Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
IB HL English
Mrs. Casady
5/23/19
Hamlet Essay
prince who has recently lost his father, who contemplates the course of revenge to take against
the betrayal from a family member. Shakespeare utilizes the parallelism and allusion throughout
the novel to portray the corruption in humanity and that manipulation will not always obtain the
Act 2 consists of Hamlet devising a plan to “catch the conscience of the King” (2.622.73)
in the murder of his father, which is evident in Hamlet’s soliloquy “O, What a Rogue”. The
Mousetrap scene is a play within a play used to portray a parallel between two stories both used
to expose some sort of a corruption within their walls. When Hamlet sees the guilt on his uncles
face which sets Hamlet on an even more determined path of revenge now that he knows for sure
of the part that his uncle played in his father's death. This revelation gave him the means for
revenge and a person to place blame on but not enough for the rest of the kingdom to be
convinced or even his own mother, so instead of his plan exposing Claudius as a murderer , he
more so exposed himself to the kingdom as a delusional, crazed being. In Hamlet's attempts to
unmask his uncles bad intentions he lost the trust of his loves father, Polonius, resulting in the
loss of his love, Ophelia. In his crazed and outrageous mission he kills Polonius, resulting in the
enemy and disappointment of his mother, Gertrude, and Laertes. Leaving Hamlet with no friends
or family to rely on because everyone who surrounded him had some type of ulterior motives,
leaving every character untrustworthy and corrupt, with the exception of Rosencrantz and
Guildenstern. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern were the only characters to not manipulate anyone ,
be untruthful or to put on an act for anyone and they end up being the only main characters to
Ophelia was a character who was used to represent the embodiment of passiveness and
innocence. Because of the fact she was a young woman, Ophelia was already suppressed by
those closest to her, but another trait that resulted in her downfall was her inability to discern
who to trust. Though Hamlet was the main focus and up to the reader's interpretation of going
insane, Ophelia was the one losing her sanity, but in the background and isn’t acknowledged
until her death. By pushing her mental illness to the side to focus on Hamlet and pushing her life
to the side to focus on the men around her, Shakespeare uses this subordinance of Ophelia to
emphasize the detrimental effects of superficial dominance men feel they hold over women. Her
innocence was a representation of the good of the world and when she died it showed how the
truly pure goodness of the world was lost due to the corrupt ideals of humanity that lead to the
submission of women.
Another character who manipulated those around them to fulfill their needs would be
Claudius. Claudius killed his own brother, married his sister-in-law, and tried to get rid of his
step son in law to assume the throne and live his best life despite what happens to those around
him. Claudius betrayed the only family he had, and through the novel Shakespeare emphasized
the importance of family and family bonds, which Claudius already broke and destroyed, yet
Claudius remains King until the end of the novel, which goes to to show that the good don’t
always win. Though in the final scene of the novel Claudius, Hamlet, Gertrude and Laertes all
died because they all manipulated and took advantage of another character intentional or not, as
well as Ophelia who died at the hands of suicide, to show no matter what type of life you lead
submissive, dominant, manipulated or manipulative, everyone has weakness and despite how
selfish needs as a result of society’s perception, they all ended up losing themselves, their
purpose and ultimately their lives in the end. With the exception of the honest characters
portraying Shakespeare's theme that manipulation and corruption can't always get you want.
Reflection
In the original essay I summarized a lot of the information from the book as opposed to
actually analyzing it. Since the time I initially wrote this essay, the idea of not only what but how
and why has been heavily emphasized in our English writing skills, so I tried to incorporate more
specifically told. A smaller detail I didn’t pay attention to before this year and still have trouble
imploring is consistent use of tenses. So when I went back to revise, I tried to add and edit all the
terms to be in the same tense of past tense. An additional small detail not really focused on
before, was the correct syntax of titles as opposed to names, for example the italicization of the
title of the novel. I also was very surprised at the fact that the essay was about 2-3 paragraphs
long, so I added more paragraphs to make it an actual essay and get more points across to