CVCOM/R/2019/50248

Online RTI 30/05/2019

Central Vigilance Commission, (CVC)

A-Block, GPO Complex, Satarkata Bhavan, INA, New Delhi, Delhi 110023

The applicant seeks information of the following:-

1 (a)Name ,(b)designation, (c)last monthly
remunerations (d) working e-mail
address of the govt/public servant
Who took decision to transfer the enclosed
RTI application ignoring the applicant’s
specific request of seeking information from
the CVC, a public authority expected to
take action against corruption

CVCOM/R/2019/50228 20/05/2019
The applicant seeks information of the legitimization of corruption in our public life during 2018:-

1. Information of CVC advisory in the event of an alleged insurance employee accused of taking bribe is to
be promoted by one of the PSU Insurance companies.
2. Information of the specific CVC advisory issued by CVC for approval of promotion to a doubtful
integrity officer of NIACL salary roll No. 26019 namely, One dY;k.k lgk; ckj¨fy;k

1 24/02/1988 Applicant is appointed as Hindi Translator in a PSU Insurance

company; the minimum qualification required is that of second
class graduate, a class-1 officer’s minimum qualification was
graduate in LIC/GIC
2 31.10.1991 directions that If a Hindi Translator seeks transfer as Asstt. he

OICL should be asked to forego additional increments..

3.## January 2003
4 29.09.2003
5 7.12.2005
6 30.07.2007
7 30.08.2007
An employee of NIACL (doubtful integrity salary roll no.26019
**) demands bribe in consideration of claim cheque payment
from the insured near Jaipur (Rajasthan) the anti corruption
agency catches him red-handed, it is recorded that his trouser’s
pocket ,his hands became red {in consequences of gratification}.
Applicant is discriminated in promotion while junior persons
,e.g. salary roll no.24449 promoted in the NIACL {New India
Assurance Co. Ltd}, where the slogan is “follow the leader”
Kamlesh Vasisht, the then incharge of NIACL regional Office
Jaipur communicates to law enforcement authority her intent to
remove S R No.26019 ** she records dissent to explanation of
alleged employee, also records the “aparadh” of the doubtful
integrity officer that misconduct of bribe taking is established.
Competent court of law grants stay orders upon transfer orders
issued to applicant dated 5/6/2007 . A Hindi Translator is
addressed as assistant for the sake of transfer. S. B.
Civil writ petition no. 4575/2007 for promotion of applicant.
NIACL RTI reply: A Non Matriculate employee cannot be
promoted to the post of Hindi Translator. {however, can be
promoted as an assistant }
8 24.09.2007 NIACL replies that the balance of leave in applicant’s account
cannot be supplied as leave for 21/06/2007 to 31/7/2007 is
pending in Jaipur
8 26.3.2008 Sri Harichand,on behalf of NIACL is
{misogynist pleased to write:-“It is surprising fact

deposition that the wife of Mr. Soni is not

following the Hindu Family Traditions
against wife
as she is comfortable away from her
of applicant}
sick husband..” {Salary No. 20676 is
soon to be rewarded as Dy Gen Manager}
9 April 2008 Suspension order issued by name of applicant ,1975 rules;
altering his designation to assistant, no grave charge except so
called violation of discipline of leaving headquarter{February
2008}. 29/4/2008 CVC Office Memorandum Apex
Anti corruption body’s cognizance on the complaint against
isolation forced against the applicant, CVC directs NIACL to
ensure no harassment to the applicant.
8 14/11/2008 LIC to applicant:- Our disciplinary process*,being based upon
Principles of natural justice, the enquiry/investigation officer
without prior intimation to charge sheeted employee (CSE)
cannot include deposition of any fresh witness than that of pre-
declared. On 25/09/08 etc. above ethics ignored by NIACL
9 10/12 Central Information Commission records defence of NIACL

/2008 respondents F. No. CIC/ AT / A/2008 /00535 :- “Appellant’s

purpose is only to cause harassment and loss to the public
authority. He cannot be allowed to carry on his activities.”
10 February 09 Bribe taking is reported at Jaipur NIACL, CBI entraps one B.K.

