Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: Spontaneous combustion of coal is a well-known phenomena around the globe. Apart from the coal itself,
Received 8 November 2017 burning coal-shales is becoming a problem in the South African coal mines. Serious incidents of sponta-
Received in revised form 24 January 2018 neous combustion have been reported as a result of self-heating of reactive coal-shales. The intrinsic
Accepted 15 May 2018
properties and spontaneous combustion tests of 28 selected coal and coal-shale samples were conducted
Available online 18 May 2018
and a relationship between the two has been established. Intrinsic properties were obtained by using the
proximate and ultimate analysis, and spontaneous combustion liability tests results were obtained by
Keywords:
using the Wits-Ehac and Wits-CT indices. The experimental results show that intrinsic properties of these
Spontaneous combustion
Coal-shales
materials complement to the spontaneous combustion liability tests results. Comparative analyses of
Proximate and ultimate analysis intrinsic properties and spontaneous combustion characteristics indicate similarities between the mech-
Wits-Ehac index anism of coal oxidation and that of the oxidative processes undergone by coal-shales. For the tested sam-
Wits-CT index ples, coal samples have a higher intrinsic spontaneous combustion reactivity rating than the coal-shales.
Furthermore, an increase in carbon, moisture, hydrogen, volatile matter, nitrogen and a decrease in ash
content indicate an increased proneness to self-heating. The concentration of pyrite found in the
coal-shales accelerates self-heating. The event of spontaneous combustion can occur if coal-shales absorb
sufficient oxygen when subjected to atmospheric conditions.
Ó 2018 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of China University of Mining & Technology. This is an open
access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmst.2018.05.013
2095-2686/Ó 2018 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of China University of Mining & Technology.
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
934 M. Onifade, B. Genc / International Journal of Mining Science and Technology 28 (2018) 933–940
The coal and coal-shale samples used for this work were taken
from four coal mines in Witbank area of South Africa and kept in
airtight bags to avoid oxidation. Representative in situ samples
were obtained from the affected areas in respect of their high
propensity to oxidation. Twenty-eight coal and coal-shale samples
were collected at selected bands of a coal seam, highwalls and
coal-shales for testing. Eight coal and coal-shale samples were
taken from the same coal seam at different bands and the remain-
Fig. 3. Symptoms of self-heating in mine face and inseam shale in Witbank, South
ing 20 from another three different coal seams. Africa.
Table 1
Results of intrinsic properties and spontaneous combustion tests for coal samples.
Note: Mad, Vad, Aad, Cad, Had, Nad, Sad, Pad, Oc, WE and WC are the air-dried moisture (%), air-dried volatile matter (%), air-dried ash (%), air-dried carbon (%), air-dried
hydrogen (%), air-dried nitrogen (%), air-dried sulphur (%), air-dried pyrite (%), calculated oxygen (%), Wits-Ehac index and Wits-CT index.
Table 2
Results of intrinsic properties and spontaneous combustion tests for coal-shales samples.
3.1. Results
3.2. Analysis
the air which caused an increase in the coal temperature. The influ- was found that coal-shales with high volatile matter are more
ence of these two processes is dependent on which process domi- liable to spontaneous combustion. This characteristic of coal-
nates significantly to coal oxidation. The behavior of the moisture shales with high volatile matter corresponding to high liability
content of the investigated samples are in-line with the study indices are similar to coals with the high volatile matter contents.
reported by Pone et al. [45]. Fig. 6 indicates an increase in moisture It is observed that coal and coal-shales with high volatile matter
occurring on the coal surface layers during spontaneous heating. are liable to spontaneous combustion compared to other samples
Previous studies reported a similar coal comportment [45–51]. with lower values of volatile matter content.
