Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
BY LANGUAGE TEACHERS
An Undergraduate Thesis
Lucena City
by
Czarina C. Jaballa
December 2017
Document Code: DCAVRKMI-F-URFR
MANUEL S. ENVERGA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
Lucena City Document Title: Undergraduate Research Final
An Autonomous University Report
Page No.: Page 2 of 12
DR. CESAR A. VILLARIBA RESEARCH AND Revision No.: 0
Effectivity Date: August 2017
KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE
Prepared by: DCAVRKMI
QUALITY FORM Reviewed by: QMR
Approved by: President
Approval Sheet
Accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Bachelor
of Science in Mass Communication.
Table of Contents
Page
Title Page 1
Approval Sheet 2
Table of Contents 3
Acknowledgments 7
1. Abstract 8
2. Background 9
c. Theoretical Framework 15
d. Literature Survey 19
e. Significance of the Research 27
f. Statement of Desired Outcomes 37
g. Major Final Output 38
h. Target Beneficiaries of Research Results 41
i. Definition of Terms 42
j. Scope and Limitations of the Study 43
Discussion of Findings 50
Conclusions 83
Recommendations 84
Page
References 86
Appendices 93
1 Research paradigm 48
Acknowledgments
The researcher would like to thank all the secondary school teachers,
department heads, and their principals for their participation in the survey.
2. Background
Cite the problematic situation which prompted you to conduct the study from the macro
to micro levels, that is, globally, regionally, nationally, and locally, to zero in on the local
setting of the study.
Cite the reasons why you have chosen the topic of your study.
Support your discussion with legal basis/literatures.
Pertinent statistical data should also support your claims.
Make your presentation emphatic and explosive. It should create an impact on the reader
of your research. It should prod your reader to go on and find out what good there is in
your research study.
Note: Follow the APA style 6th edition in writing your proposal. Discussion should
be double spaced, flush left.
c. Theoretical Framework
d. Literature Survey
Discuss here all the concepts, principles, ideas, information relative to your topic. They
may come from books, newspapers, journals, magazines, manuals, handouts, reports,
monographs, all published or unpublished reports on actual research studies or
investigations done previously (all printed and electronic sources).
They may be articles or books written by authorities giving their opinions, experiences,
theories or ideas of what is good or bad, desirable and undesirable within the problem
area.
Make a thematic presentation of your discussion.
Make sure your discussion of related studies will include the topic of the study done, the
methodologies used, and the salient findings.
Explain how it is related to your topic.
Name those who are to benefit from the study – people, institutions, agencies.
Cite how they will benefit from the findings of the research.
Do not fail to include the researchers as beneficiaries and what they are expected to
benefit.
Identify the impact of your study to the different stakeholders of your study, what
do you expect to happen after conducting your study.
This refers to the products of the research which would contribute and increase
the stock of knowledge.
i. Definition of Terms
Define the scope of your study, the parameters or boundaries of the investigation, where
and when the study was conducted, the variables included, and respondents to be
involved.
Cite the weaknesses or limitations of the study you anticipate, how you are going to
handle them so that they do not become bottlenecks of the investigation. A limitation is a
phase or aspect of the investigation, which may affect the result adversely but over which
the researcher has no control. Very honestly, you should state this limitation as it brings
credence to the study.
Explain your inclusion/exclusion criteria, how you will maintain their anonymity as well
as the confidentiality of their responses.
Hypothesis should correspond to your objective/s, which means you should have
a hypothetical research question.
State your assumptions if you don’t have hypothesis.
Identify the statistical formula you are going to use and where you are going to apply
them
f. Research Paradigm/Conceptual Framework
Make a narrative discussion of your conceptual framework to explain the relationship
between concepts.
Rather than being based on one theory, the conceptual framework links concepts selected
from several theories, from previous research results, or from the researcher’s own
experiences.
Your conceptual framework should be hinged on your theoretical framework. The
theories cited should be clearly explained and operationalized in this portion.
Describe how your variables will relate to each other.
The hypotheses to be tested should also be clearly explained in this portion.
Your discussion should have a corresponding research paradigm, which is a schematic
illustration of the conceptual framework. It should also be discussed comprehensively to
encompass the parameters of the investigation.
The paradigm should illustrate or concretize the conceptual framework.
The variables should be appropriately placed in their corresponding boxes. The use of
one-headed or two-headed arrows will clarify which variables are to be correlated.
Write the figure number under the whole paradigm and label it.
5. Conclusions
6. Recommendations
7. References
Appendices
B. Research Instrument/s