Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Samantha Luu
Prof. Granillo
English 103
When the word “feminine” is brought up, what comes to mind? In western cultures
throughout time, it was a delicate and defenseless young woman, but towards the late 1900s and
early 2000s, the role of a woman has expanded thanks to the advocacy of feminism in media and
music: women finally able to wear trousers in the 1920s, and eventually getting a more
prominent role in the work industry as the 2000s rolled around. In P!nk's 2006 hit song, “Stupid
Girls,” she displays many problems women have fighting for their place in American society,
such as facing the angel or monster dichotomy, being watched under the male gaze, and breaking
out of gender roles when earning a living. “Stupid Girls” is a song that marks an important time
in American feminism where gender roles were beginning to be broken by portraying the
The music video of Pink's “Stupid Girls” provides a deeper layer into her message of the
song. She repeatedly sings in her intro, “Stupid girl, stupid girls, stupid girls,” as the shot opens
with a young girl wearing a jersey style shirt and holding a barbie doll in her lap. Pink appears as
both the devil and the angel on either side of her, and both are agreeing and disagreeing with
what she sees on the television screen (Pink 00:00-10). The devil is smiling and egging her on
when she is shown scenes of a woman etiquette class, Pink running into a glass door of a
clothing shop, being a backup dancer wearing revealing clothes, getting a spray tan, starring in a
Luu 2
homemade sex movie, and washing a car wearing nothing but a bra and jean shorts (Pink
00:13-02:30). On the other hand, the angel nods and smiles when the girl is shown Pink
impersonating Hillary Clinton as “the girl president” and beating men in a game of football (Pink
02:39-03:04). On the last scene, which shows an old woman wearing a flamboyantly bright pink
jumpsuit, extreme makeup and flipping her blonde hair in front of her matching pink Ferrari and
mansion, the young girl and angel look at each other and shake their head in disappointment, and
the girl takes a football to play outside with, making up her mind that she will not be a “stupid
girl” (Pink 3:14-3:32). This speaks volumes to the message that P!nk not only conveys through
her song, but also enhances with her music video, shows how she was one of the leading
The idea that Pink encourages the male-dependent, “beautiful” female lifestyles when
depicted as the devil and approves of the self asserting, dominant female lifestyles as an angel
completely contradict the angel or monster dichotomy established in the patriarchal 1960
Victorian England society as described by Gilbert and Gubar in The Madwoman In The Attic. As
the authors state, women are commonly portrayed in male author texts to idealistically be held
under “"eternal feminine" virtues of modesty, gracefulness, purity, delicacy, civility, compliancy,
reticence, chastity, affability, politeness” or else demonized, and “clearly symbolizes the
demise of wit and learning...surrounded by relatives like Ignorance, Pride, Opinion, Noise,
Impudence, and Pedantry, and she herself is as allegorically deformed” (Gilbert and Gubar 29).
In “Stupid Girls,” Pink establishes a new dichotomy that instead promotes women to seek
success in male dominated fields, as the angel in her video cheers at the “girl president” and
Luu 3
female sports player. These dominant impressions being shown to the little girl display nothing
This is also explained in Tyson’s Critical Theory Today. In her chapter about Feminism,
Tyson explains that “modest, unassuming, self‑sacrificing, and nurturing [good girls have] no
needs of her own, for she is completely satisfied by serving her family...she is never angry. In
Victorian culture in England she was the “angel in the house” (Tyson 150). In Pink's music video
for “Stupid Girls,” the angelic qualities promoted are completely the opposite. The “girl
president” Pink acts as is angry and yelling at times on the pedestal, and isn't accompanied or
dependent on anyone else, let alone a man. The girl football player Pink plays as is completely
independent to the men she is playing against, and “nurturing” is the last word that would
explain how she shoves over her opponents like any other man in a football game. These figures
that Pink promotes in her song are acting completely out of their free will and passion, regardless
of what other people think or what duties they supposedly assumed in being born a woman, such
as taking care of the the house or dedicating their lives to serving a family. By performing all of
these actions on screen, she is not only playing as a role model for the viewers, but is
simultaneously proving that this type of future is possible for young women.
The devil aspect plays into what Pink doesn’t desires to prevent seeing in future
generations of women: this “Stupid girl” she is describing throughout the song. She states
examples of these types of women as “Looking for a daddy to pay for the champagne...dancing
in the video next to 50 Cent, travel in packs of two or three, with their itsy bitsy doggies and their
teeny-weeny tees” (Pink 0:30-1:02). These type of women are able to have jobs and provide a
living for themselves, but are settling for a lesser achievement by relying on the gender roles that
Luu 4
were already assigned to them in order to oppress women in the past. Women who do not hold a
stable income similar to their male counterparts, and rather take advantage of their feminine
beauty in order to access luxury items such as champagne only feed into what separates the
equality that feminism promotes. Others may find a stable job, but only utilizing their feminine
figure and sex appeal through dancing not to promote artistic expression, but to be overshadowed
by a male figure as a backup dancer next to a rapper. This only perpetuates the oppression of
women that feminism has fought to break out of, hence being shown as the “devil,” or what not
to do.
