Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Tayug, Pangasinan
NAME:______________________________________ DATE:______________
GRADE&SECTION:__________________________ SCORE:_____________
__________________________________
PARENTS/GURDIAN SIGNATURE
OVER PRINTED NAME
I. KNOWLWEDGE
Knowledge or information acquired by the students may be assessed based on relevance and adequacy:
Relevance of data/ information acquired 8% Adequacy of the data/ information are 7%
completely adequate to form up and deepen
understanding
Data/Information acquired are completely 8% Data/Information are completely adequate to 7%
relevant to the development of firm up and deepen understanding
understanding.
Data/Information acquired are to a great 6 – 7% Data/Information are to a great extent 5 – 6%
extent relevant to the development of adequate to firm up and deepen
understanding understanding
Data/Information acquired are to some 4 – 5% Data/Information are to some extent 3 – 4%
extent relevant to the development of adequate to firm up and deepen
understanding understanding
Data/Information acquired are of very little 2 – 3% Data/Information are very inadequate to firm 1 – 2%
are of relevance to the development of up and deepen understanding
understanding
SCORE SCORE
TAYUG NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Tayug, Pangasinan
NAME:______________________________________ DATE:______________
GRADE&SECTION:__________________________ SCORE:_____________
__________________________________
PARENTS/GURDIAN SIGNATURE
OVER PRINTED NAME
I. PROCESS
Skill evidences by the students’ ability to process and make sense of information and may be assessed based
on the following criteria.
UNDERSTANDING THE CONTENT 10% CRITICAL THINKING 15%
The student understands completely the full STRONG The student demonstrates deep STRONG
content required by the task and can undertake (8 – 10%) analytical processing of the information (13 – 15%)
with great deal of competence processes such and performs with great deal of
as the following: competence processes such as the
Distinguish (whatever is appropriate to following:
the subject) between relevant and Interpret, translate, convert, or
irrelevant content; between facts and express the information (such as
fiction; between truth and propaganda; a set of statistics) into another
between what is important or form or format transform textual
unimportant; between accurate and presentation into flowchart,
inaccurate. diagram, advance organizer, etc.
Draw insights; see beyond the
data
The student can barely demonstrate accurate, extensive, and deep understanding of the topic/ concept WEAK
through any of the six facets of understanding – Explanation, Interpretation, Application, Perspective, (9 – 12%)
empathy, and Self-knowledge – or any other indicator of understanding, where connection into a wide
range of contexts and use of insights and reflections are evident.
The student cannot demonstrate accurate, extensive, and deep understanding of the topic/ concept VERY WEEK
through any of the six facets of understanding – Explanation, Interpretation, Application, Perspective, (5 – 8%)
empathy, and Self-knowledge – or any other indicator of understanding, where connection into a wide
range of contexts and use of insights and reflections are evident.
RATING: RATING:
TAYUG NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Tayug, Pangasinan
NAME:______________________________________ DATE:______________
GRADE&SECTION:__________________________ SCORE:_____________
__________________________________
PARENTS/GURDIAN SIGNATURE
OVER PRINTED NAME
I. UNDERSTANDING
INDICATORS 30%
The student demonstrates very accurate, very extensive, and very deep understanding of the topic/ STRONG
concept through any of the six facets of understanding – Explanation, Interpretation, Application, 26 – 30%
Perspective, Empathy, and Self-knowledge – or any other indicator of understanding, where
connection into a wide range of contexts and use of insights and reflections are evident.
The student demonstrates accurate, very extensive, and very deep understanding of the topic/ MODERATELY
concept through any of the six facets of understanding – Explanation, Interpretation, Application, STRONG
Perspective, Empathy, and Self-knowledge – or any other indicator of understanding, where 21 – 25%
connection into a wide range of contexts and use of insights and reflections are evident.
The student strives demonstrate accurate, very extensive, and very deep understanding of the topic/ DEVELOPING
concept through any of the six facets of understanding – Explanation, Interpretation, Application, 16 – 20%
Perspective, Empathy, and Self-knowledge – or any other indicator of understanding, where
connection into a wide range of contexts and use of insights and reflections are evident.
