Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Cross Curriculum themes & General capabilities Explicit subject specific concepts and skills
How the quality teaching elements you have identified are achieved within the
lesson.
Teaching Indicators of presence in the lesson
element
1.6 Students have to communicate with each other during the dig, then get to discuss in groups
Substantive their findings, then communicate with the class.
Communicatio
n
Students are engaged in the dig which also lays the foundation for the lesson.
2.2
Engagement
Students all perform the dig together to get an understanding of the job of an
3.4 Inclusivity Archaeologist, then examine their findings and discuss with the class.
-sand buckets
30-35 - it is important not to tell the students the definitions, let Teacher: T
them discover and discuss as the presentations move -divide the whiteboard up into three
ahead. rows with the first two rows at the
height of a landscape A4 piece of
paper, then the rest of the board for
the third row.
50-60 - tell students to get ready for a Kahoot (students have used Teacher: T
Kahoot before) - prepare Kahoot
- while students get ready, ask them if they would change Student:
any of the definitions, words, or sources on the timeline -get out devices for Kahoot
around. (hopefully they already got them correct, S
otherwise quickly explain where they should go and why.) Resources:
- devices for kahoot
-do a kahoot based on what they have learnt today.
-Kahoot
Other considerations
Complete the table blow by inserting the AISTL graduate standards that you are
demonstrating and indicates the evidence from this lesson that should comply with
the standard.
WHS
What are the key risk issues that may appear for and need to be reduced/eliminated
in this lesson? Using your syllabus and support documents as well as other WHS
policy- Outline the key WHS considerations that are to be applied in this lesson?
Teacher must ensure the sandpit has been cleaned of any dangerous materials and
ensure students use the spades and buckets. Students must wash their hands after
the dig.
16566066 Joshua Alvarado 5
References (In APA)
You must list all references that you have used for the content and resources of this
lesson in this space.
Resources Attached:
You must list all the resources that you have created or found in this space.
Cross Curriculum themes & General capabilities Explicit subject specific concepts and skills
-Critical and creative thinking •identify the origin and purpose of primary and
secondary sources
-Literacy
•sequence historical events and periods
- work and enterprise
•read and understand historical texts
- ask students to get devices out for kahoot Resources: kahoot from last lesson
Resources:
- devices for Kahoot
10-15 - Explain to students that last lesson they experienced what Teacher: T
an archaeologist does, learnt about primary and secondary -tells students of the class goals
sources, and also learnt about historical time.
Student:
- tell students that today they will be using what we learnt
last class to help us understand what all historians must be Resources:
aware of; investigating any issues there may be with - Video S
primary and secondary sources. http://splash.abc.net.au/home#!/me
dia/1567304/
-play the video (3m 23s) which highlights the issues with
some sources which can not be taken as complete truth - worksheet x24
until it is confirmed.
-if groups finish before allotted time, tell them there are Student:
more images on the other side of the worksheet to -work in groups to finish worksheet
complete.
Resources:
- remember to go to each group and see how they are -worksheet
faring, offering help to students who do not understand.
35-55 - once all groups are finished their worksheet, explain that Teacher: S
each group will get one big version of one of the images in - draw timeline on board with a split
their worksheet. for BC/BCE and AD/CE like last class.
- handout 6 images (1 to each group)
- they will need to let the class know if it was
archaeological, primary or secondary, what the source was, Student:
and if there could be some the issues with using this source - students present
and what can we do to avoid these issues (same as the
questions they already answered). Then place it on the Resources:
55-60 - go over any points of interest and explain to the students Teacher: T/S
the problem with some sources, such as letters, - recap lesson
newspapers, ancient artifacts etc. Where the source is
from, who wrote it, etc. Student:
Other considerations
Complete the table blow by inserting the AISTL graduate standards that you are
demonstrating and indicates the evidence from this lesson that should comply with
the standard.
WHS
What are the key risk issues that may appear for and need to be reduced/eliminated
in this lesson? Using your syllabus and support documents as well as other WHS
policy- Outline the key WHS considerations that are to be applied in this lesson?
Teacher must ensure that students are sitting properly in their seats. Also ensure
that ICT is used in a safe manner.
http://www.teachersuperstore.com.au/assets/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/History
-for-the-Australian-Curriculum-Year-7-Sample-Chapter.pdf
http://vrroom.naa.gov.au/records/?ID=18787
Resources Attached:
You must list all the resources that you have created or found in this space.
http://splash.abc.net.au/home#!/media/1567304/
Topic area: Investigating the Stage of Learner: 4 (year 7) Syllabus Pages: 58 and 59
ancient past
How the quality teaching elements you have identified are achieved within the
lesson.