The coal-shales have low moisture contents similar to the The air-dried ash content ranges between 13.7% to 48.4% and
tested coal samples. The air-dried moisture content of seam CG 51.5% to 88.7% for both coal and coal-shale samples respectively.
to CJ varies between 1.9% and 2.5%, CA to CC ranges between This confirms with the characteristic of South African coals
2.2% and 2.3%, CD to CF between 2.3% and 2.5% and CK to CN have [54–57]. The ranges of the results are much related to properties
the same moisture content (1.6%) respectively. Seams CK to CN of some Indian coals with ash contents greater than 45% [58].
have the lowest moisture content while seam CF and CG have The cause of this high ash content is due to the peat depositional
the highest moisture contents. Seam CF and CG have the highest environment where the condition of flooding of the paleomire
moisture content than others followed by CH and those from CA, occurs periodically during deposition. This is in-line with the study
CB, CD and CE respectively. It was observed from the study that reported by Životić et al. [59–61]. It is known that the physical and
the samples have roughly the same moisture contents and are chemical properties of coal changes during coal oxidation [62]. The
more prone to self-heating except for samples CF and CI, with variations in ash contents for samples of the same seam may be
lower liability indices. Coal-shales SE, SD and SN have roughly attributed to changes in combustion. Gurdal et al. observed
the same moisture contents among the coal-shale samples. Coal- changes in ash content when compared with un-oxidized coals
shale SN is more prone to spontaneous combustion from the result [42,43]. It was observed that the ash content of samples within a
of the liability indices compared to other coal-shales. This may be selected band of a seam varies significantly. Seam CK has very
due to the presence of the mineral matters that promotes the self- low ash content compared to samples CL, CM and CN from the
heating rate. Literature studies revealed that moisture content same seam. Seam CG and CH also have ash content lower than
increases the liability of coal to spontaneous combustion in addi- samples CI and CJ from the same seam. The ash content of seam
tion to parameters like oxygen, organic matter type, surface area CF and CI are considerably high compared to the other seams. Sam-
exposed, mineral content (particularly pyrite) and rank [44,52]. ple CI with the highest ash content has the slowest self-heating
The study shows that an increase in moisture content of coal and rate while coal samples with low ash content sample have the fast-
coal-shales is enough to provide a high heat loss from evaporation, est self-heating rate. The slow and fast self-heating of the coal
as the samples temperature increases during oxidation reaction. could be due to the influence of heat sink on existing mineral
The air-dried volatile matter content varies between 16.7% to within a coal. This is in-line with the study reported by Humphreys
26.9% and 6.5% to16.6% for the coal and coal-shale samples respec- et al. [63,64]. It was observed that the liability of coal to sponta-
tively. The volatile matter for the coals is not less than 20%, except neous combustion decreases with increasing ash content and vice
for sample CI (16.7%). Seams with the high volatile matter have versa. Coal-shales SN and SE have the lowest ash contents com-
high liability to spontaneous combustion as indicated in Table 1. pared with other coal-shales and have the highest self-heating
This supports the study reported by Banerjee [53]. Seam CH has rate. It is shown that coal-shales SH, SJ and SG have high ash con-
the highest volatile matter content than the other seams. The high- tents and displayed slow self-heating rate. This characteristic is
est volatile matter among all the coal-shales is found in samples SN related to those exhibited by coal samples. Coal-shales with low
and SE as shown in Table 2. The two coal-shales have high sponta- ash contents indicate a high propensity to spontaneous combus-
neous combustion liability index compared to other coal-shales. It tion than coal-shales of higher ash contents. Therefore, coal and
coal-shale samples display similar ash behaviour with respect to
spontaneous combustion.
Proximate analyses of the tested coal samples have a similar
range of moisture, ash and volatile matter contents, compared to
other values found in a reported study [40,41,56–58,65,66]. This
demonstrates that the obtained results are in-line with the previ-
ous studies in this regard. No studies have previously been
reported on the proximate analysis of coal-shales.
Fig. 6. Moisture occurrence on the surface of the coal at Khwezela Mine (Bokgoni The major elemental constituents present in the coal and
Pit), Witbank, South Africa. coal-shale samples are determined using a LECO TruSpec CHNS
M. Onifade, B. Genc / International Journal of Mining Science and Technology 28 (2018) 933–940 937
analyser. The air-dried carbon content varies between 36.1% to The air-dried total sulphur content varies from 0.59% to 5.30%
69.7% and 2.66% to 33.7% for coal and coal-shales respectively as and 0.12% to 6.90% for the coals and coal-shales respectively. Six
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Seam CI has the lowest carbon and the of the coal samples have sulphur content more than 2% as shown
slowest self-heating rate while seams with high carbon contents in Table 1, CC (3.96%), CF (3.42%), CH (2.19%), CJ (5.30%), CL
have high self-heating rates. Coal-shales SN and SE contained the (3.88%) and CN (2.92%) respectively. The presence of high sulphur
higher carbon self-heating rate compared to other coal-shales. content can be related to the peat depositional environment and
Seam CL, CK, CN, CG and coal-shales SN and SE show higher liabil- conditions, regional volcanic activity (tuff deposits are interbedded
ity indices compared to other coal and coal-shales. Most of the coal in the coal-bearing sequences) and alkaline depositional environ-
seams displayed high self-heating rate due to the high carbon con- ments with concentrated sulphide mineralization. Another cause
tents compared to the coal-shales with considerably low carbon is that marine influenced peat when the sulphate ions in seawater
contents. Seam CI and coal-shale SH indicate the lowest liability provide sufficient amount of sulphur. This is supported in the study
indices. The capacity to self-heat appears to be directly related to reported by Casangrande et al. [68–70]. It is also reported by
the amount of carbon and ash content present in the samples. Most Teichmüller and Teichmüller [71] that fresh-water coal deposited
of the coals with high carbon and low ash content indicate high lia- in the calcium-rich environment is usually sulphur-rich and this
bility index while the coal-shales which contain more than 15% may cause the presence of high sulphur content in some coals
carbon and less than 70% ash content shows a high propensity to [70]. Seam CM has the lowest total sulphur of 0.59% while seam
spontaneous combustion (see Tables 1 and 2). It is shown that CJ has the highest sulphur of 5.30%. The spontaneous combustion
coal-shales with high carbon and low carbon contents show simi- tests on the samples show that both samples are liable to sponta-
lar characteristics to coal samples having high and low carbon con- neous combustion. Coal-shales SE (6.90%) and SD (2.53%) have high
tent with respect to spontaneous combustion. There is a sulphur content compared to other coal-shales. Coal-shale SL has
relationship between the spontaneous combustion characteristics the lowest sulphur concentration of 0.12% while coal-shale SE
and carbon contents of the coal and coal-shales from the experi- has the highest sulphur content of 6.9%. The high sulphur content
mental studies. Coal-shales with a low carbon content of 13% can in coal-shale SE increases with increasing self-heating rate while
be described as a weakly reactive porous medium with respect to coal-shale SL with low sulphur content shows a slow self-heating
self-heating when compared to coal which contains a higher car- rate as shown in Table 2. This may be caused by the high sulphur
bon content. minerals occurring in the tested samples.
The air-dried hydrogen, nitrogen and calculated oxygen content Comparing the total sulphur content to other coal samples
varies between 2.55–4.21%, 0.85–1.63%, 5.65–10.35% and 0.75– around the world, the study shows that South African coal can be
2.87%, 0.08–0.96% and 5.01–11.85% for the coals and coal-shales considered as low sulphur coal. The values of the total sulphur
respectively. Seam CI has the lowest hydrogen of 2.55% and also analysed in the tested coal samples are in-line with the study
the slowest self-heating rate compared to other coal seams. Seam reported in previous studies [65–67,72–76].