The student can barely demonstrate accurate, very extensive, and very deep understanding of the WEEK
topic/ concept through any of the six facets of understanding – Explanation, Interpretation, 11 – 15%
Application, Perspective, Empathy, and Self-knowledge – or any other indicator of understanding,
where connection into a wide range of contexts and use of insights and reflections are evident.
The student cannot demonstrates accurate, very extensive, and very deep understanding of the topic/ VERY WEAK
concept through any of the six facets of understanding – Explanation, Interpretation, Application, 6 – 10%
Perspective, Empathy, and Self-knowledge – or any other indicator of understanding, where
connection into a wide range of contexts and use of insights and reflections are evident.
RATING
TAYUG NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Tayug, Pangasinan
NAME:______________________________________ DATE:______________
GRADE&SECTION:__________________________ SCORE:_____________
__________________________________
PARENTS/GURDIAN SIGNATURE
OVER PRINTED NAME
I. PRODUCT/ PERFORMANCE
INDICATORS 30%
The student (or the team) independently demonstrates the ability to create, add value, and transfer his/her/their understanding to STRONG
life situation in the forms of products and performances. This means that the product or the performance reflects the following 26 – 30%
attributes:
The entire process from planning to execution was carried out by the students (or team), with little or no guidance from
the teacher.
The product and performance is well thought out by the students (or team) from planning to execution. Potential
problems have been identified and appropriate remediation has been put in place should problems arise.
There is evidence of value added by the students (or team) in the execution of the process.
The product or performance is a demonstration of creative application of enduring understanding in a new or novel
context or situation.
The student (or the team) demonstrates the ability to create, add value, and transfer his/her/their understanding to life situation in MODERATELY STRONG
the forms of products and performances, but the product and performance can still stand improvement in a number of areas, 21 – 25%
namely:
The entire process from planning to execution was carried out by the students (or team), with some guidance/ coaching
from the teacher.
The product and performance is fairly well thought out by the student (or team) from the planning to execution.
There is some evidence of value added by the students (or team) in the execution of the process. There are attempts at
novelty (e.g. formatting, organization, packaging, and presentation).
The product or performance is a demonstration of creative application on enduring understanding, but the context or
situation in which the understanding is applied is a little ordinary or common.
The students(or team) strives to use the understanding or learning creatively in producing the products or performances as DEVELOPING
manifested in the following: 16 – 20%
The students or the teams attempts to do the task entirely on their own but seeks the teachers help on the major part of
the process.
The products and performances have some flaws in the design that the students (or team) have addressed with some help
from the teachers.
There is evidence of value added by the students in execution of the process. There are limited attempts at novelty (e.g
formatting, organization, packaging and presentation.)
There is a little application of understanding shown in the product or performance. The context or situation in which the
understanding is applied is ordinary and common.
The students (or team) show adequacy in using understanding or learning creatively in producing products or performance. The WEEK
adequacy is manifested in the following: 11 – 15%
The entire process from planning to execution could not have been carried out by the students or team from planning to
execution. There are marked flaws in the design that the students or team is not even aware of.
There is almost no evidence of value added by the students in the execution of the process or in the use of the
understanding or learning.
Every aspect(e.g. formatting, organization, packaging, presentation) of the product or performance is just a copy of what
has been taught in class
The students (or team) show great difficulty in using understanding and learning creatively in producing products and performance. VERY WEAK
The difficulty is manifested in the following: 6 – 10%
The entire process from planning to execution was poorly carried out by the student ( or team), even with the teachers
guidance and coaching.
The product or performance is very poorly thought out by the students from planning to execution. There are many
obvious flaws in the design that the students has ignored.
There is no evidence of value added by the students in the execution of the process. There are no attempts at novelty ()
e.g. in formatting, organization, packaging, presentation)
The product or the performance does not show creative application of the enduring understanding. The context or the
situation in which the understanding is applied is very ordinary or common.
RATING
TAYUG NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Tayug, Pangasinan
NAME:______________________________________ DATE:______________
GRADE&SECTION:__________________________ SCORE:_____________
__________________________________
PARENTS/GURDIAN SIGNATURE
OVER PRINTED NAME
TOTAL POINTS:__________
Final T: /20
C: /20
A: /40