COLLEGE OF COMPUTER STUDIES

2ND ICT RESEARCH STUDY PRESENTATION

ICT GRADE 12 CLASS OF 2019
FEBRUARY 20, 2019 | COMP. LAB. 1 | 7:00 AM

LIST OF PRESENTORS AND PRESENTATIONS

1. BARTIANA, JAMES, et. al.

ELECTRONIC HELMET WITH LIGHT NOTIFIER
2. CABIGQUEZ, BABIEJANE, et. al.
ELECTRONIC BAG
3. CABAÑERO, RAYMUND PETER, et. al.
E-TECH SMART WALLET
4. CASTILLO, JOHN LLOYD, et. al.
FLOOD DETECTOR
5. CEZAR, CEZAMIE, et. al.
CABLE TRANSIT TRANSPORTATION FOR ZAMBOANGA SIBUGAY
6. FIEL, JOYCE ANN, et. al.
POWER CONNECTION UPDATE VIA SMS FOR ZAMSURECO II
7. GAAS, MARJORIE, et. al.
AUTO-COMPUTE AND BAG MACHINE
8. GALLO, BRIAN, et. al.
WATER DETECTOR QUADRONE
9. GENCIANE, ROMAR, et. al.
POWERED SHOES
10. MACASLING, DIANA ROSE, et. al.
HIGH TECH COMPUTER CHAIR
11. MOBEDA, MELYN, et. al.
SMART SHOES WITH OBSTACLE SENSOR AND METAL DETECTOR FOR BLIND PEOPLE
12. MOLAVIZAR, KIM FREDICK, et. al.
SOLARIZED PHONE CASE 2.0
13. OMONGOS, GERALDENE, et. al.
PRICE DETECTOR TABLE MACHINE
14. PASCULADO, JOAN, et. al.
HOUSE MEMBER IDENTIFIER VIA SCANNING DOORKNOB
15. SINADJAN, DARYLL, et. al.
AUTO FARE MACHINE FOR PUBLIC BUSES
16. YAP, JERECHO, et. al.
DETECTIVE AND SCANNING PEN
 COLLEGE OF COMPUTER STUDIES

2ND ICT RESEARCH STUDY PRESENTATION

ICT GRADE 12 CLASS OF 2019
FEBRUARY 20, 2019 | COMP. LAB. 1 | 7:00 AM

RATING SHEET

Effective Originality
Knowledge Clarity of
use of and Teamwork Total
Presenters and Presentations Achieved Expression
Methods Creativity Score
(20%)
(20%) (20%)
(20%) (20%)
1. BARTIANA, JAMES, et. al.
(ELECTRONIC HELMET WITH
LIGHT NOTIFIER)
2. CABIGQUEZ, BABIEJANE, et.
al.
(ELECTRONIC BAG)
3. CABAÑERO, RAYMUND
PETER, et. al.
(E-TECH SMART WALLET)
4. CASTILLO, JOHN LLOYD, et.
al.
(FLOOD DETECTOR)
5. CEZAR, CEZAMIE, et. al.
(CABLE TRANSIT
TRANSPORTATION FOR
ZAMBOANGA SIBUGAY)
6. FIEL, JOYCE ANN, et. al.
(POWER CONNECTION UPDATE
VIA SMS FOR ZAMSURECO II)
7. GAAS, MARJORIE, et. al.
(AUTO-COMPUTE AND BAG
MACHINE)
8. GALLO, BRIAN, et. al.
(WATER DETECTOR QUADRONE)
9. GENCIANE, ROMAR, et. al.
(POWERED SHOES)
10. MACASLING, DIANA ROSE,
et. al.
(HIGH TECH COMPUTER CHAIR)

*** TO THE NEXT PAGE ***

 Knowledge Effective Clarity of Originality Teamwork Total
Achieved use of Expression and Score
Presenters and Presentations (20%)
Methods Creativity
(20%) (20%)
(20%) (20%)
11. MOBEDA, MELYN, et. al.
(SMART SHOES WITH OBSTACLE
SENSOR AND METAL DETECTOR
FOR BLIND PEOPLE)
12. MOLAVIZAR, KIM FREDICK,
et. al.
(SOLARIZED PHONE CASE 2.0)
13 .OMONGOS, GERALDENE, et.
al.
(PRICE DETECTOR TABLE
MACHINE)
14.PASCULADO, JOAN, et. al.
(HOUSE MEMBER IDENTIFIER VIA
SCANNING DOORKNOB)
15. SINADJAN, DARYLL, et. al.
(AUTO FARE MACHINE FOR
PUBLIC BUSES)
16. YAP, JERECHO, et. al.
(DETECTIVE AND SCANNING PEN)

__________________________________________
Signature Of The Panel Over Printed Name
 COLLEGE OF COMPUTER STUDIES

2ND ICT RESEARCH STUDY PRESENTATION

ICT GRADE 12 CLASS OF 2019
FEBRUARY 20, 2019 | COMP. LAB. 1 | 7:00 AM

GUIDELINES FOR GIVING THE RESEARCH STUDY PRESENTATION RATING

1. KNOWLEDGE ACHIEVED (20%)

- Does the researcher(s) understand the different terms he/she used?
- Does the researcher(s) shows evidence of knowing what the research study principles are?
- Has the researcher(s) learned something through his/her study and research above and beyond the level of
classroom work?
2. EFFECTIVE USE OF METHODS (20%)
- Does the researcher(s) have a clear idea of the purpose of his/her project?
- Is the researcher(s) aware of other approaches or theories related to the problem or the study?
- Has the researcher(s) observed any basic phenomena?
- Has the researcher(s) studied sufficiently to have collected and presented any idea or data?
- Has the researcher(s) analyzed his/her observations to draw valid conclusions?
- Has the researcher(s) used an adequate sample to make generalizations?
3. CLARITY OF EXPRESSION (20%)
- Can the researcher(s) explain the research study concisely and answer the questions well?
- Does the researcher(s) possess modulation of voice in expressing his/her ideas?
- Does the researcher(s) bewared of the correct usage and spelling of words?
4. ORIGINALITY AND CREATIVITY (20%)
- Does the researcher(s) show an enthusiasm to the audiences in order to express that the research study is a “brand
new”?
- Does the researcher(s) use a unique technique of presentation or organization of materials?
5. TEAMWORK (20%)
- Have all the members participated in the presentation?
- Does the researchers(s) observed proper grooming, gestures and proper interactive presentation?