CN and CH have hydrogen contents of 4.20% and show a high lia- The pyrite content in coal is known to be one of the main factors
bility to spontaneous combustion. The highest nitrogen content accelerating the self-heating rate. The pyrite present in the coal
of 1.63% is found in seam CN and it shows high liability to sponta- and coal-shales was investigated using the inductively coupled
neous heating. Seam CI has the lowest nitrogen content of 0.85% plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES). The concentra-
and indicates a very slow self-heating rate compared to other coal tion of the total sulphur and pyritic sulphur varied considerably
samples. This indicates that coal and coal-shales with high hydro- from one sample to another due to other sulphur forms occurrence.
gen and nitrogen content show a high propensity to spontaneous The high amounts of pyrite are observed in seams CJ, CL, CN and CC
heating and vice versa. Coal-shale SN has the highest hydrogen while the lowest in seams CG and CI respectively. Seam CJ has the
and nitrogen content of 2.87% and 0.96% respectively. It is moder- highest concentration of total sulphur while the lowest total sul-
ately prone to spontaneous heating based on the liability indices. phur is found in seam CM. The sulphur forms analysed show that
Coal-shale CJ with the lowest hydrogen (0.75%) and nitrogen con- the pyritic contents vary between 0.13% to 4.13% and 0.038% to
tent (0.08%) shows a low propensity to spontaneous heating. Seam 4.26% for the coals and coal-shales respectively. The high liability
CH has the lowest oxygen of 5.65% and the highest oxygen content indices observed in coal-shales SN and SE compared to all other
is found in seam CB (10.35%). Coal-shale SE has the lowest oxygen coal-shales can be associated with the existence of pyrite which
content of 5.01% while coal-shale SL has the highest oxygen con- reacts with oxygen and moisture. The reason for the self-heating
tent of 11.85%. This study indicates that the influence of calculated rate of coal-shale SE to be higher than other coal-shale samples
oxygen from the obtained results of ultimate analyses has no except for SN may be due to pyrite concentration of 6.9%. This pyr-
effects on the liability indices used to evaluate spontaneous com- ite content might have considerable effects on the spontaneous
bustion. The percentage oxygen by itself does not seem to indicate combustion process. This supports the study reported by Stach
the ability of coal to absorb oxygen. The oxygen content of coal et al. [77]. The results certainly illustrate the advance effects of
does not seem to show a direct relation to the avidity with which pyrite oxidation on coal and coal-shales spontaneous combustion.
coal and coal-shales absorb oxygen. Coal-shales with a high Furthermore, the results show that the oxidation of sulphide min-
propensity to spontaneous combustion in this study appears not erals might favour the self-heating rate. The results from the tested
to contain high oxygen content. Hence, the percentage oxygen con- coal and coal-shales are in-line with the study reported on coal by
tents do not seem to indicate the liability of the tested samples to Pone et al. [44,52,78].
self-heating. The analysed results show that the concentration of pyrite in
The study shows that coal and coal-shales with high carbon, the coal and coal-shales accelerates the self-heating rate. The burn-
hydrogen and nitrogen contents are more liable to spontaneous ing areas as seen in Figs. 7 and 8 indicate that the areas of self-
combustion. Therefore, the influence of these elements might play heating are causes of severe ingress of oxygen into the coal seam.
a significant role in evaluating the incidents of spontaneous com- The distribution of different minerals is formed where gas streams
bustion. It was observed that the carbon, hydrogen and nitrogen may appear on the coal surface. These conditions allow sulphur
contents present in the tested coal samples are in-line with the deposits in the form of crystals and their aggregate, crust, dendrites
study reported by Czaplicki and Smolka; Department of Minerals and other forms of native sulphur and ammonium chloride to be
and Energy South Africa (DME) and Roberts [65–67]. found. The occurrence of fumarolic acid mineral deposits are signs
938 M. Onifade, B. Genc / International Journal of Mining Science and Technology 28 (2018) 933–940
Fig. 7. Forms of crystals and ammonium chloride present on the surface of coal-
Fig. 10. Crystals of hydrated iron sulphates on exposed coal surfaces, iMpunzi
shales at iMpunzi Mine, Witbank, South Africa.
