Sie sind auf Seite 1von 4

CORRELATIONS

/VARIABLES=A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8 A9 A10
/PRINT=TWOTAIL NOSIG
/MISSING=PAIRWISE.

Correlations
[DataSet2]

Correlations

A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8 A9 A10
A1 Pearson Correlation 1 .167 -.079 .118 -.167 .200 .049 -.134 -.093 -.134
Sig. (2-tailed) .379 .679 .534 .379 .288 .797 .481 .626 .481

N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
A2 Pearson Correlation .167 1 -.079 .118 .111 -.134 .294 -.134 -.093 .200
Sig. (2-tailed) .379 .679 .534 .559 .481 .115 .481 .626 .288
N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
A3 Pearson Correlation -.079 -.079 1 -.118 .079 -.147 -.216 .169 -.102 -.147
Sig. (2-tailed) .679 .679 .535 .679 .437 .251 .373 .590 .437
N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
A4 Pearson Correlation .118 .118 -.118 1 .079 -.147 .247 -.147 .337 .169
Sig. (2-tailed) .534 .534 .535 .679 .437 .188 .437 .069 .373
N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
A5 Pearson Correlation -.167 .111 .079 .079 1 -.089 -.131 -.089 -.062 -.089
Sig. (2-tailed) .379 .559 .679 .679 .640 .491 .640 .745 .640
N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
A6 Pearson Correlation .200 -.134 -.147 -.147 -.089 1 -.105 -.071 -.050 -.071
Sig. (2-tailed) .288 .481 .437 .437 .640 .581 .708 .795 .708
N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
A7 Pearson Correlation .049 .294 -.216 .247 -.131 -.105 1 -.105 -.073 .288
Sig. (2-tailed) .797 .115 .251 .188 .491 .581 .581 .702 .122
N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
A8 Pearson Correlation -.134 -.134 .169 -.147 -.089 -.071 -.105 1 -.050 -.071
Sig. (2-tailed) .481 .481 .373 .437 .640 .708 .581 .795 .708
N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
A9 Pearson Correlation -.093 -.093 -.102 .337 -.062 -.050 -.073 -.050 1 -.050
Sig. (2-tailed) .626 .626 .590 .069 .745 .795 .702 .795 .795
N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
A10 Pearson Correlation -.134 .200 -.147 .169 -.089 -.071 .288 -.071 -.050 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .481 .288 .437 .373 .640 .708 .122 .708 .795

N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30

Correlations
[DataSet2]

Correlations

B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7 B8 B9 B10
B1 Pearson Correlation 1 .028 -.105 -.071 .105 -.239 .050 .a .105 .356
Sig. (2-tailed) .882 .581 .708 .581 .203 .795 . .581 .053

N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
B2 Pearson Correlation .028 1 .353 .028 -.042 -.047 -.020 .a .270 .035
Sig. (2-tailed) .882 .055 .882 .827 .804 .918 . .149 .853
N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
B3 Pearson Correlation -.105 .353 1 -.105 -.135 .175 .073 .a -.135 .196
Sig. (2-tailed) .581 .055 .581 .478 .354 .702 . .478 .299
N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
B4 Pearson Correlation -.071 .028 -.105 1 -.288 .120 .050 .a .105 -.089
Sig. (2-tailed) .708 .882 .581 .122 .529 .795 . .581 .640
N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
B5 Pearson Correlation .105 -.042 -.135 -.288 1 .351 -.073 .a -.154 .131
Sig. (2-tailed) .581 .827 .478 .122 .057 .702 . .417 .491
N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
B6 Pearson Correlation -.239 -.047 .175 .120 .351 1 .415* .a -.175 -.447*
Sig. (2-tailed) .203 .804 .354 .529 .057 .023 . .354 .013
N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
B7 Pearson Correlation .050 -.020 .073 .050 -.073 .415* 1 .a -.073 -.557**
Sig. (2-tailed) .795 .918 .702 .795 .702 .023 . .702 .001
N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
B8 Pearson Correlation .a .a .a .a .a .a .a .a .a .a
Sig. (2-tailed) . . . . . . . . .
N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
B9 Pearson Correlation .105 .270 -.135 .105 -.154 -.175 -.073 .a 1 -.196
Sig. (2-tailed) .581 .149 .478 .581 .417 .354 .702 . .299
N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
B10 Pearson Correlation .356 .035 .196 -.089 .131 -.447* -.557** .a -.196 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .053 .853 .299 .640 .491 .013 .001 . .299

N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
a. Cannot be computed because at least one of the variables is constant.

*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

Correlations
[DataSet2]

Correlations

C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10
C1 Pearson Correlation 1 .167 -.079 .118 -.167 .200 .049 -.134 -.093 -.134
Sig. (2-tailed) .379 .679 .534 .379 .288 .797 .481 .626 .481

N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
C2 Pearson Correlation .167 1 -.079 .118 .111 -.134 .294 -.134 -.093 .200
Sig. (2-tailed) .379 .679 .534 .559 .481 .115 .481 .626 .288
N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
C3 Pearson Correlation -.079 -.079 1 -.118 .079 -.147 -.216 .169 -.102 -.147
Sig. (2-tailed) .679 .679 .535 .679 .437 .251 .373 .590 .437
N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
C4 Pearson Correlation .118 .118 -.118 1 .079 -.147 .247 -.147 .337 .169
Sig. (2-tailed) .534 .534 .535 .679 .437 .188 .437 .069 .373
N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
C5 Pearson Correlation -.167 .111 .079 .079 1 -.089 -.131 -.089 -.062 -.089
Sig. (2-tailed) .379 .559 .679 .679 .640 .491 .640 .745 .640
N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
C6 Pearson Correlation .200 -.134 -.147 -.147 -.089 1 -.105 -.071 -.050 -.071
Sig. (2-tailed) .288 .481 .437 .437 .640 .581 .708 .795 .708
N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
C7 Pearson Correlation .049 .294 -.216 .247 -.131 -.105 1 -.105 -.073 .288
Sig. (2-tailed) .797 .115 .251 .188 .491 .581 .581 .702 .122
N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
C8 Pearson Correlation -.134 -.134 .169 -.147 -.089 -.071 -.105 1 -.050 -.071
Sig. (2-tailed) .481 .481 .373 .437 .640 .708 .581 .795 .708
N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
C9 Pearson Correlation -.093 -.093 -.102 .337 -.062 -.050 -.073 -.050 1 -.050
Sig. (2-tailed) .626 .626 .590 .069 .745 .795 .702 .795 .795
N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
C10 Pearson Correlation -.134 .200 -.147 .169 -.089 -.071 .288 -.071 -.050 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .481 .288 .437 .373 .640 .708 .122 .708 .795

N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30

Reliability
[DataSet2]

Scale: ALL VARIABLES

Case Processing Summary

N %
Cases Valid 30 100.0
Excludeda 0 .0
Total 30 100.0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's Alphaa N of Items
.894 10
a. The value is negative due to a negative
average covariance among items. This
violates reliability model assumptions. You
may want to check item codings.

Reliability
[DataSet2]

Scale: ALL VARIABLES

Case Processing Summary

N %
Cases Valid 30 100.0
Excludeda 0 .0
Total 30 100.0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's Alpha N of Items
.923 10

Reliability
[DataSet2]
Scale: ALL VARIABLES

Case Processing Summary

N %
Cases Valid 30 100.0
a
Excluded 0 .0
Total 30 100.0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's Alphaa N of Items
.874 10
a. The value is negative due to a negative
average covariance among items. This
violates reliability model assumptions. You
may want to check item codings.

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen