization of the rotation of the occlusal plane with
The angle in lower anterior tooth against closing axis was the mandible. Figure 7 shows the average changes in occlu-
85 in skeletal Class I and there were no significant annual sion related to the maxilla and the mandible during growth
changes. However, there was a tendency for decrease in and development.
Tab. 6: Longitudinal alteration of the angle between the long axis of the lower premolar and the closing
axis according to age in the different skeletal classes
Age Premolar
(year)
Class I (n = 19) Class II (n = 9) Class III (n = 11)
P1 P2 P1 P2 P1 P2
6 – – – – – –
7 – – – – – –
8 – – – – – –
9 100.7 2.3 106.0 1.4 104.0 0.0 105.5 3.5 107.5 0.7 110.0 1.4
10 106.1 7.5 107.9 5.6 107.7 3.2 107.3 3.8 107.3 4.6 109.6 5.0
11 106.1 4.1 107.5 4.9 102.6 4.9 104.3 5.6
#
107.1 3.9 111.5 4.1#
12 104.2 5.6 106.2 4.7 101.7 6.0 106.1 6.4 106.8 5.0 108.3 5.6
13 104.0 4.1 106.2 3.7 100.8 6.7
#
104.5 7.8 107.9 4.3#
110.4 5.7
14 103.9 4.9 106.5 4.6 101.7 5.6 104.6 6.7 107.1 6.3 110.8 6.8
Significantly different between Class I and Class III at P < 0.05.
#
Significantly different between Class II and Class III at P < 0.05.
J. Stomat. Occ. Med. Springer-Verlag Mandibular rotation and occlusal development during facial growth 3/2009 127
original article
Tab. 7: Longitudinal alteration of the angle between the long axis of the lower molar and the closing axis
according to age in the different skeletal classes
Age Molar
(year)
Class I (n = 19) Class II (n = 9) Class III (n = 11)
M1 M2 M1 M2 M1 M2
6 106.6 5.5 – 106.3 8.9 – 108.1 7.8 –
7 105.7 6.3 – 106.1 9.8 – 109.3 5.5 –
8 106.1 3.6 – 104.6 8.8 – 110.7 6.0 –
9 105.7 5.9 – 105.6 7.6 – 110.3 5.7 –
10 106.3 7.1 105.3 9.3 104.0 6.8# – 113.0 5.1# 109.5 7.0
#
11 106.8 4.9 104.3 5.3 104.9 7.9#
107.6 6.2 113.7 5.2 113.0 9.0
12 108.5 5.6 104.6 6.2 105.4 8.8 107.0 7.7 113.7 7.3 109.2 6.4
13 108.1 4.8 105.7 7.2 105.6 8.5#
104.0 8.9 113.6 5.7#
111.9 7.1
14 108.9 3.8 107.3 6.1 107.3 9.3# 105.4 7.9 114.2 5.9# 113.8 9.6
Significantly different between Class I and Class III at P < 0.05.
#
Significantly different between Class II and Class III at P < 0.05.
Björk’s studies [1–3] with a metal implant as the marker the rotation of the occlusal plane caused mesial inclination of
for growth clearly showed rotation in mandibular growth and the tooth axis of between 9 and 17 in the anterior teeth and 4
the direction of growth in the condyle. Later, many researchers and 7 in the molar region in the mandible.
studied the mechanism of mandibular growth rotation and Under the conventional concept of craniofacial growth,
mandible growth; however, there was no clear explanation. It the growth of the mandible and condyle was believed to be
was believed that mandibular growth is dependent on the hereditary and changes in the occlusion system secondary [4].
intrinsic growth capacity, and the relation to the increase of However, in a craniofacial growth study performed in the
vertical dimension of occlusion and changes in occlusal plane 1970s, mandibular growth showed great ability to adapt and
was ignored. As shown in this research, occlusal vertical growth of the mandible and condyle were secondary adaptive
dimension between the ages of 6 and 14 changed more in reactions [6, 11, 12, 17]. The results of the present study
molars than in anterior teeth. The occlusal plane rotated by suggest a high probability that changes in occlusal vertical
4.1 in the upper jaw and 4.2 in the lower jaw. This condition dimension and rotation of occlusal plane lead to the adapta-
would result in anterior open bite; however, the lower jaw tion reaction of the mandibular rotation, which is followed by
rotated forward by 10.2 to adapt to this change. In addition, condylar growth. Therefore, condylar growth occurs almost
vertically upward, as Björk showed more than half century
ago. The maxillary and mandibular occlusal planes each rotate
approximately 4 (total approximately 8 ) in accordance with
the increase of the vertical dimension of the posterior molar
regions. This change leads to an open bite in the anterior teeth,
and the mandible rotates around 10 in order to adjust the
occlusion.