By taking on these roles of finding success through feminine looks rather than furthering
female roles in other industries, they are promoting the “male gaze” that has been ingrained in a
patriarchal society. As said by Tehranian in “Copyright’s Male Gaze: Authorship and Inequality
in a Panoptic World”, “In the shadow of the male gaze, a woman in front of the camera has no
independent existence or value of her own outside of the impact she has on the male...She exists
for visual pleasure—a passive erotic object” (Tehranian, 348). The “stupid girl” that Pink speaks
about, entirely focusing on looks, can essentially cheat her way to a position of reaping the
rewards of achievement by pleasing her male counterparts in order to achieve the luxuries that
they have. However, in doing so, they find themselves in a cycle of self deprecation and within a
chokehold from the unrealistic standards of beauty that society bends to their will, which leaves
the “stupid girl” disposable and worthless without these qualities, if not maintained. This is
message is especially highlighted in the scenes that depict all the downfalls of choosing this path:
bulimia, its effects on “lesser” girls, and displaying the short-lived image of the”stupid girl.”
Luu 5
The other class of woman, which Pink describes as the “outcast,” is shown through her
image as an ideal role model for the young girl that she is singing to, and pleading for her to
follow. This is the type of woman that Pink believes should be at the forefront of the feminist
movement, and represent what women really want. As she says in her song, “Outcast, and girls
with ambition...that’s what I wanna see! Disaster’s all around, A world of despair, Your only
concern, 'Will it fuck up my hair?'” (“Stupid Girl,” 02:02-02:12). Only focusing on the image
may benefit the individual in the short run, but does not help women in American society find
equal chance to have the same status as men and be held to the same merit. This “trophy wife”
image can easily be tarnished and is only skin deep. When these other girls are competing to
succeed in something that is generally not tied to charm or looks, is putting her at a disadvantage
because of the fact that she doesn’t dress or act in a way to get other’s attention. When Pink says,
“Maybe if I act like that... Flipping my blonde hair back… Push out my bra like that, I don’t
wanna be a stupid girl” (Pink 00:36-048). These actions, which are centered around beauty and
outer looks, furthers the gap between male and female gender roles. Although feminism has
allowed women to be able to have jobs and work for themselves, women are still treated lesser,
as if they have to look in a certain way in order to be successful or can only find jobs that focus
The fact that Pink breaks many stereotypes throughout this music video, whether it be in
society during the time released or embedded societal norms from the 1960s, shows how her
message broke through in telling her audience of young, American females that the feminine
frame that holds women back from equal rights will be broken, and if taught to the new
generation, women can be seen in an equal light to men. In fact, simply showing one woman,
Luu 6
Pink, as an assertive woman capable of not only breaking gender roles by playing football and
becoming president, but also as a woman that can be burdened by the pitfalls of being
shortchanged by not having the same sex appeal or only being acknowledged for her sex appeal
shows how forward thinking in promoting feminism she was. Changing the way the general
audience of people saw what was deemed “good” and “bad” about a woman helped women
themselves see new opportunities to pursue for their own benefit, and also helped society
become more accepting of newer female roles that would emerge in the early 2000s. As said in
“Role of Biological Sex and Gender Roles on Perceived Brand Personality” by Kumar Rup,
“This convergence of gender roles has been on rise and can be attributed to factors such as rise in
penetration into jobs socially assumed to be only for men” (Kumar Rup, 232). Without this song,
“Stupid Girls,” along with many others that came out during the time to serve as the anthem for
strong, young women around America, society would not have been as successful in adapting a
Living under the patriarchy and facing prejudice from gender, Pink shows how the angel
or monster dichotomy, being watched under the male gaze, and breaking out of gender roles
ultimately perpetuates what drives “stupid girls” from “other girls.” These two types are
predominately distinguished from the amount of money and power they have, which is shown
through their socioeconomic class and how they take advantage of their feminine charm. Pink is
shown not being treated equally in the music video of “Stupid Girls” not only because she is a
woman, but also because she strives to be something more than objectified. This promotes the
idea that a woman cannot be successful without taking advantage of these traits, and undermines
Luu 7
other talents that they may be have. Pink in this video represents how she believes the gender
roles can be broken because she not only is successful in her talent as a singer and songwriter,
but has faced prejudice for other factors that should not put her at a disadvantage, such as looks.
By literally distinguishing these actions for the little girl to identify in the music video of “Stupid
Girls,” Pink figuratively teaches her audience of future women how to overcome this oppression.
As Pink did in the start of her career and continues to do through her lifestyle as a
successful, powerful woman in both her career and a mother, more women should take action to
follow in her lead. By showing the disparity between a woman who seeks to be helpless and
dependent to males and a woman who fights against the patriarchy and pursues their interests
and dreams, Pink creates a meaningful anthem to to represent the possibilities women have
Works Cited
Gilbert, Sandra M. The Madwoman in the Attic : the Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-Century
Kumar Rup, Bikash. “Role of Biological Sex and Gender Roles on Perceived Brand
Engineering Systems.
Tehranian, John. “Copyright’s Male Gaze: Authorship and Inequality in a Panoptic World.” July