Mine, Witbank, South Africa.
[5] Agudelo-Castañeda DM, Teixeira EC, Schneider IL, Pereira Felipe N, Oliveira and blends of high-sulfur bituminous and subbituminous coals:
MLS, Taffarel SR, et al. Potential utilization for the evaluation of particulate and environmental processes recorded at the macro and nanometer scale. Energy
gaseous pollutants at an urban site near a major highway. Sci Total Environ Fuels (print) 2015;29:7168–77.
2016;43:161–70. [34] Saikia BK, Ward CR, Oliveira MLS, Hower JC, de Leao F, Johnston MN, et al.
[6] Agudelo-Castañeda DM, Teixeira EC, Schneider IL, Lara SR, Silva LF. Exposure to Geochemistry and nano-mineralogy of feed coals, mine overburden, and coal-
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in atmospheric PM 1.0 of urban derived fly ashes from assam (north-east India): a multi-faceted analytical
environments: carcinogenic and mutagenic respiratory health risk by age approach. Int J Coal Geol 2015;137:19–37.
groups. Environ Pollut 2017;224:158–70. [35] Dalmora AC, Ramos CG, Querol X, Kautzmann RM, Oliveira MLS, Taffarel SR,
[7] de Vallejuelo SFO, Gredilla A, da Boit K, Teixeira EC, Sampaio CH, Madariaga JM, et al. Nanoparticulate mineral matter from basalt dust wastes. Chemosphere
et al. Nanominerals and potentially hazardous elements from coal cleaning 2016;144:2013–7.
rejects of abandoned mines: environmental impact and risk assessment. [36] Wade L, Gouws MJ, Phillips HR. An apparatus to establish the spontaneous
Chemosphere 2017;169:725–33. combustion propensity of South African Coals. In: Symposium on safety in coal
[8] Saikia BK, Dalmora AC, Choudhury RD, Tonkeswar, Taffarel SR, Silva, et al. mines, CSIR, Pretoria; 1987. p. 7.1–7.2.
Effective removal of sulfur components from Brazilian power-coals by [37] Sensogut C, Ozdeniz AH. Statistical modelling of stockpile behaviour under
ultrasonication (40 KHz) in presence of H2O2. Ultrason Sonochem different atmospheric Conditions-Western lignite corporation (WLC) case. Fuel
2016;32:147–57. 2005;84:1858–63.
[9] Civeira M, Oliveira MLS, Hower JC, Agudelo-Castañeda DM, Taffarel SR, Ramos [38] Ozdeniz AH, Sivrikaya O, Kelebek S. Statistical modelling of spontaneous coal
CG, et al. Modification, adsorption, and geochemistry processes on altered combustion due to effect of the sunray’s. Energy Sources Part A
minerals and amorphous phases on the nanometer scale: Examples from 2015;37:2114–22.
copper mining refuse, Touro, Spain. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int [39] Kunii D, Levenspiel O. Fluidization engineering. New York: Krieger; 1991.
2016;23:6535–45. [40] McPherson MJ. Subsurface ventilation and environmental engineering.
[10] Civeira M, Pinheiro RN, Gredilla A, de Vallejuelo S, Oliveira MLS, Ramos CG, University Press; 1993. p. 23.
et al. The properties of the nano-minerals and hazardous elements: potential [41] Beamish BB, Hamilton GR. Effect of moisture content on the R70 self-heating
environmental impacts of brazilian coal waste fire. Sci Total Environ rate of callide coal. Int J Coal Geol 2005;64:133–8.