Teaching Indicators of presence in the lesson
element
1.4 Higher The video with the questions allows students to evaluate the information they are given,
Order thinking then the added task of looking at the information in the presentation allows students to
reorganise and synthesise the previous knowledge by showing them how the advances of
technology and new sources can give us a better understanding of the past.
Students are encouraged to think about sources in a critical way and think about the
2.3 High implications sources have on different cultural groups.
Expectations
Students learn about the implications and issues that arise when dealing with sources from
3.2 Cultural other cultural backgrounds, in this lesson focusing specifically on people of an indigenous
knowledge
background.
10-20 - Explain to students that in 1969 the remains found at Lake Teacher: T
Mungo predate any Egyptian mummies found so far. - tell students a bit of background on
Lake Mungo
- tell students the worksheet is to be answered from a short
video they are about to watch based on Lake Mungo. They Student:
will have more time after the video to keep writing their - students write down answers while
answers. video plays S
-the video has a viewer advice for indigenous people, but Resources:
remind students that we need to be sensitive to people’s - video
backgrounds and this material has images of people who http://splash.abc.net.au/home#!/me
have passed on. dia/522233/
Resources:
-worksheet
- remind students that sources are not always accurate, and Student:
with the advancement of technology and discovery of new - looks at powerpoint presentation
sources, what we learn can become more accurate.
Resources:
- ask students to write down anything new or different they - powerpoint presentation with more
discover about Lake Mungo compared to the video. Lake Mungo information
https://docs.google.com/presentatio
n/d/1f_Wd02Hy9xE-wHAXBVbT6CV-H
7_zYe6SCvmK19t95CU/edit?usp=shari
ng
50-60 - once students have had enough time, do another class Teacher: T
discussion about anything new they discovered, specifically - class discussion, recap lesson
asking about changes in dates and anything new about
Mungo man and woman. Ask if this places it in BC/BCE or Student:
AD/CE. Go over each worksheet question again to see if - class discussion
there are any changes. S
Resources:
- let students know that other recent discoveries in
Australia, including archaeological discoveries in Kakadu
show that Aboriginal people may have been here at least
60,000 years.
Reflection
I believe enough scaffolding has been used for students to use their prior knowledge,
as well as learn many new things, but it was something i needed to examine and be
conscious of. I found that these activities covered parts of several learning outcomes,
so i struggled to focus on just two, which is also evident in “students learn about and
to”.
Other considerations
Complete the table blow by inserting the AISTL graduate standards that you are
demonstrating and indicates the evidence from this lesson that should comply with
the standard.
WHS
What are the key risk issues that may appear for and need to be reduced/eliminated
in this lesson? Using your syllabus and support documents as well as other WHS
policy- Outline the key WHS considerations that are to be applied in this lesson?
Teacher must ensure that students are sitting properly in their seats. Also ensure
that ICT is used in a safe manner.
Video - http://splash.abc.net.au/home#!/media/522233/
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1f_Wd02Hy9xE-wHAXBVbT6CV-H7_zYe6SC
vmK19t95CU/edit?usp=sharing
These three lesson plans fall into Depth Study 1: Investigating the Ancient Past,
which places them at the beginning of a term 1 year 7 class. By the first of these three
lesson plans, students have already been taught some of the overview related to The
Ancient World from the NSW History K-10 syllabus (NESA, 2012, p58) as well as a
brief overview of Investigating the Ancient Past. With a slight introduction to the ‘out
of Africa’ theory, archaeologists and historians already covered, the activities in these
three lesson plans were developed around the idea of historical inquiry and inquiry
pedagogies to help students understand the role of historians and archaeologists, how
this role is achieved, and why it is important. In order to implement historical inquiry
within the lesson plans, several other pedagogical theories were used and intertwined
throughout, but we will look at five. These include Vygotsky's Zone of Proximal
Development (Wass & Golding, 2014, p 671), scaffolding (Arnett, 2013), culturally
responsive teaching (Gay, 2000), Critical thinking (Arnett, 2013, p76) and visual
The ideas behind these three lesson plans were for students to be able to use historical
inquiry, which is about analysing information gathered from sources and examining
its usefulness towards forming a view (Voet & Wever, 2017, p 312). Gore and
Ludwig’s Quality Teaching Model speaks on the importance of teaching lessons high
in metalanguage (2003, p20) which is very much the same idea as historical inquiry.
