Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
o
o
MARKETS
o
o
SIMULATOR
o
o
YOUR MONEY
o
o
ADVISORS
o
o
ACADEMY
o
o
Investing
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
INVESTING STRATEGY
BONDS / FIXED INCOME
MUTUAL FUNDS
STOCKS
ETFS
REAL ESTATE
INTERNATIONAL / GLOBAL
SEE ALL
INVESTING FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
Interest payments are excluded from the generally accepted definition of free cash flow.
Investment bankers and analysts who need to evaluate a company’s expected performance
with different capital structures will use variations of free cash flow like free cash flow for
the firm and free cash flow to equity, which are adjusted for interest payments and
borrowings.
Similar to sales and earnings, free cash flow is often evaluated on a per share basis to
evaluate the effect of dilution.
Volume 0%
Loading ad
Imagine a company has earnings before depreciation, amortization, interest, and taxes
(EBITDA) of $1,000,000 in a given year. Also, assume that this company has had no changes
in working capital (current assets – current liabilities) but they bought new equipment worth
$800,000 at the end of the year. The expense of the new equipment will be spread out over
time on the income statement, which evens out the impact on earnings.
However, because FCF accounts for new equipment all at once, the company will report
$200,000 FCF ($1,000,000 EBITDA - $800,000 Equipment) on $1,000,000 of EBITDA that
year. If we assume that everything else remains the same and there are no further equipment
purchases, EBITDA and FCF will be equal again the next year. In this situation, an investor
will have to determine why FCF dipped so quickly one year only to return to previous levels,
and if that change is likely to continue.
For example, assume that a company had made $50,000,000 per year in net income each year
for the last decade. On the surface, that seems stable but what if FCF has been dropping over
the last two years as inventories were rising (outflow), customers started to delay payments
(outflow) and vendors began demanding faster payments (outflow) from the firm? In this
situation, FCF would reveal a serious financial weakness that wouldn’t have been apparent
from an examination of the income statement alone.
FCF is also helpful as the starting place for potential shareholders or lenders to evaluate how
likely the company will be able to pay their expected dividends or interest. If the company’s
debt payments are deducted from FCF (Free Cash Flow to the Firm), a lender would have a
better idea for the quality of cash flows available for additional borrowings. Similarly,
shareholders can use FCF-interest payments to think about the expected stability of future
dividend payments.
The income statement and balance sheet can also be used to calculate FCF.
Other factors from the income statement, balance sheet and statement of cash flows can be
used to arrive at the same calculation. For example, if EBIT was not given, an investor could
arrive at the correct calculation in the following way.
While FCF is a useful tool, it is not subject to the same financial disclosure requirements as
other line items in the financial statements. This is unfortunate because if you adjust for the
fact that CAPEX can make the metric a little “lumpy,” FCF is a good double-check on a
company’s reported profitability. Although the effort is worth it, not all investors have the
background knowledge or are willing to dedicate the time to calculate the number manually.
Using the trend of FCF can help you simplify your analysis.
A concept we can borrow from technical analysts or chartists is to focus on the trend of
fundamental performance rather than the absolute values of FCF, earnings, or revenue. If
stock prices are a function of the underlying fundamentals, then a positive FCF trend should
be correlated with positive stock price trends on average.
A common approach is to use the stability of FCF trends as a measure of risk. If the trend of
FCF is stable over the last four to five years, then bullish trends in the stock are less likely to
be disrupted in the future. However, falling FCF trends, especially FCF trends that are very
different compared to earnings and sales trends, indicate a higher likelihood of negative price
performance.
This approach ignores the absolute value of FCF to focus on the slope of FCF and its
relationship to price performance. Consider the following example:
What would you conclude about a stock’s likely price trend with diverging fundamental
performance?
Based on these trends, an investor would be on alert that something may not be going well
with the company, but that the issues haven’t made it to the so-called “headline
numbers” – revenue and earnings per share (EPS). What could cause these issues?
Investing in Growth
A company could have diverging trends like these because management is investing in
property, plant, and equipment to grow the business. In the previous example, an investor
could detect that this is the case by looking to see if CAPEX was becoming larger in 2016-
2018. If FCF + CAPEX were still upwardly trending, this scenario could be a good thing for
the stock’s value.
Stockpiling Inventory
Between 2015 and 2016, Deckers Outdoor Corp (DECK), famous for their UGG boots, grew
sales by a little more than 3%. However, inventory grew by more than 26%, which caused
FCF to fall that year even though revenue was rising. Using this information, an investor may
have wanted to investigate whether DECK would be able to resolve their inventory issues or
if the UGG boot was simply falling out of fashion, before making an investment with the
potential for extra risk.
Credit Problems
A change in working capital can be caused by inventory or a shift in accounts payable and
receivable. If a company’s sales are struggling so they extend more generous payment terms
to their clients, accounts receivable will rise, which is a negative adjustment to FCF.
Alternatively, perhaps a company’s suppliers are not willing to extend credit as generously
and require faster payment. That will reduce accounts payable, which is also a negative
adjustment to FCF.
From 2009 through 2015 many solar companies were dealing with this exact kind of credit
problem. Sales and income could be inflated by offering more generous terms to clients.
However, because this issue was widely known in the industry, suppliers were less willing to
extend terms and wanted to be paid by solar companies faster. In this situation, the
divergence between the fundamental trends was apparent in FCF but not immediately
obvious by just examining the income statement alone.
Summary
Free Cash Flow reconciles net income by adjusting for non-cash expenses, changes in
working capital, and capital expenditures (CAPEX). As a measure of profitability, it is more
uneven than net income but can reveal problems in the fundamentals before they arise on the
income statement.
SPONSORED
There Is Always An Opportunity In The Market. Get Cash Back With BMO Investorline!
Compare Popular Online Brokers
PROVIDER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
Advertiser Disclosure
Related Terms
Related Articles
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
What Is the Formula for Calculating Free Cash Flow?
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
Free Cash Flow vs. EBITDA: What's the Difference?
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
How are cash flow and free cash flow different?
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
Free Cash Flow vs. Operating Cash Flow: What's the Difference?
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
Free Cash Flow: Free Is Always Best
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
Analyze Cash Flow the Easy Way
Terms
News
Tutorials
About Us
Advertise
Contact
Privacy Policy
Terms of Use
Careers
#
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
The Balance
Lifewire
TripSavvy
The Spruce
and more