2016;544:892–900. [42] Gurdal G. Abundances and modes of occurrence of trace elements in the Can
[11] Civeira M, Ramos CG, Oliveira MLS, Kautzmann RM, Taffarel SR, Teiseira EC, coals (Miocene), Canakkale-Turkey. Int J Coal Geol 2011;87:157–73.
et al. Nano-mineralogy of suspended sediment during the beginning of coal [43] Gurdal G, Bozcu M. Petrographic characteristics and depositional
rejects spill. Chemosphere (Oxford) 2016;145:142–7. environment of Miocene Can coals, Canakkale-Turkey. Int J Coal Geol
[12] Schneider IL, Teixeira EC, Agudelo-castañeda DM, Silva ESG, Balzaretti N, Braga 2011;85:143–60.
MF, et al. FTIR analysis and evaluation of carcinogenic and mutagenic risks of [44] Pone JDN, Hein KAA, Stracher GB, Annegarn HJ, Finkleman RB, Blake DR, et al.
nitro-polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in pm1.0. Sci Total Environ The spontaneous combustion of coal and its by-products in the Witbank and
2016;541:1151–60. Sasolburg coalfields of South Africa. Int J Coal Geol 2007;72:124–40.
[13] Sehn JL, de leão FB, da boit K, Oliveira MLS, Hidalgo GE, Sampaio CH, et al. [45] Cutruneo CMN, Oliveira MLS, Ward CR, Hower JC, de brum IAS, Sampaio CH,
Nanomineralogy in the real world: a perspective on nanoparticles in the et al. A mineralogical and geochemical study of three Brazilian coal cleaning
environmental impacts of coal fire. Chemosphere (Oxford) 2016;147:439–43. rejects: demonstration of electron beam applications. Int J Coal Geol
[14] Rodriguez-iruretagoiena A, de vallejuelo SF, De Diego A, de leão FB, de 2014;130:33–52.
Medeiros D, Oliveira MLS, et al. The mobilization of hazardous elements after a [46] Oliveira MLS, Marostega F, Taffarel SR, Saikia BK, Waanders FB, Daboit K, et al.
tropical storm event in a polluted estuary. Sci Total Environ 2016;565:721–9. Nano-mineralogical investigation of coal and fly ashes from coal-based captive
[15] Dullien F. Porous media fluid transport and pore structure. Academic Press; power plant (India): an introduction of occupational health hazards. Sci Total
1979. p. 79. Environ 2014;468–469:1128–37.
[16] Bowes PC. Self-heating: evaluating and controlling the hazards. London: [47] Saikia BK, Colin R, Oliveira MLS, Hower JC, Braga M, Silva LF. Geochemistry and
HMSO; 1984. nano-mineralogy of two medium-sulfur northeast Indian coals. Int J Coal Geol
[17] Singh RN, Demirbilek S. Statistical appraisal of intrinsic factors affecting 2014;122:1.
spontaneous combustion of coal. Int J Min Sci Technol 1987;1984(4):155–65. [48] Saikia BK, Ward CR, Oliveira MLS, Hower JC, Baruah BP, Braga M, et al.
[18] Morris R, Atkinson T. Seam factor and the spontaneous heating of coal. Int J Geochemistry and nano-mineralogy of two medium-sulfur northeast Indian
Min Sci Technol 1988:149–59. coals. Int J Coal Geol 2014;121:26–34.
[19] Carras J, Young B. Self-heating of coal and related materials: models, [49] Martinello K, Oliveira MLS, Molossi FA, Ramos CG, Teixeira EC, Kautzmann RM,
application and test methods. Prog Energy Combust Sci 1994;20(1):1–15. et al. Direct identification of hazardous elements in ultra-fine and
[20] Schopf JM. Definitions of peat and coal and of graphite that terminates the coal nanominerals from coal fly ash produced during diesel co-firing. Sci Total
series (Graphocite). Int J Coal Geol 1966;74(5):584–92. Environ 2014;470–471:444–52.
[21] Jones JR, Cameron B. Modern coastal back-barrier environment: analog for coal [50] Silva LFO, Marcos LS, Oliveira MLS, Kautzmann RM, Ramos CG. Geochemistry
basin or carbonaceous black shale? Geology 1988;16:345–8. and mineralogy of coal-fired circulating fluidized bed combustion fly ashes.