11/02/09 Gupta; however, no one put to suspension. RTI reply

addressed on behalf of NIACL:-“applicant has expressed his
opinion about state of corruption in its confirmation asked
information about third party, hence denied
11 2008-09 In the garb of domestic enquiry, Investigation officer NIACL
directs “written brief” from one Harichand, it is deposed in the
said brief that applicant left headquarters to get stay orders.
12 12.02.2009 LIC informs: there is no provision of such”brief” from a
witness. (during domestic enquiry)
13 8.06.2009 LIC informs : The disciplinary authority is required to submit
complete enquiry/investigation report before taking a decision
in the matter of charged employee.
14 14.05.2009 RTI to CVC reveals applicant that his complaint was sent for
necessary action to CVO, NIACL on 29/4/2008
15 27.06.2009 It (RTI writings of applicant) is a crude attempt to confuse the
different authorities & an attempt to escape from the due
process of law,observes one A R Sekar, GM, NIACL
18 30.05.2011 Dept. of Official Language,Ministry of Home takes cognizance
of applicant’s complaint 10.5.2011 about protection to corrupt
officials NIACL, forwards to DFS.
19 June 2011 NIACL chairman’s order sets aside the disciplinary penalties of
11/2009 ;

20 10.08.2011 Applicant’s RTI 13/6/11 forwarded by the Prime Minister’s

Office {PMO} : Delhi NIACL negative reply : “Information
sought by the applicant is nearly 23 years old…”
21 15.09.2011 “Only when the competent authority is not available in the R.O.
matter is referred to HO.” DGM, RTI OICL informs
22 12.10.2011 Applicant is otherwise employee of respondent insurance
company, Rajasthan High Court interim order in S. B. (c) Writ
Petition No. 14838/10
24 26.12.2014 RBI Chief Vigilance Officer forwards applicant’s concerns , entitled:-

GIPSA company’s tactics of Writ Petition to protect the corrupt abuse of…

25 Case No. CIC/MP/2016/000371 Date of decision 30 Januray 2017

6/01/2017 Central Information Commission records the NIACL Jaipur respondent’s
oral submission:-{argument for denial of information} …they further stated
that the appellant was a terminated employee of NIACL and had filed 100
RTI applications.
The appellant stated that he was proud of his record of making RTI
applications. (applicant’s reply)

26 December
2018
NIACL eventually
promotes a fully A. R. Sekar, apex leader of NIACL
disciplined /GIPSA as on 20.7.2012 is actually seen in the company of a mainstream
employee,26019; employee of doubtful integrity S R No. 26019 at Jaipur Regional Office.
turning blind eye to
the moral and November 19,2018 General Insurers Public Sector Association {GIPSA}an
ethical standards unregistered apex body frames scheme of immunity for decision makers
of PSU non-life insurance Co.s euphemistically called : “legal and financial
support to serving/retired employees/officers ..against legal cases arising
out of bona fide execution of Company’s work”.The scheme benefits the
alleged psychopaths and their promoting managers who somehow get
rewarded in the workplace(s) of our PSU Insurance.
In keeping with ideals of transparency & accountability the CVC is to disclose the specific information desired
by the applicant, not to resort to escapism of transferring this RTI

Regards, ShriGopal Soni C-231,Panchsheel Nagar,Ajmer-305004 {91-9414982395}

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

<rticall-dopt@nic.in> Wed, May 29, 2019 at 3:33 PM

To: Shri Gopal Soni <revribhav@gmail.com>
Dear Sir/Madam,
This is with reference to your request registered vide Registration number CVCOM/R/2019/50228.

Your RTI application has benn transferred to : vide new registration number(s) TNIAC/R/2019/80037