Page [16] introduced the concept of the tangent law as an
important element to understand the function of occlusion.
This concept was established by observing the relation of the
occlusal plane to the incisors and tooth axis in carnivores. In
carnivores, all axes lie vertically against the closing axis, and
this is a stable occlusion from the viewpoint of biomechanics.
In herbivores, Orthlieb [15] pointed out that the distance
between the occlusal plane and condyle is larger, and these
animals have a strong curve of Spee. The same principles were
seen among human beings, and the curve of Spee was corre-
lated with DPO (bigger DPO leads to a bigger curve of Spee).
Fig. 7: Schematic representation of the average changes of parameters According to this theory, the molar axes incline mesially in
regarding the occlusion system according to age. Upper and lower sequence and form the curve of Spee. Orthlieb [15] called the
occlusal plane changes contributed to the increase in the posterior inclination of lower posterior dentition the differential angle
dental vertical height and induced mandibular growth rotation. These
changes maintained the tooth axis to the closing axis during growth and and reported that this angle becomes smaller toward the
development molars.
128 3/2009 Mandibular rotation and occlusal development during facial growth Springer-Verlag J. Stomat. Occ. Med.
original article
Take-home message
When the vertical dimension rises in the molar region during
lower facial growth, the mandible will adapt by anterior
rotation. During these processes, the inclination of the tooth
axis to the closing axis is maintained. As a result, in completed
85 occlusion development, the anterior tooth axis tends to follow
the tangent law. However, molars tend to adjust by 15 against
the tangent law. This is the result of the rotation of the occlusal
15 planes and anterior rotation of the mandible.
15
15
15
Conflict of interest
Fig. 8: Average values of differential angles in the lower posterior
dentition. Tooth long axis of the lower incisor followed the tangent law. The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
However, tooth axis of the posterior segment was approximately 15
more upright than those explained by the tangent law. This tooth axis
angle generates a horizontal strength component with a tendency to
move teeth forward and tighten proximal contacts Acknowledgments
This work was performed at the Research Institute of Occlu-
sion Medicine and Research Center of Brain and Oral Science,
In the present study, the angle from the closing axis to the
Kanagawa Dental College, and supported by a grant-in-aid for
anterior tooth of Class I was around 85 and within 104 and
Open Research from the Japanese Ministry of Education,
108 in premolars and molars. The angle in Class I was around
Culture, Sports, Science and Technology.
15 (differential angle values expressed minus 90 from our
measurement, according to Orthlieb [15]) and nearly the same
figures were maintained from the 1st premolar through 2nd
molar (Fig. 8). This figure remained the same during growth References
and development. It can be speculated that the reason that [1] Björk A. Facial growth in man, studied with the aid of metallic
molar axes are adjusted to around 15 more than shown in the implants. Acta Odontol Scand 1954;13:9–34.
tangent law is because mandibular rotation occurs with the [2] Björk A. Prediction of mandibular growth rotation. Am J Orthodont
1969;55:585–99.
increase in posterior vertical dimension followed by occlusal [3] Björk A, Skieller V. Facial development and tooth eruption. An
plane rotation (Fig. 7). In addition, the angle of the anterior implant study at the age of puberty. Am J Orthodnt 1972;62:339–83.
tooth axis is smaller in Class II and wider in Class III. This could [4] Carlson DS. Craniofacial biology as normal science. In: Johnston LE
(ed.) Vistus in Orthodontics, Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Feviger,
be the result of dento-alveolar compensation to the skeletal 1985;12–37.
discrepancy. Although there is some difference because of this [5] Dawson PR. Evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment of occlusal
compensation, lower anterior tooth axes observed in the problems, 2nd edn, St Louis: CV Mosby, 1989;85–91, 365–81.
present study basically followed Page’s tangent law. [6] Elgoyhen JC, Moyers RE, McNamara JA Jr, Rido ML. Craniofacial
adaptation to protrusive function in young Muscus monkeys. Am J
The radius of the curve of Spee was smaller in Class II than Orthod 1972;62:469–80.