[22] Querol X, Alastuey A, Lopez-Soler A, Plana F, Fernandez-Turiel JL, Zeng R, et al. Coal Combust Gasification Prod 2014;6:16–28.
Geological controls on the mineral matter and trace elements of coals from the [51] Garcia KO, Teixeira EC, Agudelo-castañeda DM, Braga M, Alabarse PG, Wiegand
Fuxin basin, Liaoning Province, Northeast China. Int J Coal Geol F, et al. Assessment of nitro-polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in pm1 near an
1997;34:89–109. area of heavy-duty traffic. Sci Total Environ 2014;479–480:57–65.
[23] Genc B, Cook A. Spontaneous combustion risk in South African coalfields. J S [52] Kaymakci E, Didari V. Relations between coal properties and spontaneous
Afr Inst Min Metall 2015;115:563–8. combustion parameters. Turk J Eng Environ Sci 2002;26(1):59–64.
[24] Wade L. The propensity of South African coals to spontaneously combust [Ph. [53] Banerjee SC. Prevention and combating mine fires. Oxford and IBH Publishing
D. thesis]. Johannesburg: Department of Mining Engineering, University of Co., Pvt. Ltd.; 2000. p. 33.
Witwatersrand; 1989. [54] Hagelskamp HHB, Snyman CP. On the origin of low-reflecting inertinites in
[25] Gouws MJ, Wade L, Phillips HR. Spontaneous combustion of South African coals from the Highveld coalfield, South Africa. Fuel 1988;67:307–13.
coals. In: Szwilski AB, Richards MJ, editors, Proceedings of the symposium on [55] Snyman CP, Botha WJ. Coal in South Africa. J Afr Earth Sc 1993;16:171–80.
underground mining methods and technology. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science [56] Van Niekerk D, Pugmire RJ, Solum MS, Painter PC, Mathews JP. Structural
Publishers; 1987. p. 65–73. characterization of vitrinite-rich and inertinite-rich Permian-aged South
[26] Bell FG, Bullock SET, Halbich TFFJ, Lindsay P. Environmental impacts associated African bituminous coals’. Int J Coal Geol 2008;76:290–300.
with an abandoned mine in the Witbank coalfield, South Africa. Int J Coal Geol [57] Falcon RMS, Ham AJ. The characteristics of Southern African coals. J S Afr Inst
2001;45:195–216. Min Metall 1988;88(5):145–61.
[27] Gouws MJ, Gibbo GJ, Wade L, Phillips HR. An adiabatic apparatus to establish [58] Choudhury N, Boral P, Mitra T, Adal AK, Choudhury A, Sarkar P. Assessment of
the spontaneous combustion propensity of coal. Min Sci Technol the nature and distribution of inertinite in Indian coals for burning
1991;13:417–22. characteristics’. Int J Coal Geol 2007;72:41–152.
[28] ASTM, D-3175. Standard test method for volatile matter in the analysis sample [59] Životić D, Stojanović DK, Gržetić I, Jovančićević B, Cvetković O, Šajnović A, et al.
of coal and coke. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 2017. www. Petrological and geochemical composition of lignite from the D field, Kolubara
astm.org. basin (Serbia). Int J Coal Geol 2013;111:5–22.
[29] ASTM, D-3174. Standard test method for ash in the analysis sample of coal and [60] Siavalas G, Linou M, Chatziapostolou A, Kalaitzidis S, Papaefthymiou H,
coke from coal and standard classification of coals by rank. West Christanis K. Palaeoenvironment of Seam I in the Marathousa Lignite Mine,
Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 2017. www.astm.org. Megalopolis Basin (Southern Greece). Int J Coal Geol 2009;78:233–48.
[30] ASTM, D-3173. Standard test methods for moisture in the analysis sample [61] Sia GS, Abdullah WH. Geochemical and petrographical characteristics of low-
of coal and coke. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 2017. www. rank Balingian coal from Sarawak, Malaysia: its implications on depositional
astm.org. conditions and thermal maturity. Int J Coal Geol 2012;96–97:22–38.