This is achieved when a teacher guides good levels of student discussion with high
inquiry into what sources are, how they work, and what they can tell us about history.
Outcome HT4-8 speaks on the importance for students to develop a historical inquiry
the third lesson plan, students are encouraged to use a good level of historical inquiry
by examining sources, their usefulness, and looking at the different points of views
that can arise when delving into sources. In order to arrive at this level of inquiry i had
The first lesson plan used historical inquiry and metalanguage on a lower level with
the purpose of building up to the third lesson plan through scaffolding. When students
directing the students learning, then the teacher must gradually decrease the assistance
as students begin to learn more about that new concept. (Arnett, 2013). Vygotsky’s
“Zone of proximal development (ZPD)” goes hand in hand with the scaffolding
theory. ZPD theory says that there is a limit to what students can learn on their own,
and require teachers and peers to help increase that limit (Wass & Golding, 2014, p
672) through scaffolding. With these theories in mind, I purposely used a dig to
introduce students to key words they would need to know in order to eventually
engage in good historical inquiry. In doing this dig, i was also able to introduce
students to some of the ways we attain and examine history, while giving students a
chance to examine sources and artefacts they would already be familiar with, which in
this case were coins as well as two more which would be much more challenging and
increase class discussion. Even though the whole lesson allows students to be
engaged, discover and perform tasks in groups without too much teacher dominance,
a lot of careful scaffolding has been used. The teacher is supplying the words,
definitions, sources, simple inquiry questions and a timeline, but gives it all to
students in a way that they still have to use some “Higher-order thinking” (Gore &
students to manipulate information and ideas in ways that transform their meaning
and implications” (2003, p18). This is why in the lesson plan it is important that
students are allowed to arrange, analyse, discuss and discover the word’s meanings
and the sources information, then synthesise, without the teacher directly giving all
the answers until the very end where if changes need to be made, the teacher can
evaluate with the class. According to Bloom’s taxonomy the words and definitions
task would fall into the comprehension level where students are able to interpret the
definitions, while the sources task falls into the analysis level where students break
down information in order to understand the source (Karaali, 2011). The goals in
Bloom’s taxonomy and the Higher-order thinking levels are not as high as they could
be, but by the the third lesson plan, these all increase. With Bloom’s Digital
kahoot! at the end of the first lesson plan to revise the lesson as well as evaluate
student’s learning, which I could then implement again at the beginning of the second
lesson plan.
The second and third lesson plans continue with all these theories in mind, but the
second lesson plan begins to build upon the first lesson. Students are introduced to
new types of sources, a chance to compare primary and secondary sources, and more
critical thinking is introduced. Critical thinking requires students to move away from
simply memorising, and begin to compare sources, judge sources and decide what
meaning they can gather (Arnett, 2013, p76). Just as in the first lesson, the group
work uses the scaffolding and ZPD theory allowing students to help each other as they
learn to implement historical inquiry. All three lessons have a high level of
presentations. Not only is this is taken further through class discussions which are all
throughout (Gore & Ludwig, 2003, p22), it also implements formative assessment in
which the teacher is able to give immediate feedback. The third lesson plan still
carried every theory, and was the objective behind the scaffolding in the previous
lessons to get to a high level of historical inquiry and use of metalanguage. With
indigenous source and analyse the positive and negative implications upon people of
responsive teaching, one of the main aspects is that a teacher values cultural
differences, and in order for students to understand and appreciate other cultures, a
teacher should implement multicultural information in lessons. The third lesson plan
cultural knowledge (2003, p42), as well as teacher standard 2.4, “understand and
literacy was used, taking into account that students can learn by gathering information
from visual sources and not just from reading text (Roswell, Mclean & Hamilton,
2012, p 444). In the third lesson though, visual literacy was implemented using ICT
from videos and powerpoints, which considers diverse students who learn in diverse
ways.
Retrieved
from https://www.aitsl.edu.au/
Pearson.
Davies. P., Lynch. D., and Daries. R. (2003). Enlivening Secondary history”
40
New
Gore, J., & Ladwig, J. (2003). Quality teaching in NSW public schools: a
classroom
http://web1.muirfield-h.schools.nsw.edu.au/technology/Programs/Temp
late/Quality%20Teaching %20Guide.pdf
Taxonomy to
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10511971003663971
Classroom
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jaal.00053
http://syllabus.nesa.nsw.edu.au/assets/historyk10/downloads/historyk1
0_full.pdf
Wass, R., & Golding, C. (2014). Sharpening a tool for teaching: the zone of
proximal
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2014.901958