Class I, and longer in Class III; however, these differences were [7] Fushima K, Kitamura Y, Mita H, Sato S, Suzuki Y, Kim YH.
not significant. DPO difference during growth and develop- Significance of the cant of occlusal plane in Class II division 1
malocclusion. Eur J Orthodont 1996;18:27–40.
ment was less in Class II and more in Class III; however, again, [8] Karisen AT. Craniofacial growth differences between low and high
these differences were not significant. MP-SN angle males: a longitudinal study. Angle Orthod
From these results, it can be concluded that during lower 1995;65:341–50.
[9] Karisen AT. Association between facial height development and
facial growth, the occlusal vertical dimension and occlusal
mandibular growth rotation in low and high MP-SN angle faces:
plane change. When the vertical dimension rises in the molar A longitudinal study. Angle Orthod 1997;67:103–10.
region, the mandible will adapt to this change by anterior [10] Kim YH. Anterior open bite and its treatment with multiloop
rotation. During these processes, the inclination of the tooth edgewise arch wire. Angle Orthod 1987;57:290–321.
[11] McNamara JA Jr. An experimental study of increased vertical
axis to the closing axis (differential angle) is maintained. As a dimension in the growing face. Am J Orthod 1977;71:382–95.
result, in completed occlusion development, the anterior [12] McNamara JA Jr, Graber LW. Mandibular growth in the rhesus
tooth axis tends to follow the tangent law. However, molars monkey (Macaca mulatta). Am J Phys Anthropol 1975;42:15–24.
[13] Orthlieb JD, Slavicek R. Geometrische: interpretation der Spee kurve.
tend to adjust by 15 against the tangent law described. This is (Geometrical interpretation of the curve of Spee.) Zeitschrififur
the result of the rotation of the occlusal planes and anterior Stomatologie 1985;82:1–18.
rotation of the mandible. [14] Orthlieb JD. Interet de la courbe de Spee dans la recherche d’un plan
The reconstruction of dental occlusion is fundamental in d’occluosion en prothese fixee. (Interest of the curve of Spee in the
construction of the occlusal plane in fixed prosthodontics.) Aix-
dentistry. It can be altered by orthodontic treatment, occlusal Marseille: These de doctorat en Sciences Odontologiques, Mars.
management during growth, prosthetic treatment, or implant 1983.
J. Stomat. Occ. Med. Springer-Verlag Mandibular rotation and occlusal development during facial growth 3/2009 129
original article
[15] Orthlieb JD. The curve of Spee: Understanding the sagittal [20] Sato S. Case report: developmental characterization of skeletal
organization of mandibular teeth. J Craniomand. Pract Class III malocclusion. Angle Orthodont 1994;64:105–12.
1997;15:333–40. [21] Sato S, Lim CD, Miyagawa Y, Kim H, Akimoto S, Kim HY. The
[16] Page HL. The occlusal curve. Dental Digest 1952;19–21. development of open bite as a result of posterior discrepancy and
[17] Petrovic A. Mechanisms and regulation of mandibular condylar its treatment approach using multiloop edgewise arch wire. The
growth. Acta Morphol Nee’l Scand 1972;10:25–34. International Journal of the MEAW Technic and Research
[18] Sato S, Suzuki N, Suzuki Y. Longitudinal study of the cant of the Foundation. 1999;5:5–16.
occlusal plane and the denture frame in cases with congenitally [22] Schmuth GPF, Madre D. Prediction of growth rotation of the
missing third molars – Further evidence for the posterior lower jaw and the modification of overbite. Eur J Orthod
discrepancy. J Jpn Orthod Soc 1988;47:517–25. 1979;1:155–68.
[19] Sato S, Takamoto K, Suzuki Y. Posterior discrepancy and [23] Spee FG. Die versdiiebimgsbahn des Gnteridefara am schadel.
development of skeletal Class III malocclusion. Orthodontic Orientation of the mandibular path related to the skull. Arch Anal
Review 1988;Nov–Dec:16–29. U Physiol 1890;16:285–94.
130 3/2009 Mandibular rotation and occlusal development during facial growth Springer-Verlag J. Stomat. Occ. Med.