[31] ISO 12902:2001. Determination of total carbon, hydrogen and nitrogen. [62] Taylor GH, Teichmüller M, Davis A, Diessel CFK, Littke R, Robert R. Organic
[32] Ramos CG, Querol X, Dalmora AC, de Jesus PiresKC, Schneider IAH, Oliveira LFS, petrology. Berlin: Gebrüder Borntraeger; 1998. p. 704.
et al. Evaluation of the potential of volcanic rock waste from southern Brazil as [63] Humphreys D, Rowlands D, Cudmore JF. Spontaneous combustion of some
a natural soil fertilizer. J Cleaner Prod 2017;142:2700–6. Queensland coals. Proc Ignit Explos Fires Coal Min Symp 1981;5:1–19.
[33] Wilcox J, Wang B, Rupp E, Taggart R, Hsu-kim H, Oliveira MLS, et al. [64] Smith AC, Miron Y, Lazzara P. Inhibition of spontaneous combustion of coal, US
Observations and assessment of fly ashes from high-sulfur bituminous coals Bureau of Mines Report of Investigation; 1988, RI 9196.
940 M. Onifade, B. Genc / International Journal of Mining Science and Technology 28 (2018) 933–940
[65] Roberts DL. Chromium speciation in coal combustion by products: case study [72] Gryglewicz G, Rutkowski P, Yperman J. Characterization of Sulfur compounds
at a dry disposal power station in Mpumalanga province, South Africa, Thesis in Supercritical coal extracts by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Fuel
for Doctor of Philosophy. Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand; Process Technol 2002;77–78:167–72.
2008. p. 60–76, 112–127. [73] Hsieh KC, Wert CA. Direct determination of organic sulphur in coal. Fuel
[66] Department of Minerals and Energy South Africa (DME) Mineral Economics 1985;64(2):255–61.
Directorate (Minerals Bureau). Operating and Developing coal mines in the [74] Olivella MA, Palacios JM, Vairavamurthy AC, de las Heras FXC. A study of
Republic of South Africa. Directory; 2004, D2/2004. sulphur functionalities in fossil fuels using destructive (ASTM and Py-GC-MS)
[67] Czaplicki A, Smolka W. Sulfur distribution within coal Pyrolysis products. Fuel and non-destructive (SEM-EDX-XANES and XPS) techniques. Fuel
Process Technol 1998;55:1–11. 2002;81:405.
[68] Casangrande DJ, Gronli K, Sutton N. The distribution of sulfur and organic [75] Wagner NJ, Hlatshwayo B. The occurrence of potentially hazardous trace
matter in various fractions of peat origins of sulphur in coal Geochim. elements in five Highveld coals, South Africa. Int J Coal Geol 2005;63:228–46.
Cosmochim Acta 1980;44:25–32. [76] William HC. The chemical forms of sulfur in coal. Fuel 1994;73:475–84.
[69] Cohen AD, Spackman W, Deben P. Occurrence and distribution of sulphur in [77] Stach E, Zierke F, Taylor GH, Murchison D. Stach’s textbook of coal petrology.
peat forming environment of southern Florida. Int J Coal Geol 1984;4:73–96. 2nd ed. Berlin: Gebruder Borntraeger; 1975. p. 387–8.
[70] Given PH, Miller RN. Distribution of forms of sulphur in peats from saline [78] Suarez-Ruiz I, Crelling JC, editors, Applied coal petrology. The role of petrology
environments in the Florida Everglades. Int J Coal Geol 1985;5:397–405. in coal utilization. Elsevier; 2008. p. 388.
[71] Teichmüller M, Teichmüller R. The geological basis of coal formation. In: Stach
E, editor, Stach’s Textbook of Coal Petrology, 3rd ed., Borntraeger, Berlin; 1982.
p. 5–86.