Sie sind auf Seite 1von 2

Republic of the Philippines

Department of Justice
NATIONAL PROSECUTION SERVICE
OFFICE OF THE PROVINCIAL PROSECUTOR
Justice Hall, Cabarroguis, Quirino

DENSE MARIE OTTENGAN HUPGUIDAN II-09-INV-19B-021


Plaintiff,

-versus-
FOR
MAXVIN CASTILLO DELA PEŇA VIOLATION OF RA 9262
Respondent.

x----------------------------------------------------------x

COUNTER-AFFIDAVIT

I, MAXVIN CASTILLO DELA PEŇA, single, of legal age, Filipino, with residence
at Brgy. Aurora East, Diffun, Quirino, after having been duly sworn in accordance
with law, hereby depose and state that:

1. I am the respondent named in the complaint filed by Dense Marie


Ottengan Hupguidan;

2. The Question and Answer number five (5) of the complaint is


ADMITTED in so far as the personal circumstances of respondent
are concerned;

3. Respondent DENIES the allegation in Question and Answer


number six (6) of the complaint for being baseless and
unfounded;

4. Question and answer number seven (7) is DENIED for being untrue.
The Plaintiff, Dense Marie Ottengan Hupguidan, and Respondent
began their romantic relationship on February 2018. It was only on
July of the same year that Respondent moved in to the residence
of the Plaintiff because of the invitation and prodding of Plaintiffs’s
parents until November 2018, which is only four months, when
Respondent left the Plaintiff’s residence;

5. The allegations in Question and Answer number eight (8) is


admitted in so far as the Plaintiff visited the residence of the
respondent but DENIES that Respondent has a live-in partner;

6. The allegations in Question and Answer number nine (9) is


admitted in so far as the Plaintiff invited the Respondent to the
Police Station of Diffun, Quirino for settlement and agreement but
DENIES the statement, “Ang sabi niya ay aayusin lang daw muna
niya yung isa (isang karelasyon niya)”, for being baseless and
Respondent has no sufficient knowledge to form a belief that such
was stated impliedly or expressly;
7. The contents of Question and Answer number ten (10) is DENIED
for being untrue, baseless and unfounded. Respondent never
strangled the Plaintiff during and after their romantic relationship;

8. Respondent also DENIES that he called the Plaintif “Pokpok” or


any defamatory words during and after their romantic
relationship;

9. Respondent also DENIES that he raised or fought or attempted to


raise a hand or fought the Plaintiff’s father.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto affixed my signature this 29th day of


March 2019 in the Municipality of Diffun, Qurino, Philippines.

MAXVIN CASTILLO DELA PEŇA


Respondent/ Affiant

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me this March 29, 2019 in the Municipality of
Diffun, Quirino, Philippines.

Atty. MA. KAREN A. BALDONADO-GUILLERMO


Notary Public
Until December 31, 2019
PTR No. 3218465/ 01-03-2018
Lifetime IBP No. 17396/05-20-2017
ROLL No. 67812/05-26-2017
MCLE Compliance No. VI-0013817
Diffun, Quirino

Doc. No. ;
Page No. ;
Book No. ;
Series of 2019.

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen